SG Qa 09 PDF
SG Qa 09 PDF
SG Qa 09 PDF
AERB/NPP/SG/QA-9
GUIDE NO. AERB/NPP/SG/QA-9
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
September 2006
Price:
i
For aspects not covered in this guide, applicable and acceptable national and
international standards, codes and guides applicable and acceptable to AERB should
be followed. Non-radiological aspects of industrial safety and environmental protection
are not explicitly considered. Industrial safety is to be ensured through compliance
with the applicable provisions of the Factories Act, 1948 and the Atomic Energy
(Factories) Rules, 1996.
This guide has been prepared by specialists in the field drawn from Atomic Energy
Regulatory Board, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic
Research and Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited and other consultants. It has
been reviewed by the relevant AERB Advisory Committee on Codes and Guides and
the Advisory Committee on Nuclear Safety.
AERB wishes to thank all individuals and organisations who have prepared and reviewed
the draft and helped in its finalisation. The list of persons, who have participated in this
task, along with their affiliations, is included for information.
(S.K. Sharma)
Chairman, AERB
ii
DEFINITIONS
Assessment
Systematic evaluation of the arrangements, processes, activities and related results for
their adequacy and effectiveness in comparison with set criteria.
Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB)
A national authority designated by the Government of India having the legal authority
for issuing regulatory consent for various activities related to the nuclear and radiation
facility and to perform safety and regulatory functions, including their enforcement for
the protection of site personnel, the public and the environment against undue radiation
hazards.
Audit
A documented activity performed to determine by investigation, examination and
evaluation of objective evidence, the adequacy of, and adherence to applicable codes,
standards, specifications, established procedures, instructions, administrative or
operational programmes and other applicable documents, and the effectiveness of their
implementation.
Commencement of Operation of Nuclear Power Plant
The specific activity/activities in the commissioning phase of a nuclear power plant
towards first approach to criticality, starting from fuel loading.
Commissioning
The process during which structures, systems and components of a nuclear or radiation
facility, on being constructed, are made functional and verified in accordance with
design specifications and found to have met the performance criteria.
Construction
The process of manufacturing, testing and assembling the components of a nuclear or
radiation facility, the erection of civil works and structures, the installation of
components and equipment and the performance of associated tests.
Contractor
An individual or organisation rendering service (e.g. design, construction, inspection,
review, maintenance and/or supplying items).
Decommissioning
The process by which a nuclear or radiation facility is finally taken out of operation in
a manner that provides adequate protection to the health and safety of the workers, the
public and the environment.
iii
Documentation
Recorded or pictorial information describing, defining, specifying, reporting or certifying
activities, requirements, procedures or results.
Document Control
The act of assuring that documents are reviewed for adequacy, approved for release by
authorised personnel and distributed to and used at the location where the prescibed
activity is performed.
Grading (QA)
Category or rank given to entities having the same functional use but different
requirements for quality.
Inspection
Quality control actions, which by means of examination, observation or measurement,
determine the conformance of materials, parts, components, systems, structures as well
as processes and procedures with predetermined quality requirements.
Item
A general term covering structures, systems, components, parts or materials.
Nuclear Safety
The achievement of proper operating conditions, prevention of accidents or mitigation
of accident consequences, resulting in protection of site personnel, the public and the
environment from undue radiation hazards.
Operation
All activities following and prior to commissioning performed to achieve, in a safe
manner, the purpose for which a nuclear/radiation facility is constructed, including
maintenance.
Quality
The totality of features and characteristics of an item or service that have the ability to
satisfy stated or implied needs.
Quality Assurance (QA)
Planned and systematic actions necessary to provide the confidence that an item or
service will satisfy given requirements for quality.
Quality Control (QC)
Quality assurance actions, which provide means to control and measure the
characteristics of an item, process or facility in accordance with the established
requirements.
iv
Records
Documents, which furnish objective evidence of the quality of items and activities
affecting quality. They include logging of events and other measurements.
Responsible Organisation
An organisation having overall responsibility for siting, design, construction,
commissioning, operation and decommissioning of a facility.
Review
Documented, comprehensive and systematic evaluation of the fulfillment of
requirements, identification of issues, if any.
Safety
(See ‘Nuclear Safety’).
Site
The area containing the facility defined by a boundary and under effective control of
the facility management.
Siting
The process of selecting a suitable site for a facility including appropriate assessment
and definition of the related design bases.
Specification
A written statement of requirements to be satisfied by a product, a service, a material or
a process, indicating the procedure by means of which it may be determined whether
the specified requirements are satisfied.
Supplier
An individual or organisation under contract for furnishing items or services. This
includes various levels or kinds of procurement, e.g. as undertaken by vendors, sellers,
contractors, sub-contractors, fabricators and consultants.
Testing (QA)
The determination or verification of the capability of an item to meet specified
requirements by subjecting the item to a set of physical, chemical, environmental or
operational conditions.
Validation
The process of determining whether a product or service is adequate to perform its
intended function satisfactorily.
v
Verification
The act of reviewing, inspecting, testing, checking, auditing, or otherwise determining
and documenting whether items, processes, services or documents conform to specified
requirements.
Vendor
A design, contracting or manufacturing organisation supplying a service, component
or facility.
vi
CONTENTS
FOREWORD ...................................................................................... i
1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................... 1
1.1 General .......................................................................... 1
1.2 Objective ...................................................................... 1
1.3 Scope ............................................................................ 1
BIBLIOGRAPHY ...................................................................................... 34
1.1 General
1.1.1 This safety guide is part of the AERB’s set of codes and guides for assurance
of safety in nuclear power plants. It gives requirements and recommendations
for document control and records management of any organisation engaged
in performing work affecting safety in nuclear power plants. The basic
requirements for document control and records are given in AERB Code of
Practice on Quality Assurance for Safety in Nuclear Power Plants-AERB Code
No. SC/QA, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code’.
1.1.2 Methods and solutions for fulfilling the basic requirements of the Code other
than those set out in this safety guide may be acceptable provided they result
in at least the same level of nuclear safety.
1.2 Objective
This safety guide provides recommendations on acceptable ways to fulfil the
basic requirements of the Code on document control and records, with respect
to preparation, review, approval, control, issuance, distribution, storage and
maintenance.
1.3 Scope
This safety guide applies to the quality assurance (QA) programme of the
responsible organisation (RO), i.e. the organisation having overall responsibility
for the nuclear power plant, as well as to QA programmes of participating
organisations in each stage of a nuclear power plant and covers items, services
and processes impacting nuclear safety. It may, with appropriate modifications,
if required, also be usefully applied at nuclear installations other than nuclear
power plants.
1
2. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
2.1 General
1.1.1 For each nuclear power plant, a document control system shall be established
which should provide for the preparation, review, approval, issuance,
distribution, revision, validation, suspension and cancellation, storage and
retention, and retrieval of documents essential to the management, performance
and verification of work.
2.1.2 In the document control system, the responsibilities of each participating
organisation or functional organisation position should be defined and
documented.
2.1.3 The types of documents include, but are not limited to design documents and
documents pertaining to QA programme, safety requirements, calculations,
computer codes, drawings, purchase orders and related documents, supplier
documents (supplier means an individual or organisation under contract for
furnishing items or services), work instructions, inspection instructions,
inspection and test reports, assessment reports, maintenance and operating
procedures.
2.1.4 Management should identify the documents needed to perform the various
processes in the organisation and should provide guidance to the organisation
and personnel preparing them. The guidance should cover aspects such as
scope, contents, policies, applicable codes and standards, type, hierarchy,
stage of the document etc.. The guidance should take into consideration
feedback of experience. It should be recognised that additional or new
documents may become necessary as a result of plant modification or as a
result of assessment of existing processes. The guidance should also highlight
the need to indicate the status of the document such as preliminary, released
for information or for implementation, voided/superseded, etc.
2.1.5 Management should establish a document control centre at responsible
organisation (RO) as well as its constituent units for issuance, distribution
and maintenance of documents.
2.2 Grading1
2.2.1 Nuclear safety is the fundamental consideration in the identification of the
items, services and processes to which the QA programme applies. A graded
approach, based on the relative importance to nuclear safety of each item,
______________________________
1
For further guidance see IAEA Technical Report Series No.328 on ‘Grading of Quality
Assurance Requirements’.
2
service or process, shall be used. The graded approach should reflect a
planned and recognised difference in the applications of specific QA
requirements.
2.2.2 Aspects of document control and records management that could be graded
include:
- The need to apply controls to the preparation of documents and
records.
- The need and extent of validation.
- The degree of review and the level of persons involved.
- The level of approval.
- The need for distribution lists.
- The types of documents which can be supplemented by temporary
documents.
- The need to archive superseded documents.
- The need to categorise, register, index, retrieve and store document
records.
- The retention time of records.
- The responsibilities for the disposal of records.
- The types of storage media.
2.2.3 Grading identification should be clearly marked on the document to enable all
downstream activities to adopt appropriate QA requirements.
3
3. DOCUMENT CONTROL
3.1 General
3.1.1 Management should use a document control procedure applicable to all its
constituent organisations and units as part of its QA programme.
3.2 Preparation of Documents
3.2.1 When documents are in their preparatory phase, they should be marked and
controlled so that their draft status clearly distinguishes them from issued
documents.
3.2.2 An appropriate document identification system should be established. Each
document should be uniquely identified.
3.2.3 Standard forms should be identified and controlled, whether these are stand
alone or are part of another document.
3.2.4 The need for traceability of a document to related hardware or software should
be determined.
3.2.5 During preparation, activities described by the documents should be assessed
using the grading system, so that the appropriate controls are chosen and
included.
3.2.6 The preparation of document shall be done by knowledgeable and identified
individuals.
3.2.7 The document prepared should be legible.
3.3 Review of Documents and Confirmation of Acceptability
3.3.1 Documents shall be reviewed before issue. The review should comprise a
critical examination of the need for and the adequacy of the document, against
prescribed requirements, guidelines and relevant modifications taking into
account the safety significance of the document.
3.3.2 The document review system should identify the organisations or individuals
responsible for reviewing the documents. The individuals responsible for
preparation and review should be different.
3.3.3 The reviewing organisation or individuals shall have access to the relevant
information upon which to base an effective review and to ensure that safety
considerations are adequately addressed.
3.3.4 The reviewing organisation or individuals shall be competent in the specific
topic they are being asked to review.
4
3.3.5 A record of review shall be prepared showing the date of the review, the
reviewer(s) and the outcome. The outcome of the review shall be considered
and satisfactorily resolved.
3.3.6 One aspect of review involves validating the implementation of the document
through simulation, mock-up, walk-throughs or the like. This validating
process is usually applied to significant working level instructions and
procedures.
3.4 Approval of Documents
3.4.1 Documents shall be approved according to a prescribed method before they
are issued for use. The responsibilities for approval should be clearly defined
by the management.
3.4.2 Where acceptance by, or approval of, AERB (see AERB Code No.SC/G) is
required, this should be obtained before the document is issued for use.
3.5 Issue and Distribution of Documents
3.5.1 A document issue and distribution system should be established, utilising
up-to-date distribution lists. Those participating in an activity shall be aware
of, have access to, and use the documents, which have been approved for
performing the activity. The system shall ensure that changes to documents
are communicated simultaneously to all relevant/affected persons and
organisations. Controlled copies are subject to revision update. They are
distributed according to document control procedure and should be identified
at the time of distribution by distinct identification.
3.5.2 The issued documents should be marked so that their use becomes clear,
especially if their use is restricted to a specific purpose. Examples of marking
include the indication that the document is approved for use in engineering,
procurement, manufacturing, construction or operation.
3.5.3 The system for distributing and storing documents should be secure.
3.5.4 To preclude the use of non-applicable documents and to ensure control of
current documents, the distributor may employ an appropriate
acknowledgement system. This would require the recipient to indicate receipt
of the document and to return or dispose off the previous issue/revision by
destroying or stamping the document suitably.
3.5.5 Master copies of documents should be retained until they are superseded or
withdrawn. The need to archive master copies of superseded documents
should be considered.
3.5.6 Uncontrolled copies (copies which are not controlled copies and circulated
for ‘information only’) of documents may be supplied, provided they clearly
5
indicate they are not subject to intimation for document revision.
Implementation shall not be taken up based on such documents.
3.5.7 Revision status of document should be clearly identified and a master list
established to identify such revision. Authorised agency to maintain the
master list should be identified.
3.6 Temporary Documents
3.6.1 Under certain circumstances, a temporary document may be required to cover
an activity for a limited period. This will be necessary when an immediate
amendment to an existing document cannot be justified.
3.6.2 Temporary documents should be subject to the same controls as permanent
documents. Temporary documents should have a defined period of validity.
When this period expires the document should be withdrawn or integrated
into an appropriate document or the temporary period of validity should be
renewed.
3.7 Document Change Control
3.7.1 Changes to documents shall be subject to the same level of review and approval
as the original documents. Changes to documents are to be reviewed and
approved by the same organisation(s) that performed the original review and
approval unless some other organisation(s) is/are designated by the RO.
3.7.2 The reviewing and approving individual(s)/organisation shall have access to
pertinent background data or information upon which to base their review or
approval.
3.7.3 A modification to one document may affect other document(s). Affected
documents should be identified and revised accordingly.
3.7.4 Modifications to documents should be highlighted in the document(s) by the
use of sidelining or other suitable means.
3.8 Suspension or Cancellation of a Document
3.8.1 When a document is suspended or cancelled, it should be removed from use.
3.8.2 Suspension and cancellation notices should uniquely identify the reference
and issue numbers of the document to which they apply and give their effective
date of application and reasons for suspension/cancellation. In the case of
suspension notices, the duration of suspension should also be provided.
3.8.3 Suspensions and cancellation notices should be distributed to all controlled
copy holders, to preclude the use of suspended or cancelled document(s).
6
3.9 Documents External to the Responsible Organisation
3.9.1 A registration system should be established and maintained to record and
control the receipt of documents and amendments to documents, which are
generated and controlled externally.
3.9.2 The system should, as a minimum, register the receipt date of the document,
its reference number, title, date of issue and/or issue status and the person or
persons to whom it was passed for distribution or if appropriate, assessment.
3.9.3 Documents from external sources should be reviewed by designated personnel
to ensure their suitability before acceptance and use.
3.10 Document Archives
3.10.1 When documents which were subjected to the formal issue process are
withdrawn from use, the master copies should be archived as records wherever
required, following the guidance of Section 4.
3.10.2 An appropriate storage system should be established and maintained (see
Annexure-I and II).
7
4. ESTABLISHMENT OF A RECORDS SYSTEM
4.1 General
4.1.1 An appropriate records system shall be established and implemented by the
RO. The records system should ensure that records are specified, prepared,
authenticated and maintained, as required by applicable codes, standards and
specifications. Examples are records of siting, design, construction,
commissioning, operation and decommissioning. The records should include
the results of inspections, tests, reviews, assessments, monitoring of work
performance and material analysis; test materials and specimens; plant operation
logs and related data such as training and qualifications and other appropriate
data.
4.1.2 The responsibilities for maintaining and operating the records system should
be clearly defined and documented.
4.1.3 The records systems should ensure that records are:
· categorised
· registered upon receipt
· readily retrievable
· indexed and placed in their proper location within the record facility
files with the retention time clearly identified
· stored in a controlled environment
· corrected or supplemented to reflect the actual plant status
· properly disposed off.
4.1.4 A master list with all categorised records indicating latest status should be
maintained.
4.2 Categorisation of Records
4.2.1 Records should be categorised as permanent or non-permanent according to
their importance to safety. An example of a system used for categorisation is
provided in Annexure-III.
4.2.2 Records, which meet one or more of the following, may be considered as
permanent.
· Describing the as-manufactured condition of items accepted for use
in the installation;
· Describing the as-built condition of the installation;
· Providing evidence that the nuclear installation has been tested and
commissioned in accordance with the design intent;
8
· Providing required baseline data for in-service inspection;
· Demonstrating capability for safe operation;
· Demonstrating that staff are competent to perform their work;
· Demonstrating that the plant is being operated, tested and inspected
in accordance with design requirements and approved instructions;
· Demonstrating that the plant is being maintained in accordance with
design requirements and the approved maintenance programme and
instructions;
· Confirming design reliability assessment by plant performance history;
· Demonstrating compliance with statutory and regulatory requirements;
· Providing information for maintenance, rework, repair, replacement or
modification of an item including the details on spares;
· Demonstrating that the quality of originally installed or replacement
items meets the specified requirements
· Providing information for decommissioning
· Recording the investigation of an accident, malfunction or non-
conformance.
4.2.3 Records such as QA programmatic documentation, QA procedures and
assessment reports should be considered as non-permanent.
4.3 Administration of Records
4.3.1 The applicable design specifications, procurement documents, construction
procedures, test procedures, operational procedures or other documents
should specify the records to be generated by, supplied to, or held for the RO.
Such records should be considered valid only if dated, stamped, initialled,
signed or otherwise authenticated by authorised personnel. They may be
originals or reproduced copies. The copying of records from one medium to
another may result in the records not being legally admissible. The records
system should therefore ensure that records are kept in the appropriate medium
and that copying to maintain image quality during the storage time is
adequately controlled. All records should be legible, complete, identifiable to
the item, service or process involved and made of appropriate material to
resist deterioration for the required retention time.
4.3.2 Records in the form of hard copy alone should be considered valid unless the
records in the devices such as micro-diskettes and laser discs are authenticated
with electronic signatures appropriately by the RO.
9
4.3.3 Records should be listed in an index which indicates:
· The title or unique identification of the record and the item, service or
process it is related to
· The organisation or person generating the record
· Date of generation of the record
· The retention time of the record
· Storage medium of record
· The location of the record in the storage location
· Revision dates and the persons approving the revisions
The method of indexing should be established before receipt of the record.
The index should provide sufficient information to identify both the item and
the relevant record.
4.3.4 The RO should specify retention times for all records. Annexure-IV describes
a process for the allocation of retention times.
4.3.5 Guidance is given in Annexure-I on the choice of storage media for the different
record retention times.
4.3.6 When records are to be corrected or supplemented, the organisation originating
the records should review the correction for approval. When this is not
possible, another authorised person or organisation should be assigned.
4.3.7 The correction or supplement should include the date and the identification of
the person making the correction or supplement.
4.4 Receipt of Records
4.4.1 Management should devise the methodology and establish a plan for the
receipt of records and ensure that records are available at the required time.
4.4.2 The receipt control of records should ensure that the records are complete,
legible and in a form suitable for storage.
4.5 Retrieval and Accessibility
4.5.1 Records shall be indexed, filed, stored and maintained in facilities which allow
ready retrieval when required.
4.5.2 The records should be accessible during the specified retention time. Access
to retention locations should be controlled.
4.5.3 Consideration should be given to the off-site storage and/or access to
documents that would be required in emergency conditions.
10
4.6 Storage and Preservation
4.6.1 The RO should establish storage and location requirements for the
maintenance, preservation and protection of records and associated test
materials and specimens from the time of receipt until their disposal. A record
storage system should include the following:
· Description of the document or record storage facility. Examples of
storage facilities are given in Annexure-II.
· Description of the filing system to be used.
· A method for verifying that the records received are in agreement
with the transmittal document and that the records are in good
condition;
· A method for verifying that the identification of records agree with
the index of records;
· Rules governing access to, and control of, the files;
· A method for maintaining control of accountability for records removed
from the storage facility;
· A method for filing corrected or supplementary information and
voiding or disposing off of records that have been superseded;
· Periodic checking to ensure that the records are not damaged,
deteriorated or missing.
4.6.2 Continued ability to read the data must be assured, taking into account any
technological changes that may occur.
4.6.3 Records shall be stored in such a manner as to prevent deterioration. Examples
of storage methods for different storage media are given in Annexure-II.
4.6.4 Paper records should be firmly attached in binders, or placed in folders or
envelopes for storage on shelves or in containers. Steel file cabinets or safes
are preferred.
4.6.5 Records which are processed by special methods should be packaged and
stored as recommended by the manufacturer’s instructions, in line with
applicable standards. Examples are: radiographs, photographs, microfilm,
magnetic tapes, micro -diskettes, laser discs and those records which might be
sensitive to light, pressure, humidity, magnetic fields, dust and temperature.
Special requirements for the packaging and storage of test materials and
specimens should be taken into account. When the records are stored in
devices such as micro-diskettes and laser discs, guide note indicating the
version, procedure for usage etc. should be provided.
11
4.6.6 Records which are stored electronically should have as long a life span as
possible. Electronic records shall be re-written periodically depending on the
life span of the electronic storage media as per the specification of the electronic
records. Everytime an archive is re-written, the user has to decide between
keeping the old files as they are or converting to a more up-to-date medium
considering such factors as accessibility, readability, durability and the
preservation of authenticity.
4.6.7 Record storage facilities should protect the contents from possible damage or
destruction by such causes as fire, flooding, insects and rodents and from
possible deterioration by adverse environmental conditions such as light,
temperature and humidity.
4.6.8 Amongst others, the following features should be considered in the
construction of a storage facility:
· Location and security
· Type of construction, including structural features and internal surface
treatment.
· Pipe work layout and drainage
· Ventilation, temperature and humidity control
· Fire prevention, detection and fighting
· Electromagnetic protection
Where it is not practicable to provide suitable storage conditions, consideration
should be given to the provision of a duplicate set of records stored in a
separate facility. In that case, the location and construction features of both
facilities should be such that the probability of simultaneous destruction, loss
or deterioration of records is sufficiently low.
4.7 Inspection of Records
4.7.1 Inspection of the record storage facility shall be done at least once a year to
ensure that :
(a) the facility is adequate and that necessary environmental and other
protective measures are in effect; and
(b) the records have been updated based on data resulting from plant
maintenance, repair, modifications and/or replacement of items.
4.7.2 Sampling inspection of records shall be done at least once a year to check
aspects such as receipt control, retrievability and also to ensure that records
are not deteriorating due to improper handling or storage practices.
12
4.8 Disposal
4.8.1 The RO should identify who is responsible for transfer or disposal of records.
4.8.2 Upon transfer of the records, the RO or its designated person should
acknowledge their receipt and process them. Access to records accumulated
at locations not under the control of the RO should be agreed.
4.8.3 Records categorised in accordance with sub-section 4.2.1 to 4.2.3 should be
retained for the minimum period specified by the RO. After this period these
records may be disposed off by, or with the agreement of the RO.
13
ANNEXURE - I
14
ANNEXURE - I (CONTD.)
15
ANNEXURE - II
A-2.1 General
All quality documents and records should be securely stored and maintained
in such a way that they are readily retrievable in facilities that provide a suitable
environment to minimise deterioration or damage and to prevent loss.
The type of storage facilities required depends on factors such as the records
media, environmental conditions (including insect or fungal infestation and
rodent), safety significance (duplication of copies in diverse locations), duration
of retention and security.
Records should be retained in facilities appropriate to the media. Care should
be taken to ensure that record media requiring different storage environments
are not stored in the same area. In particular, cellulose nitrate film should be
stored in a separate facility.
Unsuitable environments can cause more damage to records than any other
single factor. A dry or polluted atmosphere may lead to embrittlement of
documents; dampness and poor ventilation may cause the growth of mould;
excess heat may accelerate chemical damage. All three conditions can lead to
irreparable damage to records. Careful control and observation of temperature,
humidity and ventilation within the records facility is therefore essential. In
general, low temperatures with adequate air movement are preferable.
Fire precautions, including limitations on the distance to reach means of escape
and the physical dimensions of the storage facility, are the subject of national
legislation and local by-laws. The fire precautions adopted, however, should
be designed to protect the contents and structure of the facility from damage
caused by fire fighting operations, as well as to ensure the safety of staff and
limit the fire to its source. The possibility of fires or explosions in adjacent
facilities and the proposed type of fire fighting chemicals to be employed to
counter such events should be taken into account when the facility is chosen.
Loose material should not be permitted and smoking should be prohibited at
all times in the storage facility.
Precautions should be taken during the storage and handling of records to
avoid finger marks, dust or scratching on microfilm records (by the provision
of suitable hand covering), unnecessary bending or cracking of paper (by the
suitable positioning on adequately designed storage) and failure of
components due to static discharge (by the provision of static handling
precautions).
16
ANNEXURE - II (CONTD.)
17
ANNEXURE - II (CONTD.)
18
ANNEXURE - II (CONTD.)
19
ANNEXURE - II (CONTD.)
20
ANNEXURE - III
This Annexure indicates examples of types and retention categories of records of safety
related items and activities. It is recognised that the nomenclature and type of records
may vary from organisation to organisation and alternative categories may be chosen
at the discretion of the RO. In general, procedures are classified as non-permanent and
results are classified as permanent, on the basis that the recorded results can be
interpreted without recourse to the procedures. However, where interpretation of the
results depends on knowledge of the procedure, both should be classified as permanent.
Permanent records are those whose retention time is 30 years or more from date of
operation or lifetime of the plant, whichever is more. For retention period of non-
permanent records refer Annexure IV.
TYPE OF RECORDS CATEGORIES
Permanent Non-Permanent
1. Design Records
Design basis information (DBI) *
Detailed project report (DPR) *
As built drawings *
Codes and standards in design *
Design calculations *
Design change requests *
Design change notices (DCNs), Field change *
notices (FCN)
Engineering change notices (ECNs) *
Design drawings *
QA manual, design procedures and manual *
Design basis report (DBR) *
Design notes (DN) *
Records of check and review of design documents, *
design review meetings
Technical specifications *
QA audit reports *
Preliminary safety analysis report (PSAR) *
Final safety analysis report (FSAR) *
21
ANNEXURE - III (CONTD.)
22
ANNEXURE - III (CONTD.)
23
ANNEXURE - III (CONTD.)
24
ANNEXURE - III (CONTD.)
25
ANNEXURE - III (CONTD.)
26
ANNEXURE - III (CONTD.)
27
ANNEXURE - III (CONTD.)
28
ANNEXURE - III (CONTD.)
29
ANNEXURE - III (CONTD.)
30
ANNEXURE - IV
(Section 4.3.4)
Type of record
(See Annexure-III)
activities?
Is the record No
permanent ?
Identify the need
No Yes for record taking
structures,systems
Retention purpose (Table IV.1) and components
(2) Enable routine patrols/checks and repair
No
31
TABLE - IV.1. RETENTION PURPOSE OF QUALITY
RECORDS
32
TABLE IV. 2. RETENTION TIME OF NON-PERMANENT
RECORDS
33
BIBLIOGRAPHY
34
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS
35
ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR SAFETY (ACNS)
36
PROVISIONAL LIST OF SAFETY CODE AND GUIDES
ON QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR SAFETY IN
NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
37
AERB SAFETY GUIDE NO. AERB/NPP/SG/QA-9