Scribd
Upload
89 views2 pages

TC

According to the document: 1. The de-development framework aims to have rich countries reduce consumption and output to achieve prosperity, well-being and happiness, rather than constant economic growth. This would allow poorer countries to "catch up" instead of constantly trying to "catch down" to wealthier economies. 2. Traditional development frameworks see more growth as always improving lives, but de-development removes these negative outcomes by focusing on quality of life over quantity of production and consumption. 3. Hickel argues that rich countries can achieve longevity through de-developing by choosing quality over quantity and reducing consumption to maintain well-being.

Uploaded by

Yona Cruz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
89 views2 pages

TC

According to the document: 1. The de-development framework aims to have rich countries reduce consumption and output to achieve prosperity, well-being and happiness, rather than constant economic growth. This would allow poorer countries to "catch up" instead of constantly trying to "catch down" to wealthier economies. 2. Traditional development frameworks see more growth as always improving lives, but de-development removes these negative outcomes by focusing on quality of life over quantity of production and consumption. 3. Hickel argues that rich countries can achieve longevity through de-developing by choosing quality over quantity and reducing consumption to maintain well-being.

Uploaded by

Yona Cruz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

ANSWER 1: INSTRUMENTAL GOOD – ULTIMATE GOOD

According to Aristotle instrumental good is good by only in same situation. It is estimate as a manner of
something else. Instrumental good by disparity are like good only in virtue of their part in encourage
other good things and ultimately naturally good things. It positioned in a natural relation to inner good.
Aristotle explained that happiness is the ultimate good, because it is end thing.

ANSWER 2: PLEASURE – HAPPINESS

According to Aristotle – pleasure is not the goal of every person, because every pleasure is not good. He
said highest good is naturally good. We can find pleasure in different activities; it could be good or bad.
Pleasure is different than happiness. Because we select happiness as a final in itself. Happiness include in
accomplish all the time of an entire life.

Pleasure consequence from efforts without barrier. He highlighted that pleasure is never seek for its
own cause.

ANSWER 3: VIRTUE – VICE

According to Aristotle, virtue as a temperament to act in the accurate style and as a manner between
uttermost of insufficiency and exhuberance which are vices. He described virtue essentially through
habit and procedure preferably than through logic and command. Virtue is a consequence of having the
suitable behavior regarding pain and pleasure. Vice was explained in theology as the inattentive of
virtue, but Aristotle present virtue as a manner between two contrast vices.
1. The developing framework is aimed to make sound or rich countries “catch down” to less
developed or poorer countries instead of the latter “catching up to richer economies. Moreover,
the de-developing framework” is to changing the sense and idea of development, from growth
of economy to the prosperity.

2: The traditional framework of the de-development is the concept that the individuals need more
and more growth for improving and making their lives better. But the de-developing framework
bear away and takes away these kinds of negative outcomes.

3: Hickel states that the rich countries can de-develop if they reduce their consumption for
maintaining prosperity, wellbeing and happiness, and rich countries will achieve the lifelong
expectancy. In other words, Hickel states that they can de-develop by sticking or force to quality
through and over quantity.

4: As we know that humans always want to do progress contentiously, the term such as de-growth is
just like implying to stop development and progressing. Moreover, Hickel frown upon pundits using
terms such as de-growth, zero growth, or de-development in describing an alternative framework
because these terms give a negative insight about the progress within the countries.

5: Hickel states that de-developing does not tell us to give things up or that de-development is not
about giving things up. Because it is simple to reduce the consumption for maintaining well being
and happiness as we discussed above. It can be also viewed as the slowing down. In addition to this
Hickel also states that rapid development is somewhat and partly bad because we tend to avoid and
keep away the laws of nature.

You might also like