Equations of Motion, Momentum and Energy For Deformable Solids
Equations of Motion, Momentum and Energy For Deformable Solids
Equations of Motion, Momentum and Energy For Deformable Solids
Chapter 6
6.1 Linear and angular momentum balance equations for a deformable solid
Deformable solids are governed by the same physical laws (Newton’s laws) as a system of particles. You will
hopefully recall that, for a particle system in which particles can only interact by exerting forces on one another
(and cannot exert moments on one another):
1. The net external force acting on the system is equal to the time derivative of the total linear
momentum of the system
2. The total external moment acting on the system is equal to the rate of change of its total angular
momentum
3. The rate of work done by external forces is equal to the sum of the rate of change of kinetic energy of
the system and the rate of work done by internal forces.
A deformable solid can be thought of as an infinite number of infinitesimal particles. For a system of this
kind, the balance laws can be re-written as a set of partial differential equations, as outlined in the sections to
follow.
Derivation: Recall that the resultant force acting on an arbitrary volume of material V within a solid is
Pi = ∫ Ti (n)dA+ ∫ ρ bi dV
A V
where T(n) is the internal traction acting on the surface A with normal n that bounds V.
Conservation of angular momentum for a continuum requires that the Cauchy stress satisfy
σji = σij
i.e. the stress tensor must be symmetric.
Derivation: write down the equation for balance of angular momentum for the region V within the deformed
solid
⎧
⎪ ⎫
⎪
∫ y × T dA + ∫ y × ρ bdV = ⎨∫
dt ⎩
y × ρ vdV ⎬
⎭
d
⎪ ⎪
A V V
Here, the left hand side is the resultant moment (about the origin) exerted by tractions and body forces acting
on a general region within a solid. The right hand side is the total angular momentum of the solid about the
origin.
To derive these results, you can start with the integral form of the linear momentum balance in terms of
Cauchy stress
⎧
⎪ ⎫
⎪
∫ σji nj dA+ ∫ ρ bi dV = ⎨∫
dt ⎩
ρ vi dV ⎬
⎭
d
⎪ ⎪
A V V
Recall (or see Appendix D for a reminder) that area elements in the deformed and undeformed solids are
related through
dAni = J Fki−1 n0k dA0
In addition, volume elements are related by dV = JdV0 . We can use these results to re-write the integrals as
integrals over a volume in the undeformed solid as
⎧
⎪ ⎫
⎪
∫ σji J Fkj−1 n0k dA0 + ∫ ρ bi JdV0 = ⎨∫
dt ⎩
ρ vi JdV0 ⎬
⎭
d
⎪ ⎪
A0 V0 V0
Finally, recall that Sij = J Fik−1 σkj and that Jρ = ρ0 to see that
⎧
⎪ ⎫
⎪
∫ S ki n0k dA0 + ∫ ρ 0 bi dV0 = ⎨∫
dt ⎩
ρ 0 vi d V 0 ⎬
⎭
d
⎪ ⎪
A0 V0 V0
Apply the divergence theorem to the first term and rearrange
∂Sji
∫ ( ) d V0 = 0
dvi
+ ρ0 bi − ρ0
∂xj dt
V
Once again, since this must hold for any material volume, we conclude that
Sij
∂xi
+ ρ0 bj = ρ0 aj
The linear momentum balance equation in terms of material stress follows directly, by substituting into this
equation for Sij in terms of Σij
The angular momentum balance equation can be derived simply by substituting into the momentum balance
equation in terms of Cauchy stress σij = σji
The general equations of motion for a deformable solid are hard to solve,
because the shape of the solid must be calculated as part of the solution.
In many engineering applications, the deformation is small enough to be
neglected. If this is the case, we can simplify the calculations as follows
1. We neglect the differences between the various stress measures
described in Section 6.1.3.
2. We neglect the difference between the density of the deformed and
undeformed solid
3. We satisfy the equations of motion (or equilibrium) on the undeformed
solid, instead of the deformed solid.
Accordingly, let xi denote the position of a material particle in the undeformed solid, and let ρ0 denote the
mass density of the undeformed material. Assume that the solid is subjected to a body force b per unit
mass. Newton’s third law of motion (F=ma) can be expressed as
∂σij
∇ ⋅ σ + ρ0 b = ρ0 a or ∂ x + ρ0 bj = ρ0 aj
i
Written out in full
∂σ11 ∂σ21 ∂σ31
∂x1
+ ∂x2
+ ∂x3
+ ρ0 b1 = ρ0 a1
∂σ12 ∂σ22 ∂σ32
∂x1
+ ∂x2
+ ∂x3
+ ρ0 b2 = ρ0 a2
∂σ13 ∂σ23 ∂σ33
∂x1
+ ∂x2
+ ∂x3
+ ρ0 b3 = ρ0 a3
For the special (but rather common) case of a solid in static equilibrium in the absence of body forces
∂σij
∂xi
=0
( )
∂σij 3Pk δi k yi yj yk δii yj yk yi δij yk yi yj yi
∂yi
=− 4π
+ + −5 =0
R5 R5 R5 R6 R
(b) Consider a spherical region of material centered at the origin. This region is subjected to (1) the body
force acting at the origin; and (2) a force exerted by the stress field on the outer surface of the sphere.
Calculate the resultant force exerted on the outer surface of the sphere by the stress, and show that it is
equal in magnitude and opposite in direction to the body force.
The traction acting on the exterior surface is ti = σij ni and a unit vector normal vector to a sphere radius
R centered at the origin is ni = yi /R. The resultant force is thus
yk yj
Fj = −3
P
4π k
∫ dA
R3
S
The integral clearly vanishes for k ≠ j by symmetry. Choosing k=j=3 without loss of generality we can
evaluate the remaining integral in spherical-polar coordinates as
2π π
(R cos θ)2 2
F3 = −3
P
4π 3
∫ ∫ R sin θdθdϕ = −P3
R3
0 0
Example Let ϕ be a twice differentiable, scalar function of position. Derive a plane stress field from
ϕ by setting
∂2 ϕ ∂2 ϕ ∂2 ϕ
σ11 = σ22 = σ12 = σ21 = − ∂y
∂y22 ∂y12 1 ∂y2
Show that this stress field satisfies the equations of stress equilibrium with zero body force.
The body force (per unit mass) is b = −ge2 . For this case, the equilibrium equations (written out in
full) are
∂σ11 ∂σ21 ∂σ31
∂y1
+ ∂y2
+ ∂y3
=0
∂σ12 ∂σ22 ∂σ32
∂y1
+ ∂y2
+ ∂y3
− ρg = 0
∂σ13 ∂σ23 ∂σ33
∂y1
+ ∂y2
+ ∂y3
=0
The first and last equatinos are satisfied automatically, and substituting for the stress into the second
and evaluating the derivative shows that that, too, is satisfied.
On the sides of the column, the normal vectors point in the ±e1 , ±e2 directions. Since
σ1i = 0, σ3i = 0, σ12 = σ32 = 0 it follows that nj σji = 0 on the sides. The stress is zero at
x2 = H , so the tractions on the top face are also zero.
The rate of work done by Cauchy stresses per unit deformed volume is then σij Dij . This energy is either
dissipated as heat or stored as internal energy in the solid, depending on the material behavior.
We shall show that the rate of work done by internal forces acting on any sub-volume V bounded by a surface
A in the deformed solid can be calculated from
⎧
⎪ ⎫
⎪
⎨∫ ρvi vi dV ⎬
1
ṙ = ∫ Ti vi dA + ∫ ρbi vi dV = ∫ σij Dij dV +
(n)
dt ⎩ ⎭
d
⎪ 2 ⎪
A V V V
Here, the two terms on the left hand side represent the rate of work done by tractions and body forces acting
on the solid (work done = force x velocity). The first term on the right-hand side can be interpreted as the work
done by Cauchy stresses; the second term is the rate of change of kinetic energy.
(n)
Derivation: Substitute for Ti in terms of Cauchy stress to see that
⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞
dt ⎜
ρ0 (vi vi ) dV0 ⎟ = dt ⎜
ρ0 (vi vi ) dV0 ⎟ =
1 1 1
= d
∫ d
∫ d
∫ ρ (vi vi ) dV
⎝V 2 ⎠ ⎝V 2 ⎠ 2
dt
0 0 V
Finally, substitution leads to
⎧
⎪ ⎫
⎪
⎨∫ ρvi vi dV ⎬
1
ṙ = ∫ Ti vi dA + ∫ ρbi vi dV = ∫ σij Dij dV +
(n)
dt ⎩ ⎭
d
⎪ 2 ⎪
A V V V
as required.
The rate of work done per unit undeformed volume by Kirchhoff stress is τij Dij
The rate of work done per unit undeformed volume by Nominal stress is Sij F˙ji
The rate of work done per unit undeformed volume by Material stress is Σij Ė ij
This shows that nominal stress and deformation gradient are work conjugate, as are material stress and
Lagrange strain.
In addition, the rate of work done on a volume V0 of the undeformed solid can be expressed as
⎧
⎪ ⎫
⎪
⎨∫ ρ0 vi vi dV0 ⎬
1
ṙ = ∫ + ∫ ρbi vi dV = ∫ τij Dij dV0 +
(n)
⎩ ⎭
d
⎪ ⎪
Ti vi dA dt 2
⎧ ⎫
A V V0 V0
⎪ ⎪
ṙ = ∫ Ti vi dA + ∫ ρbi vi dV = ∫ Sij F˙ji dV0 + dtd ⎨∫ ρ0 vi vi dV0 ⎬
(n) 1
⎩
⎪ 2 ⎭
⎪
⎧ ⎫
A V V0 V0
⎪ 1 ⎪
ṙ = ∫ Ti vi dA + ∫ ρbi vi dV = ∫ Σij Ėij dV0 + dt ⎨∫ ρ0 vi vi dV0 ⎬
(n)
⎩ 2 ⎭
d
⎪ ⎪
A V V0 V0
Derivations: The proof of the first result (and the stress power of Kirchhoff stress) is straightforward and is left
(n)
as an exercise. To show the second result, note that Ti dA = n0j Sji dA0 and dV = JdV0 to re-write the
integrals over the undeformed solid; then and apply the divergence theorem to see that
∂
ṙ = ∫ (Sji vi ) dV0 + ∫ ρbi vi JdV0
∂xj
V0 V0
Evaluate the derivative, recall that Jρ = ρ0 and use the equation of motion
Sij dvj
∂xi
+ ρ0 bj = ρ0 dt
to see that
∂vi dvi
ṙ = ∫ Sji dV0 + ∫ ρ0 vi d V 0
∂xj dt
V0 V0
Finally, note that ∂vi /∂xj = (∂u̇i /∂xj ) = F˙ij and re-write the second integral as a kinetic energy term as
before to obtain the required result.
The third result follows by straightforward algebraic manipulations – note that by definition
Sij F˙ji = Σik Fjk F˙ji
Since Σij is symmetric it follows that
Σik Fjk F˙ji = 12 (Σik + Σki ) Fjk F˙ji = Σik 12 (Fjk F˙ji + Fji F˙jk ) = Σik Ėik
For infintesimal motions all stress measures are equal; and all strain rate measures can be approximated by
the infinitesimal strain tensor ε. The rate of work done by stresses per unit volume of either deformed or
undeformed solid (the difference is neglected) can be expressed as σij ε̇ ij , and the work done on a volume
V0 of the solid is
⎧
⎪ ⎫
⎪
⎨∫ ρ0 vi vi dV0 ⎬
1
ṙ = ∫ + ∫ ρbi vi dV = ∫ σij ε̇ ij dV0 +
(n)
⎩ ⎭
d
⎪ ⎪
Ti vi dA dt 2
A V V0 V0
The principle of virtual work is an alternative way of expressing the equations of motion and equilibrium
derived in Section 6.1. At first sight it appears to be fairly useless, but it turns out to be an extremely useful
way of deriving equilibrium equations or equations of motion for a solid in which the deformation is
approximated in some way – for example, in a beam, plate or shell. In addition, the principle of virtual work is
also used as the starting point for finite element analysis for nonlinear solids, and so is a particularly important
result.
Some definitions are needed before the principle
can be stated. Suppose that a deformable solid is
subjected to loading that induces a displacement
field u(x), and a velocity field v(x) . The loading
consists of a prescribed displacement on part of
the boundary (denoted by S1 ), together with a
traction t (which may be zero in places) applied to
the rest of the boundary (denoted by S2 ). The
loading induces a Cauchy stress σij . The stress
field satisfies the angular momentum balance
equation σij = σji .
The principle of virtual work is a different way of re-writing partial differential equation for linear moment
balance
∂σji dvi
∂yj
+ ρbi = ρ dt
in an equivalent integral form, which is much better suited for computer solution.
To express the principle, we define a kinematically admissible virtual velocity field δv(y) , satisfying
δv = 0 on S1 . You can visualize this field as a small change in the velocity of the solid, if you like, but it is
really just an arbitrary differentiable vector field. The term `kinematically admissible’ is just a complicated way
of saying that the field is continuous, differentiable, and satisfies δv = 0 on S1 - that is to say, if you perturb
the velocity by δv(y) , the boundary conditions on displacement are still satisfied.
In addition, we define an associated virtual velocity gradient, and virtual stretch rate as
δDij = 12 ( )
∂δvi ∂δvi ∂δvj
δLij = ∂yj ∂yj
+ ∂yi
The first is not very interesting, but we will state it anyway. Suppose that the Cauchy stress satisfies:
1. The boundary condition ni σij = tj on S2
2. The linear momentum balance equation
∂σji dvi
∂yj
+ ρbi = ρ dt
Then the virtual work equation
dv
∫ σ : δDdV + ∫ ρ ⋅ δvdV − ∫ ρb ⋅ δvdV − ∫ t ⋅ δvdA = 0
dt
V V V S
Or equivalently, with index notation
dvi
∫ σij δDij dV + ∫ ρ δvi dV − ∫ ρbi δvi dV − ∫ ti δvi dA = 0
dt
V V V S2
is satisfied for all virtual velocity fields.
The converse of this statement is much more interesting and useful. Suppose that σij satisfies the virtual
work equation
dv
∫ σ : δDdV + ∫ ρ ⋅ δvdV − ∫ ρb ⋅ δvdV − ∫ t ⋅ δvdA = 0
dt
V V V S
Or, using index notation
dvi
∫ σij δDij dV + ∫ ρ δvi dV − ∫ ρbi δvi dV − ∫ ti δvi dA = 0
dt
V V V S2
for all virtual velocity fields δv(y) . Then the stress field must satisfy
3. The boundary condition ni σij = tj on S2
4. The linear momentum balance equation
∂σji dvi
∂yj
+ ρbi = ρ dt
The significance of this result is that it gives us an alternative way to solve for a stress field that satisfies the
linear momentum balance equation, which avoids having to differentiate the stress. It is not easy to
differentiate functions accurately in the computer, but it is easy to integrate them. The virtual work statement
is the starting point for any finite element solution involving deformable solids.
+ ∫ (σji nj − ti ) (σki nk − ti ) dA = 0
S2
Again, the integrand is positive everywhere (it is a perfect square) and so can vanish only if
σji nj = ti
as stated.
It is often convenient to implement the virtual work equation in a finite element code using different stress
measures.
To do so, we define
∂ui
1. The actual deformation gradient in the solid Fij = δij + ∂xj
2. The virtual rate of change of deformation gradient δF˙ij =
∂δvi ∂δv
F = ∂x i
∂yk kj j
3. The virtual rate of change of Lagrange strain δĖ ij = 2 (Fki δF˙kj + δF˙ki Fkj )
1
For infintesimal motions, the Cauchy, Nominal, and Material stress tensors are equal; and the virtual stretch
rate can be replaced by the virtual infinitesimal strain rate
δε̇ ij = 12 ( ∂x i + )
∂δv ∂δvj
j ∂xi
There is no need to distinguish between the volume or surface area of the deformed and undeformed solid.
The virtual work equation can thus be expressed as
dvi
∫ σij δε̇ ij dV0 + ∫ ρ0 δvi dV0 − ∫ ρ0 bi δvi dV0 − ∫ ti δvi dA0 = 0
dt
V0 V0 V0 S2
for all kinematically admissible velocity fields.
As a special case, this expression can be applied to a quasi-static state with vi = 0. Then, for a stress state
σij satisfying the static equilibrium equation σij /dxi + ρ0 bj = 0 and boundary conditions σij nj = ti on
S2 , the virtual work equation reduces to
∫ σij δεij dV0 = ∫ ρ0 bi δui dV0 + ∫ ti δui dA
V0 V0 S2
In which δui are kinematically admissible displacements components (δui = 0 on S2) and
δεij = (∂δui /xj + ∂δuj /xi ) /2 .
Conversely, if the stress state σij satisfies ∫ σij δεij dV0 = ∫ ρ0 bi δui dV0 + ∫ ti δui dA for every set of
V0 V0 S2
kinematically admissible virtual displacements, then the stress state σij satisfies the static equilibrium
equation σij /dxi + ρ0 bj = 0 and boundary conditions σij nj = ti on S2 .
Example: The shell shown in the figure is subjected to a radial body force
b = ρb(R)eR , and a radial pressure pa , pb acting on the surfaces at
R = a and R = b. The loading induces a spherically symmetric state of
stress in the shell, which can be expressed in terms of its components in a
spherical-polar coordinate system as
σRR eR ⊗ eR + σθθ eθ ⊗ eθ + σϕϕ eϕ ⊗ eϕ (or if you prefer matrix
notation
⎡ σRR 0 0 ⎤
σ = ⎢ 0 σθθ 0 ⎥
⎣ 0 0 σϕϕ ⎦
(a) By considering a virtual velocity of the form δv = w(R)eR , (i.e. all points in the sphere can only move in
the radial direction, but they can move by an arbitrary displacement) show that the stress state is in static
equilibrium if
b b
The principle of virtual work will usually magically give you a simplified form of the general equilibrium
equation for any simplified kind of deformation. There is a standard process to follow, which involves two
steps: (i) substitute a virtual displacement field that has the same form as the simplified kind of motion;
and then (usually) (ii) integrate the virtual work equation by parts to remove any derivatives of the
displacement field.
We will use this method here. To evaluate the virtual work equation, we must first calculate the virtual
stretch rate δD . By definition D = {∇v + (∇v)T } /2 . We can use the formula from Section 3.5.8 to
calculate the gradient in spherical polar coordinates
⎡ ⎤
∂vR 1 ∂vR ∂vR vϕ
⎡ dR 0⎤
vθ 1
− −
⎢ ⎥
dw
∂R R ∂θ R R sin θ ∂ϕ R 0
∇v ≡ ⎢
⎢ ⎥
⎥ =⎢
⎢ 0 0⎥⎥
∂vθ 1 ∂vθ ∂vθ
⎢ ⎥
vR 1 vϕ
+ − cot θ R w
⎢ ⎥ ⎣ w ⎦
∂R R ∂θ R R sin θ ∂ϕ R
⎣ ⎦ 0 0
∂vϕ 1 ∂vϕ 1 ∂vϕ v vR
∂R R ∂θ R sin θ ∂ϕ
+ cot θ Rθ + R
R
The remaining terms in the virtual work equation are standard dot products, and the volume integral can be
re-written as an integral with respect to the radial coordinate R, so the virtual work principle therefore
reduces to
∫ σ : δDdV − ∫ ρb ⋅ δvdV − ∫ t∗ ⋅ δvdA =
V V S
b b
In this form, the equation does not tell us anything interesting. However, if we integrate the first term
by parts, we can re-write the virtual work equation as
b
1 d(R2 σRR ) 1
∫ { + (σθθ + σϕϕ ) − b(R)} w4πR2 dR
R2 dR R
a
−4πa2 (σRR (a) + pa )w(a) + 4πb2 (σRR (b) + pb )w(b) = 0
This must vanish for all w. Since this includes any w with w=0 at R=a,R=B, it follows that
b
1 d(R2 σRR ) 1
∫ { 2
+ (σθθ + σϕϕ ) − b(R)} w4πR2 dR = 0
R dR R
a
This must vanish even if we happen to pick
2
1 d(R σRR ) 1
w= + (σθθ + σϕϕ ) − b(R)
R2 dR R
which requires that
b 2
1 d(R2 σRR ) 1
∫ { + (σθθ + σϕϕ ) − b(R)} 4πR2 dR = 0
R2 dR R
a
The integrand is now positive or zero everywhere, so the integral can only be zero if the integrand is
zero. Therefore
dσRR 1
dR
+ R
(2σRR − σθθ − σϕϕ ) + b = 0
Since the integrand vanishes, we now are left with
−4πa2 (σRR (a) + pa )w(a) + 4πb2 (σRR (b) + pb )w(b) = 0
Again, this condition must be satisfied for all w, which is only possible if
σRR = −pa (R = a) σRR = −pb (R = b)