Epr - Interpretation Introduction Proportionality Factor (G-Factor) Hyperfine Interactions Easyspin Simulations References Problems
Epr - Interpretation Introduction Proportionality Factor (G-Factor) Hyperfine Interactions Easyspin Simulations References Problems
Epr - Interpretation Introduction Proportionality Factor (G-Factor) Hyperfine Interactions Easyspin Simulations References Problems
EPR – Interpretation
Introduction
Hyperfine Interactions
EasySpin Simulations
References
Problems
EPR - Interpretation
Introduction
ΔE=gβB(1)(1)ΔE=gβB
where β is the constant, Bohr magneton. Since the energy absorbed by the
electron should be exactly the same with the state energy difference ΔE,
ΔE=hv ( h is Planck’s constant), the Equation 11 can be expressed as
hν=gβB(2)(2)hν=gβB
People can control the microwave frequency v and the magnetic field B. The
other factor, g, is a constant of proportionality, whose value is the property of
the electron in a certain environment. After plugging in the values of h and β
in Equation 22, g value can be given through Equation 33:
hν=gβ(Be+ΔB)(4)(4)hν=gβ(Be+ΔB)
since we only know the spectrometer value of B, the Equation 44 is written
as:
hν=(ge+Δg)βB](5)(5)hν=(ge+Δg)βB]
From the relationship shown above, we know that there are infinite pairs of v
and B that fit this relationship. The magnetic field for resonance is not a
unique “fingerprint” for the identification of a compound because spectra can
be acquired at different microwave frequencies. Then what is the fingerprint
of a molecule? It is Δg. This value contains the chemical information that lies
in the interaction between the electron and the electronic structure of the
molecule, one can simply take the value of g = g e+ Δg as a fingerprint of the
molecule. For organic radicals, the g value is very close to ge with values
ranging from 1.99-2.01. For example, the g value for •CH3 is 2.0026. For
transition metal complexes, the g value varies a lot because of the spin-orbit
coupling and zero-field splitting. Usually it ranges from 1.4-3.0, depending
on the geometry of the complex. For instance, the g value of Cu(acac)2 is
2.13. To determine the g value, we use the center of the signal. By using
Equation 33, we can calculate the g factor of the absorption in the spectrum.
The value of g factor is not only related to the electronic environment, but
also related to anisotropy. About this part, please refer to EPR:Theory,
Parallel Mode EPR: Theory and ENDOR:Theory. An example from UC
Davis is shown below[1] (Britt group, Published in J.A.C.S. ):
Figure 2. EPR
spectra of some proteins (WT mitoNEET, H87C mitoNEET, and ferredoxin).
Frequency is 30.89 GHz.1
Hyperfine Interactions
Table 1. Bio transition metal nuclear spins and EPR hyperfine patterns[3]
The rules for determining which nuclei will interact are the same as
for NMR. For isotopes which have even atomic and even mass numbers, the
ground state nuclear spin quantum number, I, is zero, and these isotopes have
no EPR (or NMR) spectra. For isotopes with odd atomic numbers and even
mass numbers, the values of I are integers. For example the spin of 2H is 1.
For isotopes with odd mass numbers, the values of I are fractions. For
example the spin of 1H is 1/2 and the spin of 23Na is 7/2. Here are more
examples from biological systems:
Table 2. Bio ligand atom nuclear spins and their EPR hyperfine patterns[3]
The number of lines from the hyperfine interaction can be determined by the
formula: 2NI + 1. N is the number of equivalent nuclei and I is the spin. For
example, an unpaired electron on a V4+ experiences I=7/2 from the vanadium
nucleus. We can see 8 lines from the EPR spectrum. When coupling to a
single nucleus, each line has the same intensity. When coupling to more than
one nucleus, the relative intensity of each line is determined by the number of
interacting nuclei. For the most common I=1/2 nuclei, the intensity of each
line follows Pascal's triangle, which is shown below:
Figure 3. Pascal's triangle
For example, for •CH3, the radical’s signal is split to 2NI+1= 2*3*1/2+1=4
lines, the ratio of each line’s intensity is 1:3:3:1. The spectrum looks like this:
The EPR spectra have very different line shapes and characteristics
depending on many factors, such as the interactions in the spin Hamiltonian,
physical phase of samples, dynamic properties of molecules. To gain the
information on structure and dynamics from experimental data, spectral
simulations are heavily relied. People use simulation to study the
dependencies of spectral features on the magnetic parameters, to predict the
information we may get from experiments, or to extract accurate parameter
from experimental spectra.
EasySpin Simulations
Many methods were developed to simulate the EPR spectra. Dr. Stefan Stoll
wrote EasySpin, a computational EPR package for spectral simulation.
EasySpin is based on Matlab, which is a numerical computing environment
and fourth-generation programming language. EasySpin is a powerful tool in
EPR spectral simulation. It can simulate spectra under many different
conditions. Some functions are shown below:
salt: ENDOR (solid state)