This document discusses analyzing primary sources in Philippine history. It explains that understanding the historical context is key to interpreting primary sources accurately. It outlines different types of primary sources and content analysis methods. Specifically, contextual analysis considers the time, place, author's background and intent. Primary sources provide different perspectives on historical events. The document provides examples of analyzing primary sources, noting biases from the author's loyalty and circumstances of writing. Overall, primary sources are valuable to understand Philippine history if their content and context are critically analyzed.
This document discusses analyzing primary sources in Philippine history. It explains that understanding the historical context is key to interpreting primary sources accurately. It outlines different types of primary sources and content analysis methods. Specifically, contextual analysis considers the time, place, author's background and intent. Primary sources provide different perspectives on historical events. The document provides examples of analyzing primary sources, noting biases from the author's loyalty and circumstances of writing. Overall, primary sources are valuable to understand Philippine history if their content and context are critically analyzed.
Original Title
CONTENT AND CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS OF PRIMARY SOURCES
This document discusses analyzing primary sources in Philippine history. It explains that understanding the historical context is key to interpreting primary sources accurately. It outlines different types of primary sources and content analysis methods. Specifically, contextual analysis considers the time, place, author's background and intent. Primary sources provide different perspectives on historical events. The document provides examples of analyzing primary sources, noting biases from the author's loyalty and circumstances of writing. Overall, primary sources are valuable to understand Philippine history if their content and context are critically analyzed.
This document discusses analyzing primary sources in Philippine history. It explains that understanding the historical context is key to interpreting primary sources accurately. It outlines different types of primary sources and content analysis methods. Specifically, contextual analysis considers the time, place, author's background and intent. Primary sources provide different perspectives on historical events. The document provides examples of analyzing primary sources, noting biases from the author's loyalty and circumstances of writing. Overall, primary sources are valuable to understand Philippine history if their content and context are critically analyzed.
The key takeaways are that it is important to analyze both the content and context of primary sources to properly understand their meaning and significance. Learning the historical context is critical to avoid misinterpreting the primary source. Different types of analysis, both conceptual and relational, can be done on various kinds of primary sources including written, oral, iconic, audio and digital texts.
The different types of primary sources discussed are written texts, oral texts, iconic texts, audio texts, and hypertexts/digital texts.
The different types of analysis that can be done on primary sources are conceptual analysis, relational analysis, contextual analysis, content analysis, external criticism, and internal criticism.
UNIT II
CONTENT AND CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS OF PRIMARY SOURCES OVERVIEW
LEARNING THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT OF A PRIMARY
SOURCE IS CRITICAL FOR UNDERSTANDING THE ATTITUDES AND INFLUENCES THAT SHAPED THE CREATION OF THE PRIMARY CAUSE. IF NOT PLACED INTO A HISTORICAL CONTEXT, A PRIMARY SOURCE’S TRUE MEANING MIND BE MISINTERPRETED. LEARNING OBJECTIVES
✓Analyze the context and perspective of different kinds of
primary sources; ✓Determine the contribution of different types of primary sources in understanding Philippine History; and ✓Develop critical and analytical skills with exposure to primary sources. HISTORICAL METHOD
It is the process of critical examining and
analysing the records of the past and survivals of the past. (Gottschalk, 1969) HISTORICAL ANALYSIS
Collect Examine the
Select the probable sources Exact subject to sources of genuiness, in credible investigate information part of in “particulars” on the whole subject CONTENT ANALYSIS
It is a systematic evaluation of the primary
source that enable an individual to present and develop an argument based on his own understanding of the evidences from his readings FIVE TYPES OF TEXTS IN CONTENT ANALYSIS
1. Written text, such as books and papers
2. Oral text, such as speech and theatrical performance 3. Iconic text, such as drawings, paintings, and icons 4. Audio text, such as TV programs, movies, and videos 5. Hypertexts, which are texts found on the internet TYPES OF CONTENT ANALYSIS
1.Conceptual Analysis can be thought of as
establishing the existence and frequency of concepts in a text. 2.Relational analysis builds on conceptual analysis by examining the relationships among concepts in a text. CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS
It is consider specifically the time, place,
situation when the primary sources was written. The analysis as well includes the author’s background.,authority on the subject and intent perceptible, and its relevance and meaning to people and society today. IDENTIFICATION OF THE HISTORICAL IMPORTANCE OF TEXTS
Primary historical sources are essential in
understanding the political, economic, social and cultural aspects of the Philippine History IDENTIFICATION OF THE HISTORICAL IMPORTANCE OF TEXTS
First-hand accounts written or in audivisual or
digital form have provided different perspectives on specific historical events. SAMPLE ANALYSIS
In September 18, 1986, a former
President, Corazon Aquino, stood before the U.S Congress in what is considered one of the most important political and diplomatic events in Philippines History. HISTORICAL CRITICISM EXTERNAL CRITICISM INTERNAL CRITICISM
• Process of verifying • Examination of the content
historical evidence through of the material, including its physical characteristics, its truthfulness. • Analyzing its material with • Author’s analysis of the source, its context when it was made the Period, it was or written, and its possible produced. agenda or intended purpose, among others SAMPLE ANALYSIS Analysis of Antonio Pigafetta’s First Voyage Around the World.
The Chronicles document Magellan’s
arrival the Visayas,his interaction with locals and his death, and his fleet’s subsequent departure. That This Photo by Unknown Author is said, no primary source should be exempt from scrutiny. licensed under CC BY-SA SAMPLE ANALYSIS Antonio Pigafetta was an Italian nobleman commissioned by Spain’s king to document the Spanish empire’s expansion.His loyalties and social standing. Compounded with the circumstance of the-text production,influenced his narrative of pre-colonial Philippines. This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA Primary sources are valuable tools to develop an understanding of Philippine History. Analyzing the content and context behind these sources can lead to critical appraisal of certain situations or period in the country’s history. THE END PREPARED BY : JAY RICHARD ADELANTAR