SM E-5 One Up Market Research - AK

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

One Up new product research

One up is a home-grown brand in the malted milk-


food category that is dominated by multinational
brands.
One up has 8.7% market share in 2 lakh tons category
(Rs.7000 crore annual turnover)
One up is available in regular/natural flavor and
chocolate flavor and the sales was split equally across
the 2 variants
Horlicks, Bournvita, Boost, Complan and Milo
dominated the category. The market had reached maturity and sales growth was difficult to
earn. Creating product innovation was a huge challenge.
Children (5 years to 14 years) accounted for 65% of total consumption. Senior citizens
accounted for 20% of the total consumption.
Youth and Adults accounted for the balance 15%.Dominant flavors were natural and
chocolate

Meenakshi the brand Manager at One Up, developed a new taste/flavor variant to target
the adult market---
a) She wanted to conduct a full-scale unbiased product test.
Recommend a research design that covers research method and question areas, location,
period, sample size, sample profile, recruitment of respondents etc. Explain the rationale
for the design and its limitations
b) Meenakshi wanted to know about adult perception and preference about
 Milk additives
 Preference about consuming as is versus with milk additives
 Preferred time of consumption
 Awareness about daily nutritional requirement and what is served by milk and
incremental nutritional gain from additives
 Was there a negative perception about coffee or tea?
 How did house holds make tea and coffee?
 Is there an opportunity for coffee or tea flavored malted milk food?
Recommend a research design that covers type of study, location, period, sample
size, sample profile, recruitment of respondents etc. Explain the rationale for the
design and its limitations
c) Meenakshi was wondering whether she can do a market study to be able to project
the sales of the product before launch?

Case Prepared by Prof. Surya Mahadevan for class discussion


a) Answer Key to part a)
 Research Objective: (What to test)
i. Product test--- covering taste, flavor, texture, thickness,
balance of taste, satiety, after taste etc. Water required in
preparation. Preparation time
ii. Assess what is desired quantity in one serving
iii. Test multiple variants with multiple panels

 Research Design:
i. Panel 1: Blind product taste test in a common location
where the product is prepared and served
ii. Panel 2: Blind product taste test for customer to prepare in
his house and taste.
iii. Comparative Panel 3: New product taste test Vs
benchmarked current brand Vs Ideal product
 Where to test:
i. Customer prepares and consumes the product at his
convenience in his house
ii. Taste trial of drink by consumer in a hall
 Test Process in detail
i. Select customers that meet the TG/selection criteria
a. Selection criteria age, drinks MFD or such brand at
least 3 times in a week ( I am just illustrating)
b. Likes MFD drink
ii. Invite selected respondents to a hall
iii. Provide hot drink ( Do a separate study for cold?)
iv. Customers taste the product and then fill a questionnaire
a. Supplement filled questionnaire by interview and
ask more Why questions
v. Tasting and responding to happen in privacy for each
customer
 Alternate test process
i. Select customers that meet the TG/selection criteria
a. Selection criteria age, consumes MFD or such brand
at least 4 times in a month ( I am just illustrating)
b. Likes MFD as a food
ii. Provide a “brand-not-indicated test sachet --- 12 to 24
with the customer
iii. Visit the customer after 3 days and get feedback from the
person who prepared and the TG who consumed

Case Prepared by Prof. Surya Mahadevan for class discussion


 Question areas: Absolute feedback; followed by comparative
feedback on properties listed in objective
 Whom to test (Sample Profile): Cover all factors of heterogeneity
such as regional taste preferences, age, demographics
 Test Markets: Across all metros and few A class cities ( cover key
consumption markets)
 Sample Size: For each heterogeneity factor a sample size of 50 to
75 should be adequate. If there is sharp skew in results may have
to supplement after ascertaining factor contributing to skew
 Period: Simultaneous across markets and can be completed in 2 to
3 weeks’ time; depends on the number of variants and panels
 Rationale for study design: Objective feedback that isolates the
influence of brand and various other factors (Packaging, message
etc.)
Limitation: The study may not capture deep seated perception factors
relating to brand/communication
Answer Key to Part b)
Research Objective: Understand perception and preference about food
and nutrition and related factors. Understand whether MFD is consumed
as a milk replacement or as a nutrition additive
Research Design: Qualitative study
In depth interview or focus group discussion
Question areas: Discussion on food habits—open but guided by
facilitator
Sample Profile: Adult TG (Young adult, middle-aged and senior citizen)
but from different socio-economic class (Education and Income filters).
Also, panels for each region and key states
Sample Size: Each group can be of 8 participants and we can look at 3 to
4 groups of different Socio -economic profile for each region
Period: Simultaneous across markets and can be completed in 2 weeks’
time
Rationale for study design: Key insights on awareness association and
perception of food and nutrition and usage behaviour
Limitation: The study will provide insights, but we cannot quantify or
measure

Case Prepared by Prof. Surya Mahadevan for class discussion

You might also like