0% found this document useful (0 votes)
127 views

State of Nature Decision Good Foreign Competitive Conditionspoor Foreign Competitive Conditions

This document outlines the solution to a decision analysis problem regarding the future of a textile plant. [1] Three alternatives are considered: expand production, maintain status quo, or sell the plant. [2] The problem is analyzed using various decision criteria both with and without assigned probabilities to outcomes. [3] Expected values, expected opportunity losses, and value of perfect information are calculated to determine the best decision is to maintain the status quo.

Uploaded by

Queenie Valle
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
127 views

State of Nature Decision Good Foreign Competitive Conditionspoor Foreign Competitive Conditions

This document outlines the solution to a decision analysis problem regarding the future of a textile plant. [1] Three alternatives are considered: expand production, maintain status quo, or sell the plant. [2] The problem is analyzed using various decision criteria both with and without assigned probabilities to outcomes. [3] Expected values, expected opportunity losses, and value of perfect information are calculated to determine the best decision is to maintain the status quo.

Uploaded by

Queenie Valle
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

The following example will illustrate the solution procedure for a decision analysis problem.

Problem Statement

T. Bone Puckett, a corporate raider, has acquired a textile company and is contemplating the future of
one of its major plants, located in South Carolina. Three alternative decisions are being considered :
(1) expand the plant and produce lightweight, durable materials for possible sales to the military, a
market with little foreign competition; (2) maintain the status quo at the plant, continuing production of
textile goods that are subject to heavy foreign competition; or (3) sell the plant now. If one of the first
two alternatives is chosen , the plant will still be sold at the end of a year. The amount of profit that
could be earned by selling the plant in a year depends on foreign market conditions, including the
status of a trade embargo bill in Congress. The following payoff table describes this decision
situation:

[Page 548]
  State of Nature
Decision Good Foreign Competitive ConditionsPoor Foreign Competitive Conditions
Expand $ 800,000 $ 500,000
Maintain status quo 1,300,000 150,000
Sell now 320,000 320,000

1. Determine the best decision by using the following decision criteria:


1. Maximax
2. Maximin
3. Minimax regret
4. Hurwicz ( a = .3)
5. Equal likelihood
2. Assume that it is now possible to estimate a probability of .70 that good foreign competitive
conditions will exist and a probability of .30 that poor conditions will exist. Determine the best
decision by using expected value and expected opportunity loss.
3. Compute the expected value of perfect information.
4. Develop a decision tree, with expected values at the probability nodes.
5. T. Bone Puckett has hired a consulting firm to provide a report on future political and market
situations. The report will be positive (P) or negative (N), indicating either a good (g) or poor
(p) future foreign competitive situation. The conditional probability of each report outcome,
given each state of nature, is

P (Pg) = .70

P (Ng) = .30

P (Pp) = .20

P (Np) = .80

Determine the posterior probabilities by using Bayes's rule.


6. Perform a decision tree analysis by using the posterior probability obtained in (e).

Solution

Step  1. (part A): Determine Decisions Without Probabilities

Maximax:   
Expand $ 800,000 
Status 1,300,000  Maximum
quo
Sell 320,000 

Decision: Maintain status quo.

[Page 549]
Maximin:    
Expand $ 500,000  Maximum
Status -150,000 
quo
Sell 320,000 

Decision: Expand.

Minimax    
regret:
Expand $500,000  Minimum
Status quo 650,000 
Sell 980,000 

Decision: Expand.

Hurwicz ( a = .3):  


Expand $800,000(.3) + 500,000(.7) = $590,000
Status quo $1,300,000(.3) 150,000(.7) = $285,000
Sell $ 320,000(.3) + 320,000(.7) = $ 320,000

Decision: Expand.

Equal  
likelihood:
Expand $800,000(.50) + 500,000(.50) = $650,000
Status quo $1,300,000(.50) 150,000(.50) = $575,000
Sell $320,000(.50) + 320,000(.50) = $320,000
Decision: Expand.

Step  2. (part B): Determine Decisions with EV and EOL

Expected  
value:
Expand $800,000(.70) + 500,000(.30) = $710,000
Status quo $1,300,000(.70) 150,000(.30) = $865,000
Sell $320,000(.70) + 320,000(.30) = $320,000

Decision: Maintain status quo.

Expected opportunity loss:


Expand $500,000(.70) + 0(.30) = $350,000
Status $0(.70) + 650,000(.30) = $195,000
quo
Sell $980,000(.70) + 180,000(.30) = $740,000

Decision: Maintain status quo.

Step  3. (part C): Compute EVPI

expected value given perfect information= 1,300,000(.70) + 500,000(.30)


  = $1,060,000

[Page 550]
expected value without perfect information= $1,300,000(.70) 150,000(.30)
  = $865,000
EVPI= $1,060,000 865,000 = $195,000
Step  4. (part D): Develop a Decision Tree

Step  5. (part E): Determine Posterior Probabilities


[Page 551]
Step  6. (part F): Perform Decision Tree Analysis with Posterior Probabilities

You might also like