Scribd
Upload
477 views2 pages

Formal Offer of Evidence TADENA

This document is a comment on the prosecution's formal offer of evidence in the criminal case of People of the Philippines vs. Alex R. Tadena for violation of R.A. 9482. The accused's counsel objects to several of the prosecution's documentary exhibits, admitting some exist and are authentic but arguing they are misleading and do not prove the crime charged. The objections are made to medical certificates, sworn statements, photographs and other documents offered by the prosecution. The counsel requests the objections be considered when appreciating the prosecution's evidence.

Uploaded by

Ronbert Alindogan Ramos
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
477 views2 pages

Formal Offer of Evidence TADENA

This document is a comment on the prosecution's formal offer of evidence in the criminal case of People of the Philippines vs. Alex R. Tadena for violation of R.A. 9482. The accused's counsel objects to several of the prosecution's documentary exhibits, admitting some exist and are authentic but arguing they are misleading and do not prove the crime charged. The objections are made to medical certificates, sworn statements, photographs and other documents offered by the prosecution. The counsel requests the objections be considered when appreciating the prosecution's evidence.

Uploaded by

Ronbert Alindogan Ramos
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Republic of the Philippines

REGIONAL TRIAL COURT


Fifth Judicial Region
Branch 38
Daet, Camarines Norte

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES CRIMINAL CASE NO.19023


Complainant,

        - versus -

ALEX R. TADENA, FOR: VIOLATION OF R.A. 9482


Accused.
x------------------------------------------x

COMMENT ON PROSECUTION’S
FORMAL OFFER OF EVIDENCE
Accused, through counsel, respectfully manifests the following
comments/objections on the documentary exhibits offered by the prosecution;

EXHIBIT DOCUMENT OBJECTION/COMMENT


“A” and submarkings Medical Certificate of Admits the existence and
Sylvia Echano, dated authenticity but objects to
May 15, 2018, issued the purpose for which it
by the Camarines was offered for being
Norte Provincial misleading and it does
Hospital not prove the crime
charged.
“B” and submarkings Sworn Statement of The accused objects on
Sylvia Echano dated the ground that it is self-
May 28, 2018 serving.
“C” and submarkings Photograph of the dog The accused objects on
of the Complainant the ground that it is
misleading as the dog in
the picture is not the dog
of the accused.
“D” and submarkings Certificate to File Admits the existence and
Action dated May 11, authenticity.
2018
“E” and submarkings Microbiology Result, Admits the existence and
dated May 23, 2016; authenticity but objects to
issued by Leon the purpose for which it
Hernandez Hospital was offered for being
misleading and it does
not prove the crime

Page 1 of 2
charged.
“F” and submarkings Sworn Statement of The accused objects on
Edna F. Pitas, dated the ground that the
May 28, 2018 witness is bias, she
being the partner of
private complainant.

WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed that the foregoing


comments/objections be considered in the appreciation of the prosecution’s
documentary exhibits.
Daet, Camarines Norte, Philippines, July 8, 2020.

ATTY. RONBERT A. RAMOS


Counsel for the Accused
Subia Bldg., J. Lukban St.
Daet, Camarines Norte
ROLL No. 71268 – 06-06-18
PTR No. CN 4046089 / 11-26-19
IBP O.R. No. 096177 / 11-29-19
MCLE Compliance No. VI – 0022944
Contact Number: 09178425548
Email: [email protected]

Copy Furnished:

PROS. CORNELIO M. ROLL


Provincial Prosecution Office
Hall of Justice, Brgy. Camambugan,
Daet, Camarines Norte

Page 2 of 2

You might also like