Crim Reviewer Section 00075 PDF

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

• __

would be greater certainty in attaining the


ends of the offender (People v. Matbagon).
- Nighttime facilitated the commission of the
crime to such an extent that the defendant
was able to consummate it with all its details
without anyone nearby becoming aware of
its occurrence (People v. Villas).

- When especially sought for by the offender to


insure the commission of the crime or for the
purpose of impunity (People v. Pardo).
- YES: Waited for nighttime to commit the
crime
- YES: Accused lingered for almost 3 hours
in the evening at the restaurant before
robbing it (People v. Lungbos).
- YES: Where it is self-evident that nighttime
was sought to facilitate the commission
---------------------------------------------------------
of the offense when all the the members
Article 14. Aggravating circumstances. - The following are of the household was asleep (People v.
aggravating circumstances: Berbal), thereby indicating the desire to
carry out the plot with the least detection
6. That the crime be committed in the night time, or in an
uninhabited place, or by a band, whenever such circumstances may or to insure its consummation with a
facilitate the commission of the offense. minimum of resistance from the inmates
of the house (People v. Atencio).
- YES: The accused sought the solitude of
Whenever more than three armed malefactors shall have acted the place in order to better attain their
together in the commission of an offense, it shall be deemed to purpose without interference, and to
have been committed by a band. secure themselves against detection and
punishment (People v. Ong).
- NOT: Nighttime not especially sought for,
when the notion to commit the crime
was conceived only shortly before its
REASON -
commission
EXCEPTION; Nocturnity, even though not
• Greater perversity of the offender?
specially sought, if it facilitated the
- On the time and place of the commission of the
commission of the crime and the
crime and means and ways employed. —
accused took advantage thereof to
commit it, may be considered as an
aggravating circumstance.
“Should These Circumstances Be Considered As One Only Or
Three Separately?” - When the offender took advantage thereof for the
purpose of impunity (US v Billedo).
General Rule: If all 3 circumstances are present, you should - IMPUNITY: exemption from punishment or
consider them as one. freedom from the injurious consequences
of an action.
- Exception: When the 3 can be distinctly perceived
- IMPUNITY: means to prevent his
and can subsist independently of each other,
(accused’s) being recognized, or to
revealing greater perversity. (People v. Librando)
secure himself against detection and
--------------------------------------------------------- punishment.
- The crime was attended by the
in the night time aggravating circumstance of nighttime
- AGGRAVATING WHEN:
because of the silence and darkness of
- When it facilitated the commission of the crime.
the night which enabled the offender to
- When especially sought for by the offender to
take away the girl with impunity –
insure the commission of the crime or for the
something which he could not have
purpose of impunity (People v. Pardo).
done in daytime (US v. Yumul).
- When the offender took advantage thereof for the
purpose of impunity (US v Billedo).

Period of darkness beginning at end of dusk and


- AGGRAVATING WHEN
- When it facilitated the commission of the crime. ending at dawn. Nights are from sunset to sunrise
- WHEN crime can be perpetrated unmolested, (Article 13, Civil Code).
or interference can be avoided or there

11

You might also like