Scribd
Upload
56 views1 page

Topics PDF

The seminar paper topics cover a wide range of issues relating to media law and regulation of expression. Some of the key topics discussed include whether fine art can be regulated by law, the role of the "marketplace of ideas" in media regulation, defining what constitutes "speech" or "expression", reasons for regulating media, and whether media should be responsible for their impact on society. Other topics address regulating media stereotypes, the need for a public interest test in freedom of expression, protection of political speech and sources, regulating commercial speech, artistic expression, free speech on the internet, and regulating political campaigns.

Uploaded by

ajay narwal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
56 views1 page

Topics PDF

The seminar paper topics cover a wide range of issues relating to media law and regulation of expression. Some of the key topics discussed include whether fine art can be regulated by law, the role of the "marketplace of ideas" in media regulation, defining what constitutes "speech" or "expression", reasons for regulating media, and whether media should be responsible for their impact on society. Other topics address regulating media stereotypes, the need for a public interest test in freedom of expression, protection of political speech and sources, regulating commercial speech, artistic expression, free speech on the internet, and regulating political campaigns.

Uploaded by

ajay narwal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Seminar paper’s topics

Media Law

1. Relationship between fine arts and expression – can be fine art regulated through
law?
2. Is a “marketplace idea” still sustainable in media regulation?
3. How we can define “speech” or “expression” – what is beyond this definition?
4. Why to regulate media?
5. Are media responsible for their impact on society and shall the law regulate this
impact?
6. How we can regulate media stereotypes?
7. Do we need a public interest test in freedom of expression?
8. Untrue statements are not protected expressions.
9. People shall know everything – “Wikileaks” case.
10. Journalists should be more protected – Island legislation case.
11. Invasions into privacy of politicians are inexcusable.
12. There is no need for prior restraints in media regulation?
13. Public service media are needless.
14. Obscenity should not be protected.
15. Why to protect facts?
16. We do not have a “right not to speak”.
17. Why we need to protect political speech?
18. Journalist should not protect their sources.
19. Speak or not to speak – case of war.
20. Shall we protect commercial speech?
21. Artistic expression is beyond any legal regulation. E.g. Joyce´s Ulysses case.
22. It is impossible to regulate free speech on the Internet.
23. Media’s self-regulation is sufficient regulation.
24. Regulation of the investigative journalism is adequate.
25. Political campaigns should have tough regulation.

Range of work: 1500 words (approx. 5 pages)

You might also like