Constructivist Learning Paradigm As The Basis On Learning Model Development
Constructivist Learning Paradigm As The Basis On Learning Model Development
Constructivist Learning Paradigm As The Basis On Learning Model Development
Constructivist Learning
Paradigm as the Basis on Learning Model Development. Journal of Education and
Learning. Vol. 409 (4) pp. 410-415. DOI: 10.11591/edulearn.v11i4.6852
Abstract
Research on knowledge quality development has been rapidly developed in these several decades, especially to
those related to the use of methods in learning. Of the findings, only did few research articles report about the
application of constructivist-learning paradigm in the frame of learning process and the model of learning
possibly used as the reference to improve the quality of knowledge. This paper aims at discussing the potentials
owned by constructivist learning paradigm and trying to put it into a model of learning as an endeavour of
improving the quality of knowledge. With regard to the result, it appears that properly using the constructivist-
learning paradigm will stimulate the creation of good and competitive academic learning environment, active
learning participation, and stimulate education that encourages students to be responsible for their learning where
it finally ends in a positive development of knowledge.
* Kurniawan Yudhi Nugroho., S.Pd., M.Pd, Sultan Agung Islamic University, English Education
Study Program, Jl. Raya Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang Central Java, Indonesia.
E-mail: kurniawan@unissula.ac.id
**
Diyah Fitri Wulandari., S.S., M.Hum, Sultan Agung Islamic University, English Literature Study
Program, Jl. Raya Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang Central Java, Indonesia.
E-mail: diyahfitri@unissula.ac.id
Received July 7, 2017; Revised September 23, 2017; Accepted October 9, 2017
Introduction
To produce, excellent, independent and competitive graduate, education institution needs to
consider about sustainably keeping the professionalism of their teachers. It is undeniable that the role of
teachers within the context of learning is vividly irreplaceable. Teachers are the ones who deal a lot
with their students. They see the progress of their students. They notice the strengths and weaknesses of
their learners and they are the ones who must initiate action to perfect the shortages their students have
for sake of learning development (Ferhat, 2016). Responding to the current trend in education, the role
of teachers has now shifted from the teachers as the centre for learning to the students as the center for
learning. Teachers are recently demanded to act more as a motivator and facilitator rather than to be as
the primary source of information. Becoming facilitator, teachers help facilitate their students to meet
the learning target, to learn independently and to find out solution upon the challenges they face within
their learning context. While taking the role as a motivator, teachers here are supposed to encourage
their learners to persistently maintain their learning eagerness through personal approach and
meaningful learning activities.
Teachers have the authority to select methods used for teaching (Nugroho, 2013). In relation to
meeting the learning aim, placing a great endeavour to select the most suitable approach for teaching by
looking at the input of the learners and the result of learning evaluation is urgently required. Learners
are the object of teaching, while at the same time they become the subject to achieve the essence of
education. With respect to this, the necessity to design a learning model supportive to the student
centered learning activities is worth to strive. However, it is observable that lecture method becomes the
most dominantly used teaching method in this recent world, particularly Indonesia and this might be
suspected to be one of the common factors to contribute less optimum result in meeting the education
aims. Teacher centered approach suggests that teachers be the center of learning, they will act as the
primary source of information. As the result, it is possible that the students will rely themselves a lot on
the teachers and what makes them become dependent learners. In the context of knowledge
development within the frame of modern education, teacher centered approach will probably not be on
top priority to select for it is perceived to provide students with less exposure upon the competence they
are required to develop. This paper presents how the concept of constructivist learning approach may
contribute to creation of active learning environment, active learning participation and learning
responsibility, eventually expected to affect learners’ knowledge quality development.
Kurniawan Nugroho, D.Wulandari. (2017). Journal of Education and Learning. Vol. 11 (4) pp. 410-415.411
expose them with different meaningful ideas for sake of making deep conceptual understanding (Weller
2002; Porcaro, 2011).
The concept proposed by constructivist approach may help build learning culture within the
learning community. It values the intellectual engagement, meta-cognition and co-construction as well
as students’ participation and ownership of learning, yet, the active involvement of teachers is mainly
needed to renegotiate roles, relationship and responsibilities to optimize students’ participation and
ownership of learning for the benefit of accelerating re-culturing process (Cornu, Peters, & Collins,
2003). This process is expected to create a desired learning environment that supports collaborative
construction of knowledge, ideas, reflection as well as positive reinforcement and coaching from
teacher to aid development and understanding in an active and supported learning activity. Through the
exposure towards academic content, experiences and learning setting, learners may inductively
construct and broaden their own knowledge (Ahston-Hay, 2006). Active learning, meaningful and
enjoyable learning context as well as teachers behavior for the learners will have impact on students’
learning (Akar, 2003). Social interaction is the nature of constructivist learning practices. When active
learning situation is created to promote meaningful sharing and discussion for sake of decision making
and problem solving under complex circumstances, it is undeniable that the classroom becomes noisy
(Dunlop & Grabinger, 1996; Marlowe & Page, 1998). Teachers are not to share what to do and to know,
instead, they need to let them explore about real learning environment (Dunlop & Grabinger, 1996).
They further suggest that the job of the teachers are only to help learners understand the content and
issues from different perspectives and let those comments upon their finding. Revisiting the
implementation of constructivist learning practices, discussion becomes the mostly used method in the
classroom, as it is believed to assists learners to get better in touch with the subject matter, understand
the academic content and promote the verbal interaction that allows the learners to learn how to conduct
discussion in an effective way (Larson, 2000). Critical thinking, problem solving and reflective writing
can possibly be applied in the discussion (Akar, 2003). The references help define the essence of
constructivism as a learning theory. Learning is seen as a change of meaning built through experience
derived from social-cultural exposure (Dougiamas, 1998; Tam, 1999).
Learners are an active knowledge constructor, they build their own tentative knowledge
through collaboration, reflection and making use of their personal experience (Kelly, 1955, 1963;
Jordan, 2013). Although, there have been various ideas raising upon the way of bringing constructivist
learning theories in practices. However, they all agree that learners are the center of learning and ones
need to develop. Educational program needs to be set in such a way to help them better grow. Providing
them with meaningful and enjoyable learning environment where it also enables them to develop their
critical thinking, ability to solve problem and ability to write reflectively is one of the most considerable
proposals. Teachers are not the center of learning, rather, they should be a motivator while at the same
time become a facilitator. Their job is to motivate and provide learners with best learning environment
that allows them to achieve the goal of learning. Teachers are no longer the source of information.
Learners are encouraged to find out their own learning resources to answer the addressed issues, and
teachers in this case are supposed to run their function to monitor their learners’ progress of learning
and help them whenever possible to deal with the learning issue. Internet is one of many available
resources learners may use. Being engaged in using this kind of technology will help create a different
learning environment.
Conclusions
The theories of constructivism are all about paradigm believes that learning is an active
constructive process that takes place in a socio-cultural circumstance. Learners are designed to be active
to create a change in meaning through real activities. When it is applied accordingly by considering the
principles of constructivism, the concept may help learner effectively improve their ability to critically
Kurniawan Nugroho, D.Wulandari. (2017). Journal of Education and Learning. Vol. 11 (4) pp. 410-415.413
think, to solve problem and to write reflectively through predesigned interactive pedagogical practices.
These practices will put an endeavor to meet the essence of education through providing quality
education. Bringing constructivism as a learning theory into practice is not just a matter of realizing the
perspective. It must go farer than it is to meet the desired goals of learning. This construct is a powerful
learning paradigm, which allows skill and cognitive development for learners. This concept endorses
that learners be the center for learning and this makes role of the teachers change from the traditional
concept of learning into the recent one. Within the framework of constructivist learning, teachers are as
a learning designer, facilitator and learners’ motivator. Their active involvement is essential to
renegotiate roles, relationship and responsibilities to improve learners’ participation and ownership of
learning. Previous researches suggest that working properly towards materializing this concept into
practice is proven to create active learning environment, learners’ active participation and learners’
learning responsibility that eventually influence the learners’ view of the world and their quality of skill
as well as academic knowledge.
Acknowledgement
The authors are grateful for the financial support provided by Indonesia Ministry of Research,
Technology and Higher Education upon the early implementation of this project. Our sincere gratitude
is also extended to those who have helped us with discussion and proofreading the concept of the
proposed research.
References
Ahston-Hay, S. (2006). Constructivism and Powerful Learning Environments. 9th International English
Language Teaching Convention “The Fusion of Theory and Practice”222. Retrieved from
http://eprints.qut.edu.au/17285/1/17285.pdf
Akar, H. (2003). Impact of Constructivist Learning Process on Preservice Teacher Education Students’
Performance, Retention and Attitudes, (December), 1–286. Retrieved from
https://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/3/1102136/index.pdf
Cornu, R. Le, Peters, J., & Collins, J. (2003). What Are The Characteristics of Constructivist Learning
Cultures ?, 44(0).
Dougiamas, M. (1998). A journey into constructivism. Retrieved August 13, 2001, from
http://dougiamas.com/writing/constructivism.htlm.
Dunlop, J.C., & Grabinger, R.S. (1996). Rich environments for the active learning in higher education.
In G. B. Wilson (Ed.), Constructing learning environments: Case studies in Instructional
design (pp. 65-82). Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.
Ferhat, Y. (2016). An Institutional Perspective into Professional Development of English Teachers : A
Case of Schools of Foreign Languages, 232(April), 828–832.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.112
Jones, M. G., & Brader-Araje, L. (2002). The Impact of Constructivism in Education, Discourse and
Maeaning. American Communication Journal, 5(3), 1–10. Retrieved from http://ac-
journal.org/journal/vol5/iss3/special/jones.pdf
Jordan, C. (2013). Comparison of International Baccalaureate (IB) chemistry students’ preferred vs
actual experience with a constructivist style of learning in a Moodle e‐learning environment.
International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 2(2), 155–167.
https://doi.org/10.1108/20468251311323397
Kelly, G. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs: Volumes one and two. Norton. New York,
NY.
Kelly, G. (1963), A Theory of Personality, Norton, New York, NY.
Larson, B. E. (2000). Classroom discussion: A method of instruction and a curriculum outcome.
Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 661-677.
Marlowe, A. B., & Page, L. M. (1998). Creating and sustaining the constructivist classroom. California:
Corwin Press.
Mingazova. (2014). Modification of the Active Learning Methods in Environmental Education in
Russian Universities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 131, 85–89.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.083
Mitchell, H., & Myles, F. (1988). Second language learning theories. London: Arnold.
Kurniawan Nugroho, D.Wulandari. (2017). Journal of Education and Learning. Vol. 11 (4) pp. 410-415.415