"Attributes Consumers Look While Purchasing Mobile Online": Submitted To
"Attributes Consumers Look While Purchasing Mobile Online": Submitted To
"Attributes Consumers Look While Purchasing Mobile Online": Submitted To
Submitted to
Submitted By:
Pratishta Bhardwaj
Date:
DECLARATION BY THE CANDIDATE
I declare that the Research Paper Report entitled “Attributes consumers look while purchasing
mobile online” is submitted by me is based on original research conducted by me during the
period from __/__/____ to __/__/____ under the guidance of Professor Rajkiran Pund and I
further declare that there is no falsification of data/ material to the best of my knowledge.
I further declare that the material obtained from sources has been duly acknowledged in the
report.
Date:
Place:
Pratishta Bhardwaj
TM1918208
CERTIFICATE OF THE GUIDE
I certify that the work incorporated in the Research Report titled, “Attributes consumers look
while purchasing mobile online” submitted by Ms. Pratishta Bhardwaj is her original work
which was carried out by the candidate under my supervision and guidance. I further certify
that the above work was duly approved by me and this work is the result of candidate’s
independent study and effort. Such material has been obtained from other sources has been
duly acknowledged in the thesis.
Date
Place: Delhi (Signature of candidate)
INDEX
TOPIC PAGE NO
Title page
Declaration by the candidate
Certificate of the mentor
Acknowledgement
Index
List of tables
List of Figures
List of Abbreviation
1 Abstract
2 Introduction
3 Objective
4 Hypothesis
5 Literature Review
6 Research Methodology
7 Data analysis, Interpretation
and Hypothesis Testing
8 Findings
9 Recommendation/
Suggestions
10 Limitations
11 Conclusion
12 Reference
13 Appendix A
14 Appendix B: Questionnaire
for personal interview
LIST OF TABLES
Research design:
Primary source:
1. Questionnaire was formed to collect data from people suggesting their views on the
attributes of a mobile they prefer while purchasing it online.
2. Primary data was analyzed with the help of MS Excel and SPSS.
OBJECTIVE
To discover the attributes consumers look while purchasing mobile online.
HYPOTHESIS:
Hypothesis 1.1:
H0: There is no significant relationship between price and purchasing decision of consumers for
mobile
online.
H1: There is a significant relationship between price and purchasing decision of consumers for
mobile
online.
Hypothesis 1.2:
H0: There is no significant relationship between features and purchasing decision of consumers
for
mobile online.
H1: There is a significant relationship between features and purchasing decision of consumers
for
mobile online.
Hypothesis 1.3:
H0: There is no significant relationship between brand name and purchasing decision of
consumers for
mobile online.
H1: There is a significant relationship between brand name and purchasing decision of
consumers for
mobile online.
Hypothesis 1.4:
H0: There is no significant relationship between durability and purchasing decision of
consumers for
mobile online.
H1: There is a significant relationship between durability and purchasing decision of consumers
for
mobile online.
Hypothesis 1.5:
H0: There is no significant relationship between online reviews and purchasing decision of
consumers
for mobile online.
H1: There is a significant relationship between online reviews and purchasing decision of
consumers for
mobile online.
Hypothesis 1.6:
H0: There is no significant relationship between after sales service and purchasing decision of
consumers for mobile online.
H1: There is a significant relationship between after sales service and purchasing decision of
consumers
for mobile online.
Literature Review:
The use and size of the mobile phone in the market has grown considerably in the past 40 years
since its inception. With the rapid expansion of the telecommunications industry, there is an
early innovation in technology related to mobile devices. It is a point of concern to encounter a
consumer purchasing decision process and a shadow cast over the factors that ultimately
decide consumers; choices between different mobile phones while comparing them online.
Understanding the factors that push a consumer to choose and buy a mobile phone online is
therefore a vital area to study, now this subject has been chosen to better understand. It is also
evident that global manufacturing companies still want to find out the reasons that trigger in
the minds of consumers who influence the purchasing decision. There are quite a number of
studies that are being conducted in the past on consumer perspective in buying a mobile phone
or a cellular device online. Brief synopses of those studies are listed here in below:
Malviya and Saluja (2013) conducted a study to identify the factors that influence the
purchase decision of online smartphone users. The objective of this study was to
discover the main factors that have a dominant effect on consumer behavior while
making a decision to buy a smartphone online. The researcher took a sample of 250
respondents for the study. The researcher used chi-square, factor analysis and reliability
analysis using the SPSS statistical package for the analysis and interpretation of the data.
Research has also revealed that features such as technology, brand and social image
also plays a major role in the purchasing decisions of smartphone users.
Karjaluoto, Karvonen (2005) studied the various factors that determine consumers;
choice to buy a new mobile device and the reasons why an existing mobile device is
replaced by a new device. They concluded that innovative services, multimedia, design,
brand and basic properties, external influence, price are the main factors that
consumers are looking for.
Lay-Yee, Kok-Siew and Yin-Fah (2013) conducted a study to find out and investigate the
purchasing decision of the Malaysian generation Y. The researchers also wanted to
investigate the association of the purchasing decision with the brand, price,
dependence, convenience and product and society. They collected primary data from
125 respondents through a self-administered questionnaire. Their study confirms that
there is a positive association between the decision to buy smartphones and the brand,
price, dependence, convenience and product and society in the generation Y city.
Uddin, Lopa and Oheduzzaman(2014) conducted a study to discover the latent variables
(factors) that play a leading role in the purchase decision of smartphone users. They
included 34 variables in the study and classified these variables into seven factors,
namely the physical attributes of the first factor, the pricing of the second factor, the
billing of the third factor and other operating facilities, the size and weight of the fourth
factor, recommendations of friends and colleagues of the fifth factor, advertising of the
sixth factor. This research is a study based on 160 opinions of respondents in total. They
applied factor analysis for factor extraction and descriptive statistical tools for data
analysis. They believed that the most important factor is the physical attribute, which
contributes to a 30.992% variance in the purchasing decision.
Shows that sample respondents are very young age. Approximately 79.2% of respondents are
from the age group of 18-25 years. 19.8% are from age group 25-36 and remaining are from 45-
above. It also says 50.4% are male and remaining is female. 88.1% are single and the remaining
are married. 67.3% are student and the remaining are employed (private sector, self-employed
and government sector)
TABLE 3: DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS
Descriptive statistics such as mean (5-point scale) and standard deviation (higher std deviation
indicates higher variability of customers’ perception) were used to measure the variables and
also used to describe the mean of dependent and independent variables. Table shows the
mean value of price is 3.85 and std deviation is 1.203. The mean value of features is 3.85 and
std deviation is 1.317. The mean value of brand name is 3.87 and std deviation is 1.317. The
mean value of durability is 3.88 and std deviation is 1.306. The mean value of online reviews is
3.67 and std deviation is 1.342. The mean value of after sales service is 3.90 and std deviation is
1.196. Finally, the mean value of overall factors is 2.97 and std deviation is 1.374.
TABLE 4: CROSS TABULATION
In the above table it is observed that out of 101 respondents 20 are satisfied, 18 are strongly
satisfied, 23 are neutral, 21 are dissatisfied and 19 are strongly dissatisfie d.
It is observed that P value is more than 0.05. So we can say that purchasing decision of mobile
online is not dependent on gender.
TABLE 6: MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION
In order to achieve the objective of the study, multiple regressions were used to study the
effect of the independent variables to dependent variable.
The above results were obtained after setting multiple linear regressions.
TABLE 7:
In the table of ANOVA explained that overall model was significant. Since the sig. Value is less
than 0.05 so it indicates that the model is statistically significant. It is clear that all the
independent variables, that is price, features, brand name, durability, online reviews and after
sales service are connected to the dependent variable, that is, prefer mode (online or offline)
( F=3.912) (sig 0.002). Furthermore, this result is supported by the significant correlation among
the variables. The number of independent variables relative to the sample size influences R
square. The adjusted R square becomes smaller as fewer observations per independent
variable are made. It reflects the decreasing ratio of estimated coefficients to the sample size
and compensates for (over fitting) of the data as R square increases.
TABLE 8: REGRESSION COEFFICIENT:
Standardize
Unstandardized d
Coefficients Coefficients
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.
1. (Constant) 1.592 .141 11.266 .000
PRICE -.062 .030 .122 -2.095 .039
features -.012 .030 -.048 -.414 .680
brand name -.074 .029 .089 -2.535 .013
durability .050 .028 .193 1.777 .024
online reviews -0.32 .029 -.129 -1.100 .274
after sale service .009 .029 .031 .293 .770
It is observed that in all the variables the significant value of Price, Brand name and Durability
is less than 0.05, so we reject null hypothesis and accept alternate hypothesis that there is a
significant impact of these factors (Price, Brand name, Durability) on consumer purchasing
decision of mobile online. Among all these variables, Durability is the major variable with
standardized coefficient b= 0.193 that can satisfy the customer toward their particular service
provider. While Price is the second momentous variable with a standardized coefficient of
b=0.122. Brand name is the third momentous variable with a standardized coefficient of
b=0.089. Remaining variables such as Features(b=-2.095), Online reviews(b=-1.100) and after
sale service(0.293) are comparatively less influenced consumer purchasing decision of mobile
online.
TABLE 9: SUMMARY OF HYPOTHESIS RESULTS
HYPOTHESIS RESULT
There is no significant relationship between price Reject null hypothesis
and purchasing decision of consumers for mobile
online.
As the world is moving towards digitization and majority of respondents prefer online
shopping than offline shopping therefore the companies should emphasize more on
selling their mobile products online and creating a buzz over there.
They should launch more and more discounts and trending offers time to time as these
influence people to purchase mobile online.
They should also concentrate on the factors (price, brand name and durability) and
should take necessary steps to maintain these factors to retain and earn customers.
LIMITATIONS:
REFERENCE:
QUESTIONNAIRE:
Q1: Name
Q2: Gender
Q3: Age
Q4: Status
Q5: Occupation
Q6: Income
Q8: If online then what platform do you prefer online shopping for mobile?
A) Yes b) No
Q12: How much important are these factors while purchasing mobile online? (on a scale 1
to 5)
1 2 3 4 5
Price:
Features:
Brand name:
Durability:
Online reviews: