Hydraulic Calculation of Minor Bridge at Ch. 1+800: Reconstruction

Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 16

PROJECT: Preparation of Detailed Project Report for

Begumganj - Sultanganj on NH-46 in the State of Madhya


Pradesh for up-gradation to Two Lanes with paved shoulder /
Four lane configuration

HYDRAULIC CALCULATION OF MINOR


BRIDGE AT CH. 1+800

RECONSTRUCTION
Project: Hydraulic calculation of High Level Bridge on Begumganj - Sultanganj on NH-46 at RD 1+800

Abstract of Hydraulic Particulars

* Discharge using Emperical formulae


* Discharge using A - V method
* Design Discharge
* Modified HFL
* Linear Water way and Afflux

Catchment area 174.137 sq. km


Existing 3x14 m
Proposed span arrangement 5 X15 m
Design Discharge 1260.48 Cumecs
Design Velocity 2.71 m/s
LBL 498.192 m
HFL 503.192 m
Afflux 0.150 m
Vertical Clearance 1.200 m
Soffit Level 504.542 m
Existing FLR 504.932 m
Proposed FRL 506.117

Hydraulic Report
High Level Bridge on Begumganj - Sultanganj on NH-46 at RD 1+800

Hydraulic Report
Project: Hydraulic calculation of High Level Bridge on Begumganj - Sultanganj on NH-46 at
RD 1+800

BRIDGE CHAINAGE AT 1+700

Various Dischargeof Hydraulic Particulars

* Discharge using Emperical and Rational formulae


* Discharge using A - V method
* Design Discharge

Discharge in Upstream side 772.764


Discharge in SOC side 838.739
Discharge in Downstream side 797.306
Average Discharge of upstream,soc and downstream 802.936
Discharge calculted as per SUH 1905.25
Discharge from Dickens Formula 671.11
Discharge from Rational Formula 840.32

Design Dischage 1260.483


Project: Hydraulic calculation of High Level Bridge on Begumganj - Sultanganj on NH-46 at RD 1+800

Flood Estimation

Catchment area, A = 174.137 sq. km

I Emperical formula

Dicken's formula Ref.- IRC SP 13- 2004


Discharge, Q = C x A(3/4) cl.no. - 4.2
Constant, C = 14
Discharge, Q = 671.11 Cumecs

Hydraulic Report
Discharge calculation by Synthetic Unitgraph Method

1 Description
Name and Number of Subzone = Betwa 1c
Name of Site = Rly bridge 761/1225
Name of Place = Jhansi-Manikpur(CR)
Name of Stream = Barma
Shape of the Catchment = Fan
Location = Lat 23°-36'-11.27"
= Long78°-21'-49.88"
Topography = Moderate Steep Slope

2 Design data
Catchment Area (A) = 173.65 sqkm from Toposheet
Length of Longest Stream (L) = 35.49 km from Toposheet
Length of Longest Stream from cg to site (Lc) = 16.05 km
Unit Duration of Unitgraph (tr) = 1.00 hr
(Table no-4) from central
=
Loss Rate 2.30 mm/hr water comission report
2.3
3 Computation of Equivalent Stream Slope (S) (table T-1) from central water comission report zone betwa1c
Li
Sl. No. Reduced distance Reduced levels Di Di-1 + Di Li(Di-1 + Di)
(kms) (m) (kms) (m) (m) (mxkm)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 0.000 480.000 0.000 0 0 0
2 5.243 500.000 5.243 20.00 20.00 104.86
3 16.041 520.000 10.798 40.00 60.00 647.88
4 26.249 540.000 10.208 60.00 100.00 1020.80
6 31.351 560.000 31.351 80.00 140.00 4389.14
7 35.202 580.000 3.851 100.00 180.00 693.18
8 35.486 600.000 0.284 120.00 220.00 62.48
x Sum 17942.92
Li(Di-1+Di)
Slope (S) = S = 14.25 m/km
L2
4 Determination of Synthetic 1-hr Unitgraph Parameters
L/ S = 2.490
tr = 1.0 hr
Time lag from center of unit rainfall duration to Peak of unit hydrograph in hrs.
qp =1.331(L/S)-0.492 0.850 cumec/sqkm
Unit rain fall duration in hrs.
tp =2.195(qp)^(-0.944) = 2.561 hr 2.50 say
Peak discharge of unit hydrograph per unit area per sq.km. in cumecs
W50 = 2.040(qp)-1.265 = 2.412 hrs
Width of UH at 50% of peak discharge (Qp) in hrs.
W75 = 1.250(qp) -0.864 = 1.44 hrs
Width of UH at 75% of peak discharge (Qp) in hrs.
WR50 = 0.739(qp)-0968 = 0.87 hrs
Width of UH at 50% of Qp bet. Raisign limb and Qp ordinate in hrs.
WR75 =0.500(qp)-0.813 = 0.57 hrs
Width of UH at 75% of Qp bet. Raisign limb and Qp ordinate in hrs.
TB =5.04537(tp)0.71637 = 9.70 hrs 10.00 say
Base Period of UH in hrs.
tm = tp + tr/2 = 3.00 hrs
Time from start of raising limb to peak of UH in hrs.
Qp = qp x A = 147.53 cumec
Peak discharge of unit hydrograph in hrs.
UG Ordinates from above formulaes
X-value Y-value
0 0.00 0 0.00
tm-WR50 2.13 Qp*0.5 73.77
tm-WR75 2.43 Qp*0.75 110.65
tm 3.00 Qp*1.0 147.53
tm+W75-WR75 3.87 Qp*0.75 110.65
tm+W50-WR50 4.55 Qp*0.5 73.77
TB 10.00 0 0.00
Q in Cumecs

160.00
140.00 f(x) = 14.1677486507549 x² + 7.5696901279205 x − 0.234062640606144
f(x) = − 119.524039743573 ln(x) + 270.283958429898
120.00
100.00
80.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
0.00
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00
Time in hrs

UG Ordinates from graph(from equation for rising and recession limb)


Abcissa values from the values from Adjusted
first equation the Second values
equation
0 0.00 0.00
0.10 0.66 0.66
0.20 1.85 1.85
0.30 3.31 3.31
0.40 5.06 5.06
0.50 7.09 7.09
0.60 9.41 9.41
1.00 21.50 21.50
2.00 71.58 71.58
2.92 142.73 142.72 142.73
3.84 110.02 110.02
4.55 89.74 89.74
9.25 4.96 4.96
9.28 4.57 4.57
9.29 4.44 4.44
9.40 3.04 3.04
9.53 1.39 1.39
9.55 1.14 1.14
9.58 0.77 0.77
9.60 0.52 0.52
9.62 0.27 0.27
9.64 0.00 0.00
Total 484.05
Depth (d) = 1.0
S Qi = (A * D) / (0.36 * tr) = 484.05
5 UG Ordinates from graph

Time in hours Adjusted values


0 0.00
0.10 0.66 150 Synthetic Unit Hydrograph
142.73

Q in Cumecs
0.4 5.06 135
0.5 7.09 120
0.6 9.41 105 110.02
1 21.50 90 89.74
2 71.58 75 71.58
2.920647148716 142.73 60
3.84 110.02 45
4.55 89.74 30
9.25 4.96 15
21.50
9.41
7.09
9.28 4.57 0 5.06
0.66
0.00 4.96
4.57
4.44
3.04
1.39
1.14
0.77
0.52
0.27
9.29 4.44 0 5 10 15
9.4 3.04 Time in hours
9.53 1.39
9.55 1.14
9.58 0.77
9.6 0.52
9.62 0.27
9.641849381541 0.00
Total 478.90

6 Design Storm Duration


Design Storm Duration (TD)= 1.1* tp = 1.1 x 2.6 = 3.00 say

7 Design Storm Rainfall


100 year-24hour Point rainfall = 32 cm Plate No 10
Conversion factor for TD-hour i.e 3.00 = 0.68 from Fig.10 as per base period
.'. 50Year TD - Hour Point Rainfall = 21.76 cm

8 Storm Areal Rainfall


From Page No. 4
Areal reduction factor corresponding to storm duration TD i.e hours 3.0 and C.A of sq.km 173.649
(table no 6 or Fig -11) from central water
= comission report
0.8458
.'. 50 year TD hour Areal Rainfall = 18.405 cm

9 Time Distribution of input storm from fig. 11 of CWC Publication for sub zone 3(d)
and hourly effective rainfall increments
Rainfall Loss rate/
Distribution Storm rainfall in Effective hourly
increments in hour (in
coefficient Cm rain fall
Time cm cm)
1 2 3 4 5 6
1.00 0.50 9.20 9.20 0.230 8.97
2.00 0.69 12.70 3.50 0.230 3.27
3.00 0.80 14.72 2.02 0.230 1.79
4.00 0.88 16.20 1.47 0.230 1.24
5.00 0.92 16.93 0.74 0.230 0.51
6.00 0.97 17.853 0.92 0.230 0.69
7.00 1 18.405 0.55 0.230 0.32

Design Base flow = 0.018 cumec/m2 Table no- 5 from central water comission report

Total Base flow for C.A = 0.018 x 173.65 = 3.126 Cumecs


10 100 year flood peak

Rainfall Excess
Time in hours SUG ordinates ordinates Direct runoff
Arrangement
0 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.00 9.41 0.51 4.762
2.00 21.50 0.69 14.843
2.92 71.58 1.79 128.449
3.84 142.73 8.97 1280.647
4.55 110.02 3.27 359.418
9.25 89.74 1.24 111.496
9.28 4.96 0.51 2.509

Total 1902.13 cumecs.


Base flow 3.13 cumecs.
Peak dischare 1905.25 cumecs.
Project: Hydraulic calculation of High Level Bridge on Begumganj - Sultanganj on NH-46 at RD 1+800

BRIDGE CHAINAGE AT 1+700

II Rational Formula
Catchment Area (A)
= 174.137 sqkm
Coefficient of Runoff (C)
= 14.000 Clause 4.2 SP-13
Percentage Coeficient of Runoff for the Catchment Characteristics (P)
Clause 4.9, Table 2,
= 0.700
SP-13

Distance from the Critical Point to the Culvert in K.M (L)


= 22.53 km
Fall in Level from critical point to the culvert in M (H)
= 180.00 m
tc = Time of concentration in Hr.

tc = (.87 X L3 / H).385
= 4.686 hours Clause 4.7, SP 13
Rainfall in cm (F)
= 7.00 cm Ref SP:13 record
Time in hr (T)
= 1.0 hr
Critical Intensity of Rainfall in cm per hr (Ic)

Ic =F/T*((T+1)F/T*((T+1)/(tc+1))
= 2.462 cm/hr Clause 4.8, SP 13
Calculation of Discharge By Dicken's Formula
1
Q = C*( A )3/4 = 671.11 cumecs
II Calculation of Discharge By Rational Formula

Q =0.028*P*A*Ic*100
= 840.32 cumecs
Project: Hydraulic calculation of High Level Bridge on Begumganj - Sultanganj on NH-46 at RD 1+800

Bed Slope / Longitudinal Slope of River/ stream


S. No. length LBL
1 0 498.942
2 40.00 498.917
3 80.00 498.892
4 120.00 498.867
5 160.00 498.842
6 200.00 498.817
7 240.00 498.792
8 280.00 498.767
9 320.00 498.742
10 360.00 498.717
11 400.00 498.632
12 440.00 498.547
13 480.00 498.462
14 520.00 498.377
15 560.00 498.292
16 600.00 498.207
17 640.00 498.122
18 680.00 498.037
19 720.00 497.952
20 760.00 497.867
21 800.00 497.782
22 840.00 497.697
23 880.00 497.612
24 920.00 497.527
25 960.00 497.442
26 1000.00 497.442

Bed slope = 0.0015 - ve sign indicate Down Ward Slope


Bed lev el

f(x) = − 0.001652991452991 x + 499.145418803419


BED SLOPE

Chainage in m

Hydraulic Report
Project: Hydraulic calculation of High Level Bridge on Begumganj - Sultanganj on NH-46 at RD 1+800

Flood Estimation by Area-Velocity Method Cross section at 500.00 m U/S


IRC SP 13-2014(Table 3.12)
H.F.L = 503.942 m L.B.L = 498.942 m
Bed slope So = 0.00150 Spread length = 75.00 m
Rugosity coefficient, n= 0.0350 IRC SP 13-2014 ( Table 5.1 )

S.No. H.F.L Length (m) Bed Level D.O.F A.D.O.F Distance Area W.P
1 503.942 37.5 503.553 0.389 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
2 503.942 32.1 501.964 1.978 1.183 5.357 6.338 5.588
3 503.942 26.8 501.241 2.701 2.339 5.357 12.531 5.406
4 503.942 21.4 500.585 3.357 3.029 5.357 16.225 5.397
5 503.942 16.1 499.060 4.882 4.119 5.357 22.067 5.570
6 503.942 10.7 499.056 4.886 4.884 5.357 26.164 5.357
7 503.942 5.4 498.987 4.955 4.921 5.357 26.360 5.358
8 503.942 0.0 498.942 5.000 4.977 5.357 26.665 5.357
9 503.942 5.4 498.943 4.999 5.000 5.357 26.783 5.357
10 503.942 10.7 498.946 4.996 4.998 5.357 26.773 5.357
11 503.942 16.1 498.967 4.975 4.986 5.357 26.709 5.357
12 503.942 21.4 499.445 4.497 4.736 5.357 25.372 5.378
13 503.942 26.8 500.234 3.708 4.103 5.357 21.978 5.415
14 503.942 32.1 501.492 2.450 3.079 5.357 16.495 5.503
15 503.942 37.5 503.637 0.305 1.378 5.357 7.380 5.771
Total (Cross sectional Area, A) = 287.840 sq. m
Wetted Perimeter, R in m = 76.171
Abbreviations
Hydraulic Radius, R=A/P= 3.779 m H.F.L. - High Flood Level
Velocity, V = 1  2 1
 Ref:-(IRC SP-13.2014 cl.no.-(5.4))
 R 3
 V 2 
n  
 
= 3.779^(2/3) x (0.0015^0.5)/0.035) D.O.F. - Depth Of Flow
= 2.68 m/sec A.D.O.F.- Average Depth Of Flow
Discharge, Q = A*V W.P. - Wetted Perimeter
= 287.84 x 2.6847 = 772.764 cumecs L.B.L. - Lowest Bed Level

505.000
HFL
Bed Level

504.000
503.000
502.000
501.000
500.000
499.000
498.000
497.000
496.000

Chainage in m

Hydraulic Report
Project: Hydraulic calculation of High Level Bridge on Begumganj - Sultanganj on NH-46 at RD 1+800

Flood Estimation by Area-Velocity Method Cross section at Site of crossing


H.F.L = 503.192 m L.B.L = 498.192 m

Bed slope So = 0.00150 Spread length = 80.00 m


Rugosity coefficient, n= 0.0350 IRC SP 13-2014 ( Table 5.1 )

S.No. H.F.L Length (m) Bed Level D.O.F A.D.O.F Distance Area W.P
1 503.192 40.0 503.037 0.155 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
2 503.192 32.0 500.737 2.455 1.305 8.000 10.440 8.000
3 503.192 24.0 499.537 3.655 3.055 8.000 24.440 8.089
4 503.192 16.0 498.792 4.400 4.027 8.000 32.220 8.035
5 503.192 8.0 498.194 4.998 4.699 8.000 37.592 8.022
6 503.192 4.0 498.193 4.999 4.999 4.000 19.994 4.000
7 503.192 0.0 498.192 5.000 5.000 4.000 19.998 4.000
8 503.192 4.0 498.193 4.999 5.000 4.000 19.998 4.000
9 503.192 8.0 498.195 4.997 4.998 4.000 19.991 4.000
10 503.192 16.0 498.261 4.931 4.964 8.000 39.710 8.000
11 503.192 24.0 498.266 4.926 4.928 8.000 39.428 8.000
12 503.192 32.0 500.246 2.946 3.936 8.000 31.489 8.241
13 503.192 40.0 502.600 0.592 1.769 8.000 14.153 8.339
499.419 Total (Cross sectional Area, A) = 309.452 sq. m
3.77328462 Wetted Perimeter, R in m = 80.727
Abbreviations
Hydraulic Radius, R=A/P= 3.833 m H.F.L. - High Flood Level
Velocity, V = 1  2 1
 Ref:-(IRC SP-13.2014 cl.no.-(5.4))
 R 3
 V 2 
n  
 
= 3.8333^(2/3) x (0.0015^0.5)/0.035) D.O.F. - Depth Of Flow
= 2.71 m/sec A.D.O.F.- Average Depth Of Flow
W.P. - Wetted Perimeter
Discharge, Q = A*V L.B.L. - Lowest Bed Level
= 309.452 x 2.71 = 838.739 cumecs

504.0
Bed Level

503.0
502.0
501.0 HFL
500.0
499.0
498.0
497.0
496.0
495.0

Chainage in m

Hydraulic Report
Project: Hydraulic calculation of High Level Bridge on Begumganj - Sultanganj on NH-46 at RD 1+800

Flood Estimation by Area-Velocity Method Cross section at 500.00 m D/S


IRC SP 13-2014(Table 3.12)
H.F.L = 502.442 m L.B.L = 497.442 m
Bed slope So = 0.00150 Spread length = 75.00 m
Rugosity coefficient, n= 0.0350 IRC SP 13-2014 ( Table 5.1 )

S.No. H.F.L Length (m) Bed Level D.O.F A.D.O.F Distance Area W.P
1 502.442 37.5 502.019 0.423 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000
2 502.442 32.1 500.173 2.269 1.346 5.357 7.21 5.666
3 502.442 26.8 499.210 3.232 2.751 5.357 14.74 5.443
4 502.442 21.4 498.854 3.588 3.410 5.357 18.27 5.369
5 502.442 16.1 498.519 3.923 3.755 5.357 20.12 5.368
6 502.442 10.7 498.093 4.349 4.136 5.357 22.16 5.374
7 502.442 5.4 497.778 4.664 4.506 5.357 24.14 5.366
8 502.442 0.0 497.442 5.000 4.832 5.357 25.89 5.368
9 502.442 5.4 497.444 4.998 4.999 5.357 26.78 5.357
10 502.442 10.7 497.446 4.996 4.997 5.357 26.77 5.357
11 502.442 16.1 497.500 4.942 4.969 5.357 26.62 5.357
12 502.442 21.4 497.852 4.590 4.766 5.357 25.53 5.369
13 502.442 26.8 498.210 4.232 4.411 5.357 23.63 5.369
14 502.442 32.1 498.886 3.556 3.894 5.357 20.86 5.400
15 502.442 37.5 501.951 0.491 2.024 5.357 10.84 6.172
Total (Cross sectional Area, A) = 293.559 sq. m
Wetted Perimeter, R in m = 76.335
Abbreviations
Hydraulic Radius, R=A/P= 3.846 m H.F.L. - High Flood Level
Velocity, V = 1  2 1
 Ref:-(IRC SP-13.2014 cl.no.-(5.4))
 R 3
 V 2 
n  
 
= 3.8457^(2/3) x (0.0015^0.5)/0.035) D.O.F. - Depth Of Flow
= 2.72 m/sec A.D.O.F.- Average Depth Of Flow
W.P. - Wetted Perimeter
Discharge, Q = A*V L.B.L. - Lowest Bed Level
= 293.559 x 2.716 = 797.306 cumecs
Bed Level

503.0 HFL
502.0
501.0
500.0
499.0
498.0
497.0
496.0
495.0
494.0

Chainage in m

Hydraulic Report
Project: Hydraulic calculation of High Level Bridge on Begumganj - Sultanganj on NH-46 at RD 1+800

1 Afflux Calculations

By Molesworth formula (IRC:5-2015 CL. No.106.6.2)

  Au   2
Afflux =  V2
  0.015     1
17.89   Ae  
Afflux = ((2.7104^2)/17.89)+0.015)x(((309.452/269.968776)^2)-1)

Velocity, V = 2.71 m/sec


Unobstructed area, Au = 309.45 m2
Effective vent area, Ae = 269.97 m2
Afflux = 0.15 m

2 Linear Water Way:


Discharge by Empericle 671.11 m3/s
Discharge by Area velocity
(a) At U/s Side- 772.76 m3/s
(b) At Bridge Side- 838.74 m3/s
(c) At D/s Side- 797.31 m3/s
Design discharge (Q) = 1260.48 m3/s (SP 13 Para 6.2.1)
Velocity of river (V) = 2.71 m/s
HFL = 503.192 m
Lowest Bed level = 498.19 m
Mean Depth of water (H) = 3.89 m
Afflux = 0.15 m
Required Linear water way = Q /( H  V ) = 1260.48/(2.7104 x (3.89+0.15)
115.11 m

Proposed vent way = 75-1*4-0.8*2 69.40 m


Silt Factor "f" = 4.5 (IRC:78-2014 CL. No.703.2.2.1)
Linear Water Way = 4.8  Q = 4.8*1260.48^0.5
170.42 m
(IRC:5-2015 CL. No.106.5.1)
3. Fixing of Soffit Level
Vertical clearance (Vc) required = 1.20 m (As per Cl. No. 106.8.2 of IRC: - 5-2015)
required Soffit Level 504.392 m

Hence, provided Sofiit Level 504.542 m

Hydraulic Report
Project: Hydraulic calculation of High Level Bridge on Begumganj - Sultanganj on NH-46 at RD 1+800

1 Scour Depth:

Design discharge 1260.5 m3/s


Design discharge for foundation 1260.5 m3/s
Clear ventway 69.40 m
HFL 503.192 m
LBL 498.19 m

dsm = 1.34 (Db2 / Ksf)^1/3 IRC 78 - 2014


where, Db = the discharge in cumecs per metre width. cl.703.2
Ksf = silt factor
Db = 23.61 cumecs/m 30% increase discharge
IRC 78 - 2014
cl.No. 703.1.1
Ksf = 4.500 Silt factor Ksf as per
dsm = 1.34 x (23.611^2 / 4.5)^(1/3) = 6.680 m below HFL

Max. depth of scour for Piers = 2 x dsm = 13.360 m IRC 78 - 2014


Below HFL cl. No.703.3.1.1
Max. depth of scour for Abutment = 1.27 x dsm = 8.484 m IRC 78 - 2014
Below HFL of IRC 78 - 2014
Scour Level for Piers = 489.832 m cl. No.703.3.1.1

Scour level for Abutments = 494.710 m

Foundation Level for Piers = ( 489.832 - 2 ) IRC 78-2014


= 487.832 m cl.No.705.2.1
=
Foundation level for Abutments = ( 494.71 - 2 ) IRC 78-2014
= 492.710 m cl.No.705.2.1

You might also like