Researchrulbookf Inal
Researchrulbookf Inal
Researchrulbookf Inal
Approved at the
80th meeting of the Academic Senate
held on 30-03-2019
What it signifies
The crest and the motto adopted by the Acharya Nagarjuna
University represent the creative essence of Indian culture oriented
to the contemporary aspirations. The symbolism is based on the
concept that all human excellence proceeds from truth and culminates
in truth. The individual symbols in the crest are emblematically related
to one another, so as to suggest the upward evolution of the life
force from material plenitude and manifest reality towards spiritual
magnificence and universal consciousness. The youth initiated into
knowledge at the University shall achieve identity, growth, self-
differentiation and fulfillment in the various ascensions of intellectual
and spiritual states shown in the symbolic scheme of the crest.
The vase of plenty (PURNA-GHATA) is a prototype from the
Amaravati sculpture of the early centuries of the Christian era. It
stands for material prosperity on the one hand and objective
knowledge on the other. Its traditional attributes are sasya (fertility),
santana (increase), sampat (prosperity) and samriddhi (plenitude).
The vase is also a paradigmatic representation of the Universe and
the creative cycle according to ancient Indian scriptures. Its face is
Vishnu, the sustainer; its neck is Rudra, the apocalyptic transformer;
its base is Brahma, the creator.
Arising out of the superabundant water of life sprouting from
purna ghata and transcending them undane level, illuminated by the
resplendent halo of the Sun, is the freshly blossoming Lotus. The
pool of waters (manasa sarovara) symbolizes the creation. On the
apex are the dharma-chakra and the Lotus representing the creative
iii
readiness of the mind to respond to the summons of the creative
evolution symbolized by the solar orb.
On the apex are the dharma-chakra (the wheel of eternal
law) flanked by harinas (deer), over arched by the visva-padma (the
cosmic Lotus) flanked by makaras (symbols of the cosmic
consciousness). The dharma chakra is reminiscent not only of Gita
but also of the Buddha’s promulgation of the law (dharma
chakrapravartana). The deers, too, have a two-fold connotation. On
the one hand, they represent beatitude, and on the other, the highest
point of universal consciousness.
The motto, ‘Satye Sarvam Pratishtitam’ is an epigrammatic
representation of the entire symbolism of the crest. It is singularly
appropriate to the ideals and functions of the University which is
dedicated to the pursuit of truth which is the ultimate abode of all.
v
• To invite and implement collaborations with other institutes of
higher learning on a continuous basis for mutal academic
progress.
vi
ACHARYA NAGARJUNA UNIVERSITY
RESEARCH RULES AND REGULATIONS
CONTENTS
viii
8. Ph.D. Thesis / M.Phil. Dissertation 38
8.1 Guidelines for writing Thesis 38
8.2 Style of Presentation of Thesis 40
8.3 Guidelines for the preparation of Synopsis and Thesis 41
(i) Synopsis 41
(ii) Thesis 41
(iii) Binding 42
(iv) Plagiarism Test 43
8.4 Process of Adjudication 46
8.5 Expediting evaluation process 48
8.6 Ph.D. Open Viva-voce examination 49
9. Self-submission 52
10. Review of Status Process 52
11. Failure in the M. Phil./ Ph.D. Examination 52
11.1 Cancellation of Research Admission& Registration 53
12. Guidelines for Admission of International Scholars into
Research 54
13. Provisional Certificate 55
14. Treatment of Ph.D. / M.Phil. through Distance
Mode/Part-time 55
15. List of Research Scholars on website 55
16. Depository with SHODHGANGA INFLIBNET 56
17. M.Phil./Ph.D. degrees awarded by foreign Universities 56
18. UGC (Minimum Standards and Procedure for Award of
M.Phil./Ph.D Degree) Regulations-2016 56
Annexure – Declaration for Plagiarism Check 58
*****
ix
PREAMBLE
Research Programmes leading to the award of M. Phil. and Ph.D.
degrees are offered in the teaching departments/centres of the University
colleges, its affiliated colleges and research organizations recognized by
the University as research centres. The rules and regulations are strictly in
accordance with the Research Regulations for M.Phil. & Ph.D. programme
report framed by the constituted committee of Andhra Pradesh State
Council of Higher Education. These regulations approved in the 79th
meeting of the Academic Senate held on 27-10-2018 and the modified
regulations approved in the 80th meeting of the Academic Senate held on
30-03-2019 will come into force prospectively from the 2018-19 research
admissions. The implementation of the plagiarism test approved at the
67th meeting of the Academic Senate held on 20-12-2012 will come into
force retrospectively w.e.f. 01-04-2019 which is mandatory.
Vice-Chancellor - Chairman
Rector, ANU - Member
Principals of the Campus Colleges - Members
Registrar, ANU - Member
Deans of the Faculties, ANU - Members
Coordinator, Research Cell, ANU - Convener
1
2. DEPARTMENTAL RESEARCH COMMITTEE (DRC)
2
2. To approve the Academic Calendar for M.Phil./Ph.D. programmes
for the academic year.
3
11. All special cases which do not fall under the above categories shall
be discussed at the Academic Senate for final recommendations.
4
degree is eligible to be considered as research guide in a given
Department if he/she has publications as mentioned in (a) above.
4. RESEARCH CENTRES
4.1 Research Laboratories as Research Centres
7
c) Colleges may also access the required facilities of the neighbouring
Institutions/Colleges, or of those Institutions/Colleges/R&D
laboratories/ Organizations which have the required facilities.
8
k) In case of admission in affiliated colleges recognized as research
centers of University, there shall be a co-guide from the concerned
academic department of the constituent college of University or PG
center of University.
The grant of recognition for the centre applies only to the subject
concerned and not to the college as a whole. The college can apply for
recognition for more than one subject based on the availability of
infrastructural and other facilities in the subject concerned.
9
Ph.D. programmes based on the information provided by the institutions
and the recommendations of the Committee constituted by the Vice-
Chancellor for examining the infrastructure and other facilities.
5.1 Eligibility
10
established or incorporated under a law in its home country or any
other statutory authority in that country for the purpose of assessing,
accrediting or assuring quality and standards of educational institutions.
(b) A relaxation of 5% of marks, from 55% to 50%, or an equivalent
relaxation of grade, may be allowed for those belonging to SC/ST/
OBC (non-creamy layer)/Differently-Abled and other categories of
candidates as per the decision of the University Grants Commission
from time to time, or for those who had obtained their Master’s degree
prior to 19th September, 1991. The eligibility marks of 55% (or an
equivalent grade in a point scale wherever grading system is followed)
and the relaxation of 5% to the categories mentioned above are
permissible based only on the qualifying marks without including the
grace mark procedures.
5.1.2 Part-Time (PT)
Candidates satisfying the eligibility conditions noted under 4.1.1
above can be admitted as Part-time candidates through entrance test, as
per the following order of priority. Admission into Part-time category will
be made on the basis of service seniority in the respective categories.
1. Regular Faculty working in the University or the P.G. Centers.
2. (a) Faculty working in Post graduate and Professional colleges having
completed at least two years of service. This provision is not
applicable to Faculty teaching Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics
and Humanities in professional colleges.
or
(b) Faculty/Librarians/Asst. Librarians working in affiliated degree /
PG colleges and Faculty teaching Physics, Chemistry,
Mathematics and Humanities in professional colleges having
completed at least three years of service.
11
or
5.2.1.4 Interview
The interview shall also consider the following aspects, viz. whether:
16
5.4 Allocation of Research Supervisor
Professor 08 03
Associate Professor 06 02
Assistant Professor 04 01
17
A Research Supervisor, at any given point of time, cannot guide
more than the number of candidates allotted to him as mentioned above.
5. Candidates registered for Ph.D. (Full Time) and Ph.D. (Part Time)
after completion of the minimum period, Extramural, Executive, FDP,
National Fellowship holders, foreign nationals and Project Fellows
need not be counted for the purpose of determining the limit of number
of candidates under each guide. But a research supervisor/co-
supervisor cannot have more than 6, one each only, from the categories
of Extramural/Executive/FDP/National Fellowship holder/foreign
nationals/Project Fellows at any point of time. Similarly candidates
registered for M.Phil. (FT) and M.Phil. (PT) need not be counted for
fixing up the limit after completing the minimum period from the date
of registration, respectively.
20
Part-time M.Phil.
21
Seminar Examination Committee shall consist of the concerned
Research Guide, Head of the Department and the Chairman, Board of
Studies. The candidate shall give a seminar on the research topic
emphasizing the importance of the problem, review of literature,
methodology and techniques to be adopted including interpretation of
data and the expected outcome. The seminar is open to all members of
the department.
The panel of paper setters and examiners for Paper-I, II & III should
be provided by the Chairperson, Board of Studies from the list
approved by Board of Studies.
22
An M.Phil. scholar has to obtain a minimum of 55% of marks or its
equivalent grade in the UGC 7-point scale (or an equivalent grade/
CGPA in a point scale wherever grading system is followed) in the
course work in order to be eligible to continue in the programme and
submit the dissertation/thesis.
Failed Candidates in first attempt will be given only one other chance
to qualify in the examination. Registration for appearing for the
examination shall be considered as an attempt.
ii. After successful completion of the research work under the supervision
of the research guide and the pre-talk upon satisfactory completion
of course work, obtaining the marks/grade prescribed as above,
publishing research papers and presenting research papers in
seminars/conferences, the candidate shall submit a dissertation
embodying the results of his/her study. Three copies of the dissertation
are to be submitted out of which one should be hard bound.
6.6.1 Pre-talk
23
be suitably incorporated into the draft dissertation/thesis in consultation
with the Research Supervisor. Departmental Research Committee
should certify the eligibility for the submission of Thesis.
4. In case the external examiner does not evaluate the dissertation within
2 months, he/she may be replaced by a new external examiner.
7. In case the Viva Board has less than 3 members by virtue of a member
holding more than one position, the residual number of members so
required to constitute full Board will be nominated by the Vice-
Chancellor. The convener will fix the date and time of Viva-Voce
examination and intimate the same to all members with a copy to the
Co-ordinator, Research Cell, ANU.
10. Grades
Sl. No. Range of Marks % Grade Grade Points
1. 91-100 O 10 Outstanding
2. 81-90 A+ 9 Excellent
3. 71-80 A 8 Very Good
4. 61-70 B+ 7 Good
5. 56-60 B 6 Average
6. 50-55 C 5 Pass
7. <50 F 0 Fail
8. Ab 0 Ab (Absent)
25
The candidate must obtain a minimum of C Grade in each theory
paper, seminar, dissertation and viva for a pass.
6.8 Conversion from M.Phil. to Ph.D.
A candidate who has been awarded M.Phil. degree can register
for Ph.D. programme by applying within two months from the date of
award of M.Phil. degree provided he/she gets the consent of a research
guide from the same department. This provision is applicable for M.Phil.
(Full-Time) to Ph.D. (Full-Time) and M.Phil. (Part-Time) to Ph.D. (Part-
Time) conversions only. Notwithstanding anything contained in the above
in exceptional cases, the Vice-Chancellor can review and take a decision
which is final.
7. COURSE WORK AND EVALUATION-Ph.D. PROGRAMME
7.1 Duration of the Programme
a) A full-time Ph.D. student is required to spend the minimum prescribed
period of three years, in the case of Master’s Degree holders and
two years in the case of M.Phil. degree holders, in the University or
in one of the P.G. Centers or Institutions recognized by University as
Centers of Research.
b) The prescribed minimum period for Ph.D. part-time research with
M.Phil. degrees is four years and five years for those without M.Phil.
A part-time candidate employed in an outside institution will be
required to spend at least six weeks every year in the concerned
University Department during the prescribed total period of research.
c) If a candidate pursuing Ph.D. programme under either Full-Time/
Part-Time/Extramural is unable to complete the work in the
prescribed period, the Principal of the concerned constituent college
can give extension of time up to six months from the date of expiry
of registration beyond which the registration of the candidate ceases.
26
d) The research guide should inform the candidate about the expiry of
his/her registration.
Full-time Ph.D.
Part-time Ph.D.
28
Two credits shall be awarded for each presentation. Credits shall be
awarded by the Committee constituted with the Head of the Department,
Chairman Board of Studies and the Research Supervisor.
In case the progress of the research scholar is unsatisfactory, the
Committee shall record the reasons for the same and suggest corrective
measures. If the research scholar fails to get 60% of marks in progress
evaluation, the Committee may recommend to the University with specific
reasons for cancellation of the registration of the research scholar. For
Ph.D., the Candidate has to secure a minimum of 6 credits (60% marks)
out of total 10 credits (600 marks) during the last two years to become
eligible to submit his/her Ph.D. Thesis.
7.3 Course Work
The credits assigned to the Ph.D. course work shall be 14 credits
(Three Theory Papers, each 4 credits + One Seminar Paper, 2
Credits).
The Department where the scholar pursues his/her research shall
prescribe the course(s) to him/her based on the recommendations of
the DRC.
Course work for Pre. Ph.D. Examination consists of the following
four papers.
Paper – I: Research Methodology which could also cover areas such
as quantitative methods, computer applications, research
ethics and review of published research in the relevant field,
training, field work, etc. for 100 marks/Four Credits
Paper – II: Advanced Subject Paper/Recent Advances in the Subject
for 100 marks/Four Credits
Paper – III: Paper on research Area for 100 marks/Four Credits
Paper – IV: Open Seminar for 50 marks/Two Credits
29
Seminar Examination Committee shall consist of the concerned
Research Guide, Head of the Department and the Chairman, Board of
Studies. The candidate shall give a seminar on the research topic
emphasizing the importance of the problem, review of literature,
methodology and techniques to be adopted including interpretation of
data and the expected outcome. The seminar is open to all members of
the department.
In case of full-time scholars, Pre. Ph.D. Examination examinations
are to be conducted after 9 months and before one year from the
date of registration, while in case of part-time candidates the
examination is to be conducted after 18 months and before the
completion of 2nd year months from the date of registration. The date
of payment of fee at the time of admission will be treated as the date
of registration.
7.4 Evaluation of Ph.D. Course Work
The panel of paper setters and examiners for Papers-I, II & III should
be provided by the Chairperson, Board of Studies from the list
approved by Board of Studies.
Evaluation of the Papers-I, II & III of Part-I Course work shall be
double valuation with TWO External Examiners.
A Ph.D. scholar has to obtain a minimum of 55% of marks or its
equivalent grade in the UGC 7-point scale (or an equivalent grade/
CGPA in a point scale wherever grading system is followed) in the
course work in order to be eligible to continue in the programme and
submit the dissertation/thesis.
Candidates who fail in first attempt will be given only one other chance
to qualify in the examination. Registration for appearing for the
examination shall be considered as an attempt.
30
7.5 Exemption from Pre. Ph.D. Examination
Candidates already holding M. Phil. degree and admitted to the
Ph.D. programme, or those who have already completed the course work
in M.Phil. and have been permitted to proceed to the Ph.D. in integrated
course, may be exempted by the Department from the Ph.D. course work.
All other candidates admitted to the Ph.D. programme shall be required
to complete the Ph.D. course work prescribed by the Department.
7.6 Requirements for the award of Ph.D. Degree
The requirements for the award of a Ph.D. degree are –
a) Candidates should have been qualified in Pre-Ph.D. Examination.
b) Candidate should have been qualified in progress evaluation tests.
c) Prior to submission of final copy of thesis, the candidate should
make a presentation of the Ph.D. thesis work (Pre-Talk).
d) Candidate should have published at least two research papers in a
refereed Journal before the submission of the thesis for adjudication.
In addition, two paper presentations in conferences/seminars before
the submission of the dissertation/thesis for adjudication and produce
evidence for the same in the form of presentation certificates and/or
reprints. The journal publications must be in journals having impact
factor given by Thomson Reuters/Science Citation Index Journals/
UGC listed journals.
e) Candidate should submit a thesis based on the research work carried
out under the supervision of one or more recognized research guides
as per the University norms.
f) After receipt of positive recommendations on the presentation of
the thesis from adjudicators, the candidate should defend the thesis
in a viva-voce examination successfully before a committee appointed
by the Vice-Chancellor.
31
7.6.1 Pre-talk
33
c. Prior to submission, the thesis should be checked for plagiarism and a
Certificate of Plagiarism Check with Turnitin from the Coordinator,
Research Cell, should be obtained. Based on this a declaration of
plagiarism check (Annexure) from the Research Guide and the
Research student should be enclosed.
d. Prior to submission of the thesis 6 copies of the synopsis along with
soft copy should be submitted to the University.
e. On completing the research work, the candidate is required to submit
four copies of the thesis on the subject of his / her research. Out of
four copies at least one should be hard bound and others shall be of
soft bound.
f. A candidate may utilize for his/her thesis the contents of any work
which he/she may have already published on the subject. But he/she
shall not submit the whole or any substantial part of the work for
which a degree has been conferred on him/her by the University or
any other University.
g. The candidate shall enclose to his/her thesis, the printed contribution(s)
to the advancement of the subject which he/she has published
independently or jointly with others.
h. The thesis in all subjects shall be written and submitted only in English
except in language subjects where the candidate shall have the option
of writing the same either in English or in the language concerned.
Where the thesis is submitted in a Language other than English, a
detailed summary in English version of the thesis shall also be submitted.
i. Candidates working for Ph.D. in subjects such as Music, Fine Arts
and Theatre arts can write their thesis in English, Telugu or Hindi. If
the thesis is not written in English, a detailed summary in English should
accompany the thesis.
34
7.7 Evaluation of Ph.D. Thesis
35
7.7.1. Preparation of Panels of Examiners:
(a) The Adjudicators must be of a rank not lower than that of Associate
Professor of any University in the concerned discipline.
(b) Identical panels for different scholars submitting at the same time
under the same Research Supervisor are to be avoided.
(c) Identical panels for different scholars under various guides are to be
avoided.
(g) External guides should avoid including the names of their own
University colleagues.
36
years of service after being awarded Ph. D. as it is considered unethical
to appoint one’s own student as an examiner for his/her other
students.
(n) If the approved panel is not forwarded to the Office of the Coordinator,
Research Cell, Acharya Nagarjuna University within one month
(reported by the research supervisor concerned), the Coordinator,
Research Cell shall put up the matter to the Vice-Chancellor for further
course of action.
37
(o) The Research guides may contact examiners only to find out their
willingness to be included in the panels. However after submission of
the panel and the thesis, they should not contact the examiners regarding
adjudication which is confidential work.
The goals will have to be presented clearly, and the research scope
will be clearly defined, which indicates deep understanding of the topic. The
objectives will be set high but are attainable.
38
(ii) Command of the topic:
The works to be cited will be selected not only appropriately but
critically; the number of relevant works cited will be sufficient, consisting
primarily of high quality scientific publications (journals or other refereed fora).
The results will have to be evaluated in the light of the cited works and in that
of prior research and theories on the topic. In addition, the Research Scholar
has to demonstrate deep understanding of the research topic.
(iii) Methodology and conclusions:
The Scholar has to demonstrate command of the relevant research
methods, use appropriate and justified methods, report the research process
and the methods accurately and precisely and justify the choices made. The
reliability and transferability of the results will have to be evaluated thoroughly,
and the thesis may be based on exceptionally extensive empirical data/
analytical/simulated results. In addition, the line of reasoning behind the
conclusions shall be particularly clear, accurate and critical and proves that the
Scholar has gained a deep understanding of the topic of the research study.
The research results shall provide thorough answers to the posed research
questions.
(iv) Contribution to knowledge and thesis structure:
The results will meet the standards of international publications
and will be of interest to academia or industry or otherwise relevant to
professionals in the field. The Research Scholar has to work very independently
on the thesis, while the contributions of the Research Supervisor should
be minor.
(v) Presentation and language:
The appearance, presentation and language of the thesis should be
impeccable.
39
8.2. Style of Presentation of Thesis
The presentation of the Thesis is recommended to be in the following
order:
However, the Research Supervisor/Scholar is free to design his own
structure relevant to his subject.
Title page
Dedication/Acknowledgements
Declaration
Certificate from the Research Supervisor
Plagiarism compliance declaration (Annexure) signed both by the
Research Scholar and the Research Supervisor
Preface
Acknowledgements
Table of Contents
List of Tables/Graphs/Figures
Glossary of abbreviations
Contents of the Thesis
• Introduction
• Review of Literature
• Objectives of Research
• Materials and Methods
• Results
• Discussion
• Summary and Conclusions
• Suggestions
• Scope for further research
Bibliography
Webliography
Appendices*
* Copies of the reprint of the journals should be attached to the Thesis as an
appendix.
40
8.3 Guidelines for the preparation of Synopsis and Thesis
(i) Synopsis
(ii) Thesis
(b) Printing shall be in a standardized form on one side of the paper and in
1.5 spacing. In case the number of pages in the thesis (excluding the
initial pages) exceeds 250, the candidate should get it printed on both
sides of paper.
41
(c) A margin of 1.5 inches shall be on the left-hand side and one inch on
the right-hand side.
(d) The card used for cover shall not be more than 330 gsm.
(e) The title of the thesis, name of the University, Degree, Candidate
name, Research Supervisor name, place of research work, and the
month and year of submission shall be printed on the title page and the
front cover.
(f) Spine should mention Ph.D. thesis on the top, name of the candidate and
month and year.
(iii) Binding
1. ....... (Title)
2. ....... (Name of the Candidate)
3. ....... (Name of the Research Supervisor)
4. ...... (Name of the Department in which the thesis is being submitted)
5. ...... (Name of the Faculty in which the thesis is being submitted) (e.g.
Faculty of Natural Sciences)
6. University Emblem
7. Department and University Name
8. Month and Year of submission at the bottom
The name of the scholar appearing on the Thesis, Synopsis, etc.
must be the same as in his/her S.S.C. (X Class) Certificate.
Two plain blank papers should be provided at the beginning and
at the end.
42
The following pages should be included in the Thesis after Title Page.
• Declaration by the candidate to the effect that the thesis either in part
or full does not constitute any part of any thesis/ dissertation/ monograph
submitted by him/her or any other person to any University/ Institute.
The candidate shall be held responsible for the genuineness of his/her
work and any false statement shall lead to cancellation of his/her
registration/degree at any stage even after the declaration of result and
award of the degree.
• Certificate from the Research Supervisor to the effect that the thesis is
the bona fide work done by the candidate.
43
2. The fee particulars for plagiarism check in the form of DD in favour
of the Registrar, ANU as processing fee are as follows:
(v) Thesis submission form duly signed by the Research Supervisor, Head
of the Department and Principal concerned of the University College.
46
The Adjudicators are required to:
i. Outline the main features of the thesis.
ii. Critically evaluate the thesis and send a detailed report on the
thesis.
• The thesis attains the standard required for the award of the Ph.D.
degree
4. If the reports of all the examiners are favourable, the candidate shall
be permitted to take Viva-voce and he/she shall be awarded the Ph.
D degree on the recommendation of the Vive-voce committee.
5. If all the examiners reject the thesis, the registration of the candidate
stands cancelled.
8. If two of the examiners ask for revision and one examiner rejects the
thesis or one examiner asks for revision of the thesis and the remaining
two reject the thesis, the thesis shall be rejected.
9. In a nutshell, the following are the guidelines for taking further course
of action in recommending the thesis for the award of Ph.D. degree.
48
2. In cases where a foreign examiner is not fixed within 15 days from
the date of giving e-mail or has not sent the report within three months
from the date of dispatch of the thesis (by airmail), the Vice-Chancellor
may consider the change of the foreign examiner with another foreign
examiner.
49
3. The Head of the Department (all the concerned Heads, in the
case of interdisciplinary).
4. The Chairperson of the Board of Studies (all the concerned
chairpersons, in the case of inter-disciplinary)
5. One of the Indian examiners who adjudicated the thesis (to be
nominated by the Vice-Chancellor)
d) A quorum with 1/3 of the members is required. However, one of the
Indian Examiners must be present at the viva-voce examination. In
case the Viva Board has less than 3 members by virtue of a member
holding more than one position, the residual number of members so
required to constitute full Board will be nominated by the Vice-
Chancellor. The convener will fix the date and time of Viva-Voce
examination and intimate the same to all members with a copy to the
Co-ordinator, Research Cell, ANU.
e) Research guide shall be the Convener for viva-voce committee. In
case of Extramural candidate, the External Guide and for Part Time
candidate the Guide from the University will be the Convener of the
Viva-Voce Committee. Further wherever there is a co-guide, he will
also be a Member of the Committee.
f) In case the guide superannuates from the University service or is on
long leave/ deputation or cannot attend on any other valid reasons
the co-guide/ Chairperson will be the convener.
50
h) The Viva should be held within 6 months of intimation from the
Research Cell.
k) The Ph.D. degree shall be awarded only after uploading of the thesis
in INFLIBNET (Shodhganga).
51
CERTIFICATE
a) This is to certify that no corrections/suggestions were pointed out by the
Indian/ Foreign Adjudicator(s) in the Thesis titled “.................................
“submitted by Mr./Ms.
(OR)
b) This is to certify that all corrections and suggestions pointed out by the
Indian/ Foreign Adjudicator(s) are incorporated in the Thesis
titled................................................................................” submitted by
Mr./Ms...................................... ..... Research Supervisor.
9. SELF-SUBMISSION
Self-submission by the University Faculty for Ph.D. degree is
allowed for those having 10 years of teaching experience in the University
or its PG Centers as per the submission procedure state above, i.e.,
duration from the date of registration (part-time), publication of research
papers, seminar/conference presentations, plagiarism test, etc.
10. REVIEW OF STATUS PROCESS:
The status of evaluation process is to be informed to the scholar
and the guide periodically either by directly communicating to them or by
putting them in website.
11. FAILURE IN THE M. Phil./ Ph.D. EXAMINATION:
(i) M. Phil.
a) If the candidate does not secure minimum pass marks/credits at
Part I/Pre. Ph.D. Examination, even on second appearance.
52
(ii) M. Phil./Ph.D. .
If any one of the three adjudicators rejects the Thesis (any of the two
adjudicators, in case of M. Phil.), the Candidate is deemed to have failed in
the Examination. In such cases, the Candidate may re-register for the research
program, if he desires so within a period of one month. He/she shall be
permitted to submit the thesis after expiry of one year and not later than
2 years from the date of re-registration and upon payment of prescribed
fee. The thesis shall be evaluated by a fresh panel of adjudicators.
53
d) If he/she fails to submit dissertation/thesis even after the maximum
period.
e) If the candidate does not pass the Viva-Voce even during the second
attempt.
(i) They are exempted from appearing for entrance test and admissions
for them are made round the year.
(ii) Their admissions are based on their scores in the qualifying examination/
GPA Grade by establishing the equivalency.
(iv) Their date of reporting shall be the date of joining and annual tuition fee
payable is accounted from the date of joining.
(vi) They are allowed to appear for the next immediate Pre-Ph.D.
Examination after the date of joining, basing on their eligibility.
54
13. PROVISIONAL CERTIFICATE
c. Ph.D. degrees which are pursued either full time or part time will be
treated as degrees awarded through Regular Mode provided these
are in conformity with the existing Statutes/Byelaws/Ordinances etc.
of the degree awarding University. However, the Ph.D. acquired
under distance mode is not permitted to consider as Regular
Mode.
The University shall maintain the list of all the M.Phil. / Ph.D.
registered students on its website on year-wise basis. The list shall
include the name of the registered candidate, topic of his/her research,name
of his/her supervisor/co-supervisor, date of enrolment / registration.
55
16. DEPOSITORY WITH SHODHGANGA INFLIBNET
Following the successful completion of the evaluation process
and before the announcement of the award of the M.Phil./Ph.D. degree(s),
the Institution concerned shall submit an electronic copy of the M.Phil.
dissertation /Ph. D. thesis to the SHODHGANGA INFLIBNET, for
hosting the same so as to make it accessible to all Institutions/Colleges.
17. M.Phil./Ph.D. DEGREES AWARDED BY FOREIGN
UNIVERSITIES
If the M.Phil./Ph.D. degree is awarded by a Foreign University,
the Indian Institution considering such a degree shall refer the issue to a
Standing Committee constituted by the concerned institution for the
purpose of determining the equivalence of the degree awarded by the
foreign University.
18. UGC (MINIMUM STANDARDS AND PROCEDURE FOR
AWARD OF M.Phil./Ph.D DEGREE) REGULATIONS-2016
i. Women Candidates and Persons with Disability (more than 40%
disability) may be allowed a relaxation of one year for M. Phil, and
two years for Ph.D. In addition, women candidates may be
provided Maternity Leave/Child Care Leave once in the entire
duration of M.Phil./Ph.D. for up to 240 days.
ii. In case of relocation of an M.Phil./Ph.D. woman scholar due to
marriage or otherwise, research data shall be allowed to be transferred
to the University to which the scholar intends to relocate provided
a) all other conditions in these regulations are followed and b) the
research work does not pertain to a project secured by the parent
institution/supervisor from any funding agency. The scholar will
give credit to the parent guide and institution for the part of research
already done.
56
iii. Award of degrees to candidates registered for the M. Phil./ Ph.D.
program prior to July 11, 2009 shall be governed by the provisions
of the then existing Ordinance/Bylaws/ Regulations of the Institution
awarding the degrees and they shall be exempted from the
requirement of the minimum eligibility condition of National
Eligibility Test/State Level Eligibility Test/State Eligibility Test for
recruitment and appointment of Assistant Professor or equivalent
positions in Universities/Colleges/Institutions subject to the fulfillment
of the following conditions:
57
ANNEXURE
Declaration for Plagiarism Check
b. The work presented is original and own work of the author (i.e. there
is no plagiarism). No ideas, processes, results or words of others have
been presented as Authors own work.
e. The thesis has been checked using TURNITIN (copy of originality report
attached) and found within limits as per HEC Plagiarism Policy and
instructions issued from time to time.
________________________ __________________________
58