Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2K views

    A Broad Cross-Section of Professional Peers."

    Uploaded by

    Ann
    The document discusses two ethical scenarios. In scenario 1, a charity auction held in the office was deemed ethical by the professional ethics model since it had support from other employees. Scenario 2 examines misleading the public for a good cause where repairing a police station now provides tangible immediate benefits, but could damage trust in the future, making the downside deferred.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    A Broad Cross-Section of Professional Peers."

    Uploaded by

    Ann
    2K views1 page
    The document discusses two ethical scenarios. In scenario 1, a charity auction held in the office was deemed ethical by the professional ethics model since it had support from other employees. Scenario 2 examines misleading the public for a good cause where repairing a police station now provides tangible immediate benefits, but could damage trust in the future, making the downside deferred.

    Original Title

    BM1708 Activity

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document discusses two ethical scenarios. In scenario 1, a charity auction held in the office was deemed ethical by the professional ethics model since it had support from other employees. Scenario 2 examines misleading the public for a good cause where repairing a police station now provides tangible immediate benefits, but could damage trust in the future, making the downside deferred.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    2K views1 page

    A Broad Cross-Section of Professional Peers."

    Uploaded by

    Ann
    The document discusses two ethical scenarios. In scenario 1, a charity auction held in the office was deemed ethical by the professional ethics model since it had support from other employees. Scenario 2 examines misleading the public for a good cause where repairing a police station now provides tangible immediate benefits, but could damage trust in the future, making the downside deferred.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    A.

    Scenario 1 - Holding Charity Auctions in the Office


    - Based on the given scenario, the most appropriate ethical decision model that can be applied to
    Angela’s situation is the Professional Ethics Model since other bank employees (Roland, Joven, Janeth)
    expressed their support to the auction and convinced Justin to give permission showing “the approval of
    a broad cross-section of professional peers.”

    B. Scenario 2 - Misleading for Good Purpose


    - The disparity between the belief and and behavior in Vince’s situation is tangible or intangible,
    immediate or deferred. In the case of Vince, if he is willing to do what his boss ordered, there will be a
    direct benefit that is both intermediate and tangible. The police station will have a huge amount of
    money for repair and renovation. The downside is that maybe at some point in the future, people are
    going to find out about this and lose the trust of the people and the government. The benefit in this
    situation is immediate; the downside is deferred.

    You might also like