Paper Endodoncia Bla
Paper Endodoncia Bla
Paper Endodoncia Bla
238
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t46..&3
MEYENBERG
Moderator/Editor’s Introduction
One of the most challenging dilemmas for the younger patient, then why can’t
faced by today’s clinician is the manage- it be done for the older patient? On the
ment of the structurally and esthetically other hand, perhaps it is more predict-
compromised endodontically treated able in a given case to remove the tooth
tooth. Certainly, in recent years there has and restore it with a dental implant res-
been a tendency to take the simplified toration. These and other issues are real
approach of “extraction and implant” concerns we have as practitioners and it
but this does not always prove to be as is important to have objective as well as
simple as we would like to think. Has the subjective criteria on which to base
the popularity of dental implantology our decision for the choice of restorative
made the restorative dentist complacent protocol.
in regards to the possibilities that good Are all endodontically treated teeth
endodontic, periodontal and restorative really less predictable than a dental
treatments can achieve? Without doubt implant-supported restoration? Are they
the dental implant option has its place, really more likely to fail? Do they really
and rightly so, but in many cases, I sus- have a poor prognosis? Do implants re-
pect, the endodontic/restorative option ally have fewer complications? Is retreat-
does not always receive its due merits. ment as easy? Do anterior and posterior
Whenever we are faced with such a teeth behave the same? When is the
compromised tooth, we have to con- prognosis of the tooth unfavorable and
sider the following question: is the tooth at what point is extraction and an im-
maintainable? If so, then this is surely plant the best option? These and many
our primary goal. However, the question other relevant questions are eloquently
is complicated by the context – ie, is this addressed below by our essayist and
a young patient? Is this a bridge abut- EAED Active Member, Dr Konrad Mey-
ment? Is there an esthetic challenge, ie, enberg. My hope is that this paper will
a dark tooth? In the younger patient, it serve to help us to question our treat-
may be desirable to maintain a poten- ment choices more critically in this area,
tially hopeless tooth for as long as pos- suggest useful answers to many of the
sible in order to “buy time” and delay the questions in this dilemma, provide us
day of implant placement and its subse- with objective criteria on which to base
quent eventual failure. Retreatment of a our judgements and finally offer solu-
tooth is, more often than not, simpler with tions so that we can make better choices
a broader range of options than retreat- for the treatment of our patients.
ment of a failed implant, particularly in
the esthetic zone. If this can be done Dr Tidu Mankoo, BDS
239
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t46..&3
SCIENTIFIC SESSION
240
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t46..&3
MEYENBERG
Fig 1 Cracks in lower first molar due to deep cavity. Fig 2 Fracture of first upper premolar due to deep
cavity with endodontic treatment.
Fig 3 Fracture of palatal Fig 4 Fracture originating from the apex of a canine due to the use of
root of upper first molar due inadequate endodontic techniques.
to endodontic treatment.
241
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t46..&3
SCIENTIFIC SESSION
teeth decreases, which means that this to dispense with posts in many indica-
dentin is much less fatigue resistant.17 tions, as they are no longer required for
In addition, even vital dentin loses some the retention of a core build-up.
of its initial strength over its lifetime: it However, mindful clinicians can still
shows a different fracture behavior as observe a relatively high rate of vertical
the mineral content increases over time root fractures despite the absence of
and causes a less favorable fracture be- posts and even with the use of adhe-
havior because of the increased brittle- sive techniques – above all in curved
ness.18,19 and small roots; indeed some authors
report up to 20% of vertical fractures of
Restorative options: endodontically treated teeth. Man-
242
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t46..&3
MEYENBERG
243
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t46..&3
SCIENTIFIC SESSION
The ferrule effect may also compen- #BTJDBMMZ UIFSF BSF UXP DPOGMJDUJOH JT-
sate unexpected breakdown of adhe- sues causing some disagreements on
sion after bonding and luting proce- the ideal material of a post.2 From a me-
dures in unqualified dentin conditions. chanical standpoint, it is evident that a
A safe clinical concept always implies post stiffer than dentin can take up more
the incorporation of a ‘belt and braces’ load but induces more stress in some api-
approach to offset routes of potential cal parts of the root, which can increase
failure. the risk of a vertical root fracture. Con-
A special indication for a post is the versely, a post that has an elastic modu-
immature root, presenting with a large lus closer to dentin will, in fact, induce
root canal. less stress concentration apically in the
Obviously neither gutta-percha nor root, but more in the cervical region.
MTA nor composite have a significant In addition, the interface between
reinforcing effect. In this instance, the post and core and between core and
only significant reinforcing effect is dentin is also subjected to stress, so one
achieved with a post. This is in line with can expect to see more root fractures
the clinical observation of increased risk JSSFQBSBCMF GSBDUVSFT
XJUI TUJGGFS QPTUT
of fracture in immature teeth left without made from metallic or ceramic materi-
post and core-build up after endodontic als, whereas more flexible posts would
treatment. show more post fractures, debonding of
core materials and loss of retention (pos-
If a post is indicated: TJCMZSFQBJSBCMF
XJUITVCTFRVFOUQSPC-
lems of leakage and caries. The latter
what post concept should be
may lead to endodontic reinfection and
used: stiff or flexible?
catastrophic coronal destruction of tooth
“If something can break, it will break, and substance, thus leveling out the poten-
it will always break at the weakest point” tial advantage of this latter concept over
– this basic finding and classic rule for the first one.
construction is also true for this applica- The dilemma for the clinician is the
tion and may explain the significant con- meaningful interpretation of the litera-
troversies regarding what would be the ture, as countless studies have been
best of all the available concepts. The published in this field, most of them being
question may be not whether something in vitro studies with questionable clinical
will break, but rather where it will break. potential relevance. Numerous theoreti-
Almost all dental materials have been cal studies using finite element analysis
used clinically for posts. Still clinically have also been performed, which would
relevant today are gold-alloys, chrome- all need to be verified according to clas-
cobalt, titanium, zirconia and glass fib- sic engineering principles in a real mod-
er posts. Carbon fiber posts have no el, but only a minority of the in vitro stud-
clinical significance due to poor clinical ies have been performed with dynamic
performance and disastrous potential; or fatigue loading under a simulated
therefore they will not be discussed in oral environment. Another difficulty is
this article. that study results are also influenced by
244
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t46..&3
MEYENBERG
245
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t46..&3
SCIENTIFIC SESSION
expertise. Only this combination finally with different concepts of build-ups. All
leads to clinical evidence. teeth were finally crowned with porcelain
As a conclusion from numerous clini- GVTFEUPNFUBM 1'.
DSPXOT"OPWFSBMM
cal studies, it must be stated that there is failure rate in this 6-year survival study of
OPTVQFSJPSDPODFQUJOBMMSFTQFDUT#PUI XBTSFQPSUFE8IFOPOMZBDJSDVMBS
direct and indirect concepts and gold, ferrule of 2 mm or less was left, the fail-
Ti, fiber and zirconia posts work well if ure rate increased to nearly 90 to 100%
the respective concepts are properly ex- GPSUIFOPQPTUDPODFQU
UPUPGPS
ecuted. The single most important point prefabricated posts, and to around 70%
is to preserve as much remaining tooth for the customized post concept.
structure as possible.
The results clearly suggest that pre-
Two additional arguments may require fabricated fiber posts are superior
consideration for the reconstructive cli- to customized fiber posts (glassfiber
nician: a) fiber posts offer the highest CBOE
SFTJOJNQSFHOBUFE
PSDPNQPTJUF
potential for reintervention due to their cores without any posts, if there are only
relative ease of removal, however their 2 walls or less remaining. However, even
successful use clinically is much more if in addition to the bonded core a pre-
technique sensitive,58 and b) post and fabricated fiber post is used, the con-
cores with a high modulus of elasticity cept obviously fails to be convincingly
NFUBM PS [JSDPOJB
PGGFS B IJHIFS GSBD- successful in cases with extended tooth
ture resistance as a foundation of the destruction.
crown,50 which may be of significance *ODPOUSBTUUPUIJTPWFSBMMGBJMVSF
for the long-term success of all-ceramic rate over 6 years of non-metallic posts
crowns.59,60 and build-ups, a 10-year report of pre-
fabricated metal posts and cast metal
What about bonding a post into QPTUTBOEDPSFTSFTVMUFEJOBBOE
PWFSBMMGBJMVSFSBUF
the root canal space? Does bond-
ing help in cases with extended
Retention
amount of tooth destruction?
The almost doubled overall failure rate
What is the ideal surface condi- of fiber posts and the surprisingly high
tioning of fiber posts? debonding rate must raise the question
Looking at the results of a recent clini- about the effectiveness and efficiency
cal 10-year fiber post study, a surpris- of this concept in general practice. Per-
JOHMZIJHIBOOVBMGBJMVSFSBUFPGJT haps it is unsurprising given the inher-
reported and an overall failure rate of ently more technique-sensitive concept
XJUIGJCFSQPTUGSBDUVSFTBOE of the required adhesive techniques and
11% post debondings.61 The highest the lack of a simple clear user protocol.
probability of a failure was reported for A recent study compared the reten-
anterior teeth with no cavity walls. tion of different fiber posts with different
This is confirmed by another clini- surface conditionings (performed ac-
cal study62 where premolars of varying cording to the manufacturer‘s recom-
degrees of destruction were restored NFOEBUJPOT
BOE MVUJOH BHFOUT JO EFO-
246
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t46..&3
MEYENBERG
tin Ti-posts luted with conventional zinc etching with hydrogen peroxide for
phosphate-cement served as the con- NJO
PS NFUIZMFOF DIMPSJEF GPS T
trol group. The control Ti-post showed, or micromechanical treatments (sand-
together with some combinations of the CMBTUJOH
PSBDPNCJOBUJPOPGCPUIIBWF
test group, the highest pull-out strength, been proposed. Surprisingly, sand-
whereas some combinations of the test blasting seems to not affect the mechan-
group showed surprisingly low values. ical properties of the fiber posts.75 Sand-
This is in line with another study, where blasting with silanization is, therefore, an
adhesively luted fiber posts were not efficient, simple and predictable way of
superior to gold posts either adhesively surface conditioning a fiber post before
luted or conventionally cemented with bonding.77,78 However, fiber posts are
glass ionomer cement.65 susceptible to water degradation, and
damaging the surface will increase this
Adhesion to radicular dentin phenomenon. Thus, a predictable bond-
Adhesively luting a post into root den- ing procedure that completely seals the
tin is a controversial issue. Conflicting post surface and avoids any voids is of
results have been published about the paramount importance to preserve frac-
efficacy of bonding to radicular dentin. ture resistance.79 Some manufacturers
Probably due to the structural differenc- now use a coating on their posts to fur-
es in radicular dentin, bond strengths ther simplify and improve the bonding.80
improve from the apical to the coronal Nevertheless, care should be taken to
section. Comparing the use of compli- consider both the manufacturers’ rec-
cated separated dentin bonding and lut- ommendations and their scientific basis.
ing procedures with simpler self-etching
cements, it seems clinically more relia- Mechanical properties
ble to use self-etching and self priming Major differences in the mechanical
cements taking into account the poten- properties of different brands of posts
tially somewhat lower bond strength to is another critical point. Since there
dentin.66-71 Inadequate ability to cure are now countless brands of posts on
the luting agents precludes the use the market with a sometimes-unknown
of light-curing materials. Dual-cure or origin, a proper selection based on in-
chemically curing materials should be dependent scientific investigations is
used instead, since different fiber posts imperative to avoid basic mechanical
indeed differ in their light transmitting failures.81,82 Using a fatigue resistance
properties, however posts with optimal test, a difference of roughly 7,000 cy-
mechanical properties do not allow cles until fracture for the worst and up
enough light penetrating all over the to 2,000,000 cycles for the best post in
whole length of the post to sufficiently UIJTSFTQFDU FRVJWBMFOUUPOPCSFBLBHF
polymerize light-cured materials.72 could be shown. The quality of the man-
ufacturing processes including type of
Adhesion to post surface fiber and matrix, pre-tensioning of fibers,
To improve bond strength to the pre- bond between fibers and matrix, among
fabricated fiber posts, chemical (silane, other factors, play an important role.
247
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t46..&3
SCIENTIFIC SESSION
Fig 5 Case 1: initial radiograph of non-vital cen- Fig 6 Case 1: initial clinical situation, large com-
tral incisors with different degree of remaining tooth posite build-ups, discolorations.
substance, final radiograph of build-ups with short
GJCFSQPTUTQMBDFE PVUMJOFEGPSCFUUFSWJTJCJMJUZ
Fig 7 Case 1: abutment teeth after removal of ex- Fig 8 Case 1: abutment teeth after internal bleach-
isting composite cores. ing.
Fig 9 Case 1: build-ups of abutment teeth com- Fig 10 Case 1: build-ups of abutment teeth com-
pleted with fiber posts and composite core, buccal pleted with fiber posts and composite core, occlusal
view. view.
248
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t46..&3
MEYENBERG
249
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t46..&3
SCIENTIFIC SESSION
References, Part 1 dehydration and rehydra- 21. Ni CW, Chang CH, Chen TY,
tion on some mechanical Chuang SF. A multipara-
.BOOPDDJ'
#IVWB#
properties of human dentin. metric evaluation of post-
Stern S. Restoring teeth +#JPNFDIo restored teeth with simulat-
following root canal re-treat- 1065. FECPOFMPTT.FDI#FIBW
ment. Endodontic Topics 12. Grigoratos D, Knowles #JPNFE.BUFSo
2011;19:125–152. J, Ng YL, Gulabivala K.
2. Kishen A. Mechanisms and Effect of exposing dentin 22. Tsesis I, Rosen E, Tamse A,
risk factors for fracture pre- to sodium hypochlorite and Taschieri S, Kfir A. Diagno-
dilection in endodontically calcium hydroxide on its sis of vertical root fractures
treated teeth. Endodontic flexural strength and elastic in endodontically treated
5PQJDTo modulus. Int Endod J teeth based on clinical and
(IFS.&+S
%VOMBQ3.
o radiographic indices: a
Anderson MH, Kuhl LV. (PMETNJUI.
(VMBCJWBMB systematic review. J Endod
Clinical survey of fractured K, Knowles JC. The effect o
teeth. J Am Dent Assoc of sodium hypochlorite irri- 'VTT;
-VTUJH+
5BNTF"
o gant concentration on tooth Prevalence of vertical root
$IBO$1
-JO$1
5TFOH4$
surface strain. J Endod fractures in extracted endo-
Jeng JH. Vertical root frac- 2002;28:575–579. dontically treated teeth. Int
ture in endodontically versus 4BMFI""
&UUNBO8. &OEPE+o
nonendodontically treated Effect of endodontic irriga- $PQQFOT$3.
%F.PPS
UFFUIBTVSWFZPG tion solutions on microhard- RJG. Prevalence of vertical
cases in Chinese patients. ness of root canal dentin. J root fractures in extracted
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral %FOUo endodontically treated teeth.
Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 4PV[B#JFS$"
4IFNFTI *OU&OEPE+
o H, Tanomaru-Filho H, 25. Tamse A, Fuss Z, Lustig J,
5. Reeh ES, Messer HH, Wesselink PR, Wu M. The Kaplavi J. An evaluation
Douglas WH. Reduction in ability of different nickel- of endodontically treated
tooth stiffness as a result titanium rotary instruments vertically fractured teeth. J
of endodontic and restora- to induce dentinal damage Endod 1999;25:506–508.
tive procedures. J Endod during canal preparation. J 26. Vire DE. Failure of endodon-
1989;15:512–516. &OEPEo tically treated teeth: clas-
6. Asundi A, Kishen A. Digital 16. Ferrari M, Mason PN, sification and evaluation. J
photoelastic investigations Goracci C, Pashley DH, Tay &OEPEo
on the tooth-bone interface. FR. Collagen degradation 27. Salvi GE, Siegrist Guldener
+#JPNFE0QUo in endodontically treated #&
"NTUBE5
+PTT"
-BOH
teeth after clinical function. NP. Clinical evaluation of
7. Jantarat J, Palamara JE, +%FOU3FTo root filled teeth restored
Lindner C, Messer HH. with or without post-and-
Time dependent properties 17. Randow K, Glanz PO. core systems in a specialist
of human root dentin. Dent On cantilever loading of practice setting. Int Endod J
.BUFSo vital and non-vital teeth. o
8. Kishen A, Asundi A. Experi- An experimental clinical 28. Kishen A, Kumar GV, Chen
mental investigation on the study. Acta Odontol Scand NN. Stress–strain response
role of water in the mechani- o in human dentin: rethinking
cal behavior of structural #BKBK%
4VOEBSBN/
/B[- fracture predilection in post-
EFOUJO+#JPNFE.BUFS3FT ari A, Arola D. Age, dehy- core restored teeth. Dent
"o dration and fatigue crack 5SBVNBUPMo
9. Kruzic JJ, Nalla RK, Kin- HSPXUIJOEFOUJO#JPNBUFSJ- 29. Zarow M, Devoto W, Sara-
ney JH, Ritchie RO. Crack als 2006;27:2507–2517. cinelli M. Reconstruction
blunting, crack bridging and 19. Viguet-Carrin S,Garnero of endodontically treated
resistance-curve fracture P,Delmas PD. The role posterior teeth – with or
mechanics in dentin: effect of collagen in bone without post? Guidelines for
PGIZESBUJPO#JPNBUFSJBMT strength. Osteoporos Int the dental practitioner. Eur J
o o &TUIFU%FOUo
(BMF.4
%BSWFMM#8%FOUJO 20. Magne P, Douglas WH. 4PV[B&.
EP/BTDJNFOUP
permeability and tracer Rationalization of esthetic LM, Maia Filho EM, Alves
tests. J Dent 1999;27:1–11. restorative dentistry based CM. The impact of post
11. Jameson MW, Hood JA, on biomimetics. J Esthet preparation on the residual
5JENBSTI#(5IFFGGFDUTPG Dent 1999;11:5–15. dentin thickness of maxil-
250
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t46..&3
MEYENBERG
251
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t46..&3
SCIENTIFIC SESSION
252
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t46..&3
MEYENBERG
face conditioning. J Adhes 80. Schmage P, Nergiz I, Marko- of fiber posts: three-point
Dent 2006;8:105–111. poulou S, Pfeiffer P. Resist- bending test and SEM
78. Zicari F, De Munck J, Scotti ance against pull-out force evaluation. Dent Mater
R, Naert I, Van Meerbeek of prefabricated coated 2005;21:75–82.
#'BDUPSTBGGFDUJOHUIF FRC posts. J Adhes Dent (SBOEJOJ4
$IJFGGJ/
cement-post interface. Dent o Cagidiaco MC, Goracci C,
Mater 2012;28:287–297. 81. Cheleux N, Sharrock PJ. Ferrari M. Fatigue resistance
79. Vano M, Carvalho C, Sedda Mechanical properties of and structural integrity of
M, Gabriele M, García- glass fiber-reinforced endo- different types of fiber posts.
Godoy F, Ferrari M. The influ- EPOUJDQPTUT"DUB#JPNBUFS Dent Mater J 2008;27:687–
ence of storage condition o
and duration on the resist- 82. Grandini S, Goracci C,
ance to fracture of different Monticelli F, Tay FR, Ferrari
fiber post systems. Am J M. Fatigue resistance and
%FOUo structural characteristics
253
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t46..&3
SCIENTIFIC SESSION
Unfortunately almost all root canal seal- the tooth are heavily discolored and do
ers including Zinc Oxide-Eugenol and not respond to the bleaching procedure.
") UPBMFTTFSFYUFOU
MFBEUPEJTDPM-
PSBUJPO
BCPWFBMMJOUIFDFSWJDBM[POF Do bleaching procedures lead to
Also the use of MTA, be it grey or white, external resorption?
will ultimately lead to a greyish appear-
ance or darkening of the root.5,6 Cervical root resorption is a serious
Furthermore, the calcification pro- complication that is difficult to treat11,12
cess in the dentin through obliteration and ultimately can lead to tooth loss.
of the dentinal tubules and changes in There are various reasons for this phe-
the free water content before and after nomenon. Orthodontic treatment and
endodontic treatment and through ag- tooth trauma are the most common pre-
ing processes, contributes to an altered disposing factor. Internal bleaching may
optical appearance in addition to the in- increase the combinatory risk, however
creased brittleness.7-10 it seems to be limited to cases where
extensive concentrations of H2O2 com-
How can we improve the color of bined with heat (the thermo-catalytic
254
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t46..&3
MEYENBERG
nective tissue attachment, whereas the further compromise the strength of the
coronal seal is achieved with adhesively residual tooth structure. This is an im-
luted composite to ensure an optimal portant consideration particularly if ad-
penetration of the bleaching agent into ditional reconstructive measures are to
the dentin. Hence, leaving the access be executed26 and if the potential for re-
cavity open and using at-home tech- intervention is taken into account.
niques with open trays is not advisable.17 Second, as mentioned, bleaching
Success largely depends from the ap- agents themselves lead to a weakening
plication duration of the bleaching agent of the tooth structure through the chemi-
oEBZT
oUJNFT
BOECZGBSPVUQFS- cal modification of the dentin.27,28 A re-
forms alternative quick in-office tech- cent publication supported the use of
niques in the long run.18 In a recent study sodium perborate mixed with water in
it could also be shown that this concept this respect, since this combination led
compares very favorably to more ag- to a significantly smaller additional open-
gressive mixtures of chemicals in terms ing of the dentinal tubules compared to
of H2O2 leakage at different root locations all other bleaching agents. Interestingly
with and without external defects.19,20 DBSCBNJEF QFSPYJEF DBVTFE UIF
Since cervical defects are difficult to worst effect.29
detect with conventional radiographs Another important consideration is
and require cone beam computed to- the influence of bleaching on dentin
NPHSBQIZ $#$5
UFDIOJRVFT
21 the use bonding. As emphasized in part 1, the
of this less-aggressive concept makes quality of the internal reconstruction af-
additional sense in avoiding added un- ter endodontic therapy is of key impor-
known risks while producing good es- tance in reconstituting the resistance to
thetic results. fracture. Using an adhesive approach is
advisable but technique sensitive and,
Do bleaching procedures weaken in general, all bleaching agents lead to
the tooth – or may dark roots also reduced bond strengths and increased
microleakage. Consequently, the use
be bleached?
of antioxidants has been advocated to
Recent research clearly shows that counteract this effect (eg, sodium ascor-
bleaching chemicals weaken tooth sub- CBUF
BOEPSEFMBZJOHUIFCPOEJOHQSP-
stance. cedure for at least 10 days after washing
Since the endodontic treatment itself out the bleaching agent The antioxi-
already weakens the dentin consider- dant is especially necessary and should
ably through chemical and mechanical be mandatory if bonding with simplified
effects CZ UP JO TUSFOHUI
25 single bond dentin adhesives, or if de-
additional care must be taken if a bleach- layed bonding is not warranted or pos-
ing procedure is being considered. sible.
First of all, internal removal of dis- However, good dentin adhesion can be
colored dentin should be avoided. It achieved if: a) sodium perborate mixed
does not lead to better results with the with water is used to bleach, b) the tooth
described bleaching technique and will is left with saline solution for 7 days after
255
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t46..&3
SCIENTIFIC SESSION
Fig 17 $BTF BCVUNFOU UPPUI BGUFS DSPXO BOE Fig 18 $BTFIPMMPXDPNQPTJUFCVJMEVQGPSJOUFS-
post removal. nal bleaching of coronal part of the abutment tooth.
256
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t46..&3
MEYENBERG
Fig 19 $BTFDPNQMFUFECVJMEVQPGBCVUNFOU Fig 20 $BTF HMBTT DFSBNJD DSPXO
MBZFSJOH
tooth with bonded fiber post and core, after internal technique.
bleaching with sodium perborate and water.
257
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t46..&3
SCIENTIFIC SESSION
258
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t46..&3
MEYENBERG
259
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t46..&3
SCIENTIFIC SESSION
Fig 24 $BTF EJTDPMPSFE BCVUNFOU UFFUI XJUI Fig 25 $BTFGJOBMQJDUVSFXJUI1'.DSPXOT%VF
cast post and cores, leading to a disturbance in the to the symmetry of the case, the suboptimal color
illumination of the adjacent tissues. transition from the abutment margins into the gin-
gival tissues fortunately does not disturb too much
in this case.
If the tooth needs an additional indi- is similar to what can be observed within
rect restoration, a veneer or full cover- the enamel of natural teeth.
age veneer-crown is an attractive and One drawback certainly is if the dis-
less invasive solution. In the author’s colored tooth has already been restored
own experience over the last 15 years with a post. If removal of the post without
from when the concept first was used, risk of damage to the root is viable, then
long-term results for esthetics and sur- the internal bleaching can be performed
vival rates in both types of restorations before a new post and core is fabricat-
are comparable to all-ceramic crowns. ed. If this is considered too risky, metallic
However, in the literature there are only posts and cores can at least be masked
studies with vital teeth available at the with a tooth-colored opaquer and com-
moment, which show a survival rate of posite to avoid to improve the substrate
PWFS ZFBST GPS WFOFFST BOE color for an all-ceramic framework.
100% for extended veneers over 5 This leads to the next question: Can
years.60,61 The observation of small su- tooth-colored posts enhance the color
perficial cracks not influencing survival of dark roots?
Tooth-colored posts have long been
advocated in esthetic dentistry. Since
early trials around 1965 by John McLean
with Alumina posts, the concept has
been further developed to mechanically
more reliable posts, with the introduc-
tion of the first Zirconia posts in 1995
and the first fiber posts in 1990.
The proposed reasons for tooth-color-
ed posts for esthetics in root treated
teeth are:
To illuminate the root and cervical re-
Fig 26 Case 5: left central incisor with polished
cast post and core, right lateral incisor with tooth- gion and thus brighten up darkened
colored post and core. tooth substance.
260
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t46..&3
MEYENBERG
Fig 27 Case 5: final picture showing the good Fig 28 Case 6: abutment teeth with various de-
reflection properties of the polished metal part of the grees of discolorations.
left central abutment tooth.
261
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t46..&3
SCIENTIFIC SESSION
262
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t46..&3
MEYENBERG
Fig 30 Case 6: final picture of the four anterior Fig 31 Case 6: final picture of the right side,
teeth, showing an acceptable color transition be- showing an acceptable color transition between the
UXFFOUIFQPOUJD SJHIUMBUFSBMJODJTPS
BOEUIFPUIFS QPOUJD MBUFSBMJODJTPS
UIFWJUBMDBOJOFBOEUIFOPO
abutment teeth. vital discolored central incisor.
263
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t46..&3
SCIENTIFIC SESSION
short- and long-term biologic, esthetic previous studies and may produce less
and technical complications of implants successful results than expected or than
are not fully appreciated.77 Unfortu- achieved with the classic concepts of
nately, poor endodontic treatment is still experienced endodontic specialists. A
a major factor in premature tooth loss. MPOHUFSNTUVEZPWFSZFBST
DPOEVDU-
However, if performed correctly, results ed in a private practice by a specialist,
are at least as good as replacement with documented an overall success rate of
implants for single units.77 It is striking 91.5%.80 Initial endodontic treatments
that despite this fact, today a tendency IBEBIJHIFSTVDDFTTSBUF
DPN-
towards a more extraction-oriented re- pared to the non-surgical retreatment
constructive concept can be observed HSPVQ
5IJT TIPXT WFSZ DMFBSMZ
in practice. There are two main reasons how important the quality of the first en-
for this. dodontic treatment is for the long-term
The first reason is that in clinical de- success. In addition, the coronal resto-
cision-making, the predictability of the ration has a significant influence in the
whole procedure is of primary impor- success of the endodontic treatment.
tance in respect of complications and Thus, to strive in every respect for an
cost. Obviously there is some pessimism optimal restoration is as essential as an
among clinicians regarding the progno- optimal endodontic treatment alone.81
sis of endodontic treatments in general The second reason is that measures
and this is not completely unfounded. to potentially save a compromised tooth
The combined failure rate of endodonti- can later preclude the placement of
cally treated teeth in general practice is an implant or make it very demanding.
higher than described in earlier reports: Therefore, if an endodontic retreatment
PWFSZFBSTBDVNVMBUJWFGBJMVSFSBUFPG due to recurrent apical pathology is
up to 20% is documented.78 In general, considered, above all, careful diagnos-
the outcome of endodontic treatments tic steps including soft and hard tissue
may have been overestimated in previ- probing and radiographs are required.
ously published reviews because of the Conventional radiographs do not allow
general lack of correct apical diagnosis. proper analysis and interpretation of the
*GIJHISFTPMVUJPO$#$5JTOPUVTFE
PGUFO root and remaining bone housing around
the endodontic status cannot correctly the root. The possible causes for the
be analyzed. The authors of a current endodontic failure (eg, crack, fracture,
review state: “In conclusion, the serious perforation, insufficient root filling or ac-
limitations of longitudinal clinical studies DFTTPSZSPPUDBOBMT
DBOOPUCFQSPQFSMZ
restrict the correct interpretation of root established without a high-resolution
canal treatment outcomes. Systematic $#$5BOEDPOTFRVFOUMZ
UIFQSPHOPTJT
reviews reporting the success rates of and appropriate treatment approach
root canal treatment without referring can only be determined based on an
to these limitations may mislead read- accurate diagnosis.
ers”.79 Therefore, the trend towards sim- Periapical microsurgery should be
plified endodontic protocols may also performed exclusively if non-surgical
be based on incorrect interpretations of endodontic retreatment is not viable,
264
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t46..&3
MEYENBERG
and if the remaining bone housing is suf- tal tooth-supported restorations, there is
ficient. The surgical approach seems to no clear winner in terms of sustainabil-
be more successful in the short term, but JUZ
FTUIFUJDT
CJPMPHZBOEGVODUJPO#PUI
MFTTTPJOUIFMPOHUFSNPWFSUP solutions require a perfect synergy of all
6 years for the non-surgical approach, the fields of specialties involved and the
WFSTVTPWFSNPSFUIBOZFBSTGPS treatment steps to achieve the optimal
the surgical approach.82 In addition, the result for the individual patient.
added bone loss caused by the surgical
access osteotomy and incomplete heal- Acknowledgements
ing can make the placement of an im- The author would like to thank Dr Tidu Mankoo for
plant after a potential failure and eventful the systematic and thorough editing of the whole es-
TBZ
%S'SBOL1BRVÏGPSIJTTVQQPSUJOUIFEJTDVTTJPO
extraction very difficult.
of the endodontic aspects, and Walter Gebhard and
Ultimately, when we examine the treat- Nic Pietrobon for their contribution in creating the
ment outcome of implant versus non-vi- dental ceramics.
265
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t46..&3
SCIENTIFIC SESSION
266
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t46..&3
.&:&/#&3(
MEYENBERG
267
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t46..&3
SCIENTIFIC SESSION
71. Bressan E, Paniz G, Lops 76. Allen EP, Winter RR. Inter- 80. Imura N, Pinheiro ET, Gomes
D, Corazza B, Romeo E, disciplinary treatment of BP, Zaia AA, Ferraz CC,
Favero G. Influence of abut- cervical lesions. Compend Souza-Filho FJ. The out-
ment material on the gingi- Contin Educ Dent 2011;32 come of endodontic treat-
val color of implant-support- Spec No 5:16–20. ment: a retrospective study
ed all-ceramic restorations: 77. Ricci G, Ricci A, Ricci C. of 2000 cases performed
a prospective multicenter Save the natural tooth or by a specialist. J Endod
study. Clin Oral Implants place an implant? Three 2007;33:1278–1282.
Res 2011;22:631–637. periodontal decisional 81. Balto K. Root-filled teeth
72. Langer B, Langer L. Sub- criteria to perform a cor- with adequate restora-
epithelial connective tissue rect therapy. Int J Peri- tions and root canal treat-
graft technique for root odontics Restorative Dent ment have better treatment
coverage. J Periodontol 2011;31:29–37. outcomes. Evid Based Dent
1985;56:715–720. 78. Bernstein SD, Horowitz AJ, 2011;12:72–73.
73. Raetzke PB. Covering local- Man M, Wu H, Foran D, 82. Naito T. Surgical or nonsur-
ized areas of root exposure Vena DA, Collie D, Matthews gical treatment for teeth with
employing the “envelope” AG, Curro FA, Thompson existing root filings? Evid
technique. J Periodontol VP, Craig RG. Outcomes Based Dent 2010;11:54–55.
1985;56:397–402. of endodontic therapy in 83. Torabinejad M, Anderson
74. Burkhardt R, Lang NP. Cov- general practice: A study by P, Bader J, Brown LJ, Chen
erage of localized gingival the Practitioners Engaged LH, Goodacre CJ, Kattadiyil
recessions: comparison of in Applied Research and MT, Kutsenko D, Lozada J,
micro- and macrosurgical Learning Network. J Am Patel R, Petersen F, Puter-
techniques. J Clin Periodon- Dent Assoc 2012;143:478– man I, White SN. Outcomes
tol 2005;32:287–293. 487. of root canal treatment and
75. Burkhardt R, Hürzeler MB. 79. Wu MK, Shemesh H, Wes- restoration, implant-sup-
Utilization of the surgical selink PR. Limitations of ported single crowns, fixed
microscope for advanced previously published sys- partial dentures, and extrac-
plastic periodontal surgery. tematic reviews evaluating tion without replacement: a
Pract Periodontics Aesthet the outcome of endodon- systematic review. J Pros-
Dent 2000;12:171–180. tic treatment. Int Endod J thet Dent 2007;98:285–311.
2009;42:656–666.
268
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t46..&3