FTMS PDF
FTMS PDF
FTMS PDF
© 2011 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
This paper is available on line at http://www.mcponline.org
This article provides an introduction to Fourier transform- sients produced by the image current. Consequently, they are
based mass spectrometry. The key performance charac- often referred to as Fourier transform-based mass spectro-
teristics of Fourier transform-based mass spectrometry, meters (FTMS).
mass accuracy and resolution, are presented in the view The combination of FTMS with ion preselection and frag-
of how they impact the interpretation of measurements in mentation devices and their coupling to reversed-phase liquid
proteomic applications. The theory and principles of op-
chromatography (LC) represents a ubiquitous approach to
eration of two types of mass analyzer, Fourier transform
both small molecule and proteomic analyses. Multidimen-
ion cyclotron resonance and Orbitrap, are described. Ma-
jor benefits as well as limitations of Fourier transform- sional LC separations have an important role to play in pro-
based mass spectrometry technology are discussed in teomics applications for reducing sample complexity, and
the context of practical sample analysis, and illustrated complement well the high dynamic range of detection in an
with examples included as figures in this text and in the acquisition offered by FTMS instruments.
accompanying slide set. Comparisons highlighting the The current article does not intend to be an exhaustive
performance differences between the two mass analyzers review paper on FTMS techniques; it is intended as teaching
are made where deemed useful in assisting the user with material for scientists without a physics background to assist
choosing the most appropriate technology for an applica-
them with understanding the mass spectrometry tools they
tion. Recent developments of these high-performing
are called to use in their everyday laboratory work. Thus, only
mass spectrometers are mentioned to provide a future
outlook. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 10: 10.1074/ the fundamental aspects of FTMS which are useful to a non-
mcp.M111.009431, 1–19, 2011. physicist are introduced. The discussion then focuses on
examples of where this technology can be applied and what
are the benefits as well as limitations of this technology for
Mass spectrometers have been used for a long time in a practical proteomic applications.
variety of biological applications. Recent years, however, Need for High Resolution and Mass Accuracy—The mass
have witnessed a significant increase in the employment of accuracy is the ratio of the m/z measurement error to the true
mass spectrometers such as of time-of-flight, Fourier trans- m/z, usually quoted in parts per million (ppm). The mass
form ion cyclotron resonance (FTICR)1, and Orbitrap, which resolving power (resolution) is the measure of the ability to
provide accurate mass of analytes over wide mass range. The distinguish two peaks of slightly different m/z, herein under-
FTICR and Orbitrap analyzers outperform any other com- stood as full width at half maximum (FWHM). Linearity of de-
monly used mass spectrometer with respect to the maximum tection and very high fidelity in the determination of frequency
mass resolution and accuracy routinely achievable even for are inherent to FTMS and allow very high resolving power, mass
small numbers of ions. Both these mass spectrometers share accuracy, and dynamic range to be achieved. But why would
certain features, such as an image current detection system one need high mass accuracy and high resolution?
and the application of Fourier transform mathematical oper- The benefit of measuring a compound’s mass with ade-
ations for generating mass spectra from time domain tran- quately high accuracy can directly determine its elemental
composition. Accurate mass thus acts as a powerful “filter”
From the ‡Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany; §Thermo useful for confirming the identity of a compound or even
Fisher Scientific, Hemel Hempstead, UK identification of an unknown. This is illustrated in Fig. 1 show-
Received March 8, 2011 ing the fragmentation (tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS))
Published, MCP Papers in Press, May 9, 2011, DOI 10.1074/
spectrum of flavonoid quercetin (m/z 303). Mass deviation of
mcp.M111.009431
1
The abbreviations used are: FTMS, Fourier transform-based mass less than 3 ppm for any detected fragment together with the
spectrometry; FTICR, Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance; richness of the fragmentation spectra itself enable confirming
FWHM, full width at half maximum; MS/MS, tandem mass spectrome- the elemental composition of the starting compound as well
try; mmu, millimass unit; RF, radiofrequency; SWIFT, stored waveform as providing useful hints to its structure.
inverse Fourier transform; MECA, multiple excitation collisional activa-
tion; SORI, sustained off-resonance irradiation; IR, infra red; IRMPD,
In many cases, however, additional information other than
infra red multiphoton dissociation; ECD, electron capture dissociation; just the accurate mass measurement will be needed to obtain
MSn, multiple levels of fragmentation; LTQ, linear trap quadrupole. correct elemental composition. This includes, among others,
restrictions for the number of elements considered, Lewis and viation) the number of possible peptide candidates drops
Senior chemical rules, or isotopic patterns (1–3). Other as- significantly. The accurate mass acts as a “filter” that is re-
pects of the usefulness of mass accuracy for small molecule flected in later statistical evaluations of the results through a
analysis include the application of mass defect (4). significant reduction in the number of potential false positive
In the context of proteomics the precursor masses are used identifications, thus resulting in a higher confidence for pep-
as constraints for database searches. Fig. 2 illustrates this on tide identification.
the example of human protein database (provided by D. Fe- The other observation that can be made from Fig. 2 is that
nyo). It shows how many peptides would match a database even with a very low mass deviation of 0.1 or 0.01 ppm (at
search based on the accurate mass of the peptide alone, present not attainable on any routinely used mass spectro-
considering mass deviations of 50, 20, 10, 5, 1, 0.1, and 0.01 meter) one will still encounter many cases in the human da-
ppm, respectively. From the inspection of Figs. 2A and 2B it is tabase in which more than one peptide will fit into the bin of a
clear that with an improved mass accuracy (lower mass de- selected peptide mass plus or minus its respective mass
TABLE I
Effect of mass resolution on the confidence interval of mass accuracy
(mass tolerance). Example of pesticide Pirimicarb (C11H18N4O2;
关M⫹H兴⫹ ⫽ 239.15025) illustrating how the mass tolerance can limit
the number of elemental composition suggestions, and hence greatly
assist a compound identification. Resolution 15,000 and 80,000
(FWHM) and CHNO elements considered in this example
Number of elemental
Resolution Mass tolerance (mmu) composition
suggestions
15,000 ⫹/⫺ 9 14
80,000 ⫹/⫺1.7 1
⫽ 2 (Eq. 3)
z ⫽ 冑 2qVtrap␣
ma2
(Eq. 4)
⫹ ⫽
c
2
⫹ 冑冉 冊
c
2
2
⫺
z2
2
(Eq. 5)
FIG. 8. Techniques applied in FTICR to excite a whole range of
m/z simultaneously.
As the deviation from the unperturbed cyclotron frequency detectable image current on the detection plates. Ions need
depends strongly on the trapping potential, trapping voltages to be coherently excited to a larger radius for a signal to be
as low as possible are used. detected. The ions will remain at this radius after the exci-
Finally, there is also a low frequency precession motion tation signal has been stopped until their energy is dissi-
known as “magnetron” described by pated by collisions with residual gas. This together with
dephasing of ion coherence, in which ions of the same
⫺ ⫽
c
2
⫺ 冑冉 冊
c
2
2
⫺
z2
2
(Eq. 6)
cyclotron frequency become distributed out of phase at the
same cyclotron radius, limits the extent of detection time.
The larger the size of the molecule and the higher the
The magnetron and trapping frequencies are usually much residual gas pressure inside the ICR cell, the shorter is the
lower than the cyclotron frequency. They are generally not time available for detection.
detected unless there is a small misalignment of the instru- All masses should receive a similar excitation to avoid mass
ment axis with the magnetic field, or the ion motion amplitude dependent detection conditions. A radiofrequency (RF) poten-
is so large that it becomes comparable with the dimension of tial is normally applied to a pair of excitation plates on oppo-
the ICR cell. Then they demonstrate themselves as small site sides of the ICR cell. In FTICR, instead of exciting and
sidebands of the peaks in the spectrum. detecting one mass (frequency) at a time, a whole range of
In conclusion, ions should enter the ICR cell at low kinetic m/z is excited simultaneously by usually applying one of the
energies so that they can be confined by relatively low trap- following techniques (Fig. 8).
ping potentials, and they should be located preferably in the Frequency sweep (chirp) excitation rapidly scans the fre-
center of the cell to take full advantage of the excitation quency range corresponding to the masses that need to be
conditions and the cell dimensions. excited (13, 14). A wide m/z range can be excited and a
Excitation of Ions in the ICR Cell—Because of the kinetic reasonably flat response can be achieved. However, shoul-
energy of the thermal motion, ions will have some very small ders remain at each end of the excitation range.
cyclotron motion even at room temperature and without any Because Fourier transforms work also in reverse, another
excitation. Such conditions, however, do not generate a way to produce an excitation waveform is to consider the
m A B
⫽ ⫹ 2 (Eq. 7)
z ⫹ ⫹
an elegant solution. There are, nevertheless, also other methods fields. High kinetic energy would be useful for collision-in-
that can be implemented to achieve homogeneity of the exci- duced dissociation (CID). For example, in a 3 T magnet using
tation field (24 –26). argon as a collision gas, an ion of 1000 Da at 1 cm excitation
Effect of Magnetic Field on Resolution (High Field Mag- radius has center of mass kinetic energy of 1.67 eV, whereas
nets)—The resolution at low pressure is given by (27, 28) in a 9.4 T magnet it would have 16.4 eV. This would translate
to a more effective fragmentation. But as mentioned already,
m 1.274 ⫻ 107 zB0Taqn
⫽ (Eq. 8) to carry out CID in the ICR cell, gas has to be admitted and the
⌬m m
pressure has to be raised. To resume analysis afterward,
wherein m/z is given in per elementary charge. Fig. 10 enough time needs to be allowed for the gas to be dissipated
shows the resolution achievable within a 1 s transient for and the ICR cell to return to the low pressure required for
magnetic field strengths of 1 to 40 T and for different masses. excitation and detection. It is much more practical to carry out
The values in this graph are for a nonapodized spectrum, CID outside of the ultra-high vacuum region in an external
which means that resolution of an apodized spectrum would analyzer or collision cell.
drop to about a half (in most cases it is not possible to infer d) Ion trapping duration—In the presence of collisions with
exact values for an apodized spectrum as each manufacturer residual gas in the ICR cell the ions lose kinetic energy. This
uses a different apodization algorithm). A detailed discussion means that the cyclotron radius decreases rapidly with time,
of the characteristics and advantages of high field magnets and simultaneously, the magnetron radius slowly increases.
can be found in Marshall et al. (29). Here, we will summarize The motion of ions becomes unstable when magnetron radius
some of the main points: happens to be significant in comparison to the cell radius. The
a) Mass resolving power and mass accuracy—The formula longer it takes for this to happen, the longer the time domain
(8) above shows clearly that resolving power (m/⌬m) will in- transient that can be achieved, and the higher the subsequent
crease linearly with increasing magnetic field (Fig. 10). Higher resolution. Employing higher magnetic field strength is advan-
mass accuracy can be achieved as a consequence of in- tageous as the time required for the ion magnetron radius to
creased resolving power. expand to the radius of the ICR cell increases in a quadratic
b) Data acquisition speed—The same formula also shows dependence with B.
that the time needed to acquire a time domain signal of a Another mechanism for ion loss in ICR is dephasing. Ions
given mass resolving power varies as 1/B. This can represent within the cloud of the same m/z value lose their coherence
a considerable gain in time. On some instrument designs this and over time become distributed at different cyclotron phase
benefit might not make a practical difference, however, as angles at the same radius. Ion cloud density, columbic
some fragmentation techniques performed in the ICR cell interactions with other ion packets, and magnetic field
require introduction of gas (for fragmentation or axialization). strength are all parameters that can affect dephasing.
This translates into an added time overhead of extra pumping e) Charge-related phenomena—In an ICR cell the existence
in order for the instrument to drop back to good vacuum of concentrated charge can be responsible for shifting and
levels before ion excitation and detection. broadening mass spectral peaks, sometimes to the extent of
c) Kinetic energy—Higher maximum ion kinetic energy for a merging peaks of similar mass into one. Such an artifact is
given excitation radius can be achieved with higher magnetic known as peak coalescence. The tendency of two ion packets
to coalesce drops with increasing magnetic field strength. In gies, carry out fragmentation experiments, and re-analyze the
practice, this (and not just a mere increase in resolution and products. Alternatively, the ions can be allowed to interact at
mass accuracy, which could be achieved by other means as low kinetic energies, preferably thermal, with electrons or
well, for instance by an improved ICR cell design as mentioned photons. This makes the ICR cell a reaction vessel, which, with
in Section Problems with Potential Field) tends to be the main some added time overhead, can be a tandem mass spectro-
reason one would consider using a bigger magnet having in meter in its own right. Here we mention the three main fragmen-
mind all the negative aspects this brings with it (e.g. consider- tation techniques used in the ICR cell, and discuss the advan-
able increase in cost and handling difficulties). tages and disadvantages of implementing them.
A different manifestation of charge-related effect can be Collisional-induced Dissociation—A technique traditionally
observed at low numbers of ions (⬍1000). Ions “evaporate” used in FTICR is the collision induced dissociation. Ions have
from the ion packet and a “comet tail” is formed (30). After to enter the ICR cell at low kinetic energies to be trapped
some time, depending on a particular ICR cell geometry and effectively by the trapping potentials being as low as possible.
magnetic field strength, ions of the ion packet spread into a These conditions, however, do not promote any fragmenta-
ring with no ability to induce image current on the detection tion. Ions need to be excited to larger radii to gain higher
plates. A limit on resolution is thus reached because of a kinetic energy. This excitation can be done resonantly for
shortened transient duration. The “comet tail” extension each mass employing one of the following techniques: multi-
rate will diminish at higher magnetic fields due to the de- ple excitation collisional activation (MECA) (31) where ions are
crease in the magnetron frequency which is responsible for resonantly excited and then allowed to relax by collisions;
this effect. very low-energy CID (32), which uses 180o phase shifts in the
Effect of Transient Time Duration on Resolution—Another excitation wave form; or the simplest to implement and at the
way to increase the resolution without using a bigger magnet is same time the most robust technique known as sustained
to allow for a longer transient acquisition. Fig. 11 compares the off-resonance irradiation (SORI) (33). In SORI, ions of a spe-
resolution achievable with magnets of 7 and 21 T for durations cific mass are excited by an RF field that is slightly off-
of transients of 1 and 5 s. Of course, there are limits because: resonance with the cyclotron frequency. As a result, ions are
a) long acquisition times might not be always practical, alternatively accelerated and decelerated with a period that is
particularly in the case of coupling to LC. reciprocal to the frequency mismatch.
b) there is only a limited amount of time the transient can be All these methods activate the ions not in a single event but
recorded before it dies out because of collisions with residual by using multiple collisions. Because collision gas is used in
gas. Although all mass spectrometers require vacuum for the the form of a pulsed valve opening on a millisecond time
analysis and detection of ions, the performance of FTMS is scale, a delay of several seconds is normally used to allow the
more sensitive to pressure than other mass analyzers. Vac- gas pressure to drop before resuming FTICR mass analysis.
uum of 10⫺9 to 10⫺10 Torr (1 Torr ⫽ 133.3 Pa) is required to Using activation by gas collisions the ions absorb energy in
achieve high resolution, vacuum requirements being more multiple steps, and because there is enough time for redistri-
stringent for higher-field magnets. bution of this energy in the molecule (a process defined as
Fragmentation in the ICR Cell—The ICR cell is able to “ergodic”) the weakest bonds tend to break first. As many
confine different masses, excite them to higher kinetic ener- post-translational modifications are labile, including phosphor-
FIG. 12. ECD fragmentation of an intact protein. Charge state 12⫹ of ubiquitin was fragmented using ECD. From the 72 theoretically
cleavable peptide bonds within ubiquitin sequence 71 have been cleaved obtaining 147 fragment ions in total. Courtesy of M. Zeller, Thermo
Fisher Scientific.
ylation, such moieties tend to break first. The fragmentation of cathode placed behind the ICR cell. Electron capture pro-
a peptide would not proceed any further because the rest of duces a radical cation [M⫹nH](n⫺1)⫹. which can dissociate via
the peptide can not be anymore excited by the original ap- a rapid, facile fragmentation of the N-C bond of the peptide
plied excitation frequency (the mass of the peptide has chain, producing mainly c and z type fragment ions (38).
changed by losing the modification moiety and its cyclotron ECD has some remarkable advantages as the fragmenta-
frequency is now different). tion is not directed by peptide bond protonation and shows a
Infra-red Multiphoton Dissociation—Another method to de- nonergodic nature (“nonergodic” means that the process
posit energy into the molecules is by photon absorption. Ions adds internal energy to the precursor faster than is the rate of
have been activated in the ICR cell by using both infrared (34, energy randomization). As a consequence, the fragmentation
35) and ultraviolet (36) photons. Although infrared multiphoton does not have to happen on the weakest bond within the
dissociation (IRMPD) was used initially for small molecules, it compound as would be the case with CID or IRMPD tech-
soon found an application in sequencing biomolecules (37). niques. Thus, fragile post-translational modifications within
The fragmentation spectra produced are similar to collision the peptide and protein sequence are preserved.
induced dissociation but with the added benefit of not requir- ECD allows site specific analysis of phosphorylation (39,
ing pulses of gas that spoil the vacuum conditions. Another 40), O- and N-linked glycosylation (41), or sulfation (42). ECD
benefit is that the ions start the mass analysis from the center holds much promise as a supplementary dissociation tech-
of the ICR cell (thus simplifying excitation and maximizing nique to CID for unambiguous protein identification, de novo
signal) because they have to be there for a successful inter- sequencing (43) and detailed protein characterization (44).
action with the laser beam. Nevertheless, a few hundred The method has been shown to distinguish leucine and iso-
millisecond up to a few second interaction time is required. leucine residues (45) and even differentiate between peptides
Electron Capture Dissociation—Electron capture dissocia- containing a D- or L-amino acid within its sequence (46). ECD
tion (ECD) has recently evolved as an alternate activation had also been applied to intact protein analysis (47) delivering
method, especially for peptide and protein sequencing. With a good level of fragmentation. Fig. 12 depicts sequence cov-
ECD, multiply charged (usually but not exclusively) cations are erage of ubiquitin (charge state 12⫹) obtained with ECD. From
irradiated with low energy electrons produced by an emitter the 72 theoretically cleavable peptide bonds (ubiquitin has 75
wherein constant “k” is proportional to the potential difference oscillations, i.e. ions should oscillate coherently. Radial and
between the central and the outer electrodes. rotational frequencies do not appear in the frequency spec-
Image Current Detection—Axial oscillation frequencies can trum precisely because of the fast loss of coherence caused
be directly detected by measuring the image current from the by dependence of these frequencies on the initial parameters
outer Orbitrap electrodes after it has been amplified. A broad- of the ions.
band detection is followed by a Fourier transform to convert Getting the Ions Inside—A very short packet of ions ejected
the recorded time-domain signal into a mass-to-charge spec- from an RF-only gas filled multipole (known as the C-trap in
trum (51, 52). the current instrument implementations because it is shaped
The image current is amplified and processed in a similar like a letter “C”) enters the Orbitrap analyzer off its plane of
way as for FTICR, resulting in comparable sensitivity and symmetry through a tiny hole in one of the outer electrodes.
signal-to-noise ratio. There is, however, an important distinc- As ions enter they experience an attractive field of the central
tion between the two FTMS systems; the square-root de- electrode, which increases very fast with time. This field
pendence originating from the electrostatic nature of the field bends their trajectories into circular arcs. The radii of the arcs
in the Orbitrap analyzer causes a much slower drop in resolv- become progressively smaller with every microsecond so that
ing power observed for ions of increased m/z. As a result, the ions cannot return to the entrance radius to hit the outer
Orbitrap analyzer may theoretically outperform FTICR in this electrode and thus be lost for detection.
respect for ions above a particular m/z (typically, above m/z The axial component of the electric field is proportional to the
1000 –2000) for the same length of time of acquisition. Fig. 14 distance from the plane of symmetry and so reaches substantial
contrasts the rate of the theoretical resolution drop in the two values at the point of entry. It starts to pull all ions toward the
types of FTMS as the mass of the ions under investigation plane of symmetry as soon as they enter the field. This initiates
increases. For that comparison a 1 s acquisition time was axial oscillations without any additional excitation.
used. Please note that the resolution quoted for the FTICR in Because of the pulsed extraction from the RF multipole,
this figure is nonapodized while the resolution of the Orbitrap which sends the ions into the Orbitrap, ions of each m/z (ion
is apodized (which means that the apodized resolution for the packet) enter the field practically simultaneously. The axial
FTICR would drop to about half of that displayed in this size of the ion packet remains almost unchanged and good
graph). coherence is provided automatically thus fulfilling this impor-
Sensitivity of image current detection is determined by the tant prerequisite for successful image current detection.
internal thermal noise of electronic components of the image After all ion packets across the mass range of interest have
current preamplifier. For the best present-day solutions it entered the field, ramping of the electric field stops, and the
corresponds experimentally to a limit of detection equal to potential of the central electrode is stabilized so that no fre-
5–10 elementary charges for a 1 s acquisition. quency drift can take place during the subsequent image
It is important to note that for ensembles of ions a nonzero current detection.
image current can be detected only if ions are moving in- Because of the strong dependence of rotational frequen-
phase with each other. This means that ions of each m/z cies on ion energies, angles, and initial positions, each ion
inside the Orbitrap analyzer should be concentrated in pack- packet quickly spreads over the angular coordinate and forms
ets that have an axial length shorter than the amplitude of a thin rotating ring. The whole ring then oscillates along the
central electrode harmonically with frequency dependent only Because of a weak dependence of sensitivity on detection
on the m/z of the ions. time, Orbitrap analyzers have an important advantage for
The very short time ions stay concentrated before forming chromatography: the dynamic range goes down much slower
the rotating ring means that space charge effects do not have with an increase of repetition rate in comparison to other
time to develop. Moreover, the existence of the central accurate-mass analyzers (e.g. TOF) (54). In this context it is
electrode in the middle of the ring effectively shields one part worth mentioning that the Orbitrap analyzer shows an insig-
of the ring from the other. A high space charge capacity can nificant trade-off in sensitivity versus resolving power.
be attained (millions of ions) before unwanted effects on the Linking the FTMS to Other Mass Spectrometers - Hybrid
mass spectrum (i.e. coalescence effects, loss of resolution, Systems—Although FTICR is an MS/MS instrument in its own
and mass accuracy) are observed. In FTICR for comparison, right and can achieve high resolution precursor ion selec-
all ions of the same mass remain in one line, and higher field tion—albeit with a time penalty for the isolation-fragmenta-
magnets need to be employed to mitigate the space charge tion-axialization-remeasurement process, and ion intensity
effects. penalty for high resolution precursor ion selection—there is a
Factors Limiting the Mass Resolving Power—For a com- significant advantage when a precursor ion selection device
mercial Orbitrap analyzer, nominal resolving power (apodized) such as a transmitting quadrupole and collision cell or a linear
of 100,000 FWHM at m/z 400 requires 1.07 s detection time. trap quadrupole with MSn capability is used. In the case of the
Under ideal conditions, the ions could remain in the analyzer linear trap quadrupole (LTQ) which carries its own detector,
indefinitely, and there would be no limit to the resolution MSn experiments at lower resolution can be carried out while
achievable. Unfortunately, collisions with residual gas, as well the high resolution measurement in the FTICR takes place.
as minuscule imperfections of the electrode manufacturing The situation is different for the Orbitrap analyzer. When an
limit the time a signal can be detected, and thus the maximum ion decays inside the Orbitrap analyzer its fragments will
resolving power of the analyzer. retain the same velocity as the parent ion had. As their energy
Collisions with residual gas cause a loss of coherence by remains proportional to their individual m/z, their trajectories
scattering the ions. First, the loss of ion momentum in colli- will become highly elliptical. Most of the fragments (except for
sions causes the coherent ion packet to “diffuse,” thus in- those that have m/z similar to that of the parent ion) will hit one
creasing aberrations and accelerating further “diffusion” due of the electrodes and thus be lost for detection. Although
to other factors like field imperfections. Second, collisions can there are technological answers to achieving MS/MS capabil-
lead to prompt or metastable ion fragmentation, which could ity within the Orbitrap field (51), the first commercial system
also lead to a direct loss of ions if the latter hit an electrode. introduced in 2005 was made by coupling the Orbitrap ana-
Both processes are random in time and, therefore, produce lyzer to a linear ion trap (LTQ) (Fig. 15). The resulting hybrid
noncoherent clouds of ions that cannot be detected by image MS system has an MSn capability and can use multiple frag-
current detection, even if ions are still stable within the trap. mentation methods (CID, higher energy collisional dissocia-
The time between collisions is inversely proportional to the tion (HCD), ETD). Another reason the linear ion trap was
residual pressure inside the trap and to the cross-section of chosen was because of its high sensitivity, accurate control of
an ion. For a pressure of 10⫺10 mbar (1 bar ⫽ 100 kPa), the the ion population, short cycle time, and high charge capacity
time interval between ion and gas collisions ranges from (55). A detailed description of the hybrid linear ion trap-Orbitrap
several seconds for small molecules to ⬍1 s for small- and instrument (LTQ Orbitrap) performance can be found in Ma-
medium-size proteins. One needs to remember that although karov et al. (56).
the time between collisions decreases for larger molecules Depending on the analysis requirements, the two mass
(i.e. higher collisional cross section) the percentage energy analyzers (the FTMS part and the linear ion trap part of a
loss per collision is smaller and multiple collisions need to hybrid instrument) can be used independently or in concert.
take place for the kinetic energy to be dissipated. By improv- The MSn spectra recorded by either of the analyzers are very
ing the Orbitrap vacuum below this level, isotopic resolution of similar, the only major difference being the resolution and
protein ions up to several tens kDa has been demonstrated mass accuracy of the observed peaks. A true parallel opera-
(53). tion is achieved by using the initial part of the transient still
In practice, resolving power achievable over a limited time being measured in the FTICR/Orbitrap analyzer to define the
frame characteristic for LC separations (typically 0.5 or 1 s) parent ion masses for the linear ion trap to fragment while the
rather than the best achievable resolution over an unlimited detection of the image current in the FTICR/Orbitrap analyzer
time frame becomes an important parameter. Resolving continues till the specified final resolution is reached. This
power is then limited only by the number of ion oscillations parallel mode of operation offers the ability for acquiring mul-
over this time frame, which is proportional to an axial fre- tiple MS/MS unit resolution spectra in the linear trap for every
quency of oscillations. As the axial frequency is inversely high resolution spectrum acquired in the FTICR/Orbitrap,
proportional to square root of m/z, resolving power over a which makes these systems so powerful for analyses of com-
limited time-frame also diminishes as (m/z)⫺1/2. plex mixtures.
TABLE II
Performance Characteristics of FTMS
Resolution achievable by FTICR and Orbitrap mass spectrometers for
Mass Accuracy—One of the most coveted attributes of a various m/z values considering a 1 second acquisition time. 9.4 T field
strength and two different Orbitrap analyzer designs (56, 62) are
mass analyzer is undoubtedly its mass accuracy. FTMS can
considered in these calculations. Please note that the values for FTICR
reliably deliver mass accuracy below 1 ppm (54, 57– 60). This are non-apodized while the values for Orbitrap are apodized.
accomplishment can be aided by exploiting the use of certain
Standard Compact
ubiquitously present background ions. Precision in peptide m/z 9.4 T FTICR
Orbitrap (56) Orbitrap (62)
mass measurement typically within 100 parts per billion (ppb)
(nonapodized) (apodized) (apodized)
have been achieved for many peptides in the LC/MS run
100 1,500,000 200,000 400,000
without requiring an internal standard. Often, such a result 1000 120,000 63,000 120,000
limits the peptide to a single elemental composition and, 5000 24,000 28,000 56,000
therefore, represents the highest useful accuracy.
Acquiring tandem mass spectra with a high mass accuracy
is an interesting alternative to classical data acquisition species with m/z 1000 matches that of the nonapodized 9.4 T
schemes where fragment ions are detected at much lower FTICR, and for a species with m/z 5000 it even outperforms it.
mass accuracy and resolution in the linear ion trap or triple Another challenge related to mass spectrometric detection
quadrupole. A higher mass accuracy of the detected frag- of large molecules is that each molecular species appears in
ments adds to the specificity of identifications. This makes up multiple charge states. Fig. 16 shows a spectrum of a mono-
for a lower number of MS/MS spectra acquired at high reso- clonal antibody (approximate mass 147 kDa) acquired during
lution compared with the acquisition on a faster but mere unit LC/MS analysis with Orbitrap detection (63). Each peak in the
resolution instrument such as an ion trap. A much greater spectrum corresponds to a specific charge state with the one
degree of confidence is, however, a decisive advantage in the in the middle being charge state ⫹55, with increasing charge
case of peptides with unexpected modifications (61). states to the left and decreasing to the right thereof. Each
Resolving Power—Very high resolution, indeed, can be charge state consists then of multiple peaks representing
achieved when long transients are recorded. On a 9.4 T FTICR adducts, many of them being various cations from salts and
mass spectrometer, for example, a 5 s transient could yield buffers, and each of these has in turn a large isotopic distri-
resolution of 6,000,000 at m/z 100, 600,000 at m/z 1000, or bution (a sort of a Russian doll effect, as illustrated with
120,000 at m/z 5000. One has to note that multiply charged myoglobin spectrum example in Fig. 17).
intact proteins would mainly appear in the 1000 –5000 m/z All this effectively means that our initial sample signal has
window; this makes the technique well suited for the study of split over a very large number of peaks, with subsequent
large protein molecules spurring recent interest in drug dis- negative impact on apparent sensitivity of detection. This
covery (biologicals). The problem is that achieving transients feature is intrinsic to all mass spectrometers using electro-
longer than 5 s for large proteins with corresponding large spray ionization producing multiple charged ions. It might be
collision cross sections is by no means routine even at the pertinent to note that using a matrix assisted laser desorption
very low pressures required for FTICR. ionization (MALDI) would not simplify the matter; an FTMS
It might be useful to compare resolution achieved by an detection of a species with m/z 150,000 (singly charged ions
FTICR and Orbitrap for various m/z values. Considering a 1 s are produced by MALDI) would require an extremely long
acquisition time which is fairly typical in proteomics experi- transient to reach any usable resolution. Employing a time-of-
ments as it matches the chromatographic scale of peptide/ flight (TOF) detector with MALDI source would fare no better
protein separations, Table II contrasts the performance of 9.4 because ions would have to be accelerated to many tens of
T FTICR with that of a standard (56) and a newer compact (62) keV for such a massive analyte to produce a measurable
Orbitrap design. The performance of the Orbitrap analyzer for a signal on the detector (64).
Improving Performance Characteristics of FTMS—Develop- the gap between the inner and outer electrodes. This provides
ment is focused on obtaining higher resolving power (and higher field strength for a given voltage leading to increased
hence better mass accuracy) over a fixed acquisition time. frequency of oscillations. Resolving power in excess of
One way to achieve this is to increase the frequency of ion 600,000 at m/z 195 and isotopic resolution of medium-size
oscillations in the analyzer so that more oscillations are sam- (approx. 40 kDa) proteins has been reported (65). For FTICR,
pled for each frequency or mass in the given time transient. the impact of larger field strength (a bigger magnet), improved
For the Orbitrap analyzer, this can be achieved via decreasing homogeneity of electric fields (both RF and DC) in the ICR cell,
effect of the ICR cell design, and a requirement for a far more An improvement in resolution almost by a factor of two can
precise control of the ion population within the ICR cell than result from the implementation of phase correction for FTMS
for the Orbitrap analyzer (see end of Section Image Current data. Fourier deconvolution-based phase correction consists
Detection) have been discussed in the Sections Mass Calibra- of a complex division of the time domain ICR signal by the
tion, Problems with Potential Field, Effect of Magnetic Field on spectrum of the time domain excitation waveform to yield a
Resolution (High Field Magnets), and Effect of Transient Time phased broadband response. The critical requirement for im-
Duration on Resolution above. plementing this process is that the detection event must
incorporate the excitation interval, and the excitation and
detection spectra must be temporarily synchronized.
In practice, this simultaneous excitation and detection is
very difficult because of detector saturation. Work in Mar-
shall’s lab showed how phase correction in FTICR could be
achieved, and magnitude and absorption spectra of electro-
spray-ionized ubiquitin, [M⫹10H]10⫹ (at 9.4 T) derived from
the same time-domain data were shown (66). Their approach
used a variable capacitor added between each excitation and
detection electrode pair, and the resulting bridge was manu-
ally tuned so that the coupling of the two opposite-phase
components of the differential excitation largely canceled at
the preamplifier input. Such “nulling” is increasingly difficult
for larger high-field instruments because of greater coupling
FIG. 18. Phase correction in the Orbitrap analyzer. Diagram capacitance of a large cell assembly and the required use of
showing three different ion signals (frequencies) that can be traced
a higher amplitude excitation waveform.
back to the point in time when they have an identical phase. This
“time ⫽ 0” corresponds to the time the ions leave the C-trap to enter Recently, another approach has been implemented (67).
the Orbitrap field. During the frequency sweep when the frequency which cor-
responds to a particular m/z is reached, these ions become development. For example, portable high resolution instru-
excited. As a result the time between excitation and detection mentation or novel geometry hybrid systems are just a few
is different for each m/z. The phase of every m/z needs to be lines of thought to mention.
calculated:
Acknowledgments—We would like to thank scientists from Thermo
冋冉 冊 册
Fisher Scientific who provided data, spectra and graphics used in
共e ⫺ i兲 many figures within this article and accompanying slide set, namely
i共i兲 ⫽ 0 ⫹ i共ti ⫹ tdelay兲 ⫽ 0 ⫹ i ⫹ tdelay
共sweeprate兲 Eugen Damoc, Robert Malek, Martin Zeller, and Marcus Kellmann.
Many thanks also to David Fenyo, Rockefeller University, USA, Eti-
where i and i are the phase angle and excitation frequency, enne Waelkens, University of Leuven, Belgium, and Pavel Bond-
respectively, for a particular m/z, 0 is the initial phase angle, arenko and Zhongqi Zhang from Amgen for allowing the use of their
e is the frequency at the end of the frequency sweep, and material in some of the figures.
tdelay is the time between the end of the frequency sweep and ¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Thermo Fisher
the detection. Scientific, Hanna-Kunath-Str. 11, 28199 Bremen, Germany. Tel: ⫹49
It should be noted that the accumulated cyclotron phase is 172 61 37 660; Fax: ⫹49 421 5493 396; E-mail: Michaela.
the sum of the phase accumulation during the frequency [email protected].
sweep plus a temporally increase between the instant of
REFERENCES
excitation and detection. The final frequency of the frequency
1. Kind, T., and Fiehn, O. (2006) Metabolomic database annotations via query
sweep, the rate of sweep and the delay between the end of of elemental compositions: Mass accuracy is insufficient even at less
the sweep and the detection can be approximated, and the 0 than 1 ppm. Bioinformatics 7, 234 –244
remains to be estimated by varying it from 0 to 2 in 1 degree 2. Kind, T., and Fiehn, O. (2007) Seven Golden Rules for heuristic filtering of
molecular formulas obtained by accurate mass spectrometry. Bioinfor-
increments for each spectrum. The 0 that optimizes the matics 8, 105–125
whole spectrum should be chosen rather than the one that 3. Böcker, S., Letzel, M. C., Lipták, Z., and Pervukhin, A. (2009) SIRIUS:
optimizes only one peak. decomposing isotope patterns for metabolite identification. Bioinformat-
ics 25, 218 –224
Phase correction is much simpler in the Orbitrap (62) because 4. Zhu, M., Ma, L., Zhang, H., and Humphreys, W. G. (2007) Detection and
there is no excitation step and the t ⫽ 0 is the time of ejection structural characterization of glutathione-trapped reactive metabolites
from the C-trap. The entire injection path is thus equivalent to an using liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry and
mass defect filtering. Anal. Chem. 79, 8333– 8341
extension of axial oscillations “back in time,” as shown in Fig. 5. Cox, J., and Mann, M. (2009) Computational principles of determining and
18. An improvement in resolution of 1.6 –1.7 fold was observed improving mass precision and accuracy for proteome measurements in
when analyzing charge state 47 of intact yeast enolase (46.64 an orbitrap. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 20, 1477–1485
6. Scheltema, R. A., Kamleh, A., Wildridge, D., Ebikeme, C., Watson, D. G.,
kDa) using the standard Orbitrap instrument (Fig. 19). Barrett, M. P., Jansen, R. C., and Breitling, R. (2008) Increasing the mass
9. Summary—FTMS has become the workhorse of pro- accuracy of high-resolution LC-MS data using background ions – a case
study on the LTQ-Orbitrap. Proteomics 8, 4647– 4656
teomics applications. Introduction of the Orbitrap analyzer 7. Wobschall, D. (1965) Ion cyclotron resonance spectrometer. Rev. Sci.
and its incorporation into hybrid systems, notable for their Instrum. 36, 466 – 476
ease of use and robustness, has brought the FTMS into the 8. Comisarow, M. B., and Marshall, A. G. (1974) Fourier transform ion cyclo-
tron resonance spectroscopy. Chem. Phys. Lett. 25, 282–283
majority of proteomics facilities and independent laboratories. 9. Rempel, D. L., Huang, S. K., and Gross, M. L. (1986) Relation of signal
Currently, resolution in the order of millions can be achieved sensitivity and ion z-motion in cubic cells. Theory and implication for ion
by FT mass spectrometers, namely FTICR, where users tend kinetic studies. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Proc. 70, 163–184
10. Kofel, P., Allemann, M., Kellerhals, H. P., and Wanczyk, K. P. (1986)
to utilize long transients. In the proteomic arena, resolving Coupling of axial and radial motions in ICR cells during excitation. Int. J.
power of 100,000 offered by both types of FTMS instruments Mass Spectrom. Ion Proc. 74, 1–12
within 1 s acquisition time seems to solve the majority of 11. Mitchell, D. W., Rockwood, A. L., Chen, R., Sherman, M. G., and Smith,
R. D. (1994) Theoretical investigations of frequency shifts caused by
analytical problems. High dynamic range of detection within a electrostatic trapping field inhomogeneities in ion cyclotron resonance
spectrum together with the ability to measure accurately the mass spectrometry. Proc. 42nd Amer. Soc. Mass Spectrom. Conf. on
frequencies (and hence masses) even at levels of a few ions Mass Spectrom. & Allied Topics, pp 729, Amer. Soc. Mass Spectrom.,
Chicago, IL
makes FTMS instruments very useful for chromatographic 12. Marshall, A. G., Hendrickson, C. L., and Jackson, G. S. (1998) Fourier
applications. Recent developments in Orbitrap commercial transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry: a primer. Mass
instrumentation have yielded benchtop mass spectrometers Spectrom. Rev. 17, 1–35
13. Comisarow, M. B., and Marshall, A. G. (1974) Frequency-sweep Fourier
which can measure wide mass range spectra at high resolu- transform ion cyclotron resonance spectroscopy. Chem. Phys. Lett. 26,
tion and with minimum supervision. 489 – 490
Increasing frequency of oscillations will enhance perform- 14. Marshall, A. G., and Roe, D. C. (1980) Theory of Fourier transform ion
cyclotron resonance mass spectroscopy: Response to frequency-sweep
ance of both FTMS instruments. Progress is thus expected in excitation. J. Chem. Phys. 73, 1581–1590
the direction of higher field magnets for FTICR, and similarly, 15. Guan, S., and Marshall, A. G. (1996) Stored waveform inverse Fourier
stronger electrical fields and/or smaller geometrical size for transform (SWIFT) ion excitation in trapped-ion mass spectrometry: The-
ory and applications. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Proc. 157–158, 5–37
the Orbitrap analyzer. Considering that the Orbitrap technol- 16. O’Connor, P. B., and McLafferty, F. W. (1995) High-resolution ion isolation
ogy is still in its “infancy,” much more is expected from its with the ion cyclotron resonance capacitively coupled open cell. J. Am.
protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol 26, 1367–1372 63. Bondarenko, P. V., Second, T. P., Zabrouskov, V., Makarov, A. A., and
59. Dernovics, M., and Lobinski, R. (2008) Speciation analysis of selenium Zhang, Z. (2009) Mass measurement and top-down HPLC/MS analysis
metabolites in yeast-based food supplements by ICPMS assisted hydro- of intact monoclonal antibodies on a hybrid linear quadrupole ion trap-
philic interaction HPLC hybrid linear ion trap/Orbitrap MSn. Anal. Chem. Orbitrap mass spectrometer. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 20,
80, 3975–3984 1415–1424
60. Erve, J. C., DeMaio, W., and Talaat, R. E. (2008) Rapid metabolite identifi- 64. Kaufmann, R., Kirsch, D., Rood, H. A., and Spengler, B. (1992) Secondary-
cation with sub parts-per-million mass accuracy from biological matrices ion generation from large keV molecular primary ions incident on a
by direct infusion nanoelectrospray ionization after clean-up on a ZipTip stainless-steel dynode. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 6, 98 –104
and LTQ/Orbitrap mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 65. Makarov, A., Denisov, E., and Lange, O. (2009) Performance evaluation of
22, 3015–3026 a high-field Orbitrap mass analyzer. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 20,
61. Scherl, A., Shaffer, S. A., Taylor, G. K., Hernandez, P., Appel, R. D., Binz, 1391–1396
P. A., and Goodlett, D. R. (2008) On the benefits of acquiring peptide 66. Beu, S. C., Blakney, G. T., Quinn, J. P., Hendrickson, C. L., and Marshall,
fragment ions at high measured mass accuracy. J. Am. Soc. Mass A. G. (2004) Broadband phase correction of FT-ICR mass spectra via
Spectrom. 19, 891–901 simultaneous excitation and detection. Anal. Chem. 76, 5756 –5761
62. Lange, O., Makarov, A., Balschun, W., and Denisov, E. (2010) Accelerating 67. Xian, F., Hendrickson, C. L., Blakney, G. T., Beu, S. C., and Marshall, A. G.
spectral acquisition rate of Orbitrap mass spectrometry. 58th ASMS Conf. (2010) Automated broadband phase correction of Fourier transform ion
on Mass Spectrom. & Allied Topics, May 23–27, Salt Lake City, Utah cyclotron resonance mass spectra. Anal. Chem. 82, 8807– 8812