‫‪No.

F-13-AAA-0000‬‬

‫ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﻲ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ‬

‫ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ‬

‫ﻓﺮﺯﺍﺩ ﻭﺻﺎﻟﻲ**‬
‫ﺩﭘﺎﺭﺗﻤﺎﻥ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻲ ﻳﺮﺍﻕ ﺁﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﭘﻮﻳﺎ‬
‫ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ‪ ،‬ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ‬
‫‪[email protected]‬‬

‫ﻫﺎﺩﻱﻫﺎ ﻡ ﻱﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﭘﺪ ﻱﺩﻩ ﺭ ﻱﺯﺵ ﮔﺮﺩﺍﺑﻪ ﻓﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﻣﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻩ‬ ‫ﭼﻜﻴﺪﻩ — ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﺽ ﻭﺯﺵ ﺑﺎﺩ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ‬
‫ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪ)‪ 3-150 Hz (Frequency‬ﺍﺳﺖ ]‪ .[1‬ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﺎﺕ‬ ‫ﺩﻣﭙﺮﻫﺎﻱ ) ‪ (Stock Bridge Dampers‬ﻧﺼﺐﺷﺪﻩ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ‬
‫ﺍﺋﻮﻟﻴﻦ)‪ (Aeolian‬ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ ﺑﺲﻱﺍﺭ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺨﺖ‬
‫ﻱ ﻗﺎﺑﻞﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ‪،‬‬ ‫ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ ﻛﺮﻧﺶ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺗﻜﻴﻪﮔﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ‬
‫ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻝﻱﻝ ﺍ ﻱﺟﺎﺩ ﺧﺴﺘﮓﻱ ﻭ ﺧﺮﺍﺏﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺎﺩﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﻕ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺍ ﻱﻥ‬ ‫ﺫﻛﺮﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻳﻚ‬ ‫ﺗﻼﺵ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥﻫﺎﻱ‬
‫ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﺎﺕ ﺍﻫﻢﻱﺕ ﺑﺲﻱﺍﺭ ﺯ ﺍﻱﺩ ﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ‪ .‬ﺍ ﻱﻥ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﺎﺕ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺍ ﻱﺟﺎﺩ ﺧﻤﺶ ﺷﺪ ﺩ‬
‫ﻱ‬ ‫ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻭﺏ ﺧﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ‬
‫ﻱﻭﺳﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﻞ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﻫﺎﺩﻱﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻛﻞ ﻭ ﻓﻚ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﻡﻱﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻡ ﻱﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ‬
‫ﻭپ‬
‫ﻓﺮﻛﺎﻧﺴﻲ ) ‪ (Frequency Response‬ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ‬
‫ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺴﺘﮓﻱ ﻭ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﺯﻭﺩﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺍ ﻱﻥ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻦﻱﻥ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻋﻤﺮ‬
‫ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ‬ ‫ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻣﺪﻝ ﺩﻳﻨﺎﻣﻴﻜﻲ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﺎﺕ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ‬
‫ﻱ ﻫﺎﺩﻱﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻻﺕ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺷﻮﺩ‪.‬‬
‫ﻣﻒ‬
‫ﺩ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺖ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺧﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ‪ .‬ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ‬
‫ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﻃﺮﺍﺡ ﻱ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺑﺎ ﺿﺮ ﻱﺏ ﺍ ﻱﻣﻦﻱ ﺑﺎﻻ‪ ،‬ﺩﻭ ﺩ ﻱﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﺮﺍ ﻱ‬ ‫‪ 30‬ﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻓﺮﻛﺎﻧﺴﻲ‬ ‫ﺍﺯ ﺩﻣﭙﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ‬
‫ﻱ ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺍﻭﻝ‬
‫ﺑﺮﺭﺱﻱ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﺎﺕ ﺍﺋﻮﻝﻱﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﺩﻫﻪ ‪ 1980‬ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﮔﺮﺩ ﺩ‬ ‫ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﻝ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺑﺮ‬
‫ﻱ‬ ‫ﺳﻄﺢ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﺎﺕ ﺍﺋﻮﻝ ﻱﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺩﻫﺎﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﺍﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﻧﻪ ﺍﻧﺮژ‬
‫ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﺎ‬ ‫ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻲ ﻭ ﻧﺼﺐ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ‬
‫ﺗﻊﻳﻲﻥ ﻡﻱﺷﻮﺩ ]‪ .[5-2‬ﺩﺭ ﺍ ﻱﻥ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﻧﻪ‬
‫ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻛﻤﺎﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﺎﺕ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ‬
‫ﻡﻱﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﺮژ ﻱ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺑﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺮژ ﻱ ﻣﺴﺘﻬﻠﻚﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻡﻱﺭﺍ ﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞﻱ‬
‫ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻬﺎﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ‪.‬‬
‫ﻛﺎﺑﻞ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻦﻱﻥ ﺗﺠﻪﻱﺯﺍﺕ ﻡﻱﺭﺍ ﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺧﺎﺭﺝﻱ ) ‪Spacer Damper & Stock‬‬
‫‪ (Bridge Damper‬ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﻪ ﻡ ﻱﺷﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﺩ ﻱﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻥﻱﺭﻭ ﻱ ﺁ ﻱﺭﻭﺩ ﻱﻧﺎﻡﻱﻙﻱ‬ ‫ﻭﺍژﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻱ — ﺩﻣﭙﺮ؛ ﺧﺴﺘﮕﻲ؛ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ ﻛﺮﻧﺶ؛ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﻕ؛‬
‫ﻱ ﺗﺨﻢﻱﻥ ﺯﺩﻩﺷﺪﻩ‬
‫ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺑﺎﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺘﺎ ﻱﺝ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻝﻫﺎ ﻱ ﺗﺠﺮﺏ‬
‫ﻭ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺵﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﻪ ﻡ ﻱﮔﺮﺩﺩ‪ .‬ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍ ﻱﻥ ﺯﻡﻱﻧﻪ‬ ‫‪ .1‬ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ‬
‫]‪ .[9-6‬ﺩﻭ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﺘﺪﺍﻭﻝ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻴﺮﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ‬ ‫ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻣﺤﻘﻘﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‬
‫ﺳﻄﺢ‬ ‫ﺩﺭ ﻡ ﻱﺍﻥ ﭘﺪ ﻱﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﻱ ﺩ ﻱﻧﺎﻡﻱﻙﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺑﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻧﺮژﻱ ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺯﺵ ﺑﺎﺩ ‪ Spacer Damper‬ﻭ ‪Stock Bridge Damper‬‬
‫ﭘﺘﺎﻧﺴﻴﻞ ﺑﺎﻻ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﺎﺕ ﺍ ﻳﺠﺎﺩﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺟﺮ ﻱﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺩ‬
‫ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ‪ .‬ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﺭﻭﻱ ‪ Stock Bridge Damper‬ﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺗﻚ‬
‫ﻱﻙﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮ ﻳﻦ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺟﺮﻱﺍﻥﻫﺎ ﻱ ﺑﺎﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﭘﺎ ﻳﻲﻥ ) ‪ 1 m/s‬ﺗﺎ ‪m/s‬‬
‫‪Stock‬‬ ‫ﺑﺎﻧﺪﻝ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ‬
‫ﻱ( ﺩﺭ‬ ‫‪ (7‬ﺳﺒﺐ ﺍ ﻱﺟﺎﺩ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﺎﺕ ﺍﺋﻮﻝ ﻱﻥ )ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻋﻤﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖ ﻋﻤﻮﺩ‬
‫‪ Bridge Damper‬ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻄﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﺫﺏ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ‬

‫ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻳﺮﺍﻕ ﺁﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﭘﻮﻳﺎ‬

 ‫ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﻲ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ‬

‫ﺑﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻫﺸﺘﻤﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺑﺮﻕ – ‪ 1392‬ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ‪ ،‬ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ‬

‫‌ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﻱ‬ ‫ﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﭼﻪ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ‪ ،‬ﻣﻲ‬

‫‪.2‬ﻣﺪﻝ ﺩﻳﻨﺎﻣﻴﻜﻲ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ‬
‫ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪﻱ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﺎﺕ ﺧﻂ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻬﺎﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ‪ .‬ﺍﻳﻦ‬
‫ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺗﺤﻞﻱﻝ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﺎﺕ ﺍﺋﻮﻝﻱﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺎﺩﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﻧﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ‬ ‫ﻗﻄﻌﻪ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻً ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻚ ﻧﮕﻬﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﻢ‪ ،‬ﻛﺎﺑﻞ ﻧﮕﻬﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪﻩ‬
‫ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﻱﻙ ﻣﺪﻝ ﺭ ﻱﺍﺽﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﻧﻪ ﺍﻧﺮژ ﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻫﺎﮔﺪﻭﺭﻥ ﻭ‬ ‫)‪ (Messenger Cable‬ﻭ ﻭﺯﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺷﻜﻞ ‪ 1‬ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ‬
‫ﻱ‬
‫ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻧﺶ ]‪ [14-12‬ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﺍﻱﻥ ﻣﺪﻝ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺒﻨﺎ ﻱ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺳﺨﺖ‬ ‫ﻗﻄﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ‪.‬‬
‫ﺩﻱﻧﺎﻡﻱﻙﻱ ) ‪ (Dynamic Stiffness Method‬ﺍﺳﺖ‪ ،‬ﻫﺎﺩﻱﻫﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺗﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻱ‬ ‫ﻓﻚ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﻢ‬
‫ﻛﺶﻱﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻣﺪﻝ ﻡ ﻱﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﻣﻮﺝ ﺷﺐﻳﻪﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻡﻱﺷﻮﻧﺪ‪.‬‬ ‫ﻭﺯﻧﻪﻫﺎ‬
‫ﺩﺭ ﺍ ﻱﻥ ﻣﺪﻝ ﻓﺮﺽ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﺎﺕ ﻫﺎﺩﻱ ﻫﺎﺭﻣﻮﻥﻱﻙ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻣﭙﺮﻫﺎ‬
‫ﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻱﻙ ﺱﻱﺳﺘﻢ ﺩ ﻱﻧﺎﻡﻱﻙﻱ ﭼﺎﻩ ﺍﻧﺮژﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺎﺩﻱ‬
‫ﻥﺯ‬
‫ﻣﺪﻝﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻡﻱﺷﻮﻧﺪ‪.‬‬
‫ﻛﺎﺑﻞ ﻧﮕﻬﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪﻩ‬
‫ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﻧﺼﺐ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ‬
‫ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻧﺼﺐ ﺩﻣﭙﺮﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺩﻛﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻧﺼﺐ ﺩﻣﭙﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ‬
‫ﺷﻜﻞ ‪ :1‬ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ) ‪(Stock Bridge Damper‬‬
‫ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻮﺩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻫﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﻩ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪﻱ‬
‫‪ 30‬ﺳﺎﻝ ﻋﻤﺮﻭ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻲ‬ ‫ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ‬
‫ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺩ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﺪ‪ ،‬ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﮔﺮﻩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﮕﻴﺮﺩ‪ .‬ﻣﺤﻞ‬
‫‌ﻛﻨﺪ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ‬ ‫ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﻲ‬
‫ﻧﺼﺐ ﺑﻬﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﺹ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﻭ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻂ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﺎﺕ ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺯﺵ ﺑﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻤﻜﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﺧﺴﺘﮕﻲ‬
‫ﺷﻮﺩ ]‪ .[10‬ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﺧﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﺷﻜﺴﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺭﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ‬
‫ﻫﺎﺩﻱ‬
‫‌‬ ‫‪ .2.1‬ﻣﺪﻝﺳﺎﺯﻱ‬
‫‪Stock‬‬ ‫ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻭﺏ ﺑﻠﻨﺪﻣﺪﺕ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﻪ ﺯﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺗﺮﻙ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ‪.‬‬
‫ﺩﺭ ﺍ ﻱﻥ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺤﻞﻱﻝ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻝﺳﺎﺯ ﻱ ﻱﻙ ﻫﺎﺩﻱ ﺗﻚ ﺑﺎﻧﺪﻝ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ‬ ‫‪ Bridge Damper‬ﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﺹ‬
‫ﻡﻱﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﻞ ‪ 2‬ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﺍ ﻱﻥ ﺱﻱﺳﺘﻢ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ‪ n‬ﺩﻣﭙﺮ‪،‬‬ ‫ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﺎﺕ ﺧﻂ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﻨﺪ‪ .‬ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ‬
‫ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻫﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﺘﺼﻞ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ‪ .‬ﺍ ﻱﻥ ﺩﻣﭙﺮﻫﺎ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺩﻫﺎﻧﻪ ‪ L‬ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ‬ ‫ﺗﺄﺙ ﺧﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ‬
‫ﺟﻬﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ‪ IEC‬ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺳﻲ ﻳﺮ‬
‫ﻱ ﺩﻫﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻃﻮﻝﻫﺎﻱ ‪ ∆ n+1 ،  ، ∆ 2 ، ∆1‬ﺗﻘﺲﻡ‬
‫ﻱ ﻡﻱﻛﻨﻨﺪ‪.‬‬ ‫‪ n +1‬ﺯ ﺭ‬ ‫ﺧﻮﺍﺹ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﻲ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺪﻝ‬
‫ﻓﺮﺽ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺍ ﻱ ﻗﻄﺮ ‪ ، D‬ﺳﻄﺢ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ‪ A‬ﻭ ﻣﻤﺎﻥ ﺍ ﻱﻧﺮﺱﻱ‬ ‫ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ‬ ‫ﺩﻳﻨﺎﻣﻴﻜﻲ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺳﻲ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﺎﺕ ﺧﻂ ﻭ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ‬
‫‪ I‬ﺑﺎﺵﻥﺩ‪ .‬ﭼﮕﺎﻝﻱ ﻫﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ‪ ρ‬ﻭ ﻣﺪﻭﻝ ﺍﻻﺳﺖﻱﺱﻱﺗﻪ ﺁﻥ ‪ E‬ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺍﺯ‬ ‫ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﻧﻮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺧﻂ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﻝ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ‬
‫ﺷﻜﻢ ﺳﻴﻢ )‪ (Sag‬ﻛﺎﻧﺪﺍﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ‬ ‫ﺁﻧﺠﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻝ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ‬ ‫ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﺎﺕ ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺳﭙﺲ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺑﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻥﻱﺭﻭ ﻛﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ )ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ‪ 3‬ﺗﺎ ‪ 4‬ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺩﻫﺎﻧﻪ(‪ ،‬ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍ ﻱﻥ ﻡﻱﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ‬ ‫‪ [11] IEC 61897‬ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺧﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ‬ ‫ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ‬
‫ﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺻﺮﻑﻧﻈﺮ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺷﻜﻞ ‪ 2‬ﻧﺸﺎﻥﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ‬
‫ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﺎﺕ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ ﻛﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻜﻢ ﺍﻭﻝﻩ‬ ‫ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪﺷﺪﻩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ‬ ‫ﻡﻱﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺠﺪﺩﺍً ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﻝ ﺩﻳﻨﺎﻣﻴﻜﻲ‬
‫ﻳﻚ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺩﻫﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ‪ 3‬ﺯﻳﺮ ﺩﻫﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻂ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺧﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ‬
‫ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺪﺕ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ‪ 40‬ﺳﺎﻝ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺧﻂ ﻧﺼﺐ‬
‫ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻗﺎﺑﻠﻴﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻴﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﺳﻨﺠﻴﺪﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ‪.‬‬

‫ﺷﻜﻞ ‪ :2‬ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺩﻭ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ‬

‫‪2‬‬
 ‫ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﻲ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ‬

‫ﺑﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻫﺸﺘﻤﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺑﺮﻕ – ‪ 1392‬ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ‪ ،‬ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ‬

‫ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﺎﺕ ﻋﺮﺽﻱ ﻫﺎﺩﻱﻫﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﻣﻮﺝ ﻣﺪﻝﺳﺎﺯ ﻱ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ‬

‫ﻱ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪.‬‬
‫ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺯ ﺭ‬

‫= ) ‪ρ Avj ,k ( x j , t ) − Tv′′j ,k ( x j , t‬‬

‫=‪0 , j‬‬
‫‪1 n + 1‬‬ ‫)‪(1‬‬

‫ﺣﺴﮕﺮ‬
‫ﺷﺘﺎﺏ ﺳﻨﺞ‬ ‫= ) ‪ρ Avj ,k ( x j , t ) − Tv′′j ,k ( x j , t‬‬
‫=‪0 , j‬‬
‫‪1 n + 1‬‬ ‫)‪(2‬‬
‫ﺣﺴﮕﺮﻫﺎﻱ‬
‫ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﺳﻨﺞ‬ ‫ﻱ ﺩﻫﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺪ ﻱﺱ ‪ k‬ﻧﺸﺎﻥﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ‬
‫ﺍﻧﺪﻱﺱ ‪ j‬ﻧﺸﺎﻥﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺯ ﺭ‬
‫ﻱﺍﻧﮕﺮ ﻡﻱﺯﺍﻥ ﻛﺸﺶ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺎﺩﻱﻫﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ‪.‬‬
‫ﻱﺏ‬ ‫ﻫﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﻫﻤﭽﻦﻱﻥ ‪ T‬ﻥﺯ‬
‫ﺷﻜﻞ‪ :3‬ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺍﻳﻨﺪ ﺍﺧﺬ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻓﺮﻛﺎﻧﺴﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ‬
‫ﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﺕﻱﺏ ﺏﻱﺍﻧﮕﺮ ﻡ ﻱﺯﺍﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻫﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖﻫﺎ ﻱ ﺍﻓﻘﻲ ﻭ‬
‫‪ v‬ﻭ ‪ w‬ﻥﺯ‬
‫ﻫﺎﺭﻣﻮﻧﻴﻚ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ‪ 0/1‬ﻣﺘﺮ ﺑﺮ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻚ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ‬
‫ﻋﻤﻮﺩﻱ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ‪ .‬ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻣﺮﺯﻱ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ )‪ (2‬ﺍﺳﺖ‪.‬‬
‫ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩگﻳﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ‬
‫ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻓﺮﻛﺎﻧﺴﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻳﺪ‪ .‬ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺮﺥ‬
‫‪vn +1,k (∆ n +1 , t ) = wn +1,k (∆ n +1 , t ) = 0‬‬ ‫=‪v‬‬ ‫=‪w‬‬ ‫) ‪0 (2‬‬
‫ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ‪ 0/5‬ﻫﺮﺗﺰ ﺑﺮ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﻪ ﺭﺥ ﺩﻫﺪ‪ .‬ﺍﺯ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺑﻴﺸﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ‬ ‫&‬ ‫) ‪1, k (0, t‬‬ ‫) ‪1, k (0, t‬‬

‫ﻳﺸﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ؛ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻣﭙﺪﺍﻧﺲ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﻜﻲ � ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﻪ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ �‪.‬‬

‫ﺗﻨﺎﻭﺏ ﺑﺮ ﺏ‬
‫ﻣﺪﻝ ﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ‬ ‫‪.2.2‬‬
‫‪P‬‬ ‫‪P2F‬‬ ‫‪P‬‬ ‫‪P1F‬‬

‫ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻓﺎﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﮕﻨﺎﻝ ﻣﻘﺪﻭﺭ‬
‫ﻣﺪﻝ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺩﻭ ﺗﻴﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺮ گﻳﺮ ﺩﺍﺭ ﻣﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻚ ﺩﺭ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪ ﻣﻴﺮﺍ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺯﻳﺮ‬
‫ﻍﻳﺮﻣﺘﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ‪.‬‬ ‫ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﻫﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻴﺮﻫﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺮﻡ‬
‫ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ]‪.[11‬‬
‫ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪ ﻣﻴﺮﺍ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺮﻡ‬

‫)‪P = 0.5×F×V×cos(φ‬‬ ‫)‪(1‬‬ ‫ﻭﺯﻧﻪﻫﺎ‪ ،‬ﻃﻮﻝ ﻛﺎﺑﻞ ﻧﮕﻬﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﺮﺳﻲ ﻭﺯﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ‪ .‬ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ‬
‫ﺩﻗﺖ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﻝﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ‪ ،‬ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﻣﺪﻝ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ‪ ،‬ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻓﺮﻛﺎﻧﺴﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ‬
‫ﻳﺸﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ‬
‫ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ‪ P‬ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺣﺴﺐ ﻭﺍﺕ‪ F ،‬ﺏ‬ ‫ﻛﺪ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻓﺮﻛﺎﻧﺴﻲ ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻓﺎﺯ ﺑﺮ‬
‫ﺑﺮ ﺣﺴﺐ ﻧﻴﻮﺗﻮﻥ‪ V ،‬ﺑﻴﺸﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺣﺴﺐ ﻣﺘﺮ ﺑﺮ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﻪ ﻭ ‪ φ‬ﻧﻴﺰ‬ ‫ﺣﺴﺐ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪ ﺍﻣﭙﺪﺍﻧﺲ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺣﺴﺐ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﻓﺮﺍﻳﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺮﺍﺝ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ‬
‫ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻓﺎﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺳﻴﮕﻨﺎﻝ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ‬ ‫ﻓﺮﻛﺎﻧﺴﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺩﺭ ]‪ [11‬ﺷﺮﺡ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺮﺍﺝ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻓﺮﻛﺎﻧﺴﻲ ﺩﺭ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ‪-‬ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻣﭙﺪﺍﻧﺲ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻓﺎﺯ‬ ‫ﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺨﺖﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﺮﻡﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ‬
‫ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻝ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﮕﺮ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻗﺎﺑﻞﺟﺬﺏ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ ،‬ﺑﻪ‬ ‫ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ‪ .‬ﺷﻜﻞ ‪ 3‬ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺑﺴﺘﻪﺷﺪﻩ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻟﺮﺯﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩ � ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺮﺍﺝ‬
‫‪P‬‬ ‫‪P0F‬‬

‫ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ ﻛﻨﺪ‪ .‬ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺵ ﺳﻴﮕﻨﺎﻝ‬ ‫ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻓﺮﻛﺎﻧﺴﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ‪.‬‬
‫�‬
‫ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺮﻡﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﻟﺐ ﻭﻳﻮ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ‬
‫‪P‬‬ ‫‪P3F‬‬

‫ﻓﺮﻛﺎﻧﺴﻲ )ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻓﺮﻛﺎﻧﺴﻲ ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ‪-‬‬
‫ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ( ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﻞ ‪ 4‬ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺖ‪.‬‬

‫‪2‬‬
‫‪Mechanical Impedance‬‬
‫� ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺑﺮ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﻪ ﺍﻣﭙﺪﺍﻧﺲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻳﻜﻲ‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪4‬‬
‫‪LabVIEW‬‬ ‫‪Shaker‬‬

‫‪3‬‬
 ‫ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﻲ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ‬

‫ﺑﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻫﺸﺘﻤﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺑﺮﻕ – ‪ 1392‬ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ‪ ،‬ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ‬

‫‪1.5‬‬
‫‪new damper‬‬

‫‪1‬‬

‫)‪Poewr(watt‬‬
‫‪0.5‬‬

‫‪0‬‬
‫‪0‬‬ ‫‪20‬‬ ‫‪40‬‬ ‫‪60‬‬ ‫‪80‬‬ ‫‪100‬‬ ‫‪120‬‬
‫)‪Frequency (Hz‬‬

‫ﺷﻜﻞ‪ :4‬ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻓﺮﻛﺎﻧﺴﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ‬

‫ﺷﻜﻞ‪ :5‬ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ ﻛﺮﻧﺶ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻜﻴﻪﮔﺎﻩ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻂ ﻭ‬
‫ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻓﺮﻛﺎﻧﺴﻲ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺸﺨﺼﻪ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺪ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ‬
‫ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻲ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ‬
‫ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ‪.‬‬
‫ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ‬
‫ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﻤﺘﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻴﺮﺍ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ‬
‫‪ .2.3‬ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ‬
‫ﻭﺯﺵ ﺑﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ‪ ،‬ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕ‬
‫ﺑﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻓﺮﻛﺎﻧﺴﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺪ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺍﻧﺮژﻱ‬
‫ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺮﻱ ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﺎﺕ ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﻣﺮﺝ] ‪[15‬‬
‫ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺨﻤﻴﻦ ﺯﺩ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻛﺪ ﺑﺎ‬
‫ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻗﻄﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻂ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ‪5‬‬
‫ﺳﻌﻲ ﻭ ﺧﻄﺎ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻥﻗﺪﺭ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻧﺮژﻱ ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺯﺵ ﺑﺎﺩ ﺑﺎ‬
‫ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ ﻛﺮﻧﺶ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺪ ﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻧﺮژﻱ ﺗﻠﻒﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﻭ ﺧﻂ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ‪ .‬ﺍﻧﺮژﻱ ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺯﺵ ﺑﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﻚ‬
‫ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﭼﻪ ‪1‬ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ ﻛﺮﻧﺸﻲ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻭ ﻧﻴﻢ‬
‫ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻲ ﺫﻛﺮﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ]‪ [14‬ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﻫﻤﭽﻦﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺮژﻱ‬
‫ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺣﺪ ﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ‬
‫ﺗﻠﻒﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻫﻲ ]‪ [3‬ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ‪.‬‬
‫ﻛﺮﻧﺶ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺣﺪ ﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ‪ ،‬ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻗﻄﻌﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ‬
‫�‬
‫ﻧﻴﺴﺖ‪ .‬ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻲ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﻞ ‪ 5‬ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ‬ ‫‪OPGW‬‬
‫‪P‬‬ ‫‪P4F‬‬ ‫ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻫﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﻝ ‪ 400‬ﻣﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﻢ‬
‫ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺣﺪ ﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﻧﺶ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻫﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﻫﺎﺩﻱﻫﺎ‬ ‫‪ Ø12‬ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﺑﺎﺩ ‪ 1‬ﺍﻟﻲ ‪ 7‬ﻣﺘﺮ ﺑﺮ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ‬
‫ﺑﻴﻦ ‪ 75‬ﺗﺎ ‪ 100‬ﻣﻴﻜﺮﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﻳﻦ )ﺗﻚ ﻗﻠﻪ( ﺍﺳﺖ‪.‬‬ ‫‪20‬‬ ‫ﺷﻴﺐ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺻﻔﺮ ﻓﺮﺽ ﺷﺪﻩ‪ .‬ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻛﺸﺶ ﻫﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺑﺎ‬
‫ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺣﺪ ﺩﻭﺍﻡ ﺁﻥ ﻓﺮﺽ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﺎﺕ ﺧﻂ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪ‬
‫‪ .2.4‬ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺧﺴﺘﮕﻲ‬ ‫‪ ،4‬ﻣﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﺷﻜﻞ ‪5‬‬ ‫ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻓﺮﻛﺎﻧﺴﻲ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺷﻜﻞ‬
‫ﺗﺄﺙ ﺧﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﺩﻣﭙﺮﻫﺎ‬
‫ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺷﺪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻳﺮ‬ ‫ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪.‬‬
‫ﺭﻭﻱ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﻲ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻳﻚ‬
‫ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻂ ﻣﻮﺭﺩﻱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺳﭙﺲ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺧﺴﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ‬
‫ﻭ ﻣﺠﺪﺩ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻂ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ‪ .‬ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ‪3‬‬
‫ﻋﺪﺩ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺧﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ‬
‫ﻓﺮﻛﺎﻧﺴﻲ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﻞ ‪ 6‬ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﺳﺦﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻛﺎﻧﺴﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ‬
‫ﺩﻣﭙﺮﻫﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻣﻮﻥ ﺧﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪.‬‬

‫�ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻴﺮﺍﻳﻲ )‪ (Self Damping‬ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﻢ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺑﺮ ‪ IEEE 661‬ﺩﺭ ﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺖ‬

‫‪4‬‬
 ‫ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﻲ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ‬

‫ﺑﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻫﺸﺘﻤﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺑﺮﻕ – ‪ 1392‬ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ‪ ،‬ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ‬

‫ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ‪ ،‬ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺩﻩ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺳﻴﻜﻞ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪ‬

‫‪1.6‬‬
‫‪new damper‬‬
‫‪1.4‬‬ ‫‪after 10e6 cycle‬‬

‫ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﻭﺍﻗﻊﻱ ﻭﺯﺵ ﺑﺎﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﻋﺖﻫﺎ‬ ‫‪1.2‬‬

‫ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﻊ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻮﺳﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ‬

‫)‪Poewr(watt‬‬
‫‪1‬‬

‫‪0.8‬‬

‫ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻴﺮﺍ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ‬ ‫‪0.6‬‬

‫ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺮﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺍﺟﺰﺍ ﻡﻳﺮﺍ ﺳﺎﺯ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ؛ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ‬ ‫‪0.4‬‬

‫‪0.2‬‬
‫ﺁﺱﻳﺐﺩﻳﺪﮔﻲ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺩﺭ‬ ‫ﻃﻮﻝ ‪ 10‬ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺳﻴﻜﻞ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺁﺳﻴﺐ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ‬ ‫‪0‬‬
‫‪0‬‬ ‫‪20‬‬ ‫‪40‬‬ ‫‪60‬‬ ‫‪80‬‬ ‫‪100‬‬ ‫‪120‬‬

‫]‪ [11‬ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ‬ ‫ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﻢ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﻨﺎﺩ‬ ‫)‪Frequency (Hz‬‬

‫ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﻠﻒﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ‬ ‫ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ‬
‫‪s85‬‬
‫‪1.8‬‬
‫ﺗﺸﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺧﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ‪ 20‬ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ‬ ‫‪1.6‬‬
‫‪new damper‬‬
‫‪after 10e6 cycle‬‬

‫ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺧﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ‪ .‬ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ‬ ‫‪1.4‬‬

‫‪1.2‬‬

‫)‪Poewr(watt‬‬
‫ﺳﻴﻜﻞ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﺹ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﻲ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ‪ .‬ﺑﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ‬ ‫‪1‬‬

‫ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻓﺮﻛﺎﻧﺴﻲ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺧﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ‬
‫‪0.8‬‬

‫‪0.6‬‬

‫ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﺎً ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻗﺎﺑﻞﺟﺬﺏ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺩﺭ‬ ‫‪0.4‬‬

‫‪0.2‬‬
‫ﻣﺠﺎﻭﺭﺕ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪.‬‬ ‫‪0‬‬
‫‪0‬‬ ‫‪20‬‬ ‫‪40‬‬ ‫‪60‬‬ ‫‪80‬‬ ‫‪100‬‬ ‫‪120‬‬
‫)‪Frequency (Hz‬‬
‫ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ‪ 40‬ﺳﺎﻝ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺧﻂ ﻧﻮﺳﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻫﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ‬
‫ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ‬
‫ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻓﺮﻛﺎﻧﺴﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ‬ ‫‪1.5‬‬
‫‪new damper‬‬

‫ﻳﺮ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﻱ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻓﺮﻛﺎﻧﺴﻲ‬

‫ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺗﺄﺙ‬ ‫‪after 10e6 cycle‬‬

‫‪ 7‬ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ‬ ‫ﺩﻣﭙﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ‪ .‬ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻓﺮﻛﺎﻧﺴﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﻞ‬ ‫‪1‬‬
‫)‪Poewr(watt‬‬

‫ﺍﺳﺖ‪.‬‬
‫‪0.5‬‬

‫‪5‬‬

‫‪4‬‬ ‫‪0‬‬
‫)‪Power Dissipated(watt‬‬

‫‪0‬‬ ‫‪20‬‬ ‫‪40‬‬ ‫‪60‬‬ ‫‪80‬‬ ‫‪100‬‬ ‫‪120‬‬

‫)‪Frequency (Hz‬‬
‫‪3‬‬
‫ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺳﻮﻡ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺷﻜﻞ‪ :6‬ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻓﺮﻛﺎﻧﺴﻲ ﺳﻪ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺧﺴﺘﮕﻲ‬
‫‪1‬‬ ‫ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺧﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ]‪ [11‬ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ‬
‫‪0‬‬ ‫ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﺎﺭ‬
‫‪10‬‬ ‫‪20‬‬ ‫‪30‬‬ ‫‪40‬‬ ‫‪50‬‬ ‫‪60‬‬ ‫‪70‬‬ ‫‪80‬‬ ‫‪90‬‬ ‫‪100‬‬
‫)‪Frequency(Hz‬‬
‫ﻧﻮﺳﺎﻧﻲ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺗﺤﺖ ‪ 10‬ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﭼﺮﺧﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ‪ .‬ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ‬
‫ﺷﻜﻞ‪ :7‬ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻓﺮﻛﺎﻧﺴﻲ ﺩﻣﭙﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ‪ 40‬ﺳﺎﻝ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‬ ‫ﻳﺸﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪ ﺗﺸﺪﻳﺪ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ‪.‬‬
‫ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ‪ 0/5‬ﻡﻳﻠﻲﻣﺘﺮ ﻭ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺏ‬
‫ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻗﺎﺑﻞﺟﺬﺏ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ‬ ‫ﺑﻴﺸﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪ ﺗﺸﺪﻳﺪ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺑﺮ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻓﺮﻛﺎﻧﺴﻲ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺮﺍﺝ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ‪.‬‬
‫ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﺎً ﻛﺎﺳﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺠﺎﻭﺭ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ‬ ‫ﻫﺮ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﺑﻴﺸﻴﻨﻪ ﻧﺴﺒﻲ ﻣﻠﻤﻮﺱ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻓﺮﻛﺎﻧﺴﻲ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻭ‬
‫ﺗﺸﺪﻳﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻗﺎﺑﻠﻴﺖ ﻡﻳﺮﺍ ﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ‪.‬‬ ‫ﻳﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺗﺸﺪﻳﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ‪ .‬ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ‬
‫ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ‪ 1‬ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ‬ ‫ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﻴﺸﻴﻨﻪ ﻧﺴﺒﻲ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻓﺮﻛﺎﻧﺴﻲ )ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪ( ﺑﺎﺷﺪ‪.‬‬
‫ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺧﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺧﻂ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ‬

‫‪5‬‬
 ‫ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﻲ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ‬

‫ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ‬،‫ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ‬1392 – ‫ﺑﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻫﺸﺘﻤﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺑﺮﻕ‬

‫ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺧﻂ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻓﺮﻛﺎﻧﺴﻲ‬40 ‫ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ‬ ‫[ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ‬15] ‫ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭ ﺫﻛﺮﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ‬.‫ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ‬
‫ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ‬.‫ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﻝ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‬ ‫ ﺣﺪ ﻛﺮﻧﺶ ﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﻢ ﺩﺭ‬،‫ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﺪ‬OPGW ‫ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﻢ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ‬
‫ﻃﺮﺍﺣﺎﻥ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻂ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺧﺴﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺧﻂ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ‬ ‫ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﻢ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺁﺳﻴﺐ ﻧﺪﻳﺪﻥ ﺗﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ‬.‫ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‬
‫ ﺳﺎﻝ‬30 ‫ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ‬.‫ﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺁﺳﻴﺐ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ‬ ‫ﻣﻼﻙ ﻧﻤﻲﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻓﻴﺒﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻮﺭﻱ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺣﺪ ﺑﺎﻻﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺮﻧﺶ ﺭﺍ‬
‫ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺧﻂ ﺣﺘﻤﺎً ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻓﺮﻛﺎﻧﺴﻲ ﺁﻥ‬ ‫ ﻣﻴﻜﺮﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ‬10 ‫ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺣﺪ ﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﻧﺶ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺑﺎ‬.‫ﻣﺘﺤﻤﻞ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺮﺍﺝ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺤﺖ ﻭ ﺳﻼﻣﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻃﻤﻴﻨﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ‬ .‫ﺗﺎﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺳﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‬
.‫ﻟﺰﻭﻡ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﻧﻮ ﺟﺎﻱﮔﺰﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ‬

20 μs ‫ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ‬

15μs ‫ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ‬

10μs ‫ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ‬

‫ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻓﺮﻛﺎﻧﺲﻫﺎﻱ‬

‫ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻓﺮﻛﺎﻧﺲﻫﺎﻱ‬

‫ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻓﺮﻛﺎﻧﺲﻫﺎﻱ‬
‫ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ‬
‫ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ‬
[1] Blevins, R.D., 1990, Flow-Induced Vibrations, 2nd ed, New York: Van
Nostrand Reinhold.
[2] Claren, R. and G. Diana, 1969, Mathematical Analysis of Transmission
Line Vibration, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems,
PAS-88(12), pp. 1741-1771.
32/8 37 47/7 ‫ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ‬
[3] Hagedorn, P., 1982, On the Computation of Damped Wind-Excited
Vibrations of Overhead Transmission Lines, Journal of Sound and 1/3 1/3 8/4 1 ‫ﺩﻣﭙﺮ‬
Vibration, 83(2), pp. 253-271.
[4] Wolf, H., B. Adum, D. Semenski, and D. Pustaic, 2008, Using the 1/3 1/3 15/3 2 ‫ﺩﻣﭙﺮ‬
Energy Balance Method in Estimation of Overhead Transmission Line
Aeolian Vibrations, Strojarstvo, 50(5), pp. 269-276.
[5] Verma, H. and P. Hagedorn, 2005, Wind Induced Vibrations of Long
0/2 0/2 8/2 3 ‫ﺩﻣﭙﺮ‬
Electrical Overhead Transmission Line Spans: a Modified Approach,
Wind and Structures, 8(2), pp. 89-106. 1/5 1/5 22/1 1 ‫ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺧﺴﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ‬
[6] Hartlen, R. and I. Currie, 1970, Lift Oscillator Model for Vortex-
Induced Vibrations, Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division,
96(5), pp. 577-591.
1/3 1/5 26/7 2 ‫ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺧﺴﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ‬
[7] Skop, R.A. and O.M. Griffin, 1975, On a Theory for the Vortex Excited
Oscillations of Flexible Cylindrical Structures., Journal of Sound and 0/8 0/8 19/5 3 ‫ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺧﺴﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ‬
Vibration, 41, pp. 263-274.
[8] Iwan, W.D., 1975, The Vortex Induced Oscillations of Elastic Structural 18/2 18/7 30/2 ‫ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩﻩ‬40 ‫ﺩﻣﭙﺮ‬
Elements, Journal of Engineering for Industry, 97, pp. 1378-1382.
[9] Farquharson, F.B. and R.E. McHugh, 1956, Wind Tunnel Investigation
of Conductor Vibration Using Rigid Models, AIEE Bimonthly ‫ﻋﻤﻮﻣﺎً ﺧﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﺩﻣﭙﺮﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ‬ ‫ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ‬
Publication, Power Apparatus and Systems, 75, pp. 871-877.
[10] Ralph I. Stephens, Ali Fatemi, Robert R. Stephens, Henry O. Fuchs, ‫ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ‬1 ‫ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ‬.‫ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻂ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ‬
2004, Metal Fatigue in Engineering, 2end Ed, Wiely
‫ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺧﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪﺷﺪﻩ‬،7 ‫ ﻭ‬6 ‫ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﺍﺭﻫﺎ ﺷﻜﻞ‬
[11] IEC, 1998,Overhead lines-Requirements and tests for
Stockbridge dampers, TC 7- Overhead lines, 61897 ‫ﻳﻪﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ‬
‫ﺷﺐ‬ ‫ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﻤﻲ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﺑﻪ‬،‫ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ‬
[12] Anderson, K. and P. Hagedorn, 1995, On the Energy Dissipation in
Spacer Dampers in Bundled Conductors of Overhead Transmission 40 ‫ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ‬.‫ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻂ ﺍﺳﺖ‬40 ‫ﻓﺮﻛﺎﻧﺴﻲ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ‬
Lines Journal of Sound and Vibration, 180(4), pp. 539-556.
[13] Hagedorn, P. and M. Kraus, 1993, On the Performance of Spacer ‫ ﻭ‬،‫ﺳﺎﻝ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻂ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ‬
Dampers in Bundled Conductors, European Transactions on Electrical
Power, 3(4), pp. 305-311. ‫ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺪ ﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﻛﻤﻲ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻂ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ‬
[14] Meynen, S., H. Verma, P. Hagedornb, and M. Schafer, 2005, On
the Numerical Simulation of Vortex-Induced Vibrations of .‫ﺍﺳﺖ‬
Oscillating Conductors, Journal of Fluids and Structures, 21, pp.
41-48.
[15] CIGRÉ, 2002, State of the Art Survey on Spacers and Spacer
Dampers: Part 1 - General Description, Cigré SC 22 - Overhead
‫ﻳﺠﻪﮔﻴﺮﻱ‬
‫ ﻧﺖ‬.2.5
lines, WG11-TF5.
.‫ﺗﺄﺙ ﺧﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﻲ ﺁﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﻣﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺑﺮ ﻳﺮ‬
‫ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﻣﺪﻝ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﺎﺕ ﺧﻂ ﻭ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻭﺯﺵ ﺑﺎﺩ‬
.‫ﺍﺭﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺸﺨﺼﺎﺕ ﺩﻣﭙﺮ ﻧﻮ ﻭ ﺧﺴﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‬