Obligations and Contracts: By: Atty. Wilfred Francis B. Martinez
Obligations and Contracts: By: Atty. Wilfred Francis B. Martinez
Obligations and Contracts: By: Atty. Wilfred Francis B. Martinez
CONTRACTS
LECTURE 5
By: Atty. Wilfred Francis B. Martinez
NATURE AND EFFECTS OF
OBLIGATIONS
Breach of Obligations
FORTUITOUS EVENTS / CASO
FORTUITO
Fortuitous Events
Article 1174. Except in cases expressly specified by the
law, or when it is otherwise declared by stipulation, or
when the nature of the obligation requires the
assumption of risk, no person shall be responsible for
those events which could not be foreseen, or which,
though foreseen, were inevitable.
Fortuitous Events
What is a fortuitous events?
Any event which cannot be foreseen, or which, though foreseen,
is inevitable.
In other words: Any event which is either impossible to foresee or
impossible to avoid.
Case Studies:
Roberto Sicam vs Lulu Jorge (G.R. No. 159617, 8 August 2007)
Fil-Estate Properties, Inc. vs Spouses Go (G.R. No. 185798, 13
January 2014)
Fortuitous Events (SW7)
On the morning of April 1, 1946, X, was a riding the early morning
train of the Railroad Company from Laguna to Manila;
That when the train reached the Paco Railroad station, Y, a train
guard of the Railroad Company assigned in the Manila-San Fernando,
La Union Line, happened to be in said station waiting for the same
train which would take him to Tutuban Station, where he was going to
report for duty;
That Y had a long standing personal grudge against X, same dating
back during the Japanese occupation;
That because of this personal grudge, Y shot X with the carbine
furnished to him by the Railroad Company for his use as such train
guard, upon seeing him inside the train coach. X died instantly;
The wife of X claims that the Railroad Company is liable for damages.
The Railroad Company counters that they are free from liability
because it was a Fortuitous Event or Caso Fortuito. WHO IS
CORRECT? (4 Points)
Fortuitous Events (SW7)
ANSWER:
Cornelia De Gillaco vs Manila Railroad Company (G.R. No. L-
8034, 18 November 1955)
The Court ruled that the situation can be considered as a
Fortuitous Event, Manila Railroad cannot be held liable since:
1. The Railroad company had no means to ascertain or anticipate that
the two rivals would meet;
2. The Railroad company could not be expected to foresee or would
have known about the personal lives of each of their employees; and
3. The Railroad company could not be expected to foresee any
animosity or rancor between its employees and its thousands of
passengers every single day.
Transmissibility of Rights
Transmissibility of Rights
Art. 1178. Subject to the laws, all rights acquired in
virtue of an obligation are transmissible, if there has
been no stipulation to the contrary.
Transmissibility of Rights
General Rule:
All rights acquired through an obligation is transmissible to
another person.
Exception:
1. If the parties stipulate in their contract that the rights acquired
by a party (or both parties) is non-transmissible.
2. If the nature of the obligation prevents transmissibility.
Example: Service of a prison sentence or any other criminal penalty
imposed by a court of law.
3. Where they are non-transmissible by operation of law.
Transmissibility of Rights
Example of a Right Being Transmitted:
X lent money to Y in the amount of P1,000.
X has the right to collect the P1,000.00 from Y as soon as it becomes
due and demandable.
X, however, owes A and B, P500.00 each.
X has an obligation to pay back A and B, P500.00 each.
Thus, X can tell A and B to collect P500.00 each from Y.
In this situation, X is transmitting his right to collect the debt of Y to A
and B.
Thank you.
Please prepare for LONG EXAM #1 next meeting.
100 items.
Coverage: INTRODUCTION TO LAW until
TRANSMISSIBILITY OF RIGHTS