Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 43 views

    M2A1: Review and Application of Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions Paper

    Uploaded by

    Eman Wahid
    This document discusses applying Hofstede's cultural dimensions to understand differences between Germany and the US. It analyzes each country's scores on dimensions like power distance, individualism, masculinity, and uncertainty avoidance. It recommends the US adopt practices from Germany like long-term orientation and collectivism. Effective preparation is needed when sending expatriates abroad, including cultural training, legal knowledge, language skills, and support upon returning.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    M2A1: Review and Application of Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions Paper

    Uploaded by

    Eman Wahid
    43 views5 pages
    This document discusses applying Hofstede's cultural dimensions to understand differences between Germany and the US. It analyzes each country's scores on dimensions like power distance, individualism, masculinity, and uncertainty avoidance. It recommends the US adopt practices from Germany like long-term orientation and collectivism. Effective preparation is needed when sending expatriates abroad, including cultural training, legal knowledge, language skills, and support upon returning.

    Original Title

    M2A1_Review_and_Application_of_Hofstede_s_Cultural_Dimensions_Paper_13_Sept_2020_

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document discusses applying Hofstede's cultural dimensions to understand differences between Germany and the US. It analyzes each country's scores on dimensions like power distance, individualism, masculinity, and uncertainty avoidance. It recommends the US adopt practices from Germany like long-term orientation and collectivism. Effective preparation is needed when sending expatriates abroad, including cultural training, legal knowledge, language skills, and support upon returning.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    43 views5 pages

    M2A1: Review and Application of Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions Paper

    Uploaded by

    Eman Wahid
    This document discusses applying Hofstede's cultural dimensions to understand differences between Germany and the US. It analyzes each country's scores on dimensions like power distance, individualism, masculinity, and uncertainty avoidance. It recommends the US adopt practices from Germany like long-term orientation and collectivism. Effective preparation is needed when sending expatriates abroad, including cultural training, legal knowledge, language skills, and support upon returning.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 5

    M2A1: Review and Application of Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Paper

    Hofstede's social estimations have been applied by various individuals and get-togethers to
    understand contrasts in culture among social requests. Hofstede developed this model by
    taking a gander at social orders of changed social requests. This paper will apply Hofstede's
    social estimations in taking a gander at the progressive lead of Germany and the US. The paper
    will moreover discuss certain social orders that are additionally intriguing and which the US
    should get. Moreover, the proposals on getting ready alienates from the US to fit in Germany
    will be analyzed. From the site, the US is before Germany concerning control partition “Power
    Distance”. The US has a score of 40 while Germany has a score of 35 out of 100 ("Country
    Assessment - Hofstede Encounters", 2018). What this derives is that the organization has the
    best say concerning making and execution of decisions. Autonomy levels in the US are a lot over
    those of Germany. Freedom looks at the level of dependence that an organization holds among
    its investments. The freedom “Individualism” has a score of 91 in the US while in Germany it is
    67. Looking at the masculinity estimation, it has a higher score in Germany than in the US. This
    can be credited to the way that Germans like to try to increment higher certainty and cultural
    position. Germany furthermore records a higher score than the US concerning weakness
    avoidance. Germans need to sidestep weaknesses by searching for the help of experts. This can
    be credited to their low power division which they endeavor to reimburse by having raised
    degrees of weakness avoidance ("Country Relationship - Hofstede Encounters", 2018). If we talk
    about the “Masculinity”, a high score (Masculine) on this estimation shows that the overall
    population will be driven by competition, achievement and accomplishment, with progress
    being portrayed by the "victor" or "best-in-the-field". This value structure starts in puberty and
    continues for an astonishing term – both in work and unwinding interests. The US has a score of
    62 while Germany has a score of 66 out of 100 ("Country Assessment - Hofstede Encounters",
    2018). The “Uncertainty Avoidance” the US has a score of 46 while Germany has a score of 65
    out of 100 ("Country Assessment - Hofstede Encounters", 2018). The “Uncertainty Avoidance”
    means the dimension Uncertainty Avoidance has to do with the way that a society deals
    with the fact that the future can never be known. The US has a score of 46 while Germany
    has a score of 65 out of 100 ("Country Assessment - Hofstede Encounters", 2018). The “Long-
    term Orientation” dimension describes how every society has to maintain some links with
    its own past while dealing with the challenges of the present and future, and societies
    priorities these two existential goals differently. T he US has a score of 26 while Germany
    has a score of 83 out of 100 ("Country Assessment - Hofstede Encounters", 2018). The
    “Indulgence” dimension is defined as the extent to which people try to control their
    desires and impulses, based on the way they were raised. The US has a score of 68 while
    Germany has a score of 40 out of 100 ("Country Assessment - Hofstede Encounters", 2018).

    The following is the image related to country comparison on Hofstede’s website.

    I am intrigued by the "inquisitive and different ways" various social orders get about. It's
    basically that I have shown up at the goal that what I'm genuinely experiencing, What I am
    really getting some answers concerning when past shared trait is the methods by which my
    unchallenged predispositions arrange against seeing them from the substitute perspectives that
    development gives. It's about contrast, and the things I see abroad that stand separated says
    additionally with respect to me and my lifestyle than of the lifestyle I'm watching… taking
    everything into account; I've been an American individual brought into the world after WW2 for
    as long as I can remember… how could making an excursion to various countries change that?
    Eventually, I've lived abroad for quite a while and traveled generally all through Southeast Asia,
    yet what shows up clear to me at present is that I truly got acquainted with myself and how my
    own particular manner of life has framed the way wherein I measure things than I might do
    about the external countries and social orders I've visited and the people I've met on the way.

    I would like to suggest the long term orientation should be applied and implement in the US. As
    you can see the Germany has a high score in “Long Term Orientation”. Germany's high score of
    83 shows that it is a sensible country. In social requests with a coherent bearing, people
    acknowledge that reality depends particularly upon condition, setting and time. They show an
    ability to alter shows viably to changed conditions, a strong affinity to save and contribute
    cheapness, and determination in achieving results. US can learn such things and improve their
    cultural values and gain people trust more in the society.

    The second important thing which US should learn is “Individualism”. In my point of view, high
    score in individualism indicates weak interpersonal connections who are not the part of core
    family. High IDV score shows slight social relationship among the people who are not part of a
    middle "family." Here, people accept less risk for others' exercises and results. In a collectivist
    society, in any case, people should be dedicated to the get-together to which they have a spot,
    and, consequently, the get-together will secure their tendencies. The social occasion itself is
    consistently greater, and people expect obligation for one another's thriving. In Collectivist
    social requests people have a spot with 'in get-togethers' that manage them as an end-result of
    devotion. US can learn this cultural dimension so people get more close to the other groups as
    well.
    Training in the countries culture, government regulations and laws, communication in
    international business practices, healthcare access, security, safety, staying connected while on
    assignment in other countries as an expatriates and follow and implement all said things to
    provide best results. The following are the recommendations for the expatriates.

    Clear understanding of their role, Better integration, Provide a detailed overview of the cultural
    differences between home and host countries, Develop emotional flexibility to accept
    unfamiliar behavior and values are effective ways of doing things. Help the expatriate to evoke
    a sense of respect towards the culture and norms of their host country and to enact change in a
    culturally sensitive way and to Improve language skills.

    The following are the major aspects on which the expatriate should take care of it.

    1. Culture
    2. International Business
    3. Government Regulations and Laws
    4. Healthcare
    5. Security and Safety
    6. Support and Connected

    A productive bringing home not simply ensures about the continued with work of the expat,
    anyway achieves a supporter who twists and transforms into a positive promoter of the
    program. This requires masterminding before the expat goes on task similarly as a typical
    appreciation of what their return will take after and the duties the association is anxious to
    make upon the expat's return.

    The following are the elements of successful repatriation program.

     Educate and engage others


     Compensation
    Career development
     Ongoing support
     Families
     Continuous improvement

    References:

    https://www.Soomo, L. (2017). National Culture and Diversity in Organizational Behavior.   

    Bauer, T., & Er

    https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison/germany,the-usa/

    https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison/germany/

    https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_66.htm

    https://rsmus.com/what-we-do/services/tax/international-tax-planning/global-mobility/top-6-
    considerations-for-successful-employee-repatriation.html

    You might also like