Vol. I - Main Report PDF
Vol. I - Main Report PDF
Vol. I - Main Report PDF
1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Section 3
Km 65+923 to Km 80+930
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Contents
CONTENTS
VOLUME-I
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Contents
2.1 General
2.2 Terminal Points including Important Cardinal Points
2.3 GPS Co-ordinates
2.4 Status of Existing km Stones
2.5 Important Settlements along the Project Road
2.6 Connectivity
2.7 Terrain and Land Use
2.8 Existing Right of Way (ROW)
2.9 Existing Cross Sectional Elements
2.10 Geometry
2.11 Pavement
2.12 Road Intersections/Cross Roads
2.13 ROB/Railway Level Crossing
2.14 Bridges and Culverts
2.15 Other Facilities
2.16 Existing Utilities
2.17 Project Road Deficiencies
2.18 Critical Areas Needing Attention
2.19 Field Photographs
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Project Influence Area
3.3 The State of Assam at a Glance
3.4 District Profile :Hojai
3.4.1 Climate
3.4.2 Demography
3.4.3 Working Profile
3.4.4 Economy
3.5 District Profile :East KarbiAnglong
3.5.1 Climate
3.5.2 Demography
3.5.3 Economy
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Contents
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Reconnaissance Survey
4.3 Road Inventory
4.4 Pavement Condition Survey
4.5 Inventory and Condition Survey of Existing Bridges, Culverts and Other Structures
4.6 Alternative Alignment Study of Major Realignments
4.7 Topographical Survey
4.8 Traffic Survey
4.9 Axle Load Survey
4.10 Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD)Survey
4.10.1 TOR Requirements
4.10.2 Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD)
4.10.3 Data Verification
4.10.4 Identification of Homogeneous Sub-sections
4.10.5 Work Procedure
4.11 Roughness Survey
4.12 Subgrade Investigation
4.12.1 Sub-grade Investigation Methodology (Test Pits)
4.12.2 Large Pits (1.0m x 1.0m x 1.0m)
4.12.3 Existing Pavement Composition
4.12.4 Laboratory Properties of Sub Grade Soil
4.12.5 Grain Size
4.12.6 Atterberg Limit
4.12.7 Moisture Content vs. Dry Unit Weight Relationship (Heavy Compaction)
4.12.8 CBR of Existing Sub Grade Soil
4.12.9 Field Dry Density
4.12.10 Laboratory Properties of Sub-Grade Soil
4.13 Material Investigation
4.13.1 Borrow Area Material Survey
4.13.2 Quarry Material Survey
4.13.3 Manufactured Materials
4.14 Lead Charts
4.15 Hydrological and Hydraulic Study
4.16 Secondary Data Collection
5.1 Introduction
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Contents
6.1 General
6.2 Geometric Improvement
6.2.1 Codes and Guidelines
6.2.2 Design Concept
6.2.3 Geometric Design Standards
6.2.4 Widening Proposal
6.2.5 Cross-section for Improved Facility
6.2.6 Cross-section for Bridges, Culverts and Other Structures
6.2.7 Horizontal Alignment
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Contents
7.1 Introduction
7.1.1 Scope of Environmental Screening
7.2 Methodology and Work Plan
7.2.1 Approach to Screening and Scoping
7.2.2 Project Work Plan
7.3 Project Description
7.3.1 Widening Proposal
7.3.2 Geometric Design Standards
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Contents
8.1 Introduction
8.2 Social Screening
8.3 Existing Road Width
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Contents
9.1 General
9.2 Methodology
9.2.1 Estimation of Quantities
9.2.2 Unit Rates of Civil Works
9.2.3 Civil Cost and TPC
9.2.4 Other Costs
10.1 Introduction
10.2 Measures of Project Analysis
10.3 Decision Criteria
10.4 Price Elasticity of Demand and Traffic Forecasting
10.5 Road User Costs (RUC) Components
10.6 Inputs to the HDM-4 Model
10.7 Capital Cost of the Project
10.8 Routine and Periodic Maintenance Cost
10.9 Project Benefits
10.10 Economic Viability
10.11 Sensitivity Analysis
10.12 Conclusions
11.1 Background
11.2 Approach to Financial Evaluation
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Contents
12.1 Introduction
12.2 Stages of Road Safety Audit (RSA)
12.3 Aspects to be Checked
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Executive Summary
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The National Highways & Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited has been constituted
through an Act of Parliament for faster, economical and quality Road Construction work
throughout India. The National Highways & Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited
(NHIDCL) has been entrusted with the assignment of preparation of DPR for development of
Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors and Feeder Routes to improve the efficiency of freight
movement in India under BharatmalaPariyojana.
In view of the above work NHIDCL has appointed M/s Voyants Solutions Pvt. Ltd. to carry out
the Feasibility Studies and Detailed Project Report including field investigations, road inventory,
structure inventory, FWD test, road crust sample (trial pits), material investigation, secondary
data collection and traffic survey (classified traffic volume count, O-D, intersection counts, axle
load survey, animal/pedestrian crossing counts and speed-delay survey). The letter of invitation
(LOI) has been issued vide memo no. NHIDCL/Bharatmala/DPR/Phase-I /Lot-1/2017, dated
October 30, 2017, whereas, the letter of acceptance (LOA) has been issued vide letter no.
NHIDCL/Bharatmala/DPR/Phase-I /Lot-1/Package II/2017/27, dated February 02, 2018. Letter of
commencement (LOC) for the consultancy services was issued vide letter no.
NHIDCL/Bharatmala/DPR/Phase-I /Lot-1/Package II/2017/80, dated April 13, 2018.
The project road comprises 5 stretches as mentioned in the RFP as mentioned below in Table
0.1.
Table 0.1 : Details of Major Road Segments
Stretches Description
Strech-1 Daboka – Manja (NH-29)
Strech-2 Manja- Lahorijan (NH-29)
Strech-3 Lahorijan – Khatkhati (NH-129)
Strech-4 Numaligar- Khatkhati (NH 129)
Strech-5 Khatkhati – Chumukademia (Dimapur Bypass)
Project location on state and district maps are presented on Figure 1.1 and 1.2 respectively.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Executive Summary
This report includes the road section as mentioned below from the Stretch -1 and 2 in the above
table:
Section-3: From Km 65+923 (near Dokmoka)to Km 80+930 (near Loring Thepi Village)
The salient features of the existing project road are given in Table 0.2.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Executive Summary
Details
Sl No. Items Stretch I: Daboka to Lahorijan
(NH 29)
1 Length as per RFP 128.8 KM
2 Districts Enroute Hojai, KarbiAnglong
3 Important Settlements Haludihadi, Langpi, Dokmoka, Langhin, Pholoni, Uttarbarbil, Bokalia, Manja, Dilai
4 Terrain 62% Plain, 38% Rolling
5 Landuse Agricultural-48%, Open/Barren-7%, Forest-28%, Residential/Commercial-17%
6 National Park Nil
7 Existing ROW 18m – 45m (as measured at site)
8 Forest Stretches Around 33km (Daboka RF, Sildharampur RF, Longhit RF)
9 Present Road Condition Fair to Poor (2-Lane c/w)
10 Bypass/Realignment to be Involved Around 37%
11 Built Up Stretches About 28km
12 Carriageway Width 6.0m – 10.0m
13 Average Journey Speed 40-50kmph,
14 Requirement of Bypasses At Dokmoka, Bokalia and Manja
15 Horizontal Geometry Fair-Good (In Rolling terrain, Poor-Fair)
16 Vertical Geometry A few curves with inadequate sight distance mainly near Bridge Approaches, otherwise good
17 No. of Existing Structures 248 (MJB-2, MNB-42, Culvert-204)
18 No. of Level Crossings Nil
19 No. of Intersections Major-9, Minor-71
20 Roadside Trees Approx. 6,000
21 Major Rivers Jamuna and Shiloni
22 Water Logging Area -
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Executive Summary
Details
Sl No. Items Stretch I: Daboka to Lahorijan
(NH 29)
23 Roadside Utility HT/LT lines, OFCs, transmission towers, tube wells, wells
24 Road Safety Sub-standard and Negligible
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Executive Summary
0.4 Traffic
The summary of Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) is shown in Table 0.3.
The projected combined traffic on the project road sections from start of Dabokato Manjais
presented in Table 0.4.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Executive Summary
The following engineering survey and investigations were conducted at this stage of project
preparation:
a) Reconnaissance Survey: to assess the quality and quantity of features along the alignment,
the data was used to finalize the most preferred alignment.
b) Road Inventory: to assess the characteristics of existing road, this was used to finalize plan
and profile drawings as well as extent of widening required.
c) Road Condition Survey: to assess condition of existing pavement, the data has helped to
assess the usability of existing pavement along with extent of repair work needed.
d) Inventory and Condition Survey of Existing Bridges, Culverts and Other Structures: to check
the dimensions and conditions of existing structures, the information obtained has guided
to finalize the improvement proposals of existing structures.
e) Topographic Survey: to exactly identify locations of all existing features along the alignment,
this survey will dictate the final plan & profile drawings, BOQ etc. This survey will be
conducted at the next stage of project preparation.
f) Traffic Survey: To assess possible traffic intensity along the proposed road along with its
future projection, this survey is the basic of the entire study. The data has been used to
finalize lane configuration, tolling strategy and the viability of the project.
g) Axle Load Survey: to assess possible loading over proposed pavement. The data was used to
determine the VDF which ultimately guided the pavement design.
h) FWD Survey: to assess the existing pavement composition from deflection point of view, the
data was used to finalize overlay thickness. As the road sections are under construction, the
survey could not be conducted for these stretches.
i) Pavement Investigation: to assess characteristics of existing pavement, the data was used
for pavement design.
j) Material Investigation: to assess possible sources of construction materials and their
suitability, distance of sources from project road was used to calculate the lead distance
which is ultimately used for rate analysis.
The salient proposals for up-gradation and improvement of the project road are classified into
the following engineering aspects:
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Executive Summary
In general, in this section of proposed stretch follows existing Daboka – Lahorijan Road (NH
29).
Widening of the project road based on traffic capacity/requirement.
Improving the horizontal geometry of the existing road based on the design standards as per
IRC: SP: 84-2019
Design of new pavement for widening and realignment of the existing road.
Provision of overlay at strengthening stretches.
Improvement of all major and minor intersections.
Rehabilitation and widening of the existing structures including bridges, culverts etc. and
design of new ones as per requirement.
Provision of new structures including bridges, culverts, underpasses etc.
Provision of comprehensive road furniture for complete road safety measures.
Provision of protective measures on high embankment slopes.
Mitigation measures for environmental and social issues w.r.t.to screening report.
The general design standards for improvement are enumerated in Table 0.5.
Table 0.5 : Geometric Design Standards for Road Works (Plain/Rolling Terrain)
Sl No. Attributes Geometric Design Standards
Design Speed
Plain and Rolling Terrain
1 Ruling: 100 kmph
(Cross slope of the ground upto 25 per
Minimum: 80 kmph
cent)
For four lane: 2 x 7.0m with 0.5 m Kerb
2 Carriageway Width
shyness at either side
Width of Shoulder
3 a) Paved Shoulder 2 x 2.5 m
b) Earthen Shoulder 1.5 m
4 Footpath width at built-up areas 2 x 1.5 m drain cum footpath
Camber
5 a) Carriageway 2.5%
b) Shoulder 3.0%
Maximum limited to 7.0% (for Radius
6 Maximum and Minimum Super-elevation
less than Desirable minimum)
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Executive Summary
Total 9 nos. typical cross sections are envisaged for the project as mentioned below:
TYPE –1 TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF 4-LANE DIVIDED CARRIAGEWAY WITH 1.5M WIDE
RAISED MEDIAN IN RURAL AREA (CONCENTRIC WIDENING)
TYPE –1A TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF 4-LANE DIVIDED CARRIAGEWAY WITH 1.5M WIDE
RAISED MEDIAN IN BYPASS/REALIGNMENT STRETCHES
TYPE –2 TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF 4-LANE DIVIDED CARRIAGEWAY WITH 1.5M WIDE
RAISED MEDIAN IN RURAL AREA (ECCENTRIC WIDENING)
TYPE –3 TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF 4-LANE DIVIDED CARRIAGEWAY WITH 1.5M WIDE
RAISED MEDIAN AND WITH SERVICE ROAD ON BOTH SIDES IN BUILT UP AREA.
Type-4 TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF 4-LANE DIVIDED CARRIAGEWAY WITH 1.5M WIDE
RAISED MEDIAN IN FOREST AREA (CONCENTRIC WIDENING).
Type-4A TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF 4-LANE DIVIDED CARRIAGEWAY WITH 1.5M WIDE
RAISED MEDIAN INFOREST AREA (ECCENCENTRIC WIDENING).
Type-5 TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF APPROACHES OF ELEPHANT UNDERPASSES (FOREST
AREA).
Type-6 TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF 4-LANE DIVIDED CARRIAGEWAY WITH 1.5M WIDE
RAISED MEDIAN IN FOREST AREA (NEW CONSTRUCTION).
Type-7 TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF 4-LANE DIVIDED CARRIAGEWAY AT GRADE
SEPARATOR APPROACHES WITH SERVICE ROAD AND RE WALL ON BOTH SIDES
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Executive Summary
Structures proposed for cross drainage purpose and safe movement of road users as
summarized in Table 0.6.
(i) Intersections:
a. Provision of 18 nos. minor intersections in Section-3
(ii) Provision of 7 nos.(both side total) in Section-3.
(iii) Provision of 2 nos. truck lay bye in Section-3.
(iv) Flexible pavement has been proposed. Proposed pavement compositions (in mm) are
stated below:
Flexible Pavement (for 20 msa) - 30 BC, 90 DBM, 250 WMM, 200 GSB, 500 SG
(v) Drains:
a. Section 3: Unlined Trapezoidal Drain of 23491m and RCC covered Drain of 6360m
proposed
(vi) Provision of traffic guidance, regulation, control and safety measures like traffic signs,
road markings, road studs, pedestrian guard rails, guardposts etc.
(vii) Provision of pedestrian facilities like footpaths, pedestrian crossings etc.
(viii) Provision of speed breakers
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Executive Summary
Various proposed ROW options were considered for accommodating codal provisions with
minimum land acquisition under this stage as mentioned below:
Environmental Protection Act, Forest Conservation Act, Wild Life Protection Act, Water
(prevention and control of pollution) Act, The Air (prevention and control of pollution) Act,
Noise Pollution Rules, EIA Notification, Fly Ash Notification, National Highway Act, Right to Fair
Compensation in Transparency in Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, E
waste management Rule, Construction & Demolition Rule, Hazardous & Other Wastes Rules,
Solid Waste Management Rules, Plastic Waste Management Rules are considered for
Environmental Assessment of the Project.
Climate
Assam has a Tropical Monsoon Rainforest Climate. The average annual rainfall is 2818mm. The
monsoon starts late in June and generally lasts up-to September. 90% of the rainfall received
from July to September.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Executive Summary
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Executive Summary
The State of Assam comprised of two valleys namely the Brahmaputra and Barak Valley and it is
situated in between 90° to 96° North Latitude and 24° to 28° East Longitude. The geographical
area of Assam is 78,438.00 Sq. Km out of which 56,194.00 Sq. Km and 22,244.00 Sq. Km fall
under the Brahmaputra and Barak Valley including 2 (Two) hill districts respectively. The flood
prone area of the state is 31,500.00 Sq Km as assessed by the Rastriya BarhAyog which is about
39.58 % of the total land area of Assam. This is about 9.40% of total flood prone area of the
whole country. The flood prone area of the country as a whole stand at about 10.2 % of the total
area of the country, but flood prone area of Assam is 39.58 % of the area of the state. It signifies
that the flood prone area of Assam is four times the national mark of the flood prone area of the
country. Records show that average annual area affected by flood is 9.31 Lakh Hectares. The
flood protected area of the state is 16500.00 Sq. Km till date.
The severity of flood problem of the state has been further aggravated by the acuteness of
erosion on both banks of river Brahmaputra and its tributaries. Study reveals that an area of
4.27 Lakh Hectare of the state has been eroded by the rivers since 1950, which is 7.40 % of area
of the state. The average annual rate of erosion is 8000.00 Ha. The world's largest river island
Majuli is also under the grip of erosion by river Brahmaputra and about 60 % of its original area
has already been engulfed by the river.
One of the most crucial and difficult works in implementing a road project is land/property
acquisition and resettlement of households thereof, particularly in towns and semi-urban areas.
Anticipating this problem, the Consultant has started identifying various social issues all along
the project road. During the field visit no ROW (Right-of-Way) pillars were observed or else road
boundaries are appreciated along the project road stretches. However, the Consultant has
collected the same details from the concerned offices.
At this junction, social issues gathered from the site are rather approximate but will help in
taking tentative decisions on various aspects related to improvement. During field visits social
issues (types of land, affected buildings etc.) are collected with an idea of proposed widening
schemes which are also generally guided by the presence of roadside utilities and
residential/commercial structures in semi-urban/urban areas.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Executive Summary
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Executive Summary
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Executive Summary
BharatmalaPriyojana
BOQ for Dokmoka to LoringThepi Village (Section-3)
(Design Chainage 65+923 to 80+930) (L=15.007 KM)
ABSTRACT OF COST
Item Bill Description Rate (Rs.) Amount(Rs)
3 Shifting of Utility Service Rs 20,84,45,527
4 Environment Cost Rs 5,40,23,800
5 Forest Diversion Cost Rs 45,24,000
M. Total Project Cost Rs 2,74,32,05,114
Total project cost per Km (in Cr.) 18.28
The project road is being developed to improve the connectivity of the surrounding area and
connectivity is the guiding factor for developing this section. The road stretches from Daboka to
Lahorijan via Dokmoka, Bakolia, and Manja will be improved manifold if the project road is
developed.
Conclusions
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Executive Summary
Recommendations
The proposed project road being developed as four lane carriageway configuration for 15.007
Km is not recommended under BOT mode.
The proposed project can, however, be considered under other options as under
EPC Construction
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 1: Introduction
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The National Highways & Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited has been constituted
through an Act of Parliament for faster, economical and quality Road Construction work
throughout India. The National Highways & Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited
(NHIDCL) has been entrusted with the assignment of preparation of DPR for development of
Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors and Feeder Routes to improve the efficiency of freight
movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana.
In view of the above work NHIDCL has appointed M/s Voyants Solutions Pvt. Ltd. to carry out
the Feasibility Studies and Detailed Project Report including field investigations, road inventory,
structure inventory, FWD test, road crust sample (trial pits), material investigation, secondary
data collection and traffic survey (classified traffic volume count, O-D, intersection counts, axle
load survey, animal/pedestrian crossing counts and speed-delay survey). The letter of invitation
(LOI) has been issued vide memo no. NHIDCL/Bharatmala/DPR/Phase-I /Lot-1/2017, dated
October 30, 2017, whereas, the letter of acceptance (LOA) has been issued vide letter no.
NHIDCL/Bharatmala/DPR/Phase-I /Lot-1/Package II/2017/27, dated February 02, 2018. Letter of
commencement (LOC) for the consultancy services was issued vide letter no.
NHIDCL/Bharatmala/DPR/Phase-I /Lot-1/Package II/2017/80, dated April 13, 2018.
The project road comprises 5 stretches as mentioned in the RFP as mentioned below in Table
1.1
Stretches Description
Strech-1 Daboka – Manja (NH-29)
Strech-2 Manja- Lahorijan (NH-29)
Strech-3 Lahorijan – Khatkhati (NH-129)
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 1: Introduction
Stretches Description
Strech-4 Numaligar- Khatkhati (NH 129)
Strech-5 Khatkhati – Chumukademia (Dimapur Bypass)
Project location on state and district maps are presented on Figure 1.1 and 1.2 respectively.
Segment wise variation of lengths from RFP document is provided in Table 1.2.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 1: Introduction
Stretches
Node
as per Description RFP Length (km) Ground Length (Km) Remarks
Reference
RFP
Khatkhati –
Stretch already included in Dimapur Bypass (Under
5 D-F Chumukedeima 23 N/A *
Construction)
(Dimapur Bypass)
Total 251.8 217.1
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 1: Introduction
As mentioned in the above section, the project road has 5 (Five) stretches. However after
ground verification two road segments had been deleted as mentioned in Table 1.2. The details
of three road segments are mentioned as below:
i) The Daboka – Manja stretch under Nagaon – Dimapur Economic Corridor starts at Daboka –
Sutargaon More (26o6’56.85”N, 92o52’28.97”E) which is a junction of the project road i.e.
NH-29 (Old NH-36) and Nagaon - Lumding/ Silchar road. The chainage of the start point is
Km 39+500 of NH-29. The stretch runs along South-East direction and ends at the junction
(Manja Market) of the Project Road with Manja – Diphu – Lumding Road at existing Km
128+300 of NH-29 (25o58’14.79”N, 93o26’14.79”E). The Length of the stretch is about 88.8
Km.
ii) The Manja – Lahorijan stretch under Nagaon – Dimapur Economic Corridor starts at existing
Km 128+300 (25o58’14.79”N, 93026’14.79”E) and ends at Lahorijan (25o55’15.60”N,
93043’49.75”E), the outskirts of Dimapur. The end point is about 2 Km towards North from
the City Tower (Junction of NH-29 and NH-129). The stretch passes mainly forest stretches
and partly through the vicinity of Marat Wild Life Sanctuary. The Length of the stretch is
about 40.1 Km.
iii) The Numaligarh – Khatkhati stretch under Numaligarh – Dimapur Economic Corridor starts
at the Junction (26037’51.90”N, 93043’38.58”E) of NH-129 and NH-37 at Numaligarh and
ends at Khatkhati (25057’19.36”N, 93044’8.86”E) about 7 Km towards North from the City
Tower in Dimapur. The Length of the stretch is about 102 Km.
This report includes the road section as mentioned below from the Stretch -1 & 2 in Table 1.2
Section-3: From Km 65+923 (near Dokmoka) to Km 80+930 (near Loring Thepi Village)
i) PWD, NH Bakulia Division at Diphu – The jurisdiction of the division is from Daboka to
Lahorijan stretch of NH-29
i) DFO, Hojai Forest Division – The jurisdiction of the division is from Daboka to Dockmoka
along NH-29
ii) DFO, Karbi Anglong west Forest Division – The jurisdiction of the division is from Bokulia to
Lahorijan on right of existing project road Nh-29
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 1: Introduction
The project road stretch comprises of the following Land Revenue Authorities:-
i) Land Revenue Department under Karbi Anglong Autonomous Council (from Dokmoka to
Lahorijan via Manja)
ii) Land Revenue Department under DC, Hojai (from Daboka to Dokmoka)
The objective of the scheme presented in this report is to create a 4-lane partially access
controlled facility with provision of at grade intersections, grade separators with/without ramps
etc. as appropriate/necessary, within the stipulated Right-of-Way by improving the existing
single/two lane road and/or developing a new 4-lane road in case of locations with poor
geometry and dense settlements to a standard 4-lane road with paved shoulder. To this end,
land to the extent necessary will be acquired. Further, the development cost may be recouped,
to the extent practicable, from collection of tolls from users of the improved facility. As such,
the improvement schemes for the project road should be as economical as possible consistent
with the functional requirements and amenable for quick implementation without much
gestation delays.
The main objective of the consultancy services is to establish the technical, economical and
financial viability of the project and prepare detailed project reports for development of
economic corridors, inter-corridors and feeder routes, as the case may be. These corridors are
proposed for development to at least 4-lane access controlled (fully access control for Economic
Corridors). The Consultant has already consulted State/Central Governments, authorities,
Corporations and bodies dealing with works related to freight movement to assess the project
requirement.
The viability of the project shall be established taking into account the requirements with
regard to rehabilitation, upgrading and improvement based on highway design, pavement
design, provision of service roads wherever necessary, type of intersections, rehabilitation and
widening of existing and/or construction of new bridges and structures, road safety features,
quantities of various items of works, cost estimates and economic analysis within the given time
frame.
The Detailed Project Report (DPR) would inter-alia include detailed highway design, design of
pavement and overlay with options for flexible or rigid pavements, design of bridges and cross
drainage structures and grade separated structures, solutions for congestions/bottlenecks in
highway/routes including bypass alignment & design, if needed, safety aspects, design of
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 1: Introduction
service roads, quantities of various items, detailed working drawings, detailed cost estimates,
economic and financial viability analyses, environmental and social feasibility, social and
environmental action plans as appropriate and documents required for tendering the project on
commercial basis for international / local competitive bidding.
Other major objectives of consultancy services are preparation of DPR incorporating aspects of
value engineering, quality audit and safety audit requirement, carry out Road Safety Audit at
various stages as per TOR. Besides, viability analysis (both economic and financial), assessment
of preferred mode of implementation on which the civil works for the stretches are to be taken
up and cost estimates are also in the list.
General scope of services shall cover but shall not be limited to the following major tasks:
General
i) Review of all available reports and published information about the project road and
project influence area;
ii) Environmental and social impact assessment, including such as related to cultural
properties, natural habitats, involuntary resettlement etc.;
iia) Public consultation including consultation with communities located along the road,
NGOs working in the area, other stake holders and relevant Govt. departments at all
the
different stages of assignment (such as inception stage, feasibility stage, preliminary
design stage and once final designs are concretized);
iii) Detailed reconnaissance;
iv) Identification of possible improvements in the existing alignment and bypassing
congested locations with alternatives, evaluation of different alternatives with
comparison on techno-economic and other considerations and recommendations
regarding the most appropriate option;
v) Traffic studies including traffic surveys, axle load surveys and demand forecasting for
next thirty years;
vi) Inventory and condition surveys for road;
vii) Inventory and condition surveys for bridges, cross drainage structures, other structures,
river bank training/protection works and drainage provisions;
viii) Detailed topographic surveys using LiDAR equipped with minimum engineering grade
system or any other better technology having output accuracy not less than (a)
specified in IRC SP 19 (b) Total Station (c) GPS/ DGPS. The use of conventional high
precision instruments i.e Total Station or equivalent can be used at locations such as
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 1: Introduction
major bypasses, water bodies etc. where it may not be possible to survey using LiDAR.
Use of mobile / Aerial LiDAR survey is preferable;
ix) Pavement investigations;
x) Sub-grade characteristics and strength : investigation for required sub-grade and sub-
soil characteristics and strength for road and embankment design and sub-soil
investigation;
xi) Identification for source of construction material;
xii) Detailed design for road, its x-sections, horizontal and vertical alignment and design of
embankment for height more than 6.0m and also in poor soil conditions and where
density consideration require, even lesser height embankment. Detailed design for
structures, preparation of GAD and construction drawing and cross-drainage structures
and underpasses etc.;
xiii) Identification of type and the design of intersections;
xiv) Design of complete drainage system and disposal point for storm water;
xv) Value analysis/value engineering and project costing;
xvi) Economic and financial analysis;
xvii) Contract packaging and implementation schedule;
xviii) Strip plan indicating the scheme for carriageway widening, location of all existing utility
services (both over and underground) and the scheme for their relocation, trees to be
felled, transplanted and planted and land acquisition requirements including schedule
for LA : reports, documents and drawings arrangement of estimates for cutting/
transplanting of trees and shifting of utilities from the concerned department;
xix) Develop 3D engineered models of terrain and elevation, as-is project highway,
proposed and project highway along with all features, current and proposed structures,
current and proposed utilities and land acquisition plans;
xx) To find out financial viability of project for implementation and suggest the preferred
mode on which the project is to be taken up;
xxi) Preparation of Detailed Project Report, cost estimate, approved for construction
drawings, rate analysis, detailed bill of quantities, bid documents for execution for civil
work through budgeting resources;
xxii) Design for toll plaza, identification for their numbers and location and office cum
residential complex including working drawings;
xxiii) Design of weighing stations, parking areas and rest areas;
xxiv) Any other user oriented facility en-route toll facility;
xxv) Tie-in of ongoing/sanctioned works of MoRTH/NHIDCL/other agencies;
xxvi) Preparation of social plans for the project affected people as per policy of the lending
agencies/Govt. of India R&R policy;
The above points can be further discussed for refinement, prevalent practice and practicability
in details, if and as required, with NHIDCL during the course of project preparation.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 1: Introduction
Project preparation activities will be split into three stages as mentioned below.
The stages will generally follow a sequence though stages are inter-related and inter-dependent
on one another. This report is under Stage-4 activity.
The Detailed Project Report has been prepared in following four volumes:
This Main Report has been presented in the following structural format:
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 1: Introduction
Figure 1.1
Project Location on State Map
Scale - NTS
Project Location on District Map N
SONITPUR DISTRICT
JORHAT DISTRICT
GOLAGHAT
MARIGAON DISTRICT
Manja
NHIDCL PACKAGE-2
Sl Road Stretch Length Description
No in
km
DIMAHASAO
(CACHAR HILL) 2 Manja to Lahorijan (NH-29) 40.100 Project Road
MEGHALAYA STATE
3 Numaligarh to Khatkhati (NH-129) 102.000 Project Road
Figure 1.2
Project Location on District Map
Scale - NTS
t
E eha
37 Jor
Naogaon
Start of Stretch-4 129
km 0+000 of NH-129
Numaligarh
Deopahar
Near km 19+300
37
MJB
37A 129 Golaghat
129
MJB
Start of Proposed Nambor Bypass
km 22+040 of NH-129
km 29+300 of NH-129
End of Nambor Wildlife Sanctuary Rangajan
Lower
& Start of Garampani WLS
km 42+940 of NH-129 Daigurung RF
29 NAGALAND
Howrahghat
A Daboka Howrahghat Tinali
Start of Stretch-1
km 39+500 of NH-29 km 86+900
Patradisa Sariajan
km 63+700 Bokolia
DCRF 129
Proposed 29
Bokolia km 121+600 Langhit DCRF
54 Bypass Bokajan
Proposed 129
Longnit Start of Stretch-5
29
Manja
29 km 102+000 of NH-129 End of Stretch-3 & 4
Bypass Near km 144+400
km 122+600 MJB ur km 102+000 of NH-129
m ap r 129
i de Khatkhati
Manja B 29 n e D (Un on) D
La ss ti
Marat 4- ypa truc
29 B ons
4- pa tru
La ss ct
End of Stretch-1 & C
By ons
Wildlife Sanctuary Near km 144+000
ne (U ion
Start of Stretch-2 Lahorijan
C
km 145+400 Dimapur
Di nd )
km 128+300 of NH-29 C
m er
Lahorijan 129
ap
29
ur
Aokong
Start of Dimapur Byepass Daldali RF
Near km 157+400 of NH-29
Diphu
F Chumukedeima
Note: End of Stretch-5
The current project road will follow Daboka,Manja,Lahorijan,Khatkhati,Numaligarh & Dimapur Bypass.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 2: Existing Characteristics of the Project Road
CHAPTER 2
2.1 General
As mentioned in Chapter-1, the project road in this report comprises Section 3 as mentioned in
Table 2.1.
This section starts at km 66+000 near Dokmoka village (26°12'30.88"N, 93° 04'29.87"E). The
project road runs across Karbianglong district and terminates at Km 81+000 near Loring
Thepi Village (26° 7'39.09"N, 93° 8'51.02"E). The total length is 15+000 km.
Key plan of the project road is provided in Figure 1.1 whereas the index map is provided in
Figure 1.3.
The project road has following cardinal points including terminal points.
Consultants have captured co-ordinates (latitude and longitude) of various features like major
structures, major junctions etc. during reconnaissance survey through hand held GPS for various
cross referencing. A list of such co-ordinates is presented in Annexure 2.1.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 2: Existing Characteristics of the Project Road
➢ The important settlements in section-3 are Langhin, Sam Teron Gaon, Hati Khuli, Mizo
Teron, Lunse Timung.
In addition, few lower order settlements were also found at many locations along the project
road in scattered manner.
2.6 Connectivity
The project connects the settlements directly. Besides, it connects the following major towns:
• Guwahati through Nh-29 and Nh-129
• Jorhat, Shivasagar, Digboi, Tinsukhia and Dibrugarh through NH-129 and NH-37
• Silchar through NH-29 and NH-54
• Dimapur, Kohima and Imphal through NH-29 and NH-129
The project road is passing mainly through plain & rolling terrain. Around 33% of the project
road is passing through settlement areas with residential and commercial activities. Forest
stretch are found at few locations which covers about 37%. Landuse pattern for the balance
stretch is either agricultural or a mixture of agricultural, open and residential/commercial.
Residential and commercial structures along with shops abut only at the settlement areas
mentioned above. Along the project road, schools, health centers ,temples and mosques are
present.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 2: Existing Characteristics of the Project Road
Daboka_Manja-Stretch-I
Landuse Pattern Percentage
Residential/Commercial 33%
As per relevant information from respective PWD, NH Division and revenue maps, the existing
total ROW at built up area and forest area are found to vary between 10.0m-45.0m in total as
mentioned in Table 2.3.
Existing Ch.
Stretch Road Segment Existing Average ROW (m)
From To
Section 3
1 NH-29 66+000 81+000 30.00
Variable cross-sectional parameters were found for the project roa50d as mentioned in Table
2.4.
Table 2.4 : Existing Cross Sectional Parameters
Presence of roadside drain is not that conspicuous. However, at few built up stretches concrete
drains were observed along both side of road. In general, the project road is predominantly on
embankment varying between 1.0m-1.5m height.
2.10 Geometry
Horizontal Geometry
Detailed Project Report Page 3 of 6
Project: Consultancy Services for Preparation of DPR under Bharatmala Pariyojana
(Lot-1: Package II) [Tentative Length 217.1 km] Date: June 2020
Section-3: Km 65+923 – Km 80+930 Revision: R0
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 2: Existing Characteristics of the Project Road
Horizontal Alignment is found fair to poor along the project roads. However, at few locations
sharp curves are observed with geometric deficiencies with respect to super elevation and sight
distance where geometric improvements are required
Vertical Geometry
The vertical alignment is found mostly fair. However, at few locations inadequate sight distance
is observed and vertical alignment improvements are required.
Specific HFL Data as collected through local enquiry indicates that there is no location of
overtopping.
2.11 Pavement
The pavement all along the project road of stretch is provided with paved shoulder except at some
forest stretches.
The project road stretch forms at-grade intersection with cross road(s) at several locations.
There is no existing Major Intersections along this section as presented below:
Section-3: Nil
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 2: Existing Characteristics of the Project Road
Total 42 nos. structures are existing at site in this section. All the structures are 2-lane structures
except few bridges which are not having sufficient width. Parapets for most of the structures
were found fair to poor wherever present. Summary of existing structures are presented in
Table 2.8.
Table 2.8 : Summary of Existing Structures
No. of Existing Structures
Sections Road Segment Total
MJB MNB UP ROB Culvert
Km 66+000 (Dokmoka) to Km 81+000 (Loring
Section-3 - 3 - - 39 42
Thepi)
Except passenger shelter, shops and vehicle repair center, no major roadside facilities have been
found along the project corridor.
High tension and low-tension electrical lines exist on one or both sides of the project road at
patches. High-tension electric transmission line crosses the project road at few locations.
Indicating pillars of underground optical fiber cables were found at many locations. Oil pipelines
crosses the project road of stretch 2 at one location All necessary efforts shall be made to collect
relevant information from respective departments. Necessary letters for the purpose have been
obtained from client.
At a glance, existing deficiencies of the project road vis-à-vis their possible preventive measures
which needs attention during design stage are listed in Table 2.6.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 2: Existing Characteristics of the Project Road
No major critical areas of concern are there for the sections under consideration.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 3: Socio Economic Profile
CHAPTER 3
3.1 Introduction
A detailed accounting of the socio-economic profile of the Project Influence Area (PIA) has been
prepared which traces the PIA's economic performance of the past and establishes the likely
growth prospects of the future. The output of this Chapter is the economic growth prospects of
the PIA with respect to certain selected economic variables and serves as the basis for arriving at
a realistic traffic growth rate, for different vehicle categories.
The project, part of the Nagaon – Dimapur Economic Corridor, have three stretches viz., 1)
Daboka – Manja, passing through the districts of Hojai and East Karbi Anglong, 2) Manja –
Lahorijan, is in East Karbi Anglong district & 3) Numaligarh – Khatkhati, plying through East Karbi
Anglong and Golaghat district. All the project stretches are in Assam state of India. The details of
the project road stretches are presented in Chapter 1 of this report. This report is prepared for
Section 3 of the project corridor of stretch-1 & 2.
Section-3: From Km 65+923 (near Dokmoka) to Km 80+930 (near Loring Thepi Village)
The direct influence of the project is identified as the vicinity on both sides of the project road.
The indirect influence area will consist of 1) Hojai district, 2) East Karbi Anglong district. The
project road stretches, situated entirely Assam and the state is considered as the tertiary
influence area.
The socio-economic profile of the project influence area is prepared based on secondary official
sources of information.
The state of Assam is located in the in northeastern part of India. It is bounded by Bhutan and
Arunachal Pradesh state in the north, Nagaland and Manipur states in the east, Mizoram and
Tripura states in the south and Bangladesh, Meghalaya state and West Bengal state in the west.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 3: Socio Economic Profile
The neighboring states of Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Mizoram and Meghalaya are one part
of the Assam. The state capital of Assam, formerly Shillong (now the capital of Meghalaya) was
shifted to Dispur in suburb of Guwahati, in 1972.
Now, Assam has an area of 78,438 sq. km. and has 33 districts, including newly created 6
districts. 214 Urban Centres include Guwahati, one of the 100 fastest growing cities in the world.
Guwahati is the gateway to the North-East India. Silchar, (in the Barak valley) the 2nd most
populous city in Assam and an important centre of business, education and tourism. Other large
cities include Dibrugarh, an oil, natural gas, tea and tourism industry centre, Jorhat, and
Tinsukia.
Assam is shaped roughly like a “Y” laid on its side, is a land of plains and rivers valleys. The state
has three principal physical regions: the Brahmaputra River valley in the north, the Barak River
valley in the south, and the hilly region between Meghalaya (to the west) and Nagaland and
Manipur (to the east) in the south-central part of the state.
In the early 21st century about one-third of Assam was covered with various types of
woodlands, including tropical evergreen and deciduous forests, broad-leaved hill forests, pine
forests, and swamp forests, as well as grasslands. Assam is home to some 75 species of trees,
many of which have commercial value. Sal (Shorea robusta) and hollong (Dipterocarpus
rhetusus) trees are among the most bountiful of the hardwoods. Bamboo, orchids, and ferns
also are abundant.
Assam has numerous wildlife sanctuaries, the most prominent of which are two UNESCO World
Heritage sites: 1) Kaziranga National Park (designated in 1985), on the bank of the Brahmaputra
River, and 2) Manas Wildlife Sanctuary (designated in 1992), near the border with Bhutan. Both
are refuges for the fast-disappearing Indian one-horned rhinoceros, and the sanctuary at Manas
is known especially for its tigers and leopards. Among the other notable inhabitants of Assam’s
forests are elephants, gaurs (wild oxen), wild pigs, various species of deer, and primates, such as
langurs and hoolock gibbons. Common birds include cormorants, herons, ducks, and other
water birds, as well as warblers, thrushes, owls, and peacocks. Hornbills are characteristic of
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 3: Socio Economic Profile
Assam, although they are endangered in some areas. The state also has dozens of species of
reptiles, including poisonous snakes, such as kraits, cobras, and vipers; an array of lizards, skinks,
and geckos; and many types of turtles.
As per Census 2011, Assam has a population of 3,12,05,576. The decadal growth rate of
population is 17.07% during 2001 and 2011. Assam has predominantly rural having the share of
84.6%. The population density is 398 persons per square kilometer. The sex ratio is 958 females
per 1000 male population. The SC population is 7.15% and share of ST population is 12.45%, of
which the Bodos constitute the majority with 40% among the ST. The overall literacy rate is
72.19%. The share of BPL families is 31.98%.
Assamese and Bodo are the major indigenous and official languages, while Bengali is the second
most widely spoken languages after Assamese. Bodo is the third most spoken language.
Hinduism is the majority religion in the state at 61.47%, followed by Islam at 34.22% and
Christianity at 3.7%. Other religions are Buddhism, Jainism, Sikhism etc. Many Hindus in Assam
are followers of the Ekasarana Dharma sect of Hinduism, which gave rise to Namghar, designed
to be simpler places of worship than traditional Hindu temples.
Assam's economy is based on agriculture and oil. Assam produces more than half of India's tea.
The Assam-Arakan basin holds about a quarter of the country's oil reserves, and produces about
12% of its total petroleum. The economy of Assam today represents of backwardness amidst
plenty. Despite its rich natural resources, and supplying of up to 25% of India's petroleum needs.
According to the quick estimates of 2016-17, Assam's Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) is
₹249,801 crores at current prices and per capita income in Assam has reached ₹73,677.
The Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing sectors holds 19.33% of the GSDP, whereas Industrial
Sector accounts for 28.72% and service sector contributes 45.51%.
Assam has four oil refineries in Digboi (Asia's first and world's second refinery), Guwahati,
Bongaigaon and Numaligarh and with a total capacity of 7 million metric tonnes per annum.
There are several other industries, including a chemical fertiliser plant at Namrup, petrochemical
industries at Namrup and Bongaigaon, Paper mills at Jagiroad, Hindustan Paper Corporation Ltd.
Township Area Panchgram and Jogighopa, sugar mills at Barua Bamun Gaon, Chargola, Kampur,
Cement plant at Bokajan and Badarpur, cosmetics plant of Hindustan Unilever (HUL) at Doom
Dooma, etc. Moreover, there are other industries such as jute mill, textile and yarn mills, Assam
silk, and silk mills.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 3: Socio Economic Profile
Assam has a rich tradition of crafts, Cane and bamboo craft, bell metal and brass craft, silk and
cotton weaving, toy and mask making, pottery and terracotta work, wood craft, jewellery
making, and musical instruments making have remained as major traditions.
The tourism in Assam in Wildlife, cultural, and historical destinations have attracted visitors.
There are five national parks of 1) Kaziranga National Park, 2) Manas National Park, 3) Orang, 4)
Dibru-saikhowa and 5) Nameri. The Sivasagar consists of historical statues and structures of the
old Ahom Kingdom. The Kamakshya Temple in Nilachal Hills in Guwahati is a special Shaktipitha
of Hindu Religion and attracts a huge number of devotees all the year round.
Hojai is a new district in the state of Assam, in India. It was formed on 15 August 2015. Hojai is
the headquarter of the new district. Hojai district is formed with three tehsils of Nagaon district
named Hojai, Doboka and Lanka. The area of Hojai district is 1685 sq. km.
3.4.1 Location
Hojai district is surrounded by districts of Nagaon and East Karbi Anglong in north, East Karbi
Anglong and Dima Hasao in south, East Karbi Anglong in east and West Karbi Anglong and Dima
Hasao in west.
3.4.2 Climate
The climate in Hojai is warm and temperate. The average annual temperature is 24.4 °C.
Precipitation here averages 1562 mm.
3.4.3 Religion
The main religions are Muslim (54%), Hindu (46%) of district population. The other religions are
Christian, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain etc.
3.4.4 Demography
As per Indian census 2011, those three tehsils together had a population of 931,218. So, newly
formed Hojai district had a population of 931,218 in 2011, among them 51% are male and 49%
are female. The sex ratio is 954. The majority of the population, nearly 81% live in Hojai
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 3: Socio Economic Profile
District rural part and 19% population live in the Hojai District urban part.
3.4.5 Literacy
Hojai has an average literacy rate of 75%, while male literacy is 80%, and female literacy is 70%.
Hojai has 34% (about 3.2 lakh) population engaged in either main or marginal works. 53% male
and 14% female population are working population. 43% of total male population are main (full
time) workers and 10% are marginal (part time) workers. For women 6% of total female
population are main and 8% are marginal workers.
The East Karbi Anglong district is a new district formed out of the existing Karbi Anglong District
of Assam in 2016. Diphu is the headquarter of the newly formed district. The district is a part of
Karbi Anglong Autonomous Council, Diphu and it is administered according to the Sixth
Scheduled of the Indian Constitution. The total area of the district is 7,399 sq. km.
3.5.1 Location
East Karbi Anglong district is surrounded by districts of Nagaon and Golaghat in north, State of
Nagaland in south, Golghat district in east and Hojai and Dima Hasao districts in west. The
district is with dense tropical forest covered hills and flat plains.
3.5.2 Climate
The district experiences different climate in different parts. January being the coldest with
minimum temperature between 5°C to 6°C. Whereas, the summer temperature reaches as high
as 32°C. Rainfall is heavy during June to September with average rainfall of 2416 mm.
3.5.3 Demography
The population of the district is predominantly tribal. The major tribal ethnic groups of this
district are Karbis, Bodos, Kukis, Dimasas, Hmars, Garos, Rengma Nagas, Tiwas, Man (Tai
Speaking’s). Besides, a large number of non-tribals also live together in this hill region.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 3: Socio Economic Profile
The population of the district is 6,60,955 with 85.61% of Rural population and 14.39% of urban.
The males constitute of 51.29% and females are 48.71%. The sex ratio is 950.
The district is basically an agricultural district. Different types of agricultural crops are cultivated
among which paddy is the main crop. Except for the valleys, the people follow the jhum system
of cultivation.
3.5.5 Minerals
There are different kinds of minerals found in this hill district, as Lime stone, China-clay, Feldspar
and Coal
3.5.6 Economy
The district economy depends mainly on the agriculture. The lands are more fertile and that is
the boon to the people by nature, but they still use primitive methods of cultivation and
frequently shifts the area of cultivation through Jhum farming. East Karbi Anglong has
favourable climate for horticulture, however, the horticulture and plantation crops are generally
not grown on commercial scale.
The 1,80,127.5 Hectres of forest in the district offers a big economy not only for the district but
also for the state. The forests are covered with dense bamboo and grasses, valuable trees like
Hollock, Gamari, San, Sonaru, Titasopa, Bonsum, Koroi, Foma etc. are in abundance.
Although the district is abundant in raw materials, but only a few industries have come up. They
are: 1) Bokajan Cement Plant, 2) Karbi Chemical Mini Cement Plant, 3) Food Processing, 4)
Rubber Plantation Industry, 5) Citronella Plantation Industry. There are a number of Tea
Gardens in the district.
The economic development of the area is dependent on land use pattern and efficient uses of
the resources. Although resources are plenty but they are not properly utilized for the economic
benefits.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 3: Socio Economic Profile
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
CHAPTER 4
4.1 Introduction
The Consultants have conducted different types of field studies, engineering surveys and
investigations to gather data and information necessary for project preparation. The aim of the
investigations was to develop an adequate supportive database for selecting and preparing the
most appropriate proposal to meet the functional and structural efficiency and safety
requirements. The engineering investigations and surveys have been carried out in line with the
specifications laid out in the TOR. The basic data and results of investigation are compiled and
included in Volume-II of this Report.
The following engineering survey and investigations were conducted or yet to be conducted:
a) Reconnaissance Survey
b) Road Inventory
c) Pavement Condition Survey by manual assessment and NSV
d) Inventory and Condition Survey of Existing Bridges, Culverts and Other Structures
e) Alternative Alignment Study for Bypasses
f) Topographic Survey
g) Traffic Survey
h) Axle Load Survey
i) FWD Survey
j) Roughness Survey
k) Pavement Investigation
l) Material Investigation
m) Sub Soil Exploration
This is basically a visual survey of the project road and its environs, and this activity has already
been completed by the concerned key personnel of the Consultant’s team after a study of
available maps of the area. Accordingly, teams for subsequent survey and investigation planned
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
for mobilization to the site. Consultant has made videography of the entire corridor to have a
general appreciation of the project road. The assessment of important aspects made during
reconnaissance including few problems as perceived is brought out below:
A preliminary observation of the topographical features in the project road corridor and
surrounding area was made during
reconnaissance survey. The terrain, the roadside
physical features, road alignment, drainage
characteristics, existence of major bridges and
structures, railway crossings, junctions, problems
at site, etc. were noted. This helped in making an
assessment of the nature and complexity of the
project, which in turn, determined the extent of
the various surveys and investigations required
for the project preparation.
b) Widening Scheme
Side of widening has been assessed during this study. Location of roadside settlements,
water bodies, utilities, curvature, forest area, existing ROW etc. were considered to
assess the most suitable widening scheme. Normally attempt shall be made to match
the edge of existing carriageway with respective median edge of proposed road.
Concentric widening shall be followed in built-up locations, forest areas and cut
sections.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
There are many cross roads along the project road. During reconnaissance survey it was
found that some roads seem to carry very low traffic and there is no prime facie warrant
for grade-separation but for some of cross roads,it appears from first impression that
there is a requirement of grade separator for the crossing of NH & SH’s.
Primary inventory data of road, bridge, culverts, intersections, utility lines, trees,
landuse, roadside features, etc. have alsobeen collected from site. The inventory data
will constitute an important input for the Report.
A detailed inventory of the existing road has been prepared through dimensional measurements
and visual inspection to assess the existing status. Features like existing kilometerage, terrain,
landuse, width of pavement and shoulders,
height of embankment, geometric
deficiencies, important road intersections,
utilities, other features etc. were recorded.
Findings of Road Inventory have been
presented in Appendix 4.1-4.9(included in
Volume-II) as mentioned below. The
inventory is essentially included to collect
physical information on the road and its
environment for enabling preliminary
assessment of the project.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
A World Bank Class 1 profiler, the NSV DLP measures road profile in one or two wheel-paths
using accelerometers and up to two precision laser sensors to compensate for vehicle body
movement. The DLP is completely portable using a
detachable sensor beam and comes complete with a
tow-bar mounting kit, making it perfect for less
frequent survey demands. An accurate Distance
Measuring Instrument (DMI) and the Heartbeat
module are used to precisely link the data to
distance/chainage. It is used in conjunction with the
Hawkeye Processing Toolkit software, operators to
produce a wide range of reports to review network
condition and performance. This information can
then be simply exported to CSV, or applications such
as HDM-4 and GIS tools.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
The NSV is capable of supporting a profiler with up-to three lasers, two digital imagery cameras,
DGPS and a Gipsi-Trac Geometry system
The study shall identify defects and road section with similar characteristics i.e. homogeneous
sections.
Pavement condition survey, using NSV, has been carried out for the stretches of NH-29
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
% area of potholes
Rut depth, measured transversely across the outer wheel paths using 2 meter long straight edge
and graduated wedge. Shoulder and embankment conditions by visual means and the existence
of distress modes and extent thereof were noted. The field data has been recorded at 500m
interval.
No Alternative alignment study was conducted in section 3. To maintain the design speed ,
avoid congestion and environmental impact, service roads are proposed in built-up sections.
These improvements are in addition to minor curve improvement proposed at various locations
along the route.
The specific objective of the topographical survey is to delineate accurately the complete
existing natural and man-made features, so as to study and develop the existing road to 4 lane
with paved shoulder, creating an accurate Digital Terrain Model, which is also a fundamental
requirement to design the highway through latest software. The detailed topographical survey
for the new and existing road shall be carried out in consonance with the procedure outlined in
the TOR using LiDAR, Total Station and Auto Level.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
(3) Cross-section Surveying/Detailing: Detailed cross sections shall be surveyed at 25m interval,
in general, using Total Station. The cross sections shall be extended up to the survey limits
mentioned earlier. The main features captured in the cross-sections are:
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
The data for each survey point shall be recorded in terms of Northing, Easting, and Elevation. To
ensure standardization of works of different survey teams and to facilitate further CAD works, a
rational coding system shall be developed and used.
The survey data collected in the field shall be downloaded in text file format and converted to
graphic files using suitable software.
Following traffic surveys were conducted at site to assess the present and future traffic on the
project highway:
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
This survey was conducted to obtain the structural strength of existing pavement in accordance
with IRC 115:2014 requirements.
Based on the data collected from condition survey, the road length has been classified into
sections of uniform performance in accordance with the criteria given in the following table.
As it is inexpedient to change the sample size for deflection measurement at frequent intervals,
it is always preferable to keep the length of each uniform section at a minimum of 1 km except
in the case of localized failures or in other situations requiring closer examination where
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
minimum length of section should be 0.3 km from the consideration of profile correction and
constructability.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
Mass
Deflection Sensors
Different magnitudes of impulse load can be obtained by selection of a suitable mass and an
appropriate height of fall. Under the application of the impulse load, the pavement deflects.
Velocity transducers are placed on the pavement surface at different radial locations to measure
surface deflections. Geophones or seismometers are used as displacement transducers. Load
and deflection data are acquired with the help of a data acquisition system.
Typical Falling Weight Deflectometers (FWD) include a circular loading plate of 300 or 450 mm
diameter. In these guidelines 300 mm diameter load plate is recommended. A rubber pad of 5
mm minimum thickness should be glued to the bottom of the loading plate for uniform
distribution of load. Alternatively, segmented loading plates (with two to four segments) can be
used for better load distribution.
A falling mass in the range of 50 to 350 kg is dropped from a height of fall in the range of 100 to
600 mm to produce load pulses of desired peak load and duration. Heavier models use falling
mass in the range of 200 to 700 kg. The target peak load to be applied on bituminous pavements
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
is 40 kN (+/- 4 kN), which corresponds to the load on one dual wheel set of a 80 kN standard axle
load. The target peak load can be decreased suitably if the peak maximum (central) deflection
measured with 40 kN load exceeds the measuring capacity of the deflection transducer.
Similarly, the load can be increased to produce deflection of at least 10µm at a radial distance of
1.2 m. If it is known from construction records or from coring or from test pits that subgrade is
stiff and hence smaller than 10 pm deflections are expected, testing with increased loads will
not be required. If the applied peak load differs from 40 kN, the measured deflections have to
be normalized to correspond to the standard target load of 40 kN. The normalization of
deflections can be done linearly. For example, if the measured deflection is 0.80 mm for an
applied peak load of 45 kN, the normalized deflection for a standard load of 40 kN is 0.711 mm
(0.80 * (40/45)). The load cells used to measure load pulses produced by FWD should have a
reading resolution of 0.1 kN or better and should give readings accurate to 2 percent of
measured value.
The stiffness of bituminous layers and hence the response of a pavement depends on the pulse
shape of the applied load (COST 336, 2005). Most FWDs have a load rise time (from start of
pulse to peak) of between 5 ms and 30 ms and have a load pulse base width in the interval of 20
ms to 60 ms (COST 336, 2005). The duration of impulse load is maintained approximately equal
to the time needed to traverse the length of a tyre imprint at a speed of about 60 km/h which is
in the range of 20 to 30 ms. The FWDs used for evaluation should be capable of producing load
pulses with loading time in the range of 15 to 50 ms.
Sufficient number of deflection transducers should be used to adequately capture the shape of
deflection bowl. Six to nine velocity transducers (geophones) are generally adequate for
measuring surface deflections of flexible pavements. Deflection sensors are placed on the
surface of pavement at different radial direction aligned in the longitudinal direction. The
deflection transducers used should have a reading resolution of at least 1 µm and 5 should be
accurate to +/- 2 percent of the reading. Typical geophone position configurations (number and
radial distances measured from center of load plate) commonly used for flexible pavement
evaluation are ;- (i) 7 sensors at 0, 300, 600, 900, 1200, 1500 and 1800 mm radial distances (ii) 7
sensors at 0, 200, 300, 450, 600, 900, 1500 mm radial distances (iii) 6 sensors at 0, 300, 600, 900,
1200 and 1500 mm radial distances and (iv) 6 sensors at 0, 200, 300, 600, 900, 1200 mm radial
distances.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
The FWD test data collected from different load drops at each test point primarily consist of
peak load, peak deflections at different radial locations. Unrealistic deflection values and
obviously erroneous data must be removed. Some of the checks that should be appliedto the
deflection data are:-
(i) deflections should decrease with increasing distance from the loading plate and
(ii) deflection values should not be more than the capacity of the sensors.
Average values of load and deflections are calculated from the three drop test data collected at
a given location.
The identification of sections of uniform performance done in Section 4 of these guidelines was
done primarily to select an appropriate sample size for conducting deflection testing. Since the
assessment of the remaining life of existing pavement and the strengthening requirement in
terms of bituminous overlay will be done on the basis of the back calculated moduli of in-service
pavement layers, it is prudent to identify homogeneous sections for the purpose of structural
design primarily based on deflection bowl parameters and other relevant information.
Other parameters as may be deemed suitable can also be considered for this purpose. Surface
Curvature Index (SCI) calculated as the difference between D0 and D3QQ where, D0 and D3QQ are the
peak deflections (mm) measured at the center of loading plate and at a radial distance of 300
mm is a bowl shape parameter, which reflects the contribution of upper layers, is the bowl
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
shape parameter to be used, along with other parameters, for identification of homogeneous
sections. SCI is expressed in mm here whereas the parameter is used in inches or mils in many
empirical expressions available in literature for empirically estimating moduli of layers.
_ i=n
∑
X = (1/n) k(xi)
i=1
Wherever the trend changes from positive to negative and vice-versa in the plot of cumulative
difference VS distance (or number of test location), that should be considered as a possible
delineator for identifying homogeneous sections. However, judgment has to be applied for
considering a particular change in trend to be significant enough to suggest the presence of a
delineator there.
Homogeneous sections can be identified with reference to different parameters such as SCI,
traffic, subgrade strength, etc. Delineation carried out based on different parameters will yield a
number of sub-sections. No sub-section should be shorter than 1.0 km in length and each
subsection should have at least twelve deflection test locations. If a subsection has only one or
two test points, it is a case of the pavement in need of localized rehabilitation measures. The
spacing considered for deflection measurement in each subsection can be rounded off to
convenient practical values.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
The following steps have been followed for measuring deflections at each test point. The exact
sequence of operations may be different for different models of FWD.
(i) Mark the test point on the pavement.
(ii) Centre the load plate of the duly calibrated FWD over the test point.
(iii) Lower the loading plate onto the pavement. There should be no standing water (surface
texture completely filled with water) on the pavement surface. The loading plate should
be in proper contact with pavement surface. If a non-segmental plate is used the presence
of rutting at test location should be noted if it affects the contact between plate and
pavement surface. The longitudinal and transverse slope of the pavement should not
exceed 10 percent at the test location for accurate measurement of deflection.
(iv) Lower the frame holding the displacement transducers (geophones) so that the
transducers are in contact with pavement surface
(v) Raise the mass to a pre-determined height required for producing a target load of 40 kN
(vi) Drop one seating load. Load and deflection data for seating load drop need not be
recorded
(vii) Raise the mass and drop. Record load and deflection data into the computer through data
acquisition system. While peak load and peak deflections at different selected radial
positions must be recorded, complete time history of load and deflections can be stored
for each load drop if feasible
(viii) Repeat step at least two more times.
(ix) If, during steps vii and viii, the deflections measured are too large or too small as
discussed in Clause 4.4, the test may be repeated by changing the peak load
(x) Raise the geophone frame and load plate and move to the next test location
(xi) Record air temperature at half hourly interval
(xii) Record pavement surface temperature (optional) if non-contact temperature sensors are
available
(xiii) Measure pavement surface layer temperature at half-hourly intervals by drilling holes of
40 mm depth into the pavement surface layer. Fill the hole with a drop of glycerol. Insert
the thermometer into the hole and record the temperature after three minutes
(xiv) Deflection measurements should not be made when the pavement temperature is more
than 45°C. Guidelines given in Clause 6.4.3 may be followed for deflection measurement
in colder areas and areas of altitude greater than 1000m.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
The survey has been carried out to assess the roughness index survey of existing pavement. The
results of the survey will be expressed in terms of BI and IRI, and shall be presented in both
tabular and graphical forms. Based on the data, homogenous segments with respect to surface
roughness has been determined based on cumulative difference method.
The roughness values which represent pavement functional performance are essentially
intended for use in economic/financial analysis, and for checking against the pavement designs
proposed for different sections.
The equipment used for the survey is Network Survey Vehicle (NSV) mounted laser
profilometer. Detailed description of equipment, data capture methodology and type of output
data are already provided in para 4.4 of this chapter.
In addition, the following criteria have been met by the process of defect detection:
Roughness measurement with outputs of both raw longitudinal profiles and IRI calculation
shall be reported at 100m referenced to the preceding LRP. The roughness must meet
ASTM-E950 (equivalent to Class I road profiler).
The IRI shall be determined for both wheel-paths over a minimum length of 250m for a
minimum of 6 calibration sites with a roughness range between 2m/km and 8m/km.
Calibration shall be made for speeds of 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 km/hour.
The survey was conducted along the outer wheel paths covering two runs along the wheel paths
for each direction. The data derived from survey have been compared with the data obtained
from the pavement condition survey and assessment of riding over the road.
Roughness survey, using NSV, has been carried out for the stretch of NH-29. Result obtained
from the survey is summarized below:
The basic objective of the investigation was to form a database for characterization of existing
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
pavement. The investigation was carried out by digging trial pits staggered left/right.
4.11.2 Large Pits (1m x 1m x 1m) and small Pit (0.5m x 0.5m x 0.5m)
Large Trial pits of size 1m x 1m x 1m and small trial pit size 0.5m
x 0.5m x 0.5m were dug at the pavement shoulder interface,
extending through the pavement layers down to the subgrade
level. Pits were at least 300 mm within the carriageway. Pits
were made in such a way that half of the pit remains within the
carriageway and the other half (in the shoulder), ensuring
minimum damage to the original pavement and disruption to
the traffic. Large test pits are done on both sides of the project
road were dug at the pavement shoulder interface extending through the pavement layers
down to the sub-grade level
The following sequence of operation was followed for each large test pit:
• Manual excavation of 1.0 m x 1.0 x1.0 m and 0.5m x 0.5m x 0.5m pit down to subgrade
level .The thickness of the different pavement layers were measured and type of
material examined and logged from three sides.
• Field (in-situ) dry density using sand replacement method as per IS 2720: Part 28 was
carried out at the subgrade level.
• Adequate sample in sealed polythene bag
were collected for classification tests as per
IS: 2720 (relevant parts)
- Field moisture content
- Grain size analysis
- Atterberg limits
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
After the completion of field tests and collection of samples, the pits were backfilled with the
excavated materials and compacted suitably so as not to jeopardize the smooth movement of
traffic of the existing road.
The existing pavement structure mostly comprises of three layers, namely bituminous layer,
base course and sub-base course. During the present investigation the surfacing course is
reported, on the whole, as bituminous course (BC). The base course comprises of stone,gravel,
cobble mix with clay mix with sand only and few stretchespresent in WBM mix. The sub-base
course consists mainly occasional presence of sand layer along the stretches.
The total thickness of the pavement varies from 745 mm to 990 mm. The thickness of the
bituminous surfacing layer varies from 20 mm to 110 mm. The thickness of the base layer ranges
from 95 to 270 mm. The thickness of the sub-base layer ranges from 86 to 280 mm.
The existing pavement structure mostly comprises of two and three layers, namely bituminous
layer varies from 20mm to 180 mm thick, base course varies from 95mm to 320 mm and sub-
base course varies from 70mm to 280 mm thick. Details of existing pavement composition
(Large Pits) is provided inTable 4.4.
Table 4.4 :Details of Existing Pavement Composition
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
The laboratory test results consist of gradation, Atterberg limits, field moisture content, Field
dry density (FDD), compaction characteristics (maximum dry density and optimum moisture
content relationship as per heavy compaction), CBR (soaked) etc. for the subgrade soils
underneath the existing pavement.
The fraction of the materials of the sub-grade soils passing 75 sieve is 13.06% to 15.05 % on an
average,
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
The liquid limits for existing pavement of the soil are NP to plastic. Plasticity index for existing
pavement soils are 7.7 to 11.7.
4.11.7 Moisture Content vs. Dry Unit Weight Relationship (Heavy Compaction)
Soil samples obtained by test pits have been compacted in the laboratory at various moisture
contents to derive moisture content vs. dry unit weight relationship. The method of heavy
compaction in accordance with IS 2720 (Part 8) has been used. The results of heavy compaction
test carried out on sub-grade samples of existing pavement to determine the maximum dry
density (MDD) and optimum moisture content (OMC) relationship.
For existing sub-grade soil the maximum dry density (MDD) of ranges between 18.10 kN/ m3 and
18.78 kN/m3. The optimum moisture content varies between 10.1 % and 12.7 %. The result
indicates that the maximum dry density of existing sub-grade soil is greater than 17.5 kN/ m3 at
all chainages which satisfies the unit weight requirement of sub-grade soil as specified by
MORT&H.
California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests were carried out on the pit samples in the laboratory as per
standard procedures. At optimum moisture content (OMC) soil samples were compacted at
three different energy levels corresponding to 10 blows, 35 blows, 65 blows as per IS:2720 (Part
8). These compacted soils at different compaction levels were tested after immersion in water
for four days. Soaked CBR at 97% maximum dry density (MDD) has been interpolated from CBR-
dry density curve. The Stretch I soil, soaked CBR value at 97% MDU ranges from 7.5 % to 10.9 %.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
DABOKA TO MANJA
MOISTURE DRY DENSITY
S.NO. CHAINAGE (KM) SIDE MDD (gm/cc)
CONTENT (%) (gm/cc)
3 49+000 RHS 8.00 1.695 1.810
4 53+500 LHS 5.00 1.706 1.825
5 57+500 RHS 7.00 1.714 1.840
6 65+000 RHS 4.00 1.738 1.878
7 70+000 RHS 5.00 1.697 1.832
8 75+000 LHS 4.50 1.717 1.827
9 80+000 RHS 5.50 1.734 1.887
10 85+000 RHS 4.50 1.726 1.865
11 90+000 RHS 6.00 1.704 1.835
12 95+000 RHS 5.00 1.719 1.829
13 100+000 RHS 5.50 1.696 1.821
14 104+000 RHS 8.00 1.709 1.844
15 113+000 LHS 9.00 1.735 1.859
16 118+000 RHS 8.00 1.742 1.854
17 123+000 RHS 6.00 1.704 1.831
18 128+000 RHS 4.00 1.714 1.839
MANJA TO LAHORIJAN
1 128+500 LHS 7.00 1.690 1.831
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
DABOKA TO MANJA
Heavy
Grain size analysis Atterberg Limits
Compaction AT 97 %
Sl. Chainage
SIDE Silt & FSI CBR
No. (Km.) Gravel Sand MDD OMC PL PI
Clay LL (%) Soaked
(%) (%) (gm/cc) (%) (%) (%)
(%)
1 RHS 38+600 3.10 43.80 53.10 1.846 11.10 32.20 21.70 10.50 15.00 10.2
2 RHS 43+000 0.00 22.30 77.70 1.816 12.50 35.20 23.60 11.60 30.00 7.6
3 RHS 49+000 0.00 21.40 78.60 1.810 12.70 35.30 23.70 11.60 30.00 7.5
4 LHS 53+500 0.00 24.20 75.80 1.825 12.30 34.60 23.60 11.00 25.00 8.1
5 RHS 57+500 1.80 40.30 57.90 1.840 11.50 32.70 22.10 10.60 17.50 10.1
6 RHS 65+000 4.70 49.10 46.20 1.878 10.10 30.20 20.90 9.30 7.50 10.9
7 RHS 70+000 0.00 34.30 65.70 1.832 12.10 33.10 22.70 10.40 20.00 9.0
8 LHS 75+000 0.00 26.70 73.30 1.827 12.30 34.20 23.20 11.00 22.50 8.4
9 RHS 80+000 5.30 51.00 43.70 1.887 10.00 29.70 20.60 9.10 7.50 11.1
10 RHS 85+000 4.50 48.00 47.50 1.865 10.30 30.60 21.10 9.50 10.00 10.5
11 RHS 90+000 1.10 35.30 63.60 1.835 12.00 32.90 22.50 10.40 20.00 9.3
12 RHS 95+000 0.00 28.60 71.40 1.829 12.20 33.70 23.10 10.60 22.50 8.7
13 RHS 100+000 0.00 23.50 76.50 1.821 12.40 34.90 23.60 11.30 27.50 7.9
14 RHS 104+000 2.60 41.90 55.50 1.844 11.20 32.50 21.90 10.60 15.00 10.2
15 LHS 113+000 3.60 47.20 49.20 1.859 10.70 31.90 21.30 10.60 12.50 10.4
16 RHS 118+000 4.10 45.00 50.90 1.854 10.80 32.10 21.40 10.70 12.50 10.4
17 RHS 123+000 0.00 30.80 69.20 1.831 12.10 33.50 22.70 10.80 20.00 8.8
18 RHS 128+000 1.40 37.80 60.80 1.839 11.80 32.70 22.20 10.50 17.50 9.7
MANJA TO LAHORIJAN
1 LHS 128+500 1.60 29.80 68.60 1.831 12.00 33.70 23.20 10.50 25.00 8.9
2 LHS 133+000 4.90 49.30 45.80 1.883 10.50 28.20 20.40 7.80 10.00 11.0
3 LHS 138+000 0.00 26.60 73.40 1.822 12.40 34.20 23.60 10.60 27.50 8.3
4 LHS 143+000 4.20 40.50 55.30 1.865 11.00 29.90 21.70 8.20 12.50 10.4
5 LHS 148+000 0.00 20.20 79.80 1.809 12.90 35.60 24.00 11.60 30.00 7.7
6 RHS 153+000 3.50 35.90 60.60 1.853 11.30 31.20 22.40 8.80 17.50 10.2
7 LHS 156+000 2.80 34.00 63.20 1.848 11.60 32.10 22.90 9.20 20.00 9.8
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
Grain Size
The fraction of the materials of the Borrow area soils passing 75m sieve is 14.05 % on an
average, indicating higher sand and clay content in the borrow area soil and that the soils are
predominantly Gravely sandy Clay. (mix with moorum)
Atterberg Limit
The liquid limit for borrow soil are plastic to NP. Plasticity index for Borrow area soils are 08 to
11.4.
For borrow area soil the maximum dry density (MDD) of ranges between 18.26 kN/ m3and
18.52kN/ m3 .The optimum moisture content varies between 10.40. % and 11.7% . The result
indicates that the maximum dry density of borrow area soil is greater than 17.5 kN/m 3 at all
chainages which satisfies the unit weight requirement of sub-grade soil as specified by
MORT&H.
The Stretch I soil, soaked CBR value at 97% MDU ranges from 8.1 % to 9.2 %.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
DABOKA TO MANJA
AT 97 %SHOAKED
Grain Size Analysis Heavy Compaction Atterberg's Limit
SAMPLE NO.
FSI (%)
SL. No
CBR
Gravel (%)
OMC (%)
Sand (%)
(gm/cc)
PL (%)
LL (%)
PI (%)
MDD
(%)
1 BA-1 3.80 37.40 58.80 1.852 10.40 33.10 22.80 10.30 20.00 9.2
2 BA-2 0.00 25.80 74.20 1.826 11.70 35.10 24.10 11.00 27.50 8.1
3 BA-3 2.30 31.70 66.00 1.844 10.60 33.90 23.20 10.70 22.50 8.8
4 BA-4 0.00 18.70 81.30 1.813 12.50 36.10 24.70 11.40 30.00 7.6
5 BA-5 7.60 47.20 45.20 1.891 9.40 29.40 20.30 9.10 10.00 11.9
6 BA-6 2.00 28.70 69.30 1.837 11.40 34.40 23.60 10.80 25.00 8.5
7 BA-7 6.30 44.10 49.60 1.875 9.70 30.30 20.90 9.40 12.50 10.7
8 BA-8 4.70 41.40 53.90 1.856 10.00 32.40 22.10 10.30 15.00 9.6
9 BA-9 1.60 27.00 71.40 1.831 11.90 34.60 23.80 10.80 25.00 8.4
10 BA-10 5.80 43.20 51.00 1.863 9.90 31.80 21.40 10.40 15.00 10.1
11 BA-11 0.00 23.40 76.60 1.818 12.10 35.70 24.30 11.40 30.00 7.9
MANJA TO LAHORIJAN
1 BA-1 4.90 29.50 65.60 1.853 11.10 32.80 22.50 10.30 20.00 9.6
2 BA-2 7.50 32.30 60.20 1.861 10.60 31.30 21.90 9.40 20.00 10.8
The material
investigation for road
construction has been
carried out to identify the
potential sources of
construction materials
and to assess their
general availability,
engineering properties
and quantities. This is
one of the most important factors for stable, economic and successful implementation of the
road program within the stipulated time. The material investigation is quite representative, but
more exhaustive search may surely be explored by the contractors at the time of construction.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
For improvement work as well as for new construction the list of materials includes the
following:
Source locations indicating places, kilometerage, availability and the status whether in
operation or new source.
Access to source, indicating the direction and nature of the access road i.e. left/ right of
project road, approximate lead distance from the gravity center and type of access road.
Ownership of land/ quarries, either government or private.
Test results, indicating the quality of materials with respect to their suitability in
construction.
Probable use indicating the likely use of materials at various stages of construction work
i.e. fill material, sub-grade, sub-base, base, bituminous surfacing and cross drainage
structures.
The potential sources of construction materials were selected from consideration of the
availability and suitability of the materials, easy access to the source and minimum hauling
distance from the source in order to make the construction economical and feasible as far as
possible. The samples from various identified sources have been collected for laboratory
testing as per IRC/MORT&H/BIS standards.
A) Coarse Aggregate
Coarse aggregates such as trap rocks consisting of mainly basalt, black and grey in colour, are
available in the vicinity of the project road. Stone quarries have been primarily identified as
stone aggregate source for construction of various components of road, namely, Bituminous
Concrete, Semi dense Bituminous concrete (SDBC), Dense Bituminous Macadam (DBM), Wet
Mix Macadam (WMM), Granular sub-Base (GSB) as well as for the cement concrete works. The
sources identified including their location details, lead distance and availability of the stones are
tabulated in Table 4.8.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
Laboratory tests carried out for the abovementioned samples are presented in Table 4.9to
Table 4.10 respectively.
Laboratory test results summary of coarse aggregates has been presented in Table 4.11
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
The results from Table 4.11indicate that all the quarry samples are of approved standard and
can be used for Road construction.
B) Fine Aggregate
Many sources have been identified are available in the vicinity of the project road. The quarry
location and approximate lead distance from project is given in Table 4.12
S. No. Sample No Crusher plant location/Village Name Village Name Side Lead (km)
Laboratory tests were conducted on the sand samples collected from the River and are
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
Sieve Size % of
Sl. No. FA Zone I FA Zone II FA Zone III FA ZONE IV
(mm) passing
1 10 99.12 100 100 100 100
2 4.75 97.66 90 - 100 90 - 100 90 - 100 95-100
3 2.36 89.42 60 - 95 75 - 100 85 - 100 95-100
4 1.18 68.47 30 - 70 55 - 90 75 - 100 90-100
5 600 mic 43.20 15 - 34 35 - 59 60 - 79 80-100
6 300 mic 13.62 5-20 8-30 12-40 15-50
7 150 mic 2.08 0 - 10 0 - 10 0 - 10 0-15
8 Fineness Modulus (F.M) of FA 2.864
9 Specific Gravity 2.628
10 Water absorption 1.14
Table 4.13 shows that fine medium coarse sand is available from the above river. The grading
zone and fineness modulus of above stone crusher Zone II & Zone II(IS 383 2016) and 2.798 &
2.864 respectively, indicating that it is suitable for road pavement and structural concreting
works.
Gradation of GSB and WMM sample are provided in Appendix 4.21 and 4.22 respectively.
Cement, bitumen, steel are the manufactured materials. Cement and steel with I.S. certification
are indigenously available in abundance from the manufacturers. Bitumen of VG-10,VG-20,VG-
30&VG-40 viscosity grade and emulsion are available from IOCL Mumbai, within the vicinity of
project road .The regular supply of bitumen and cement can be satisfactorily met by advance
agreements with the manufacturers. The grades of bitumen should be selected as per the
guidelines of the MORT&H Specifications for Road and Bridge Works.
A) Cement
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
Cement to be used in the construction work shall be any of the following types with the prior
approval of the Engineer:
The chloride content in cement shall in no case exceed 0.05 percent by mass of cement. Also,
total sulphur content calculated as sulphuric anhydride (SO3) shall in no case exceed 2.5 percent
and 3.0 percent when tri-calcium aluminates present by mass is upto 5 or greater than 5
respectively. Good quality Cement is locally available.
B) Steel
For plain and reinforced concrete (PCC and RCC) or pre-stressed concrete (PSC) works, the
reinforcement/un-tensioned steel as the case may be shall consists of the following grades of
reinforcing bars as shown in Table 4.14 are available with local stockists. Before incorporation
into the work, steel shall be got approved by the engineer.
C) Bitumen
Bitumen of viscosity grade VG-10 and VG-30 is available from IOCL, Haldia within the vicinity of
project road, either in bulk tanker or in drums. It is advised that Polymer Modified Bitumen /
Crumb Rubber Bitumen to be used for construction of bituminous layer.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
D) Water
Detailed survey for locating water sources for the use in concrete works and for construction of
road works were carried out in the vicinity of the project road. The most suitable source of
water was which are in close proximity to some points of the alignment of the rivers, along with
numerous nallas and irrigation canals cross the alignment at suitable intervals. However to
facilitate construction works it is always advisable to install wells with due permission from
authority at suitable places for obtaining water for construction purposes.
Lead chart for borrow area materials for NH 29 are provided in Figure 4.1. The same quarry
materials are presented in Figure 4.2.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
LHS RHS
COARSE AGGREGATE QUARRY 60.0 km
AREA (CA-1)
Location: LONGNIT
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
Sub soil investigation has been taken up at bridge locations. The details of sub-soil exploration is
attached in Vol. II – Design Report.
Preliminary hydraulic and hydrological investigations have been carried out for economical
design of drainage structures. The hydrological and hydraulic study for the project includes:
During the reconnaissance survey and further data collection/investigations, the Consultants
approached local residents and different Government Organisations concerned to the project
road to identify the high flood conditions on the project road and on structures. So far as local
enquiry is concerned, there is no history of overtopping along the road. Gradual deposition of
transported bed material in the wake of every monsoon at most of the bridge sites and on their
upstream and downstream sides have resulted in partial blockage in the flow area leading to
afflux and reduced clearance under some of the bridges.
Necessary Hydrological and Hydraulic features such as HFL, river bed condition, bank condition,
land use, scouring have been noted for all the cross-drainage structures.
Based upon data availability, detailed hydrological and hydraulic study of the cross-drainage
structures is being carried out. On initial assessment it has been found that number of cross-
drainage structures is inadequate at some stretches. Adequate numbers of new culverts have
been proposed at those stretches. Details of these new culverts have been presented in Chapter
6 of this report. Additional cross drainage structures would be required in bypass reaches also.
Besides the primary surveys conducted / arranged so far, the Consultants also endeavored to
collect data and information from secondary sources, as necessary for conducting the study.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 4: Engineering survey and Investigations
Some of the secondary data, especially those related to land records are indeed very important,
as besides the various formalities related to land transfer/acquisition, these aspects sometimes
even dictate the alignments of new/widening proposals.
Consultants prepared a list of secondary data to be collected. Most of the data were collected
and few are in process as these are not under direct control of consultant. List of secondary data
collected is mentioned below:
1. Districts Involved
2. Existing road nomenclature
3. Ownership details of road
4. Survey of India open series maps
5. Forest maps and forest shape files
6. Accident data from concerned police stations
7. Fuel sale data from nearby fuel stations
8. Vehicle registration data from RTO office
9. Statistical handbooks
10. SOR, 2018-19
11. Existing ROW information through discussion with concerned officers/site measurements
12. Future proposal of IWAI
13. IOCL underground pipelines
14. Land and building rates
15. High flood level (through local enquiry)
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 5: Traffic Survey and Analysis
CHAPTER 5
5.1 Introduction
Traffic studies and analyses carried out for consultancy services for preparation of detailed
project report for Package II Lot 1 under Bharatmala Pariyojana are presented in this
chapter. The results of analysis will form the inputs for developing capacity augmentation
proposals for the project road, design of intersections, design of the pavement, wayside
amenities and enhancement of other facilities.
NH-29 originates from Nagaon on NH37, connects Daboka, terminating on NH129 at Dimapur.
NH 54 links Silchar, Manipur and Mizoram to NH 29. SH19 links Uttarborbil on NH-29 with
Hojai on NH 54 and Nilbagan. SH36A connects Manja on NH 29 with Diphu. The road network
in the area is shown in Fig 5-1
Based on traffic volume and nature of traffic flow, the project stretch has been divided into
six traffic homogeneous sections as described in Error! Not a valid bookmark self-reference..
In order to capture the traffic flow characteristics and travel pattern along the project road,
the Consultant’s have conducted the following primary surveys
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 5: Traffic Survey and Analysis
Traffic survey stations were selected by the consultants based on an understanding of the
road network and a consideration of the following aspects:
Period of
Sl No. Type of Survey Date of Survey Location
Survey
27.07.18 to 02.08.18
7 days x
Km 62 of NH-29
(8:00 AM) (8:00 24 hrs
AM)
27.07.18 to 02.08.18
Mid Block Volume 7 days x
1 Km 127 of NH-29
Count (8:00 AM) (8:00 24 hrs
AM)
27.07.18 to 02.08.18
7 days x
Km 138.450 of NH-29
(8:00 AM) (8:00 24 hrs
AM)
29.07.18 to 30.07.18
1 day x 24
2 O-D Survey Km 127 of NH-29
(8:00 AM) (8:00 hrs
AM)
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 5: Traffic Survey and Analysis
Period of
Sl No. Type of Survey Date of Survey Location
Survey
31.07.18 to 01.08.18
1 day x 24 Daboka junction
(10:00 AM) (10:00 hrs (Km39+500 of NH-29)
AM)
30.07.18 to
Turning Movement 31.07.18 Howraghat Tinali
1 day x 24
3 Count Survey at junction (Km 85+400 of
(10:00 AM) (10:00 hrs
Intersections NH-29)
AM)
31.07.18 to
01.08.18 1 day x 24 Manja junction (Km
(8:00 AM) (8:00 hrs 128+300 of NH-29)
AM)
29.07.18 to 30.07.18
2 days x
5 Axle load Survey Km 127 of NH 29
(8:00 AM) (8:00 24 hrs
AM)
Source: Consultant’s schedule
Classified traffic volume count survey was conducted at six mid-block locations. The count
was conducted for a full week spread over 7 consecutive days and 24 hours a day. For
carrying out the traffic survey, vehicle classification, as given in Table was adopted.
The survey was conducted using the Video Image Detection ATCC system. Manual counting
by trained enumerators was conducted on a sampling basis for auditing the raw ATCC data.
Trained supervisors were deployed to supervise the traffic surveys. Trained enumerators
supervised by traffic engineers analysed the video images to record the count data at 15-
minute intervals for each vehicle group in each direction of travel.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 5: Traffic Survey and Analysis
The primary objective of conducting origin-destination survey was analysing the travel
pattern of freight and passenger traffic along the study corridor. To assess the influence of
states/ regions, located nearby and those at large distances on the project road traffic, 66
traffic zones were delineated. The road network surrounding the project stretch was studied
in detail in order to arrive at a practical zoning system. Origin- Destination zones and
commoditiy types, with respective code numbers, are presented in Appendix. OD survey was
carried out for 24 hours duration. Roadside interview method was adopted for the survey.
The vehicles were stopped on random sample basis with the help of police, and trained
enumerators interviewed the drivers/ occupants collecting the required information/ data.
The survey was conducted under the guidance of traffic engineers and supervisors.
Information pertaining to trip length, trip purpose, occupancy as applicable for various
vehicle types were recorded during the survey.
The results are useful for identifying the influence area of the project road, estimating the
growth rates of traffic, planning tolling strategies and locating toll plazas on the most viable
sections of the project road.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 5: Traffic Survey and Analysis
The survey was conducted by adopting the Floating car or riding check method. The test
vehicle was driven along the project corridor at the perceptible average speed of traffic
stream. Observers traveling in the test vehicle noted the number of vehicles overtaking the
test vehicle, number of vehicles overtaken by the test vehicle, number of vehicles travelling
in direction opposite to the test vehicle, delay time at different locations, journey time. The
test vehicle run in both directions of the traffic stream.
The survey was carried out at two locations to study the axle load characteristics on the
project road. The survey was conducted in both directions for 48 hours at a stretch. Axle
load pads were installed at the side of the road in both travel directions. Vehicles were
stopped on a sample basis by trained enumerators with the assistance of the District police
and guided to the axle load pad. The vehicle type and wheel loads were recorded in
prescribed format. The survey was monitored by trained supervisors and Engineers.
Data collected from the site were collated, edited and entered into the computer and
analyzed using spread sheet. The various vehicle types having different sizes and
characteristics were converted into a single unit called passenger car unit. Passenger Car
Unit (PCU) values are adopted from Indian Road Congress publication on “Capacity of Roads
in Rural areas”, IRC-64-1990. The PCU values used are presented in Table 5.4.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 5: Traffic Survey and Analysis
The summary of seven day volume counts, in number and PCU, leading to estimation of
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) is provided in Appendices.
For the TVC locations on NH-29, the directional distribution is given in Table 5.5.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 5: Traffic Survey and Analysis
Traffic Composition
Tractor Cycle
0.11% 15.5% TRAFFIC COMPOSITION
Animal Drawn Others
Cycle Rickshaw 0.2% 0.03%
MAV 0.1%
Car
1.0% 22.8%
Tractor with Trailer…
3 Axle
1.1%
2 Axle Taxi
LCV 0.5%
2.5%
6.9%
Standard Bus
3.7%
Mini Bus
0.7%
2 Wheeler
3 Wheeler 32.5%
12.2%
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 5: Traffic Survey and Analysis
Tractor
0.10% TRAFFIC COMPOSITION
Animal Drawn
Others
Cycle Cycle Rickshaw 0.2%
MAV 0.02%
1.0% 15.4% 0.1%
Car
22.8%
Tractor with Trailer
0.1%
3 Axle
1.2%
Taxi
2 Axle 0.5%
2.6% LCV
6.9%
Standard Bus
3.7%
Mini Bus
0.7%
2 Wheeler
32.5%
3 Wheeler
12.2%
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 5: Traffic Survey and Analysis
Tractor
0.09% TRAFFIC COMPOSITION
Animal Drawn
Others
0.1%
Cycle Cycle Rickshaw 0.03%
15.5% 0.1%
MAV
1.0% Car
22.9%
Tractor with Trailer
0.1%
3 Axle
1.2%
Taxi
2 Axle 0.4%
2.6% LCV
6.9%
Standard Bus
3.7%
Mini Bus
0.6%
2 Wheeler
32.6%
3 Wheeler
12.2%
ADT by vehicle type for Km 62 of NH-29, Km 127 of NH-29 and Km 138+450 of NH-29 are
presented in Table 5.6.
Table 5.6 : Average Daily Traffic on Project Road at Km 62 of NH-29, Km 127 of NH-29 and
Km 138+450 of NH-29 (in Numbers)
At Km 138+450 of
Vehicle Type At Km 62 of NH-29 At Km 127 of NH-29
NH-29
Car 1454 1571 1212
Taxi 32 33 23
2 Wheeler 2072 2238 1727
3 Wheeler 777 840 647
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 5: Traffic Survey and Analysis
At Km 138+450 of
Vehicle Type At Km 62 of NH-29 At Km 127 of NH-29
NH-29
Mini Bus 45 48 34
Standard Bus 237 256 198
LCV 440 477 368
2 Axle 162 180 135
3 Axle 73 82 62
MAV 65 71 53
Tractor 7 7 5
Tractor with Trailer 5 5 4
Cycle 984 1063 820
Cycle Rickshaw 4 4 4
Animal Drawn 11 11 7
Others 2 2 2
Total (numbers) 6370 6889 5299
Total (PCU) 6342 6875 5263
Source: Consultant’s analysis
IHMCL data was also collected at a few locations along the project road.
Seasonality factor was determined using the sale of diesel and petrol at petrol pumps
along/near the project road. Seasonality correction factor (SCF) used to calculate the AADT is
presented in Table 5.7.
Table Error! No text of specified style in document.-1: Seasonality Correction Factor (SCF) on NH-29
SCF 1.05 1.01 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01
Tractor
Vehicle Cycle Animal
3-Axle MAV Tractor with Cycle Others
Type Rickshaw cart
Trailer
The AADT obtained for the existing ADT for different vehicle types at Km 62 of NH-29, Km
127 of NH-29, Km 138+450 of NH-29 and are presented in Table 5.8.
Table 5.8 : Average Annual Daily Traffic at Km 62 of NH-29, Km 127 of NH-29 and Km
138+450 of NH-29 (in Numbers)
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 5: Traffic Survey and Analysis
The daily variation of traffic in number and PCU at Km 62 of NH-29, Km 127 of NH-29 and Km
138+450 of NH-29 are presented in Figure 5.6-5.8.
The difference between daily traffic and the ADT in PCU expressed as a percentage of ADT at
the above locations are tabulated in Table 5.9-5.11.
Table 5.9 : Variation between Daily Traffic and ADT (in PCU) at km 62 of NH-29 as
Percentage of ADT
Maximum Variation
Location Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed
-ve (%) +ve (%)
Km 62 of NH
3.4% -3.4% -3.9% 1.3% 10.3% -3.1% -4.6% -4.6% 10.3%
29
Source: Consultant’s analysis
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 5: Traffic Survey and Analysis
Table 5.10 : Variation between Daily Traffic and ADT (in PCU) at km 127 of NH-29 as Percentage
of ADT
Maximum Variation
Location Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed
-ve (%) +ve (%)
Km 127 of 3.5% -3.2% -4.1% 1.4% 10.2% -3.2% -4.4% -4.4% 10.2%
NH-29
Source: Consultant’s analysis
Table 5.11 : Variation between Daily Traffic and ADT (in PCU) at km 138+450 of NH-29 as Percentage of ADT
Maximum Variation
Location Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed
-ve (%) +ve (%)
Km
138+450 3.9% -3.5% -3.9% 1.3% 10.2% -3.7% -4.3% -4.3% 10.2%
of NH-29
Source: Consultant’s analysis
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 5: Traffic Survey and Analysis
6900
6700
Traffic in Vehicles/PCU
6500
6300
Vehicles
6100 PCU
5900
5700
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
Day 4
Day 5
Day 6
Day 7
Day
7800
7600
7400
Traffic in Vehicles/PCU
7200
7000
Vehicles
6800
PCU
6600
6400
6200
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
Day 4
Day 5
Day 6
Day 7
Day
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 5: Traffic Survey and Analysis
5900
5700
Traffic in Vehicles/PCU
5500
5300
Vehicles
5100 PCU
4900
4700
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
Day 4
Day 5
Day 6
Day 7
Day
Travel Pattern
The travel pattern of vehicles along the project corridor was studied. The data collected from
the field was subsequently grouped according to origin and destination of vehicles, which led
to development of the zoning system.
Zoning System
Origin-Destination (OD) analysis is required for designation of the PIA in terms of codified
origin and destination zones. It is thus important to code the trips recorded at site for origin
and destination zones. The zoning, emanating from the understanding of the surrounding
road network and the travel pattern of the vehicles by the consultants, was done in four
levels.
In the first level, all-important towns located along the project stretch were assigned zone
code. Secondly, immediate influence areas of project road were considered and nearby
areas/ towns were defined as separate zones. In next level, all nearby district were grouped
in different zones. Finally, states beyond the influence area were aggregated broadly in
terms of direction and entry point to the project road.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 5: Traffic Survey and Analysis
Commodity Groups
Due consideration was given to include all possible commodities moving along the project
road and to categorize them into homogeneous groups.
The collected data were coded and computerized. Checking of data for incorrect entries and
coding was carried out by cross checking with original field data sheets. The data were also
checked for inconsistencies. The checking included:
After coding of Origin and Destination data, expansion factors were calculated by comparing
the sample size collected for each vehicle type with traffic count data. After calculating
expansion factors, vehicle-wise O-D matrices were developed. On the basis of O-D matrices,
travel pattern of the vehicles moving on the project road was determined.
Commodity Analysis
Table 5.12 : Vehicle wise Commodity Distribution (in Percentage) at km 127 of NH-29
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 5: Traffic Survey and Analysis
Passenger Vehicle
The analysis of passenger vehicles recorded at Km 127 of NH-29 shows that 23% traffic
circulates within Karbi Anglong district (Assam). Traffic between Karbi Anglong and Rest of
Assam is 30%, between Guwahati and Rest of Assam 11%, between Nagaon and Rest of
Assam 15%. Traffic between Dimapur and Assam is 16%.
Between % Share
Between % Share
Within Karbi Anglong 23
Hojai - Rest of Assam 3
Karbi Anglong - Rest of Assam 30
Dimapur - Assam 16
Nagaon - Rest of Assam 15
Guwahati - Rest of Assam 11
Source: Consultant’s analysis
Desire line diagram for Passenger vehicles are presented in Figure 5.9.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 5: Traffic Survey and Analysis
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 5: Traffic Survey and Analysis
Freight Vehicles
Analysis of goods vehicles at km 127 of NH-29 reveals that 25% trips are between Dimapur and
Guwahati and 15% between Diphu and Rest of Assam.
Between % Share
Within Karbi Anglong 9
Karbi Anglong - Dimapur 6
Karbi Anglong - Guwahati 10
Dimapur - Guwahati 25
Dimapur - Rest of Assam (except Karbi Anglong, Guwahati) 16
Diphu - Rest of Assam 15
Nagaon - Rest of Assam 7
Hojai - Rest of Assam 7
Sonitpur - Rest of Assam 2
Source: Consultant’s analysis
Desire line diagram for Goods vehicles are presented in Figure 5.10.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 5: Traffic Survey and Analysis
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 5: Traffic Survey and Analysis
Average occupancy for passenger cars and buses at Km 127 of NH 29 is observed as 3 and 38
respectively. At Km 100 of NH 129 average occupancy of cars and buses is 3 and 29.
The distribution of car passengers by trip purpose at the OD location is shown in Table Error! No
text of specified style in document.-
Table Error! No text of specified style in document.-15: Distribution of Car Passengers by Trip
Purpose at Km 127 of NH-29
Lead Distribution
The lead distribution of vehicles at the OD survey locations is given in Table 5.16.
It is evident that passenger and goods vehicles have different trip characteristics.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 5: Traffic Survey and Analysis
Turning movement count survey was conducted at six major intersections along the project
road. The 24 Hour Classified Traffic Volume Count, Peak Hour Traffic and flow diagrams are
presented in Appendices. Peak hour, peak hour PCUS and vehicles are separately provided in
given in Table 5.17.
The survey was conducted by adopting the Floating car or riding check method. The test vehicle
was driven along the project corridor at the perceptible average speed of traffic stream.
Observers traveling in the test vehicle noted the number of vehicles overtaking the test vehicle,
number of vehicles overtaken by the test vehicle, number of vehicles travelling in direction
opposite to the test vehicle, delay time at different locations, journey time. Analysis of speed-
delay survey data is provided in Appendix-5.1.
Summary of VDF as obtained from axle load survey is presented in Chapter 4 of this report.
Investment priorities are governed by the traffic demand, assessed benefits and cost of the
project. Demand plays the important role, governing which type of facility / infrastructure needs
to be created. A highway project of this nature calls for significant investment. Thus prediction
of traffic demand becomes an important task which necessitates realistic estimation of traffic
growth rates. Accurate estimation of traffic has direct bearing on the viability of the project.
Recognizing this, efforts need to be made to carefully assess all the parameters that help in
predicting the traffic demand. Transport demand changes due to shifts in the pattern of
economic activities in the surrounding regions. Hence, traffic estimation necessitates a preview
of the probable pattern of future growth of the economy. In this project, traffic growth rates
have been estimated using elasticity method as per IRC: 108.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 5: Traffic Survey and Analysis
It is revealed from OD survey that traffic in the project stretch is mainly influenced by Assam and
also by Nagaland to some extent. For establishing traffic growth rates, economic data of Assam
and Nagaland state have been considered. The vehicle registration data of Assam and Nagaland
are presented in Table 5.18.
Growth of traffic on the project road is influenced by the existing development and future
growth prospects of the project influence area (PIA). The time series data of state income NSDP
at constant prices, state population, per-capita income of PIA states have been collected and
analyzed to assess the past performance of the influencing state economies. Table 5.19 and
Table 5.20 depicts these economic indicators.
Indices of Assam
Year
NSDP PCI Population
2012-13 13,251,760 46,247 30,945,000
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 5: Traffic Survey and Analysis
Indices of Assam
Year
NSDP PCI Population
2013-14 13,872,476 49,339 31,319,000
2014-15 14,931,269 52,601 31,693,000
2015-16 16,072,406 56,003 32,069,000
2016-17 17,892,900 60,126 32,132,440
CAGR 7.8 6.8 0.95
Source: of www.indiastat.com, Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, ministry of statistics and
programme implementation and various websites of state governments
Indices of Nagaland
Year
NSDP PCI Population
2013-14 988,690 49,962 2,700,000
2014-15 1,052,220 51,887 2,860,000
2015-16 1,120,253 61,363 2,920,000
CAGR 6.4 10.8 4.0
Source: of www.indiastat.com, Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, ministry of statistics and
programme implementation and various websites of state governments
As discussed earlier, the elasticity approach has been used for determining growth rates of
future traffic. Since time series traffic data on project road is not available, traffic growth rates
and elasticity values are established by using registered vehicles by type as the dependent
variables and economic parameters as independent variables.
The Regression Analysis tool performs linear regression analysis by using the "least squares"
method to fit a line through a set of observations. It analyzes how a single dependent variable is
affected by the values of one or more independent variables. In the present case, registered
vehicles by type are the dependent variables whereas the economic parameters are
independent variables. Regression analysis is carried out by creating econometric models
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 5: Traffic Survey and Analysis
suggested in IRC: 108. The explanatory variable used for different vehicle categories and the
elasticity coefficient for each vehicle class obtained from Regression Analysis are presented in
Table 5.21.
Growth rates of a vehicle class ‘a’ in a particular state ‘i' is calculated from Eqn (a).
where
𝐺𝑎𝑖 = growth rates of vehicle class ‘a’ in state ‘i'
𝑅𝑖 = growth rate of economic indicator in state ‘i'
𝐸𝑎𝑖 = elasticity coefficient for vehicle class ‘a’ in state ‘i'
Traffic growth rates for Assam and Nagaland calculated from Regression Analysis is presented in
Table 5.21.
Table 5.21 : Traffic Growth Rate for Assam and Nagaland calculated from Regression Analysis
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 5: Traffic Survey and Analysis
where 𝐺𝑎𝑝 = growth rate of vehicle class ‘a’ for the project
𝐺𝑎𝑖 = growth rates of vehicle class ‘a’ in state ‘i'
𝐼𝑎𝑖 = influence factor for vehicle class ‘a’ in state ‘i'.
The Influence Factor for different states is estimated from OD survey analysis.
Based on past trend of economic performance, development potential and development thrust
in the region three traffic growth scenarios are envisaged. Traffic growth rates for the most
likely scenario, optimistic scenario and pessimistic scenario are presented in Table 5.22-5.24.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 5: Traffic Survey and Analysis
The slow moving vehicles essentially cater to short haul traffic, meeting localised demand for
transportation. Non–motorised traffic will be gradually replaced by motorised vehicles with
economic improvement. Therefore nonmotorized vehicles are expected to decline by a negative
growth rate of -2% per annum. Growth rates of tractors have been considered at 2% per annum.
A study of the road network reveals that diversion of traffic from or to the project road is not
expected.
No proposed industrial development is reported in the project area. Hence generated traffic is
not considered.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 5: Traffic Survey and Analysis
Total traffic is the sum of normal, diverted and generated traffic. As explained above diverted
and generated traffic are not considered in this project. Hence Total traffic equals Normal
traffic.
Based on the traffic growth rates estimated, the existing traffic volume (expressed in AADT) was
projected for thirty years of operation. The final projected traffic for the project road section for
a particular year is the sum of projected normal traffic using the estimated rate of growth,
diverted traffic and generated traffic. As diverted and generated traffic are not considered in
this project, Total traffic equals Normal traffic.
Table 5.25 presents the total traffic on homogeneous sections for the cardinal years considering
traffic growth rates presented in Table 5.23 (Optimistic Scenario).
Table 5.25 : Total Traffic on Project Road Stretch (in PCU) (Optimistic Scenario)
Table Error! No text of specified style in document.- presents the total traffic on homogeneous
sections for the cardinal years considering traffic growth rates presented in Table 5-24
(Pessimistic Scenario)
Table Error! No text of specified style in document.-26: Total Traffic on Project Road Stretch (in PCU)
(Pessimistic Scenario)
Table 5-27 presents the total traffic on homogeneous sections for the cardinal years considering
traffic growth rates presented in Table 5-22 (Most Likely Scenario)
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 5: Traffic Survey and Analysis
Table Error! No text of specified style in document.-27: Total Traffic on Project Road Stretch (in PCU)
(Most Likely Scenario)
As per IRC SP73-2015, the traffic volume at which upgradation from two lane to four lane will
trigger is presented in Table 5.26.
However, this has been superseded by MoRT&H Circular No. F.No. RW/NH-
33044/37/2015/S&R(R) dated 26.05.16. As per this circular, the traffic at which the upgradation
from two lane to four lane will trigger has been revised as indicated in Table 5.27.
Table 5.34 : Design Service Volume Standards for Four Lane Facility
Traffic at which upgradation to four lane will trigger (in PCU per Day)
Nature of Terrain
Clause No - 4
Plain 10,000
Rolling 8500
Mountainous /
6000
Steep
Source: MoRT&H Circular
5.9 Recommendation
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 5: Traffic Survey and Analysis
Based on traffic projection the year in which upgradation to four lane will trigger for the
respective homogeneous sections is presented in Table 5.28.
Year in which
Traffic in Year of
Traffic in Base upgradation to
Homogeneous Section Existing Chainage Opening (2023) in
Year in PCU four lane will
PCU
trigger
Km 39.5 of NH-29 to Km
HS1 6627 8704 2024
85.4 of NH-29
Km 85.4 of NH-29 to Km
HS2 7184 9438 2023
128.3 of NH-29
Km 128.3 of NH-29 to
HS3 5500 7229 2027
Km 157.4 of NH-29
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 5: Traffic Survey and Analysis
Road Homogeneous
Existing Chainage Recommendation Remarks
Segment Section
HS1 Km 39.5 to Km 85.4 • Major connectivity from Nagaland, Manipur with Guwahati.
HS2 Km 85.4 to Km 128.3 4-Lane with paved • Traffic of 9438 PCU in the year of opening (2022) is close to
NH-29
shoulder 10000 PCU i.e. Design Service Volume Standards for four
HS3 Km 128.3 to Km 157.4 lane facility.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 6: Development Proposal
CHAPTER 6
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
6.1 General
The salient proposals for up-gradation and improvement of the project road are classified
into the following engineering aspects:
The design criteria / method applied for important components of the project are as follows:
Geometric Design : IRC: SP: 84-2019 Manual of Specification & Standards for
Four Laning of Highways with Paved Shoulder
IRC: 73-1980 Geometric design standard for rural highways
IRC and other relevant IRC Codes and guidelines on
geometric design.
New Pavement
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 6: Development Proposal
The Codes and references as per the following table are followed for the Design of the
structures for the project stretch.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 6: Development Proposal
Following points have been considered during preparation of layout at this stage:
The design philosophy basically involves providing suitable horizontal alignment, longitudinal
section, cross section layout, and safety and access control to cater to the fast and
uninterrupted movement of through traffic.
This project is essentially widening the existing standard/sub-standard 2-lane road to 4-lane
with paved shoulder as the alignment follows predominantly existing roads. The geometric
designs are as per recommendations of IRC: SP: 84-2019. The general design standards for
improvement are enumerated in Table 6.1.
Table 6.1 : Geometric Design Standards for Road Works (Plain/Rolling Terrain)
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 6: Development Proposal
The majority of the stretch is proposed with eccentric widening as the 2-lane with paved
shoulder configuration is present almost all along the stretch. The concentric widening is
proposed at the junctions as well as the stretches where the 2-Lane stretch of the bypass is
constructed yet.
Cross-section for the improved facility should be adequate to cater to the traffic expected
over the design period and offer safe and convenient traffic operation at speeds consistent
with the terrain conditions and functional classification of this road.
The cross-sectional elements (lane/shoulder width etc.) are as per standards specified in
geometric design manual. Eight nos. typical cross sections have been envisaged for the
subject project at this stage as mentioned below. These have been prepared on the basis of
site reconnaissance and design guidelines.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 6: Development Proposal
Typical cross sections for the project road are presented in Annexure 6.1 & 6.6. Summary of
cross sections is shown in Table 6.2.
Cross section for bridges, culverts and other structures shall be as per relevant guidelines of
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 6: Development Proposal
IRC: SP-84-2019. In general, full roadway width will be proposed between the outer to outer
face of crash barrier/ parapet for culverts. General 4 or 6 lane configurations for
bridges/culverts/other structures are provided in Table 6.3.
The geometric design has been done within the broad framework of design specifications.
The design speed adopted is 80-100kmph as far as possible, with an allowable maximum
super elevation of 5%, in general. While designing, utmost attempt has been made to avoid
acquisition of residential as well as commercial / religious / historic structures. Details of
horizontal curves proposed along project road is given in Annexure 6.2. Design of horizontal
alignment has been done separately for three sections.
Extra widening for horizontal curves with radius <=300m has been considered as clause 2.7.2
of IRC: SP: 84-2019.
The existing vertical geometry is generally good except at few stretches where inadequate
sight distance has been observed. The longitudinal grade of the project road is generally
within the limits, in general it has been kept as it is with necessary corrections/
strengthening/profile corrective courses. However, at the existing submersible bridge
locations, the vertical profile shall be raised as per codal provisions. Longitudinal gradient of
the proposed profile shall be followed as per prevailing standards. The details of the
proposed curves is presented in Annexure-6.3.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 6: Development Proposal
Proposed alignment basically follows the Dokmoka Bypass. Considering this for future
development, TCS Type-3 have been proposed at Built up locations. The details of which are
provided in in Table 6.4.
Some part of the project road is passing through the reserve forest under Daboka –
Lahorijan section. A list showing the forest stretches is presented in Table 6.5.
6.2.11 Realignments
The proposed alignment is mostly overlapping with the existing with geometric
improvement. Table 6.7 provides the list realignment stretches where the proposed
alignment does not overlap with the existing roads.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 6: Development Proposal
6.3 Drainage
Due consideration has been given to drainage while preparing the design. The cross-sections
incorporating roadside drains have been proposed at various stretches of the highway taking
into account the existing and natural conditions as well as anticipated situation. At super
elevated sections with raised median, rectangular cross median drains have been considered
@10m interval to facilitate drainage from outer carriageway to the inner carriageway.
Earthen toe drain is considered on both sides of the road for all along the stretch. The details
are provided below:
Bridges and other Cross Drainage (CD) structures are the vital infrastructure elements of a
highway network. Maintaining serviceability of bridges and other CD structures,
consequently retaining their level of reliability during their lifetime therefore deserves high
priority from techno-economic considerations. While bridges and structures are integral to
the envisaged development of the Project Road, a comprehensive inventory and condition
surveys is pivotal for an assessment of functional and operational adequacies of the existing
structures. In turn such an assessment forms the basis for zeroing on to rehabilitation/
widening, reconstruction and new-construction requirements.
A detailed condition survey along with visual inspection of the existing structures has been
carried out by the concerned key professionals to assess and ascertain the existing
condition/ characteristics of the bridges and other CD structures. Inventory of bridges has
been prepared based on the condition survey, which consists of recording relevant technical
data for each bridge, such as name, location, length, type of material, carriageway width,
type of structure etc.
The existing road consists of no major bridges, 18 nos. minor bridges and 130 nos. culverts.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 6: Development Proposal
During condition survey of these structures it was observed that all minor bridges are in
good-fair and can be retained. The culverts found are overall in fair condition. Bed
protection is to be provided for the Slab, Box and HP culverts.
Inventory and condition survey report have been prepared with the objective to verify the
form of construction, the dimensions of the structure, the nature and condition of the
structural components, etc. to assess necessary information on which decision would be
made for carrying repairs, strengthening, widening, replacement of the structural part or
rebuilding of the bridge and culverts. Inspection covered not only the condition of individual
components but also the condition of the structure as an entity, especially noting signs of
distress, if any, and its cause to ascertain long-term remedial measures to provide assurance
that the bridge is structurally safe and fit for its designed use.
Inspection was not confined to only searching of defects that are existing, but also included
the range of anticipating problems and recognizing these areas. During and following the
inspection, it was aimed to determine the cause to prevent the repetition and spread of the
deterioration.
Locations Deterioration
All over • General condition of the structure and pre-stressed components in
particular
• Condition of concrete/masonry • Cracks
• Honeycombing • Corrosion signs
• Scaling of concrete • Spalling of concrete
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 6: Development Proposal
Locations Deterioration
• Efflorescence • Condition of construction joints
Top and bottom • Cracks • De-lamination • Blocking of drainage
of deck slab • Worn out wearing coat • Seepage • Corrosion signs
• Leaching • Scaling
• Damage due to accident or any other causes
Steel girders • Pitting • Painting condition • Loose rivet
• Loss of Camber • Deformation • Cracks and bends in
flanges/webs
Support point of • Whether the seating of girder over bearing is uniform
bearings • Condition of anchor bolts, if any
• Spalling/crushing/cracking around bearing support
Webs of girders • Cracks
• Corrosion signs
Junction of slab • Separation
and girder
Drainage spouts • Whether provided • Clogging • Physical condition
• Adequacy of projection of spout on the underside
Joints in precast • Separation
construction • Physical appearance
Expansion joints • Check whether the expansion joint is free to expand and contract
• Hardening/cracking of bitumen filler
• Condition of sliding plates – check for corrosion, damage of welds, etc.
• Debris in joints
• Alignment checking
• Distortion
Elastomeric • Whether the bearing is free to move/rotate in different directions as
Bearing: envisaged in design
• Whether the bearings are fully and evenly seated
• Whether all the bearings are at same level
• Physical condition • Cleanliness • Flattening of bearings
• Splitting/tearing • Bulging • Oxidation
• Non uniform thickness other than that which may be the result of normal
rotation
• Displacement (longitudinal or lateral) from original position
• Whether correct operation of the bearings is prevented or impaired by
structural members built into abutment or pier.
Piers, Abutments, • Tilting and rotation, in any direction • Rocking
Retaining Walls • Cracking, splitting and spalling • Erosion beneath water level
and • Weathering and material deterioration, including lack of pointing for
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 6: Development Proposal
Locations Deterioration
Wing Walls masonry
• Growth of vegetation • Lack of effective drainage
• Internal scour, and leaching of fill • Settlement of fill
Waterway • Width of Waterway • Observed Scour Depth
• Crossing Angle • Evidence of Submergence, if any
• Flow Direction • Any obstruction to the free flow
• Vertical clearance
Parapet/ Railing, Wearing coat, Drainage spout, Utility lines, Floor protection, Approach slab and
Embankment slope protection
• Whether provided • Physical condition • Material type
General Recommendations
Existing bridges having deck width less than 13.5m but in good condition, are proposed for
widening to 13.5m deck width and those having the width more than 13.5m and in good
condition are proposed to be retained with repair & rehabilitation measures to the existing
bridge.
Since the structures are proposed for 4 lanes with shoulder, total width of 2x11m is
proposed for slab culverts & pipe culverts depending upon road cross-section. However, the
existing railing will be replaced with RCC crash barrier by chipping the edge of deck and
exposing the reinforcement and then casting the RCC crash barrier in case of slab culverts.
Culverts: -
• The culverts proposed to be reconstructed are mainly for very poor structural
condition in case of slab or arch culverts by Box culverts
• For slab culverts widening is to be done up to the overall width of the road with Box
culvert of same span.
• All existing Hume Pipe culverts having vent opening less than 0.9 m shall be replaced
with 1.2m diameter pipes.
• All new construction/reconstruction of Hume Pipe culverts is to be done by 1.2m
diameter pipe.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 6: Development Proposal
Rehabilitation measures for existing bridges have been recommended aiming at improving its
structural adequacy and life span of the bridge. The basic measures taken into repair and
rehabilitation are listed below:
a) Crack Repairs
For cracks smaller than 0.5 mm, high thermo set monomers such as Monopol of Krishna
Conchem or equivalent are recommended. For crack between 0.5 mm to 1.0 mm, low
viscosity epoxy injects such as ‘KP 250/HP 259 of Krishna Conchem or equivalent is
recommended. For the cracks more than 1 mm, polymer modified cement grout Rendroc –
RG of Fosroc Chemical or equivalent is recommended.
b) Spalling
For minor distress, repair of concrete is carried out with anticorrosive polymer modified
mortar such as ‘Monoband 2000 of Krishna Conchem or equivalent.
c) Guniting
At places where large area of soffit of deck slab (RCC) is distressed and shows spalling of
concrete, corroded and exposed reinforcement, guniting is recommended with the help of
Sicken – Gunit
No Major Bridges are falling within the 2 (Two) sections considered for this report.
Total 3 nos. minor bridges have been considered for the project road. In which all 3 nos. are
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 6: Development Proposal
proposed to be retained with widening and repair. New 2 lane Bridge to be constructed
alongside the existing bridges.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 6: Development Proposal
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 6: Development Proposal
6.4.3 Culverts
Total 45 nos. culverts have been considered for the project road as mentioned below:
Section – 3 : 45 Nos. of Culverts
Section-3: From Km 65+923 (near Dokmoka) to Km 80+930 (near Loring Thepi Village)
Under Under
U/C -
Construction Construction
Improvement schemes for these culverts have been decided on the basis of inventory,
condition survey and proposed geometry. Details of widening and retain & repair for the
culverts are provided in Table 6.10.
Table 6.10 : Details of Culverts with Retain and Repair Plus New 2-Lane
Section 3
1 27+596 66+120 Pipe Culvert 1x1.2 Pipe Culvert 1x1.2 New 2Lane
2 27+969 66+492 Pipe Culvert 1x1.2 Pipe Culvert 1x1.2 New 2Lane
3 28+150 66+663 Pipe Culvert 2x0.9 Pipe Culvert 2x0.9 New 2Lane
4 28+490 67+013 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 New 2Lane
5 28+719 67+242 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 New 2Lane
6 29+171 67+695 Pipe Culvert 2x0.9 Pipe Culvert 2x0.9 New 2Lane
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 6: Development Proposal
7 29+339 67+863 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 New 2Lane
8 29+829 68+353 Slab Culvert 1x5.6 Box Culvert 1x5.6 New 2Lane
9 30+122 68+644 Slab Culvert 1x2.6 Box Culvert 1x2.6 New 2Lane
10 30+298 68+820 Slab Culvert 1x2.9 Box Culvert 1x2.9 New 2Lane
11 33+528 72+053 Pipe Culvert 2x0.9 Pipe Culvert 2x0.9 New 2Lane
12 33+835 72+359 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 New 2Lane
13 34+687 73+213 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 New 2Lane
14 34+925 73+452 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 New 2Lane
15 35+063 73+590 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 New 2Lane
16 35+222 73+749 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 New 2Lane
17 35+420 73+947 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 New 2Lane
18 35+579 74+106 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 New 2Lane
19 35+742 74+269 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 New 2Lane
20 35+793 74+320 Pipe Culvert 2x0.9 Pipe Culvert 2x0.9 New 2Lane
21 35+919 74+446 Pipe Culvert 2x0.9 Pipe Culvert 2x0.9 New 2Lane
22 36+067 74+593 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 New 2Lane
23 36+090 74+617 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 New 2Lane
24 36+280 74+807 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 New 2Lane
25 36+405 74+931 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 New 2Lane
26 36+845 75+371 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 New 2Lane
27 37+294 75+820 Pipe Culvert 1x1.2 Pipe Culvert 1x1.2 New 2Lane
28 37+728 76+254 Slab Culvert 1x4.8 Box Culvert 1x4.8 New 2Lane
29 38+133 76+660 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 New 2Lane
30 38+420 76+946 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 New 2Lane
31 38+852 77+378 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 New 2Lane
32 39+002 77+528 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 New 2Lane
33 39+160 77+685 Pipe Culvert 1x1.2 Pipe Culvert 1x1.2 New 2Lane
34 39+863 78+387 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 New 2Lane
35 40+033 78+557 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 New 2Lane
36 41+718 80+240 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 New 2Lane
37 42+080 80+601 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 New 2Lane
38 42+238 80+760 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 New 2Lane
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 6: Development Proposal
Section 3
1 30+511 69+033 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 New 4Lane
2 31+353 69+876 Pipe Culvert 4x1.2 Pipe Culvert 4x1.2 New 4Lane
3 31+690 70+213 Pipe Culvert 1x1.2 Pipe Culvert 1x1.2 New 4Lane
4 32+422 70+945 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 New 4Lane
5 33+078 71+600 Pipe Culvert 2x0.9 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 New 4Lane
6 33+185 71+707 Pipe Culvert 1x1.2 Pipe Culvert 1x1.2 New 4Lane
7 39+481 78+007 Pipe Culvert 2x0.9 Pipe Culvert 2x1.2 New 4Lane
6.4.4 Underpasses
No underpasses has been proposed in this section. Details of these underpasses are
provided in Table 6.12.
Span
Design Total
Sl Type of Arrangement Overall
Chainage Length Structure Type
No. Underpasses (Nos. x Length in Width (m)
(km) (m)
m)
Section 3
Nil
6.4.6 Flyover
6.4.7 Interchanges
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 6: Development Proposal
The proposed project road will form a no. of intersections with existing roads. 6 nos. of
major intersections shall have to be developed. Improvement of these intersections has
been thought off with minimum of land acquisition. However, proper acceleration and
deceleration lanes have been considered with proper traffic signage. In general, standard
codal provisions have been followed for design of these intersections. Detail layouts are
provided in Drawing Volume. There is no major intersections have been proposed. Besides,
there are 18nos. of minor intersections along the project road which shall be operated as
normal left-in and left-out principle. Improvement proposals of major and minor
intersections are provided in Table 6.13.
Design
Road Type of Improvemen
Sl No. Chainage Type Side Remarks
Segment Intersection t Proposals
(km)
Section-3
NIL
Design
Type of Improvement
Sl. No. Chainage Type Side
Intersection Proposals
(km)
Section 3
1 68+030 Minor 3 legged Right At Grade
2 68+135 Minor 3 legged Left At Grade
3 70+620 Minor 3 legged Right At Grade
4 71+030 Minor 3 legged Left At Grade
5 71+410 Minor 4 legged Both At Grade
6 71+835 Minor 3 legged Left At Grade
7 72+550 Minor 3 legged Left At Grade
8 72+790 Minor 3 legged Left At Grade
9 73+020 Minor 3 legged Left At Grade
10 74+950 Minor 3 legged Left At Grade
11 75+125 Minor 4 legged Both At Grade
12 75+200 Minor 3 legged Right At Grade
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 6: Development Proposal
Design
Type of Improvement
Sl. No. Chainage Type Side
Intersection Proposals
(km)
13 75+750 Minor 3 legged Left At Grade
14 76+140 Minor 3 legged Left At Grade
15 77+160 Minor 3 legged Right At Grade
16 77+660 Minor 3 legged Left At Grade
17 78+850 Minor 3 legged Right At Grade
18 78+880 Minor 3 legged Left At Grade
6.6.1 General
The pavement existing on the project stretch is flexible in nature. The project envisages new
Two Lane with Paved Shoulder as well as Four Lanes with Paved Shoulder configuration. The
general design Procedure for the flexible pavement for the proposed road as new
construction of whole stretch as per the guidelines of IRC: 37-2018 – “Guidelines for the
design of Flexible Pavements”.
New pavement design is based on the design traffic (MSA) and the subgrade strength
(soaked CBR).
Introduction
The flexible pavements are usually referred as a layered structure comprising generally
bituminous surface like Bituminous Concrete (BC) and Dense Bituminous Macadam (DBM),
Wet Mix Macadam (WMM) base and Granular Sub-Base (GSB) course of finite thickness,
resting on subgrade of minimum thickness of 500 mm. The thickness design of these layers
principally depends on the subgrade CBR and the traffic loads that the pavement has to
carry during its design life. Ideally, the flexible pavement is built to such a depth that
stresses on any given layer should not cause unwarranted rutting, fatigue, shoving, or other
differential movements which may result in an uneven wearing surface. The chief function
of the surfacing course is to provide a smooth wearing surface, resistant to traffic. However,
the wearing course can provide some shearing resistance to the base structure and some
added resistance to deformation.
Base courses are usually layers of aggregates that must possess high resistance to
deformation in order to withstand the higher pressures imposed by wheel loads. High –
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 6: Development Proposal
quality processed aggregates are usually required, which also provide good internal
drainage sub bases and generally made up of locally available aggregates, satisfying codal
specification/requirements.
The design methodologies widely used for the flexible pavement design are Indian Road
Congress (IRC) method, AASHTO methods and Asphalt Institute Method. For this project
latest IRC (IRC:37-2018) method is used for designing the flexible pavement. The brief about
the method is given below.
It gives pavement design catalogue for subgrade CBR values ranging from 5% to 15 % and
eight levels of design traffic ranging from 5 to 50 MSA. The pavement compositions given in
the design catalogues are relevant to Indian conditions, materials and specifications. For
higher traffic values, the pavement layer thicknesses are worked out using IITPAVE
software.
IRC: 58-2015 “Guidelines for the design of plain jointed rigid pavements for highways” gives
the design of rigid pavements and adopted for designing the rigid pavement for
carriageway.
IRC: 37-2018 method is adopted for the design which is based on the empirical – analytical
approach, and provides catalogues for design of flexible pavements. The design inputs
required for pavement design are explained as follows.
Design Theory
The pavement design method is based on elastic response of the pavement to traffic
stresses (i.e. each of the materials in the pavement structure behaves in an elastic manner).
The materials in the pavement are characterized by parameters whose values are
determined from field and laboratory testing. The method assumes that failure will not
occur as a result of permanent deformation of granular or bound materials (and this
assumption will be valid as long as good construction procedures are followed, and the
pavement is not subjected to very high wheel loads such as can be caused by a very heavily
overloaded vehicle). The method also assumes that loss of pavement serviceability can occur
due to:
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 6: Development Proposal
• fatigue of bitumen bound or cemented layers due to repetitions of tensile strains at the
bottom of such layers; and/or
• Permanent deformation of the sub-grade due to repeated vertical compressive strains
induced in the sub-grade
The critical locations for pavement failure are therefore the bottom of bitumen bound layers
(where tensile strains occur) and the top of the sub-grade (where compressive strains
occur).
The base course and sub-grade are structural elements of the pavement. In conjunction with
the overlying bituminous surface, their purpose is to distribute traffic wheel loads over the
whole foundation. To perform this function, we build the base course and sub-grade with
the necessary internal strength properties.
Bituminous pavement layers have both tensile and compressive strength to resist internal
stresses. For example, Figure 6.1 shows how wheel load (W) slightly deflects the pavement
structure, causing both tensile and compressive stresses within the pavement.
Figure 6.1: Pavement Deflection Results in Tensile and Compressive Stresses in Pavement Structure
• Traffic to be served initially and over the design service life of the pavement
• Strength and other pertinent properties of the prepared sub-grade
• Strength and other influencing characteristics of the materials available or chosen for
the layers (or courses) in the total pavement structure
• Special factors such free swelling property of existing soil
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 6: Development Proposal
Step 1: To find out initial traffic in the year of completion of construction in terms of the
number of the number of commercial vehicles per day (CVPD)
Step 2: To determine traffic growth rate factor by studying the past trends of traffic growth
Step 3: Design life of Pavement
Step 4: To find out Vehicle Damage Factor to convert the number of commercial vehicles of
different axle loads and axle configuration to the number of standard axle load
repetition. It may be obtained by conducting axle load survey at site.
Step 5: To find out lane distribution factor of traffic over the carriageway
Step6: To determine design traffic in cumulative number of standard axles (msa) by the
following formula mentioned below:
N= [365 x {(1+r)n-1]/r}] x A x D x F
Where,
N = Cumulative number of standard axles to be catered for in the design in terms of msa
A = Initial traffic in the year of completion of construction in terms of number of
commercial vehicles per day
D = Lane Distribution Factor
n = Design life in years
r = Annual growth rate of commercial vehicles
F = Vehicle damage factor
Step 7: To determine total pavement thickness and crust composition by charts/graphs with
respect to CBR and cumulative number of standard axles.
Methodology flow chart for the design of new Flexible pavement has been shown in Figure
6.2 below.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 6: Development Proposal
Design Life
Figure 6.2 : Methodology Flow Chart for Design of New Flexible Pavement
MSA Calculation
MSA calculation has been presented in Annexure 6.4 for Daboka-Lahorijan section.
Adopted design life for pavement design has been considered for 15 years period.
The lane distribution factor adopted for the project road is as given under:
• Dual Two Lane carriageway roads: 75 percent of number of Commercial vehicles in each
direction as per IRC-37-2018.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 6: Development Proposal
Design CBR
The subgrade CBR for design has been considered as 8.0%. Subgrade of 500 mm thickness is
required as an integral part of the pavement structure. Details of msa calculated for flexible
pavement design are provided in Table 6.14for Daboka-Lahorijan Section.
VDF values for LHS of the Daboka – Lahorijan stretch for 2-Axle Trucks, 3-Axle Trucks, MAVs,
LCVs and Buses are 6.93, 9.46, 13.07, 2.40 and 1.92 respectively.
VDF values for RHS of the Daboka – Lahorijan stretch for 2-Axle Trucks, 3-Axle Trucks, MAVs,
LCVs and Buses are 2.59, 3.52, 5.97, 1.17 and 1.07 respectively.
Traffic Surveys were conducted at Km. 62, Km. 127 and Km. 138.45 of the Daboka –
Lahorijan road (NH-29) and the total stretch is to be developed as 4-Lane Dual Carriageway
road. The details of the msa calculated are presented below:
Table 6.14A
msa for 4-Lane Dual Carriageway on LHS from Daboka to Lahorijan (NH-29)
Location msa Adopted msa
Km 62 17.21
Km 127 18.95 20 msa
Km 138.45 14.34
As all the calculated msas are below 20, the Design msa is considered as 20.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 6: Development Proposal
Table 6.14B
msa for 4-Lane Dual Carriageway on RHS from Daboka to Lahorijan (NH-29)
Location msa Adopted msa
Km 62 7.59
Km 127 8.34 20 msa
Km 138.45 6.32
As all the calculated msas are below 20, the Design msa is considered as 20.
Pavement layer thicknesses based on inputs mentioned above is given in Table 6.15. The
GSB-II layer will be extended till earthen shoulder to facilitate of proper drainage in the
pavement structure. The design has been carried out as per Plate-6 of IRC:37-2018.
Overlay design has been carried out based on the results of the FWD Tests. The Summary of
the Analysis and selection of the 15th percentile moduli of in-service layers are presented in
Annexure 4.1 under Chapter 4.
The Analysis is carried out for the stretch. The 15th Percentile Moduli of the in-service layers
and the average existing pavement thicknesses are presented in Table 6.16.
Table 6.16 : 15th Percentile Moduli of the In-Service Layers and Average Existing Pavement
Thicknesses
Considering the above data, the remaining fatigue life and rutting life of the pavement are
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 6: Development Proposal
From the above results it is evident that the existing pavement crust is not sufficient to carry
the corresponding design traffic. Hence considering the bituminous overlay the results
obtained are presented in Table 6.18.
Various protection works have been considered as per design requirement as well as from
safety point of view as mentioned below:
Several towns, villages and settlements are abutting the project corridor and buses shall be
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 6: Development Proposal
one of the major mode of passenger traffic movement along the corridor. It is imperative to
provide bus bays in order to eliminate the conflict between buses and other moving vehicles
as well as to ensure safety of passengers boarding and alighting. Proposed bus bays have
been kept sufficiently away from the intersections to avoid traffic congestion. Total 7 nos. of
bus bays have been considered for the section.
6.8.5 Illumination
Highway illumination shall be considered at various location as per clause 12.3 of IRC: SP: 84-
2014. Details are considered as follows:
A. Double Arm Poles –major intersections, bus bays and truck lay byes
B. High Mast Poles – Considered at major intersections and truck lay byes.
The objective of a high-speed facility includes providing safe, efficient and economic
movement of motorized through traffic with comfort and pleasing environment during the
journey. This requires certain miscellaneous provisions for traffic guidance and safety.
However, it is evident that after implementation of the project, high speed environment will
make the areas more accident-prone unless proper safety controls are exercised. The
Consultants propose to rectify any geometric and engineering deficiency existing along the
critical stretches. The safety measures and devices as proposed are described below:
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 6: Development Proposal
For notification of road features and also for safety and guidance of the road users, the
project road will be provided with all the necessary traffic control and safety devices. These
include:
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 6: Development Proposal
Pedestrian Facilities
Speed Breakers
Speed breakers shall be provided on minor cross-roads to alert the drivers and control the
speed of vehicles approaching the project road, forming priority junctions, and these shall be
constructed as per IRC: 99-1988. The speed breaker will be provided at about 10m into the
cross-road from the project road. Another speed breaker will precede this at 100-120m.
Appropriate warning signs “hump ahead” will be provided in advance to caution the drivers.
(i) The aim of landscaping will be conservation of existing natural or manmade features
e.g. ponds, historical buildings and scenic vistas along the highway.
(ii) Landscaping will address the issue of drainage to ensure minimum disturbance to
the natural drainage and at the same time ensure protection of natural surfaces
from erosion.
(iii) Proper landscaping will be provided for highway Alignment, to fit-in with
surroundings for pleasing appearance, reducing adverse environmental effects such
as air pollution, noise pollution and visual intrusion.
(iv) Landscaping will include stabilization of embankment by pitching and/or turfing/
plantation. The treatment of embankment slopes along the highway will be as per
recommendations of IRC:56–1974, depending upon soil type involved.
(v) Trees, their spacing and arrangement in different situations will be as per IRC:21–
1979 and IRC:SP:66–1976.
(vi) Compensatory afforestation as per applicable rules.
Proposed ROW of 42m is considered for the road sections in rural area. In built-up area 47m PROW
is considered. In forest area, to minimize the land acquisition, 35.5m PROW and at the approach of
elephant underpasses, 42.5m PROW are considered. In approach of grade separator 60m ROW is
considered.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 6: Development Proposal
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
CHAPTER 7
ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING
7.1 INTRODUCTION
Stretches Description
Strech-1 Daboka – Manja (NH-29)
Strech-2 Manja- Lahorijan (NH-29)
Strech-3 Lahorijan – Khatkhati (NH-129)
Strech-4 Numaligar- Khatkhati (NH 129)
Strech-5 Khatkhati – Chumukademia (Dimapur Bypass)
As mentioned earlier, the project road has 5 (Five) stretches as below:
i) The Daboka – Manja stretch under Nagaon – Dimapur Economic Corridor starts at
Daboka – Sutargaon More (26o6’56.85”N, 92o52’28.97”E) which is a junction of the
project road i.e. NH-29 (Old NH-36) and Nagaon - Lumding/ Silchar road. The chainage of
Detailed Project Report Page 1 of 53
Project: Consultancy Services for Preparation of DPR under Bharatmala Pariyojana
(Lot-1: Package II) [Tentative Length 217.1 km] Date: June 2020
Section-3: Km 65+923 – Km 80+930 Revision: R0
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
the start point is Km 39+500 of NH-29. The stretch runs along South-East direction and
ends at the junction (Manja Market) of the Project Road with Manja – Diphu – Lumding
Road at existing Km 128+300 of NH-29 (25o58’14.79”N, 93o26’14.79”E). The Length of
the stretch is about 88.8 Km.
ii) The Manja – Lahorijan stretch under Nagaon – Dimapur Economic Corridor starts at
existing Km 128+300 (25o58’14.79”N, 93026’14.79”E) and ends at Lahorijan
(25o55’15.60”N, 93043’49.75”E), the outskirts of Dimapur. The end point is about 2 Km
towards North from the City Tower (Junction of NH-29 and NH-129). The stretch passes
mainly forest stretches and partly through the vicinity of Marat Wild Life Sanctuary. The
Length of the stretch is about 40.1 Km.
iii) The Numaligarh – Khatkhati stretch under Numaligarh – Dimapur Economic Corridor
starts at the Junction (26037’51.90”N, 93043’38.58”E) of NH-129 and NH-37 at
Numaligarh and ends at Khatkhati (25057’19.36”N, 93044’8.86”E) about 7 Km towards
North from the City Tower in Dimapur. The Length of the stretch is about 102 Km.
This report includes the road sections as mentioned below from the Stretch -1&2 in Table
7.1.
Section-3: From Km 65+923 (near Dokmoka) to Km 80+930 (near Loring Thepi Village)
Segment wise variation of lengths from RFP document is provided in Table 7.2 as follows:
Table 7.1: Variation in Lengths of Different Segments from RFP Document
Stretches RFP Ground
Node
as per Description Length Length Remarks
Reference
RFP (km) (Km)
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
Project screening in EIA is the first step in the initial assessment of the possible environmental
impacts of the proposed project. The purpose of the environmental screening is to identify if the
proposed project requires an EIA through the elimination of irrelevant environmental issues and the
forcing on the attention at the planning stages on potentially significant issues. The scope of the
screening studies includes:
Consideration of biophysical and socio-economic issues and the relevant legislative
framework
iv. Further study is necessary to determine the level of EIA required (often called an
1
Initial Environmental Examination (IEE).
The screening exercise establishes the basis for scoping, which identifies the key impacts to be
studied and establishes terms of reference for an EIA. Typical environmental screening procedure is
illustrated in the Figure 7.2 below:
1 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) as defined by several multilateral-funding agencies such as The World Bank (WB),
The Asian Development Bank (ADB) and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is “a preliminary
attempt to evaluate environmental impacts in order to determine whether a full-scale environmental impact assessment is
needed. Also called Initial Environmental Investigation (IEI), partial EIA or "Preliminary EIA".
In Accordance to USAID “Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) is the first review of the reasonably foreseeable effects of
a proposed action on the environment. Its function is to provide a brief statement of the factual basis for a Threshold
Decision as to whether an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement will be required.” (Reference:
USAID Automated Directives System - ADS - Chapters 200-204)
Source:https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1865/204.pdf)
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
Provide environmental direction early in the project; Alert the proponent and design team of
any potential environmental concerns that must be addressed in detail in the EIA; and
Potential positive and/or negative environmental impacts during the life cycle of the project,
including construction and operation, that shall be analyzed in detail in the EIA;
Potential catastrophic pollution releases (e.g., Solid & Hazardous waste, etc.) to be analyzed
in detail in the EIA; and
The survey methodology and techniques to be used in the EIA process.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
The planned road development for the aforesaid 02 sections of the road stretche-1 under Lot-I of
Package-II in the state of Assam may have adverse environmental impacts on the immediate
surrounding and ambient environment, an Environmental Screening (ES) Report is prepared with a
view to properly categorizing the project and identifying and prioritizing environmental issues to be
scoped in and scoped out during the detailed EIA Stage.
The important environmental component studied during the Environmental Screening Stage are
given in Table 7.3 as follows:
Several guideline documents have described screening in different ways. The overall approach for
the environmental screening has taken into account:
Preparation of baseline;
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
The scoping process is designed to ensure that the environmental studies provide all the relevant
information on:
The impacts of the project, in particular focusing on the most important impacts;
• Task 3: Field investigation and data collection for environmental screening and
scoping;
• Task 6: Reporting
The Project’s EIA have been discussed reviewed and discussed by the VSPL’s thematic
experts. Thereafter methodology and approach for project execution has thoroughly been
discussed.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
The project documents (RFP document, project alignment and other relevant documents)
collected from the client have been reviewed to have better understanding of the project
objectives. These documents guided in the impact screening. All the Environmental Rules
and Regulations enacted by MoEF&CC have been reviewed alongside other national and
multilateral funding agency policies formulated by Asian Development Bank and World Bank
safeguard policies relevant to Environmental Impact Assessment. In addition, relevant
baseline data on the physical, biological and social environment have also been reviewed
and findings incorporated into the report.
Field data gathering checklist: Field data gathering checklist (for Air, Noise, Water Soil &
Socio-economic etc.) have been developed by the project team (thematic experts). The data
gathering checklist have been used to capture all relevant information on environmental
features, Environmental Sensitive Locations Wildlife flora and fauna (if any) etc.
Data Entry Team: Date entries into the computers have been done by experienced data
entry personnel and data entered have been re-validated by the thematic experts to ensure
correctness of the data as per the information and data collected during site visit such as
GPS Coordinates, Noise Measurements, nearby commercial and industrial facilities, nearest
settlements, flora and fauna, water sources etc. In the context of the planned project,
important parameters identified in the field are grouped into three categories:
Physical Environment (Air Quality, Noise Quality, Waste generation and disposal,
Water Resources, Soil Erosion)
The data have been gathered to provide a reliable basis on which to predict effects likely to arise
from the proposed project.
Task 4: Environmental Screening (ES) for Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
The ES identified the types of environmental impacts to be investigated and reported in the
environmental impact assessment. The environmental topics that will be considered within the ES
report are: air quality, noise and vibration, climate & meteorology, hydrology & draining, waste
(solid, liquid & hazardous) management, ecology, soil/land contamination, socioeconomic, cultural
heritage; For each topic, the likelihood of significant effects arising has been considered in terms of
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
direct and indirect effects during construction and direct and indirect effects during operation and
maintenance. The important Environmental Components considered in the Environmental Screening
At about 23% stretches the alignment passes through green field areas. For the balance reaches,
where the alignment overlaps with the existing roads, eccentric widening has been followed with the
objective to use the existing ROW to the maximum extent possible. At few locations, concentric
widening also proposed to allow use of existing crust. However, minor realignments have been
incorporated at few locations for geometric correction. Attempts have been made to avoid
realignments at built up locations.
This project is essentially widening the existing standard/sub-standard 2-lane road to 4-lane with
paved shoulder as the alignment follows predominantly existing roads. The geometric designs are as
per recommendations of IRC: SP: 84-2019. The general design standards for improvement are
enumerated in Table 7.4.
Table 7.3: Geometric Design Standards for Road Works (Plain/Rolling Terrain)
Sl No. Attributes Geometric Design Standards
Design Speed
1 Plain and Rolling Terrain Ruling: 100 kmph
(Cross slope of the ground upto 25per cent) Minimum: 80 kmph
For four lane: 2 x 7.0m with 0.5 m Kerb
2 Carriageway Width
shyness at either side
Width of Shoulder
3 a) Paved Shoulder 2 x 2.5 m
b) Earthen Shoulder 1.5 m
4 Footpath width at built-up areas 2 x 1.5 m drain cum footpath
Camber
5 a) Carriageway 2.5%
b) Shoulder 3.0%
Maximum limited to 7.0% (for Radius less
than Desirable minimum)
6 Maximum and Minimum Super-elevation
Minimum limited to 5% (for Radius more
than Desirable minimum)
Minimum Radius of Horizontal Curves
7 Desirable Minimum: 400m
a) Plain and rolling Terrain
Absolute Minimum: 250m
8 Sight Distances for Various Speeds 180m – 360m
9 Longitudinal Gradient
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
• Will provide easy accessibility for school, medical facilities, etc. for the nearby villages
even in the rainy season
• Project Road would bring about all-round development activities in the region, such as
movement of people and goods, agriculture, commerce, education, health and social
welfare, or even maintenance of law and order and security
The need of the project is to create a 4-lane partially access controlled facility with provision of at
grade intersections, grade separators with/without ramps etc. as appropriate/necessary, within the
stipulated Right-of-Way by improving the existing single/two lane road and/or developing a new 4-
lane road in case of locations with poor geometry and dense settlements to a standard 4-lane road
with paved shoulder. To this end, land to the extent necessary will be acquired. Further, the
development cost may be recouped, to the extent practicable, from collection of tolls from users of
the improved facility. As such, the improvement schemes for the project road should be as
economical as possible consistent with the functional requirements and amenable for quick
implementation without much gestation delays.
A. Development Proposal
The salient proposals for up-gradation and improvement of the project road are classified
into the following engineering aspects:
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
• In general, in this section of proposed stretch follows existing Sections except the bypass
proposed (Dokmoka).
• Widening of the project road based on traffic capacity/requirement.
• Improving the horizontal geometry of the existing road based on the design standards as
per IRC: SP: 84-2019
• Design of new pavement for widening and realignment of the existing road.
• Provision of overlay at strengthening stretches.
• Improvement of all major and minor intersections.
• Rehabilitation and widening of the existing structures including bridges, culverts etc. and
design of new ones as per requirement.
• Provision of comprehensive road furniture for complete road safety measures.
C. Service Road
Service Road with Footpath have been considered at Major Built up locations & VUP approaches as
mentioned below.
Cross section for bridges, culverts and other structures shall be as per relevant guidelines of IRC:SP-
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
84-2019. In general, full roadway width will be proposed between the outer to outer face of crash
barrier/ parapet for culverts. General 4 or 6 lane configurations for bridges/culverts/other structures
are provided in Table 7.6.
Due consideration has been given to drainage while preparing the design. The cross-sections
incorporating roadside drains have been proposed at various stretches of the highway taking into
account the existing and natural conditions as well as anticipated situation. In general unlined
trapezoidal drains have been considered on either side of road. Lined rectangular uncovered RCC
drains have been considered for cut section as well as approaches of major bridges. Covered
rectangular drain sections have been proposed in urban stretches as well as approaches of
underpasses. At super elevated sections with raised median, rectangular cross median drains have
been considered. All the drains shall discharge into the nearest outfall. At high embankment
stretches (where embankment height more than 3.0m) chute drains with energy dissipation basins
have been proposed @ 5m interval.
E. Land Acquisition
Proposed ROW of 42m is considered for the road sections in rural area. In built-up area 47m PROW
is considered. In forest area, to minimize the land acquisition, 35.5m PROW and at the approach of
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
elephant underpasses, 42.5m PROW are considered. In approach of grade separator 60m ROW is
considered.
F. Intersection Design
All junctions have been studied thoroughly with respect to traffic volume and geometric design. The
important junctions leading to settlements have been identified and proper junction layouts
(including road marking, and traffic signs) shall be applied as per IRC-SP: 41-1994.
Traffic control devices and road safety features, including Traffic Signs, Road Markings, Road lighting
& Crash Barriers are proposed and designed as per relevant IRC codes and standards.
7.5.1 Introduction
Project road under study is mostly lies in hilly region and has been upgraded for development. Any
developmental activity has both adverse as well as beneficial impact on surrounding environment.
The present report is an effort for scrutinised the applicable environmental laws and legislative
framework under Ministry of Environment Forests & Climate Change, Govt. of India. This section
elaborates on the various clearance requirements for the project from the State Government and
MoEF&CC, GoI.
The Government of India has formulated various policy guidelines; acts and regulations aimed at
protection and enhancement of environmental resources. The following Table 7.7 surmises the
existing legislations pertaining to the project, the various clearances required for the project.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
Applicability Implementing /
S. No. Law / Regulation / Guidelines Relevance Reason for Application
Yes / No Responsible Agency
enforce water quality and construction
effluent standards, monitor
water quality, prosecute
offenders, and issue licenses for
construction / operation of
certain facilities.
Empowers SPCB to set and
Consent required for establishing
The Air (Prevention and Control monitor air quality standards and State Pollution Control
5 Yes and operation of batching, hot mix
of Pollution) Act. 1981 to prosecute offenders, excluding Board
plants and crushers
vehicular air and noise emission.
Construction machineries and
Noise Pollution (Regulation And Standards for noise emission for State Pollution Control
6 Yes vehicles to conform to the standards
Control) Act, 1990 various land uses Board
for construction
Conservation and definition of
Part of road packages passes
forest areas. Diversion of forest Forest Department,
7 Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 Yes through the Daboka, Sildharampur,
land follows the process as laid MoEF&CC
Longhit and Nambor Reserve Forests
by the Forest conservation Act.
The project area is located in MoEF&CC, State
Coastal Regulatory Zone
8 Protect and manage coastal areas No landlocked region and there is no Department of
Notification, 1991
designated coastal zone. Environment
Protection of wild life in NBWL, SBWL & Chief
9 Wild Life Protection Act, 1972 No -
sanctuaries and National Park Wild Life Warden
Ancient Monuments and To protect and conserve cultural No notified archaeological Archaeological Survey
10 No
Archaeological sites & Remains and historical remains found. monument is located in the of India, State Dept. of
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
Applicability Implementing /
S. No. Law / Regulation / Guidelines Relevance Reason for Application
Yes / No Responsible Agency
Act 1958 proximity of the planned project Archaeology
road
Empowers State Transport All vehicles used for construction
State Motor Vehicles
11 The Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 Authority to enforce standards Yes will need to comply with the
Department
for vehicular pollution. provisions of this act.
Sets out the regulations as to
The Explosives Act (& Rules) regards the use of explosives and New quarrying operation may Chief Controller of
12 Yes
1884 (1983) precautionary measures while require blasting Explosives
blasting & quarrying
Protection to the general public
Public Liability and Insurance Hazardous materials like Bitumen State Pollution Control
13 from accidents due to hazardous Yes
Act,1991 shall be used for road construction Board
materials
Hazardous Wastes Hazardous wastes shall be
Protection to the general public
(Management, Handling and generated due to activities like of State Pollution Control
14 against improper handling and Yes
Trans-boundary Movement) maintenance and repair work of Board
disposal of hazardous wastes
Rules, 2008 vehicles
Chemical Accidents (Emergency Protection against chemical Handling of hazardous (flammable, District & Local Crisis
15 Planning, Preparedness and accident while handling any Yes toxic and explosive) chemicals Group headed by the
Response) Rules, 1996 hazardous chemicals resulting during road construction DM and SDM
17 The Building & Other Employing Lab our / workers Yes Employment of labors District labor
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
Applicability Implementing /
S. No. Law / Regulation / Guidelines Relevance Reason for Application
Yes / No Responsible Agency
Construction Workers Commissioner
(Regulation of Employment &
Conditions of Service) BOCW
Act, 1996
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
Key international agreements that India is signatory to and relevant for the project are provided below:
• Convention Relative to the conservation of Flora and Fauna in their Natural State (1933)
• Convention concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage (Paris,
1972)
• Convention on the Prior Informed Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides
in International Trade (PIC or Rotterdam, 1990)
• Convention concerning the Protection of the World's Cultural and Natural Heritage (1975)
The above list of international conventions served as requirements for the project to comply.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
Environmental and social safeguards are a cornerstone of ADBs support for environmentally sustainable
economic growth. The Safeguard Policy Statement builds upon the three safeguard policies on the
environment, involuntary resettlement, and indigenous people, and brings them into a consolidated
policy framework to enhance effectiveness and relevance. The Safeguard Policy Statements, lays out
Policy Principles and outlines a set of specific safeguard requirements that ADB supported projects are
expected to meet. The ADB Safeguard Policies cover the following aspects.
• Environmental assessment;
• Environmental planning, and management;
• Information disclosure;
• Consultation and participation;
• Grievance Redress mechanisms;
• Monitoring and Reporting;
• Unanticipated Environment Impacts;
• Biodiversity and sustainable natural resources management;
• Pollution prevention and abatement;
• Health and safety;
• Physical cultural resources; and
• Involuntary resettlement;
• Indigenous peoples
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
12. Involuntary Borrower / client should provide adequate Land for the project shall be
resettlement; and appropriate replacement land and acquired from the public/Govt.
structures or cash compensation at full and local inhabitants following
replacement cost for lost land and the Govt. of India/State of
structures, adequate compensation for Assam and NHIDCL/MoRTH
partially damaged structures, and Guidelines.
relocation assistance.
The rate of compensation for acquired
housing, land and other assets should be
calculated at full replacement costs. The
calculation of full replacement cost should
be based on the following elements: (i) fair
market value; (ii) transaction costs; (iii)
interest accrued, (iv) transitional and
restoration costs; and (v) other applicable
payments.
13. Indigenous Borrower / client should explore to the Land for the project shall be
peoples; maximum extent possible alternative acquired from the public/Govt.
project designs to avoid physical relocation and local inhabitants following
of Indigenous People that shall result in the Govt. of India/State of
adverse impacts on their identity, culture, Assam and NHIDCL/MoRTH
and customary livelihoods. If avoidance is Guidelines.
impossible, in consultation with ADB, a
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
The World Bank has 10 operational safeguard policies for the development projects that are funded by
the Bank. The purpose of these policies is to ensure that social and environmental risks are prevented or
at least minimized while increasing socio-economic benefits of approved projects in addition to
preserving the environment.
These policies have been a means to increase the effectiveness and positive impacts of development
projects and programs supported by the Bank.
With respect to this project, three key policies are being triggered. These are Environmental Assessment
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
(OP/BP 4.01), Involuntary Resettlement (OP/BP 4.12) and Physical Cultural Resources (OP/BP 4.11)
This policy is triggered if a project is likely to have significant adverse environmental impacts in its area
of influence. For Category A projects, such as this project, a comprehensive Environmental and Social
Impact Assessment and the resultant Environmental and Social Management Plan are required, with
emphasis on integrating environmental measures in project planning, design, implementation and
operation, in addition to ensuring the environmental soundness and sustainability of investment
projects.
The project’s ESIA and ESMP take into account the natural environment (air, water, and land); human
health and safety; and social aspects (involuntary resettlement, physical cultural resources, etc.) in
addition to trans-boundary and global environmental aspects. The policy requires consultations with
potentially affected persons and analysis of alternatives as key parts of the process and documentation.
The OP 4.01 is applicable to all components of Bank financed projects.
This policy requires that adverse social impacts of projects it supports be mitigated, including when land
or property is acquired or its use modified under a project so that Project-affected Persons (PAPs) suffer
loss of income, residence, livelihoods or access to resources, either permanent or temporary, whether
the land occupation/use is legal or illegal. Resettlement or relocation of PAPs adversely affected by
project activities must be undertaken in accordance with laws, regulations and guidelines for
Resettlement/Land Acquisition in Govt. of India/State of Assam Resettlement & Rehabilitation Policy
and OP 4.12. If there is a gap between Govt. of India/State of Assam Resettlement & Rehabilitation
Policy and the Bank’s OP 4.12 then the Bank’s provisions must apply.
• Involuntary resettlement should be avoided where feasible, or minimized, exploring all viable
alternative project designs.
• Where it is not feasible to avoid resettlement, resettlement activities should be conceived and
executed as sustainable development programs, providing sufficient investment resources to
enable the persons displaced by the project to share in project benefits.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
• Displaced persons should be assisted in their efforts to improve their livelihoods and standards
of living or at least to restore them, in real terms, to pre-displacement levels or to levels
prevailing prior to the beginning of project implementation, whichever is higher.
• This policy covers direct economic and social impacts that both result from Banks assisted
investment projects, and are caused by:
o Loss of income sources or means of livelihood, whether or not the affected persons must
move to another location; or
• The involuntary restriction of access to legally designated parks and protected areas resulting in
adverse impacts on the livelihoods of the displaced persons.
Furthermore, the Bank requires that appropriate and accessible grievance mechanisms are established
for project affected persons. A Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for the project shall be prepared as a
separate document.
The Policy triggered if there are physical cultural resources will be affected due to proposed
development. Procedures to deal with such instances in line with the Govt. of India/State of Assam law
and OP 4.11 will need to be integrated into the civil works contract documents, through the ESMP.
This Bank Policy supports decision making process by the Borrower and Bank through allowing public
access to information on environmental and social aspects of projects. Disclosure of key project
documents, including Executive summaries in English and in the local language, is mandated:
• In the World Bank Info Shop before project appraisal, in English with the Executive Summary in
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
English and in the local language (documents can be in draft but must meet World Bank
standards).
C. OTHER WB GUIDELINES
Other useful guidelines and manuals that have been considered during the ESIA phase of the
project include:
• Environmental, Health and Safety (EHS) General Guidelines of the World Bank Group
• Roads and the Environment. A Handbook. World Bank Technical Paper 376.
• Doing Better Business through Effective Public Consultation and Disclosure – A good Practice
Manual, issued by IFC.
7.6.1 Introduction
The collection of baseline information on biophysical, social and economic aspects of the project area is
the most important reference for conducting environment study. Social and Environment team have
visited the site to collect environment and socio-economic data pertaining to the planned road project.
The outcome of the findings is discussed in this section of the report.
Details of affected structures were collected for 22.5 m on either side from the center line of the road.
Details of sensitive receptors, those are located beyond 22.5 m were also collected as the noise and air
pollution may take place beyond direct area (approximately 500 meters) of impact.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
A. Secondary Data
Data collection from the secondary sources has been done from various authentic and published
sources. Following are some important information available from secondary sources.
• Project objectives, technical information on existing road features from Contract Document
• Climatic condition & long-term meteorological data from Indian Meteorological Department
and government websites
• Geology, seismicity, soil and topography from government websites & district groundwater
brochure of CGWB
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
B. Primary Data
Field study / monitoring have been carried out to generate and collect primary data in the study
corridor, which involves:
• Inventory of road features like drinking water source, water bodies, community structures,
environmentally sensitive locations areas, congested locations etc. from physical surveys
• Environment Monitoring
7.6.4 Location
Assam is known for Assam tea and Assam silk. The state has conserved the one-horned Indian
rhinoceros from near extinction, along with the wild water buffalo, pygmy hog, tiger and various species
of Asiatic birds, and provides one of the last wild habitats for the Asian elephant. The Assamese
economy is aided by wildlife tourism to Kaziranga National Park and Manas National Park, which are
World Heritage Sites. Sal tree forests are found in the state which, as a result of abundant rainfall, look
green all year round. Assam receives more rainfall than most parts of India; this rain feeds the
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
Brahmaputra River, whose tributaries and oxbow lakes provide the region with a hydro-geomorphic
environment.
a. Hojai District: Hojai is a new district in the state of Assam, in India. It was formed on 15 August
2015. Hojai is the headquarter of the new district. Hojai district is formed with three tehsils of
Nagaon district named Hojai, Doboka and Lanka. As per Indian census 2011, those three tehsils
together had a population of 931,218. So, newly formed Hojai district had a population of
931,218 in 2011. Among those 499,565 are Muslim & 424,065 are Hindu. Muslims constitute
53.65% of district population, Hindu constitute 45.53% of district population.
b. Karbi Anglong District: Karbi Anglong district is one of the 33 administrative districts of Assam
state in Northeastern India. The district is bounded by Golaghat district on the east, Morigaon
district on the west, Nagaon and Golaghat districts on the north and Dima Hasao district and
Nagaland state on the south. The district is located between 25º 33′ and 26º 35′ North latitude
and from 92º 10′ to 93º 50′ East longitude. Diphu is the administrative headquarter of the
district. Indigenous tribal communities particularly Karbi people form the majority of the
population. According to the 2011 census Karbi Anglong District has a population of 965,280.
This gives it a ranking of 451st in India (out of a total of 640). The district has a population density
of 93 inhabitants per square kilometre (240/sq mi). Its population growth rate over the decade
2001-2011 was 17.58%. Karbi Anglong has a sex ratio of 951females for every 1000 males and
a literacy rate of 74%. with Male and Female constituting 82% and 65% respectively.
The topography, geology, seismicity and Soil of the project districts is detailed in Table 7.9 as follows:
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
Table 7.7: Topography, Geology, Seismicity and Soil of the project districts
Assam
Factors Hojai District Karbi Anglong District
Topography Hojai is a newly formed district which The Karbi Anglong district covered total
is carved out from Nagaon district on geographical area of 10434 Sq Km
15th August, 2015. Hojai is located at which
26.0°N 92.87°E. It has an average accounts for 13.3% total geographical
elevation of 59 metres (193 feet). area of Assam State. It is almost
consisting of
undulating and hilly terrain with
numerous rivers and streams. The
altitude of Karbi Anglong district varies
from 600 meters in the North range to
900 meters on south range, while that
of the valley area range from 75
meters to
150 meters.
Geology The geological formations of the Sub- The geological setting of the hill
division as seen from the outcrop districts of Karbi Anglong is a complex
ping rocks are confined mainly to one. The western part of Karbi Anglong
three geological periods viz. Pre- physically attached with Meghalaya
cambrian, Tertiary and quartemeiy lying mainly north of the Mynriang and
ages. Maximum areas of Hojai Sub- Amring rivers. Granite, gneiss and the
division are mostly covered by recent Shillong group of rocks are
alluvium formed by the Brahmaputra predominant.
tributaries.
Seismicity As per the seismic zoning map of As per the seismic zoning map of India,
India, as incorporated in Indian as incorporated in Indian Standard
Standard Criteria for earthquake Criteria for earthquake Resistant
Resistant Design of Structure IS:1893- Design of Structure IS:1893-(Part I)
(Part I) 2002: General Provisions and 2002: General Provisions and Buildings;
Buildings; the entire state of Assam the entire state of Assam has been
has been assigned to seismic zone V, assigned to seismic zone V, which is the
which is the most seismotectonically most seismotectonically active zones
active zones on the map. on the map.
Soil The soil of Hojai district is mainly Two types of soils are mainly observed
alluvium. From physical and chemical in the district. These are (1) Brown to
characteristics, pale brown soil
alluvial soil can be classified into two developed on the top of the hills,
classes, viz., lateritic in places and (2) the alluvial
residual and transported soil. soil, sandy loam or clayey developed
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
Assam
Factors Hojai District Karbi Anglong District
Residual soils are found on the low lying terrain.
mainly near the foothills of the
districts. Alluvial soil is
the main transported soil in the plain
area.
7.6.6 Climatology
In accordance to 2Köppen–Geiger Climate Classification system, The project districts i.e. Hojai, Karbi
Anglong in Assam falls under3Humid subtropical climate (Cwa).
*Source: Peel, M. C., Finlayson, B. L., and McMahon, T. A. (University of Melbourne) Enhanced, modified,
and vectorized by Ali Zifan. - Hydrology and Earth System Sciences: "Updated world map of the Köppen-
Geiger climate classification"
2 Köppen-Geiger Climate Classification is one of the most widely used climate classification systems. The system is based on the
concept that native vegetation is the best expression of climate. Thus, climate zone boundaries have been selected with
vegetation distribution in mind. It combines average annual and monthly temperatures and precipitation, and the seasonality
of precipitation.
3A humid subtropical climate is a zone of climate characterized by hot and humid summers, and mild to cool winters. These
climates normally lie on the southeast side of all continents, generally between latitudes 25° and 35° and are located poleward
from adjacent tropical climates.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
a) Hojai District: The climate in Hojai is warm and temperate. In winter, there is much less rainfall
in Hojai than in summer. The Köppen-Geiger climate classification is Cwa. In Hojai, the average
annual temperature is 24.4 °C. Precipitation here averages 1562 mm. The driest month is
January, with 9 mm of rain. With an average of 295 mm, the most precipitation falls in July. The
driest month is January, with 9 mm of rain. With an average of 295 mm, the most precipitation
falls in July.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
4 Diphu is the headquarter of Karbi Anglong district in the state of Assam in India.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
Two main rivers of the Hojai district are Kopili and Jamuna. After entering Assam, the Kopili separates
the Karbi Anglong district from the Dima Hasao North Cachar Hills district and flows into the Nagaon
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
district in a north-westerly direction. While Jamuna River with a catchment of 3960 km2 flows to the
Kopili at Jamunamukh.The Kopili River finally flows to Kalang, a spill channel of Brahmaputra, near
Hatimukh after traversing a distance of 290 km2. The total catchment of Kopili River is about 16,421km2
The drainage network of Karbi Anglong District forms the upper catchment of Dhansiri river, Jamuna
and Kopili rivers. The drainage pattern is dendritic to sub-parallel and is controlled by structural features
and underlying lithology.
Air quality along the project stretch is observed healthy and clean in the study area. No major dust
emitting activities was observed along the project road. Ambient air quality monitoring for various
parameters like PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, CO shall be started at project site and surrounding area.
However, during detailed EIA & EMP study, air quality monitoring will be carried out along the road to
understand the actual baseline condition.
Central and State Pollution Control Board guidelines shall be followed for sampling and analysis. The
data will be compared with the National Ambient Air Quality Standard of CPCB as given in Table 7.11
below.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
Annual Arithmetic mean of minimum 104 measurements in a year at a particular site taken twice
a week 24 hourly at uniform interval.
**24 hourly or 8 hourly or 1 hourly monitored values, as applicable, shall be compiled with 98%
time in a year. 2 % of the time, they may exceed the limits but not on two consecutive days of
monitoring.
The noise level on road side was found low on the stretch except the market area that has some traffic
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
during day time otherwise the noise level is normal as observed during consultation. Day and night time
ambient noise levels will be determined based on monitored data. Monitoring location shall be finalized
based on the sensitive receptors and source of noise pollution. The data will be compared with Ambient
Noise level standards as given in Table 7.12 below:
Note-:
1. Day time shall mean from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. and Night time shall mean from 10 p.m. to 6
a.m.
2. Silence Zone is an area comprising not less than 100 meters around hospitals, education
institutions, courts, religious places or any other area, which is declared as such by
Competent Authority.
3. Mixed categories of areas may be declared as one of the four above-mentioned categories
by the Competent Authority.
4. * dB(A) Leq denotes the time weighted average of the level of decibels on scale A which is
related to Human Beings
5. A “decibel” is the unit in which noise is measured
6. “A” in dB (A) Leq, denotes the frequency weighted in the measurement of the noise
corresponds to frequency response characteristics of the human ear.
7. Leq: It is an energy means of the noise level over a specified period.
In the “Revised Survey of Forest Types in India”, Champion and Seth categorized as many as fifty-one
different forest types/ sub types for this region. But, the species diversity is so spectacular that it
becomes often difficult to clearly identify separate riche to existing plant formations. However, broadly
speaking the forest in Assam can be described into following types/ sub types.
Tropical Wet Evergreen Forests.
Tropical Semi Evergreen Forests.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
Important Tree Species along the project road: Hollong (Dipterocarpus macrocarpus), Dipterocarpus
terbinatus (Garjan) Michelia glabra (Champ), Palaquium polyanthum (Kathalua) etc. Sal (Shora robusta)
Adina cordifolia (Haldu), Ficus species (Bor, Dimoru, Dhupbor, Bot, Athabor, tengabor, Lotadioru,
Khongaldimoru), Michelia champaca (Teeta champa), Terminalia species (Hilikha, Bhomora, Bohera).
Toona ciliate (Poma) etc. Adina cordifolia (Haldu), Albizia species (Siris, Alstonia scholaris (Satiana),
Dalbergia species (Sissoo, Medelua), Ficus species (Bot, Bor, Dimoru), Aegle marmelos (Bel), Albizia
species (Siris), Cassia fistula (Sonaru), Bombax ciba (Simul), Melia azedarach (Neem), Moringa oleifera
(Sajana) and Terminalia species (Hilikha,Bhomora) etc.
7.6.12 Reserved Forest and Eco sensitive Locations along the Project Road
Some part of the project road is passing through the reserve forest under Daboka – Lahorijan section
and wild life sanctuary under Numaligarh - Khatkhati section. A list showing the forest stretches is
presented in Table 7.13.
A total of 3.18 km of road stretches are traversing through built-up locations which falls under 2 villages
as detailed in Table 7.14 as follows:
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
No archeological site listed under Archeological Survey of India, has been identified in close vicinity of
the project road.
About 5 education facilities are likely to be affected by the proposed improvement. The details of
facilities are given in Table 7.15 below.
Table 7.15: Education facilities along Section-1 to 4 of Daboka To Lahorijan Section of NH-29
S.No. Features Existing Road Side Dist from
Chainage (km) Segment C/W edge
(m)
Section 3
1. Primary School 68+380 NH29 LHS 50.0
2. Langhin Primary School 69+500 NH29 LHS 40.0
3. Langhin H.S School B.W 71+120 NH29 LHS 2.0
4. High School 72+000 NH29 LHS 10.0
5. Pholoni Primary School 73+120 NH29 RHS 17.0
6. Pholoni F.P School 75+600 NH29 LHS 8.0
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
1 Religious structure (Temples/Church & Mosque) are likely to be impacted in Section-3 of the stretch
due to the proposed 4-lane widening Daboka to Lahorijan Section of NH-29. Details of these hospitals
are given in Table 7.17 below.
Table 7.17: Religious & Cultural Structures along Daboka To Lahorijan Section of NH-29
S.No. Features Existing Chainage Road Segment Side Dist from C/W edge
(km) (m)
Section 3
1. Temple 75+080 NH29 LHS 2.0
As a part of the project preparation and to ensure that the community support is obtained and the
project supports the felt needs of the people; stakeholder consultations were carried out as an integral
component. A continuous involvement of the stakeholders and the affected community was obtained.
Individual interviews, field level observations, transect walk, community consultations & meetings were
used to collect stakeholders input on the project. Meetings with community were conducted in both
ways i.e. formal as well as informal.
Detailed Stakeholder consultation and socio-economic surveys shall be carried out during the EIA stage.
Based on the collected site data and field investigations, the critical sections have been recognized for
further detailed Environmental Impact Assessment study. For convenience, the road has been divided
into different segments and was screened with respect to sensitive environment features as mentioned
in Table 7.18
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
All the road sections were subjected to screening considering the major environmental indicators within
area of influence, their importance and their presence in the section and their degree of sensitivity.
Water resources
Major Settlement/ built-up area
Religious structures
Road side tree cutting
Forest Area
Environmentally Protected Area
The road sections with more than one environmental feature have been designated as sensitive section.
All the sensitive section shall be carefully analyzed during Environmental Impact Assessment study and
accordingly safeguard measures will be provided in Environmental Management Plan.
7.8.2.1 Water Resources
River/ pond / lake has major environmental significance in the project area as they are being utilized by
the nearby villagers. The details of water resources in the project road are listed in Table 7.14.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
The road section with high settlement area has been considered as sensitive zone. The widening process
will involve loss of public properties, resettlement and rehabilitation problem. The people residing at
roadside are exposed to the emissions and are vulnerable to health problems. During construction
phase, they will be directly exposed to additional emissions and noise pollution. The sensitive receptors
are located mainly in the settlement area. Thus, the area without any settlement or low built-up area is
likely to be affected less. Some section of road is passing through populated area along the road. During
detailed study, impacts will be identified on the structures falling within ROW and rehabilitation and
resettlement plan will be prepared as per the requirement. Thus, these sections have importance both
from environmental and social aspects.
A number of religious structures are located both sides along the project corridor. These structures are
socially critical issue and hence make the section containing them as high sensitive impact zones. All
these sites are critical and proper attention shall be given during detailed Environmental Impact
Assessment study.
7.8.2.4 Roadside Tree Cutting
Tree cutting is a critical environmental issue but the cutting of roadside trees is inevitable during the
widening process. Road side trees present throughout length of the project road will be counted during
detailed study. Species wise and girth wise details of trees within ROW will be provided in EIA & EMP
report.
Attempt has been made to identify and assess the probable impacts on different environmental
parameters due to planning, construction and the operation of the proposed development. After
studying the existing baseline environmental scenario, initial field surveys, reviewing the process and
related statutory norms, the major impacts can be identified and assessed during the design,
construction and the operation phases.
Road construction related impacts occur at three stages of the project:
i) Design and Pre-construction
ii) Construction
iii) Operation
The major impacts during Planning and designing phase is related with the land acquisition, since
widening needs land area throughout the corridor. The impacts during construction phase, in general,
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
have adverse influence on all the components of environment. Most of these impacts are short lived
and reversible in nature. A proper care is must to minimize the negative impacts, which can facilitate the
restoration. Operation phase impacts are continuous in nature. To identify these impacts broadly on
physical, ecological and social environment Impact Identification Matrix of potential environmental
impacts due to the project and preliminary mitigation measures has been developed and is presented in
Table 7.19.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
Table 7.19: Matrix of Potential Environmental Impacts due to the Project and Preliminary Mitigation Measures
Significance Duration
Environmental Direct/
Impacts (High/ of Mitigation
Components Indirect
Medium/Low) Impacts
Preconstruction Land Acquisition D H L The alignment selection should be in such
manner to minimize the acquisition of land. As
far as possible the productive land area should
be avoided to acquire.
Construction
Physical Resources
Soil Loss of top soil due to site clearance, D H L Top soil should be removed & stored separately
excavation, Hill cutting during excavation.
Re-vegetate the disturbed slope as early as
possible
Soil compaction due to storage of quarry D H L Regulation of movement and parking of vehicles
materials and other heavy equipment’s, and equipment outside ROW. Storage of
movements of heavy vehicles at the site materials should be allowed only at wasteland
or barren area.
Air Quality Reduced buffering of air pollutants, I L L Tree plantation
hotter, drier microclimate due to tree
felling and vegetation loss during site
clearance
Localized increase in pollutants due to D L S Vehicles should be maintained such that
increase in number of construction exhaust emissions are minimum.
vehicles and equipment’s.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
Significance Duration
Environmental Direct/
Impacts (High/ of Mitigation
Components Indirect
Medium/Low) Impacts
Dust generation due to earth excavation, I L S • Vehicles delivering materials should be
transportation & heavy vehicles covered.
maintenance or operation, Construction • Regular water sprinkling over exposed
of structures and earth works, asphalt & surfaces.
crusher plants
Toxic gas emissions during asphalt D M S • The asphalt mixing plant should be located
preparation, bituminous heating in conformity with the statuary
requirements.
• Consent to Establish and Consent to
Operate from SPCB should be obtained prior
to operation of plant.
Noise Quality Increased noise level due to excavators/ D M S Noise standards of industrial enterprises shall be
machinery etc., operation and strictly enforced. Proper scheduling of the
maintenance of heavy vehicles and operation of these equipment’s.
equipment’s, Asphalt preparation and The stationary noise generating equipment’s
crushing should be installed sufficiently away from
habitation area.
Surface Water Additional pressure on water demand due D M S Alternative water supply system for
to the water requirement for construction construction should be ensured in such a way to
works prevent the additional pressure on public water
supply system
Damage to streams, springs, from D H L Prohibit activities which cause blockage or
excavation, cutting of hill, spoil disposal otherwise impede water flow
Suitable measures should be taken to avoid any
damage to springs.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
Significance Duration
Environmental Direct/
Impacts (High/ of Mitigation
Components Indirect
Medium/Low) Impacts
Blockage of water flow channels due to D M S Proper excavation and disposal of the extra fill
unmanaged excavation and earth filling material away from stream.
Provision of cross drainage during construction
along the stream and springs.
Contamination of water due to spillage, I M S Strict regulation of traffic flow, waste disposals,
construction wastes bunding around fuel storage site, proper
disposal system at equipment and vehicle
service stations
Impairment of surface water bodies, new I H L Controlled quarrying and borrowing
water bodies due to Quarries/ borrow
pits
Ground water Ground water exploitation for I L S Regulation of ground water extraction
construction works and workforce camp
Surface water should be used for construction
Drainage Interference with natural drainage flow D M S Regulation of dumping of waste materials and
Pattern due to earth excavation dumping, proper care should be taken at the site of
disposal of wastes and surplus earth construction to minimize the wastage. Clean fill
materials, and construction of structures material devoid of soil particles to prevent
and earthworks siltation and deposition on the way of natural
drainage.
Ecological Resources
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
Significance Duration
Environmental Direct/
Impacts (High/ of Mitigation
Components Indirect
Medium/Low) Impacts
Vegetation • Impacts on forests from land take and D/I H L Cut only those trees affected by permanent
loss of trees. works; specify non-timber construction
• Fire risks during vegetation clearance materials
and asphalt preparation I H L Strengthen forest protection and management.
• Encroachment on to forest for
construction camps and loss of forest Camp should be established away from forest
resources due to demands for fuel D/I M L area
woods of workforce and incomers Prohibition of clearing of trees for firewood,
prohibiting on trapping and killing of wild life
Kerosene or gas cylinders should be supplied to
campsite to avoid use of firewood.
Wild Animals Disturbance or hunting of wild animals I H S Control workforce, awareness programme for
the workforce, strict enforcement of Wildlife
(Protection) Act,1972.
No camp site near forest area.
Prohibition of hunting of wild animals
Social Environment
Resettlement Problem of Resettlement and D H L Adjustment in alignment to avoid displacement
and Rehabilitation Early identification and entitlement of the
Rehabilitation project affected people
Early planning of rehabilitation and
resettlement
Livelihood Economic losses as a result of property D M L The alignment selection should be done in a
loss due to land take for widening way to minimize the land acquisition
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
Significance Duration
Environmental Direct/
Impacts (High/ of Mitigation
Components Indirect
Medium/Low) Impacts
Employment Employment on road construction, and D H S Encourage local recruitment
resultant flow
Religious / Impact on religious/ cultural structure D H L Shifting and restoration of structures through
Cultural public consultation.
feature
Health • Health problems to the local people D M S Appropriate siting of plant establishment.
settled near the construction sites Strict adherence to the emission standards laid
because of toxic gaseous emissions due by the Central Pollution Control Board, regular
to asphalt preparation and crushing monitoring of emissions.
• Asphalt odour and dust due to asphalt
and crusher plant and laying of D M S Provision of emergency medical facility.
pavement.
Sanitation Insanitation condition at Campsite D H S Suitable medical facilities for workers
First Aid facilities at camp/ construction site
Safety at Work Accidents at work and on the road D/I M/H S Safe working techniques; safety clothing; proper
site training to workers and drivers
Operational Phase
Natural Long term stability problems along some D M L Provide adequate resources for effective
Resources sections of the road maintenance programme
Air Quality Increase in air quality due to stimulation D L L Providing lateral buffer zones in design, regular
of traffic flow, intense human activity, Regulation of air pollution by legislation and
congestion public awareness
Regulate development activities along the
corridor
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
Significance Duration
Environmental Direct/
Impacts (High/ of Mitigation
Components Indirect
Medium/Low) Impacts
Forests • Increased exposure to anthropogenic D M L Enactment and enforcement of laws regulating
activities due to better access human intrusions, implementation of traffic
• Forest cutting and poaching due to control measures such as low speed limits near
induced development I M the forest
L Better forest management
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
A site-specific Environmental Management Plan (EMP) will be prepared for avoiding, mitigating,
checking the adverse impacts envisaged during EIA studies on various environmental components
during construction and operational phase of the project. This Environmental Management Plan will
include brief description about the project, EMP for construction and operation phase, tree
plantation strategy and environmental monitoring plans.
The EIA & EMP report will be prepared as per MoEF&CC EIA Notification 2006 and amendments
thereafter and chapters will also be structured accordingly. Structure of EIA & EMP report is
provided in Table 7.20.
Table 7.20: Structure of EIA & EMP Report
Chapter Report Content Description
No. Structure
1. Introduction Purpose of the report
Identification of project & project proponent
Brief description of nature, size, location of the project and its
importance to the country, region
Scope of the study – details of regulatory scoping carried out (As per
Terms of Reference)
2. Project Condensed description of those aspects of the project (based on
Description project feasibility study), likely to cause environmental effects.
Details should be provided to give clear picture of the following:
Type of project
Need for the project
Location (maps showing general location, specific location, project
boundary & project site layout)
Size or magnitude of operation (incl. Associated activities required by
or for the project
Proposed schedule for approval and implementation
Technology and process description
Project description. Including drawings showing project layout,
components of project etc. Schematic representations of the
feasibility drawings which give information important for EIA purpose
3. Description of Study area, period, components & methodology
the Establishment of baseline for valued environmental components, as
Environment identified in the scope
Base maps of all environmental components
4. Anticipated Details of Investigated Environmental impacts due to project
Environmental location, possible accidents, project design, project construction,
Impacts & regular operations, final decommissioning or rehabilitation of a
Mitigation completed project
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 7: Environmental Screening
Daboka Reserve Forest in Daboka to Lahorijan Section Longhit Reserve Forest in Daboka to Lahorijan
of NH-29 Section of NH-29
River at Km 40+100 in Daboka to Lahorijan Section of River at Km 108+800 in Daboka to Lahorijan Section
NH-29 of NH-29
Temple at Km 128+010 in Daboka to Lahorijan Section Forest office on either side of the road at Km
of NH-29 157+300 in Daboka to Lahorijan Section of NH-29
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 8: Preliminary Social Impact Assessment
CHAPTER 8
8.1 Introduction
The proposed project of the Nagaon – Dimapur Economic Corridor, have three stretches viz.,
1) Daboka – Manja, 2) Manja – Lahorijan, & 3) Numaligarh – Khatkhati, in the state of Assam
has been specified in Chapter 1. The Section-3 under Daboka-Manja stretch, has the project
influence area (PIA) of the project has been identified in Chapter 3 Socio-economic profile as
(1) Direct PIA as the vicinity on both sides of the project road, (2) Indirect PIA of the districts
of Hojai, East Karbi Anglong and Golaghat and (3) Tertiary PIA as the state of Assam as a
whole.
The socio-economic profile of the indirect and tertiary project influence area has been
prepared based on secondary official sources of information and discussed in Chapter 3
Socio-economic profile. The present chapter provides with a screening report on possible
social impacts of the vicinity of the project based on an initial assessment from the
reconnaissance survey and further field investigations.
Although such benefits were not quantified, the project is also expected to help alleviate
development constraints in agriculture, commerce, education, health, social welfare, and
public safety and contribute to general expansion and diversification of development
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 8: Preliminary Social Impact Assessment
activities.
Preliminary survey activities have been carried out to assess the potential impacts of the
proposed project for the direct influence area. Features and properties along the Corridor of
Impact (COI) and Right of Way (ROW) and distance from the road to habitations and their
distance from the center line were observed, recorded and analyzed and presented.
The average carriageway width of the existing road is 7 - 10 m and the width of the earthen
shoulder varies from 1 m to 2.0 m on both sides. Details of the existing carriageway width is
presented in Appendices Volume (under Volume-IA).
As per investigation with sample measurements at site the existing total ROW at built up
area and forest area are found to vary between 10.0m-45.0m in total. It appears from the
first impression that the improved facility can be accommodated with acquisition of lower
order structures except at Dokmoka and Manja where provision of bypass is thought off.
Existing ROW information needs to be verified upon receipt of revenue maps. The collection
of Revenue Maps for verification of the official record is in process. A statement of existing
ROW is provided in in Chapter-2.
The project road is passing mainly through plain & rolling terrain.
Daboka, Sildharampur, Patradisa and Longnit Reserve Forests are involved for Section-1, 2 &
5 of the road stretches.
The study identifies 2 numbers of villages and towns along section-3 of the existing road.
The settlements along the existing road is given in Table 8.1 and pictures in Plate 8.1.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 8: Preliminary Social Impact Assessment
In addition to the above, a few clusters of habitation were also found at many locations
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 8: Preliminary Social Impact Assessment
along the project road in scattered manner. These are mainly comprised of kutcha type
structures.
The assessment of potential positive externalities and negative impacts of the project is
identified preliminarily. The assessment of impacts is being covered under following
variables: number of structures likely to be impacted, number of religious structures likely to
be impacted, number of community property and resources likely to be impacted, built up
sections along the corridor etc. The project may trigger the following categories of loss:
• Loss of Agricultural/ homestead Land and other Properties
• Loss of Residential Properties
• Loss of Commercial Properties
• Families losing Residential cum Commercial Structures
• Loss of economic/ livelihoods
The project affected families may be categorized in following three broad categories:
• Titleholders: People who are losing land, land & structures, only part of structures,
which are under legal ownership of the incumbent
• Non-Titleholders: People who are losing structures/ part of structures, which were
erected/ extended on the land not under his legal ownership, and
• Livelihoods Losers: Any person from the previous categories, Kiosks operators, tenants
of the affected structures and employees of the affected Business are likely to be
affected with existing economic/ physical livelihood losses.
The details of land acquisition and quantum of loss under each category will be given in DPR
stage.
Proposed ROW of 42m is considered for the road sections in rural area. In built-up area 47m PROW
is considered. In forest area, to minimize the land acquisition, 35.5m PROW and at the approach of
elephant underpasses, 42.5m PROW are considered. In approach of grade separator 60m ROW is
considered.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 8: Preliminary Social Impact Assessment
The impacts on structures on the both sides of the existing road have been preliminarily
estimated within PROW. All the structures mentioned in the list may not necessarily be
affected. The list of likely affected structures is presented in Table 8.2.
The impacts on community structures on the both sides of the existing road have also been
estimated within PROW. The final design will avoid the community structures as much as
possible. The list of likely affected community structures is presented in Table 8.3 and
pictures in Plate 8.2.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 8: Preliminary Social Impact Assessment
Consultation with Project Affected Persons (PAPs) is the starting point to address involuntary
resettlement issues, concerning land acquisition and rehabilitation. People affected by
resettlement may be apprehensive that they will lose their livelihoods and communities.
Information dissemination of the project is the first principle of consultation. Participation in
planning and managing resettlement helps to reduce their fears and gives PAPs an
opportunity to participate in key decisions that affect their lives.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 8: Preliminary Social Impact Assessment
The detailed Social & Resettlement Assessment will be conducted after the road alignment
and development schemes are being finalized. The consultant will undertake census (100%)
and socio-economic surveys (25%) of the affected persons, as per the proposed
development. In addition to the census and socio-economic surveys, public consultations
with the stakeholders including the communities and affected persons will be conducted.
The objective is to establish a base line profile of population which includes data on gender,
ethnicity, social structure, employment and labour patterns, sources of income (including
production and marketing activities), local tenure and property rights arrangements, access
to social services and facilities (including health, education, and agricultural extension and
credit); use of community and natural resources relevant to formulation of development
strategies in order to assist in determining project impacts on the social, economic, cultural,
and livelihood activities of affected communities.
All untitled occupants will be recorded at the initial stages and identify cards will be issued
to ensure there is no further influx of people into the project area. All consultations with
affected persons should be fully documented
The consultant would prepare Resettlement and Rehabilitation Plan; assess feasibility and
effectiveness of income restoration strategies and suitability and availability to relocation
sites as per procedures of NH Act 1956 and the compensation and assistance will be guided
through Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation
and Resettlement Act, 2013 (RFCTLARR 2013), and/ or guidelines set by Govt. of Assam.
8.10 Conclusions/Recommendations
The people were generally enthusiastic towards the project and believed that it will bring
social and economic development in the region. People believed that the development of
road will improve connectivity for the local people. Agriculture is the main economic activity
in the project area. The farmers believe the road will improve their accessibility with the
nearby market places by reducing the travel time. They anticipate better income as the cost
of travel will be reduced and access to socio-economic facilities will be enhanced. People
wanted that the payment of compensation and other rehabilitation measures be completed
before the start of construction work. People were particularly concerned about the road
safety issues and expressed the need of proper signage, speed breakers and pedestrian
crossings to minimise the risk of accidents. They even demanded facilities like bus stops,
public toilets etc. Apprehensions raised by the community include more accidents, houses
coming closer to the proposed alignment, more noise pollution, agriculture loss, effect on
livelihood, and dug well loss.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 8: Preliminary Social Impact Assessment
The community perceives that the project will help in increasing road safety, promote more
business, better service facilities, and better conveyance and promote local employment
opportunities. They consider that it would lead to increase in land rates and smooth traffic.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
CHAPTER 9
COST ESTIMATES
9.1 General
Cost estimate has been prepared for the total project in section wise considering the various
items of works associated with identified improvement proposals using unit rates prevailing
currently in order to assess the updated cost structures in general.
9.2 Methodology
Quantities of different items of work have been calculated on the basis of typical existing cross-
sections as developed from the information obtained through inventory/reconnaissance survey
and typical proposed cross-sections. Quantities for other work items have also been computed
based on proposed improvement, road alignment and widening proposals as recommended.
The major items of work considered are:
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Unit rates are primarily estimated by using the SOR of P.W.D (Roads), Govt. of Assam for State
Highways and Major District Road for 2018-19.Carriage of aggregates for road works from
Quarry to Plant and Plant to Site exceeding the one considered in the SOR are added to the Base
rate to obtain the final rate of the items of works. Unit rates for other items of work were
finalized after considering the current market rates or from information or other major projects
of similar standards.
Considering various items of works associated with identified improvements and current unit
rates, cost estimate has been prepared. Summary Civil cost and TPC is provided in Table 9.1.
Costs against various pre-construction activities (asunder listed below) have been assessed on
the basis of available information and included in Table 9.1 above.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
The backup of estimate and detail of rate are provided in cost estimate volume.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
BharatmalaPriyojana
BOQ for Dokmoka to LoringThepi Village (Section-3)
(Design Chainage 65+923 to 80+930) (L=15.007 KM)
ABSTRACT OF COST
Item Bill Description Rate (Rs.) Amount(Rs)
J. Maintenance charge @ 2.5% of Civil cost Rs. 4,13,93,005
K. Total Cost (C+D+E+F+G) 2,04,15,03,029
L. Cost for Pre Construction Activities
1 Cost of Land Acquisition Rs 39,63,08,758
2 Cost of R&R Rs 3,84,00,000
3 Shifting of Utility Service Rs 20,84,45,527
4 Environment Cost Rs 5,40,23,800
5 Forest Diversion Cost Rs 45,24,000
M. Total Project Cost Rs 2,74,32,05,114
Total project cost per Km (in Cr.) 18.28
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Economic Analysis
CHAPTER 10
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
10.1 INTRODUCTION
(i) Assess the capacity of existing roads and the effects of capacity constraints on vehicle
operation costs (VOC).
(ii) Calculate VOCs for the existing road situation and those for the project.
(iii) Quantify all economic benefits, including those from reduced congestion, travel distance,
road maintenance cost savings and reduced incidences of road accidents.
(iv) Estimate the economic internal rate of return (EIRR) for the project over 30 year period.
(v) Saving in time value.
The economic evaluation has been carried out within the broad framework of social cost benefit.
The economic analysis has been taken into account all on-going and future road and transport
infrastructure projects and future development plans in the project area.
The objective is to determine the economic viability of the project as well as sections with respect
to proposed improvement schemes that leads to minimizing total transport costs and maximizing
benefits to the road users. The indicators for economic viability analysis are Economic Internal
Rate of Return (EIRR), Net Present Value (NPV) and NPV/Cost Ratio.
The costs considered comprise agency costs and costs to road users as follows.
- Construction Cost
- Maintenance Cost
Costs of Toll Plazas have been excluded from road agency costs.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Economic Analysis
- Accident Costs.
The benefits accruing to society from the proposed improvement are as follows:
Social Benefits:
At the present state of knowledge in the country, it is possible to monetarily quantify only the
direct road user benefits. This report, therefore, restricts itself to only the direct road user
benefits.
Road users experience different costs in the “With Project” and “Without Project (Base Option)”
conditions. The benefits to road users are constituted by the savings in costs. Increasing traffic
volumes as a result of the project implies more vehicle kilometres and hence more vehicles
operating costs and, possibly showing more saving in with project conditions viz. benefits as a
result of the project.
Based on traffic, Road network and Socio-economic characteristics of the project road,
improvement option (with project) have been considered by the consultants with proposed up-
gradation / improvement Option (4-Lane) of the project road. The Economic analysis is carried
out for the following improvement options
• “Without project/ Do minimum” - Routine maintenance of the existing road (Base option)
• “With Project”- Four laning of Project Road as per warrant.
The total transport costs for both the Options have been worked out on yearly basis for the
entire analysis period of 30 Years. All costs and benefits considered in the study have been valued
Detailed Project Report Page 2 of 12
Project: Consultancy Services for Preparation of DPR under Bharatmala Pariyojana
(Lot-1: Package II) [Tentative Length 217.1 km] Date: June 2020
Section-3: Km 65+923 – Km 80+930 Revision: R0
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Economic Analysis
in monetary terms and expressed in economic prices for avoiding distortion in the input prices of
labor, materials, equipment and foreign exchange due to market imperfections. The ratio of
Economic and Financial costs is taken as 0.85.
Economic analysis is carried out with help of HDM-4 (version 1.1) developed by the World Bank.
This is the updated version of HDM-III which incorporates up to date State of Art and the
research findings in road user and road deterioration related studies carried out in a number of
developed and developing countries including India over the last few decades. The HDM-4 Road
User Effects (RUE) sub-model uses mechanistic principles for the modeling of fuel and tyre
consumption. The mechanistic forces are comprised of the aerodynamic, gradient, rolling and
inverted resistance. It calculates vehicle speeds and operating costs taking into account of road
roughness and geometry, together with the characteristics of representative vehicles and also
the traffic flow. Although the latest version of HDM III (HDM Manager, 1995) includes congestion
analysis, the HDM IV model more accurately represents the prediction of vehicle operating
components under congested conditions. The HDM-4 also makes use of the CRRI deterioration
models for Indian asphalt mixes such as semi dense carpet and premix carpet and gives accurate
predictions of roughness for various road maintenance work components.
This model provides for calibration of crucial input parameters to suit the local condition and
analysis of a number of alternatives and sections at relatively greater speed than is possible with
HDM III. The Road user cost streams generated by HDM-4 are extracted and Economic Internal
Rate of Return (EIRR), Net Present Value (NPV) and sensitivity analysis have been carried out.
In order to quantify the economic viability of a project or projects three measures can be used.
All of these use a discounting approach. These are:
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Economic Analysis
n n
Bi Ci
∑ i ∑
÷ i
i=1 1 +r i=1 1 +r
n
Bi − C i
or, ∑ i
= 0
i=1 1 +r
The IRR is that discount rate r which makes NPV = 0
IRR represents average earning power of the money used in the project over the project life.
The formal decision criterion is to accept all projects with a BCR of one or greater than one, NPV
greater than Zero or IRR greater than opportunity cost of capital, since primary tangible returns
are greater than primary tangible costs. If funds are limited, the magnitude of IRR or BCR can be
used in ranking the order of priority of undertaking projects whose ratios are more than one. This
assumes, of course, that the indirect tangible and intangible benefits and costs are of minor
importance or are approximately the same for the various projects under consideration.
Sometimes, however, the indirect tangible and intangible benefits may dictate over direct
tangible benefits and so the projects with even less than one BCR may be selected for the overall
intangible benefits of the society. In practice, there is really no single yardstick to measure the
economic and financial viability of the project.
An important benefit of a capacity expansion project is the reduction in travel times for highway
users. Travel time is a major component in overall price or cost to the user, which includes time
as well as out-of-pocket costs. As with most goods and services, a lower price can be expected to
lead to more quantity demanded - in this case, some additional travel.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Economic Analysis
Price elasticity of demand is an economic concept used to summarize how much more or less of
something people will consume if its price changes. From the standpoint of estimating future
traffic levels, elasticity represents how a change in the cost of driving, due to a reduction in travel
time or implementation of a toll, may affect the volume of travel that will take place. These
changes in volume result from some drivers' decisions to make more or fewer trips than they
otherwise would have made.
Elasticity is stated in percentage change terms, e.g., an “X” percent reduction in travel time leads
to a “Y” percent increase in travel Km or trips. An elasticity of zero implies that travel is
unresponsive to a time change, no matter how large, while an infinite elasticity implies that even
a one-second decrease in travel time will cause all capacity to be completely absorbed. While
price elasticity is a generally accepted tool in economics, there are differing opinions about how
to apply it in a transportation context. The transportation economics literature reveals a wide
range of measured elasticity values, reflecting different study methods, data, time periods, and
locations. No studies, however, suggest that travel demand elasticity is either zero or infinite.
When measured on a given facility, observed elasticity includes the effects of both diverted trips,
which represent existing traffic that has simply shifted from other routes or time periods, and
new travel taken as a consequence of the lower user cost. Additional research is needed to
narrow the range of elasticity values that are applicable to a given set of circumstances - whether
facility, corridor, or region - and to develop methods for better incorporating demand elasticity
into traffic forecasting.
➢ Vehicle operating costs (VOC), that is, the physical costs of operating a vehicle such as fuel,
spare parts, depreciation, crew costs, etc;
➢ Travel time costs (TTC), that is, the value of time spent in travelling that could be used in
other activities;
➢ Accident costs (ACC), that is, the physical costs of an accident and the value of injuries and
fatalities.
The financial price is the retail market price to the consumer of the product. The economic price
reflects the true value (that is, the real worth) as well as the scarcity premium of the resource to
the economy. In the economic jargon, this is termed as a “shadow” or “accounting” price of the
resource in the economy. The shadow price of unskilled labor, for instance, may well be lower
than the wage to reflect its abundant supply, while that of a skilled professional may be higher
than the salary given to him, if his opportunity cost is considered. The economic price of a factor
Detailed Project Report Page 5 of 12
Project: Consultancy Services for Preparation of DPR under Bharatmala Pariyojana
(Lot-1: Package II) [Tentative Length 217.1 km] Date: June 2020
Section-3: Km 65+923 – Km 80+930 Revision: R0
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Economic Analysis
or a product also excludes all tax elements as they reflect mostly a transfer of resources from one
sector of the economy to another. On the other hand, subsidy elements, if any, are included with
the economic price. Furthermore, market distortion or imperfection and government regulations
or interventions are also taken into consideration while shadow-pricing a factor or a product. In
case of imported inputs, economic costs were based on the border prices plus port handling,
transportation, assembling and retail cost (profit margin) duly shadow priced. Local inputs of
labor and materials were shadow priced using the Standard Conversion Factor of 0.85.
Based on the existing traffic and pavement conditions, the project road has been divided into 3
(three) homogeneous Sections. Details are given in Table 10.1.
Road and pavement characteristics obtained from the Road Inventory Survey have been used
as Model input. These include road length, carriageway width, width of paved shoulders,
existing pavement composition, sub-grade CBR, roughness of the existing road (IRI),
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Economic Analysis
The details of model inputs for road and pavement characteristics are presented in Table
10.2. For the flexible pavement, opening year roughness has been taken as 2.5 IRI.
The classified Traffic Volume data obtained from IHMCL. The estimated ADT has been
converted in to AADT, by applying the seasonal factor as applicable to the area. The traffic
data is given below in Table 10.3.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Economic Analysis
Roadside friction has to be computed for each project road package considering the
following:
The number of settlements along the roadside and especially the extensive ribbon
development that take place is a major factor influencing road performance. The maximum
friction factor for the existing condition is taken as 0.9 and the minimum 0.8 amongst
different sub projects.
Following the improvements of package the roadside friction factor for the two lanes has to
be taken as 1.0.
Roadside friction factors have been incorporated into VOC as well as vehicle speeds for the
given volumes and composition of traffic. It is considered that the creation of free flow
conditions will be a more important yardstick with which to measure the success of any
project improvement rather than increase in vehicle speeds.
Base vehicle characteristics and its utilization data has been obtained from manufacturer’s
literature and various literatures. The same has been used as Vehicle input data for HDM-4.
The capital costs (financial) of the project road have been converted into economic cost by using
a standard conversion factor of 0.85, as suggested by the World Bank for highway projects in
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Economic Analysis
India. The conversion factor of 0.85 has been applied to all cost items except land acquisition cost
and R&R cost. The economic cost excludes the cost of toll plazas. A salvage value of 15% of
capital cost has been considered in the terminal year for flexible pavements. The project costs in
financial and economic terms for different schemes are presented in Table 10.4.
Routine maintenance, Periodic maintenance costs have been considered as per latest MORT&H
guidelines. The details of the maintenance costs and administration charges are given in Table
10.5.
Table 10.5: Routine and Periodic Maintenance Cost
The direct benefits of road improvement considered in the study include vehicle operating cost
(VOC) savings for vehicular traffic using the project road and time savings for passengers and
goods (carried) in transit. The benefit streams have been computed annually over the 30 year
benefit period for all the sections.
VOC Savings
The unit Vehicle Operating Cost (VOC) by vehicle type and VOC savings section-wise has been
computed by the HDM model. The VOC computation takes into account capacity augmentation,
Detailed Project Report Page 9 of 12
Project: Consultancy Services for Preparation of DPR under Bharatmala Pariyojana
(Lot-1: Package II) [Tentative Length 217.1 km] Date: June 2020
Section-3: Km 65+923 – Km 80+930 Revision: R0
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Economic Analysis
Time Savings
The HDM Model has generated average speeds in km/hr by vehicle type, in the existing (without
project) and the improved (with project) road conditions. The time savings for passengers and
goods (in transit) vehicles have been derived separately. For computing time saving for
passengers of cars and buses, a weighted average occupancy was used viz. Car – 4 persons and
Bus – 30 persons. The average payloads considered for goods vehicles are: LCV – 6 tonnes, Truck-
16.2 tonnes and MAV – 24 tonnes.
The value of time (VOT) for passengers and goods considered in this analysis has been based on
earlier studies carried out in recent years. For the average car passenger, VOT has been taken as
Rs. 51 per hour, and for the average bus passenger it was Rs. 35 per hour. The value placed on
time is rather on the conservative side. For goods in transit, time value has been worked out
using the inventory cost method, with a 15% interest rate considered as the opportunity cost of
capital. The VOT for goods (Cargo) vehicle worked out to Rs. 2.56 per hour for LCV, Rs. 7.87 per
hour for 2-axle trucks and Rs. 14.72 per hour for multi-axle vehicles. All above said values are
based on Road User Cost Study Report by CRRI.
A distinction made between main cause of accident and the contributory factors of accident. It is
usually difficult to identify the main cause of accidents; whereas several factors which could have
contributed to accidents can be identified.
Contributory factors of Accidents:
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Economic Analysis
The annual cost and benefit streams are used to derive the net cash flow for the project. The EIRR
and NPV @ 12% discount rate are determined using the discounted cash flow technique for all
the Sections. It is found, after analysis, that the project is economically viable.
Sensitivity analysis has been carried out for the below mentioned three variations and compared
with base case results in costs and benefits. The sensitivity scenarios take into account possible
construction delays, construction costs overrun, traffic volume, revenue shortfalls, operating
costs, exchange rate variations, convertibility of foreign exchange, interest rate volatility, non-
compliance or default by contractors, political risks and force majeure.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Economic Analysis
Results of sensitivity analysis also show that the project is economically viable for 30 years
analysis period.
10.12 CONCLUSIONS
The project road is being developed to improve the connectivity of the surrounding area and
connectivity is the guiding factor for developing this section. The surrounding areas of the road
stretches from Daboka to Lahorijan will be improved manifold if the project road is developed.
So it can be concluded that the project of up gradation to Four Lanes is economically viable and
recommended for implementation for Section-3 [from Km 65+923 (near Dokmoka) to Km 80+930
(near Loring Thepi village)].
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 11: Financial Analysis
CHAPTER 11
11.1 Background
The main objective of financial analysis is to assess the likely returns to the investors under
realistic conditions. In the present studies the financial viability of the project is assessed on the
basis of project’s financial internal rate of return on investments and Rate of Return on Equity,
which is estimated on the basis of cash flow analysis.
The main objective of financial analysis is to examine the viability of implementing the project
on a BOT and if it is not possible on BOT than on any other way of financing the project, in this
case the other alternative we are considering is on ANNUITY basis. The analysis attempts to
ascertain the extent to which the investment can be recovered through toll revenue and if any
gap remains that can be funded through funding from Government of Assam in the form of
Grant. This covers aspects like financing through debt and equity, loan repayment, debt
servicing, taxation, depreciation, etc. The viability of the project is evaluated on the basis of
Project FIRR (Financial Internal Rate of Return (FIRR) on total investment). The FIRR is estimated
on the basis of cash flow analysis, where both costs and revenue have been indexed to take
account of inflation. Financial analysis has been carried out with debt equity ratio of
70:30.Details of the project road are given in Table 1.1.
The total cost of the project includes cost of civil works involved in the widening of the roads,
Flyover. The estimated project cost is considered excluding shifting of utilities, land acquisition,
acquisition of structures, rehabilitation and resettlement and environmental mitigation
measures. The total cost of the Project has been computed based on the 2019-2020 prices and
escalated by 5% for subsequent years. The annual phasing of capital cost is made as per the
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 11: Financial Analysis
work schedule. Construction cost is phased over a period of 18 months from Oct 2020 to Mar
2022 as 60% in the first year and 40% in the second year. Cost of civil works is provided in Table
1.2.
The base costs have been escalated at a rate of 5% per annum to obtain the actual costs in the
year of expenditure. This is in line with long-term inflation rates of major materials utilized for
construction.
However total project cost has been arrived at by adding Cost towards cost of financing,interest
during construction and escalation.
Tolls can be set either to maximize revenue or maximize the utilization of the project without
causing congestion. However, in no case, tolls are set at a level higher than the perceived
benefits of using the facility. Toll rates are calculated as per NHAI notification no.
NHAI/11033/CGM(Fin)/2011. This is shown in the Table 1.3. The detailed year wise cost is given
in Annexure 11.1
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 11: Financial Analysis
11.6 Traffic
Traffic volume count (TVC) surveys for seven days have been carried out at 1 location along the
project road. For financial analysis atoll plaza is considered. For the BOT analysis, considering all
future growth predicted average toll able traffic counts (AADT) for project road is considered
based on the homogeneity of the road is given inTable 1.4. Traffic projection for financial
analysis is given in Annexure 11.2
Total Vehicles
7 Axle Above
4-Axle and 6
Magic/ LMV
Taxi/ Tata
Chainage
Minibus
Std. Bus
2-Axle
3-Axle
Sl No.
(No.)
Axle
Car/
LCV
The toll revenue is the product of the forecast traffic expected to use the road and the toll fee
for the vehicle category. Toll revenues have been calculated by collected toll at two toll plaza of
the indicative traffic for the project road length. The computed toll revenues for various years
are given below inTable 1.5. Year wise toll revenue is given in Annexure 11.4.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 11: Financial Analysis
The tax rate adopted for this study is 25.17% as proposed under Taxation Laws (Amendment)
Act, 2019 with no applicability of MAT.
In general, the developer shall crystallize the sources of finance by optimizing his equity returns
keeping in view the project cash flows, terms, and conditions of various financing options
available. Further the market standing and financial strength of the Developer would largely
determine the terms and conditions of finance offered to the Developer by various lending
agencies. For the purpose of the study, following sources of finance have been taken:
11.10 Expenses
Expenses can broadly be classified based on the phases in which these are incurred, viz.
construction period expenses and operation & maintenance period expenses.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 11: Financial Analysis
Routine maintenance/ Periodic maintenance costs have been considered as per new circular of
NHAI (letter No. RW/NH-37044/67/2011/PPP dated 16.11.2011). The details of the maintenance
costs and administration charges are given below inTable 1.6.
In the present study, the project is envisaged to be funded through equity and debt
components. Since the Project revenues are not able to sustain the capital structure, option
such as capital grant / subsidy utilization in the developmental charges method of financing shall
be explored.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 11: Financial Analysis
In general, the duration of construction for similar size road projects ranges between 12-24
months. Since the proposed Project is to be implemented on a BOT format, the developer has
an incentive in early completion of the project in order to expedite toll collection. Hence, the
Project implementation period has been taken as 18 months. Based on the implementation
period, the project cost has been phased as mentioned in Table 1.7.
The minimum return criteria for the B.O.T project is considered as follows: -
The return on project investment (Post Tax FIRR) should be between 12% to 14% while the
return on equity (Post Tax Equity IRR) ranges from 14% - 16%. The minimum average DSCR is
taken as 1.25.
The main objective of undertaking this study is to assess whether the project is financially viable
or not. It is important to note that the proposal should be an attractive proposition for private
sector participation under Build, Operate and Transfer (BOT) system. The basic methodology
followed for estimating the financial viability of the project is to calculate the FIRR (Financial
Internal Rate of Return) on the investment for the project.
The following assumptions are taken into consideration for the financial analysis: -
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 11: Financial Analysis
Moratorium – 1 year
Depreciation by Straight line method - 100% in 27 years.
Depreciation by Written down value method – 10%
Based on the project structure, study of all possible sources of revenue, financial feasibility
analysis has been carried out as per the methodology outlined in earlier sections. The objective
of the financial analysis is to ascertain the existence of sustainable project returns, which shall
successfully meet the expectations of its financial investors. The analysis reveals various FIRR
values corresponding to each year of operation.
Financial study is done considering project stretch two lane project of 15.007 Km. The details
following Financial Statements and Analysis is given in
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 11: Financial Analysis
11.17.1 Conclusions
11.17.2 Recommendations
The proposed project roadbeing developed as two lane carriageway configuration for 15.007 Km
is recommended under
EPC Construction
Annuity for 28.5 years with Government Grant at INR 22.45 crore per annum
Annuity for 28.5 years without Government Grant at INR 35.60 crore per annum
Hybrid Annuity at Bid Project Cost of INR 193.30 crore and First Year O&M Quote of INR
1 crore
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 12: Road Safety Audit
CHAPTER 12
12.1 Introduction
Road safety is now recognized as a major socioeconomic concern in India. Increasing traffic
volumes, the rapid growth in two and three wheeled traffic, higher speeds due to construction
improvement / rehabilitation of roads has increased safety problem. A Road Safety Audit (RSA)
is the safety performance examination of a road section through experienced road safety
expert. It qualitatively estimates and reports on potential road safety issues and identifies
opportunities for improvements in safety for all road users. The road safety audit investigates
general safety conditions, focuses on specific concerns or users. This also includes pedestrian
safety as well as safety of bus users.
As per the scope of works RSA needs to be performed in the following stages:
This chapter is related to safety audit report at detailed design stage. The audit team reviewed
proposed design from road safety perspective and checked the following aspects. RSA related to
construction stage and monitoring existing road stage is not discussed here.
Broadly following items have been checked or reviewed during the feasibility study stage based
on site data, existing road and proposed designs.
• Safety and operational implications of proposed alignment and junction strategy with
particular references to expected road users and vehicle types likely to use the road.
• Width options considered for various sections.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 12: Road Safety Audit
Road Safety Audit is a formal procedure that uses extensive safety engineering knowledge to
identify safety deficiencies in road sections. A broad experience in road, traffic and safety
engineering needs to be acquired to ensure that a Road Safety Auditor has the knowledge and
ability to refer back to the basic principles in road safety, and propose appropriate mitigation
measures. Following points are generally adequately clarified during a road safety audit.
• Confusion or ambiguity due to design layout for road users that could lead to potential road
traffic accidents
• Insufficient information for road users
• Improper visibility, or an obstruction to road views of road users
• Hazards in layout create or obstacles to road users that could contribute to an increased risk
of injuries
In the above cases safety of the scheme may be compromised and remedial measures may be
required to remove this potential or actual deficiency. Road users need to perceive and process
vast amounts of sensory and visual information to negotiate a road layout. On the other hand
role of designer is to provide a safe road environment that should:
• provide adequate information for road users of the layout and conditions ahead;
• provide adequate warning of hazards or unusual layouts ahead;
• provide positive control of road users passage through conflict points or unusual sections;
• provide a road performance that can nullify road user’s errors or inappropriate behavior
Desirable minimum Design Standards should be used wherever possible and advance
information and warning should be used to inform road users of the layout ahead. However,
driver overload must be avoided as it may cause road users to focus too much on the
unimportant data and shed vital information. Conflicting information, an overabundance of road
signs or a lack of delineation can cause overload. Therefore a “safer” road environment can be
defined as a layout that:
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 12: Road Safety Audit
It is important that a road improvement caters for all road users. Often the needs of the
motorist are incorporated within a scheme whilst the needs of the vulnerable user are ignored.
The vulnerable road users that need to be considered are: pedestrians – the old, young and
those with mobility or sight impairment; cyclists – children, commuters and leisure users; and
motorcyclists.
Each vulnerable road user has different needs from the road network. In the habitation
environment the pedestrian is likely to be the principal user and designs must incorporate safe
crossing locations, adequate visibility to and from the crossings and appropriate lighting. In
addition to the needs of vulnerable road users, particular attention should be paid to the needs
of trucks, buses or other specialist vehicles.
Safe road design varies from the urban to the rural road network; and a number of external
factors can create a situation in which a safe road in one location becomes unsafe due to
external factors. These factors can include traffic volumes, population density, noise, or road
user familiarity. The function of a road should be clear to all road users, and a well-planned and
defined road hierarchy can assist in providing a safe road network. The design speed can also be
an important factor in influencing the safety of a road and should be appropriate to the location,
local road users and level of private access control.
One important aspect to the safety of junctions is that layout as well as control method need to
be simple and clear, with defined priorities for all road users. The assumption that ‘straight on’
traffic has priority is widely accepted and it needs to be remembered that alterations to this,
despite reinforcement with signs and lines can still be confusing if visual clues such as fences,
kerbing or lighting remain unchanged. It is important to attempt to make any minor approach
perpendicular to the main road. Y-junctions with acute angles should be avoided. These angled
junctions pose problem for road users, including restriction of forward and side visibility.
Similarly, it is advisable to avoid intersections on the inside of bends as foliage often encroaches
into sight lines after several years. Roundabouts used as a form of junction control have their
own rules and design requirements. One of the primary requirements in good roundabout
design is that the radius is tighter on the entry than the exit. This ensures a slow entry and lower
circulating speed. Visibility is a key requirement for all junction types, all road users need to see
and be seen by others. Care should be taken with fixing street furniture and vegetation within
visibility splays. Vulnerable road users often experience difficulties during crossing at junctions.
It is important that their needs are provided for and that safe crossing places are implemented
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 12: Road Safety Audit
where required.
The relationship between cross-sectional elements (carriageway, shoulders, etc.) and safety is
affected by the type and volume of traffic, and also by the surrounding environment. Lane
widths can be critical in affecting safety, where they are too narrow vehicles may collide on
horizontal curves, and there may also be inadequate space for two wheeled vehicles. Where
lane widths are too wide the alignment may encourage excess speed. On high speed links there
is a safety benefit to be gained by the provision of a hard shoulder and central reserve gaps
should be of adequate width, depending on the size of vehicles turning. Vehicles parked on the
carriageway affect the road environment, layout and consequently safety. Safety problems
experienced with parked vehicles are:
• parked vehicles causing physical obstructions which are sideswiped or run into
• parked vehicles causing sudden braking or nose-to-tail shunts
• parked vehicles which deflect oncoming vehicles into adjacent vehicle paths
• parked vehicles blocking visibility for any road user
• parked vehicles between which pedestrians emerge
To reduce the risk of parked vehicles contributing to an accident it is important that designs
should minimize parking in main traffic lanes. Trees and foliage can greatly enhance the
environmental impact of the street scene. However, left un-maintained, they can also restrict
visibility considerably. In addition to this, saplings grow into large trees, which can provide an
unforgiving road hazard in the event of a road traffic accident.
With the above discussions and study / analysis of the project road sections safety issues that
have been conceived are presented below in Table 12.1.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 12: Road Safety Audit
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 12: Road Safety Audit
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 12: Road Safety Audit
The average annual rainfall is 2818mm. The monsoon starts late in June and
generally lasts up-to September. 90% of the rainfall received from July to
September.
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 12: Road Safety Audit
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 12: Road Safety Audit
Footpaths In very few locations, footpaths are In built-up areas and major Footpaths are provided for
observed along the existing road intersections footpaths are provided smooth and safe
of width 1.0m movement of pedestrian
Pedestrian No pedestrian crossings are Pedestrian crossings are provided at Installation of proper traffic
Crossings observed along the existing road. major intersections and other sign/ signal near pedestrian
locations like schools, religious crossings is mandatory.
structure etc. where substantial Pedestrian guard rails are
conflicts exist between Vehicular and also required to guide
Pedestrian movement people
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 12: Road Safety Audit
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 12: Road Safety Audit
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 12: Road Safety Audit
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 12: Road Safety Audit
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 12: Road Safety Audit
Signs/ Markings Insufficient signs found on existing Traffic Signs and Road Markings are
A5. Signs road. Markings are not found in the provided on the proposed road for
and Lighting existing road except some few safe guidance of traffic
stretches in the forest area
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 12: Road Safety Audit
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Chapter 13: Conclusion and Recommendations
CHAPTER 13
13.1 Conclusions
(i) The road section is from Dokmoka (Km 65+923) to Loring Thepi Village (KM 80+930).
(ii) Concession period of the road project is 30 yrs including 36 months construction period.
(iii) All the traffic moving on the project road is through traffic.
(iv) The project road is being developed to improve the connectivity of the surrounding area
and connectivity is the guiding factor for developing this section. The road stretches
from Daboka to Dimapur via Dokmoka, Bokalia, Manja and Lahoroijan will be improved
manifold if the project road is developed.
13.2 Recommendations
The proposed project road being developed as four lane carriageway configuration for 15.007
Km is not recommended under BOT mode.
The proposed project can, however, be considered under other options as under
➢ EPC Construction
Major Junctions
Existing
Sl No. Road Segment Side Lat Long Remarks
Chainage
Daboka to Lahorijan Section
1 39+500 NH 29 Both 26.115736° 92.874705° Daboka Junction
2 85+380 NH 29 RHS 26.090960° 93.139100° To Howraghat
3 128+350 NH 29 RHS 25.970065° 93.436741° To Diphu
Numaligarh to Khatkhati Section
1 9+250 NH 129 LHS 26.571624° 93.768052° To NRL
2 16+400 NH 129 LHS 26.553196° 93.829532° To NRL
3 28+020 NH 129 LHS 26.503455° 93.917874° To Golaghat
4 51+050 NH 129 LHS 26.332086° 93.865281° Silanijan
5 83+620 NH 129 RHS 26.070564° 93.778027° Sariajan
Bokajan Railway
6 89+350 NH 129 LHS 26.024587° 93.763210°
Station
Annexure 2.1
Page 1 of 1
Major Junctions
Existing
Sl No. Road Segment Side Lat Long Remarks
Chainage
Daboka to Lahorijan Section
Section 1
1 38+500 NH 29 Both 26.115736° 92.874705° Daboka Junction
Annexure 4.1
Page 1 of 39
Annexure 4.1 : Data Obtained through Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD)
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Annexure 6.1: Typical Cross Section
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Annexure 6.1: Typical Cross Section
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Annexure 6.1: Typical Cross Section
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Annexure 6.1: Typical Cross Section
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Annexure 6.1: Typical Cross Section
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Annexure 6.1: Typical Cross Section
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Annexure 6.1: Typical Cross Section
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Annexure 6.1: Typical Cross Section
Document: 1718-081/TRB/FDPR/P2/S-3/REP-01
Annexure 6.1: Typical Cross Section
DAB-MAN 1 VSPL
Annexure 6.3A: Vertical Alignment Report (LME)
PVI Grade Chainage(m) Level(m)
Diff. in Type Of
PVI K Value
Chainage Level Curve IN OUT Grade (%) Start of End of Curve
Start of Curve End of Curve
(m) (m) Length (%) (%) Curve Curve
Section-3
1 65+971.466 82.315 60 -0.501 0.323 0.824 65+941.466 66+001.466 82.465 82.412 Sag 72.8
2 66+129.723 82.826 125 0.323 -0.305 -0.628 66+067.223 66+192.223 82.624 82.635 Hog 198.927
3 66+337.266 82.192 120 -0.305 0.33 0.635 66+277.266 66+397.266 82.375 82.39 Sag 188.823
4 66+537.547 82.853 150 0.33 -0.296 -0.626 66+462.547 66+612.547 82.605 82.631 Hog 239.628
5 66+722.385 82.306 120 -0.296 0.301 0.597 66+662.385 66+782.385 82.484 82.487 Sag 201.059
6 66+931.754 82.936 120 0.301 -0.3 -0.601 66+871.754 66+991.754 82.755 82.756 Hog 199.849
7 67+041.252 82.608 90 -0.3 0.315 0.615 66+996.252 67+086.252 82.743 82.75 Sag 146.44
8 67+173.935 83.026 120 0.315 -0.299 -0.614 67+113.935 67+233.935 82.837 82.846 Hog 195.306
9 67+284.830 82.694 90 -0.299 0.677 0.976 67+239.830 67+329.830 82.829 82.999 Sag 92.182
10 67+454.119 83.84 65 0.677 0 -0.677 67+421.619 67+486.619 83.62 83.84 Hog 96.019
11 67+567.646 83.84 65 0 -0.826 -0.826 67+535.146 67+600.146 83.84 83.571 Hog 78.658
12 67+713.708 82.633 105 -0.826 0.3 1.126 67+661.208 67+766.208 83.067 82.791 Sag 93.211
13 68+004.598 83.506 80 0.3 -0.297 -0.597 67+964.598 68+044.598 83.386 83.387 Hog 133.999
14 68+086.442 83.263 80 -0.297 0.302 0.599 68+046.442 68+126.442 83.382 83.384 Sag 133.647
15 68+224.003 83.678 60 0.302 0.377 0.075 68+194.003 68+254.003 83.587 83.791 Sag 801.065
16 68+390.765 84.306 150 0.377 -0.38 -0.757 68+315.765 68+465.765 84.024 84.021 Hog 198.178
17 68+551.686 83.694 80 -0.38 0.83 1.210 68+511.686 68+591.686 83.846 84.026 Sag 66.091
18 68+645.165 84.47 100 0.83 -0.505 -1.335 68+595.165 68+695.165 84.055 84.217 Hog 74.878
19 68+735.000 84.016 70 -0.505 0.872 1.377 68+700.000 68+770.000 84.193 84.321 Sag 50.829
20 68+822.634 84.78 95 0.872 -0.403 -1.275 68+775.134 68+870.134 84.366 84.588 Hog 74.508
21 68+945.145 84.286 60 -0.403 0.314 0.717 68+915.145 68+975.145 84.407 84.38 Sag 83.599
22 69+041.617 84.589 65 0.314 2.05 1.736 69+009.117 69+074.117 84.487 85.256 Sag 37.456
23 69+126.044 86.32 90 2.05 0 -2.050 69+081.044 69+171.044 85.398 86.32 Hog 43.906
24 69+275.313 86.32 75 0 -0.95 -0.950 69+237.813 69+312.813 86.32 85.964 Hog 78.922
25 69+430.000 84.85 95 -0.95 -0.058 0.892 69+382.500 69+477.500 85.301 84.822 Sag 106.502
26 69+588.487 84.758 60 -0.058 0.252 0.310 69+558.487 69+618.487 84.775 84.833 Sag 193.548
27 69+677.292 84.981 60 0.252 0.029 -0.223 69+647.292 69+707.292 84.906 84.99 Hog 269.325
28 69+853.260 85.032 60 0.029 0.106 0.077 69+823.260 69+883.260 85.023 85.064 Sag 773.888
29 70+006.386 85.195 60 0.106 -0.086 -0.192 69+976.386 70+036.386 85.163 85.169 Hog 312.164
30 70+117.162 85.1 60 -0.086 0.323 0.409 70+087.162 70+147.162 85.126 85.197 Sag 146.743
31 70+200.413 85.369 60 0.323 -0.032 -0.355 70+170.413 70+230.413 85.272 85.359 Hog 168.79
32 70+382.778 85.31 60 -0.032 0.233 0.265 70+352.778 70+412.778 85.32 85.38 Sag 226.235
33 70+454.925 85.478 60 0.233 -0.198 -0.431 70+424.925 70+484.925 85.408 85.419 Hog 139.259
34 70+518.392 85.352 60 -0.198 0.4 0.598 70+488.392 70+548.392 85.412 85.472 Sag 100.337
35 70+580.324 85.6 60 0.4 -0.118 -0.518 70+550.324 70+610.324 85.48 85.565 Hog 115.764
36 70+644.633 85.524 60 -0.118 0.108 0.226 70+614.633 70+674.633 85.559 85.556 Sag 264.687
37 70+807.045 85.7 60 0.108 0.267 0.159 70+777.045 70+837.045 85.667 85.78 Sag 378.42
38 70+907.445 85.968 60 0.267 -0.389 -0.656 70+877.445 70+937.445 85.888 85.851 Hog 91.436
39 71+000.184 85.607 60 -0.389 0.032 0.421 70+970.184 71+030.184 85.724 85.616 Sag 142.551
40 71+433.230 85.744 60 0.032 0.524 0.492 71+403.230 71+463.230 85.735 85.901 Sag 121.786
41 71+515.434 86.175 60 0.524 -0.122 -0.646 71+485.434 71+545.434 86.018 86.138 Hog 92.862
42 71+590.136 86.084 60 -0.122 0.425 0.547 71+560.136 71+620.136 86.121 86.211 Sag 109.798
43 71+657.016 86.368 60 0.425 0.262 -0.163 71+627.016 71+687.016 86.241 86.447 Hog 368.933
PVI Grade Chainage(m) Level(m)
Diff. in Type Of
PVI K Value
Chainage Level Curve IN OUT Grade (%) Start of End of Curve
Start of Curve End of Curve
(m) (m) Length (%) (%) Curve Curve
44 71+897.083 86.997 60 0.262 0.559 0.297 71+867.083 71+927.083 86.918 87.165 Sag 202.165
45 71+978.329 87.451 60 0.559 0.348 -0.211 71+948.329 72+008.329 87.283 87.555 Hog 284.526
46 72+314.039 88.619 120 0.348 -0.201 -0.549 72+254.039 72+374.039 88.41 88.498 Hog 218.422
47 72+459.465 88.326 125 -0.201 0.241 0.442 72+396.965 72+521.965 88.452 88.476 Sag 282.756
48 72+786.149 89.112 60 0.241 0.4 0.159 72+756.149 72+816.149 89.04 89.232 Sag 377.269
49 72+888.242 89.52 60 0.4 0 -0.400 72+858.242 72+918.242 89.4 89.52 Hog 150.136
50 73+024.533 89.52 95 0 -0.481 -0.481 72+977.033 73+072.033 89.52 89.292 Hog 197.594
51 73+119.193 89.065 60 -0.481 -0.36 0.121 73+089.193 73+149.193 89.209 88.957 Sag 497.568
52 73+282.961 88.475 70 -0.36 0.302 0.662 73+247.961 73+317.961 88.601 88.581 Sag 105.646
53 73+385.476 88.785 120 0.302 -0.483 -0.785 73+325.476 73+445.476 88.604 88.495 Hog 152.852
54 73+561.163 87.937 60 -0.483 -0.013 0.470 73+531.163 73+591.163 88.082 87.933 Sag 127.833
55 73+831.585 87.901 60 -0.013 -0.241 -0.228 73+801.585 73+861.585 87.905 87.829 Hog 263.903
56 73+931.307 87.661 60 -0.241 0.06 0.301 73+901.307 73+961.307 87.733 87.679 Sag 199.603
57 74+039.772 87.726 60 0.06 -0.266 -0.326 74+009.772 74+069.772 87.708 87.646 Hog 184.347
58 74+174.212 87.369 60 -0.266 0.186 0.452 74+144.212 74+204.212 87.449 87.425 Sag 132.777
59 74+262.760 87.534 60 0.186 -0.027 -0.213 74+232.760 74+292.760 87.478 87.526 Hog 280.646
60 74+885.654 87.363 60 -0.027 0.29 0.317 74+855.654 74+915.654 87.371 87.45 Sag 188.905
61 75+005.585 87.711 60 0.29 -0.048 -0.338 74+975.585 75+035.585 87.624 87.697 Hog 177.439
62 75+120.223 87.656 60 -0.048 0.073 0.121 75+090.223 75+150.223 87.67 87.678 Sag 497.317
63 75+292.233 87.781 60 0.073 0.186 0.113 75+262.233 75+322.233 87.759 87.837 Sag 529.846
64 75+402.501 87.986 60 0.186 0.049 -0.137 75+372.501 75+432.501 87.93 88.001 Hog 438.855
65 75+510.244 88.039 60 0.049 0.254 0.205 75+480.244 75+540.244 88.024 88.115 Sag 292.476
66 75+629.771 88.343 60 0.254 0.641 0.387 75+599.771 75+659.771 88.267 88.535 Sag 155.007
67 75+728.615 88.977 60 0.641 0.302 -0.339 75+698.615 75+758.615 88.785 89.068 Hog 176.743
68 75+794.191 89.175 60 0.302 1.024 0.722 75+764.191 75+824.191 89.084 89.482 Sag 83.055
69 75+924.029 90.505 105 1.024 -0.379 -1.403 75+871.529 75+976.529 89.967 90.306 Hog 74.813
70 76+095.464 89.855 90 -0.379 0.558 0.937 76+050.464 76+140.464 90.026 90.106 Sag 96.003
71 76+207.766 90.482 60 0.558 0 -0.558 76+177.766 76+237.766 90.315 90.482 Hog 107.466
72 76+306.370 90.482 65 0 -0.45 -0.450 76+273.870 76+338.870 90.482 90.336 Hog 144.458
73 76+427.270 89.938 85 -0.45 0.434 0.884 76+384.770 76+469.770 90.129 90.122 Sag 96.165
74 76+543.186 90.441 60 0.434 0.098 -0.336 76+513.186 76+573.186 90.311 90.47 Hog 178.524
75 76+610.639 90.507 60 0.098 0.47 0.372 76+580.639 76+640.639 90.478 90.648 Sag 161.239
76 76+848.631 91.624 40 0.466 0.784 0.318 76+828.631 76+868.631 91.531 91.781 Sag 125.671
77 76+906.474 92.078 60 0.784 -0.418 -1.202 76+876.474 76+936.474 91.843 91.953 Hog 49.922
78 76+970.436 91.811 60 -0.418 0.516 0.934 76+940.436 77+000.436 91.936 91.966 Sag 64.288
79 77+084.289 92.398 100 0.516 0.97 0.454 77+034.289 77+134.289 92.14 92.883 Sag 220.172
80 77+167.454 93.204 60 0.97 0.229 -0.741 77+137.454 77+197.454 92.914 93.273 Hog 80.943
81 77+287.586 93.479 80 0.229 1.009 0.780 77+247.586 77+327.586 93.388 93.883 Sag 102.464
82 77+365.858 94.269 60 1.009 0.403 -0.606 77+335.858 77+395.858 93.966 94.39 Hog 98.986
83 77+495.811 94.793 60 0.403 0.079 -0.324 77+465.811 77+525.811 94.672 94.817 Hog 185.026
84 77+622.563 94.893 70 0.079 0.496 0.417 77+587.563 77+657.563 94.865 95.067 Sag 167.83
85 77+750.691 95.528 80 0.496 -0.032 -0.528 77+710.691 77+790.691 95.33 95.516 Hog 151.498
86 77+860.000 95.493 75 -0.032 0.891 0.923 77+822.562 77+897.438 95.505 95.827 Sag 81.078
87 77+943.152 96.235 85 0.891 0.353 -0.538 77+900.552 77+985.752 95.855 96.385 Hog 158.197
88 78+123.785 96.872 60 0.353 0.739 0.386 78+093.785 78+153.785 96.766 97.094 Sag 155.479
89 78+195.791 97.404 80 0.739 0.366 -0.373 78+155.791 78+235.791 97.108 97.55 Hog 214.458
PVI Grade Chainage(m) Level(m)
Diff. in Type Of
PVI K Value
Chainage Level Curve IN OUT Grade (%) Start of End of Curve
Start of Curve End of Curve
(m) (m) Length (%) (%) Curve Curve
90 78+268.423 97.67 60 0.366 0.704 0.338 78+238.423 78+298.423 97.56 97.881 Sag 177.307
91 78+335.366 98.141 60 0.704 1.075 0.371 78+305.366 78+365.366 97.93 98.463 Sag 161.924
92 78+401.619 98.853 60 1.075 0.607 -0.468 78+371.619 78+431.619 98.531 99.035 Hog 128.167
93 78+514.062 99.535 110 0.607 0.119 -0.488 78+459.109 78+569.015 99.202 99.6 Hog 225.205
94 78+617.856 99.658 70 0.119 0.483 0.364 78+582.856 78+652.856 99.617 99.827 Sag 192.16
95 78+740.064 100.248 70 0.483 0.013 -0.470 78+705.064 78+775.064 100.079 100.253 Hog 149.085
96 78+906.078 100.27 60 0.013 -0.297 -0.310 78+876.078 78+936.078 100.266 100.181 Hog 193.482
97 79+018.190 99.937 80 -0.297 0.156 0.453 78+978.190 79+058.190 100.056 100 Sag 176.743
98 79+328.760 100.421 60 0.156 -0.082 -0.238 79+298.760 79+358.760 100.374 100.396 Hog 251.813
99 79+571.969 100.22 60 -0.082 -0.299 -0.217 79+541.969 79+601.969 100.245 100.131 Hog 277.713
100 79+885.617 99.284 60 -0.299 -0.36 -0.061 79+855.617 79+915.617 99.374 99.176 Hog 969.685
101 80+076.229 98.597 60 -0.36 0.311 0.671 80+046.229 80+106.229 98.705 98.69 Sag 89.363
102 80+254.958 99.153 150 0.311 -0.316 -0.627 80+179.958 80+329.958 98.92 98.916 Hog 239.281
103 80+534.445 98.27 100 -0.316 0.104 0.420 80+484.445 80+584.445 98.428 98.322 Sag 238.191
Annexure 6.3B: Vertical Alignment Report (RME)
PVI Grade Chainage(m) Level(m)
Diff. in Type Of
PVI K Value
Chainage Level Curve IN OUT Grade (%) Start of End of Curve
Start of Curve End of Curve
(m) (m) Length (%) (%) Curve Curve
Section-3
1 65+971.466 82.315 60 -0.501 0.152 0.653 65+941.466 66+001.466 82.465 82.361 Sag 91.886
2 66+115.831 82.534 60 0.152 -0.364 -0.516 66+085.831 66+145.831 82.488 82.425 Hog 116.238
3 66+185.244 82.281 60 -0.364 0.132 0.496 66+155.244 66+215.244 82.39 82.321 Sag 120.757
4 66+260.029 82.38 60 0.132 -0.141 -0.273 66+230.029 66+290.029 82.34 82.338 Hog 219.607
5 66+374.346 82.219 60 -0.141 0.403 0.544 66+344.346 66+404.346 82.261 82.34 Sag 110.27
6 66+504.775 82.745 60 0.403 -0.202 -0.605 66+474.775 66+534.775 82.624 82.684 Hog 99.17
7 66+722.385 82.306 60 -0.202 0.185 0.387 66+692.385 66+752.385 82.367 82.362 Sag 154.99
8 66+960.713 82.748 60 0.185 -0.085 -0.270 66+930.713 66+990.713 82.692 82.722 Hog 221.769
9 67+060.316 82.663 60 -0.085 0.289 0.374 67+030.316 67+090.316 82.689 82.75 Sag 160.558
10 67+147.308 82.914 60 0.289 -0.133 -0.422 67+117.308 67+177.308 82.827 82.874 Hog 142.349
11 67+262.375 82.761 60 -0.133 0.265 0.398 67+232.375 67+292.375 82.801 82.841 Sag 150.764
12 67+374.447 83.058 70 0.265 0.982 0.717 67+339.447 67+409.447 82.965 83.402 Sag 97.695
13 67+454.119 83.84 65 0.982 0 -0.982 67+421.619 67+486.619 83.521 83.84 Hog 66.224
14 67+567.646 83.84 65 0 -0.826 -0.826 67+535.146 67+600.146 83.84 83.571 Hog 78.658
15 67+713.708 82.633 105 -0.826 0.3 1.126 67+661.208 67+766.208 83.067 82.791 Sag 93.209
16 67+849.976 83.042 60 0.3 0.122 -0.178 67+819.976 67+879.976 82.952 83.079 Hog 336.374
17 68+041.319 83.275 60 0.122 0.221 0.099 68+011.319 68+071.319 83.238 83.341 Sag 607.111
18 68+224.003 83.678 60 0.221 0.377 0.156 68+194.003 68+254.003 83.612 83.791 Sag 384.652
19 68+390.765 84.306 105 0.377 -0.38 -0.757 68+338.265 68+443.265 84.108 84.106 Hog 138.725
20 68+551.686 83.694 60 -0.38 0.83 1.210 68+521.686 68+581.686 83.808 83.943 Sag 49.569
21 68+645.165 84.47 100 0.83 -0.505 -1.335 68+595.165 68+695.165 84.055 84.217 Hog 74.878
22 68+735.000 84.016 60 -0.505 0.872 1.377 68+705.000 68+765.000 84.168 84.278 Sag 43.567
23 68+822.634 84.78 95 0.872 -0.403 -1.275 68+775.134 68+870.134 84.366 84.588 Hog 74.508
24 68+945.145 84.286 60 -0.403 0.085 0.488 68+915.145 68+975.145 84.407 84.311 Sag 122.975
25 69+041.985 84.368 65 0.085 2.322 2.237 69+009.485 69+074.485 84.34 85.123 Sag 29.05
26 69+126.044 86.32 90 2.322 0 -2.322 69+081.044 69+171.044 85.275 86.32 Hog 38.757
27 69+275.313 86.32 75 0 -0.95 -0.950 69+237.813 69+312.813 86.32 85.964 Hog 78.922
28 69+430.000 84.85 95 -0.95 -0.058 0.892 69+382.500 69+477.500 85.301 84.822 Sag 106.502
29 69+588.487 84.758 60 -0.058 0.252 0.310 69+558.487 69+618.487 84.775 84.833 Sag 193.548
30 69+677.292 84.981 60 0.252 0.029 -0.223 69+647.292 69+707.292 84.906 84.99 Hog 269.325
31 69+853.260 85.032 60 0.029 0.106 0.077 69+823.260 69+883.260 85.023 85.064 Sag 773.888
32 70+006.386 85.195 60 0.106 -0.086 -0.192 69+976.386 70+036.386 85.163 85.169 Hog 312.164
33 70+117.162 85.1 60 -0.086 0.323 0.409 70+087.162 70+147.162 85.126 85.197 Sag 146.743
34 70+200.413 85.369 60 0.323 -0.032 -0.355 70+170.413 70+230.413 85.272 85.359 Hog 168.79
35 70+382.778 85.31 60 -0.032 0.233 0.265 70+352.778 70+412.778 85.32 85.38 Sag 226.235
36 70+454.925 85.478 60 0.233 -0.198 -0.431 70+424.925 70+484.925 85.408 85.419 Hog 139.259
37 70+518.392 85.352 60 -0.198 0.4 0.598 70+488.392 70+548.392 85.412 85.472 Sag 100.337
38 70+580.324 85.6 60 0.4 -0.118 -0.518 70+550.324 70+610.324 85.48 85.565 Hog 115.764
39 70+644.633 85.524 60 -0.118 0.108 0.226 70+614.633 70+674.633 85.559 85.556 Sag 264.687
40 70+807.045 85.7 60 0.108 0.267 0.159 70+777.045 70+837.045 85.667 85.78 Sag 378.42
41 70+907.445 85.968 60 0.267 -0.389 -0.656 70+877.445 70+937.445 85.888 85.851 Hog 91.436
42 71+000.184 85.607 60 -0.389 0.032 0.421 70+970.184 71+030.184 85.724 85.616 Sag 142.551
43 71+433.230 85.744 60 0.032 0.524 0.492 71+403.230 71+463.230 85.735 85.901 Sag 121.786
PVI Grade Chainage(m) Level(m)
Diff. in Type Of
PVI K Value
Chainage Level Curve IN OUT Grade (%) Start of End of Curve
Start of Curve End of Curve
(m) (m) Length (%) (%) Curve Curve
44 71+515.434 86.175 60 0.524 -0.122 -0.646 71+485.434 71+545.434 86.018 86.138 Hog 92.862
45 71+590.136 86.084 60 -0.122 0.425 0.547 71+560.136 71+620.136 86.121 86.211 Sag 109.798
46 71+657.016 86.368 60 0.425 0.262 -0.163 71+627.016 71+687.016 86.241 86.447 Hog 368.933
47 71+897.083 86.997 60 0.262 0.559 0.297 71+867.083 71+927.083 86.918 87.165 Sag 202.165
48 71+978.329 87.451 60 0.559 0.089 -0.470 71+948.329 72+008.329 87.283 87.478 Hog 127.605
49 72+057.340 87.521 60 0.089 0.521 0.432 72+027.340 72+087.340 87.494 87.677 Sag 138.904
50 72+196.040 88.243 75 0.521 -0.029 -0.550 72+158.540 72+233.540 88.048 88.232 Hog 136.446
51 72+302.489 88.212 60 -0.029 0.426 0.455 72+272.489 72+332.489 88.221 88.34 Sag 131.848
52 72+371.042 88.504 60 0.426 -0.201 -0.627 72+341.042 72+401.042 88.376 88.444 Hog 95.655
53 72+459.465 88.326 60 -0.201 0.241 0.442 72+429.465 72+489.465 88.386 88.398 Sag 135.776
54 72+786.149 89.112 60 0.241 0.4 0.159 72+756.149 72+816.149 89.04 89.232 Sag 377.269
55 72+888.242 89.52 60 0.4 0 -0.400 72+858.242 72+918.242 89.4 89.52 Hog 150.136
56 73+024.533 89.52 95 0 -0.679 -0.679 72+977.033 73+072.033 89.52 89.198 Hog 139.994
57 73+124.592 88.841 60 -0.679 -0.084 0.595 73+094.592 73+154.592 89.045 88.816 Sag 100.915
58 73+203.125 88.775 60 -0.084 -0.377 -0.293 73+173.125 73+233.125 88.8 88.662 Hog 205.021
59 73+276.394 88.499 60 -0.377 0.045 0.422 73+246.394 73+306.394 88.612 88.512 Sag 142.351
60 73+430.413 88.568 60 0.045 -0.482 -0.527 73+400.413 73+460.413 88.555 88.423 Hog 113.789
61 73+570.311 87.893 90 -0.482 0.303 0.785 73+525.311 73+615.311 88.11 88.029 Sag 114.644
62 73+795.731 88.575 250 0.303 -0.319 -0.622 73+670.731 73+920.731 88.197 88.177 Hog 402.404
63 74+184.474 87.336 140 -0.319 0.306 0.625 74+114.474 74+254.474 87.559 87.55 Sag 224.134
64 74+436.512 88.107 150 0.306 -0.349 -0.655 74+361.512 74+511.512 87.878 87.845 Hog 229.03
65 74+626.181 87.445 150 -0.349 0.296 0.645 74+551.181 74+701.181 87.707 87.667 Sag 232.5
66 74+864.926 88.152 150 0.296 -0.194 -0.490 74+789.926 74+939.926 87.93 88.006 Hog 305.863
67 75+120.223 87.656 120 -0.194 0.306 0.500 75+060.223 75+180.223 87.773 87.84 Sag 239.736
68 75+418.981 88.571 140 0.306 -0.304 -0.610 75+348.981 75+488.981 88.357 88.358 Hog 229.434
69 75+579.544 88.083 120 -0.304 0.588 0.892 75+519.544 75+639.544 88.265 88.436 Sag 134.499
70 75+734.573 88.995 60 0.588 0.797 0.209 75+704.573 75+764.573 88.819 89.234 Sag 287.418
71 75+924.029 90.505 105 0.797 -0.379 -1.176 75+871.529 75+976.529 90.087 90.306 Hog 89.272
72 76+095.464 89.855 90 -0.379 0.558 0.937 76+050.464 76+140.464 90.026 90.106 Sag 96.003
73 76+207.766 90.482 60 0.558 0 -0.558 76+177.766 76+237.766 90.315 90.482 Hog 107.466
74 76+306.370 90.482 65 0 -0.45 -0.450 76+273.870 76+338.870 90.482 90.336 Hog 144.458
75 76+427.270 89.938 85 -0.45 0.434 0.884 76+384.770 76+469.770 90.129 90.122 Sag 96.165
76 76+531.786 90.392 60 0.434 0.3 -0.134 76+501.786 76+561.786 90.261 90.482 Hog 447.611
77 76+681.787 90.841 60 0.3 0.47 0.170 76+651.787 76+711.787 90.751 90.982 Sag 352.79
78 76+848.631 91.624 40 0.466 0.784 0.318 76+828.631 76+868.631 91.531 91.781 Sag 125.671
79 76+906.474 92.078 60 0.784 -0.418 -1.202 76+876.474 76+936.474 91.843 91.953 Hog 49.922
80 76+970.436 91.811 60 -0.418 0.516 0.934 76+940.436 77+000.436 91.936 91.966 Sag 64.288
81 77+084.289 92.398 100 0.516 0.97 0.454 77+034.289 77+134.289 92.14 92.883 Sag 220.172
82 77+167.454 93.204 60 0.97 0.302 -0.668 77+137.454 77+197.454 92.914 93.295 Hog 89.901
83 77+300.139 93.606 80 0.302 1.009 0.707 77+260.139 77+340.139 93.485 94.009 Sag 113.171
84 77+383.043 94.443 60 1.009 0.344 -0.665 77+353.043 77+413.043 94.14 94.546 Hog 90.179
85 77+754.349 95.72 80 0.344 -0.303 -0.647 77+714.349 77+794.349 95.582 95.599 Hog 123.666
86 77+852.151 95.423 75 -0.303 0.891 1.194 77+814.714 77+889.589 95.537 95.757 Sag 62.691
87 77+943.152 96.235 85 0.891 0.353 -0.538 77+900.552 77+985.752 95.855 96.385 Hog 158.197
88 78+123.785 96.872 60 0.353 0.739 0.386 78+093.785 78+153.785 96.766 97.094 Sag 155.479
89 78+195.791 97.404 80 0.739 0.366 -0.373 78+155.791 78+235.791 97.108 97.55 Hog 214.458
PVI Grade Chainage(m) Level(m)
Diff. in Type Of
PVI K Value
Chainage Level Curve IN OUT Grade (%) Start of End of Curve
Start of Curve End of Curve
(m) (m) Length (%) (%) Curve Curve
90 78+268.423 97.67 60 0.366 0.704 0.338 78+238.423 78+298.423 97.56 97.881 Sag 177.307
91 78+335.366 98.141 60 0.704 1.075 0.371 78+305.366 78+365.366 97.93 98.463 Sag 161.924
92 78+401.619 98.853 60 1.075 0.607 -0.468 78+371.619 78+431.619 98.531 99.035 Hog 128.167
93 78+514.062 99.535 110 0.607 0.299 -0.308 78+459.109 78+569.015 99.202 99.699 Hog 357.626
94 78+832.568 100.488 100 0.299 -0.297 -0.596 78+782.568 78+882.568 100.338 100.34 Hog 167.8
95 79+018.190 99.937 80 -0.297 0.3 0.597 78+978.190 79+058.190 100.056 100.057 Sag 134.036
96 79+341.667 100.908 250 0.3 -0.299 -0.599 79+216.667 79+466.667 100.533 100.535 Hog 417.59
97 79+885.617 99.284 60 -0.299 -0.36 -0.061 79+855.617 79+915.617 99.374 99.176 Hog 969.912
98 80+068.525 98.625 60 -0.36 -0.07 0.290 80+038.525 80+098.525 98.733 98.604 Sag 206.807
99 80+320.000 98.448 90 -0.07 0.159 0.229 80+275.000 80+365.000 98.48 98.519 Sag 392.821
100 80+450.131 98.655 100 0.159 -0.047 -0.206 80+400.131 80+500.131 98.575 98.631 Hog 485.731
101 80+749.086 98.514 80 -0.047 0.096 0.143 80+709.086 80+789.086 98.533 98.553 Sag 557.727
Annexure 6.4
Page 1 of 7
Km 138.45 14.34
Km 138.45 14.34
Km 138.45 6.32
Annexure 6.4
Page 2 of 7
Year Bus LCV 2 Axle 3 Axle MAV Total yearly Cummulative Yearly Cummulative Design
MSA
CVs (nos.) yearly CVs (nos.) Design ESA Design ESA year
VDF 1.92 2.40 6.93 9.46 13.07
2018 263 451 164 74 65
2019 283 483 176 79 70
2020 305 517 189 85 75
2021 328 554 202 91 80 4,57,827 4,57,827 7,20,016 7,20,016 0.72 1
2022 352 594 217 97 85 4,90,793 9,48,620 7,70,978 14,90,994 1.49 2
2023 379 636 232 103 91 5,26,140 14,74,761 8,25,556 23,16,550 2.32 3
2024 407 682 249 110 97 5,64,041 20,38,801 8,84,007 32,00,557 3.20 4
2025 437 731 267 118 104 6,04,680 26,43,481 9,46,606 41,47,163 4.15 5
2026 463 776 284 125 110 6,41,114 32,84,595 10,03,397 51,50,559 5.15 6
2027 490 823 301 132 116 6,79,748 39,64,343 10,63,602 62,14,161 6.21 7
2028 518 874 320 139 123 7,20,718 46,85,061 11,27,427 73,41,588 7.34 8
2029 548 928 340 148 130 7,64,162 54,49,223 11,95,090 85,36,678 8.54 9
2030 580 985 361 156 138 8,10,233 62,59,456 12,66,821 98,03,500 9.80 10
2031 610 1040 381 164 144 8,53,812 71,13,267 13,33,484 1,11,36,984 11.14 11
2032 642 1098 402 171 151 8,99,744 80,13,012 14,03,675 1,25,40,659 12.54 12
2033 675 1160 425 180 159 9,48,158 89,61,169 14,77,580 1,40,18,239 14.02 13
2034 710 1224 448 188 166 9,99,186 99,60,356 15,55,399 1,55,73,638 15.57 14
2035 747 1293 474 197 174 10,52,972 1,10,13,328 16,37,338 1,72,10,976 17.21 15
2036 786 1365 500 207 183 11,09,664 1,21,22,992 17,23,618 1,89,34,594 18.93 16
2037 827 1441 528 217 191 11,69,421 1,32,92,413 18,14,469 2,07,49,062 20.75 17
2038 870 1521 558 227 201 12,32,407 1,45,24,820 19,10,134 2,26,59,196 22.66 18
2039 915 1606 589 238 210 12,98,799 1,58,23,618 20,10,870 2,46,70,067 24.67 19
2040 963 1696 622 249 220 13,68,780 1,71,92,398 21,16,948 2,67,87,015 26.79 20
2041 1013 1790 657 261 231 14,42,546 1,86,34,944 22,28,651 2,90,15,666 29.02 21
2042 1065 1890 693 274 242 15,20,302 2,01,55,246 23,46,280 3,13,61,946 31.36 22
2043 1121 1996 732 287 253 16,02,264 2,17,57,510 24,70,150 3,38,32,096 33.83 23
2044 1179 2107 773 301 266 16,88,660 2,34,46,170 26,00,594 3,64,32,690 36.43 24
2045 1240 2225 817 315 278 17,79,731 2,52,25,901 27,37,963 3,91,70,653 39.17 25
2046 1305 2349 862 331 292 18,75,732 2,71,01,633 28,82,625 4,20,53,278 42.05 26
2047 1373 2481 911 346 306 19,76,928 2,90,78,561 30,34,971 4,50,88,249 45.09 27
2048 1444 2619 962 363 320 20,83,602 3,11,62,163 31,95,410 4,82,83,659 48.28 28
2049 1519 2766 1015 380 336 21,96,053 3,33,58,216 33,64,374 5,16,48,033 51.65 29
2050 1598 2920 1072 399 352 23,14,592 3,56,72,808 35,42,318 5,51,90,351 55.19 30
Annexure 6.4
Page 3 of 7
Year Bus LCV 2 Axle 3 Axle MAV Total yearly Cummulative Yearly Cummulative Design
MSA
CVs (nos.) yearly CVs (nos.) Design ESA Design ESA year
VDF 1.92 2.40 6.93 9.46 13.07
2018 284 488 182 83 72
2019 306 523 195 89 77
2020 329 560 209 96 83
2021 354 601 224 102 88 4,99,558 4,99,558 7,92,665 7,92,665 0.79 1
2022 380 643 240 109 94 5,35,528 10,35,086 8,48,759 16,41,424 1.64 2
2023 409 690 257 116 101 5,74,096 16,09,182 9,08,832 25,50,256 2.55 3
2024 440 739 276 124 107 6,15,450 22,24,632 9,73,167 35,23,423 3.52 4
2025 473 792 296 133 115 6,59,791 28,84,422 10,42,067 45,65,490 4.57 5
2026 500 841 314 140 121 6,99,553 35,83,975 11,04,585 56,70,075 5.67 6
2027 529 892 334 149 128 7,41,717 43,25,692 11,70,861 68,40,935 6.84 7
2028 560 947 354 157 136 7,86,428 51,12,120 12,41,121 80,82,056 8.08 8
2029 592 1006 376 166 144 8,33,842 59,45,962 13,15,606 93,97,662 9.40 9
2030 626 1068 400 176 152 8,84,121 68,30,082 13,94,569 1,07,92,232 10.79 10
2031 659 1128 422 184 159 9,31,670 77,61,752 14,67,927 1,22,60,158 12.26 11
2032 693 1190 446 193 167 9,81,786 87,43,539 15,45,164 1,38,05,323 13.81 12
2033 729 1257 471 202 175 10,34,609 97,78,148 16,26,489 1,54,31,811 15.43 13
2034 767 1327 497 212 184 10,90,285 1,08,68,433 17,12,116 1,71,43,927 17.14 14
2035 807 1401 525 222 192 11,48,969 1,20,17,402 18,02,277 1,89,46,204 18.95 15
2036 849 1479 554 233 202 12,10,824 1,32,28,226 18,97,211 2,08,43,416 20.84 16
2037 893 1562 585 244 211 12,76,020 1,45,04,246 19,97,173 2,28,40,589 22.84 17
2038 940 1649 618 256 221 13,44,741 1,58,48,987 21,02,430 2,49,43,019 24.94 18
2039 989 1741 653 268 232 14,17,176 1,72,66,163 22,13,265 2,71,56,284 27.16 19
2040 1040 1838 689 281 243 14,93,527 1,87,59,690 23,29,974 2,94,86,258 29.49 20
2041 1094 1941 728 295 255 15,74,007 2,03,33,697 24,52,869 3,19,39,127 31.94 21
2042 1151 2049 769 309 267 16,58,838 2,19,92,535 25,82,281 3,45,21,408 34.52 22
2043 1211 2164 812 324 280 17,48,258 2,37,40,794 27,18,557 3,72,39,965 37.24 23
2044 1274 2285 857 339 293 18,42,516 2,55,83,309 28,62,062 4,01,02,027 40.10 24
2045 1340 2412 905 355 307 19,41,872 2,75,25,182 30,13,183 4,31,15,210 43.12 25
2046 1410 2547 956 372 322 20,46,605 2,95,71,787 31,72,324 4,62,87,534 46.29 26
2047 1483 2689 1009 390 338 21,57,006 3,17,28,793 33,39,914 4,96,27,447 49.63 27
2048 1560 2840 1066 409 354 22,73,383 3,40,02,177 35,16,403 5,31,43,850 53.14 28
2049 1641 2998 1126 429 371 23,96,060 3,63,98,236 37,02,266 5,68,46,116 56.85 29
2050 1727 3166 1189 449 389 25,25,378 3,89,23,615 38,98,003 6,07,44,119 60.74 30
Annexure 6.4
Page 4 of 7
Year Bus LCV 2 Axle 3 Axle MAV Total yearly Cummulative Yearly Cummulative Design
MSA
CVs (nos.) yearly CVs (nos.) Design ESA Design ESA year
VDF 1.92 2.40 6.93 9.46 13.07
2018 217 376 137 62 54
2019 234 403 147 67 58
2020 252 432 157 71 62
2021 271 463 168 76 66 3,81,275 3,81,275 5,99,741 5,99,741 0.60 1
2022 291 496 181 81 70 4,08,740 7,90,015 6,42,201 12,41,942 1.24 2
2023 313 532 194 87 75 4,38,190 12,28,205 6,87,674 19,29,616 1.93 3
2024 336 570 208 93 80 4,69,766 16,97,971 7,36,374 26,65,991 2.67 4
2025 362 611 223 99 86 5,03,625 22,01,596 7,88,531 34,54,521 3.45 5
2026 383 648 236 105 91 5,33,985 27,35,582 8,35,853 42,90,374 4.29 6
2027 405 688 251 111 96 5,66,181 33,01,763 8,86,020 51,76,394 5.18 7
2028 428 731 267 117 102 6,00,322 39,02,084 9,39,204 61,15,598 6.12 8
2029 453 776 283 124 107 6,36,526 45,38,611 9,95,586 71,11,183 7.11 9
2030 480 824 301 131 114 6,74,919 52,13,530 10,55,359 81,66,542 8.17 10
2031 504 870 317 138 119 7,11,236 59,24,766 11,10,910 92,77,452 9.28 11
2032 531 918 335 144 125 7,49,515 66,74,281 11,69,401 1,04,46,853 10.45 12
2033 558 970 354 151 131 7,89,862 74,64,143 12,30,988 1,16,77,841 11.68 13
2034 587 1024 374 159 137 8,32,389 82,96,532 12,95,837 1,29,73,678 12.97 14
2035 618 1081 395 166 144 8,77,214 91,73,746 13,64,120 1,43,37,798 14.34 15
2036 650 1141 417 174 151 9,24,462 1,00,98,207 14,36,021 1,57,73,818 15.77 16
2037 684 1205 440 182 158 9,74,264 1,10,72,471 15,11,732 1,72,85,550 17.29 17
2038 719 1272 465 191 165 10,26,759 1,20,99,230 15,91,455 1,88,77,006 18.88 18
2039 757 1343 491 200 173 10,82,092 1,31,81,321 16,75,406 2,05,52,412 20.55 19
2040 796 1418 518 210 182 11,40,418 1,43,21,739 17,63,808 2,23,16,220 22.32 20
2041 837 1498 547 220 190 12,01,899 1,55,23,638 18,56,900 2,41,73,120 24.17 21
2042 881 1581 578 231 200 12,66,706 1,67,90,344 19,54,930 2,61,28,050 26.13 22
2043 927 1669 610 242 209 13,35,019 1,81,25,363 20,58,163 2,81,86,212 28.19 23
2044 975 1763 645 253 219 14,07,029 1,95,32,392 21,66,875 3,03,53,087 30.35 24
2045 1026 1861 681 265 230 14,82,937 2,10,15,329 22,81,359 3,26,34,446 32.63 25
2046 1079 1965 719 278 241 15,62,954 2,25,78,283 24,01,923 3,50,36,369 35.04 26
2047 1135 2075 759 292 252 16,47,302 2,42,25,585 25,28,891 3,75,65,259 37.57 27
2048 1194 2191 802 306 264 17,36,218 2,59,61,803 26,62,605 4,02,27,864 40.23 28
2049 1256 2313 846 320 277 18,29,948 2,77,91,751 28,03,425 4,30,31,289 43.03 29
2050 1322 2443 894 336 290 19,28,756 2,97,20,507 29,51,730 4,59,83,019 45.98 30
Annexure 6.4
Page 5 of 7
Year Bus LCV 2 Axle 3 Axle MAV Total yearly Cummulative Yearly Cummulative Design
MSA
CVs (nos.) yearly CVs (nos.) Design ESA Design ESA year
VDF 1.07 1.17 2.59 3.52 5.97
2018 263 451 164 74 65
2019 283 483 176 79 70
2020 305 517 189 85 75
2021 328 554 202 91 80 4,57,827 4,57,827 3,17,285 3,17,285 0.32 1
2022 352 594 217 97 85 4,90,793 9,48,620 3,39,791 6,57,076 0.66 2
2023 379 636 232 103 91 5,26,140 14,74,761 3,63,897 10,20,973 1.02 3
2024 407 682 249 110 97 5,64,041 20,38,801 3,89,718 14,10,691 1.41 4
2025 437 731 267 118 104 6,04,680 26,43,481 4,17,376 18,28,067 1.83 5
2026 463 776 284 125 110 6,41,114 32,84,595 4,42,389 22,70,455 2.27 6
2027 490 823 301 132 116 6,79,748 39,64,343 4,68,904 27,39,359 2.74 7
2028 518 874 320 139 123 7,20,718 46,85,061 4,97,012 32,36,371 3.24 8
2029 548 928 340 148 130 7,64,162 54,49,223 5,26,808 37,63,179 3.76 9
2030 580 985 361 156 138 8,10,233 62,59,456 5,58,394 43,21,573 4.32 10
2031 610 1040 381 164 144 8,53,812 71,13,267 5,87,783 49,09,356 4.91 11
2032 642 1098 402 171 151 8,99,744 80,13,012 6,18,727 55,28,082 5.53 12
2033 675 1160 425 180 159 9,48,158 89,61,169 6,51,309 61,79,391 6.18 13
2034 710 1224 448 188 166 9,99,186 99,60,356 6,85,615 68,65,006 6.87 14
2035 747 1293 474 197 174 10,52,972 1,10,13,328 7,21,739 75,86,745 7.59 15
2036 786 1365 500 207 183 11,09,664 1,21,22,992 7,59,776 83,46,521 8.35 16
2037 827 1441 528 217 191 11,69,421 1,32,92,413 7,99,828 91,46,350 9.15 17
2038 870 1521 558 227 201 12,32,407 1,45,24,820 8,42,003 99,88,353 9.99 18
2039 915 1606 589 238 210 12,98,799 1,58,23,618 8,86,414 1,08,74,766 10.87 19
2040 963 1696 622 249 220 13,68,780 1,71,92,398 9,33,179 1,18,07,945 11.81 20
2041 1013 1790 657 261 231 14,42,546 1,86,34,944 9,82,424 1,27,90,369 12.79 21
2042 1065 1890 693 274 242 15,20,302 2,01,55,246 10,34,281 1,38,24,650 13.82 22
2043 1121 1996 732 287 253 16,02,264 2,17,57,510 10,88,890 1,49,13,540 14.91 23
2044 1179 2107 773 301 266 16,88,660 2,34,46,170 11,46,397 1,60,59,937 16.06 24
2045 1240 2225 817 315 278 17,79,731 2,52,25,901 12,06,956 1,72,66,893 17.27 25
2046 1305 2349 862 331 292 18,75,732 2,71,01,633 12,70,731 1,85,37,623 18.54 26
2047 1373 2481 911 346 306 19,76,928 2,90,78,561 13,37,892 1,98,75,515 19.88 27
2048 1444 2619 962 363 320 20,83,602 3,11,62,163 14,08,621 2,12,84,136 21.28 28
2049 1519 2766 1015 380 336 21,96,053 3,33,58,216 14,83,108 2,27,67,244 22.77 29
2050 1598 2920 1072 399 352 23,14,592 3,56,72,808 15,61,553 2,43,28,797 24.33 30
Annexure 6.4
Page 6 of 7
Year Bus LCV 2 Axle 3 Axle MAV Total yearly Cummulative Yearly Cummulative Design
MSA
CVs (nos.) yearly CVs (nos.) Design ESA Design ESA year
VDF 1.07 1.17 2.59 3.52 5.97
2018 284 488 182 83 72
2019 306 523 195 89 77
2020 329 560 209 96 83
2021 354 601 224 102 88 4,99,558 4,99,558 3,48,646 3,48,646 0.35 1
2022 380 643 240 109 94 5,35,528 10,35,086 3,73,372 7,22,019 0.72 2
2023 409 690 257 116 101 5,74,096 16,09,182 3,99,856 11,21,875 1.12 3
2024 440 739 276 124 107 6,15,450 22,24,632 4,28,223 15,50,098 1.55 4
2025 473 792 296 133 115 6,59,791 28,84,422 4,58,608 20,08,706 2.01 5
2026 500 841 314 140 121 6,99,553 35,83,975 4,86,092 24,94,798 2.49 6
2027 529 892 334 149 128 7,41,717 43,25,692 5,15,227 30,10,026 3.01 7
2028 560 947 354 157 136 7,86,428 51,12,120 5,46,113 35,56,138 3.56 8
2029 592 1006 376 166 144 8,33,842 59,45,962 5,78,853 41,34,991 4.13 9
2030 626 1068 400 176 152 8,84,121 68,30,082 6,13,559 47,48,550 4.75 10
2031 659 1128 422 184 159 9,31,670 77,61,752 6,45,840 53,94,390 5.39 11
2032 693 1190 446 193 167 9,81,786 87,43,539 6,79,828 60,74,219 6.07 12
2033 729 1257 471 202 175 10,34,609 97,78,148 7,15,615 67,89,833 6.79 13
2034 767 1327 497 212 184 10,90,285 1,08,68,433 7,53,295 75,43,129 7.54 14
2035 807 1401 525 222 192 11,48,969 1,20,17,402 7,92,970 83,36,099 8.34 15
2036 849 1479 554 233 202 12,10,824 1,32,28,226 8,34,746 91,70,845 9.17 16
2037 893 1562 585 244 211 12,76,020 1,45,04,246 8,78,735 1,00,49,580 10.05 17
2038 940 1649 618 256 221 13,44,741 1,58,48,987 9,25,053 1,09,74,633 10.97 18
2039 989 1741 653 268 232 14,17,176 1,72,66,163 9,73,826 1,19,48,459 11.95 19
2040 1040 1838 689 281 243 14,93,527 1,87,59,690 10,25,184 1,29,73,643 12.97 20
2041 1094 1941 728 295 255 15,74,007 2,03,33,697 10,79,264 1,40,52,907 14.05 21
2042 1151 2049 769 309 267 16,58,838 2,19,92,535 11,36,212 1,51,89,119 15.19 22
2043 1211 2164 812 324 280 17,48,258 2,37,40,794 11,96,180 1,63,85,299 16.39 23
2044 1274 2285 857 339 293 18,42,516 2,55,83,309 12,59,330 1,76,44,628 17.64 24
2045 1340 2412 905 355 307 19,41,872 2,75,25,182 13,25,830 1,89,70,458 18.97 25
2046 1410 2547 956 372 322 20,46,605 2,95,71,787 13,95,859 2,03,66,317 20.37 26
2047 1483 2689 1009 390 338 21,57,006 3,17,28,793 14,69,607 2,18,35,924 21.84 27
2048 1560 2840 1066 409 354 22,73,383 3,40,02,177 15,47,270 2,33,83,194 23.38 28
2049 1641 2998 1126 429 371 23,96,060 3,63,98,236 16,29,057 2,50,12,251 25.01 29
2050 1727 3166 1189 449 389 25,25,378 3,89,23,615 17,15,190 2,67,27,441 26.73 30
Annexure 6.4
Page 7 of 7
Year Bus LCV 2 Axle 3 Axle MAV Total yearly Cummulative Yearly Cummulative Design
MSA
CVs (nos.) yearly CVs (nos.) Design ESA Design ESA year
VDF 1.07 1.17 2.59 3.52 5.97
2018 217 376 137 62 54
2019 234 403 147 67 58
2020 252 432 157 71 62
2021 271 463 168 76 66 3,81,275 3,81,275 2,64,151 2,64,151 0.26 1
2022 291 496 181 81 70 4,08,740 7,90,015 2,82,893 5,47,044 0.55 2
2023 313 532 194 87 75 4,38,190 12,28,205 3,02,968 8,50,012 0.85 3
2024 336 570 208 93 80 4,69,766 16,97,971 3,24,472 11,74,484 1.17 4
2025 362 611 223 99 86 5,03,625 22,01,596 3,47,505 15,21,989 1.52 5
2026 383 648 236 105 91 5,33,985 27,35,582 3,68,338 18,90,327 1.89 6
2027 405 688 251 111 96 5,66,181 33,01,763 3,90,422 22,80,749 2.28 7
2028 428 731 267 117 102 6,00,322 39,02,084 4,13,833 26,94,583 2.69 8
2029 453 776 283 124 107 6,36,526 45,38,611 4,38,651 31,33,234 3.13 9
2030 480 824 301 131 114 6,74,919 52,13,530 4,64,960 35,98,193 3.60 10
2031 504 870 317 138 119 7,11,236 59,24,766 4,89,439 40,87,632 4.09 11
2032 531 918 335 144 125 7,49,515 66,74,281 5,15,214 46,02,847 4.60 12
2033 558 970 354 151 131 7,89,862 74,64,143 5,42,354 51,45,201 5.15 13
2034 587 1024 374 159 137 8,32,389 82,96,532 5,70,931 57,16,132 5.72 14
2035 618 1081 395 166 144 8,77,214 91,73,746 6,01,022 63,17,154 6.32 15
2036 650 1141 417 174 151 9,24,462 1,00,98,207 6,32,707 69,49,860 6.95 16
2037 684 1205 440 182 158 9,74,264 1,10,72,471 6,66,070 76,15,931 7.62 17
2038 719 1272 465 191 165 10,26,759 1,20,99,230 7,01,203 83,17,133 8.32 18
2039 757 1343 491 200 173 10,82,092 1,31,81,321 7,38,198 90,55,331 9.06 19
2040 796 1418 518 210 182 11,40,418 1,43,21,739 7,77,155 98,32,486 9.83 20
2041 837 1498 547 220 190 12,01,899 1,55,23,638 8,18,178 1,06,50,664 10.65 21
2042 881 1581 578 231 200 12,66,706 1,67,90,344 8,61,378 1,15,12,042 11.51 22
2043 927 1669 610 242 209 13,35,019 1,81,25,363 9,06,870 1,24,18,913 12.42 23
2044 975 1763 645 253 219 14,07,029 1,95,32,392 9,54,777 1,33,73,690 13.37 24
2045 1026 1861 681 265 230 14,82,937 2,10,15,329 10,05,228 1,43,78,918 14.38 25
2046 1079 1965 719 278 241 15,62,954 2,25,78,283 10,58,358 1,54,37,276 15.44 26
2047 1135 2075 759 292 252 16,47,302 2,42,25,585 11,14,309 1,65,51,585 16.55 27
2048 1194 2191 802 306 264 17,36,218 2,59,61,803 11,73,234 1,77,24,819 17.72 28
2049 1256 2313 846 320 277 18,29,948 2,77,91,751 12,35,290 1,89,60,108 18.96 29
2050 1322 2443 894 336 290 19,28,756 2,97,20,507 13,00,644 2,02,60,752 20.26 30
Annexure 6.5 : Improvement Proposal of Bridges and Underpass (NH-29)
Existing Details Proposal Details
Existing Span Existing Existing Proposed Span Proposed Proposed
Existing Existing Design Width of
No's of Arrang. (No. of Total Total Improvement Arrang (No. of Proposed Total Type of
Sl No Chainage Type of Remarks Chainage proposed Section Details
Span Span x Span Length Width Proposal Span x Span Category Length Superstructu
(km) Bridge (km) structure (m)
length in m) (m) (m) length in m) (m) re
1 67+700 Solid Slab 4 4x5.8 23.20 8.2 Widened New 2 lane Bridge 67+510 4x5.8 MNBR 23.20 2x13.5 RCC Box
Section-3
Solid Slab & km.65+923 to
2 69+300 3 1x5.8+1x23.7+1x5.8 35.30 8.3 Retained & Repair New 2 lane Bridge 69+205 1x35.3 MNBR 35.30 2x13.5 PSC I Girder
RCC T Girder km.80+930
Length-15.007km
3 73+000 Solid Slab 4 4x5.8 23.20 8.1 Widened New 2 lane Bridge 72+951 4x5.8 MNBR 23.20 2x13.5 RCC Box
Annexure 11.1 - Toll Rate
Location: Total Tollable 15.007
Length (Km):
Car/Jeep/
Year Inflation (5%) Minibus LCV Bus 2- Axle 3 - Axle 4-6 Axle >= 7 Axle
Van
1.00 0.39 0.63 0.63 1.32 2.07 2.07 2.07 2.52
01/Apr/2011 31/Mar/2012 2012 1.05 0.41 0.66 0.66 1.39 2.17 2.17 2.17 2.65
01/Apr/2012 31/Mar/2013 2013 1.10 0.43 0.69 0.69 1.46 2.28 2.28 2.28 2.78
01/Apr/2013 31/Mar/2014 2014 1.16 0.45 0.73 0.73 1.53 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.92
01/Apr/2014 31/Mar/2015 2015 1.22 0.47 0.77 0.77 1.60 2.52 2.52 2.52 3.06
01/Apr/2015 31/Mar/2016 2016 1.28 0.50 0.80 0.80 1.68 2.64 2.64 2.64 3.22
01/Apr/2016 31/Mar/2017 2017 1.34 0.52 0.84 0.84 1.77 2.77 2.77 2.77 3.38
01/Apr/2017 31/Mar/2018 2018 1.41 0.55 0.89 0.89 1.86 2.91 2.91 2.91 3.55
01/Apr/2018 31/Mar/2019 2019 1.48 0.58 0.93 0.93 1.95 3.06 3.06 3.06 3.72
01/Apr/2019 31/Mar/2020 2020 1.55 0.61 0.98 0.98 2.05 3.21 3.21 3.21 3.91
01/Apr/2020 31/Mar/2021 2021 1.63 0.64 1.03 1.03 2.15 3.37 3.37 3.37 4.10
01/Apr/2021 31/Mar/2022 2022 1.71 0.67 1.08 1.08 2.26 3.54 3.54 3.54 4.31
01/Apr/2022 31/Mar/2023 2023 1.80 0.70 1.13 1.13 2.37 3.72 3.72 3.72 4.53
01/Apr/2023 31/Mar/2024 2024 1.89 0.74 1.19 1.19 2.49 3.90 3.90 3.90 4.75
01/Apr/2024 31/Mar/2025 2025 1.98 0.77 1.25 1.25 2.61 4.10 4.10 4.10 4.99
01/Apr/2025 31/Mar/2026 2026 2.08 0.81 1.31 1.31 2.74 4.30 4.30 4.30 5.24
01/Apr/2026 31/Mar/2027 2027 2.18 0.85 1.38 1.38 2.88 4.52 4.52 4.52 5.50
01/Apr/2027 31/Mar/2028 2028 2.29 0.89 1.44 1.44 3.03 4.74 4.74 4.74 5.78
01/Apr/2028 31/Mar/2029 2029 2.41 0.94 1.52 1.52 3.18 4.98 4.98 4.98 6.06
01/Apr/2029 31/Mar/2030 2030 2.53 0.99 1.59 1.59 3.34 5.23 5.23 5.23 6.37
01/Apr/2030 31/Mar/2031 2031 2.65 1.03 1.67 1.67 3.50 5.49 5.49 5.49 6.69
01/Apr/2031 31/Mar/2032 2032 2.79 1.09 1.76 1.76 3.68 5.77 5.77 5.77 7.02
01/Apr/2032 31/Mar/2033 2033 2.93 1.14 1.84 1.84 3.86 6.06 6.06 6.06 7.37
01/Apr/2033 31/Mar/2034 2034 3.07 1.20 1.94 1.94 4.05 6.36 6.36 6.36 7.74
01/Apr/2034 31/Mar/2035 2035 3.23 1.26 2.03 2.03 4.26 6.68 6.68 6.68 8.13
01/Apr/2035 31/Mar/2036 2036 3.39 1.32 2.13 2.13 4.47 7.01 7.01 7.01 8.53
01/Apr/2036 31/Mar/2037 2037 3.56 1.39 2.24 2.24 4.69 7.36 7.36 7.36 8.96
01/Apr/2037 31/Mar/2038 2038 3.73 1.46 2.35 2.35 4.93 7.73 7.73 7.73 9.41
01/Apr/2038 31/Mar/2039 2039 3.92 1.53 2.47 2.47 5.17 8.11 8.11 8.11 9.88
01/Apr/2039 31/Mar/2040 2040 4.12 1.61 2.59 2.59 5.43 8.52 8.52 8.52 10.37
01/Apr/2040 31/Mar/2041 2041 4.32 1.69 2.72 2.72 5.70 8.95 8.95 8.95 10.89
01/Apr/2041 31/Mar/2042 2042 4.54 1.77 2.86 2.86 5.99 9.39 9.39 9.39 11.44
01/Apr/2042 31/Mar/2043 2043 4.76 1.86 3.00 3.00 6.29 9.86 9.86 9.86 12.01
01/Apr/2043 31/Mar/2044 2044 5.00 1.95 3.15 3.15 6.60 10.36 10.36 10.36 12.61
01/Apr/2044 31/Mar/2045 2045 5.25 2.05 3.31 3.31 6.93 10.87 10.87 10.87 13.24
01/Apr/2045 31/Mar/2046 2046 5.52 2.15 3.48 3.48 7.28 11.42 11.42 11.42 13.90
01/Apr/2046 31/Mar/2047 2047 5.79 2.26 3.65 3.65 7.65 11.99 11.99 11.99 14.60
01/Apr/2047 31/Mar/2048 2048 6.08 2.37 3.83 3.83 8.03 12.59 12.59 12.59 15.33
01/Apr/2048 31/Mar/2049 2049 6.39 2.49 4.02 4.02 8.43 13.22 13.22 13.22 16.09
01/Apr/2049 31/Mar/2050 2050 6.70 2.61 4.22 4.22 8.85 13.88 13.88 13.88 16.90
Annexure 11.2 - Base Traffic
Year Traffic Car/ Taxi/ Tata Minibus Std. Bus LCV 2-Axle 3-Axle 4-Axle 7 Axle Total Total
Increase Jeep/Van/ Magic / LMV and Above Tollable Traffic
LMV 6 Axle
2018 1,533 32 46 240 445 164 74 65 - 2,599 -
2019 1,651 35 49 258 477 176 79 70 - 2,795 -
2020 1,778 37 53 278 512 189 85 75 - 3,006 -
2021 1,913 40 57 299 549 202 91 80 - 3,230 -
2022 2,059 43 61 321 588 217 97 85 - 3,471 -
2023 2,215 47 66 346 630 232 103 91 - 3,730 -
2024 2,383 50 71 372 676 249 110 97 - 4,008 -
2025 2,564 54 76 399 724 267 118 104 - 4,307 -
2026 2,726 57 80 423 769 284 125 110 - 4,574 -
2027 2,898 61 85 447 817 301 132 116 - 4,857 -
2028 3,080 65 90 473 868 320 139 123 - 5,158 -
2029 3,274 69 95 500 921 340 148 130 - 5,478 -
2030 3,481 73 101 529 979 361 156 138 - 5,817 -
2031 3,672 77 106 557 1,033 381 164 144 - 6,135 -
2032 3,874 81 112 586 1,091 402 171 151 - 6,469 -
2033 4,087 86 117 616 1,152 425 180 159 - 6,822 -
2034 4,312 91 124 648 1,217 448 188 166 - 7,194 -
2035 4,549 96 130 682 1,285 474 197 174 - 7,587 -
2036 4,799 101 137 718 1,357 500 207 183 - 8,001 -
2037 5,063 106 144 755 1,433 528 217 191 - 8,438 -
2038 5,342 112 151 794 1,513 558 227 201 - 8,898 -
2039 5,635 119 159 836 1,598 589 238 210 - 9,384 -
2040 5,945 125 167 879 1,688 622 249 220 - 9,896 -
2041 6,272 132 176 925 1,782 657 261 231 - 10,436 -
2042 6,617 139 185 973 1,882 693 274 242 - 11,006 -
2043 6,981 147 195 1,023 1,987 732 287 253 - 11,607 -
2044 7,365 155 205 1,077 2,099 773 301 266 - 12,240 -
2045 7,770 163 216 1,133 2,216 817 315 278 - 12,909 -
2046 8,198 172 227 1,191 2,340 862 331 292 - 13,613 -
2047 8,649 182 239 1,253 2,471 911 346 306 - 14,357 -
2048 9,124 192 251 1,319 2,610 962 363 320 - 15,141 -
2049 9,626 202 264 1,387 2,756 1,015 380 336 - 15,967 -
2050 10,156 214 278 1,459 2,910 1,072 399 352 - 16,839 -
2051 10,714 225 292 1,535 3,073 1,132 418 369 - 17,759 -
Annexure 11.3 - Toll Revenue
01/Apr/2022 01/Apr/2023 01/Apr/2024 01/Apr/2025 01/Apr/2026 01/Apr/2027 01/Apr/2028 01/Apr/2029 01/Apr/2030 01/Apr/2031 01/Apr/2032 01/Apr/2033 01/Apr/2034 01/Apr/2035
31/Mar/2023 31/Mar/2024 31/Mar/2025 31/Mar/2026 31/Mar/2027 31/Mar/2028 31/Mar/2029 31/Mar/2030 31/Mar/2031 31/Mar/2032 31/Mar/2033 31/Mar/2034 31/Mar/2035 31/Mar/2036
Units
365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365
2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036
Toll Revenue
Car/Jeep/Van/ LMV INR Crore 0.67 0.72 0.78 0.83 1.33 1.42 1.51 1.61 1.71 1.80 1.91 2.57 2.72 2.88
Taxi/ TataMagic / LMV INR Crore 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.06
Minibus INR Crore 0.03 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.13
Std. Bus INR Crore 0.34 0.37 0.45 0.48 0.57 0.61 0.71 0.75 0.87 0.92 1.04 1.10 1.26 1.32
LCV INR Crore 0.33 0.47 0.50 0.53 0.56 0.60 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.19 1.26 1.33 1.41
2-Axle INR Crore 0.43 0.50 0.53 0.61 0.70 0.74 0.85 0.96 1.01 1.14 1.27 1.42 1.57 1.75
3-Axle INR Crore 0.20 0.23 0.24 0.28 0.32 0.34 0.38 0.43 0.45 0.51 0.56 0.62 0.68 0.75
4-Axle and6 Axle INR Crore 0.17 0.20 0.21 0.24 0.28 0.29 0.33 0.38 0.39 0.44 0.49 0.54 0.59 0.65
7 AxleAbove INR Crore - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Total Toll Revenue INR Crore 2.18 2.54 2.78 3.05 3.85 4.09 4.69 5.09 5.45 5.88 6.62 7.69 8.35 8.96
Adjusted Toll Revenue INR Crore 2.18 2.54 2.78 3.05 3.85 4.09 4.69 5.09 5.45 5.88 6.62 7.69 8.35 8.96
01/Apr/2036 01/Apr/2037 01/Apr/2038 01/Apr/2039 01/Apr/2040 01/Apr/2041 01/Apr/2042 01/Apr/2043 01/Apr/2044 01/Apr/2045 01/Apr/2046 01/Apr/2047 01/Apr/2048
31/Mar/2037 31/Mar/2038 31/Mar/2039 31/Mar/2040 31/Mar/2041 31/Mar/2042 31/Mar/2043 31/Mar/2044 31/Mar/2045 31/Mar/2046 31/Mar/2047 31/Mar/2048 31/Mar/2049
Units
365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365
2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049
Toll Revenue
Car/Jeep/Van/ LMV INR Crore 3.04 3.22 4.28 4.53 4.79 5.07 6.26 6.62 7.01 7.41 9.18 9.71 10.28
Taxi/ TataMagic / LMV INR Crore 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.19 0.20 0.21
Minibus INR Crore 0.17 0.18 0.18 0.22 0.23 0.28 0.29 0.31 0.35 0.37 0.43 0.46 0.52
Std. Bus INR Crore 1.49 1.69 1.89 1.98 2.23 2.47 2.75 3.04 3.37 3.70 4.08 4.47 4.91
LCV INR Crore 1.74 1.83 1.94 2.33 2.46 2.93 3.10 3.27 3.83 4.04 4.70 4.97 5.71
2-Axle INR Crore 1.93 2.14 2.35 2.69 2.95 3.23 3.65 3.99 4.48 4.87 5.45 6.07 6.75
3-Axle INR Crore 0.83 0.91 0.99 1.12 1.23 1.33 1.49 1.62 1.81 1.95 2.16 2.39 2.64
4-Axle and6 Axle INR Crore 0.72 0.79 0.86 0.97 1.06 1.15 1.29 1.40 1.57 1.69 1.87 2.07 2.29
7 AxleAbove INR Crore - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Total Toll Revenue INR Crore 9.98 10.82 12.58 13.95 15.05 16.57 18.97 20.38 22.56 24.19 28.07 30.34 33.30
Adjusted Toll Revenue INR Crore 9.98 10.82 12.58 13.95 15.05 16.57 18.97 20.38 22.56 24.19 28.07 30.34 33.30
Annexure 11.4 - Profit & Loss Statement
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
01/Apr/2022 01/Apr/2023 01/Apr/2024 01/Apr/2025 01/Apr/2026 01/Apr/2027 01/Apr/2028 01/Apr/2029 01/Apr/2030 01/Apr/2031 01/Apr/2032 01/Apr/2033 01/Apr/2034 01/Apr/2035
INR Crore 31/Mar/2023 31/Mar/2024 31/Mar/2025 31/Mar/2026 31/Mar/2027 31/Mar/2028 31/Mar/2029 31/Mar/2030 31/Mar/2031 31/Mar/2032 31/Mar/2033 31/Mar/2034 31/Mar/2035 31/Mar/2036
365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365
2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036
Revenue 2.18 2.54 2.78 3.05 3.85 4.09 4.69 5.09 5.45 5.88 6.62 7.69 8.35 8.96
Maintenance Cost 0.55 0.58 0.61 0.64 0.67 13.06 0.74 0.78 0.82 0.86 0.90 17.50 1.00 1.05
EBITDA 1.63 1.96 2.17 2.41 3.17 -8.97 3.95 4.31 4.64 5.02 5.72 -9.81 7.35 7.91
EBITDA Margin 74.6% 77.1% 78.0% 78.9% 82.5% -219.4% 84.2% 84.7% 85.0% 85.4% 86.4% -127.7% 88.1% 88.3%
Depreciation 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88
Interest 9.74 9.33 8.42 7.53 6.64 5.77 4.87 3.99 3.10 2.22 1.33 0.44 - -
PBT -13.00 -12.25 -11.13 -10.01 -8.35 -19.63 -5.80 -4.56 -3.35 -2.08 -0.50 -15.14 2.47 3.03
Tax - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PAT -13.00 -12.25 -11.13 -10.01 -8.35 -19.63 -5.80 -4.56 -3.35 -2.08 -0.50 -15.14 2.47 3.03
PAT Margin -596% -482% -400% -328% -217% -480% -124% -90% -61% -35% -8% -197% 30% 34%
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
01/Apr/2036 01/Apr/2037 01/Apr/2038 01/Apr/2039 01/Apr/2040 01/Apr/2041 01/Apr/2042 01/Apr/2043 01/Apr/2044 01/Apr/2045 01/Apr/2046 01/Apr/2047 01/Apr/2048
INR Crore 31/Mar/2037 31/Mar/2038 31/Mar/2039 31/Mar/2040 31/Mar/2041 31/Mar/2042 31/Mar/2043 31/Mar/2044 31/Mar/2045 31/Mar/2046 31/Mar/2047 31/Mar/2048 31/Mar/2049
365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365
2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049
Revenue 9.98 10.82 12.58 13.95 15.05 16.57 18.97 20.38 22.56 24.19 28.07 30.34 33.30
Maintenance Cost 1.10 1.15 1.21 23.45 1.33 1.40 1.47 1.54 1.62 31.42 1.79 1.88 1.97
EBITDA 8.88 9.66 11.37 -9.50 13.72 15.17 17.50 18.84 20.93 -7.24 26.29 28.46 31.33
EBITDA Margin 89.0% 89.3% 90.4% -68.1% 91.1% 91.5% 92.2% 92.4% 92.8% -29.9% 93.6% 93.8% 94.1%
Depreciation 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88
Interest - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PBT 4.00 4.78 6.48 -14.39 8.83 10.28 12.61 13.96 16.05 -12.12 21.40 23.58 26.45
Tax - - - - - - - - - - - - 5.64
PAT 4.00 4.78 6.48 -14.39 8.83 10.28 12.61 13.96 16.05 -12.12 21.40 23.58 20.81
PAT Margin 40% 44% 52% -103% 59% 62% 66% 68% 71% -50% 76% 78% 62%
Annexure 11.5 - Balance Sheet
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
01/Oct/2020 01/Apr/2021 01/Apr/2022 01/Apr/2023 01/Apr/2024 01/Apr/2025 01/Apr/2026 01/Apr/2027 01/Apr/2028 01/Apr/2029 01/Apr/2030 01/Apr/2031 01/Apr/2032 01/Apr/2033 01/Apr/2034
INR Crore 31/Mar/2021 31/Mar/2022 31/Mar/2023 31/Mar/2024 31/Mar/2025 31/Mar/2026 31/Mar/2027 31/Mar/2028 31/Mar/2029 31/Mar/2030 31/Mar/2031 31/Mar/2032 31/Mar/2033 31/Mar/2034 31/Mar/2035
182 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035
Share Capital 11.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76
Reserves - - -13.00 -25.25 -36.37 -46.38 -54.73 -74.36 -80.16 -84.72 -88.07 -90.16 -90.65 -105.79 -103.33
Shareholder's Fund 11.76 41.76 28.76 16.51 5.38 -4.62 -12.98 -32.60 -38.41 -42.97 -46.32 -48.40 -48.90 -64.04 -61.57
Loan Fund 27.44 97.43 97.43 88.57 79.71 70.86 62.00 53.14 44.29 35.43 26.57 17.71 8.86 -0.00 -0.00
Source of Fund 39.21 139.18 126.19 105.08 85.10 66.23 49.02 20.54 5.88 -7.54 -19.75 -30.69 -40.04 -64.04 -61.57
Gross Block 39.21 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18
Accumulated Depreciation - - 4.88 9.77 14.65 19.53 24.42 29.30 34.19 39.07 43.95 48.84 53.72 58.60 63.49
Net Block 39.21 139.18 134.30 129.42 124.53 119.65 114.77 109.88 105.00 100.11 95.23 90.35 85.46 80.58 75.70
Cash & Bank - - -8.11 -24.34 -39.44 -53.42 -65.74 -89.34 -99.12 -107.65 -114.98 -121.03 -125.50 -144.62 -137.27
Application of Fund 39.21 139.18 126.19 105.08 85.10 66.23 49.02 20.54 5.88 -7.54 -19.75 -30.69 -40.04 -64.04 -61.57
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
01/Apr/2035 01/Apr/2036 01/Apr/2037 01/Apr/2038 01/Apr/2039 01/Apr/2040 01/Apr/2041 01/Apr/2042 01/Apr/2043 01/Apr/2044 01/Apr/2045 01/Apr/2046 01/Apr/2047 01/Apr/2048 01/Apr/2049
INR Crore 31/Mar/2036 31/Mar/2037 31/Mar/2038 31/Mar/2039 31/Mar/2040 31/Mar/2041 31/Mar/2042 31/Mar/2043 31/Mar/2044 31/Mar/2045 31/Mar/2046 31/Mar/2047 31/Mar/2048 31/Mar/2049 31/Mar/2050
365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365
2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050
Share Capital 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76
Reserves -100.30 -96.30 -91.52 -85.03 -99.42 -90.59 -80.30 -67.69 -53.73 -37.68 -49.80 -28.40 -4.82 15.99 38.24
Shareholder's Fund -58.54 -54.54 -49.76 -43.28 -57.66 -48.83 -38.55 -25.94 -11.98 4.07 -8.05 13.35 36.94 57.75 79.99
Loan Fund -0.00 -0.00 -0.00 -0.00 -0.00 -0.00 -0.00 -0.00 -0.00 -0.00 -0.00 -0.00 -0.00 -0.00 -0.00
Source of Fund -58.54 -54.54 -49.76 -43.28 -57.66 -48.83 -38.55 -25.94 -11.98 4.07 -8.05 13.35 36.94 57.75 79.99
Gross Block 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18
Accumulated Depreciation 68.37 73.25 78.14 83.02 87.91 92.79 97.67 102.56 107.44 112.32 117.21 122.09 126.97 131.86 136.74
Net Block 70.81 65.93 61.05 56.16 51.28 46.39 41.51 36.63 31.74 26.86 21.98 17.09 12.21 7.33 2.44
Cash & Bank -129.35 -120.47 -110.81 -99.44 -108.94 -95.22 -80.06 -62.56 -43.72 -22.79 -30.02 -3.74 24.73 50.42 77.55
Application of Fund -58.54 -54.54 -49.76 -43.28 -57.66 -48.83 -38.55 -25.94 -11.98 4.07 -8.05 13.35 36.94 57.75 79.99
Annexure 11.6 - Cash Flow Statement
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
01/Oct/2020 01/Apr/2021 01/Apr/2022 01/Apr/2023 01/Apr/2024 01/Apr/2025 01/Apr/2026 01/Apr/2027 01/Apr/2028 01/Apr/2029 01/Apr/2030 01/Apr/2031 01/Apr/2032 01/Apr/2033 01/Apr/2034
INR Crore 31/Mar/2021 31/Mar/2022 31/Mar/2023 31/Mar/2024 31/Mar/2025 31/Mar/2026 31/Mar/2027 31/Mar/2028 31/Mar/2029 31/Mar/2030 31/Mar/2031 31/Mar/2032 31/Mar/2033 31/Mar/2034 31/Mar/2035
182 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035
PAT - - -13.00 -12.25 -11.13 -10.01 -8.35 -19.63 -5.80 -4.56 -3.35 -2.08 -0.50 -15.14 2.47
Depreciation - - 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88
Interest - - 9.74 9.33 8.42 7.53 6.64 5.77 4.87 3.99 3.10 2.22 1.33 0.44 -
Change in Working Capital
Cash Flow from Operating Activities - - 1.63 1.96 2.17 2.41 3.17 -8.97 3.95 4.31 4.64 5.02 5.72 -9.81 7.35
Net Cash Flow - - -8.11 -16.22 -15.10 -13.98 -12.33 -23.60 -9.78 -8.53 -7.32 -6.06 -4.47 -19.11 7.35
Opening Cash Balance - - -8.11 -24.34 -39.44 -53.42 -65.74 -89.34 -99.12 -107.65 -114.98 -121.03 -125.50 -144.62
Closing Cash Balance - - -8.11 -24.34 -39.44 -53.42 -65.74 -89.34 -99.12 -107.65 -114.98 -121.03 -125.50 -144.62 -137.27
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
01/Apr/2035 01/Apr/2036 01/Apr/2037 01/Apr/2038 01/Apr/2039 01/Apr/2040 01/Apr/2041 01/Apr/2042 01/Apr/2043 01/Apr/2044 01/Apr/2045 01/Apr/2046 01/Apr/2047 01/Apr/2048 01/Apr/2049
INR Crore 31/Mar/2036 31/Mar/2037 31/Mar/2038 31/Mar/2039 31/Mar/2040 31/Mar/2041 31/Mar/2042 31/Mar/2043 31/Mar/2044 31/Mar/2045 31/Mar/2046 31/Mar/2047 31/Mar/2048 31/Mar/2049 31/Mar/2050
365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365
2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050
PAT 3.03 4.00 4.78 6.48 -14.39 8.83 10.28 12.61 13.96 16.05 -12.12 21.40 23.58 20.81 22.25
Depreciation 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88
Interest - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Change in Working Capital
Cash Flow from Operating Activities 7.91 8.88 9.66 11.37 -9.50 13.72 15.17 17.50 18.84 20.93 -7.24 26.29 28.46 25.69 27.13
Capex - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Cash Flow from Investing Activities - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Equity - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Term Loan Raised - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Term Loan Repayed - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grant - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Interest Paid - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Cash Flow from Financing Activities - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Net Cash Flow 7.91 8.88 9.66 11.37 -9.50 13.72 15.17 17.50 18.84 20.93 -7.24 26.29 28.46 25.69 27.13
Opening Cash Balance -137.27 -129.35 -120.47 -110.81 -99.44 -108.94 -95.22 -80.06 -62.56 -43.72 -22.79 -30.02 -3.74 24.73 50.42
Closing Cash Balance -129.35 -120.47 -110.81 -99.44 -108.94 -95.22 -80.06 -62.56 -43.72 -22.79 -30.02 -3.74 24.73 50.42 77.55
Annexure 11.7 - Financial Analysis
01/Oct/2020 01/Apr/2021 01/Apr/2022 01/Apr/2023 01/Apr/2024 01/Apr/2025 01/Apr/2026 01/Apr/2027 01/Apr/2028 01/Apr/2029 01/Apr/2030 01/Apr/2031 01/Apr/2032 01/Apr/2033 01/Apr/2034
31/Mar/2021 31/Mar/2022 31/Mar/2023 31/Mar/2024 31/Mar/2025 31/Mar/2026 31/Mar/2027 31/Mar/2028 31/Mar/2029 31/Mar/2030 31/Mar/2031 31/Mar/2032 31/Mar/2033 31/Mar/2034 31/Mar/2035
INR Crore
182 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035
Project Cash Flow -39.21 -99.98 1.63 1.96 2.17 2.41 3.17 -8.97 3.95 4.31 4.64 5.02 5.72 -9.81 7.35
Equity Cash Flow -11.76 -29.99 -8.11 -16.22 -15.10 -13.98 -12.33 -23.60 -9.78 -8.53 -7.32 -6.06 -4.47 -19.11 7.35
DSCR - - 0.17 0.11 0.13 0.15 0.20 -0.61 0.29 0.34 0.39 0.45 0.56 -1.05 -
01/Apr/2035 01/Apr/2036 01/Apr/2037 01/Apr/2038 01/Apr/2039 01/Apr/2040 01/Apr/2041 01/Apr/2042 01/Apr/2043 01/Apr/2044 01/Apr/2045 01/Apr/2046 01/Apr/2047 01/Apr/2048 01/Apr/2049
31/Mar/2036 31/Mar/2037 31/Mar/2038 31/Mar/2039 31/Mar/2040 31/Mar/2041 31/Mar/2042 31/Mar/2043 31/Mar/2044 31/Mar/2045 31/Mar/2046 31/Mar/2047 31/Mar/2048 31/Mar/2049 31/Mar/2050
INR Crore
365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365
2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050
Project Cash Flow 7.91 8.88 9.66 11.37 -9.50 13.72 15.17 17.50 18.84 20.93 -7.24 26.29 28.46 25.69 27.13
Equity Cash Flow 7.91 8.88 9.66 11.37 -9.50 13.72 15.17 17.50 18.84 20.93 -7.24 26.29 28.46 25.69 27.13
DSCR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Revenue 22.45 22.45 22.45 22.45 22.45 22.45 22.45 22.45 22.45 22.45 22.45 22.45 22.45 22.45
Maintenance Cost 0.55 0.58 0.61 0.64 0.67 13.06 0.74 0.78 0.82 0.86 0.90 17.50 1.00 1.05
EBITDA 21.90 21.87 21.84 21.81 21.78 9.39 21.71 21.67 21.63 21.59 21.55 4.95 21.45 21.40
EBITDA Margin 97.5% 97.4% 97.3% 97.1% 97.0% 41.8% 96.7% 96.5% 96.4% 96.2% 96.0% 22.1% 95.6% 95.3%
Depreciation 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88
Interest 9.74 9.33 8.42 7.53 6.64 5.77 4.87 3.99 3.10 2.22 1.33 0.44 - -
PBT 7.27 7.66 8.54 9.39 10.25 -1.26 11.95 12.80 13.65 14.49 15.33 -0.38 16.57 16.52
Tax - - 0.10 1.04 1.51 - 2.38 2.78 3.16 3.52 3.87 0.04 4.41 4.50
PAT 7.27 7.66 8.44 8.35 8.74 -1.26 9.58 10.02 10.49 10.97 11.47 -0.41 12.16 12.02
PAT Margin 32% 34% 38% 37% 39% -6% 43% 45% 47% 49% 51% -2% 54% 54%
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
01/Apr/2036 01/Apr/2037 01/Apr/2038 01/Apr/2039 01/Apr/2040 01/Apr/2041 01/Apr/2042 01/Apr/2043 01/Apr/2044 01/Apr/2045 01/Apr/2046 01/Apr/2047 01/Apr/2048
INR Crore 31/Mar/2037 31/Mar/2038 31/Mar/2039 31/Mar/2040 31/Mar/2041 31/Mar/2042 31/Mar/2043 31/Mar/2044 31/Mar/2045 31/Mar/2046 31/Mar/2047 31/Mar/2048 31/Mar/2049
365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365
2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049
Revenue 22.45 22.45 22.45 22.45 22.45 22.45 22.45 22.45 22.45 22.45 22.45 22.45 22.45
Maintenance Cost 1.10 1.15 1.21 23.45 1.33 1.40 1.47 1.54 1.62 31.42 1.79 1.88 1.97
EBITDA 21.35 21.30 21.24 -1.00 21.12 21.05 20.98 20.91 20.83 -8.97 20.66 20.57 20.48
EBITDA Margin 95.1% 94.9% 94.6% -4.5% 94.1% 93.8% 93.4% 93.1% 92.8% -40.0% 92.0% 91.6% 91.2%
Depreciation 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88
Interest - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PBT 16.47 16.41 16.36 -5.88 16.23 16.17 16.10 16.02 15.94 -13.86 15.78 15.69 15.60
Tax 4.57 4.64 4.70 - 4.79 4.82 4.85 4.88 4.90 - 4.92 4.93 4.93
PAT 11.90 11.77 11.66 -5.88 11.44 11.34 11.24 11.14 11.05 -13.86 10.86 10.76 10.67
PAT Margin 53% 52% 52% -26% 51% 51% 50% 50% 49% -62% 48% 48% 48%
Annexure 11.9 - Balance Sheet
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
01/Oct/2020 01/Apr/2021 01/Apr/2022 01/Apr/2023 01/Apr/2024 01/Apr/2025 01/Apr/2026 01/Apr/2027 01/Apr/2028 01/Apr/2029 01/Apr/2030 01/Apr/2031 01/Apr/2032 01/Apr/2033 01/Apr/2034
INR Crore 31/Mar/2021 31/Mar/2022 31/Mar/2023 31/Mar/2024 31/Mar/2025 31/Mar/2026 31/Mar/2027 31/Mar/2028 31/Mar/2029 31/Mar/2030 31/Mar/2031 31/Mar/2032 31/Mar/2033 31/Mar/2034 31/Mar/2035
182 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035
Share Capital 11.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76
Reserves - - 7.27 14.93 23.37 31.72 40.46 39.20 48.77 58.80 69.29 80.25 91.72 91.31 103.47
Shareholder's Fund 11.76 41.76 49.02 56.68 65.12 73.48 82.22 80.95 90.53 100.55 111.04 122.01 133.48 133.07 145.23
Loan Fund 27.44 97.43 97.43 88.57 79.71 70.86 62.00 53.14 44.29 35.43 26.57 17.71 8.86 -0.00 -0.00
Source of Fund 39.21 139.18 146.45 145.25 144.84 144.33 144.22 134.09 134.81 135.98 137.61 139.72 142.33 133.07 145.23
Gross Block 39.21 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18
Accumulated Depreciation - - 4.88 9.77 14.65 19.53 24.42 29.30 34.19 39.07 43.95 48.84 53.72 58.60 63.49
Net Block 39.21 139.18 134.30 129.42 124.53 119.65 114.77 109.88 105.00 100.11 95.23 90.35 85.46 80.58 75.70
Cash & Bank - - 12.15 15.84 20.30 24.68 29.45 24.21 29.81 35.86 42.38 49.38 56.87 52.48 69.53
Application of Fund 39.21 139.18 146.45 145.25 144.84 144.33 144.22 134.09 134.81 135.98 137.61 139.72 142.33 133.07 145.23
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
01/Apr/2035 01/Apr/2036 01/Apr/2037 01/Apr/2038 01/Apr/2039 01/Apr/2040 01/Apr/2041 01/Apr/2042 01/Apr/2043 01/Apr/2044 01/Apr/2045 01/Apr/2046 01/Apr/2047 01/Apr/2048 01/Apr/2049
INR Crore 31/Mar/2036 31/Mar/2037 31/Mar/2038 31/Mar/2039 31/Mar/2040 31/Mar/2041 31/Mar/2042 31/Mar/2043 31/Mar/2044 31/Mar/2045 31/Mar/2046 31/Mar/2047 31/Mar/2048 31/Mar/2049 31/Mar/2050
365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365
2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050
Share Capital 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76 41.76
Reserves 115.49 127.39 139.17 150.83 144.94 156.39 167.73 178.97 190.11 201.16 187.30 198.16 208.92 219.59 230.16
Shareholder's Fund 157.25 169.15 180.92 192.58 186.70 198.14 209.48 220.72 231.87 242.91 229.06 239.91 250.68 261.34 271.91
Loan Fund -0.00 -0.00 -0.00 -0.00 -0.00 -0.00 -0.00 -0.00 -0.00 -0.00 -0.00 -0.00 -0.00 -0.00 -0.00
Source of Fund 157.25 169.15 180.92 192.58 186.70 198.14 209.48 220.72 231.87 242.91 229.06 239.91 250.68 261.34 271.91
Gross Block 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18 139.18
Accumulated Depreciation 68.37 73.25 78.14 83.02 87.91 92.79 97.67 102.56 107.44 112.32 117.21 122.09 126.97 131.86 136.74
Net Block 70.81 65.93 61.05 56.16 51.28 46.39 41.51 36.63 31.74 26.86 21.98 17.09 12.21 7.33 2.44
Cash & Bank 86.44 103.22 119.88 136.42 135.42 151.75 167.97 184.10 200.12 216.05 207.08 222.82 238.47 254.02 269.47
Application of Fund 157.25 169.15 180.92 192.58 186.70 198.14 209.48 220.72 231.87 242.91 229.06 239.91 250.68 261.34 271.91
Annexure 11.10 - Cash Flow Statement
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
01/Oct/2020 01/Apr/2021 01/Apr/2022 01/Apr/2023 01/Apr/2024 01/Apr/2025 01/Apr/2026 01/Apr/2027 01/Apr/2028 01/Apr/2029 01/Apr/2030 01/Apr/2031 01/Apr/2032 01/Apr/2033 01/Apr/2034
INR Crore 31/Mar/2021 31/Mar/2022 31/Mar/2023 31/Mar/2024 31/Mar/2025 31/Mar/2026 31/Mar/2027 31/Mar/2028 31/Mar/2029 31/Mar/2030 31/Mar/2031 31/Mar/2032 31/Mar/2033 31/Mar/2034 31/Mar/2035
182 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035
PAT - - 7.27 7.66 8.44 8.35 8.74 -1.26 9.58 10.02 10.49 10.97 11.47 -0.41 12.16
Depreciation - - 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88
Interest - - 9.74 9.33 8.42 7.53 6.64 5.77 4.87 3.99 3.10 2.22 1.33 0.44 -
Change in Working Capital
Cash Flow from Operating Activities - - 21.90 21.87 21.74 20.77 20.27 9.39 19.33 18.89 18.48 18.07 17.68 4.92 17.04
Net Cash Flow - - 12.15 3.69 4.47 4.38 4.76 -5.24 5.60 6.05 6.52 6.99 7.49 -4.38 17.04
Opening Cash Balance - - 12.15 15.84 20.30 24.68 29.45 24.21 29.81 35.86 42.38 49.38 56.87 52.48
Closing Cash Balance - - 12.15 15.84 20.30 24.68 29.45 24.21 29.81 35.86 42.38 49.38 56.87 52.48 69.53
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
01/Apr/2035 01/Apr/2036 01/Apr/2037 01/Apr/2038 01/Apr/2039 01/Apr/2040 01/Apr/2041 01/Apr/2042 01/Apr/2043 01/Apr/2044 01/Apr/2045 01/Apr/2046 01/Apr/2047 01/Apr/2048 01/Apr/2049
INR Crore 31/Mar/2036 31/Mar/2037 31/Mar/2038 31/Mar/2039 31/Mar/2040 31/Mar/2041 31/Mar/2042 31/Mar/2043 31/Mar/2044 31/Mar/2045 31/Mar/2046 31/Mar/2047 31/Mar/2048 31/Mar/2049 31/Mar/2050
365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365
2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050
PAT 12.02 11.90 11.77 11.66 -5.88 11.44 11.34 11.24 11.14 11.05 -13.86 10.86 10.76 10.67 10.57
Depreciation 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88
Interest - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Change in Working Capital
Cash Flow from Operating Activities 16.91 16.78 16.66 16.54 -1.00 16.33 16.22 16.12 16.03 15.93 -8.97 15.74 15.65 15.55 15.45
Capex - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Cash Flow from Investing Activities - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Equity - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Term Loan Raised - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Term Loan Repayed - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grant - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Interest Paid - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Cash Flow from Financing Activities - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Net Cash Flow 16.91 16.78 16.66 16.54 -1.00 16.33 16.22 16.12 16.03 15.93 -8.97 15.74 15.65 15.55 15.45
Opening Cash Balance 69.53 86.44 103.22 119.88 136.42 135.42 151.75 167.97 184.10 200.12 216.05 207.08 222.82 238.47 254.02
Closing Cash Balance 86.44 103.22 119.88 136.42 135.42 151.75 167.97 184.10 200.12 216.05 207.08 222.82 238.47 254.02 269.47
Annexure 11.11 - Financial Analysis
01/Oct/2020 01/Apr/2021 01/Apr/2022 01/Apr/2023 01/Apr/2024 01/Apr/2025 01/Apr/2026 01/Apr/2027 01/Apr/2028 01/Apr/2029 01/Apr/2030 01/Apr/2031 01/Apr/2032 01/Apr/2033 01/Apr/2034
31/Mar/2021 31/Mar/2022 31/Mar/2023 31/Mar/2024 31/Mar/2025 31/Mar/2026 31/Mar/2027 31/Mar/2028 31/Mar/2029 31/Mar/2030 31/Mar/2031 31/Mar/2032 31/Mar/2033 31/Mar/2034 31/Mar/2035
INR Crore
182 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035
Project Cash Flow -39.21 -99.98 21.90 21.87 21.74 20.77 20.27 9.39 19.33 18.89 18.48 18.07 17.68 4.92 17.04
Equity Cash Flow -11.76 -29.99 12.15 3.69 4.47 4.38 4.76 -5.24 5.60 6.05 6.52 6.99 7.49 -4.38 17.04
DSCR - - 2.25 1.20 1.26 1.27 1.31 0.64 1.41 1.47 1.54 1.63 1.74 0.53 -
01/Apr/2035 01/Apr/2036 01/Apr/2037 01/Apr/2038 01/Apr/2039 01/Apr/2040 01/Apr/2041 01/Apr/2042 01/Apr/2043 01/Apr/2044 01/Apr/2045 01/Apr/2046 01/Apr/2047 01/Apr/2048 01/Apr/2049
31/Mar/2036 31/Mar/2037 31/Mar/2038 31/Mar/2039 31/Mar/2040 31/Mar/2041 31/Mar/2042 31/Mar/2043 31/Mar/2044 31/Mar/2045 31/Mar/2046 31/Mar/2047 31/Mar/2048 31/Mar/2049 31/Mar/2050
INR Crore
365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365
2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050
Project Cash Flow 16.91 16.78 16.66 16.54 -1.00 16.33 16.22 16.12 16.03 15.93 -8.97 15.74 15.65 15.55 15.45
Equity Cash Flow 16.91 16.78 16.66 16.54 -1.00 16.33 16.22 16.12 16.03 15.93 -8.97 15.74 15.65 15.55 15.45
DSCR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Revenue 35.60 35.60 35.60 35.60 35.60 35.60 35.60 35.60 35.60 35.60 35.60 35.60 35.60 35.60
Maintenance Cost 0.55 0.58 0.61 0.64 0.67 13.06 0.74 0.78 0.82 0.86 0.90 17.50 1.00 1.05
EBITDA 35.05 35.02 34.99 34.96 34.93 22.54 34.86 34.82 34.78 34.74 34.70 18.10 34.60 34.55
EBITDA Margin 98.4% 98.4% 98.3% 98.2% 98.1% 63.3% 97.9% 97.8% 97.7% 97.6% 97.5% 50.8% 97.2% 97.1%
Depreciation 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14
Interest 16.24 15.54 14.03 12.55 11.07 9.62 8.12 6.64 5.17 3.70 2.22 0.74 - -
PBT 10.67 11.34 12.82 14.27 15.71 4.78 18.60 20.04 21.47 22.90 24.34 9.22 26.46 26.42
Tax - - - 0.47 2.17 - 3.63 4.30 4.94 5.55 6.14 2.54 7.06 7.21
PAT 10.67 11.34 12.82 13.80 13.54 4.78 14.97 15.74 16.53 17.35 18.20 6.68 19.40 19.20
PAT Margin 30% 32% 36% 39% 38% 13% 42% 44% 46% 49% 51% 19% 55% 54%
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
01/Apr/2036 01/Apr/2037 01/Apr/2038 01/Apr/2039 01/Apr/2040 01/Apr/2041 01/Apr/2042 01/Apr/2043 01/Apr/2044 01/Apr/2045 01/Apr/2046 01/Apr/2047 01/Apr/2048
INR Crore 31/Mar/2037 31/Mar/2038 31/Mar/2039 31/Mar/2040 31/Mar/2041 31/Mar/2042 31/Mar/2043 31/Mar/2044 31/Mar/2045 31/Mar/2046 31/Mar/2047 31/Mar/2048 31/Mar/2049
365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365
2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049
Revenue 35.60 35.60 35.60 35.60 35.60 35.60 35.60 35.60 35.60 35.60 35.60 35.60 35.60
Maintenance Cost 1.10 1.15 1.21 23.45 1.33 1.40 1.47 1.54 1.62 31.42 1.79 1.88 1.97
EBITDA 34.50 34.45 34.39 12.15 34.27 34.20 34.13 34.06 33.98 4.18 33.81 33.72 33.63
EBITDA Margin 96.9% 96.8% 96.6% 34.1% 96.3% 96.1% 95.9% 95.7% 95.4% 11.7% 95.0% 94.7% 94.5%
Depreciation 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14
Interest - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PBT 26.36 26.31 26.25 4.01 26.13 26.06 25.99 25.92 25.84 -3.96 25.67 25.58 25.49
Tax 7.35 7.47 7.57 2.08 7.75 7.82 7.88 7.93 7.98 0.53 8.04 8.07 8.09
PAT 19.01 18.84 18.68 1.93 18.38 18.24 18.11 17.98 17.86 -4.50 17.63 17.52 17.40
PAT Margin 53% 53% 52% 5% 52% 51% 51% 51% 50% -13% 50% 49% 49%
Annexure 11.13 - Balance Sheet
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
01/Oct/2020 01/Apr/2021 01/Apr/2022 01/Apr/2023 01/Apr/2024 01/Apr/2025 01/Apr/2026 01/Apr/2027 01/Apr/2028 01/Apr/2029 01/Apr/2030 01/Apr/2031 01/Apr/2032 01/Apr/2033 01/Apr/2034
INR Crore 31/Mar/2021 31/Mar/2022 31/Mar/2023 31/Mar/2024 31/Mar/2025 31/Mar/2026 31/Mar/2027 31/Mar/2028 31/Mar/2029 31/Mar/2030 31/Mar/2031 31/Mar/2032 31/Mar/2033 31/Mar/2034 31/Mar/2035
182 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035
Share Capital 19.60 69.59 69.59 69.59 69.59 69.59 69.59 69.59 69.59 69.59 69.59 69.59 69.59 69.59 69.59
Reserves - - 10.67 22.00 34.83 48.62 62.16 66.95 81.92 97.65 114.19 131.54 149.74 156.42 175.83
Shareholder's Fund 19.60 69.59 80.26 91.60 104.42 118.22 131.76 136.54 151.51 167.25 183.78 201.13 219.33 226.02 245.42
Loan Fund 45.74 162.38 162.38 147.62 132.86 118.10 103.33 88.57 73.81 59.05 44.29 29.52 14.76 0.00 0.00
Source of Fund 65.34 231.97 242.64 239.21 237.28 236.31 235.09 225.11 225.32 226.29 228.06 230.65 234.09 226.02 245.42
Gross Block 65.34 231.97 231.97 231.97 231.97 231.97 231.97 231.97 231.97 231.97 231.97 231.97 231.97 231.97 231.97
Accumulated Depreciation - - 8.14 16.28 24.42 32.56 40.70 48.84 56.98 65.12 73.25 81.39 89.53 97.67 105.81
Net Block 65.34 231.97 223.83 215.69 207.55 199.42 191.28 183.14 175.00 166.86 158.72 150.58 142.44 134.30 126.16
Cash & Bank - - 18.81 23.52 29.72 36.90 43.81 41.97 50.32 59.44 69.35 80.07 91.65 91.72 119.26
Application of Fund 65.34 231.97 242.64 239.21 237.28 236.31 235.09 225.11 225.32 226.29 228.06 230.65 234.09 226.02 245.42
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
01/Apr/2035 01/Apr/2036 01/Apr/2037 01/Apr/2038 01/Apr/2039 01/Apr/2040 01/Apr/2041 01/Apr/2042 01/Apr/2043 01/Apr/2044 01/Apr/2045 01/Apr/2046 01/Apr/2047 01/Apr/2048 01/Apr/2049
INR Crore 31/Mar/2036 31/Mar/2037 31/Mar/2038 31/Mar/2039 31/Mar/2040 31/Mar/2041 31/Mar/2042 31/Mar/2043 31/Mar/2044 31/Mar/2045 31/Mar/2046 31/Mar/2047 31/Mar/2048 31/Mar/2049 31/Mar/2050
365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365
2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050
Share Capital 69.59 69.59 69.59 69.59 69.59 69.59 69.59 69.59 69.59 69.59 69.59 69.59 69.59 69.59 69.59
Reserves 195.03 214.05 232.89 251.56 253.49 271.87 290.11 308.22 326.20 344.07 339.57 357.20 374.71 392.11 409.41
Shareholder's Fund 264.62 283.64 302.48 321.15 323.08 341.46 359.70 377.81 395.79 413.66 409.16 426.79 444.30 461.71 479.00
Loan Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Source of Fund 264.62 283.64 302.48 321.15 323.08 341.46 359.70 377.81 395.79 413.66 409.16 426.79 444.30 461.71 479.00
Gross Block 231.97 231.97 231.97 231.97 231.97 231.97 231.97 231.97 231.97 231.97 231.97 231.97 231.97 231.97 231.97
Accumulated Depreciation 113.95 122.09 130.23 138.37 146.51 154.65 162.79 170.93 179.07 187.21 195.35 203.48 211.62 219.76 227.90
Net Block 118.02 109.88 101.74 93.60 85.46 77.32 69.18 61.05 52.91 44.77 36.63 28.49 20.35 12.21 4.07
Cash & Bank 146.60 173.76 200.74 227.55 237.62 264.14 290.52 316.77 342.89 368.89 372.53 398.30 423.95 449.50 474.93
Application of Fund 264.62 283.64 302.48 321.15 323.08 341.46 359.70 377.81 395.79 413.66 409.16 426.79 444.30 461.71 479.00
Annexure 11.14 - Cash Flow Statement
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
01/Oct/2020 01/Apr/2021 01/Apr/2022 01/Apr/2023 01/Apr/2024 01/Apr/2025 01/Apr/2026 01/Apr/2027 01/Apr/2028 01/Apr/2029 01/Apr/2030 01/Apr/2031 01/Apr/2032 01/Apr/2033 01/Apr/2034
INR Crore 31/Mar/2021 31/Mar/2022 31/Mar/2023 31/Mar/2024 31/Mar/2025 31/Mar/2026 31/Mar/2027 31/Mar/2028 31/Mar/2029 31/Mar/2030 31/Mar/2031 31/Mar/2032 31/Mar/2033 31/Mar/2034 31/Mar/2035
182 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035
PAT - - 10.67 11.34 12.82 13.80 13.54 4.78 14.97 15.74 16.53 17.35 18.20 6.68 19.40
Depreciation - - 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14
Interest - - 16.24 15.54 14.03 12.55 11.07 9.62 8.12 6.64 5.17 3.70 2.22 0.74 -
Change in Working Capital
Cash Flow from Operating Activities - - 35.05 35.02 34.99 34.49 32.75 22.54 31.23 30.52 29.84 29.19 28.56 15.56 27.54
Net Cash Flow - - 18.81 4.71 6.20 7.17 6.92 -1.84 8.35 9.11 9.91 10.73 11.58 0.06 27.54
Opening Cash Balance - - 18.81 23.52 29.72 36.90 43.81 41.97 50.32 59.44 69.35 80.07 91.65 91.72
Closing Cash Balance - - 18.81 23.52 29.72 36.90 43.81 41.97 50.32 59.44 69.35 80.07 91.65 91.72 119.26
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
01/Apr/2035 01/Apr/2036 01/Apr/2037 01/Apr/2038 01/Apr/2039 01/Apr/2040 01/Apr/2041 01/Apr/2042 01/Apr/2043 01/Apr/2044 01/Apr/2045 01/Apr/2046 01/Apr/2047 01/Apr/2048 01/Apr/2049
INR Crore 31/Mar/2036 31/Mar/2037 31/Mar/2038 31/Mar/2039 31/Mar/2040 31/Mar/2041 31/Mar/2042 31/Mar/2043 31/Mar/2044 31/Mar/2045 31/Mar/2046 31/Mar/2047 31/Mar/2048 31/Mar/2049 31/Mar/2050
365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365
2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050
PAT 19.20 19.01 18.84 18.68 1.93 18.38 18.24 18.11 17.98 17.86 -4.50 17.63 17.52 17.40 17.29
Depreciation 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.14
Interest - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Change in Working Capital
Cash Flow from Operating Activities 27.34 27.15 26.98 26.82 10.07 26.52 26.38 26.25 26.12 26.00 3.64 25.77 25.65 25.54 25.43
Capex - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Cash Flow from Investing Activities - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Equity - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Term Loan Raised - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Term Loan Repayed - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Grant - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Interest Paid - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Cash Flow from Financing Activities - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Net Cash Flow 27.34 27.15 26.98 26.82 10.07 26.52 26.38 26.25 26.12 26.00 3.64 25.77 25.65 25.54 25.43
Opening Cash Balance 119.26 146.60 173.76 200.74 227.55 237.62 264.14 290.52 316.77 342.89 368.89 372.53 398.30 423.95 449.50
Closing Cash Balance 146.60 173.76 200.74 227.55 237.62 264.14 290.52 316.77 342.89 368.89 372.53 398.30 423.95 449.50 474.93
Annexure 11.15 - Financial Analysis
01/Oct/2020 01/Apr/2021 01/Apr/2022 01/Apr/2023 01/Apr/2024 01/Apr/2025 01/Apr/2026 01/Apr/2027 01/Apr/2028 01/Apr/2029 01/Apr/2030 01/Apr/2031 01/Apr/2032 01/Apr/2033 01/Apr/2034
31/Mar/2021 31/Mar/2022 31/Mar/2023 31/Mar/2024 31/Mar/2025 31/Mar/2026 31/Mar/2027 31/Mar/2028 31/Mar/2029 31/Mar/2030 31/Mar/2031 31/Mar/2032 31/Mar/2033 31/Mar/2034 31/Mar/2035
INR Crore
182 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035
Project Cash Flow -65.34 -166.63 35.05 35.02 34.99 34.49 32.75 22.54 31.23 30.52 29.84 29.19 28.56 15.56 27.54
Equity Cash Flow -19.60 -49.99 18.81 4.71 6.20 7.17 6.92 -1.84 8.35 9.11 9.91 10.73 11.58 0.06 27.54
DSCR - - 2.16 1.16 1.22 1.26 1.27 0.92 1.36 1.43 1.50 1.58 1.68 1.00 -
01/Apr/2035 01/Apr/2036 01/Apr/2037 01/Apr/2038 01/Apr/2039 01/Apr/2040 01/Apr/2041 01/Apr/2042 01/Apr/2043 01/Apr/2044 01/Apr/2045 01/Apr/2046 01/Apr/2047 01/Apr/2048 01/Apr/2049
31/Mar/2036 31/Mar/2037 31/Mar/2038 31/Mar/2039 31/Mar/2040 31/Mar/2041 31/Mar/2042 31/Mar/2043 31/Mar/2044 31/Mar/2045 31/Mar/2046 31/Mar/2047 31/Mar/2048 31/Mar/2049 31/Mar/2050
INR Crore
365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365
2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050
Project Cash Flow 27.34 27.15 26.98 26.82 10.07 26.52 26.38 26.25 26.12 26.00 3.64 25.77 25.65 25.54 25.43
Equity Cash Flow 27.34 27.15 26.98 26.82 10.07 26.52 26.38 26.25 26.12 26.00 3.64 25.77 25.65 25.54 25.43
DSCR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Annuity 8.39 8.39 8.39 8.39 8.39 8.39 8.39 8.39 8.39 8.39 8.39 8.39 8.39 8.39
Interest 8.82 8.21 7.60 6.99 6.39 5.78 5.17 4.56 3.95 3.35 2.74 2.13 1.52 0.91
O&M 1.16 1.22 1.28 1.34 1.41 1.48 1.55 1.63 1.71 1.80 1.89 1.98 2.08 2.18
Total Revenue 18.37 17.82 17.27 16.72 16.18 15.65 15.11 14.58 14.05 13.53 13.01 12.50 11.99 11.48
O&M Cost 0.55 0.58 0.61 0.64 0.67 13.06 0.74 0.78 0.82 0.86 0.90 17.50 1.00 1.05
EBITDA 17.81 17.23 16.66 16.08 15.51 2.59 14.37 13.80 13.23 12.67 12.11 (5.00) 10.99 10.44
EBITDA Margin 97.0% 96.7% 96.5% 96.2% 95.8% 16.5% 95.1% 94.6% 94.2% 93.6% 93.1% -40.0% 91.7% 90.9%
Interest 10.07 9.64 8.70 7.78 6.87 5.97 5.04 4.12 3.21 2.30 1.37 0.46 - -
PBT 7.74 7.59 7.96 8.30 8.64 (3.38) 9.33 9.68 10.03 10.38 10.73 (5.46) 10.99 10.44
Tax 1.95 1.91 0.72 1.17 1.58 - 2.31 2.63 2.94 3.22 3.48 - 3.84 3.83
PAT 5.79 5.68 7.24 7.13 7.06 (3.38) 7.02 7.04 7.09 7.16 7.26 (5.46) 7.15 6.61
PAT Margin 31.5% 31.9% 41.9% 42.7% 43.6% -21.6% 46.5% 48.3% 50.5% 52.9% 55.8% -43.7% 59.7% 57.6%
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
01/Apr/2036 01/Apr/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037
INR Crore 31/Mar/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037
365 183 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2037 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038
Annuity 8.39 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Interest 0.30 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
O&M 2.29 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Total Revenue 10.99 - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EBITDA 9.89 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
EBITDA Margin 90.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Interest - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PBT 9.89 - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tax 3.80 - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PAT 6.09 - - - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
PAT Margin 55.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Annexure 11.17 - Balance Sheet
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
01/Oct/2020 01/Apr/2021 01/Apr/2022 01/Apr/2023 01/Apr/2024 01/Apr/2025 01/Apr/2026 01/Apr/2027 01/Apr/2028 01/Apr/2029 01/Apr/2030 01/Apr/2031 01/Apr/2032 01/Apr/2033 01/Apr/2034
INR Crore 31/Mar/2021 31/Mar/2022 31/Mar/2023 31/Mar/2024 31/Mar/2025 31/Mar/2026 31/Mar/2027 31/Mar/2028 31/Mar/2029 31/Mar/2030 31/Mar/2031 31/Mar/2032 31/Mar/2033 31/Mar/2034 31/Mar/2035
182 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035
Share Capital 12.12 43.16 43.16 43.16 43.16 43.16 43.16 43.16 43.16 43.16 43.16 43.16 43.16 43.16 43.16
Reserves - - 5.79 11.48 18.72 25.85 32.91 29.53 36.55 43.60 50.69 57.85 65.11 59.65 66.80
Shareholder's Fund 12.12 43.16 48.96 54.64 61.88 69.01 76.07 72.69 79.72 86.76 93.85 101.01 108.27 102.81 109.96
Term Loan Fund 28.29 100.71 100.71 91.56 82.40 73.25 64.09 54.94 45.78 36.62 27.47 18.31 9.16 - -
Source of Fund 40.41 143.88 149.67 146.20 144.28 142.26 140.17 127.63 125.50 123.39 121.32 119.33 117.43 102.81 109.96
Gross Block 37.96 143.88 143.88 143.88 143.88 143.88 143.88 143.88 143.88 143.88 143.88 143.88 143.88 143.88 143.88
Accumulated Depreciation - - 9.28 18.56 27.85 37.13 46.41 55.69 64.98 74.26 83.54 92.82 102.11 111.39 120.67
Net Block 37.96 143.88 134.60 125.31 116.03 106.75 97.47 88.18 78.90 69.62 60.34 51.05 41.77 32.49 23.21
Cash & Bank 2.45 0.00 15.07 20.88 28.25 35.51 42.70 39.45 46.60 53.77 60.99 68.27 75.65 70.32 86.76
Application of Fund 40.41 143.88 149.67 146.20 144.28 142.26 140.17 127.63 125.50 123.39 121.32 119.33 117.43 102.81 109.96
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
01/Apr/2035 01/Apr/2036 01/Apr/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037
INR Crore 31/Mar/2036 31/Mar/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037
365 365 183 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2036 2037 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038
PAT - - 5.79 5.68 7.24 7.13 7.06 (3.38) 7.02 7.04 7.09 7.16 7.26 (5.46) 7.15
Depreciation - - 9.28 9.28 9.28 9.28 9.28 9.28 9.28 9.28 9.28 9.28 9.28 9.28 9.28
Interest - - 10.07 9.64 8.70 7.78 6.87 5.97 5.04 4.12 3.21 2.30 1.37 0.46 -
Cash Flow from Operating Activities - - 25.15 24.61 25.22 24.20 23.21 11.87 21.34 20.45 19.58 18.74 17.91 4.28 16.44
Net Cash Flow 2.45 (2.45) 15.07 5.81 7.37 7.26 7.19 (3.25) 7.15 7.17 7.22 7.29 7.38 (5.33) 16.44
Opening Cash Balance - 2.45 0.00 15.07 20.88 28.25 35.51 42.70 39.45 46.60 53.77 60.99 68.27 75.65 70.32
Closing Cash Balance 2.45 0.00 15.07 20.88 28.25 35.51 42.70 39.45 46.60 53.77 60.99 68.27 75.65 70.32 86.76
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
01/Apr/2035 01/Apr/2036 01/Apr/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037
INR Crore 31/Mar/2036 31/Mar/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037
365 365 183 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2036 2037 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038
Capital Expenditure - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Cash Flow from Investing Activities - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Equity - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Loan Raised - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Loan Repayed - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Interest Paid - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Cash Flow from Financing Activities - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Project Cash Flow -40.41 -103.47 25.15 24.61 25.22 24.20 23.21 11.87 21.34 20.45 19.58 18.74 17.91 4.28 16.44
Equity Cash Flow -12.12 -31.04 15.07 5.81 7.37 7.26 7.19 -3.25 7.15 7.17 7.22 7.29 7.38 -5.33 16.44
DSCR - - 2.50 1.31 1.41 1.43 1.45 0.78 1.50 1.54 1.58 1.64 1.70 0.45 -
01/Apr/2035 01/Apr/2036 01/Apr/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037 01/Oct/2037
31/Mar/2036 31/Mar/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037 30/Sep/2037
INR Crore
365 365 183 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2036 2037 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038
DSCR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -