Scribd
Upload
48 views1 page

Rubrics in Reflection Writing

The document provides a rubric for evaluating reflection papers with elements scored from 1-3. A score of 3 indicates a clear introduction of the topic with thorough explanation, analysis, evidence from relevant sources, and strong organization. Transitional language is used skillfully. Instructions are followed and the paper is submitted on time. A score of 2 means the topic is introduced but focus or analysis lacks depth. Evidence may not be fully relevant and organization needs improvement. A score of 1 signifies an unclear topic with little analysis, evidence or organization, and failure to follow instructions or meet deadlines.

Uploaded by

Joan Doctor
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
48 views1 page

Rubrics in Reflection Writing

The document provides a rubric for evaluating reflection papers with elements scored from 1-3. A score of 3 indicates a clear introduction of the topic with thorough explanation, analysis, evidence from relevant sources, and strong organization. Transitional language is used skillfully. Instructions are followed and the paper is submitted on time. A score of 2 means the topic is introduced but focus or analysis lacks depth. Evidence may not be fully relevant and organization needs improvement. A score of 1 signifies an unclear topic with little analysis, evidence or organization, and failure to follow instructions or meet deadlines.

Uploaded by

Joan Doctor
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Manuel L.

Quezon Senior High School


Jose Abad Santos Avenue, Tondo, Manila
S.Y 2020-2021

Personal Development
RUBRICS IN REFLECTION PAPER

Element 3 2 1
Topic Clearly introduces the topic. Introduces the topic but the focus is Topic is unclear.
unclear.
Explanation and Analysis Clear and concise explanation and Explanation and analysis attempt to Little to no explanation or analysis of
analysis that thoroughly discusses the discuss the information but is unclear the information presented.
information presented. or lacks depth.
Evidence Thoroughly develops the topic with Attempts to develop the topic with Little to no facts, concrete details,
relevant facts, concrete details, facts, concrete details, and examples, quotations, or examples included.
quotations, and examples. but some of the information is not
relevant.
Organization of ideas and transitions Strong organization and transitional Attempts to organize ideas, but Little to no attempt of organization.
language used skillfully throughout. transitional language is needed.
Mechanics and timeliness All instructions were followed Some instructions were followed; Not following instructions; did not
carefully; Submitted the output on Submitted the output on time. submit the output on time
time.

Prepared by:

JOAN R. DOCTOR

You might also like