Table – 1: Basic Information Data Sheet for Selected PMGSY Roads

(Information to be provided by SRRDAs / informatory sign boards which is mandated for every PMGSY road)
1 Name  of Work  Pdg Stg on Barwala Matloda Sandlana
road in Hisar Distt (Road ID 5114)
under head PMGSY Phase -II
2 General
  Block / Taluk  Barwala
  District  Hisar
  Terrain Plain
3 Package No  HR06-25
4 Length  of road  (km) 6.73 Km 
5 No of habitations covered  4 Nos
6 Total population benefited
7 Type of  connectivity / improvement Upgradatrion
8 Total Estimated cost , Rs  369.91 Lakh
10 Date of starting the work  17.11.2016
11 Current stage of work  Completed
12 Date of completion of road work  15.05.2017
13 Any other salient  information SRRDA would like  N/A
to provide (technology used / supplier details, etc)
 DAY, DATE AND TIME

Table – 2: Data Sheet for Road Inventory Record

: Barwala Matloda
Name of road Terrain : Plain Date of Survey : 11.01.2020
Sandlana
CV/day…
Traffic intensity :240
Section : Year ……
No. of Traffic lanes : Single Lane Annual rainfall (mm) : 500

Subgrade soil type : Sandy

(m)Depth of water Table

(Y/N)Maintenance*
Carriageway width, (m)
GPS
Remark
co-ordinate Chainage Pavement Details Shoulder Drainage
s, if any
Height
of
Gradient

embank Road
ment/ surface

(m)width
Depth type
of Surfacing Base Sub-base Type Type Condition
cutting

(cm)Thickness

(cm)Thickness

(cm)Thickness
From To From To

Type Type Type

29°2 29°2
2'56. 2'56.
2"N 3"N FLEXI BM Brick
5.80 6.00 G.L - 7.0 WBM 30.0 GSB 22.5 5.50 Berms 0.91 25 Good Y
75°5 75°5 BLE + PC Masonry
7'51. 7'58.
5"E 8"E
29°2 29°2
3'04. 3'43.
1"N 9"N FLEXI BM Brick
6.57 9.45 G.L - 7.0 WBM 30.0 GSB 22.5 5.50 Berms 0.91 25 Good Y
75°5 75°5 BLE + PC Masonry
8'11. 9'44.
3"E 4"E
29°2 29°2
3'46. 3'59.
7"N 0"N
FLEXI BM Brick
76°0 76°0 10.40 11.66 G.L - 7.0 WBM 30.0 GSB 22.5 5.50 Berms 0.91 25 Good Y
BLE + PC Masonry
0'20. 1'00.
1"E 8"E

29°2 29°2 12.80 15.20 G.L - FLEXI BM 7.0 WBM 30.0 GSB 22.5 5.50 Berms 0.91 25 Brick Good Y
4'10. 4'35. BLE + PC Masonry
6"N 8"N
76°0 76°0
1'40. 3'03.
8"E 8"E

* If maintenance is provided, Table 2-A should be filled

 Table – 2A: Data Sheet for Maintenance Record

Chainage Maintenance Type of Treatment

Road Year of
Road Name (Routine/Preventive/ (Patching/Crack
Section From To Treatment
Periodic) Repair/Surface treatment, etc)
 Pdg Stg on Barwala Barwala 5.80 6.00 Nil - -
MAtloda Sandlana road in Sandlana
Hisar Distt (Road ID 5114) 6.57 9.45 Nil - -
Road
under head PMGSY Phase
10.40 11.66 Nil - -
-II
12.80 15.20 Nil - -
 Table – 3: Data Sheet for Recording Visual Distress Measurements (Distress Information to be Filled as per Proforma-1, IRC: 82 – 2015)

Name of the Road: Barwala Matloda Carriageway Width (m): 5.5

Sandlana Km……….. to km………..
Chainage of Test Section: 6.73 km Km……….. to km……….. Date of Observation: 11-03-2020
Type of Surface: Bituminous Top Weather Condition: Clear
Chainage Drainage
Edge Rut
Cracks Patch Potholes Bleeding Depressio Ravelling Shoving and
Breaking Depth Remarks, if any
From To (%) Work (%) (%) (%) n (%) (%) (%) Shoulder
(%) (mm)
Condition
5.80 6.00 0 0 0-5 0 0-5 0 0 0 0 Good
6.575 9.445 0 0 0-5 5-10 0 0 0 0 Good
10.40 11.66 0 0 0-5 0-5 0-5 0 0 0 Good
12.80 15.20 0 0 0-5 0-5 0-5 0 0 0 Good

Table – 4: Data sheet for recording distress measurements (Distress information to be filled as per Proforma-2, IRC: 82 – 2015)

Asphalt Surface Road Survey Data Sheet Surveyed by: Date: Sketch: 5.5m x 100m
Name and No. of the Road: Type of Surface:
Chainage of the Test Section: …………… km to …………. Km Carriageway Width (m):
Chainage of the Sub-Section: ……12.80… km to …..12.90…. km Date of Observation:
Lane number: Weather Condition:
Sample Area :
1. Alligator cracking 2. Patch work 3. Rutting
4. Potholes 5. Shoving 6. Bleeding
7. Depression & settlement 8. Edge breaking 9. Ravelling
10. Any other distress (not listed above)

Quantity
Distress Severity
Chainage Length Breadth Depth Area Total Density % Remarks, if any
Code Level
(m) (m) (mm) (m2)
12.89 3 10 1 10 10 550 0.02 HIGH Nil
- - - - - - - - - -
 Table – 5: Template for Roughness Recording using MERLIN

Survey by :
Road name :
Wheel path : Date : Surface temp :
Road section :
Time :
Sample Merlin Vertical Corrected Vertical
Number Profile length (m) Remarks
Reading (mm) Reading (mm)

Table – 6: Template for Roughness Reporting

Road name :
Wheel path :
Road section :

Chainage Date of
IRI (m/km) Remarks
From To survey

Note: IRI value should be average of left and right wheel paths. Over every km, the readings should be taken on the middle one third section.
 Table – 7: List of tests and frequency

Type of Test Frequency of test* Layers Limits

Subgrade and
CBR and density (IS:2720 Part 16 and 28) One test per 2 km
Granular Layers

CBR (IS:2720 Part 16) One test per 2 km Shoulder

Moisture content (IS 2720 Part 2) One test per 2 km Subgrade

Subgrade and
Index properties (IS 2720 Part 5) One test per 2 km
Granular Layers

PI of Shoulder material (IS 2720 Part 5) One test per 2 km Shoulder

All layers above As per project

Thickness of layers One test per 2 km
subgrade specification

Grading of aggregate IS:2386 Part 1 One test per 2 km All layers

Binder Content 506 of QA Handbook Vol

One test per 2 km Wearing course
I, NRIDA (ANNEX-V)
All layers above
Aggregate Impact Value IS:2386 Part 4 One test per 2 km
subgrade
Coating and Stripping of bitumen-
One test per 2 km Wearing course
aggregate mixtures IS:6241

Camber One test per km Wearing course

*The number of tests should be 1 test per 2 km or at known change in source of material.

Note: The Cu and Cc for the sub-base layers should also be assessed from the gradation to quantify the drainage capability of the layer.
 Table – 8: Proforma for Recording Pavement Deflection Data

Name of Road : Date and time of observation :

Section : Climatic conditions (hot/humid/cold) :
o
No. of traffic lanes : Air temperature ( C) :
Annual rainfall (mm) :
Whether temperature correction is to :
be applied (Yes/No)
Whether correction for seasonal
:
variation is to be applied (Yes/No)
Location of
Pavement Moisture Dial gauge reading Rebound
Sr. test point & Type of
temperature content Deflection
No. identificatio soil & PI
(oC) (%) Initial Intermediate Final (mm)
n of lane
 Table – 9: Recording Field Shoulder Condition

SHOULDER CONDITION SURVEY

Road Name : Road No. :
Addl. :
Section from: to: Station No. :
Information
Location km : Date & Day :
Weather :
Direction Towards : Hour :
Shoulder Drains Condition
Chainage Type of shoulder Width Remark (if any)
Terrain camber (Y/N) (G/F/P/VP)
(BT/CC/GR/ER) (m)
From To Left Right

5.80 6.00 Plain Earthen 0.8 3% 3% Y F

6.575 9.445 Plain Earthen 0.8 3% 3% Y F

10.40 11.66 Plain Earthen 0.8 3% 3% Y F

12.80 15.20 Plain Earthen 0.8 3% 3% Y F

Note:
Type: BT = Bituminous CC = Cement Concrete GR = Gravel ER = Earthen
Condition: G = Good F = Fair P = Poor VP = Very Poor
 Table – 10: Recording Field Drainage Condition

PAVEMENT WATER DRAINAGE DATA SHEET

Road Name : Road No. :
Addl. :
Section from: to: Station No. :
Information
Location : Date & Day :
Weather :
Direction Towards : Hour :
Chainages Type of Drain Length Type of Bed
Width of Depth of Direction Outfall
(Lined/ of Drain Drainage Inlet Slope Remark (if any)
From To Drain (m) Drain (m) of flow points
Unlined) (m) (K/G/C/SD/F) (+/-)

Note:
Type: K = In Kerb G = Grate inlet C = Combination Inlet S = Slotted drains F = Flanking inlet
 
 Table – 11: Recording Classified Traffic Volume - 24 hours count

CLASSIFIED TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNT SURVEY

Road Name : Road No. :
Addl. :
Section from: to: Station No. :
Information
Location : Date & Day :
Weather :
Direction Towards : Hour :
FAST MOVING VEHICLES SLOW MOVING VEHICLES Others (Pl.
Specify)

BUS TRUCK Agri. Tractor

Three
Time Two Arctic
Wheeler/ Car/Jeep/ Animal drawn
(minute Wheele LCV Mult With Withou
Auto Van/Taxi Min Ful 2- / Cycle
s) r i Traile t Cycle Bullock Hors
rickshaw i l Axle Semi Rickshaw
Axle r Trailer Cart e
Arctic

0-15 17 2 5 0 1 1 4 0 1 2 4 0 1 16 0 None

15-30 14 1 4 1 2 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 2 12 1 None

30-45 15 3 4 1 1 2 5 1 0 4 2 2 2 14 2 None

45-60 15 3 6 0 1 1 4 2 1 2 4 4 1 10 3 None

… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … …

… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … …

… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … …

TOTAL 466 67 125 14 18 25 42 12 14 90 23 67 57 80 43 Nil

 Table – 12: Format for Recording DCP Test Reading

Road Name :
Date :
Chainage from: to:
Addl. Information :
Location :
Number of DCP Scale Cumulative Penetration Per DCPI60, CBR, % Remarks
Blows reading, mm Penetration, mm Blow, mm mm
Appendix – A:
IRC: 82-2015 definition of distresses and severity level

Recording severity level of distresses provides significant insight about health of pavement. The distresses in pavements are
demonstrated by the severity levels of distresses and their extent. Therefore, treatment for a distress depends on the distress’s severity
level. The Table below provides details of pavement distresses and severity levels in bituminous pavements.

Table A1: Pavement distresses and severity levels in bituminous pavements

Severity Level
Distress
Low Medium High
Interconnected cracks, forming
Interconnected cracks, forming full
small area similar to the skin of an
Very narrow cracks which are often pattern area similar to the skin of an
alligator. The cracks may have
isolated and not interconnected. The alligator. The cracks may have signs
signs of slight spalling with no
depth and width of such cracks lies of spalling with pumping visible. The
pumping visible. The depth and
between 1 to 3 mm. depth and width of such cracks may
width of such cracks lies between
be more than 6 mm.
3 to 6 mm.

Alligator or
fatigue
cracking

Longitudinal Infrequent cracks of width 1-3 mm. Cracks of width 3-6 mm Frequent cracks of width more than 6
cracking mm.
 Severity Level
Distress
Low Medium High

Potholes of depth less than 25 mm Potholes that are deeper than 50 mm

Potholes 25 to 50 mm depth and
and width 200 mm are small or low and 500 mm wide are large or high
500 mm widearemedium severity.
severity. severity.

Potholes

Bleeding Isolated spots of fatty surface of less Bleeding over area in the range of Extensive bleeding and fatty surface
than 5 m2 area in a lane km and 1 to 5%. showing initiation of shoving.
restricted to only specific lane with
total area less than 1%.
 Severity Level
Distress
Low Medium High

4-10 mm deep longitudinal More than 10 mm deep longitudinal

depression in the pavement along the Not applicable depression in the pavement along the
wheel path. wheel path.

Rutting
Not applicable

When some loss of fines is Loose particles exist with some

Surface is too rough with loss of
associated with initial stage of loss having binder wearing out to
aggregates.
binder wearing out. a rough surface.

Raveling
Appendix – B:
Steps to calculate pavement condition index/rating using IRC: 82-2015
The steps to calculate pavement condition index/rating using IRC: 82-2015 is described as
follows:

Step-1: Individual distresses measured from field will be assigned rating value using Table
5.2, section 5.1 IRC:82-2015 (reproduced in this document, Table C). The ratings
value for each individual distress can be 1, 1.1 to 2.0, and 2.1 to 3.0 which
corresponds to poor, fair and good condition of road respectively.
Step-2: The rating values obtained from step-1 will be multiplied by an appropriate
weightage (from Appendix 4, Table-1 (reproduced in this document, Table D)) to
each individual distress, for calculation of the weighted rating value of each
individual distress.
Step-3: The final rating value is calculated by taking the average of the weighted rating
values of all the distresses.

Table B1: Individual distress rating value for rural roads PCI calculation (IRC:82 – 2015)
Defects Range of Distress
Cracking (%) >20 10-20 <10
Ravelling (%) >20 10-20 <10
Pothole (%) >1 0.5 to 1 <0.5
Patching (%) >20 5-20 <5
Settlement and depression (%) >5 2 to 5 <2
Rating 1 1.1-2 2.1-3
Condition Poor Fair Good

Table B2: Individual distress weightage for PCI calculation

Weightage (Fixed)
S. No. Defects
(Multiplier Factor)
1 Cracking 1.00
2 Ravelling 0.75
3 Pothole 0.50
4 Shoving 1.00
5 Patching 0.75
6 Settlement 0.75
7 Rut Depth 1.00
Example:
The following distresses were observed during a distress survey over a road section:
Cracking: 9%, Ravelling: 8%, Potholes: 0%; Patching: 5% and Settlements: 4%.

Table B3: Weighted rating value for the surveyed road section
Rating as Weighted
Input Weightage,
Distress Type per Table Rating
(%) Table B2
B1 Value
Cracking (%) 9.00 2.91 1 2.91
Ravelling (%) 8.00 2.82 0.75 2.12
Pothole (%) 0.00 2.1 0.5 1.05
Patching (%) 5.00 1.1 1 1.10
Settlement and depression (%) 4.00 1.7 0.75 1.28
Final Rating Value 1.69
Condition Fair

In case of rural roads, periodic renewal treatments may be decided when condition rating reaches
to a value of 2 to 1.