Unit 1
Unit 1
UNIT STRUCTURE
1.2 INTRODUCTION
The response to poetry as the impulse to write it is often innate. That
is perhaps not surprising. After all, even the most significant scientific
discoveries are ultimately intuitive. So why not get to know what it is
all about? But why poetry? Can’t we do it all with good old prose? The
answer, history tells us, is a definitive ‘no’. Our earliest extant literature
is poetry, be it the Ramayana or the Illiad. It would not do either to
ignore the centuries of oral literature before the first word came to be
written. Poetry gives us pleasure and an insight into reality. It enriches
our understanding of life. Poetry, as W. B. Yeats says, is the social act
of the solitary man. It is about man in society. A poem is ‘an answering
look’ given back by the poet to life:
“Poetry
I, too, dislike it: there are things that are important beyond all
this fiddle.
Reading it, however, with a perfect contempt for it, one
discovers in it after all, a place for the genuine……….”
LET US KNOW
many. A successful communication is that where meanings are epic, drama, sat-
mutually available. We have, therefore, to underline the primacy ire, novel etc.
course’. So, far from escaping the ‘touch’ of years, she is now
undergoing a daily contact with the earth. The use of the solemn
Latinism ‘diurnal’, the only three- syllable word in this mainly
monosyllabic poem, completes the contrast. But the final
impression the poem leaves is not of two contrasting moods,
but of a single mood mounting to a climax in the pantheistic
magnificence of the last two lines. The identity of the metrical
pattern in the two verses is paralleled by the virtual identity of
the word- order, helping to reconcile the moods. The gap between
the two verses is also bridged by the negatives. As the first line
really means ‘I was not mentally awake’, all the sentences are
essentially negative propositions, until we reach the tremendous
Pantheism — positive of the last two lines. The alliteration in the last two
lines implies that the pantheistic universe is solidly one. The all
belief that God is in
importance of meaning and the comparative insignificance of
everything. Pan- all,
sound may be seen from the above analysis.
theism- belief in one
God as creator On the other hand, Pope demanded that ‘the sound must seem
an echo to the sense’, and we can see that when Coleridge
Alliteration — writes of ice:
“It cracked and growled, and roared and howled,
repetition of initial
Like noises in a swond.”
consonant sounds
The sounds, likewise, support the meaning in the following lines
from Tennyson:
“The moan of doves in immemorial elms,
And murmuring of innumerable bees.”
A similar function of sound and internal rhyme is noticeable in
the following poem by Louis MacNeice:
Shelley, in ‘The Cloud’, exploits sounds and internal rhymes for pure,
simple description. His descriptions, however, are also scientifically
exact.
Such rhyming lines may attract too much attention to themselves and
they appear mechanical. It can be used unexpectedly to add emphasis
and cohesion. Shakespeare’s ‘Sonnet 86’ and Eliot’s ‘The Dry Salvages’
will serve to illustrate the point.
“Tomb” and “Womb” are tied together by the rhyme emphasizing them
as important concepts in the statement. There is a more complex use
in Eliot’s ‘The Dry Salvages’:
Rhyme, rhythm, metre, music are used and exploited in poems for
different purposes. The examples above are serious, even too serious.
But it is not necessary to be solemn to be serious. Chaucer (1340-
1400), in the late Middle Ages, writes in rhyme, and rhyme adds to the
surprise element of his lines and underscore their humour:
LET US KNOW
LET US KNOW
‘The Turtle’
.........................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
poetry as well as prose and should know the difference. Poetry and
prose are different though both draw from the same resource base-
the language of the community. Metre makes poetry purposely formal
and the reader is invited to and warned about a different kind of writing
than prose. When we try to reduce a poem to a prose statement or
make a paraphrase of it, we tend to separate the form from its content.
Cleanth Brooks calls it the ‘heresy of paraphrase’. In poetry and the
arts in general, intuition and expression are not separate. It is through
the medium that the poet intuits and expresses. A paraphrase also
ignores metre and misconceives metaphor.
The earth has nothing more fair to show. He who could pass by
a night so moving in its majesty must be dull of soul. The city
now wears the beauty of the morning like a garment. It is silent
and bare. Ships, towers, domes, theatres and temples lie open
unto the fields and unto the sky. All of them lie bright and glittering
in the smokeless air.
The sun never stopped valley, rock, or hill more beautifully in his
first splendor. I never saw, never felt so deep a calm! The river
glides at his own sweet will. Dear God! The very houses seem
asleep. The mighty heart of the city is lying still.
may simply be a proper name. But we happen to know that the stages
of man’s life are often compared to the seasons. The title refers to
‘Spring’ and ‘Fall’ (Autumn) and is addressed to a ‘young child’. Spring
is the golden period of life and in Fall or Autumn, leaves grow yellow
or golden. The compounding is justified and not just a gratuitous
Neologism — invention. But another ‘neologism’ “unleaving” immediately follows it
and the unleaving of Goldengrove does not remain a mere fact of
a word coined to
nature. Now, as the poem develops, we come across two lines which
express the poet’s
could be meaningful independently or in isolation. But in the context of
exact feelings
the development of the poem, the lines also qualify the ‘Fall’ of the title
and the fall of man is implied unobtrusively. When it does that,
“Goldengrove” gains a general significance while remaining a proper
name. It could very well be Eden. As a young girl, Margaret can well
grieve for the unleaving of Goldengrove, because for her, the leaves
are like “the things of man”. But,
Poetry uses language precisely and exploits all its resources. Some
words lose their contours because of constant and varied use. Poets
often have to create words to express their ideas and feelings. Words
are also historical counters. In the following sonnet (see Unit 2 Sec i)
by Milton, usually known as ‘On his Blindness’, we have to fall back
on the OED to know what ‘fondly’ meant in Milton’s time.
The OED tells us that in the seventeenth century ‘fondly’ meant ‘foolishly’. OED —
The poet therefore says that he asked this potentially blasphemous The Oxford English
question ‘foolishly’, for of course God is just and could not be guilty of Dictionary - a multi-
making demands. Poets like Robert Frost are, apparently, more volume comprehen-
demanding of God: sive lexicon show-
And I’ll forgive Thy great big one on me.” first use of a word.
.........................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................
In oral or folk literature, the poet was often anonymous and verses
were made up instantly. Since they were transmitted only by word of
mouth, there were many versions of the same poem or song or story.
These will be discussed in more detail when we consider the history
and variety of poetry in Unit 2. Whatever a singer or story teller said
was immediately understood by the community. There was a strong
sense of community then that the Romantic poets (19th century) feel
nostalgic about. The Romantics of the nineteenth century and the earlier
sixteenth- seventeenth century Romantic Movement were more indi-
vidualistic. That subjective emphasis not only continued but became
more intense in the modern age. No one seems to speak for the
community. Everyone speaks for himself/ herself. Consequently, poetry
could no longer communicate so easily. It became increasingly more
complex and difficult, even obscure. We have shown that if we know
the history and development of poetry down the ages, we can receive
poetry better and that is a necessary step in learning to write poetry.
We have also said that the faculty of writing poetry is often intimate.
But even those who are ‘born’ poets have to learn. A person who can
sing has to learn music to be a musician or even a singer. If one is
sensitive and observant there is much poetry to be gathered from the
life around us. This is what Wallace Stevens seems to imply when he
calls poetry an ‘answering look’; Marianne Moore is deliberately ‘pro-
saic’ in her “poetry’ to underline the fact that nothing is inherently ‘po-
etic’ or ‘unpoetic’. The poet purifies the language of the tribe and leaves
it richer. That is primarily because of the use of metaphoric language.
Like poetry, its medium, that is language, too changes. But the roots
in speech, especially in the spoken language of the rural folk, must
never be forgotten. Folk language is vitally metaphoric. This is evident
in expressions like ‘her face clouded over’. Poetry tries to be con-
sciously metaphoric. Not that there are no attempts to the contrary. In
fact, however inspired a poet may be, s/he must learn his craft and
must master his language in such a way that he can make the ‘tra-
ditional’ into something ‘novel’. It also, at the same time, must be
personal, i.e. the poet creates his own idiom. It is not necessarily a
question of coining new words. It is a fresh way of saying things that
we find in the poetry of Hopkins, Emily Dickinson, Ogden Mash and
others.
The eighteenth century English poets- the neo- classicists, as they are
called, underlined this craft or rhetoric of poetry. Pope had in fact
defined poetry as “what oft was thought but never so well expresst”.
The Romantics didn’t quite agree. Attitudes to poetry and its definitions
continue to change and because it changes and grows, it remains so
vitally alive and interesting. The subject of poetry and its nature and
function will be found addressed in the following poem by W. H. Auden
on W. B. Yeats’ death:
As Elizabeth Drew (Drew, 1959) says, the beginning of the first part of
the poem, besides evoking the natural and cultural weather of the time
of Yeats’ death uses a metaphoric language where landscape is
symbolic of inner qualities. While the first part concerns the man and
his environs, the second distinguishes between the man and the poet.
Yeats was also quite fallibly human and the death of the man is not the
important part. What is important is that the poetry survives:
Poetry can make nothing happen in the world of political and bureau-
cratic action but it survives language, in the words in which it is said.
*****