Contemporary Issues in Maritime Casualty Investigation: Dr. - Ing. Jens - Uwe Schröder
Contemporary Issues in Maritime Casualty Investigation: Dr. - Ing. Jens - Uwe Schröder
ESSP
investigation
casualty investigation
n Master Mariner
n Transportation
Engineering (MSc)
World Maritime University
Example BÖHLEN
n Grounding
1976
World Maritime University
Deviation of 30 nm
Torrey Canon
World Maritime University
Accidents – a need to
investigate?
1 Major accident
World Maritime University
30 Minor accident
H.W. Heinrichs scheme concerning the relations of serious accidents and unsafe conditions)
Accidents – a need to
investigate?
2000
Total losses (in 1000 gt)
World Maritime University
1500
1000
500
0
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
Year
Total losses of ships of more than 500 GT between 1994 and 1999 (Source: ISL)
Accidents – a need to
investigate?
1
World Maritime University
0.75
1.000.000 US Dollar
0.5
Damage
0.25
0
1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
Year
Development of the average damage amount for major accidents in the UK P&I club Source: UK P&I club
Technical
World Maritime University
Failure
20%
Human error
80%
Image of seafaring
World Maritime University
Maritime casualties
and their impact
Year Ships name Measures adopted In force
Argo
1976 n MARPOL (1973) – Protocol of 1978 1983
Merchant
Double-hull tankers
World Maritime University
Functions of marine
casualty investigation
Scientific
World Maritime University
Legal
Educational
Practical
Current status of HE
detection in casualties
n Missing data
n Overemphasis of technical
World Maritime University
aspects
n Missing agreed definitions,
procedures etc. in marine
casualty investigation
n Lacking concentrated efforts
n Framework for
marine casualty
World Maritime University
investigation
n Data situation
n Accident
process
Method
Focus of Investigating
Analysis Taxonomy Model
investigation body
Conclusion
IMO
and incidents
IMO code
n James Reason
– Generic Error Modelling
system
World Maritime University
n Skill-based
n Rule-based
n Knowledge-based
– Accident causation
model
n Hierarchy oriented
Fire detection 0
World Maritime University
Results 6%
Human Element -
Introduction
Performance
demands
World Maritime University
Monitored Process
Problem Performance
shaping factors
Number
of goa the day
ls Time of
World Maritime University
Fatigue, stress
Available time
ation
Crew cooper Working conditi
ons
isation Sufficient
Organ training
Why to investigate
Human error ?
Number the day
of goa ls Time of
Fatigue, stress
World Maritime University
Available time
? Crew cooper
ation
isation
Working conditi
ons ?
Organ Sufficient
training
Accident process
Technical Return
failure to normal
World Maritime University
yes
Human
Dangerous Adequate Near
operator
situation Defences ? miss
failure
yes
no
Adequate
Organisational Developing
(human)
failure incident
recovery ?
no
Accident
Source: van der Schaaf et al. (1996)
Stop
Human Dangerous
Near miss
evacuation
failure situation
World Maritime University
Release extern.
Accident support
Organisational
failure
Monitoring
Preparation of system recovery
evacuation
yes yes
System
System Calling for
recovery
assessment external support
possible System
yes
recovered
no Emergency
yes yes yes response actions no
Failure Situation Initial System Further
detection assessmt. response recovered? no data
input
no no no
Evacuation
Total loss
Abandon ship
n Decision support
systems
n Maritime
education and
training
Maritime education
and training
n Training
n Simulation
World Maritime University
Conclusions
n New quality in
casualty
investigation
World Maritime University
n HE has to be
treated more
systematic