0% found this document useful (0 votes)
58 views4 pages

Purpose: Determine Best Practice For Store Separation

The document summarizes an AIAC workshop that aimed to determine best practices for store separation testing. The workshop sought to: 1) Compare results from different users applying single degree of freedom codes to the same wind tunnel data 2) Identify improvements to wind tunnel testing of cavities 3) Share experiences on common mistakes made in store separation testing Generic cavity wind tunnel data and initial conditions were provided for participants to run simulations and compare outputs.

Uploaded by

wajahat
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
58 views4 pages

Purpose: Determine Best Practice For Store Separation

The document summarizes an AIAC workshop that aimed to determine best practices for store separation testing. The workshop sought to: 1) Compare results from different users applying single degree of freedom codes to the same wind tunnel data 2) Identify improvements to wind tunnel testing of cavities 3) Share experiences on common mistakes made in store separation testing Generic cavity wind tunnel data and initial conditions were provided for participants to run simulations and compare outputs.

Uploaded by

wajahat
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

AIAC Store Separation Workshop Ankara Turkey Sept 20-22, 2017

Purpose: Determine Best Practice for Store Separation


1. CTS wind tunnel testing is useless for determining safe separation
a) flight tests occur at different conditions
b) ejector forces are different in flight
c) mass properties may be different and should be measured
d) aero coefficients are different – parametric variations
2. Why do we do use CTS?
a) determine proper size and scope of grid test
b) validate grid size
c) reduce size of grid test
d) make sure your pre-test predictions make sense
3. Purpose of the workshop
a) See if different users of SDoF code get the same answers
b) Compare SDoF codes using the same wind tunnel freestream and grid data
c) Determine how wind tunnel testing for cavities could be improved
d) Determine ejector forces
d) Most important mistakes made – share experience

How Will the Worship Work?


1. Comparisons shared with all participants by 14 Sep 2016.
2. Upload final paper by 21 Sept 2017
Generic cavity wind tunnel data provided [1,2,3,4]. Given:
1. MK-82 freestream Data
2. MK-82 grid data cavity
3. MK-82 mass properties and geometry (Appendix A)
4, Cavity Dimensions length = 15.73’ width = 4.33’ depth = 2.925’ feet full scale (L/D=5.38)
5. Given initial conditions M = 0.85, Alpha = 0.0 Altitude = 0.0
Cavity origin located at upper right-hand corner X = Y = Z = 0 store at XFS = -11.0, YBL = -0.6, ZWL = 0.53
a) X = 0, Y = 0, Z =0. 53 U = 0, V = 0, W = 0 FPS, P=0, Q = 0. R = 0 deg/sec
b) X = 0, Y = 0, Z =0. 53 U = 0, V = 0, W = 30 FPS, P=0, Q = -40 deg/sec, R = 0
c) X = 0, Y = 0, Z = 0.53 U = 0, V = 0, W = 0, nominal ejector profile, find minimal ejector force

XFS = -11.0, YBL = -0.6, ZWL = 0.53 X= 0, Y=0, Z = 0

D = 2.925’ depth = 2.925

width = 4.33”
W = 4.33’
length = 15.73’

Dimensions

1
Refernces:
1. Dix, R.E., and Bauer, R. C., “and Grubbs, M. A., “Store Loads, Static and Fluctuating Pressures, and
Separation Trajectories Near a Generic Cavity’” AEDC-TMR-87-P9, Dec. 1987.
2. Desmelik, M. J., “Separation Characteristics of the MK-82 LDGP Bomb from a Generic Weapons Bay,”
AEDC-TSR-88-P-14, June 1988.
3. Cenko, A., et. al., "Influence Function Method Applications to Cavity Flowfield Predictions,” AIAA
Paper 89-0477, Jan. 1989.
4. Finney, L., and Hallberg, E., "An Investigation of Cavity Flow Effects on a Store In the Vicinity of the
Shear Layer, " ITEA Aircraft Stores Compatibility Symposium, April 2010.

Figure 1 Geometry for MK-82 store (also available on the internet)

Appendix A Store Mass Properties 500# Store


MK-82
WT0 = 550.00 Store Weight (lb)
SREF = 0.63 Reference Area ft2
LREF = 0.896 Reference Length ft
XCG0 = 3.48 Axial distance from nose-to-CG (ft)
IXX0 = 1.5 (slug-ft2)
IYY0 = 37.8 (slug-ft2)
IZZ0 = 37.8 (slug-ft2)
PSI0 = 0.0 Carriage Initial Yaw (deg)
THETA0 = 0.0 Carriage Initial Pitch (deg)
PHI0 = 0.0 Carriage Initial Roll (deg)
XFFE = 2.65 ft. Axial distance from store nose to forward ejector piston (ft)
DXFE = 1.667 ft.

2
Appendix B Nomenclature
Store Body Axis System Definitions

CA
CN

CLM
X CFD Z CFD
YB

CY CLN CLL

YCFD
ZB S S
XB

Freestream
Origin: Always coincident with the store center of gravity at. The axes
rotate with the store in pitch, yaw, and roll.

XB = Parallel to the store longitudinal axis, positive direction is


upstream at store release.

YB = Perpendicular to the XB and ZB directions, positive right looking


upstream when the store is at zero yaw and roll.

ZB = Perpendicular to the XB direction and parallel to the aircraft


plane of symmetry when the store and aircraft are at zero yaw and
roll, positive down when the store is at zero yaw and roll.

Cl = CLL = Rolling moment coefficient, positive right wing down.

Cm = CLM = Pitching moment coefficient, positive nose up.

Cn = CLN = Yawing moment coefficient, positive nose right.

CN = CN = Normal force coefficient, positive up.

CY = CY = Side force coefficient, positive right, looking forward along store


centerline.

CA = CA = Axial force coefficient, positive aft along the store centerline.

P, Q, R = Store roll, pitch and yaw rates positive right wing up, nose up
and nose right, deg/sec.

3
U, V, W = Store component velocities, positive in the positive XB, YB, and
ZB directions, inches/sec.

S = ALPHAS = Store Angle of Attack positive nose up as seen by the pilot, deg.

S = BETAS = Store Sideslip angle positive nose left as seen by the pilot, deg.

Store Trajectory Axis System Y

X
Z

Origin: Coincident with the store center of gravity at release. The origin is
fixed with respect to the aircraft and thus translates along the
current flight path at the freestream velocity. The axes rotate to
maintain constant angular orientation with respect to the current
flight path direction.

X = Parallel to the aircraft longitudinal axis at store release, positive


forward as seen by the pilot (ft).

Y = Perpendicular to the X direction and parallel to the X-Y plane,


positive to the right as seen by the pilot (ft).

Z = Perpendicular to the X and Y directions, positive down as seen by


the pilot (ft).

XFS = Store center of gravity in Aircraft coordinate axis, positive


forward as seen by the pilot (ft).

YFS = Store center of gravity in Aircraft coordinate axis, positive to the


right as seen by the pilot (ft).

ZFS = Store center of gravity in Aircraft coordinate axis, positive down


as seen by the pilot (ft).

XFE = Axial distance from store nose to forward ejector piston (ft)

DXAE = 1.667 = Axial distance between forward and aft ejector pistons (ft)

 = PSI = Angle between the projection of the store longitudinal body axis
in the X-Y plane and the X axis, positive when the store nose is to
the right as seen by the pilot, deg. (Note opposite sign to S )

 = THE = Angle between the store longitudinal body axis and its projection
in the X-Y plane, positive nose up as seen by the pilot, deg.
 = PHI = Angle between the store lateral body axis and the intersection of
the store Y-Z and X-Y planes, positive for clockwise rotation, deg

You might also like