Metaphor - Wikipedia
Metaphor - Wikipedia
Metaphor - Wikipedia
Metaphor
A metaphor is a figure of speech that, for rhetorical effect,
directly refers to one thing by mentioning another.[1] It may
provide (or obscure) clarity or identify hidden similarities
between two ideas. Metaphors are often compared with other
types of figurative language, such as antithesis, hyperbole,
metonymy and simile.[2] One of the most commonly cited
examples of a metaphor in English literature comes from the "All
the world's a stage" monologue from As You Like It:
Contents
Etymology
Parts of a metaphor
As a type of comparison
Metaphor vs metonymy
Subtypes
In rhetoric and literature
As style in speech and writing
Larger applications
Conceptual metaphors
As a foundation of our conceptual system
Nonlinguistic metaphors
In historical linguistics
Historical theories
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphor#Types,_terms_and_categories 1/11
11/10/2020 Metaphor - Wikipedia
See also
References
Bibliography
External links
Etymology
The English metaphor derived from the 16th-century Old French word métaphore, which comes from
the Latin metaphora, "carrying over", in turn from the Greek µεταφορά (metaphorá), "transfer",[6]
from µεταφέρω (metapherō), "to carry over", "to transfer"[7] and that from µετά (meta), "after, with,
across"[8] + φέρω (pherō), "to bear", "to carry".[9]
Parts of a metaphor
The Philosophy of Rhetoric (1937) by rhetorician I. A. Richards describes a metaphor as having two
parts: the tenor and the vehicle. The tenor is the subject to which attributes are ascribed. The vehicle
is the object whose attributes are borrowed. In the previous example, "the world" is compared to a
stage, describing it with the attributes of "the stage"; "the world" is the tenor, and "a stage" is the
vehicle; "men and women" is the secondary tenor, and "players" is the secondary vehicle.
Other writers employ the general terms 'ground' and 'figure' to denote the tenor and the vehicle.
Cognitive linguistics uses the terms 'target' and 'source', respectively.
Psychologist Julian Jaynes coined the terms 'metaphrand' and 'metaphier', plus two new concepts,
'paraphrand' and 'paraphier'.[10] [11] 'Metaphrand' is equivalent to the metaphor-theory terms 'tenor',
'target', and 'ground'. 'Metaphier' is equivalent to the metaphor-theory terms 'vehicle', 'figure', and
'source'. In a simple metaphor, an obvious attribute of the metaphier exactly characterizes the
metaphrand (e.g. the ship plowed the seas). With an inexact metaphor, however, a metaphier might
have associated attributes or nuances – its paraphiers – that enrich the metaphor because they
"project back" to the metaphrand, potentially creating new ideas – the paraphrands – associated
thereafter with the metaphrand or even leading to a new metaphor. For example, in the metaphor
"Pat is a tornado", the metaphrand is "Pat", the metaphier is "tornado". As metaphier, "tornado"
carries paraphiers such as power, storm and wind, counterclockwise motion, and danger, threat,
destruction, etc. The metaphoric meaning of "tornado" is inexact: one might understand that 'Pat is
powerfully destructive' through the paraphrand of physical and emotional destruction; another
person might understand the metaphor as 'Pat can spin out of control'. In the latter case, the
paraphier of 'spinning motion' has become the paraphrand 'psychological spin', suggesting an entirely
new metaphor for emotional unpredictability, a possibly apt description for a human being hardly
applicable to a tornado. Based on his analysis, Jaynes claims that metaphors not only enhance
description, but "increase enormously our powers of perception...and our understanding of [the
world], and literally create new objects".[10]:50
As a type of comparison
Metaphors are most frequently compared with similes. It is said, for instance, that a metaphor is 'a
condensed analogy' or 'analogical fusion' or that they 'operate in a similar fashion' or are 'based on the
same mental process' or yet that 'the basic processes of analogy are at work in metaphor'. It is also
pointed out that 'a border between metaphor and analogy is fuzzy' and 'the difference between them
might be described (metaphorically) as the distance between things being compared'. A metaphor
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphor#Types,_terms_and_categories 2/11
11/10/2020 Metaphor - Wikipedia
asserts the objects in the comparison are identical on the point of comparison, while a simile merely
asserts a similarity through use of words such as "like" or "as". For this reason a common-type
metaphor is generally considered more forceful than a simile.[12][13]
Allegory: An extended metaphor wherein a story illustrates an important attribute of the subject.
Antithesis: A rhetorical contrast of ideas by means of parallel arrangements of words, clauses, or
sentences.[14]
Catachresis: A mixed metaphor, sometimes used by design and sometimes by accident (a
rhetorical fault).
Hyperbole: Excessive exaggeration to illustrate a point.[15]
Parable: An extended metaphor told as an anecdote to illustrate or teach a moral or spiritual
lesson, such as in Aesop's fables or Jesus' teaching method as told in the Bible.
Pun: A verbal device by which multiple definitions of a word or its homophones are used to give a
sentence multiple valid readings, typically to humorous effect.
Similitude: An extended simile or metaphor that has a picture part (Bildhälfte), a reality part
(Sachhälfte), and a point of comparison (teritium comparationis).[16] Similitudes are found in the
parables of Jesus.
Metaphor vs metonymy
Metaphor is distinct from metonymy, both constituting two fundamental modes of thought. Metaphor
works by bringing together concepts from different conceptual domains, whereas metonymy uses one
element from a given domain to refer to another closely related element. A metaphor creates new
links between otherwise distinct conceptual domains, whereas a metonymy relies on pre-existent
links within them.
For example, in the phrase "lands belonging to the crown", the word "crown" is a metonymy because
some monarchs do indeed wear a crown, physically. In other words, there is a pre-existent link
between "crown" and "monarchy".[17] On the other hand, when Ghil'ad Zuckermann argues that the
Israeli language is a "phoenicuckoo cross with some magpie characteristics", he is using a
metaphor.[18]:4 There is no physical link between a language and a bird. The reason the metaphors
"phoenix" and "cuckoo" are used is that on the one hand hybridic "Israeli" is based on Hebrew, which,
like a phoenix, rises from the ashes; and on the other hand, hybridic "Israeli" is based on Yiddish,
which like a cuckoo, lays its egg in the nest of another bird, tricking it to believe that it is its own egg.
Furthermore, the metaphor "magpie" is employed because, according to Zuckermann, hybridic
"Israeli" displays the characteristics of a magpie, "stealing" from languages such as Arabic and
English.[18]:4–6
Subtypes
A dead metaphor is a metaphor in which the sense of a transferred image has become absent. The
phrases "to grasp a concept" and "to gather what you've understood" use physical action as a
metaphor for understanding. The audience does not need to visualize the action; dead metaphors
normally go unnoticed. Some distinguish between a dead metaphor and a cliché. Others use "dead
metaphor" to denote both.[19]
A mixed metaphor is a metaphor that leaps from one identification to a second inconsistent with the
first, e.g.:
I smell a rat [...] but I'll nip him in the bud" — Irish politician Boyle Roche
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphor#Types,_terms_and_categories 3/11
11/10/2020 Metaphor - Wikipedia
If we can hit that bull's-eye then the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards...
Checkmate.
An extended metaphor, or conceit, sets up a principal subject with several subsidiary subjects or
comparisons. In the above quote from As You Like It, the world is first described as a stage and then
the subsidiary subjects men and women are further described in the same context.
An implicit metaphor has no specified tenor, although the vehicle is present. M. H. Abrams offers the
following as an example of an implicit metaphor: "That reed was too frail to survive the storm of its
sorrows". The reed is the vehicle for the implicit tenor, someone's death, and the "storm" is the vehicle
for the person's "sorrows".[21]
Metaphor can serve as a device for persuading an audience of the user's argument or thesis, the so-
called rhetorical metaphor.
Educational psychologist Andrew Ortony gives more explicit detail: "Metaphors are necessary as a
communicative device because they allow the transfer of coherent chunks of characteristics --
perceptual, cognitive, emotional and experiential -- from a vehicle which is known to a topic which is
less so. In so doing they circumvent the problem of specifying one by one each of the often
unnameable and innumerable characteristics; they avoid discretizing the perceived continuity of
experience and are thus closer to experience and consequently more vivid and memorable."[25]
As a characteristic of speech and writing, metaphors can serve the poetic imagination. This allows
Sylvia Plath, in her poem "Cut", to compare the blood issuing from her cut thumb to the running of a
million soldiers, "redcoats, every one"; and enabling Robert Frost, in "The Road Not Taken", to
compare a life to a journey.[26][27][28]
Larger applications
Sonja K. Foss characterizes metaphors as "nonliteral comparisons in which a word or phrase from one
domain of experience is applied to another domain".[29] She argues that since reality is mediated by
the language we use to describe it, the metaphors we use shape the world and our interactions to it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphor#Types,_terms_and_categories 4/11
11/10/2020 Metaphor - Wikipedia
Conceptual metaphors
Some theorists have suggested that metaphors are not merely stylistic, but that they are cognitively
important as well. In Metaphors We Live By, George Lakoff and Mark Johnson argue that metaphors
are pervasive in everyday life, not just in language, but also in thought and action. A common
definition of metaphor can be described as a comparison that shows how two things that are not alike
in most ways are similar in another important way. They explain how a metaphor is simply
understanding and experiencing one kind of thing in terms of another, called a "conduit metaphor". A
speaker can put ideas or objects into containers, and then send them along a conduit to a listener who
removes the object from the container to make meaning of it. Thus, communication is something that
ideas go into, and the container is separate from the ideas themselves. Lakoff and Johnson give
several examples of daily metaphors in use, including "argument is war" and "time is money".
Metaphors are widely used in context to describe personal meaning. The authors suggest that
communication can be viewed as a machine: "Communication is not what one does with the machine,
but is the machine itself."[30]
Experimental evidence shows that "priming" people with material from one area will influence how
they perform tasks and interpret language in a metaphorically related area.[a]
Cognitive linguists emphasize that metaphors serve to facilitate the understanding of one conceptual
domain—typically an abstraction such as "life", "theories" or "ideas"—through expressions that relate
to another, more familiar conceptual domain—typically more concrete, such as "journey", "buildings"
or "food".[32][33] For example: we devour a book of raw facts, try to digest them, stew over them, let
them simmer on the back-burner, regurgitate them in discussions, and cook up explanations, hoping
they do not seem half-baked.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphor#Types,_terms_and_categories 5/11
11/10/2020 Metaphor - Wikipedia
Lakoff and Johnson greatly contributed to establishing the importance of conceptual metaphor as a
framework for thinking in language, leading scholars to investigate the original ways in which writers
used novel metaphors and question the fundamental frameworks of thinking in conceptual
metaphors.
From a sociological, cultural, or philosophical perspective, one asks to what extent ideologies
maintain and impose conceptual patterns of thought by introducing, supporting, and adapting
fundamental patterns of thinking metaphorically.[34] To what extent does the ideology fashion and
refashion the idea of the nation as a container with borders? How are enemies and outsiders
represented? As diseases? As attackers? How are the metaphoric paths of fate, destiny, history, and
progress represented? As the opening of an eternal monumental moment (German fascism)? Or as
the path to communism (in Russian or Czech for example)?
Some cognitive scholars have attempted to take on board the idea that different languages have
evolved radically different concepts and conceptual metaphors, while others hold to the Sapir-Whorf
hypothesis. German philologist Wilhelm von Humboldt contributed significantly to this debate on the
relationship between culture, language, and linguistic communities. Humboldt remains, however,
relatively unknown in English-speaking nations. Andrew Goatly, in "Washing the Brain", takes on
board the dual problem of conceptual metaphor as a framework implicit in the language as a system
and the way individuals and ideologies negotiate conceptual metaphors. Neural biological research
suggests some metaphors are innate, as demonstrated by reduced metaphorical understanding in
psychopathy.[35]
James W. Underhill, in Creating Worldviews: Ideology, Metaphor & Language (Edinburgh UP),
considers the way individual speech adopts and reinforces certain metaphoric paradigms. This
involves a critique of both communist and fascist discourse. Underhill's studies are situated in Czech
and German, which allows him to demonstrate the ways individuals are thinking both within and
resisting the modes by which ideologies seek to appropriate key concepts such as "the people", "the
state", "history", and "struggle".
Though metaphors can be considered to be "in" language, Underhill's chapter on French, English and
ethnolinguistics demonstrates that we cannot conceive of language or languages in anything other
than metaphoric terms.
Nonlinguistic metaphors
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphor#Types,_terms_and_categories 6/11
11/10/2020 Metaphor - Wikipedia
In historical linguistics
In historical onomasiology or in historical linguistics, a metaphor is defined as a semantic change
based on a similarity in form or function between the original concept and the target concept named
by a word.[42]
For example, mouse: small, gray rodent with a long tail → small, gray computer device with a long
cord.
Historical theories
Friedrich Nietzsche makes metaphor the conceptual center of his early theory of society in On Truth
and Lies in the Non-Moral Sense.[44] Some sociologists have found his essay useful for thinking about
metaphors used in society and for reflecting on their own use of metaphor. Sociologists of religion
note the importance of metaphor in religious worldviews, and that it is impossible to think
sociologically about religion without metaphor.[45]
See also
Alliteration Origin of language
Camel's nose Origin of speech
Colemanballs Pataphor
Conceptual blending Personification
Description Reification (fallacy)
Hypocatastasis Sarcasm
Ideasthesia Simile
List of English-language metaphors Analogy
Literal and figurative language Tertium comparationis
Metaphor in philosophy War as metaphor
Misnomer World Hypotheses
References
1. Compare: "Definition of METAPHOR" (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/metaphor).
www.merriam-webster.com. Retrieved 29 March 2016. "[...] a figure of speech in which a word or
phrase literally denoting one kind of object or idea is used in place of another to suggest a
likeness or analogy between them [... .]"
2. The Oxford Companion to The English Language, 2nd Edition (e-book). Oxford University Press.
2018. ISBN 978-0-19-107387-8.
3. "As You Like It: Entire Play" (http://shakespeare.mit.edu/asyoulikeit/full.html).
Shakespeare.mit.edu. Retrieved 4 March 2012.
4. [1] (https://blog.oup.com/2019/09/last-shot-american-idioms/)
5. "Radio 4 – Reith Lectures 2003 – The Emerging Mind" (http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/reith2003/lect
ure4.shtml). BBC. Retrieved 4 March 2012.
6. μεταφορά (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.04.0057%
3Aentry%3D%2367015), Henry George Liddell, Robert Scott, A Greek-English Lexicon, on
Perseus
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphor#Types,_terms_and_categories 7/11
11/10/2020 Metaphor - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphor#Types,_terms_and_categories 8/11
11/10/2020 Metaphor - Wikipedia
31. Sato, Manami; Schafer, Amy J.; Bergen, Benjamin K. "Metaphor priming in sentence production:
Concrete pictures affect abstract language production" (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.09.0
10). Acta Psychologica. 156: 136–142. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.09.010 (https://doi.org/10.101
6%2Fj.actpsy.2014.09.010). ISSN 0001-6918 (https://www.worldcat.org/issn/0001-6918).
32. Lakoff G.; Johnson M. (2003) [1980]. Metaphors We Live By (https://archive.org/details/metaphors
weliveb00lako). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-46801-3.
33. Zoltán Kövecses. (2002) Metaphor: a practical introduction. Oxford University Press US.
ISBN 978-0-19-514511-3.
34. McKinnon, AM. (2013). 'Ideology and the Market Metaphor in Rational Choice Theory of Religion:
A Rhetorical Critique of "Religious Economies"'. Critical Sociology, vol 39, no. 4, pp. 529-543.[3]
(http://aura.abdn.ac.uk/bitstream/2164/3714/1/rational_choice_critique_author_final_version.pdf)
35. Meier, Brian P.; et al. (September 2007). "Failing to take the moral high ground: Psychopathy and
the vertical representation of morality" (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222054362).
Personality and Individual Differences. 43 (4): 757–767. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.001 (https://do
i.org/10.1016%2Fj.paid.2007.02.001). Retrieved 1 November 2016.
36. Meyer, L. (1956) Emotion and Meaning in Music. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
37. Blechner, M. (2018) The Mindbrain and Dreams: An Exploration of Dreaming, Thinking, and
Artistic Creation. NY: Routledge
38. Blechner, M. (1988) Differentiating empathy from therapeutic action. Contemporary
Psychoanalysis, 24:301–310.
39. Vischer, R. (1873) Über das optische Formgefühl: Ein Beitrag zur Aesthetik. Leipzig: Hermann
Credner. For an English translation of selections, see Wind, E. (1963) Art and Anarchy. London:
Faber and Faber.
40. Johnson, M. & Larson, S. (2003) "Something in the way she moves" – Metaphors of musical
motion. Metaphor and Symbol, 18:63–84
41. Whittock, T. (1992) The role of metaphor in dance. British Journal of Aesthetics, 32:242–249.
42. Cf. Joachim Grzega (2004), Bezeichnungswandel: Wie, Warum, Wozu? Ein Beitrag zur
englischen und allgemeinen Onomasiologie, Heidelberg: Winter, and Blank, Andreas (1997),
Prinzipien des lexikalischen Bedeutungswandels am Beispiel der romanischen Sprachen,
Tübingen: Niemeyer.
43. "Radio 4 – Reith Lectures 2003 – The Emerging Mind" (http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/reith2003/lect
ure4.shtml). BBC. Retrieved 4 March 2012.
44. "T he Nietzsche Channel: On Truth and Lie in an Extra-Moral Sense" (http://oregonstate.edu/instr
uct/phl201/modules/Philosophers/Nietzsche/Truth_and_Lie_in_an_Extra-Moral_Sense.htm).
oregonstate.edu.
45. McKinnon, A. M. (2012). "Metaphors in and for the Sociology of Religion: Towards a Theory after
Nietzsche" (http://aura.abdn.ac.uk/bitstream/2164/3056/1/Nietzsche_religion_metaphor_for_repos
itory.pdf) (PDF). Journal of Contemporary Religion. pp. 203–216.
Bibliography
This article incorporates material from the Citizendium article "Metaphor", which is licensed under
the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License but not under the GFDL.
Stefano Arduini (2007). (ed.) Metaphors, Roma, Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.
Aristotle. Poetics. Trans. I. Bywater. In The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford
Translation. (1984). 2 Vols. Ed. Jonathan Barnes. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Max Black (1954). Metaphor, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 55, pp. 273–294.
Max Black (1962). Models and metaphors: Studies in language and philosophy, Ithaca: Cornell
University Press.
Max Black (1979). More about Metaphor, in A. Ortony (ed) Metaphor & Thought.
Clive Cazeaux (2007). Metaphor and Continental Philosophy: From Kant to Derrida. New York:
Routledge.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphor#Types,_terms_and_categories 9/11
11/10/2020 Metaphor - Wikipedia
L. J. Cohen (1979). The Semantics of Metaphor, in A. Ortony (ed), Metaphor & Thought
Donald Davidson. (1978). "What Metaphors Mean." Reprinted in Inquiries into Truth and
Interpretation. (1984), Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Jacques Derrida (1982). "White Mythology: Metaphor in the Text of Philosophy." In Margins of
Philosophy. Trans. Alan Bass. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
René Dirvens; Ralf Pörings, eds. (2002). Metaphor and Metonymy in Contrast. Berlin.: Mouton de
Gruyter.
Fass, Dan (1988). "Metonymy and metaphor: what's the difference?". Proceedings of the 12th
conference on Computational linguistics. 1. pp. 177–81. doi:10.3115/991635.991671 (https://doi.o
rg/10.3115%2F991635.991671). ISBN 978-963-8431-56-1.
Jakobson, Roman (1990). "Two Aspects of Language and Two Types of Aphasic Disturbances".
In Linda Waugh; Monique Monville-Burston (eds.). On Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press. pp. 115–133. ISBN 978-0-674-63536-4.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. Metaphors We Live By (IL: University of Chicago Press, 1980), Chapters
1–3. (pp. 3–13).
Lakoff, George (1980). Metaphors We Live By (https://archive.org/details/metaphorsweliveb00lak
o). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-46801-3..
Low, Graham (11 February 1999). "An Essay is a Person". In Cameron, Lynne; Low, Graham
(eds.). Researching and Applying Metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 221–
48. ISBN 978-0-521-64964-3.
Peters, Wim (2003). "Metonymy as a cross-lingual phenomenon". Proceedings of the ACL 2003
workshop on Lexicon and figurative language. 14. pp. 1–9. doi:10.3115/1118975.1118976 (https://
doi.org/10.3115%2F1118975.1118976).
McKinnon, AM. (2012). 'Metaphors in and for the Sociology of Religion: Towards a Theory after
Nietzsche'. Journal of Contemporary Religion, vol 27, no. 2, pp. 203–216. [4] (http://aura.abdn.ac.
uk/bitstream/2164/3056/1/Nietzsche_religion_metaphor_for_repository.pdf)
David Punter (2007). Metaphor, London, Routledge.
Paul Ricoeur (1975). The Rule of Metaphor: Multi-Disciplinary Studies in the Creation of Meaning
in Language, trans. Robert Czerny with Kathleen McLaughlin and John Costello, S. J., London:
Routledge and Kegan Paul 1978. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press 1977)
I. A. Richards. (1936). The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
John Searle (1979). "Metaphor," in A. Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University
Press.
Underhill, James W., Creating Worldviews: Metaphor, Ideology & Language, Edinburgh UP, 2011.
Herscberger, Ruth (Summer 1943). "The Structure of Metaphor". The Kenyan Review. 5 (3): 433–
443. JSTOR 4332426 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/4332426).
Rudmin, Floyd W. (1991). "Having: A Brief History of Metaphor and Meaning" (http://heinonline.or
g/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/syrlr42&id=175&type=text&collection=journals). Syracuse Law
Review. 42: 163. Retrieved 11 October 2013.
Somov, Georgij Yu (2013). "The interrelation of metaphors and metonymies in sign systems of
visual art: An example analysis of works by V. I. Surikov" (https://zenodo.org/record/1040441).
Semiotica. 2013 (193): 31–66. doi:10.1515/sem-2013-0003 (https://doi.org/10.1515%2Fsem-2013
-0003).
External links
History of metaphor (https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00w227c) on In Our Time at the BBC
A short history of metaphor (https://web.archive.org/web/20070101145805/http://tscp.open.ac.uk/t
185/html/resources/r2history.htm)
Audio illustrations of metaphor as figure of speech (http://www.americanrhetoric.com/figures/meta
phor.htm)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphor#Types,_terms_and_categories 10/11
11/10/2020 Metaphor - Wikipedia
Cite error: There are <ref group=lower-alpha> tags or {{efn}} templates on this
page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=lower-alpha}}
template or {{notelist}} template (see the help page).
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this
site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia
Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphor#Types,_terms_and_categories 11/11