A.1070 (28) - Code For Implementation of IMO Instruments PDF
A.1070 (28) - Code For Implementation of IMO Instruments PDF
Resolution A.1070(28)
(adopted on 4 December 2013)
THE ASSEMBLY,
RECALLING ALSO that, through resolution A.1018(26), it approved the time frame and
schedule of activities for the consideration and introduction of an institutionalized IMO Member
State Audit Scheme,
RECALLING ALSO that, by resolution A.1054(27), it adopted the Code for the Implementation
of Mandatory IMO Instruments, 2011, which provides guidance for the implementation and
enforcement of IMO instruments and forms the basis of the Voluntary IMO Member State Audit
Scheme, in particular concerning the identification of the auditable areas,
BEING AWARE of the request of the seventh session of the United Nations Commission on
Sustainable Development (CSD 7) that measures be developed to ensure that flag States
give full and complete effect to the IMO and other relevant conventions to which they are
party, so that the ships of all flag States meet international rules and standards,
RECOGNIZING that parties to the relevant international conventions have, as part of the
ratification process, accepted to fully meet their responsibilities and to discharge their
obligations under the conventions and other instruments to which they are party,
REAFFIRMING that States have the primary responsibility to have in place an adequate and
effective system to exercise control over ships entitled to fly their flag, and to ensure that they
comply with relevant international rules and regulations in respect of maritime safety, security
and protection of the marine environment,
REAFFIRMING ALSO that States, in their capacity as port and coastal States, have other
obligations and responsibilities under applicable international law in respect of maritime
safety, security and protection of the marine environment,
NOTING that, while States may realize certain benefits by becoming party to instruments
aiming at promoting maritime safety, security and the prevention of pollution from ships,
these benefits can only be fully realized when all parties carry out their obligations as
required by the instruments concerned,
NOTING ALSO that the ultimate effectiveness of any instrument depends, inter alia, upon all
States:
(a) becoming party to all instruments related to maritime safety, security and
pollution prevention and control;
(b) implementing and enforcing such instruments fully and effectively; and
-2-
BEING DESIROUS to further assist Member Governments to improve their capabilities and
overall performance in order to be able to comply with the IMO instruments to which they are
party,
CONSCIOUS of the difficulties some Member States may face in complying fully with all the
provisions of the various IMO instruments to which they are party,
MINDFUL of the need for any such difficulties to be eliminated to the extent possible; and
recalling that the Organization has established an Integrated Technical Cooperation
Programme for that reason and purpose,
NOTING FURTHER that the Maritime Safety Committee and the Marine Environment
Protection Committee have developed requirements for adoption by Contracting
Governments to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, the Protocol
of 1988 relating to the International Convention on Load Lines, 1966, the International
Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as modified by the Protocol of
1978 relating thereto, the Protocol of 1997 to amend the International Convention for the
Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as modified by the Protocol of 1978 relating
thereto, and the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and
Watchkeeping, 1978, respectively, which will make the use of the Code referred to in
operative paragraph 1 mandatory,
1. ADOPTS the IMO Instruments Implementation Code (III Code), set out in the annex
to the present resolution;
2. REQUESTS the Maritime Safety Committee and the Marine Environment Protection
Committee to keep the Code under review and, in coordination with the Council, to propose
amendments thereto to the Assembly; and
-3-
Annex
Table of Contents
-4-
Objective
1 The objective of this Code is to enhance global maritime safety and protection of the
marine environment and assist States in the implementation of instruments of the
Organization.
2 Different States will view this Code according to their own circumstances and should
be bound only for the implementation of those instruments to which they are Contracting
Governments or Parties. By virtue of geography and circumstance, some States may have a
greater role as a flag State than as a port State or as a coastal State, whilst others may have
a greater role as a coastal State or a port State than as a flag State.
Strategy
.3 continuously review the strategy to achieve, maintain and improve the overall
organizational performance and capability as a flag, port and coastal State.
General
4 Under the general provisions of treaty law and of IMO conventions, States should be
responsible for promulgating laws and regulations and for taking all other steps which may
be necessary to give those instruments full and complete effect so as to ensure safety of life
at sea and protection of the marine environment.
Scope
6 The Code seeks to address those aspects necessary for a Contracting Government
or Party to give full and complete effect to the provisions of the applicable international
instruments to which it is a Contracting Government or Party, pertaining to:
.4 load lines;
Resolution A.1070(28) (adopted on 4 December 2013)
IMO INSTRUMENTS IMPLEMENTATION CODE (III CODE)
-5-
.1 jurisdiction;
.5 enforcement arrangements;
Initial actions
8 When a new or amended instrument of the Organization enters into force for a
State, the Government of that State should be in a position to implement and enforce its
provisions through appropriate national legislation and to provide the necessary
implementation and enforcement infrastructure. This means that the Government of the
State should have:
.1 the ability to promulgate laws, which permit effective jurisdiction and control
in administrative, technical and social matters over ships flying its flag and,
in particular, provide the legal basis for general requirements for registries,
the inspection of ships, safety and pollution prevention laws applying to
such ships and the making of associated regulations;
.2 a legal basis for the enforcement of its national laws and regulations
including the associated investigative and penal processes; and
Communication of information
-6-
Records
Improvement
11 States should continually improve the adequacy of the measures which are taken to
give effect to those conventions and protocols which they have accepted. Improvement
should be made through rigorous and effective application and enforcement of national
legislation, as appropriate, and monitoring of compliance.
12 The State should stimulate a culture which provides opportunities for improvement
of performance in maritime safety and environmental protection activities, which may include,
inter alia:
13 Further, the State should take action to identify and eliminate the cause of any
non-conformities in order to prevent recurrence, including:
14 The State should determine action needed to eliminate the causes of potential
non-conformities in order to prevent their occurrence.
Implementation
15 In order to effectively discharge their responsibilities and obligations, flag States should:
-7-
17 A flag State should ensure that ships entitled to fly its flag are sufficiently and
efficiently manned, taking into account relevant and existing measures such as the Principles
of Safe Manning adopted by the Organization.
Resolution A.1070(28) (adopted on 4 December 2013)
IMO INSTRUMENTS IMPLEMENTATION CODE (III CODE)
-8-
Delegation of authority
18 With regard only to ships entitled to fly its flag a flag State authorizing a recognized
organization to act on its behalf, in conducting the surveys, inspections and audits, issuing of
certificates and documents, marking of ships and other statutory work required under the
conventions of the Organization or under its national legislation, should regulate such
authorization(s) in accordance with the applicable requirements of the international mandatory
instruments to:
.5 require that the recognized organization maintain records, which will provide
the Administration with data to assist in interpretation of requirements
contained in the applicable international instruments.
19 No flag State should mandate its recognized organizations to apply to ships, other
than those entitled to fly its flag, any requirement pertaining to their classification rules,
requirements, procedures or performance of other statutory certification processes, beyond
convention requirements and the mandatory instruments of the Organization.
-9-
.3 providing staff who have a good knowledge of the rules and regulations of
the flag State and those of the recognized organizations and who are
available to carry out effective oversight of the recognized organizations.
21 A flag State nominating surveyor(s) for the purpose of carrying out surveys, audits
and inspections on its behalf should regulate such nominations, as appropriate, in
accordance with the guidance provided in paragraph 18, in particular subparagraphs .3 and .4.
Enforcement
.1 prohibiting ships entitled to fly its flag from sailing until such ships can
proceed to sea in compliance with the requirements of international rules
and standards;
.2 the periodic inspection of ships entitled to fly its flag to verify that the actual
condition of the ship and its crew is in conformity with the certificates it
carries;
- 10 -
23 A flag State should develop and implement a control and monitoring programme,
as appropriate, in order to:
.2 provide for the collection of statistical data, so that trend analyses can be
conducted to identify problem areas; and
.5 ensure the training and oversight of the activities of flag State surveyors
and investigators.
25 When a flag State is informed that a ship entitled to fly its flag has been detained by
a port State, the flag State should oversee that appropriate corrective measures are taken to
bring the ship in question into immediate compliance with the applicable international
instruments.
26 A flag State, or a recognized organization acting on its behalf, should only issue or
endorse an international certificate to a ship after it has determined that the ship meets all
applicable requirements.
28 The flag State should define and document the responsibilities, authority and
interrelation of all personnel who manage, perform and verify work relating to and affecting
safety and pollution prevention.
- 11 -
30 Personnel qualified under paragraph 29.1 should have served for a period of not
less than three years at sea as an officer in the deck or engine department.
31 Personnel qualified under paragraph 29.2 should have worked in a relevant capacity
for at least three years.
33 Other personnel assisting in the performance of such work should have education,
training and supervision commensurate with the tasks they are authorized to perform.
35 The flag State should implement a documented system for qualification of personnel
and continuous updating of their knowledge as appropriate to the tasks they are authorized
to undertake.
.6 full safety awareness in all circumstances, also for one's own safety; and
Resolution A.1070(28) (adopted on 4 December 2013)
IMO INSTRUMENTS IMPLEMENTATION CODE (III CODE)
- 12 -
37 The flag State should issue an identification document for the surveyor to carry
when performing his/her tasks.
39 The flag State is recommended to ensure that individual investigators have working
knowledge and practical experience in those subject areas pertaining to their normal duties.
Additionally, in order to assist individual investigators in performing duties outside their
normal assignments, the flag State is recommended to ensure ready access to expertise in
the following areas, as necessary:
.4 interviewing techniques;
41 Ship casualties should be investigated and reported in accordance with the relevant
international instruments, taking into account the Casualty Investigation Code, as may be
amended, and guidelines developed by the Organization. The report on the investigation
should be forwarded to the Organization together with the flag State's observations, in
accordance with the guidelines referred to above.
42 A flag State should, on a periodic basis, evaluate its performance with respect to the
implementation of administrative processes, procedures and resources necessary to meet its
obligations as required by the international instruments to which it is a party.
43 Measures to evaluate the performance of flag States should include, inter alia, port
State control detention rates, flag State inspection results, casualty statistics, communication
and information processes, annual loss statistics (excluding constructive total losses (CTLs))
and other performance indicators as may be appropriate, in order to determine whether
staffing, resources and administrative procedures are adequate to meet its flag State
obligations.
Resolution A.1070(28) (adopted on 4 December 2013)
IMO INSTRUMENTS IMPLEMENTATION CODE (III CODE)
- 13 -
.1 fleet loss and accident ratios to identify trends over selected time periods;
.2 the number of verified cases of detained ships in relation to the size of the
fleet;
.5 investigations into very serious and serious casualties and lessons learned
from them;
.9 the number of incidents and violations that occur under the applicable
international maritime pollution prevention regulations; and
Implementation
45 Coastal States have certain rights and obligations under various international
instruments. When exercising their rights under those instruments coastal States incur
additional obligations.
47 A coastal State should ensure that its legislation, guidance and procedures are
established for the consistent implementation and verification of its rights, obligations and
responsibilities contained in the relevant international instruments to which it is a party.
.1 radiocommunication services;
- 14 -
.4 hydrographic services;
.5 ships' routeing;
.8 aids to navigation.
Enforcement
49 Coastal States should take all necessary measures to ensure their observance of
international rules when exercising their rights and fulfilling their obligations.
50 A coastal State should consider, develop and implement a control and monitoring
programme, as appropriate, in order to:
.1 provide for the allocation of statistical data so that trend analyses can be
conducted to identify problem areas;
52 Port States have certain rights and obligations under various international
instruments. When exercising their rights under those instruments, port States incur additional
obligations.
53 Port States can play an integral role in the achievement of maritime safety and
environmental protection, including pollution prevention. The role and responsibilities of the
port State with respect to maritime safety and environmental protection is derived from a
combination of international treaties, conventions and national laws as well as, in some
instances, from bilateral and multilateral agreements.
- 15 -
55 A port State should ensure that its legislation, guidance and procedures are
established for the consistent implementation and verification of its rights, obligations and
responsibilities contained in the relevant international instruments to which it is a party.
Enforcement
57 Port States should take all necessary measures to ensure their observance of
international rules when exercising their rights and fulfilling their obligations.
59 Also, a number of those instruments obligate port States to treat non-parties to those
conventions no more favourably than those that are parties. This means that port States
should impose the conditions of those instruments on parties, as well as on non-parties.
60 When exercising its right to carry out port State control, a port State should establish
processes to administer a port State control programme consistent with the relevant
resolution adopted by the Organization7.
61 Port State control should be carried out only by authorized and qualified port State
control officers in accordance with the relevant procedures adopted by the Organization.
62 Port State control officers and persons assisting them should be free from any
commercial, financial, and other pressures and have no commercial interest, either in the
port of inspection or in the ships inspected, in ship repair facilities or in any support services
in the port or elsewhere, nor should the port State control officers be employed by or
undertake work on behalf of recognized organizations or classification societies. Further
procedures should be implemented to ensure that persons or organizations external to the
port State cannot influence the results of port State inspection and control carried out.
63 A port State should periodically evaluate its performance in respect of exercising its
rights and meeting its obligations under the applicable instruments of the Organization.
Resolution A.1070(28) (adopted on 4 December 2013)
IMO INSTRUMENTS IMPLEMENTATION CODE (III CODE)