Neuroimagen en La Esclerosis Lateral Amiotrófica Usos Actuales y Emergentes
Neuroimagen en La Esclerosis Lateral Amiotrófica Usos Actuales y Emergentes
Neuroimagen en La Esclerosis Lateral Amiotrófica Usos Actuales y Emergentes
To cite this article: Federica Agosta, Edoardo Gioele Spinelli & Massimo Filippi (2018):
Neuroimaging in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: current and emerging uses, Expert Review of
Neurotherapeutics, DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2018.1463160
1. Neuroimaging Research Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele
t
University, Milan, Italy.
ip
2. Department of Neurology, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, San
cr
Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
us
Corresponding author:
an
Federica Agosta,
M
Neuroimaging Research Unit,
Division of Neuroscience,
pt
20132 Milan,
Italy
E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract
Introduction: Several neuroimaging techniques have been used to define in vivo markers of
pathological alterations underlying amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Growing evidence supports
the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) for the non-
t
ip
Areas covered: A comprehensive overview of structural and functional neuroimaging applications
in ALS is provided, focusing on motor and extra-motor involvement in the brain and the spinal
cr
cord. Implications for pathogenetic models, patient diagnosis, prognosis, monitoring and the design
us
of clinical trials are discussed.
ALS, with relevance for both pathophysiologic investigation and clinical practice. Network-based
M
analysis of structural and functional connectivity alterations and multimodal approaches combining
several neuroimaging measures are promising tools for the development of novel diagnostic and
ed
Keywords: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; magnetic resonance imaging; atrophy; white matter
ce
damage; resting state functional connectivity; positron emission tomography; spinal cord imaging;
network analysis.
Ac
1. Introduction
by progressive damage to upper motor neurons (UMN) in the cortex and lower motor neurons
(LMN) in the brainstem and spinal cord. From a clinical standpoint, patients with ALS greatly
differ in terms of site of onset, differential UMN and LMN involvement, degree of extra-motor –
t
ip
syndromes partially overlapping with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) with different prognostic
impact at the individual level [1]. Neuropathological studies identified cytoplasmic inclusions of
cr
ubiquitin-positive Transactive Response DNA Binding Protein 43 (TDP-43) as the molecular
us
hallmark in up to 98% of ALS cases [2], following a progressive spreading pattern that has been
classified into sequential stages [3]. Despite this unifying pathological feature, significant genetic
an
heterogeneity parallels the great variability in clinical presentations, both in familial and sporadic
cases [4]. Currently, no curative treatment is available for ALS. It has been suggested that the
M
difficulty to enroll patients in early phases of the disease using current diagnostic tools, together
with the well-known disease heterogeneity, might explain the high failure rate of pharmacological
ed
multifold purpose: first, to allow an early diagnosis with high sensitivity and specificity, particularly
ce
when the so-called ‘ALS-mimic disorders’ (e.g., motor neuropathies, neuromuscular transmission
disorders, radiculopathies, spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy, etc.) are in the differential diagnosis;
Ac
impairment that support a correct stratification of patients in the design of clinical trials; and third,
In recent years, several neuroimaging techniques have proven useful in the search of
markers of central nervous system (CNS) degeneration in ALS. Neuroimaging provides an ideal
frontotemporal cortical regions) that frequently underpins the development of executive and
behavioral deficits over the course of the disease, with significant prognostic implications.
Given the high number of recently published imaging papers in ALS, our aim is not to
provide an exhaustive systematic review but to discuss the current state of the art of brain and spinal
t
ip
cord neuroimaging in the study of structural and functional alterations in ALS, highlighting
potential benefits and shortcomings of the most widely used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
cr
and positron emission tomography (PET) techniques for both pathophysiologic investigation and
us
clinical practice. Moreover, we also highlight emerging developments in this field, like applications
of the graph theory in the context of network-based analyses and the ongoing effort to combine
an
multiple diagnostic/prognostic tools into multimodal approaches.
M
2. Clinical MRI
Historically, MRI has been used to exclude structural abnormalities that can mimic clinical UMN
ed
and LMN damage, both in the brain (e.g., vascular lesions, multiple sclerosis, tumors) and the
pt
spinal cord (e.g., radiculopathy, myelopathy, syringomyelia). Since the last decade of the 20th
century, some observations led to the definition of ALS-related MRI alterations, which are
ce
proton density or fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences of brain MRI has been
Ac
described in a highly variable proportion of ALS cases, ranging from 15% to 76% across different
cohorts [6]. A hypointense rim in the precentral gyrus can also be observed on T2-weighted images
of patients with ALS [6]. However, these findings are neither sufficiently sensitive nor specific for
ALS. For example, increased T2-signal intensity in the CST has also been shown in healthy
individuals and patients with hepatic failure [6]. Therefore, the visual assessment of these
alterations on brain MRI is currently not recommended for making a firm diagnosis of ALS[6].
Only recently, the application of quantitative approaches to assess FLAIR hyperintensity in the CST
of ALS patients has been suggested to provide some benefit for the diagnosis of ALS, particularly
CST involvement can also be detected using conventional MRI of the spinal cord, as T2 and
T1 hyperintensities have been shown in the anterolateral columns of the cervical cord of patients
with ALS [6]. Cord hyperintensities provided higher specificity compared with intensity alterations
t
ip
on brain MRI [6]. In this context, preliminary findings using ultra-high field (7 Tesla) MRI has
recently shown some potential to detect signal abnormalities in the spinal CST of ALS patients with
cr
high accuracy [8] (Figure 1).
us
3. Advanced brain neuroimaging techniques
an
3.1. Grey matter atrophy
Numerous studies assessed grey matter (GM) focal loss in patients with ALS using voxel-based
M
morphometry (VBM) on high-resolution 3D T1-weighted MRI scans. This reliable and reproducible
method provides subtle volume changes by performing a voxel-by-voxel comparison of the regional
ed
attenuation of brain GM intensity across groups of subjects. Initial VBM studies showed diverging
pt
results, with some reporting focal atrophy in motor/premotor regions [9, 10], others reporting
widespread frontotemporal GM atrophy sparing the motor cortex [11], and some reporting no
ce
significant atrophy[12]. Such variability likely results from differences in image processing
pipelines and statistical approaches. A recent meta-analysis pooled results from 29 VBM studies
Ac
comprising 638 subjects with ALS, showing significant GM volume reduction in the right
precentral gyrus and in bilateral inferior frontal cortex [13]. VBM studies have also demonstrated
different atrophy patterns for specific clinical presentations. For example, ALS patients with bulbar
and limb onset showed different GM involvement within the motor strip, consistent with their
clinical disability [14] (Figure 2). Patients with ALS and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) have
shown the most severe atrophy involving widespread frontotemporal cortical areas and the caudate
nucleus [15, 16], although significant GM loss in extensive cortical and subcortical regions -
including the caudate nucleus – has been observed also in patients with subtle cognitive and/or
behavioral impairment [17]. One longitudinal study showed a significant decrease of GM volume
over a 6-month follow-up in motor and extra-motor frontotemporal cortex, thalami, and caudate
t
ip
changes in human brain, based on the estimation of cortical thickness on T1-weighted images. This
method requires the identification of the inner and outer cortical boundaries or surfaces in order to
cr
measure the cortical thickness. One of the most popular approaches to perform this calculation is
us
provided by the Freesurfer software package (https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu, Center for
on the two surfaces. SBM studies have consistently shown significant cortical thinning in the
M
primary motor areas of patients with ALS [19, 20], with additional extra-motor involvement that
ed
was particularly severe in those with cognitive or behavioral impairment, although present even in
subjects with exclusive motor symptoms [21, 22]. Focal cortical alterations of the motor areas were
pt
found to mirror specific clinical presentation [23]. Significant associations were observed between
primary motor cortical thinning over one year and the progression of clinical disability [24].
ce
Cortical motor thinning is specific to UMN degeneration, as it was not observed in patients with
Ac
prevalent LMN involvement and ALS-mimic syndromes [25, 26]. Several studies suggested that
cortical thinning of the motor cortex can be used as a sensitive diagnostic marker of ALS at the
individual patient level [20, 27, 28]. One longitudinal SBM study demonstrated the progression of
cortical thinning over time from primary motor to frontal, temporal, and parietal regions [29]. Such
extra-motor cortical damage and its pattern of progression is consistent with postmortem studies
that have recently led to the development of a pathological staging system of ALS [3], supporting
subcortical structures, with some promising results that need further validation. Notably, the
caudate nucleus, nucleus accumbens [30], and thalamus [18] were found to be involved in patients
with ALS, consistent with neuropathological studies [3]. Volume loss in the basal ganglia has also
Cerebellar involvement shown by neuroimaging studies [32] is also in line with findings
t
ip
from postmortem studies [3]. A VBM study showed that cerebellar atrophy affects predominantly
the inferior lobules and vermis in patients with motor symptoms and the superior lobules and crus
cr
in patients with cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms [32].
us
an
WM tract alterations have been extensively investigated in patients with ALS using diffusion tensor
(DT) MRI. This technique is sensitive to the random thermal movement of water molecules
M
(Brownian motion) in neural tissues. Structures like cell walls or myelin are barriers to water
ed
diffusion, and so, by measuring the magnitude and directionality of water diffusion, it is possible to
obtain information about the microstructural integrity of brain structures. The DT model allows
pt
calculating the absolute magnitude of water diffusion, measured by mean diffusivity (MD), and the
characterized by an anisotropic diffusion of water molecules due to the linear structure of tracts,
Ac
which allows the water molecules to diffuse freely along the axons but impede their diffusion
perpendicularly to the axonal main direction because of myelin. Therefore, changes of FA and/or
MD values are used to infer damage to the microarchitectural structure of neuronal projections.
Several DT MRI studies performed in ALS patients consistently showed decreased FA and
increased MD in a “signature” WM region involving the CSTs and the middle and posterior parts of
the corpus callosum, as confirmed by a recent large multicenter study from eight sites[33]. Similar
The greatest and most widespread DT MRI alterations were found in patients with primary
lateral sclerosis, encompassing both motor and extra-motor areas and correlating with the severity
of cognitive deficits [35]. On the contrary, the least diffuse WM damage was observed in patients
with predominant LMN involvement, with diverging results from literature as to the extent and
t
ip
significance of such damage [26, 36, 37]. A recent two-center study suggested that these differences
among independent cohorts might be influenced by intrinsic clinical heterogeneity, as only patients
cr
with predominant LMN involvement and a higher rate of disease progression showed significant
us
WM damage, with a pattern resembling the one found in classic ALS [38].
pathological studies [3]. In this context, longitudinal studies are fundamental to validate current
M
views about pathological spreading in ALS in vivo and dynamically. Relatively few longitudinal DT
ed
MRI studies have been published so far, mirroring the difficulties in enrolling enough patients with
a rapidly evolving disease who could undergo an appropriate number of follow-up scans. Most of
pt
these studies focused on alterations within the motor tracts, reporting a significant progression of
CST damage in the brain after 6 to 8 months [40-42]. Although a minority of studies could not
ce
detect such longitudinal CST damage [24, 43], these inconsistencies likely derive from the
Ac
heterogeneous disease course and great variability across studies in patient sample sizes, follow-up
intervals and functional impairment at baseline. Even taking this into account, several studies
disability [41, 42]. In addition to this, progressive involvement of extra-motor frontotemporal and
More recently, another study used DT MRI to classify ALS patients according to the
involvement of WM tracts which are damaged at each neuropathological stage, showing that
individual increase in disease stage demonstrated by MRI was consistent with clinical progression
over a 6-month interval [42]. All these data support the use of DT MRI as an objective biomarker of
disease progression in ALS, although further studies describing the topographical pattern of
pathological progression and its correlation with cognitive variables and survival are still needed.
Moreover, the pathological correlates underlying WM diffusion changes in ALS are yet to be
clearly established. Ultra-high-field (7 T) MRI studies are expected to clarify this point,
t
ip
investigating the degree to which implicated factors (i.e., loss of myelinated axons, astrogliosis and
cr
us
3.3. MR spectroscopy
Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is a non-invasive method that measures the concentration
an
of specific biochemical compounds in the brain. This technique provides a spectrum rather than an
image, and can quantify spectra of many biologically important metabolites. The MR spectrum
M
consists of resonances or peaks that represent signal intensities as a function of frequency. Spectra
ed
are obtained either from one selected brain region in the case of single-voxel spectroscopy or from
multiple brain regions in the case of MR spectroscopic imaging. Proton (1H)-MRS is the most used
pt
in clinical practice, and has been used to investigate the metabolite content of brain tissue in
patients with ALS, using both single-voxel and, more recently, whole-brain approaches.
ce
Concentrations of N-acetyl aspartate (NAA) identified by proton MRS can estimate neuronal
Ac
density, whereas choline is a marker of cellular membrane turnover, creatine provides information
The most consistent MRS finding in ALS patients is a reduction in NAA relative to choline
and creatine in the motor cortex and along the entire length of the intracranial CST, down to the
brainstem [45-47]. Decreased NAA levels in the primary motor cortex were associated with greater
disability and faster disease progression [46, 47]. Whole-brain spectroscopy showed decreased
NAA concentrations in widespread cortical and subcortical areas, including the premotor and
sensory cortex, basal ganglia, thalamus, and extra-motor frontal, parietal, and occipital regions [48,
49]. NAA levels in the motor cortex have been shown to consistently decrease over 3 to 6 months in
longitudinal studies [50, 51]. However, NAA concentrations did not show a linear pattern of decline
in these studies, and their relationship with clinical progression is currently unclear. An increase in
myo-inositol levels within the motor cortex has also been demonstrated [52], consistent with gliotic
t
ip
In line with pathogenic theories of increased excitatory and decreased inhibitory signaling in
ALS, some studies found higher glutamate-glutamine [53, 54] and lower GABA concentrations [45]
cr
in the motor cortex of ALS patients compared with healthy controls. However, other studies found
us
decreased glutamate levels within the same areas [55, 56], including a recent study performed using
a 7-Tesla scanner [56], which overcomes the significant overlap between glutamate and glutamine
an
peaks observed at lower field strengths. Inconsistencies between earlier and more recent findings
might be partially due to the effects of riluzole, a glutamate release inhibitor that has been used for
M
ALS treatment since the late 1990s. Therefore, although the assessment of glutamate and GABA
ed
concentrations has provided interesting results, the use of such measures as diagnostic biomarkers
Functional MRI (fMRI) is based on the measurement of fluctuations in blood flow and blood-
Ac
paramagnetic properties of the blood. Brain regions that co-activate under resting conditions
delineate the so-called “resting-state” (RS) functional networks. The assessment of connectivity
alterations between RS networks have provided important insights into brain functional
reorganization in several neurodegenerative diseases, including ALS, in which motor and – when
ALS patients [57-59], whereas others found increased connectivity [60, 61], or complex regional
patterns of decreased and increased functional connectivity [62]. Altered functional connectivity has
also been shown in brain networks related to cognition and behavior (especially the default mode
and frontoparietal networks) [63, 64], consistent with the multisystem involvement of ALS
pathology. Based on RS fMRI findings, it has been suggested that a widespread increase in brain
t
ip
functional connectivity might prevail in earlier stages of the disease as a compensatory mechanism,
with subsequent decrease as pathological burden accumulates. Consistent with this hypothesis,
cr
increased functional connectivity was found to be higher in patients with less severe microstructural
us
damage to the CST [65], and associated with lower rate of disease progression, shorter disease
duration [64], and preserved motor function [65]. Moreover, a recent longitudinal study showed
an
consistent decreased RS functional connectivity with the sensorimotor and thalamic networks,
paralleling progression of structural alterations and clinical decline over a two-year period in ALS
M
patients [66] (Figure 4). The co-occurrent progressive increase of functional connectivity in extra-
ed
motor networks, such as the left fronto-parietal and the temporal RS networks [66], is also
consistent with a “disconnection” hypothesis due to the loss of compensation. However, some
pt
studies also showed increased functional connectivity within the regions of structural disruption in
ALS correlating with faster disease progression [60], and greater clinical and executive cognitive
ce
connectivity related to the loss of local inhibitory circuitry within the primary motor and frontal
cortex is also possible, as also suggested by MRS [67] and 11C-flumazenil PET studies [68].
Although fMRI studies have consistently shown functional reorganization in patients with
ALS, providing some hints about the underlying pathophysiological processes, results are often
contradictory and hard to interpret, and might be influenced by several factors (disease stage,
medication, etc.). Future studies enrolling larger and more homogenous cohorts are needed to
validate this technique as a tool to be applied in the clinical setting. Other emerging techniques
providing information about brain functional reorganization, including PET imaging and
transcranial magnetic stimulation) are promising tools to complement the results of fMRI studies.
Tracers labelled by radioactive isotopes are employed by PET to study the metabolism in specific
t
ip
brain areas or the density of particular receptors. Since glucose is the main source of energy for the
cr
([18F]FDG) to detect the regions of the brain where glucose uptake is low (hypometabolism) or high
us
(hypermetabolism). As for the evaluation of specific receptor density, the current availability and
continuing development of several PET radiotracers, targeting different molecular substrates, makes
an
this technique an interesting tool to investigate pathogenetic underpinnings of ALS.
The earliest PET imaging studies of cerebral glucose metabolism showed widespread
M
decreased FDG binding in the cortex and basal ganglia of ALS patients, particularly – but not
ed
exclusively – in those with greater UMN impairment [69, 70]. Frontotemporal hypometabolism was
associated with motor functional decline [70] and executive deficits [69]. Recently, these findings
pt
have been replicated in larger cohorts, demonstrating high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating
ALS patients from healthy controls using FDG PET [71, 72]. In addition to motor cortical and
ce
frontal hypometabolism, recent studies also showed increased metabolic activity in extra-motor
Ac
regions, such as the brainstem, medial temporal structures, and the cerebellum [71, 72]. Since glial
cells are the preferential site of glycolytic metabolism during brain activation, increased 18F-FDG
uptake has been related to reactive proliferation of astrocytes and microglia surrounding the
affected motor neurons and degenerating descending WM tracts in ALS patients [71].
An active role of neuroinflammation in the pathogenesis of ALS has been supported by PET
studies using radioligands binding to the translocator protein (TSPO), which is highly expressed in
activated glial cells. Increased binding of TSPO radioligands, such as 11C(R)-PK11195 and 11C-
PBR28, has been demonstrated in the primary and supplementary motor cortex, extra-motor
frontotemporal areas, thalamus, midbrain, pons and subcortical WM of patients with ALS [73, 74].
These findings are consistent with increased myo-inositol concentrations shown by MRS [52], and
indicate microglial activation and astrocytosis co-localizing with structural damage [75].
been shown in the motor/premotor cortex and extra-motor frontotemporal cortical areas of patients
t
ip
with ALS [68, 76], suggesting impaired GABAergic neurotransmission that has been correlated
with poor performance at executive tasks [77]. The recent development of PET ligands targeting
cr
glutamatergic transmission [78] might provide further insights with regards to hypothesized
us
excitotoxic alterations in ALS.
an
4. Spinal cord imaging
Volumetric studies showed cord atrophy in the cervical and upper thoracic segments of patients
M
with ALS, correlating with disease duration, measures of clinical disability and upper arm muscle
strength [79-81]. DT MRI consistently showed decreased FA and/or increased MD in the cervical
ed
cord of patients with ALS [79-82], demonstrating damage involving not only the lateral columns
pt
but also the posterior sensory pathways [79]. Diffusivity alterations were found to be more severe at
more distal cervical segments [82], and to correlate with measures of disease severity and
ce
respiratory impairment (i.e., forced vital capacity) [79-82]. Significant progression of cord atrophy
was detected over a 9- to 11-month follow-up period, closely related with clinical indicators of
Ac
functional decline [43, 80]. Another study showed relative stability of diffusivity alterations over
time [80]. The few studies assessing MRS of the cervical spinal cord in ALS showed decreased
concentrations of NAA, correlating with clinical decline and reduced forced vital capacity [83, 84].
One of these studies also showed increased myo-inositol levels, suggesting the presence of gliotic
cervical cord MRI as a tool to monitor ALS progression, as this technique is sensitive to
degeneration of both UMN and LMN. The use of high magnetic fields, recent technological
improvements providing greater contrast between GM, WM and cerebrospinal fluid, and the study
of lower spinal cord segments (i.e., thoracic and lumbar) might also help clarifying some
pathophysiological aspects of ALS, such as the differential involvement of GM and WM and the
t
ip
‘dying-back’ versus ‘dying-forward’ hypotheses – i.e., whether neurodegeneration in ALS starts in
cr
us
5. Future directions
regions that are structurally and functionally interconnected, forming many different co-operating
M
sub-networks. Graph theoretical models have conceptualized such complex organization as the
brain ‘connectome’, consisting of anatomic regions defined as ‘nodes’, which are linked by ‘edges’
ed
(i.e., structural or functional connections). Recently, neuroimaging research has focused on the
pt
study of changes in structural and functional connectivity at a brain-system level, rather than on
alterations in individual brain regions. Such approach has been already demonstrated as a powerful
ce
tool to measure structural and functional reorganization in the FTD spectrum of disorders [85], and
might be particularly helpful in the study of ALS, particularly to clarify the relationship between
Ac
Two independent studies applied network-based statistics to DT MRI of patients with ALS,
both demonstrating the presence of an impaired sub-network including bilateral primary motor
regions, bilateral supplementary motor areas, the basal ganglia and associative areas such as the
right posterior cingulate and precuneus [86, 87]. One longitudinal study has shown that the sub-
network of impaired connectivity expands over time, involving widespread frontal, temporal, and
parietal regions [88] in a way which is consistent with the proposed model of TDP-43 pathological
spreading [3]. In line with such hypothesis, a recent study evaluated brain structural connectivity in
a consistent set of healthy controls, showing that regions involved in subsequent stages of ALS
pathology are highly interconnected by WM tracts, which may serve as anatomical “infrastructures”
t
ip
ALS patients using RS fMRI, demonstrating complex connectivity alterations encompassing
frontal, temporal and occipital regions [90, 91], mirroring widespread multisystem functional
cr
reverberation of TDP-43 deposition.
us
Although the high complexity of network-based analyses complicates their application to
clinical practice, the assessment of affected sub-networks in individual patients might facilitate
an
early diagnosis, prognostic patient stratification, and provide evidence for disease mechanisms,
which ultimately should allow gaining novel targets for therapeutic interventions.
M
ed
Although a number of studies showed that a good level of diagnostic accuracy can be obtained in
pt
distinguishing ALS patients from healthy controls using cortical thickness of the precentral gyrus
[20, 25] or DT MRI measures of the motor tracts [35], each neuroimaging marker provides
ce
information about only a part of the whole pathological process affecting the CNS in ALS.
Ac
[92], might allow the highest accuracy in the correct discrimination of ALS patients, with obvious
relevance for the clinical practice. Combinations of several structural neuroimaging markers (i.e.,
DT MRI, MRS, high-resolution volumetric imaging assessing both cortical and subcortical
structures) have demonstrated diagnostic accuracies ranging from 80% to over 90% in
discriminating ALS patients and healthy controls [45, 93, 94]. A recent study evaluated the
combination of cortical thickness and DT MRI measurements in the separation of patients with ALS
and ALS-mimicking conditions, showing a 94% accuracy using such combined model [28] (Figure
5).
Multimodal sets of MRI data have also been tested as prognostic indicators in ALS,
especially for the prediction of survival in combination with clinical variables. Both the use of
multimodal brain (i.e., SBM and DT MRI of motor regions) [95] and spinal cord neuroimaging
t
ip
techniques (i.e., cord volume and diffusivity alterations) [96] provided enhanced survival prediction
in ALS, suggesting a possible relevance of this approach for clinical practice and the design of
cr
clinical trials.
us
an
The great heterogeneity of clinical presentations within the ALS spectrum is likely to mirror, at
least partially, the variability of genetic backgrounds. Therefore, the study of neuroimaging
M
alterations in ALS patients with specific underlying genetic mutations might help to characterize
ed
The most common genetic mutation in both familial and sporadic forms of ALS is the
pt
hexanucleotide expansion in the C9orf72 region [97], associated with greater prevalence of
cognitive impairment and full-blown FTD, when compared with sporadic ALS. MRI studies of
ce
ALS patients carrying C9orf72 expansions revealed more severe brain GM atrophy than patients
Ac
with sporadic ALS, involving widespread frontal, temporal, parietal and occipital cortical areas, as
well as subcortical regions such as the thalami and the cerebellum [98, 99]. DT MRI studies also
showed more diffuse involvement of WM tracts [98-100], and a recent longitudinal study
demonstrated the spreading of diffusivity alterations from anterior to posterior WM regions over a
6-month follow-up period in C9orf72 expansion carriers with ALS [100]. A recent study assessing
RS functional alterations in these patients showed rearrangements within the visual networks, likely
related to the involvement of posterior regions in this particular form of ALS [99].
The few structural MRI studies performed in SOD1 ALS patients showed a relative sparing
of brain motor networks both from a structural [101-103] and a functional [103] point of view,
when compared with sporadic ALS patients. By contrast, a recent study showed marked cervical
cord atrophy in SOD1 ALS patients [103], suggesting that pathological alterations in ALS due to
SOD1 mutations may follow different progression patterns compared with ALS cases with TDP-43
pathology.
t
ip
6. Conclusions
cr
The success of new therapies for ALS critically depends on the ability to provide new drugs at the
us
earliest possible stage with a high diagnostic certainty and capacity to stage patients in prognostic
classes. Neuroimaging has demonstrated to provide reliable markers of ALS pathological processes.
an
Several MRI and PET techniques complement each other in providing information about structural
and functional alterations in the disease course, mirroring the selective involvement of motor
M
networks in early stages and the progressive spread to extra-motor cortical and subcortical areas that
accompanies functional decline and the development of cognitive and behavioral deficits.
ed
alterations in the CNS of ALS patients correlate with motor and cognitive impairment, and provide
high diagnostic accuracy in the distinction from both healthy controls and patients with ALS-mimic
ce
disorders, especially in disease phenotypes with greater UMN involvement. Moreover, longitudinal
studies showed patterns of disease progression which are consistent with the recently proposed
Ac
neuropathological staging model [3], as early involvement of the primary motor cortex and motor
neuroimaging alterations in the brain and cervical cord were also shown to correlate with faster
disease progression and shorter survival, supporting a role of these measures as powerful prognostic
tools. Therefore, current evidence suggests that neuroimaging can be used to correctly diagnose and
stratify ALS patients into different stages and prognostic categories in a reliable way, particularly
when multimodal approaches are applied. These findings have obvious relevance for the clinical
7. Expert Commentary
The diagnosis of ALS is based on the demonstration of UMN and LMN degeneration. Whereas
neurophysiological assessment is commonly used to assist the clinician in the identification of LMN
t
ip
damage, currently no markers of occult or subtle UMN involvement have been translated to the
clinical practice. Moreover, clinical measures of functional impairment (e.g., the ALSFRS-R scale)
cr
are rater-dependent and may not be sensitive to subtle changes at short follow-up time intervals.
us
Another key issue in the evaluation of ALS is the great clinical heterogeneity of this condition, as
patients might present with a wide variety of clinical pictures ranging from prevalent UMN to
an
prevalent LMN involvement, and might show greatly variable rates of progression to severe
disability, tracheostomy or death. Genetic heterogeneity underlies and partially explains this clinical
M
diversity, and objective measures of neurodegeneration that can describe the signature pattern of
disease evolution in each ALS-related mutation are needed. Neuroimaging techniques have shown
ed
to provide reproducible, non-invasive measures of UMN damage in the brain (e.g., FA of the CST,
pt
cortical thickness of the primary motor cortex, etc.) that hold the promise to effectively allow an
early diagnosis and a reliable monitoring of disease evolution, and should be included in the clinical
ce
work-up of patients with ALS. Spinal cord imaging also indicated possible markers to be used for
the clinical management of ALS (such as measures of cord atrophy and diffusivity alterations in the
Ac
lateral columns), although findings from these studies warrant further validation due to technical
difficulties that have been overcome only recently. Moreover, MR and PET imaging are candidate
markers for the evaluation of extra-motor involvement in ALS, which is closely related to the
development of cognitive and behavioral alterations in this condition that overlaps with FTD. The
main limitations of current research in this field are the relatively small sample sizes – especially in
longitudinal studies – due to enrollment difficulties in a rare and rapidly progressive disease, the
scarcity of large multicenter studies, and the prevalent use of a single technique for each study.
Considering the complexity of ALS, the use of multimodal approaches and advanced statistical
models such as network-based analyses will be needed to elaborate highly accurate diagnostic and
prognostic markers in this condition. Moreover, an effort should be made to enroll sufficient sample
sizes in follow-up studies, as failure to detect significant longitudinal evolution in some studies
might essentially derive from this issue. Finally, a greater number of large multicenter trials will be
t
ip
required to definitely establish the applicability of any proposed neuroimaging marker to the
clinical practice.
cr
us
8. Five-year view
Available findings from neuroimaging research in ALS suggest that the use of quantitative
an
measures of CNS damage provided by MRI and PET is soon to be translated into the clinical
practice for diagnostic, prognostic and disease monitoring purposes. The inclusion of these
M
assessments into the design of pharmacological trials is likely to provide objective, reliable outcome
measures that may help identifying effective disease-modifying drugs for a fatal rapidly evolving
ed
disease such as ALS. Large-scale, longitudinal studies will also validate current views supporting
pt
the pathological spreading of TDP-43 inclusions from motor to extra-motor areas in a prion-like
9. Key issues
• Visual assessment of T2/FLAIR hyperintensity in the CST on brain and spinal cord MRI is
not recommended for making a firm diagnosis of ALS. Only recently, the application of
quantitative approaches and high magnetic fields has provided some benefit in those
• The most consistent neuroimaging diagnostic markers of ALS are cortical thinning of the
primary motor cortex, diffusivity alterations of the CST and motor callosal fibres, and
cervical cord atrophy. These measures showed high diagnostic accuracy and good
hypometabolism have been shown to involve not only the motor system, but also
t
ip
• fMRI, MRS and PET ligand studies showed complex functional and neurometabolic
alterations over the ALS disease course, supporting current views regarding a pathogenetic
cr
role of excitotoxicity and neuroinflammation in this disease.
us
• In this review, we provide an overview of the different neuroimaging techniques assessing
clinical practice.
M
ed
Funding
Declaration of interest
ce
F Agosta is Section Editor of NeuroImage: Clinical, has received speaker honoraria from Biogen
Idec, Novartis, and ExceMED – Excellence in Medical Education and receives or has received
Ac
research support from the Italian Ministry of Health, Fondazione Italiana di Ricerca per la SLA
(AriSLA), and the European Research Council. M Filippi is Editor-in-Chief for the Journal of
Neurology; serves on a scientific advisory board for Teva Pharmaceutical Industries; has received
compensation for consulting and/or speaking activities from Biogen Idec, Merck-Serono, Novartis,
Teva Pharmaceuticals; and receives research support from Biogen Idec, Teva Pharmaceuticals,
Novartis, Italian Ministry of Health, Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla, Cure PSP, Alzheimer’s
Drug Discovery Foundation, the Jacques and Gloria Gossweiler Foundation, and AriSLA. The
authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity
with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the
manuscript apart from those disclosed. Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial
t
ip
cr
us
an
M
ed
pt
ce
Ac
References
Papers of special note have been highlighted as:
* of interest
** of considerable interest
1. Swinnen B and Robberecht W, The phenotypic variability of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Nat Rev Neurol, 2014. 10(11): p. 661-70.
2. Neumann M, Sampathu DM, Kwong LK, et al., Ubiquitinated TDP-43 in frontotemporal
lobar degeneration and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Science, 2006. 314(5796): p. 130-3.
3. Brettschneider J, Del Tredici K, Toledo JB, et al., Stages of pTDP-43 pathology in
t
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann Neurol, 2013. 74(1): p. 20-38.
ip
** A groundbreaking neuropathological study assessing the regional pattern of TDP-43
deposition in ALS patients post-mortem, establishing progressive stages of disease
pathology
cr
4. Renton AE, Chio A, and Traynor BJ, State of play in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis genetics.
Nat Neurosci, 2014. 17(1): p. 17-23.
5. Katyal N and Govindarajan R, Shortcomings in the Current Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
us
Trials and Potential Solutions for Improvement. Front Neurol, 2017. 8: p. 521.
6. Filippi M, Agosta F, Abrahams S, et al., EFNS guidelines on the use of neuroimaging in the
management of motor neuron diseases. Eur J Neurol, 2010. 17(4): p. 526-e20.
7.
an
Fabes J, Matthews L, Filippini N, et al., Quantitative FLAIR MRI in Amyotrophic Lateral
Sclerosis. Acad Radiol, 2017. 24(10): p. 1187-1194.
8. Cohen-Adad J, Zhao W, Keil B, et al., 7-T MRI of the spinal cord can detect lateral
corticospinal tract abnormality in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Muscle Nerve, 2013. 47(5):
M
p. 760-2.
9. Agosta F, Pagani E, Rocca MA, et al., Voxel-based morphometry study of brain volumetry
and diffusivity in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients with mild disability. Hum Brain
Mapp, 2007. 28(12): p. 1430-8.
ed
10. Turner MR, Hammers A, Allsop J, et al., Volumetric cortical loss in sporadic and familial
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler, 2007. 8(6): p. 343-7.
11. Mezzapesa DM, Ceccarelli A, Dicuonzo F, et al., Whole-brain and regional brain atrophy in
pt
13. Shen D, Cui L, Fang J, et al., Voxel-Wise Meta-Analysis of Gray Matter Changes in
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Front Aging Neurosci, 2016. 8: p. 64.
14. Bede P, Bokde A, Elamin M, et al., Grey matter correlates of clinical variables in
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS): a neuroimaging study of ALS motor phenotype
Ac
heterogeneity and cortical focality. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2013. 84(7): p. 766-73.
15. Lillo P, Mioshi E, Burrell JR, et al., Grey and white matter changes across the amyotrophic
lateral sclerosis-frontotemporal dementia continuum. PLoS One, 2012. 7(8): p. e43993.
16. Masuda M, Senda J, Watanabe H, et al., Involvement of the caudate nucleus head and its
networks in sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-frontotemporal dementia continuum.
Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener, 2016. 17(7-8): p. 571-579.
17. Alruwaili AR, Pannek K, Coulthard A, et al., A combined tract-based spatial statistics and
voxel-based morphometry study of the first MRI scan after diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral
sclerosis with subgroup analysis. J Neuroradiol, 2017.
18. Menke RA, Korner S, Filippini N, et al., Widespread grey matter pathology dominates the
longitudinal cerebral MRI and clinical landscape of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain,
2014. 137(Pt 9): p. 2546-55.
** A large longitudinal MRI study comparing patterns of grey matter and white matter
damage over the disease course of ALS.
19. Verstraete E, van den Heuvel MP, Veldink JH, et al., Motor network degeneration in
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a structural and functional connectivity study. PLoS One,
2010. 5(10): p. e13664.
20. Agosta F, Valsasina P, Riva N, et al., The cortical signature of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
PLoS One, 2012. 7(8): p. e42816.
21. Schuster C, Kasper E, Dyrba M, et al., Cortical thinning and its relation to cognition in
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurobiol Aging, 2014. 35(1): p. 240-6.
22. Agosta F, Ferraro PM, Riva N, et al., Structural brain correlates of cognitive and behavioral
impairment in MND. Hum Brain Mapp, 2016. 37(4): p. 1614-26.
t
* A large study comparing structural alterations between ALS patients with and without
ip
cognitive impairment and their relationship with neuropsychological deficits.
23. Schuster C, Kasper E, Machts J, et al., Focal thinning of the motor cortex mirrors clinical
features of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and their phenotypes: a neuroimaging study. J
cr
Neurol, 2013. 260(11): p. 2856-64.
24. Kwan JY, Meoded A, Danielian LE, et al., Structural imaging differences and longitudinal
changes in primary lateral sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neuroimage Clin,
us
2012. 2: p. 151-60.
25. Walhout R, Westeneng HJ, Verstraete E, et al., Cortical thickness in ALS: towards a marker
for upper motor neuron involvement. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2015. 86(3): p. 288-
94.
an
26. Spinelli EG, Agosta F, Ferraro PM, et al., Brain MR Imaging in Patients with Lower Motor
Neuron-Predominant Disease. Radiology, 2016. 280(2): p. 545-56.
27. Verstraete E, Veldink JH, Hendrikse J, et al., Structural MRI reveals cortical thinning in
M
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2012. 83(4): p. 383-8.
28. Ferraro PM, Agosta F, Riva N, et al., Multimodal structural MRI in the diagnosis of motor
neuron diseases. Neuroimage Clin, 2017. 16: p. 240-247.
ed
* A multimodal structural MRI study supporting the use of automated, combined approaches
for the diagnosis of ALS, also using a disease control group.
29. Schuster C, Kasper E, Machts J, et al., Longitudinal course of cortical thickness decline in
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol, 2014. 261(10): p. 1871-80.
pt
30. Bede P, Elamin M, Byrne S, et al., Basal ganglia involvement in amyotrophic lateral
sclerosis. Neurology, 2013. 81(24): p. 2107-15.
31. Westeneng HJ, Verstraete E, Walhout R, et al., Subcortical structures in amyotrophic lateral
ce
tensor imaging study in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2016.
87(6): p. 570-9.
34. Trojsi F, Corbo D, Caiazzo G, et al., Motor and extramotor neurodegeneration in
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a 3T high angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI)
study. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener, 2013. 14(7-8): p. 553-61.
35. Agosta F, Galantucci S, Riva N, et al., Intrahemispheric and interhemispheric structural
network abnormalities in PLS and ALS. Hum Brain Mapp, 2014. 35(4): p. 1710-22.
36. Prudlo J, Bissbort C, Glass A, et al., White matter pathology in ALS and lower motor
neuron ALS variants: a diffusion tensor imaging study using tract-based spatial statistics. J
Neurol, 2012. 259(9): p. 1848-59.
37. Rosenbohm A, Muller HP, Hubers A, et al., Corticoefferent pathways in pure lower motor
neuron disease: a diffusion tensor imaging study. J Neurol, 2016. 263(12): p. 2430-2437.
38. Muller HP, Agosta F, Riva N, et al., Fast progressive lower motor neuron disease is an ALS
variant: A two-centre tract of interest-based MRI data analysis. Neuroimage Clin, 2018. 17:
p. 145-152.
39. Kassubek J, Muller HP, Del Tredici K, et al., Diffusion tensor imaging analysis of
sequential spreading of disease in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis confirms patterns of TDP-43
pathology. Brain, 2014. 137(Pt 6): p. 1733-40.
40. van der Graaff MM, Sage CA, Caan MW, et al., Upper and extra-motoneuron involvement
in early motoneuron disease: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Brain, 2011. 134(Pt 4): p.
1211-28.
41. Keil C, Prell T, Peschel T, et al., Longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging in amyotrophic
lateral sclerosis. BMC Neurosci, 2012. 13: p. 141.
t
42. Kassubek J, Muller HP, Del Tredici K, et al., Imaging the pathoanatomy of amyotrophic
ip
lateral sclerosis in vivo: targeting a propagation-based biological marker. J Neurol
Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2017.
** A novel tract-based approach to stage ALS patients in vivo using diffusion tensor MRI.
cr
43. Agosta F, Rocca MA, Valsasina P, et al., A longitudinal diffusion tensor MRI study of the
cervical cord and brain in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. J Neurol Neurosurg
Psychiatry, 2009. 80(1): p. 53-5.
us
44. Cardenas AM, Sarlls JE, Kwan JY, et al., Pathology of callosal damage in ALS: An ex-vivo,
7 T diffusion tensor MRI study. Neuroimage Clin, 2017. 15: p. 200-208.
45. Foerster BR, Carlos RC, Dwamena BA, et al., Multimodal MRI as a diagnostic biomarker
an
for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann Clin Transl Neurol, 2014. 1(2): p. 107-14.
46. Sivak S, Bittsansky M, Kurca E, et al., Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in patients
with early stages of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neuroradiology, 2010. 52(12): p. 1079-85.
47. Pyra T, Hui B, Hanstock C, et al., Combined structural and neurochemical evaluation of the
M
corticospinal tract in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler, 2010. 11(1-2):
p. 157-65.
48. Verma G, Woo JH, Chawla S, et al., Whole-brain analysis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
by using echo-planar spectroscopic imaging. Radiology, 2013. 267(3): p. 851-7.
ed
49. Usman U, Choi C, Camicioli R, et al., Mesial prefrontal cortex degeneration in amyotrophic
lateral sclerosis: a high-field proton MR spectroscopy study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2011.
32(9): p. 1677-80.
pt
50. Unrath A, Ludolph AC, and Kassubek J, Brain metabolites in definite amyotrophic lateral
sclerosis. A longitudinal proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. J Neurol, 2007.
254(8): p. 1099-106.
ce
51. Rule RR, Suhy J, Schuff N, et al., Reduced NAA in motor and non-motor brain regions in
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Amyotroph Lateral
Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord, 2004. 5(3): p. 141-9.
52. Kalra S, Hanstock CC, Martin WR, et al., Detection of cerebral degeneration in amyotrophic
Ac
lateral sclerosis using high-field magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Arch Neurol, 2006.
63(8): p. 1144-8.
53. Pioro EP, Majors AW, Mitsumoto H, et al., 1H-MRS evidence of neurodegeneration and
excess glutamate + glutamine in ALS medulla. Neurology, 1999. 53(1): p. 71-9.
54. Han J and Ma L, Study of the features of proton MR spectroscopy ((1)H-MRS) on
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2010. 31(2): p. 305-8.
55. Bowen BC, Pattany PM, Bradley WG, et al., MR imaging and localized proton spectroscopy
of the precentral gyrus in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2000.
21(4): p. 647-58.
56. Atassi N, Xu M, Triantafyllou C, et al., Ultra high-field (7tesla) magnetic resonance
spectroscopy in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. PLoS One, 2017. 12(5): p. e0177680.
57. Mohammadi B, Kollewe K, Samii A, et al., Changes of resting state brain networks in
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Exp Neurol, 2009. 217(1): p. 147-53.
58. Fekete T, Zach N, Mujica-Parodi LR, et al., Multiple kernel learning captures a systems-
level functional connectivity biomarker signature in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. PLoS
One, 2013. 8(12): p. e85190.
59. Trojsi F, Esposito F, de Stefano M, et al., Functional overlap and divergence between ALS
and bvFTD. Neurobiol Aging, 2015. 36(1): p. 413-23.
60. Douaud G, Filippini N, Knight S, et al., Integration of structural and functional magnetic
resonance imaging in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain, 2011. 134(Pt 12): p. 3470-9.
61. Agosta F, Canu E, Inuggi A, et al., Resting state functional connectivity alterations in
primary lateral sclerosis. Neurobiol Aging, 2014. 35(4): p. 916-25.
t
62. Zhou F, Xu R, Dowd E, et al., Alterations in regional functional coherence within the
ip
sensory-motor network in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurosci Lett, 2014. 558: p. 192-6.
63. Agosta F, Canu E, Valsasina P, et al., Divergent brain network connectivity in amyotrophic
lateral sclerosis. Neurobiol Aging, 2013. 34(2): p. 419-27.
cr
64. Luo C, Chen Q, Huang R, et al., Patterns of spontaneous brain activity in amyotrophic
lateral sclerosis: a resting-state FMRI study. PLoS One, 2012. 7(9): p. e45470.
65. Agosta F, Valsasina P, Absinta M, et al., Sensorimotor functional connectivity changes in
us
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Cereb Cortex, 2011. 21(10): p. 2291-8.
66. Menke RAL, Proudfoot M, Talbot K, et al., The two-year progression of structural and
functional cerebral MRI in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neuroimage Clin, 2018. 17: p.
an
953-961.
67. Foerster BR, Callaghan BC, Petrou M, et al., Decreased motor cortex gamma-aminobutyric
acid in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology, 2012. 78(20): p. 1596-600.
68. Lloyd CM, Richardson MP, Brooks DJ, et al., Extramotor involvement in ALS: PET studies
M
with the GABA(A) ligand [(11)C]flumazenil. Brain, 2000. 123 ( Pt 11): p. 2289-96.
69. Kew JJ, Goldstein LH, Leigh PN, et al., The relationship between abnormalities of cognitive
function and cerebral activation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. A neuropsychological and
ed
t
81. Valsasina P, Agosta F, Benedetti B, et al., Diffusion anisotropy of the cervical cord is
ip
strictly associated with disability in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg
Psychiatry, 2007. 78(5): p. 480-4.
82. Nair G, Carew JD, Usher S, et al., Diffusion tensor imaging reveals regional differences in
cr
the cervical spinal cord in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neuroimage, 2010. 53(2): p. 576-
83.
83. Ikeda K, Murata K, Kawase Y, et al., Relationship between cervical cord 1H-magnetic
us
resonance spectroscopy and clinoco-electromyographic profile in amyotrophic lateral
sclerosis. Muscle Nerve, 2013. 47(1): p. 61-7.
84. Carew JD, Nair G, Pineda-Alonso N, et al., Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the cervical
an
cord in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler, 2011. 12(3): p. 185-91.
85. Agosta F, Sala S, Valsasina P, et al., Brain network connectivity assessed using graph theory
in frontotemporal dementia. Neurology, 2013. 81(2): p. 134-43.
86. Verstraete E, Veldink JH, Mandl RC, et al., Impaired structural motor connectome in
M
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. PLoS One, 2011. 6(9): p. e24239.
87. Buchanan CR, Pettit LD, Storkey AJ, et al., Reduced structural connectivity within a
prefrontal-motor-subcortical network in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Magn Reson
Imaging, 2015. 41(5): p. 1342-52.
ed
88. Verstraete E, Veldink JH, van den Berg LH, et al., Structural brain network imaging shows
expanding disconnection of the motor system in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Hum Brain
Mapp, 2014. 35(4): p. 1351-61.
pt
89. Schmidt R, de Reus MA, Scholtens LH, et al., Simulating disease propagation across white
matter connectome reveals anatomical substrate for neuropathology staging in amyotrophic
lateral sclerosis. Neuroimage, 2016. 124(Pt A): p. 762-769.
90. Zhou C, Hu X, Hu J, et al., Altered Brain Network in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A
Ac
Resting Graph Theory-Based Network Study at Voxel-Wise Level. Front Neurosci, 2016.
10: p. 204.
91. Geevasinga N, Korgaonkar MS, Menon P, et al., Brain functional connectome abnormalities
in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis are associated with disability and cortical hyperexcitability.
Eur J Neurol, 2017. 24(12): p. 1507-1517.
92. Oxtoby NP, Alexander DC, and Euro Pc, Imaging plus X: multimodal models of
neurodegenerative disease. Curr Opin Neurol, 2017. 30(4): p. 371-379.
93. Schuster C, Hardiman O, and Bede P, Development of an Automated MRI-Based
Diagnostic Protocol for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Using Disease-Specific
Pathognomonic Features: A Quantitative Disease-State Classification Study. PLoS One,
2016. 11(12): p. e0167331.
94. Bede P, Iyer PM, Finegan E, et al., Virtual brain biopsies in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis:
Diagnostic classification based on in vivo pathological patterns. Neuroimage Clin, 2017. 15:
p. 653-658.
95. Schuster C, Hardiman O, and Bede P, Survival prediction in Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
based on MRI measures and clinical characteristics. BMC Neurol, 2017. 17(1): p. 73.
96. Querin G, El Mendili MM, Lenglet T, et al., Spinal cord multi-parametric magnetic
resonance imaging for survival prediction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Eur J Neurol,
2017. 24(8): p. 1040-1046.
97. Rohrer JD, Isaacs AM, Mizielinska S, et al., C9orf72 expansions in frontotemporal dementia
and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lancet Neurol, 2015. 14(3): p. 291-301.
98. Bede P, Bokde AL, Byrne S, et al., Multiparametric MRI study of ALS stratified for the
t
C9orf72 genotype. Neurology, 2013. 81(4): p. 361-9.
ip
99. Agosta F, Ferraro PM, Riva N, et al., Structural and functional brain signatures of C9orf72
in motor neuron disease. Neurobiol Aging, 2017. 57: p. 206-219.
100. Floeter MK, Danielian LE, Braun LE, et al., Longitudinal diffusion imaging across the
cr
C9orf72 clinical spectrum. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2018. 89(1): p. 53-60.
101. Blain CR, Brunton S, Williams VC, et al., Differential corticospinal tract degeneration in
homozygous 'D90A' SOD-1 ALS and sporadic ALS. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2011.
us
82(8): p. 843-9.
102. Stanton BR, Shinhmar D, Turner MR, et al., Diffusion tensor imaging in sporadic and
familial (D90A SOD1) forms of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Arch Neurol, 2009. 66(1): p.
an
109-15.
103. Agosta F, Spinelli EG, Marjanovic IV, et al., Unraveling ALS due to SOD1 mutation
through the combination of brain and cervical cord MRI. Neurology, 2018.
M
ed
pt
ce
Ac
Figure legends
Figure 1. (A) Axial view of 7-T T*2-weighted images in a control subject and in a patient with
ALS. Slices are centered at the C2 (top row) and C4 (bottom row) vertebral levels. Hyperintensity is
clearly visible in both lateral segments of the spinal cord in the ALS patient, corresponding to the
corticospinal tract (CST) (arrows). Orientation: V = ventral, R = right. (B) Quantification of the
t
ip
T*2-weighted signal in both lateral segments of the spinal cord, between C2 and mid-C5. Signal in
the CST was normalized by the average signal in the dorsal segment of the cord (see regions of
cr
interest definition in right panel). The t-test compares normalized signal in the CST between control
us
and patient. *P < 10-7 (corrected). Reproduced with permission from [8].
an
Figure 2. Focal atrophy of the motor homunculus, when comparing patients with bulbar onset ALS
and those with limb onset. The blue colour indicates focal atrophy in patients with bulbar onset
M
compared with those with limb onset, while the orange colour indicates focal atrophy in patients
with limb onset compared with those with bulbar onset (p < 0.05 family-wise error). The relevant
ed
clusters are overlaid onto the study-specific averaged grey matter map. Reproduced with permission
pt
from [14].
ce
Figure 3. Axial and coronal T1-weighted images of the Montreal Neurologic Institute standard
brain show white matter (WM) tract damage in patients with classic ALS compared with healthy
Ac
control subjects. Voxel-wise group differences in fractional anisotropy (red), mean diffusivity
(blue), and radial diffusivity (purple) are shown. Results were overlaid on WM skeleton images
(light green; p < 0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons). L = left. R = right. Reproduced with
thalamic and visual resting state networks (RSN, shown thresholded at z > 3 in red-yellow in the
left panel, shown in green otherwise) over time and in relation to ALS functional rating scale
(ALSFRS-R) decline. Clusters of significant change (encircled in red for improved visibility) are
overlaid onto the respective RSN (green), as well as the mean filtered functional image in Montreal
Neurologic Institute space in the middle and right panel. Blue-lightblue – results without voxel-
t
ip
based morphometry (VBM) regressor. Pink – results with VBM regressor. Reproduced from [66]
cr
us
Figure 5. Diagnostic ability of MRI models. Figure shows the ability of the combined MRI model
(i.e., cortical thickness + DT MRI) and the DT MRI measures in differentiating ALS and PUMN
an
patients from healthy controls and ALS-mimic disorders, respectively. Scaling coordinates of the
proximity matrix from random forest were used to represent the distance – in terms of MRI values –
M