Design Thinking For Marketing Session 1 PDF
Design Thinking For Marketing Session 1 PDF
§ Introductions
§ Course background
§ Introduction to Design Thinking
§ Overview of the assignments
RMIT University 2
Nico Klenner
Professional experience
Marketing Manager I Consumer Electronics I Denmark
Digital Marketing Consultant & Analyst I Denmark & Germany
3
Who are you?
§ Your new friend has the pleasure to introduce you to the class
(max 60 seconds)
4
How to succeed in this class
In total, you will need a grade of 4.0 (=50%) or better to pass the
class successfully
5
Learning objectives
6
Key takeaways from today
7
Design Thinking
8
RMIT University Information Technology Services 8
Design Thinking for Marketing
9
Design Thinking for Marketing
10
Design Thinking for Marketing
11
Design Thinking for Marketing
12
Finding the sweet spot of Innovation
13
Market-Driven Innovation
Start here
14
Technology-Centered Innovation
Start here
15
Human-Centered Innovation
We start here
16
Design Thinking as a process
17
RMIT University Information Technology Services 17
Course background & outline
18
RMIT University©2008 Information Technology Services
Design vs Marketing
19
Why teach DT to marketing students?
1Liedtka, King & Bennett, 2013; 2Beverland & Farrelly, 2011; 3Beverland et al, 2015; 4Subin & Workman, 2004; 5Barney,
1991; 6Porter, 1996; 7Lee & Benza, 2015
20
RMIT University Information Technology Services
Why is DT difficult for marketing students?
Comprehension Warrant
Understand Why laddering
Backing
Analysis
How laddering
Ideate Synthesis Claim
Idea selection
23
1. DT and CT aligned
Examine Knowledge
… digging deep into the problem … the attainment of terminology,
and getting to know the context, facts, conventions, principles,
history, objects and people theories, and structures
involved
11Fischer, 2002 24
1. Research
Educational activity:
Research
§ Generate deep
understanding of a
problem space
§ Be curious
25
2. DT and CT aligned
Understand Analysis
… finding patterns and … breaking down all knowledge
relationships that highlight deep into its components and identifying
insights relationships amongst them
… uncover human needs
Comprehension
… translating, comparing and
interpreting all knowledge attained
… non-judgmental, formative,
… judgmental, testable, linear
associative
26
2. Why laddering
Educational activity:
Why-laddering
§ Translate and interpret
knowledge to uncover
underlying human needs
through empathy
§ Ask “why?”
27
3. DT and CT aligned
Ideate Synthesis
… generation of ideas and … uses all parts identified and
solutions to find an answer related during analyses to
generate new insights and find the
answer
28
3a. How laddering
Educational activity:
How-laddering
§ Generate possible
abstract solutions that
aim to fulfill those
human needs
§ Ask “how?”
29
3b. Idea selection
Educational activity:
Now-Wow-How grid
§ Categorize your solutions
based on effort and
innovation potential
§ Find Wow! solutions
30
4. DT and CT aligned
Experiment Application
… concretizing solutions informed … the use of acquired and
by iterative feedback loops synthesized insights in new
situations
31
4. Prototyping
Educational activity:
32
5. DT and CT aligned
Distill Evaluation
… stripping down the solution to … the presentation and defense
its essentials and communicating of synthesized and applied
it to others convincingly insights
33
5. Argumentation
Educational activity:
Argumentation map
§ Convince someone to
employ a proposed
innovative solution by
providing a sound and
strong argument12
§ Argumentation Theory13 14
12Feast & Blijlevens, 2015; 13Toulmin, Rieke & Janik, 1984; 14Toulmin, 2003 34
Assignments
35
RMIT University©2008 Information Technology Services
Individual report (60%)
38
10 things that require zero talent
§ Being on time
§ Work ethics
§ Effort
§ Body language
§ Energy
§ Attitude
§ Passion
§ Being coachable
§ Doing extra
§ Being prepared
39
Our shared rules
§ Be present
§ Give your best
§ Help each other
§ Discuss with each other
§ Be fair to each other
§ Keep track of time
§ HAVE FUN!
41
Tentative class schedule II
Date Topic Educational activities
Session 9
Argumentation – case study Argument map
(03.12.)
Session 10
Argumentation Argument map
(10.12.)
Session 11
Presentation techniques Peer review
(17.12.)
Session 12
Course wrap-up + Q&A Session
(07.01.)
14.01. Group presentation
42
Relevant literature
§ Martin, R. (2009). The design of business: Why design thinking is the
next competitive advantage. Harvard Business Press.
§ Brown, T., & Katz, B. (2011). Change by design. Journal of Product
Innovation Management, 28(3), 381-383.
§ Feast, L., & Blijlevens, J. (2014). Mixed method research procedure
for design education. DS 81: Proceedings of NordDesign 2014,
Espoo, Finland 27-29th August 2014.
§ Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge University
Press.
§ Verganti, R. (2009). Design driven innovation: changing the rules of
competition by radically innovating what things mean. Harvard
Business Press.
§ Glen, R., Suciu, C., & Baughn, C. (2014). The need for design
thinking in business schools. Academy of Management Learning &
Education, 13(4), 653-667.
RMIT University Information Technology Services
Thanks for today!
44
RMIT University©2008 Information Technology Services