Scribd
Upload
3K views3 pages

Research Title Proposal Rubrics

This document contains a rubric for evaluating research title proposals for a qualitative research project. The rubric assesses proposals on general attributes such as quality of presentation, cognitive skills, response to questions, and professionalism. It also contains specific elements within each attribute such as clarity, depth of knowledge, critical thinking, and completeness. Proposals are scored on a scale of does not meet expectations to exceeds expectations. The rubric was prepared by four teachers and checked by the school principal for a senior high school qualitative research course.

Uploaded by

andy
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
3K views3 pages

Research Title Proposal Rubrics

This document contains a rubric for evaluating research title proposals for a qualitative research project. The rubric assesses proposals on general attributes such as quality of presentation, cognitive skills, response to questions, and professionalism. It also contains specific elements within each attribute such as clarity, depth of knowledge, critical thinking, and completeness. Proposals are scored on a scale of does not meet expectations to exceeds expectations. The rubric was prepared by four teachers and checked by the school principal for a senior high school qualitative research course.

Uploaded by

andy
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

CAINTA CATHOLIC COLLEGE

Cainta, Rizal

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL


First Semester, S.Y 2018-2019

PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1: QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

RESEARCH TITLE PROPOSAL RUBRICS

DOES NOT PARTIALLY


MEETS EXCEEDS
GENERAL SPECIFIC MEET MEETS
EXPECTATIONS EXPECTATIONS SCORE
ATTRIBUTE ELEMENT EXPECTATIONS EXPECTATIONS
4 5
2 3
Poor Limited Good Excellent
Communication
communication communication communication communication
Skills
skills skills skills skills
Quality of Needs Excellently clear,
Moderately clear, Satisfactorily clear,
Presentation Formulation of improvement in specific, feasible,
specific, feasible, specific, feasible,
Research clarity, specificity, reflects critical
and with minimal and with minimal
Questions grammar syntax thinking, free from
grammar error grammar error
and feasibility grammatical error
Cognitive Skills Depth of Depth of Depth of
Depth of knowledge Depth of
knowledge knowledge
knowledge unacceptable knowledge limited
acceptable superior
Breadth of Breadth of Breadth of
Breadth of knowledge Breadth of
knowledge knowledge
knowledge unacceptable knowledge limited
acceptable superior
Critical thinking Presentation does Presentation Presentation Presentation
not reflect well- reveals reveals above reveals
developed critical minimal/limited average critical welldeveloped
thinking skills critical thinking thinking skills critical thinking
skills skills

Research Title Proposal Rubrics / Practical Research 1 (Qualitative Research) / August 2018 Page 1
DOES NOT PARTIALLY
MEETS EXCEEDS
GENERAL SPECIFIC MEET MEETS
EXPECTATIONS EXPECTATIONS SCORE
ATTRIBUTE ELEMENT EXPECTATIONS EXPECTATIONS
4 5
2 3
Responses are Responses satisfy
Responses are Responses are
Completeness incomplete or questions only
complete eloquent
Response to require prompting minimally
Questions Responses are Only a portion of
Professionalism Responses are Responses are
flustered or responses are of
when challenged appropriate reflective
defensive acceptable quality

Does not meet Partially meets Meets Exceeds


Overall Title Assessment
expectations expectations expectations expectations

Comments/Recommendation:

Approved Working Title: _______________________________________________________________________________________________


_______________________________________________________________________________________________
Evaluator’s signature over printed name: ______________________________________________________
Date: ____________________________
______________________
Adapted from http://academicdepartments.musc.edu/grad/students/curr_students/forms_guidelines/pdfs/phd_pdfs/Oral%20Defense%20Rubric.pdf with some revisions for specific purposes.

Research Title Proposal Rubrics / Practical Research 1 (Qualitative Research) / August 2018 Page 2
Prepared by:

MR. JORIEL P. CATURA MRS. DOROTHY O. DARIA


Teacher Teacher

MRS. JANE KATHLEEN R. PALMA MR. DANIEL JOHN M. SAN PEDRO


Teacher Teacher

Checked by:

DR. LOIDA V. GASCON


Senior High School Principal

Research Title Proposal Rubrics / Practical Research 1 (Qualitative Research) / August 2018 Page 3

You might also like