Social Change Module 1 PDF
Social Change Module 1 PDF
LEARNING
OBJECTIVES
After successfully completing this module, the learners should be able to:
▪ Explain the meaning and nature of social change ;
▪ Explain capitalism as driving force of social change;
▪ Identify the founders and their contributions to sociological thinking;
▪ State and explain the theories of social change; and
▪ Critique the effect of technology to social change and the connections of social change
and the natural environment.
TOPIC
OUTLINE
A. Definition of concepts
B. Patterns of social change
C. Process of social change
D. Sources of social change
E. Means of social change
F. Classical theories of social change
G. Emerging theories of social change
OVERVIEW
Social change is all around us. The Philippines of the 1990s is obviously different to that
of the 1960s and if we can predict the future, that of the 2010s. The social political and
economic face of contemporary Philippines has been shaped by the driving force of
industrial capitalism. It is indeed important to know the dynamics of social change under
capitalism ad the ways in which it impacts on society.
Understanding the processes of social change is also important and it allows us to more
fully appreciate the social origins of our attitudes, values, and norms and reflecting on
how they also change over time. Thus, it can remind us of the human authorship of
society, its institutions and its characteristics.
Professional social workers are promoters of positive social change and one of the key players
in societal development.
Perspectives/ Theories on
Perspectives in Working with
Community/ Organizations/ Socio
Communities and Aggrupation
cultural Aggrupation
-ctural Aggrupations
- refers to change in the nature, the social institutions, the social behavior or the social
relations of a society or community of people.
Ex. The restructuring of the Philippine society from agricultural to an industrial society
constitute social change.
Social change- refers also to acts of advocacy for the cause of changing society in a positive
way.
- Fast, radical, sudden, and revolutionary, it might even take people by surprise.
1. Linear social change: social change follows a straight path e.g. social Darwinism,
spencer, Durkheim, Toinnes
2. Cyclical: social change follows a cycle, e.g. “ history repeats itself” (Plato, Spemgler)
3. Dialectical: spiral..thesis-anti thesis-synthesis (Hegel, Marx)
According to Thomas Kuhn, …”The historian of science may be tempted to exclaim that
when paradigms change, the world itself changes with them. Led by a new paradigm,
scientist adopt new instruments and look in new places. Even more important, during
evolutions, scientists see new and different things when looking with familiar
instruments in places they have looked before. It is rather as if the professional
community had been suddenly transported to another planet where familiar objects
are seen in a different light and are joined by unfamiliar ones as well”. ( Kuhn, The
structure of scientific revolutions)
1. evolutionary theory
- explains how one social form evolves into another. They maintain that society
progresses from a simple beginning to a more complex form. From homogeneity to
heterogeneity, from archaic to a civilized, from primitive to modern, from rural to urban. This ,
they believe, is the inevitable direction in the evolution of society.
Herbert Spencer
Leslie White
Gerhard Lenski
Emile Durkheim has proposed that simple societies progress to complex ones by the action of social
forces such as increase in population, division of labor and their type of solidarity or cohesion.
Organic solidarity- more formal means to hold society together are developed such as central
government and legal institutions.
2. Cyclical Theory
This theory posits that every society undergoes a phenomenon of cyclical change, a pattern of
subsequent and recurring phases of growth and decline.
- Argues that every society has a natural life cycle: death, followed by the birth of
some new social order.
3. Equilibrium theory
Views society as tending toward a state of stability or balance. Thus, when sudden changes
cause disruptions, those disruptions are only temporary.
4. Conflict theory
Marx argued that conflict is the law which civilization has followed to the present day. –
without conflict, there is no progress.
1. Shifting population
2. technological innovation
4. diffusion - refers to the process by which one society to another through two different cultures.
▪ Diffusion: act of spreading ideas, beliefs, objects etc. through migration, colonization,
mass communication etc.
▪ Revolution: a radical social change usually through armed strategies where the victors
have the power to install new structures and systems
▪ Terrorism: random acts of violence to make the world know that those committing
these have the power to destroy those whom they think are the enemies but oftentimes
the victims are innocent people
Non Marxist: Ralf Dahrendorf- society changes due to the dialectical interaction
between opposing ideas or groups.
▪ Macro Theories
▪ Micro Theories
( Individual or personality theories)
A. all societies are linked via series of economic, social, cultural and political exchanges which
are based on this socio-economic system we call capitalism.
B. Capitalism is “an economic system based on private ownership of wealth, which is invested
and reinvested in order to make profit’.
C. the economic base of capitalism ( the way the economy is structured) thus reflects a quest
for profit and wealth which is kept by individuals.
1. social structures- enduring patterns found within a society. Ex. State- which
encompasses both a political system and its public service operations and bureaucracies.
III. Founders:
-Commonly called the ‘founder of sociology”, it was Comte who coined the term sociology and
argued that the scientific method could be applied to the study of society. He also set the parameters
of the subject by suggesting that it should focus on both social stability and social change.
-It was Spenser who viewed society using what is called the biological analogy. He viewed
society as being like living organisms, with interdependent parts which contribute to the survival of the
whole. He also picked up on Darwin’s theory of evolution and applied it to societies in order to
understand the processes of change which occur.
Marx believed that it was the role of social science to both understand and change society. His
goal was the development of society which was socially just, and in which structures of exploitation
were replaced with those which facilitated the common good, His critique of capitalist social and
economic relations led him to emphasize the role of the economic sphere in all forms if social life. For
Marx, if the economic sphere is based on systems of exploitation ( such as is the case with capitalism),
them society would also be exploitative, unequal, and unjust.
It was Durkheim who argued for the study of social structures. In order to understand their role
in society, he argued , you must look at what function they have. For example, to study the family, you
must ask yourself what function the family plays in society. Another important contribution by
Durkheim was his work on suicide. His analysis led to the conclusion that, rather than being an
individual act, suicide is actually influenced by social conditions.
Much of Weber’s work was concerned with the changes which he like the others, foresaw as
being a consequence of the rise of industrial capitalism. He disliked this form of society, which he saw
as resulting in humanity being trapped in what he described as an iron case ( the result of a society
which had, as dominant values, notions of rationality and technical efficiency). While the writings of
Marx had a profound influence on Weber, he disagreed with Marx on a number of issues, particularly
his economic determinism and the idea of social science knowledge being used to intervene in social
processes in order to facilitate social change.
I. Theories:
A. Functionalist
C. Interactionist
b. It is our practice and actions that shape the kind of society we have
There is a very concrete implication for social work practice of one’s perspective on society: it
points to certain directions as to the sources of problems and solutions.
The critical tradition of social work is founded on a particular perspective of society and social
change. We will use this perspective in looking at Philippine society.
- human society progresses from simple to more complex forms- from a backward to an
advanced state- by means of continuous processes of growth and differentiation.
- viewed as unilinear. All human societies follow a singular and particular course between the
‘simple primitive’ and the “complex modern”
4. World-System: The realities in a particular country can only be fully understood by seeing them in
the bigger global context.(c)
Objective: As an output, students will be able to create an electronic collage and demonstrate their learnings
about social change.
Task: Get some pictures that depicts your learnings about social change to be used for your electronic collage.
Then, write a one paragraph explanation of your work.
SUMMARY
Understanding society and change allow us to understand fully the changes of our country and
to the lives of Filipinos. Models of social change allow us to critically evaluate the ways in which
social change occurs as well as its possible results.
Sociological theory concerned with understanding the nature of society and its relationships to its
members is very important for discussion. Social scientist focus on things like institutions,
dimensions of inequality, power and so on as well as the ways in which human beings learn from
each interaction with one another. Also, an influence on the structures society as well as the
dominant norms, values and beliefs can be seen to derive from wats in which people have
attempted to understand the forces of social change.
REFERENCES
Stafford C.& Furze B. (1997). Society and Change. A sociological introduction to Contemporary Australia.
MacMillan Education Australia Pty Ltd.
Martinussen, John. (1997). Society, State and Market: A guide to competing theories of development. Zed Book
Ltd, London and New Jersey, Fernwood Publishing, Halofax, Nova Scotia.
McMichael, Philip (2008). Development and Social Change. A Global Perspectives. Pine Forge Press.
Prepared by:
CHERYLL A. ESCANO,RSW,MSW