HLTH103 TANDUKAR-

220193829.pdf
by Sushma Tandukar

Submission date: 14-Oct-2019 10:16PM (UTC+1100)

Submission ID: 1192470895
File name: 154703_Sushma_Tandukar_HLTH103_TANDUKAR-220193829_1584548_567035479.pdf (416.67K)
Word count: 1756
Character count: 9766
3.1 APA-UNE _Title Page
 (O'Toole, 2012).

Brackets?

✔
 ✔

✔
 Good points

✔
Excellent͸
Handy - Hyperlinks
HLTH103 TANDUKAR-220193829.pdf
ORIGINALITY REPORT

25 %
SIMILARITY INDEX
9%
INTERNET SOURCES
0%
PUBLICATIONS
25%
STUDENT PAPERS

PRIMARY SOURCES

1
Submitted to University of New England
Student Paper 16%
2
Submitted to Queensland University of
Technology
2%
Student Paper

3
Submitted to Flinders University
Student Paper 2%
4
18900040blog.wordpress.com
Internet Source 1%
5
bear.buckingham.ac.uk
Internet Source 1%
6
Submitted to Kaplan University
Student Paper 1%
7
Submitted to University of South Florida
Student Paper <1%
8
Submitted to Clarkson College
Student Paper <1%
9
Submitted to Ohio University, Athens
 Student Paper

<1%

Exclude quotes Off Exclude matches Off

Exclude bibliography Off
HLTH103 TANDUKAR-220193829.pdf
GRADEMARK REPORT

FINAL GRADE GENERAL COMMENTS

Instructor

37
Greetings Sushma

Thank you for your submission.

I have assigned my blue tile comments to your written

/40
work and linked them to the marking rubric they have
short comments within them if you click on them
and have left the bulk of my written comment to this
area.

You have put a very good effort into your paper;

there are some various syntax issues with regards
to your standard of academic writing, which with
assistance from the Academic Skill Office (ASO) ASO
here which I recommend, practice and proofreading
will fix it.

In-text citations are proper, and the reference list is

comprehensive. I have left a blue tile on your reference
list if you click on that it has some useful hyperlinks in it
for you to copy and paste.

Overall you have provided a reflection that is detailed

on your communication style with an excellent analysis
that is linked to examples you have
used appropriate academic literature for your in-text
citations where required and your marks are very well
deserved.

Well done,

Good luck in your other subjects for this trimester.

Kind regards

Meredith Kellahan.

23/10/19

PAGE 1
 QM 3.1 APA-UNE _Title Page
The UNE - APA STYLE title page should contain ( in this order:)

student name, student number,

unit title & number,

paper title/name,

paper due date,

unit coordinator,

word count.

You do NOT decorate the page (e.g. graphics, photographs) unless you are asked to by the
lecturer. The font size should be no larger than 14pt and in Times New Roman or Ariel.

PAGE 2

Text Comment. (O'Toole, 2012).

Strikethrough.

QM ✔ | Rudiments

Good point/comment

Text Comment. Brackets?

Strikethrough.

QM ✔
Good point/comment

QM ✔ | Rudiments

Good point/comment

PAGE 3

QM ✔
Good point/comment

QM ✔
 Good point/comment

QM ✔
Good point/comment

QM ✔ | Rudiments

Good point/comment

QM ✔ | Mitigation

Good point/comment

QM ✔ | Mitigation

Good point/comment

PAGE 4

QM | Mitigation

Great information

QM | Mitigation

Great information

QM Good points
You have some strong points here.

QM ✔ | Awareness

Good point/comment

PAGE 5

QM Excellent͸ | Awareness

Great points here

PAGE 6

QM Handy - Hyperlinks
Purdue - Owl
Academic Skills - UNE

Assignment Types - UNE

UNE -Formatting Essay Fact Sheet

UNE - In-Text Ref APA Fact Sheet

RUBRIC: HLTH103 ASS 2 T2 2018 92.50 / 100

RUDIMENTS (25%) 95 / 100

Reflection (analysis) on the rudiments (qualities) of your own communication style • Strengths (Q 1 & 2) •
Limitations, ‘trouble spots’ , challenges (Q 4 & 8) • Interaction with other styles of communication (Q 6 & 7)

HD Comprehensive reflection on the rudiments of personal communication style with critical

(100) analysis that is very well linked to examples

HD Comprehensive reflection on the rudiments of personal communication style with critical

(95) analysis that is very well linked to examples

HD Comprehensive reflection on the rudiments of personal communication style with critical

(85) analysis that is very well linked to examples

D Detailed reflection on rudiments of personal communication style with good analysis that
(80) is well linked to examples

D Detailed reflection on rudiments of personal communication style with good analysis that
(75) is well linked to examples

C Sound reflection on rudiments of personal communication style with some analysis and
(70) examples

C Sound reflection on rudiments of personal communication style with some analysis and
(65) examples

P Basic reflection on rudiments of personal communication style which is purely descriptive

(60) with little or no analysis

P Basic reflection on rudiments of personal communication style which is purely descriptive

(55) with little or no analysis

P Basic reflection on rudiments of personal communication style which is purely descriptive

(50) with little or no analysis

N Inadequate reflection on rudiments of personal communication style with main points

(45) missed or not discussed

N Inadequate reflection on rudiments of personal communication style with main points

(40) missed or not discussed

N Inadequate reflection on rudiments of personal communication style with main points

(30) missed or not discussed

MITIGATION (25%) 95 / 100

Reflection (analysis) of how you can mitigate any negative aspects of your communication style • Develop new
strengths (Q 3) • Improve and control ‘trouble spots’ (Q 5) • Overcome challenges (Q 9)

HD Comprehensive reflection on personal communication style development (improvement)

(100) needs including examples from practice (or personal experience) that are very well linked
 to relevant substantiating literature

HD Comprehensive reflection on personal communication style development (improvement)

(95) needs including examples from practice (or personal experience) that are very well linked
to relevant substantiating literature

HD Comprehensive reflection on personal communication style development (improvement)

(85) needs including examples from practice (or personal experience) that are very well linked
to relevant substantiating literature

D Detailed reflection on personal communication style development (improvement) needs

(80) including examples from practice (or personal experience) that are well linked to relevant
substantiating literature

D Detailed reflection on personal communication style development (improvement) needs

(75) including examples from practice (or personal experience) that are well linked to relevant
substantiating literature

C Sound reflection on communication style development (improvement) needs with some

(70) analysis and substantiation from practice examples (or personal experience) and/or the
literature

C Sound reflection on communication style development (improvement) needs with some

(65) analysis and substantiation from practice examples (or personal experience) and/or the
literature

P Basic reflection on communication style development (improvement) needs which is

(60) purely descriptive with little or no analysis

P Basic reflection on communication style development (improvement) needs which is

(55) purely descriptive with little or no analysis

P Basic reflection on communication style development (improvement) needs which is

(50) purely descriptive with little or no analysis

N Inadequate reflection on communication style development (improvement) needs with

(45) main points missed, not discussed or wrongly identified

N Inadequate reflection on communication style development (improvement) needs with

(40) main points missed, not discussed or wrongly identified

N Inadequate reflection on communication style development (improvement) needs with

(30) main points missed, not discussed or wrongly identified

AWARENESS (25%) 95 / 100

Reflection (analysis) of why awareness of one’s communication style is vitally important when working in health
care (Q 10)

HD Comprehensive reflection on the importance of one’s communication style in healthcare

(100) settings with critical analysis that is very well linked to practice examples and
substantiating literature
HD Comprehensive reflection on the importance of one’s communication style in healthcare
(95) settings with critical analysis that is very well linked to practice examples and
substantiating literature

HD Comprehensive reflection on the importance of one’s communication style in healthcare

(85) settings with critical analysis that is very well linked to practice examples and
substantiating literature

D Detailed reflection on the importance of one’s communication style in healthcare settings

(80) with good analysis including practice examples with links to substantiating literature

D Detailed reflection on the importance of one’s communication style in healthcare settings

(75) with good analysis including practice examples with links to substantiating literature

C Sound reflection on the importance of one’s communication in style healthcare settings

(70) with some analysis and substantiation from practice examples and/or literature

C Sound reflection on the importance of one’s communication in style healthcare settings

(65) with some analysis and substantiation from practice examples and/or literature

P Basic reflection on the importance of one’s communication style in healthcare settings

(60)

P Basic reflection on the importance of one’s communication style in healthcare settings

(55)

P Basic reflection on the importance of one’s communication style in healthcare settings

(50)

N Inadequate reflection on the importance of one’s communication style in healthcare

(45) settings

N Inadequate reflection on the importance of one’s communication style in healthcare

(40) settings

N Inadequate reflection on the importance of one’s communication style in healthcare

(30) settings

WRITING (25%) 85 / 100

Standard of academic writing and referencing Note: remember that written communication is also a very
important aspect of communication in health

HD Extremely well written and comprehensively and accurately referenced; very good
(100) introduction, conclusion, sentence and paragraph structure

HD Extremely well written and comprehensively and accurately referenced; very good
(95) introduction, conclusion, sentence and paragraph structure

HD Extremely well written and comprehensively and accurately referenced; very good
(85) introduction, conclusion, sentence and paragraph structure

D Very well written and strongly referenced, few or no referencing errors; good introduction,
(80)
 conclusion, sentence and paragraph structure

D Very well written and strongly referenced, few or no referencing errors; good introduction,
(75) conclusion, sentence and paragraph structure

C Well written and well supported with references, some referencing errors or gaps; sound
(70) essay structure

C Well written and well supported with references, some referencing errors or gaps; sound
(65) essay structure

P Soundly written with basic referencing and or a number of referencing errors or gaps;
(60) adequate essay structure

P Soundly written with basic referencing and or a number of referencing errors or gaps;
(55) adequate essay structure

P Soundly written with basic referencing and or a number of referencing errors or gaps;
(50) adequate essay structure

N Poorly written with many grammatical errors, no or inadequate referencing; poor structure
(45)

N Poorly written with many grammatical errors, no or inadequate referencing; poor structure
(40)

N Poorly written with many grammatical errors, no or inadequate referencing; poor structure
(30)