Audit of Cash
Audit of Cash
CHAPTER 2
2. AUDIT OF CASH AND MARKETABLE SECURITIES
Consider how cash registers can greatly enhance control over cash sales.
Study Objective 3 - Explain the Applications of Internal Control to Cash Disbursement
1. Cash is disbursed to pay expenses and liabilities or to purchase assets.
a. Internal control over cash disbursements is more effective when payments are made by
check, rather than by cash, except for incidental amounts that are paid out of petty cash.
b. Cash payments are generally made only after specific control procedures have been
followed.
c. The paid check provides proof of payment.
d. The principles of internal control apply to cash disbursements as follows:
Establishment of responsibility - Only designated personnel (treasurer) are
authorized to sign checks.
Make all disbursements by check or electronic fund transfer, with the
exception f small expenditures from petty cash.
~5~
A monthly bank reconciliation of the general bank account on a timely basis by someone
independent of the handling or recording of cash receipts and disbursements is an essential
control over the ending cash balance. Companies with significant cash balances and large
volumes of cash transactions may reconcile cash on a daily basis to online banking records. The
reconciliation ensures that the accounting records reflect the same cash balance as the actual
amount of cash in the bank after considering reconciling items. More important, the independent
reconciliation provides an opportunity for an internal verification of cash receipts and
disbursements transactions.
Careful bank reconciliation includes the following actions:
• Compare cancelled checks or electronic bank records of payment with the cash
disbursements records for date, payee and amount
Examine cancelled checks or electronic bank records of payment for signature,
endorsement, and cancellation
Compare deposits in the bank with recorded cash receipts for date, customer, and amount
Account for the numerical sequence of checks, and investigate missing ones
Reconcile all items causing a difference between the book and bank balance and verify
their appropriateness for the client’s business
Reconcile total debits on the bank statement with the totals in the cash disbursements
records
Reconcile total credits on the bank statement with the totals in the cash receipts records
~8~
If the client has already prepared bank reconciliation, there is no need for duplicating the work.
However, the auditors should examine/inspect the reconciliation in detain to satisfy themselves
that it has been properly prepared. Auditors test the bank reconciliation to determine whether
client personnel have carefully prepared the bank reconciliation and to verify whether the client’s
recorded bank balance is the same amount as the actual cash in the bank except for deposits in
transit, outstanding checks, and other reconciling items.
In verifying the reconciliation, the auditor uses information in the cutoff bank statement to verify
the appropriateness of reconciling items. The auditor’s verification of the reconciliation involves
several procedures:
• Verify that the client’s bank reconciliation is mathematically accurate.
• Trace the balance on the bank confirmation and/or the beginning balance on the cutoff
statement to the balance per bank on the bank reconciliation to ensure they are the same.
• Trace checks written and recorded before year-end and included with the cutoff bank
statement to the list of outstanding checks on the bank reconciliation and to the cash
disbursements journal in the period or periods prior to the balance sheet date. All checks
that cleared the bank after the balance sheet date and were included in the cash
disbursements journal should also be included on the outstanding check list. If a check
was included in the cash disbursements journal, it should be included as an outstanding
check if it did not clear before the balance sheet date. Similarly, if a check cleared the
bank before the balance sheet date, it should not be on the bank reconciliation.
• Investigate all significant checks included on the outstanding check list that have not
cleared the bank on the cutoff statement. The first step in the investigation should be to
trace the amount of any items not clearing to the cash disbursements journal. The reason
for the check not being cashed should be discussed with the client, and if the auditor is
concerned about the possibility of fraud, the vendor’s accounts payable balance should be
confirmed to determine whether the vendor has recognized the receipt of the cash in its
records. In addition, a copy of the cancelled check should be examined before the last day
of the audit if it becomes available.
• Trace deposits in transit to the cutoff bank statement. All cash receipts not deposited in the
bank at the end of the year should be traced to the cutoff bank statement to make sure that
they were deposited shortly after the beginning of the new year.
• Account for other reconciling items on the bank statement and bank reconciliation. These
include such items as bank service charges, bank errors and corrections, and unrecorded
transactions debited or credited directly to the bank account by the bank. These
~9~
reconciling items should be investigated to be sure that they have been treated properly by
the client.
With respect to checks that were shown as outstanding at the year-end, the auditors should
determine the dates on which the bank paid these checks. By noting the dates of payment of
these checks, the auditors can determine whether the time intervals between the dates of the
check and the time of payment by bank were unreasonably long. Unreasonable delay in the
presentation of these checks for payment constitutes a strong implication that the checks were
not mailed by the client until sometime after the close of the year.
In examining the cut-off bank statement, the auditors will also watch for any paid checks issued
on or before the balance sheet date but not listed as outstanding on the client’s year-end bank
reconciliation. Thus, the cut-off bank statement provides assurance that the amount of cash
shown on the balance sheet was not overstated by omission of one or more checks from listing of
checks outstanding.
The cash count should be made simultaneously with the inspection of investments and
negotiable instrument. This requirement prevents the auditor from double counting these
assets. Furthermore, all cash should be controlled throughout the time of the cash count to
avoid the possibility of the auditor again being misled into counting a specified amount of
cash more than once. A common way of achieving this control is to seal each container of
cash immediately after it has been counted. After the count of all each has been completed,
the auditor should retrace the counting cycle to certify that the individual seals were not
broken after the cash in them was counted.
The count should always be made in the presence of the custodian of each of the funds, and
he or she should be asked to sign a receipt for the return of cash after the count has been
completed.
~ 10 ~
7. Analyze bank transfers for the last week of audit year and first week of following year
Embezzlers occasionally cover a theft of cash by a practice known as kiting: transferring money
from one bank to another and incorrectly recording the transaction. The purpose of analyzing
bank transfer is to disclose overstatement of cash balances resulting from kiting. Kiting is a
fraudulent scheme that seeks to take advantage of "float".
Float: Is in the banking system. It refers to the timing difference between the day a check is
credited to an account in one bank, and the debited to an account in another bank. For example,
today you deposit a check, drawn on CBE - Addis Ababa branch, into Dashen Bank Mekelle
branch. Dashen bank - Mekelle branch will credit your account today. But the check will not
reach CBE - Addis Ababa branch, to be deducted from the drawer's account until a few days
later. This is the float time.
Kiting is transferring money from one bank to another and improperly recording the transaction.
Near the balance sheet date, a check is drawn on one bank account and immediately deposited in
a second bank account for credit before the end of the accounting period. In making this transfer
the embezzler is careful to make sure that the check is deposited at a late enough date so that it
does not clear the first bank until after the balance sheet date, the amount of the transfer is
recorded as an asset in both bank account.
Both theft and management fraud may be carried out with kiting. Note that kiting is possible
only in the case of weak internal control. For example, lack of proper segregation of duties,
collusion, or management override.
Example of Kiting
Assume Tirf Trading House has two bank accounts. One in Dashen Bank, and one in
Commercial Bank of Ethiopia. And the following scenarios happen in Tirf Training.
Kiting to cover Theft. Account clerk Mr. Atalay "borrows" incoming cash receipt (skimming)
of 1,000 Birr. However, he needs to post amounts to individual customer accounts in the A/R
subsidiary ledger. Otherwise, they will complain and his theft will be discovered. So he makes a
journal entry.
Then Mr. Atalay realizes that this incorrect entry will be discovered when the bank account is
reconciled. So on the last day of the fiscal year, he writes a check on the CBE account for 1,000
Birr, and deposits it into Dashen Bank. But no entry will be made to decrease CBE. CBE do not
know it as disbursement. The bank reconciliation will now balance, because CBE will not debit
~ 11 ~
the check until the next fiscal year. Mr. Atalay assumes that by then, his "chigger" will have
ended and he will be able to pay back the "loan".
W/ro Akeza is managing director of Tirf Trading. She has applied for a business loan. Tirf
Trading is having a difficult year, and needs the money very badly to pay suppliers and payroll.
She know too well the fundamental principle of banking. So she has to convince Wegagen Bank
that Tirf Trading is having a good year. She decides to do this by overstating the current ratio on
the financial statements, because she knows this is a key area for the loan officer's analysis.
On the last day of the fiscal year, she draws a check for 300,000 Birr from CBE and deposits it to
Dashen Bank. She gives the stamped deposit ticket to the accountant with the instructions to
make this entry on December.
CBE of course, will not process the check until next year, and it will not show up on the bank
reconciliation until January 31. By that time, W/ro Akeza hopes the loan will have been granted,
and a simple correcting journal entry can be made to correct the ledger balance for Cash in Bank
- Dashen.
The audit test to discover kiting is to prepare and examine a schedule of interbank there are
several things that should be audited on the interbank transfer schedule.
1. The accuracy of the information on the interbank transfer schedule should be verified.
2. The interbank transfer must be recorded in both the receiving and disbursing banks. If
10,000 is transferred from bank A to B but only disbursement (in A) is reduced, this is an
evidence of an attempt to conceal a cash theft (kitting)
3. The date of recording of the disbursement and receipts for each transfer must be in the
same year. If a cash receipt was recorded in the current fiscal year and disbursement in
the subsequent FY, it may be an attempt to cover cash shortage.
4. Disbursements on the interbank transfer schedule should be correctly included in or
excluded from year - end bank reconciliation as outstanding checks. An outstanding
check (CK) for the first bank is an outstanding deposit for the second bank.
Understanding outstanding CKs on the bank reconciliation indicates the possibility of
kiting. The dates in disbursement books and dates of disbursement in bank must be in the
same year. If there are CKs recorded in book but not in bank, they must be included as
~ 12 ~
outstanding CKs in the preparation of bank reconciliation. But if there are some CKs
that are not included as outstanding CKs, this is an indication of kiting.
5. Receipts on the interbank transfer schedule should be correctly included or excluded from
year - end bank reconciliations as deposit in transit. Compare receipt dates as per book
and per bank. Any deposit recorded in book but not in bank should be reflected as
outstanding deposit in bank reconciliation. But if there are receipts recorded as
outstanding deposits whose amount is not recorded in cash receipt journal, it is an
indication of kiting.
Date of Date of
Disbursement
Bank Account Receipt
Check No. From To Amount Books Bank Books Bank
12 1 12 12
5897 General Payroll $30,620 /28 /3 /28 /28
12 12
6006 General Branch 4 24,018 ½ ¼ /30 /30
1 1 1 12
6029 Branch 2 General 10,000 /3 /5 /3 /31
Disclosure of Kiting: By comparing the dates on the schedule of bank transfers, auditors can
determine whether any manipulation of the cash balance has taken place. The increase in one
bank account and decrease in the other bank account should be recorded in the cash journals in
the same accounting period. Notice that Check No. 6006 in the transfer schedule was recorded
in the cash journals as a receipt on December 30 and a disbursement of January 2. As a result of
recording the debit and credit parts of the transaction in different accounting periods, cash is
overstated on December 31. For the cash receipts journal to remain in balance, some account
must have been credited on December 30 to offset the debit to Cash. If a revenue account was
credited, the results of operations were overstated along with cash.
A bank transfer schedule should disclose this type of kiting because the transfer deposit appears
on the general account bank statement in December, while the transaction was not recorded in
the cash journals until January. Check No. 6029 in the transfers schedule illustrates this
discrepancy. These illustrations suggest the following rules for determining when it is likely that
a cash transfer has misstated the cash balance:
1. The dates of recording the transfer per the books (from the cash disbursements and cash
receipts journals, respectively) are from different statement period, or
~ 13 ~
2. The date the check was recorded by the bank (either the disbursement or the receipt, but not
both) is from the financial statement period prior to when it is recorded on the books.
Proof of cash
~ 14 ~
Another substantive test auditors perform is preparing a proof of cash to verify completeness of
cash balance.
When auditors decide that the risk associated with a client’s control procedures related to
recoding cash receipts and disbursements is high, they frequently prepare a proof of cash, also
known as a four – column bank reconciliation. A proof of cash reconciles the following:
Beginning and ending cash balances per the bank statement with cash balances per the
general ledger.
Cash receipts as recorded by the bank with cash receipts recorded in the cash receipts
journal.
Cash disbursements as recorded by the bank with cash disbursements recorded in the
cash disbursements journal.
A proof of cash can be performed for one month, several months, or an entire year. The
advantage of a proof of cash over standard bank reconciliation is that a proof of cash provides
evidence that the cash receipts and disbursements that the bank has recorded are recorded on the
client’s books. It does not provide any other evidence about cash receipts or disbursements, such
as that all cash received was deposited or that checks were written only for approved purposes.
Proof of cash receipts is not useful for uncovering the theft of cash receipt or the recording and
deposit of an improper amount of cash.
2.6 Audit of Marketable securities
2.6.1 Definition of marketable Securities
Marketable securities (Short-term investments) are financial investments which are convertible
into cash within one year or one operating cycle. They are listed at their current market value.
Marketable Securities are shown on the balance sheet as “Short-term Investments”.
E.g. Commercial paper, marketable equity securities, and marketable debt securities