0% found this document useful (0 votes)
94 views3 pages

Math6338 hw7 PDF

The document contains solutions to 7 homework problems about compact linear operators between normed spaces. 1. It shows that the sum of two compact linear operators is compact and that the set of compact linear operators forms a subspace. 2. It proves that the set of compact linear operators between a normed space and a Banach space is a Banach space. 3. It characterizes compact operators in terms of convergence of images of bounded sequences. The remaining problems provide additional examples and properties of compact operators.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
94 views3 pages

Math6338 hw7 PDF

The document contains solutions to 7 homework problems about compact linear operators between normed spaces. 1. It shows that the sum of two compact linear operators is compact and that the set of compact linear operators forms a subspace. 2. It proves that the set of compact linear operators between a normed space and a Banach space is a Banach space. 3. It characterizes compact operators in terms of convergence of images of bounded sequences. The remaining problems provide additional examples and properties of compact operators.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Homework 7

1. If X and Y are normed spaces, and T1 and T2 are compact linear operators, show that
T1 + T2 is a compact linear operator. Show that the compact linear operators from X into
Y constitute a subspace K(X, Y ) of B(X, Y ).

Solution: There are two ways to prove that T1 + T2 are compact if T1 and T2 are com-
pact. One can resort to the characterization of compact operators by sequences, and
simply note that if {xn } is a bounded sequence then {T1 xn } and {T2 xn } have convergent
subsequences. Then use linearity and select a common subsequence so that {(T1 +T2 )xn }
has a convergent subsequence. The other way to prove that T1 +T2 is compact is to recall
that the sum of two compact sets is again compact.

That K(X, Y ) is a subspace is then immediate. We know that K(X, Y ) ⊂ B(X, Y )


since every compact linear operator is bounded. It is immediate that if λ ∈ C and
T ∈ K(X, Y ) then λT ∈ K(X, Y ) too. The above gives that T1 + λS ∈ K(X, Y ) when
T, S ∈ K(X, Y ) and λ ∈ C. So K(X, Y ) is a subspace.

2. If X is a normed space and Y is a Banach space, show that K(X, Y ) is a Banach space.

Solution: If X is a normed space and Y is a Banach space, then B(X, Y ) is a Banach


space. By Problem 1, we have that K(X, Y ) is a subspace of B(X, Y ). We just need to
show that if {Tn } is Cauchy in K(X, Y ) then the limit is a compact operator. Suppose
that {Tn } is Cauchy in K(X, Y ), then since B(X, Y ) is complete, we have that there is
a limit operator T ∈ B(X, Y ). However, since kTn − T k → 0, then we must have that T
is compact (an 3 -argument from class). Thus, we have that {Tn } is convergent and so
K(X, Y ) is a Banach space.

3. Show that a linear operator T : X → X is compact if and only if for every sequence {xn }
of vectors of norm not exceeding 1 the sequence {T xn } has a convergent subsequence.

Solution: To prove this we will use the alternate (equivalent) definition of compactness,
for any bounded sequence {xn } the sequence {T xn } has a convergent subsequence.

First suppose that T is compact and that the the sequence of vectors {xn } is bounded
in norm not exceeding 1. Then it is a bounded sequence and so {T xn } has a convergent
subsequence.

Now suppose that every sequence {xn } of vectors of norm not exceeding 1 the sequence
{T xn } has a convergent subsequence. Let {xn } be a given bounded sequence. Then
there exists a number R > 0 such that kxn k ≤ R for all n. So the sequence yn = xRn

is bounded in norm by 1. Thus,we have that {T yn } has a convergent subsequence. But
since T is linear, we have that R1 T xn has a convergent subsequence. This then gives
that T is compact.

4. If z ∈ X and f ∈ X ∗ , show that T : X → X defined by T x = f (x)z is compact.

Solution: The range of the map is at most one dimensional. Compactness follows easily
from this.

xj
5. Show that T : `p → `p , 1 ≤ p < ∞, with T x = y defined by yj = (T x)j = j
is compact

Solution: Define Tn : `p → `p by
 x xn 
2
Tn x = x1 , , . . . , , . . . .
2 n
Then we clearly have that Tn is compact since it has finite dimensional range. Note that

X |xj |p 1
kTn x − T xkp`p = p
≤ p
kxkp`p .
j=n+1
j (n + 1)

So we have that Tn → T uniformly. Then, we have that T is compact by the Theorem


in class.

6. Suppose that X is a Banach space. Let T ∈ B(X) and let S ∈ K(X). Show that
T S, ST ∈ K(X). Note that this implies that K(X) is an ideal in B(X).

Solution: Let B ⊂ X be any bounded set. Since T is bounded, we have that T (B) is
a bounded set too. Thus, ST (B) = S(T (B)) is relatively compact, and so ST is compact.

Let {xn } be any bounded sequence in X. Then since S is compact the sequence {Sxn }
has a convergent subsequence, denoted by {Sxnk }. Since T is bounded, we have that
{T Sxnk } is a convergent sequence. This gives that T S is compact.

7. Define the shift operator on `2 := `2 (N ∪ {0}) by



0 : n=0
(Sx)n =
xn−1 : n ≥ 1
1
Similarly, define the multiplication operator M : `2 → `2 by (M x)n = x .
n+1 n
Set T = M S.
1
Show that T is compact. Compute kT n k and limn kT n k n
Solution: We switch notation to avoid double subscripts. A sequence will be denoted
by x(n) instead of xn . First observe that

0 : n=0
T x(n) = x(n−1)
n+1
: n≥1
For k ∈ N define the operator

 0 : n=0
x(n−1)
Tk x(n) = n+1
: 1≤n≤k
0 : n > k.

Note that Tk is linear and compact. A simple computation then gives that
2
X |x(n − 1)|2
kT x − Tk xk`2 =
n≥k
(n + 1)2
1
≤ kxk2`2 .
(k + 1)2
1
This gives that kTk − T k ≤ k+1
and so Tk → T uniformly, and so T is compact.

Now we first compute T 2 . A straightforward computation gives that



2 0 : n=0
T x(n) = T (T x(n)) = T x(n−1)
n+1
: n≥1

 0 : n=0
= 0 : n=1
 x(n−2)
(n+1)n
: n ≥ 2.
More generally, we have that
(
0 : 0≤n≤k−1
T k x(n) = x(n−k)
Qk−1 : n ≥ k.
j=0 (n+1−j)

From this representation we conclude that



k 2 X 2 1 1
T x 2 =
`
|x(n)| Q k−1
≤ Q k−1
kxk2`2 .
2 2
n=0 j=0 (n + k + 1 − j) j=0 (k + 1 − j)

And choosing x = (1, 0, 0, . . .) gives that


k
T 2 2 = Q 1
` →` k−1
.
j=0 (k + 1 − j)
1
From this it is easy to deduce that limn kT n k n = 0. Indeed,
k−1
1 1X
log T k = − (k + 1 − j)
k k j=0
 
1 k(k + 1) k+3
= − (k + 1)k − =− .
k 2 2
This last expression converges to −∞ as k → ∞ then exponentiation gives the claim.

You might also like