0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views2 pages

Carigara National High School: Baseline

This document is a validation form for the School-Based Management (SBM) program at Carigara National High School in Leyte for School Year 2017-2018. It provides ratings for the school's performance in three areas: access, efficiency, and quality. It also provides scores for the school's implementation of four SBM principles: leadership, curriculum and learning, accountability, and resource management. Based on the school's scores in performance improvement and SBM assessment, its overall SBM program is rated as "Developing." The form is signed by the school's SBM coordinators and head.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views2 pages

Carigara National High School: Baseline

This document is a validation form for the School-Based Management (SBM) program at Carigara National High School in Leyte for School Year 2017-2018. It provides ratings for the school's performance in three areas: access, efficiency, and quality. It also provides scores for the school's implementation of four SBM principles: leadership, curriculum and learning, accountability, and resource management. Based on the school's scores in performance improvement and SBM assessment, its overall SBM program is rated as "Developing." The form is signed by the school's SBM coordinators and head.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

SBM VALIDATION FORM

School: CARIGARA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Division: LEYTE


Step 1: Determine Performace Improvement (60%) S.Y. 2017-2018
Thematics
Performance Indicator Rating & Equivalent Points Computation Results
Area
Enrolment Increase % of Inc.
Baseline: 3%
Baseline 1344 1 - Marginal: at least 1%
Access 45% SY 2013-2014 1469 9.30 2 increase 2 - Average: at least 1.67 x 0.45 0.45
SY 2014-2015 1337 -0.52 0 7% increase 3 - High: at least
SY 2015-2016 1363 1.41 1 10% increase
Ave. % of Increase: 1389.7 3.40 1.00
Dropout Rate (DR) % of Dec.
Baseline 7.06 Baseline: 0%
SY 2013-2014 3.95 -44.05 1 1-Marginal: at least 25%
SY 2014-2015 4.04 -42.78 1 decrease 2 - Average: at least 50%
SY 2015-2016 3.87 -45.18 1 decrease 3 - High: has 0 DR
Ave. % of Decrease 3.9533 -44.00 1.00
Completion Rate (CR) % of Inc.
Baseline 75 Baseline: 1.23%
SY 2013-2014 74.22 -1.04 0 1 - Marginal: at least 5%
Efficiency increase 2 - Average: at least 7%
SY 2014-2015 70.96 -5.39 0 1.89 x 0.25 0.08
(25%) increase 3 - High: has 10%
SY 2015-2016 75.22 0.29 0 increase
Ave. % of Increase: 72.047 -6.13 0.00
Cohort Survival Rate (CSR) % of Inc.
Baseline 75 Baseline: 2.97%
SY 2013-2014 73.25 -2.33 0 1 - Marginal: at least 5%
increase 2 - Average: at least 7%
SY 2014-2015 76.24 1.65 0 increase 3 - High: has 10%
SY 2015-2016 77.03 2.71 0 increase
Ave. % of Increase: 175 0.68 0.00
Sub-total (DR+CR+CSR) 0.33
NAT MPS % of Inc. Baseline: 3.50%
Baseline 48 1 - Marginal: at least 5%
SY 2013-2014 42.26 -11.96 0
Quality (30%) SY 2014-2015 65.51 36.49 3 increase 2 - Average: at least 7% 1.67 x 0.30 0.50
SY 2015-2016 51.57 7.44 2 increase 3 - High: has 10%
increase
Ave. % of Increase: 53.115 10.66 1.67
Sub-total 1.03
Interpretation P Good
Better
_____ Best
Legend:
Numerical Rating Scale Description
0.50 - 1.49 Good
1.50 - 2.49 Better
2.50 - 3.00 Best

Note: Only Schools having a Performance of "Better" can apply to the Division for SBM Validation.
Step 2: Compute for vaidated SBM Assessment Scores (40%)
Cumulatice Scores of Validators per Principle
SBM Principles Points Weight Results
Computation
Leadership 30% 2.8 x 0.30 0.00
Curriculum & Learning 30% 2.8 x 0.30 0.00
Accountability 25% 3 x 0.25 0.00
Resource Management 15% 3 x 0.15 0.00
Subtotal 0 100% 0.00
Interpretation Good
P Better
Best
Legend:
Numerical Rating Scale Description
0.50 - 1.49 Good
1.50 - 2.49 Better
2.50 - 3.00 Best
Step 3: Compute for Final Rating
Areas Points Weight Computation Results
A. Performance Improvement 60% 1.72 x .60 0.00
B. SBM Assessment Score (DOD) 40% 2.8 x .40 0.00
TOTAL 0 100% 0.00
Interpretation Developing (Level I)
P Maturing (Level II)
Advanced (Level III)
Legend:
Numerical Rating Scale Description
0.50 - 1.49 Developing
1.50 - 2.49 Maturing
2.50 - 3.00 Advanced

SALVADOR Q. CAONES / MA. CHRISCHELLE A. FERRERAS JULIO B. TOLOSA, Ed. D.


School SBM Coordinators School Head

You might also like