Control Volume Approach
Control Volume Approach
Control Volume Approach
Fig. 10.1: Lagrangian description - Identify a small mass of fluid in a flow, called a fluid
particle and describe its motion with time
In the Lagrangian description, we must keep track of the position and velocity of individual
particles. Newton’s laws are used to describe the motion of such objects and we can
accurately predict where they go and how momentum and kinetic energy are exchanged from
one object to another. In case of fluid flow, we can generate a series of pathlines are
streamlines through the flow field and determine flow properties at any point along the lines
by applying Euler’s or Bernoulli’s equation. As you can imagine, this method of describing
motion of fluid is very difficult. From a microscopic point of view, a fluid is composed of
billions of molecules that are continuously banging into one another.The task of tracking even
a subset of these molecules is quite difficult, even for our fastest and largest computers.
However, there are many practical applications of the Lagrangian description, such as the
tracking of passive scalars in a flow model of contaminant transport and the development of
flow visualization and measurement system based on particle tracking method.
Page | 1
Control Volume Approach
Fig. 10.2: Eulerian approach - Fix a point (window) in the flow field and describe the velocity
of the particles passing through this point
A more common method of describing fluid flow is the Eulerian description of fluid motion.
In the Eulerian description of fluid flow, a finite volume called a flow domain or control
volume is defined, through which fluid flows in and out. Instead of tracking individual fluid
particles, we define field variables such as pressure, velocity, acceleration, etc. as functions
of space and time within the control volume. The field variable at a particular location at a
particular time is the value of the variable for whichever fluid particle happens to occupy that
location at that time instant. The field variables are defined as
Pressure field: P P( x, y, z, t )
Velocity field: V V ( x, y, z, t )
Acceleration field: a a( x, y, z, t )
Therefore, in the Eulerian approach we don’t really care what happens to individual fluid
particles; rather we are concerned with the pressure, velocity, acceleration, etc., of whichever
particle happens to be at the location of interest at the time of interest.
The difference between these two descriptions is made clearer by imagining a person
standing beside a river, measuring its properties. In the Lagrangian approach, he throws in a
probe that moves downstream with water. In the Eulerian approach, he anchors the probe at
a fixed location in the water.
While there are many occasions in which the Lagrangian description is useful, the Eulerian
description is often more convenient for fluid mechanics applications. Furthermore,
experimental measurements are generally more suited to the Eulerian description. However,
the equations of motion in the Lagrangian description following individual fluid particles are
well known (e.g. Newton’s law), the equations of motion of fluid flow are not so readily
apparent in the Eulerian description and must be carefully derived. We do this for control
volume (integral) analysis via the Reynolds Transport Theorem.
Page | 2
Control Volume Approach
is important in analyzing water supply systems, natural gas distribution networks, and river
flows. The equations for calculating flow rates are developed in this section.
Discharge or volume flow rate
The discharge, Q, often called the volume flow rate, is the volume of fluid that passes through
an area per unit time. Typical units for discharge are ft3/s (cfs), ft3/min (cfm), gpm, m3/s, and
L/s.
Consider the idealized flow of fluid in a pipe as shown in Fig. 5.3 in which the velocity (V) is
constant across the pipe section. Suppose a marker is injected over the cross section at
section A-A for a period of time Δt. The fluid that passes A-A in time Δt is represented by the
marked volume. The length of the marked volume is VΔt so the volume is Δ = AVΔt, where
A is the cross-sectional area of the pipe. The volume flow per unit time past A-A is
Q lim VA (10.1)
t 0 t
which will be referred to as the discharge or volume flow rate equation. It is important to
realize that discharge refers to a volume flow rate.
In many problems—for example, those involving flow in pipes—one may know the discharge
and need to find the mean (average) velocity without knowing the actual velocity distribution
across the pipe section. By definition, the mean velocity is the discharge divided by the cross-
sectional area,
Q
V (10.3)
A
The volume flow rate equation can be generalized by using the concept of the dot product. In
Fig. 5.5 the flow velocity vector is not normal to the surface but is oriented at an angle θ with
Page | 3
Control Volume Approach
respect to the direction that is normal to the surface. The only component of velocity that
contributes to the flow through the differential area dA is the component normal to the area,
Vn. The differential discharge through area dA is
dQ Vn dA (10.4)
Figure 10.4: Velocity vector is oriented at angle θ with respect to the normal.
If the vector, dA, is defined with magnitude equal to the differential area, dA, and direction
normal to the surface, then Vn dA V cos dA V dA , where V dA is the dot product of the
two vectors. Thus a more general equation for the discharge or volume flow rate through a
surface A is
Q V dA (10.5)
A
If the velocity is constant over the area and the area is a planar surface, then the discharge is
given as
Q V A (10.6)
If, in addition, the velocity and area vectors are aligned, then
Q VA (10.7)
which reverts to the original equation developed for discharge, Eq. (10.1).
Mass Flow Rate
The mass flow rate, is the mass of fluid passing through a cross-sectional area per unit time.
The common units for mass flow rate are kg/s, lbm/s, and slugs/s. Using the same approach
as for volume flow rate, the mass of the fluid in the marked volume in Fig. 5.3 is
m
m lim lim Q AV (10.8)
t 0 t t 0 t
The generalized form of the mass flow equation corresponding to Eq. (5.4) is
m V dA (10.9)
A
where both the velocity and fluid density can vary over the cross-sectional area.
Page | 4
Control Volume Approach
Figure 10.5: System, control volume and control surface in a flow field
Page | 5
Control Volume Approach
of mechanics (conservation of mass, the linear momentum relation, the angular momentum
relation, and the energy equation) then state what happens when there is an interaction
between the system and its surroundings.
These laws apply to either fluid or solid systems. They are ideal for solid mechanics, where
we follow the same system forever because it represents the product we are designing and
building. For example, we follow a beam as it deflects under load. We follow a piston as it
oscillates. We follow a rocket system all the way to Mars.
But fluid systems do not demand this concentrated attention. Instead it is likely that the fluid
forms the environment whose effect on our product we wish to know. We wish to know the
wind loads on the beam, but where the fluid particles in the wind go after they leave the beam
is of little interest to a beam designer. We need to convert the system laws to apply to a
specific region, which the system may occupy for only an instant. The system passes on, and
other systems come along, but no matter. The basic laws are reformulated to apply to
this local region called a control volume. The control volume resembles the free-body
concept, which is applied to systems in solid mechanics analyses.
To convert a system analysis to a control volume analysis, we must convert our mathematics
to apply to a specific region rather than to individual masses. This conversion, called the
Reynolds transport theorem, can be applied to all the basic laws. This also relates the Eulerian
and Lagrangian approaches.
Energy per
unit mass
Consider a system with properties as in Figure 10.1(a). When it is divided into two equal
halves the magnitude of extensive properties reduces to half the original value, whereas the
intensive property values remain unaltered as in Figure 10.1(b).
Page | 6
Control Volume Approach
(a) (b)
Figure 10.1: (a) A system with given properties and (b) System divided into two
equal halves
The amount of extensive property B contained in a control volume at a given instant is given
by
Bcv dm d (10.10)
cv cv
Where dm and d are the differential mass and differential volume, respectively and the
integral is carried out over the control volume.
Page | 7
Control Volume Approach
At section 2: m2 2 A2 V2
Sign convention: it is obvious that all surface areas have two sides, so we must establish a
rate is that the area vector always points outward from control volume as shown in Fig. 10.6.
Therefore, at inlet it is always negative ( V1 A1 V1 A1 ) and at outlet it is always positive (
V2 A2 V2 A2 )
Figure 10.8: The control surfaces represented by area vectors and velocities
velocity vectors.
The net mass outflow rate 2 A2 V2 1 A1 V1
= 2 V2 A2 1V1 A1 (10.12)
mnet = V A
cs
i. The above states that if dot product V A is summed for all control surfaces
of a control volume the result is the net mass flow rate out of the control
volume.
ii. If the summation is positive, the net mass flow rate is out of the control volume, if it is
negative, the net mass flow rate is into the CV.
iii. If the inflow and out flow rates are equal V A 0
cs
In a similar manner, the net rate of flow of an extensive property B out of the control volume
is
Bnet V A (10.13)
cs
m
The above derivations are applicable for all one dimension flows. To reinforce the validity of
the above equation one may consider the dimensions involved. The above equation states that
the flow rate of B is given by
m
B mass B
flow rate of B B (10.14)
mass time time
For velocity varying across a flow section, the velocity across the section needs to be integrated
to obtain the flow rate and therefore the general expression for net rate of out flow of an
extensive property is written as
Bnet V d A (10.15)
cs m
The above equation will be used in the most general form of the Reynolds transport theorem.
Page | 8
Control Volume Approach
Recall that our objective is to relate the rate of change of any arbitrary extensive
property B, of the system to the time variations of the property associated with the
control volume. From the definition of a derivative, the rate of change of extensive
property Bsys of the system is given by
dBsys Bsys ,t t Bsys ,t
lim (10.18)
dt t 0 t
Here, Bin defines the extensive property that has moved into the control volume in
time t , Bout defines the extensive property that has moved out of the CV in time t
. From Eq. (1.2)
Bsys ,t t Bcv , t t Bin Bout (10.19)
Page | 9
Control Volume Approach
= lim
B cv , t t Bcv , t
lim
Bout B
lim in
(10.20)
t 0 t t 0 t t 0 t
Term 1: lim
B cv , t t Bcv ,t
dBcv
t 0 t dt
Bout
Term 2: lim Bout
t 0 t
Bin
Term 3: lim Bin
t 0 t
It is important to mention in this context that in the derivation of RTT, the control
volume is considered to be fixed in a frame of reference in which the velocity field is
described. Moreover, for evaluation of rates of outflow and inflow of properties, the
velocities must be measured with respect to the control surface because it relates to
the mass flux across the surface. Eq. (10.22) is the most general form of Reynolds
transport theorem. The left side of the equation is the Lagrangian form; that is, the rate
of change of property B evaluated moving with the system. The right side is the
Eulerian form; that is, the change of property B evaluated in the control volume and
the flux measured at the control surface. The application of this equation is called the
Control volume approach.
The Reynolds Transport equation may be expressed in words as
Rate of change Rate of change Net outflow
of property B of property B of property B
of system in control volume through control surface
This equation also provides the connection between the Lagrangian and Eulerian
descriptions of fluid.
Page | 10
Control Volume Approach
dBsys d
dt cv
d V A (10.23)
dt cs
where the summation is carried out for each port crossing the control surface. An
alternative form can be written in terms of the mass flow rates as
dBsys d
d mo o mi i (10.24)
dt dt cv cs cs
for steady state = 0 outlets inlets
However,
dmsys
0 (10.26)
dt
Therefore,
d
dV CS VdA 0
dt CV
(10.27)
Page | 11
Control Volume Approach
A V
out out
AV in in
(10.30)
If there are more than two ports, then the general form of the continuity equation for steady
flow is
m
cs
out min
cs
(10.31)
Q
cs
out Qin
cs
(10.32)
V .A 0
cs
(10.33)
10.8 Examples
Example 10.1: A 10 cm jet of water issues from a 1m diameter tank, as shown in Figure 11.2.
Assume that the velocity in the jet is 2gh m/s. How long will it take for the tank surface in
the tank to drop from ho=2m to hf =0.5m?
Page | 12
Control Volume Approach
Solution:
Using continuity equation
d
mcv mout min 0
dt cs cs
d
mcv mout V . A
dt
Accumulation rate term,
d dh
mcv AT
dt dt
AT is the cross sectional area of the tank and inflow of mass is equal to 0. The Outflow mass
term is given by,
m
cs
out AV
1 1 A1 2 gh
AT
dt dh
A1 2 gh
Integrating on both sides
2 AT
t h C
A1 2 g
At t = 0, h = ho
Page | 13
Control Volume Approach
2 AT
h C
A1 2 g
2 AT
t ( ho h ) (10.1)
A1 2 g
Example 10.2: Consider the Figure 11.3 given below. Find the velocity in pipe 2 with an area
of 0.2 m2. The velocity in pipe 1 and 3 are 5 m/s and 12 m/s. Their respective area of cross
sections are 0.2 and 0.3 m2. Discharge through pipe 4 is 0.1 m3/s.
m
cs
out min
cs
A1 V1 A2 V2 A3 V3 Q4
V2 4.5m / s
Note: At pipe 2, flow is going into the network.
Page | 14
Control Volume Approach
Example 10.3: As shown in Figure 10.5, water flows steadily into a tank through pipes 1 and
2 and discharges at a steady rate out of the tank through pipes 3 and 4. The mean velocity in
pipe 1, 2, and 3 is 50 ft/s, and the hypothetical outflow velocity in pipe 4 varies linearly from
zero at the wall to a maximum at the center of the pipe. What are the mass rate of flow and
the discharge from pipe 4, and what is the maximum velocity in pipe 4?
cs
Qi cs Qo
Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2
Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3
V1 A1 V2 A2 V3 A3
50 D12 D22 D32
4
50
4 144
1
1 22 1.52
Q4 0.750ft 3 s 0.021 m3 s
In pipe 4,
r
V Vmax 1
r0
Page | 15
Control Volume Approach
r0 r
Q VdA Vmax 1 2 rdr
r0
A 0
r0 r
Q 2 Vmax 1 rdr
r0
0
1 1
2 Vmax r02
2 3
1
Vmax r02
3
3Q 3 0.750
Vmax 2.86 ft/s 0.872 m/s Ans.
r02 12 2
Example 10.4: Consider the boundary layer formed when an incompressible fluid flows over
a flat plate. The velocity profile within the boundary layer at any section is given by Vx = V0
f(ƞ) where ƞ = y/δ with δ as the boundary layer thickness at that location. Outside the
boundary layer the x component of the velocity is V0 everywhere.
(a) Using ABCD as the CV, show that mass crosses into the boundary layer at CD.
(b) To find Vy near the edge of the boundary layer, use ABCE as the CV.
For f(ƞ) = (3/2) ƞ- (1/2) ƞ3, determine Vy at ƞ =1.
Solution:
d
Vx dy dm Vx dy Vx dy x
dx 0
across DC
0
0
across AD across BC
d
1
f d for
dm d 3 1 3
Vx dy V0
dx dx 0 dx 0 2 2
dm 5 d 5
V0 d m V0 d
dx 8 dx 8
int oCV
DE = δy
By mass continuity
Page | 16
Control Volume Approach
Vx dy V0d Vy dx Vx dy
0
0
acrossDE acrossCE
acrossAD acrossBC
1 1
V0 f d V0 d Vy dx V0 f d
0 0
1 5 3 d
f d V y V0
0 8 8 dx
Page | 17