Project Report: Idukki
Project Report: Idukki
Project Report: Idukki
ON
Promoted by ,
Sheeba Asis
Palakuzhyill (H) , Cheenikuzhy
Ajitha Jayaprakash
Puthanpurackal (H) , Cheenikuzhy
INTRODUCTION
Fish is the cheapest and most easily digestible animal protein and was obtained from
natural sources from time immemorial for consumption by human beings.
However, due to over exploitation and pollution, the availability of fish in natural
waters have declined considerably forcing scientists to adopt various methods to
increase its production. Fish farming in controlled or under artificial conditions has
become the easier way of increasing the fish production and its availability for
consumption. Farmers can easily take up fish culture in village ponds, tanks or
any new water body and can improve their financial position substantially. It also
creates gainful employment for skilled and unskilled youths. The technology developed
for fish culture in which more than one type of compatible fishes are cultured
simultaneous is the most advanced and popular in the country . This technology
is known as Composite Fish Culture. This technology enables to get maximum fish
production from a pond or a tank through utilization of available fish food
organisms in all the natural niches , supplemented by artificial feeding. Any
perennial fresh water pond/tank retaining water depth of 2 meters can be used
for fish culture purpose. However, the minimum level should not fall below one
meter . Even seasonal ponds can also be utilized for short duration fish culture
The Entrepreneur
This is a sole proprietorship enterprise and the entrepreneur of the unit is
Dhebar Joseph Kunthanam (H), Cheenikuzhy . He is aware of establishing and
successfully running a FishFarm Unit. They are currently running the farm and is
seeking for its expansion.
Location
MANPOWER
The promoter itself is the worker . Hence , there is no need to hire external
workers to carry out the process.
Financial Feasibility
The financial feasibility of the scheme is evidenced by the projected cost of
production , profitability analysis, Projected Cash flow statement and break even
Analysis.
Cost of Production and Profitability Analysis
The cost of production and profitability analysis is computed and annexed. This
is based on the following assumption.
GOVERNMENT ASSISTANCE
The Enterpreneur’s purpose to avail financial assistance under the scheme PMMY
Conclusion
Considering the above aspects ,the scheme is technically feasible and
economically viable.
PARAMETERS VALUE
System of rearing Deep litter system
Batch Size +5%
Batch interval 52 days (45 days r +7 days c(leaning)
Mortality of birds 5%
Cycle size 2000
Cost of day –old chick Rs 25
Cost of kg of feed Rs 28
Cost of equipment (waterers ,feeders etc.) Rs 15/bird
Cost of insurance ,medicine ,vaccine etc. Rs 4/bird/year
Insurance per bird 0.5
Insurance of building and equipment 0.001
No. of batches/year introduced in the first year 6
No of batches / year (sold) 6
No of batch introduced 2-5 years 7
No of batch sold 2-6 years 7
Cost of kg of quail meat Rs 210
Feed convertion ratio FCR 1.68 to 1.72
Average quail need to make a 1kg 3
Feed requirement to attain 1 kg body weight 1.875kg
Rearing period 45 days
Cleaning period One week
Interest rate 15%/year
Repayment period 5 years
ANNEXURE – 1
ANNEXURE -2
ANNEXURE -3
WORKING CAPITAL
WORKING CAPITAL (AMOUNT IN RS.)
Cost of chicks 2060@ RS.40/chick (5% extra for 82400
mortality 2% free from hatchery)
CONTIGENCY 13250
ANNEXURE -5
PROJECT COST
SI.No PARTICULARS (AMOUNT IN RS.)
.
1. Total working capital 183900
i ii iii iv v
Cost of feed for birds @0.625/bird 262500 306250 306250 306250 306250
Rs. 35/kg
Misc , expenditure i.e. electricity, vaccine, 48000 56000 56000 56000 56000
medicine , insurance etc. including veterinary aid
@8/bird/batch
Insurance of shed building and equipment 18500 18500 18500 18500 18500
INCOME
Sale of broiler 83300 98000 98000 98000 98000
@ Rs.70/bird
(kg @ Rs.210)
Sale of 7000 8000 8000 8000 8000
manure
Sale of 1152000 1296000 1296000 1296000 1296000
eggs@2/egg
Depreciation
on shed and 32150
building etc @
10%year
Depreciation 8750
on equipments
@15%/year
TOTAL 1242300 1402000 1402000 1402000 1442900
GROSS PROFIT 412900 437450 437450 437450 478350
ANNEXURE -7
Year 1 2 3 4 5
Capital 466100
Costs
ANNEXURE -8
BREAK – EVEN ANALYSIS
Financial Indicators Estimated Value Preferred value
ANNEXURE -9
REPAYMENT SHEDULE OF LOAN @15%
DEPRECIATION STATEMENT
Cost of Machinery & Depreciation Written down Value
Equipments
1st year 466100 46610 419490
2nd year 46610 372880
3rd year 46610 326270
4th year 46610 279660
5th year 46610 233050
6th year 46610 186440
7th year 46610 139830
8th year 46610 93220
9th year 46610 46610
10th year 46610
466100
CONCLUSION
The project can generate sufficient return to effect the repayment of loan . The
financial indicators show that the scheme is technically feasible and economically
viable .
Promoted by ,
Sheeba Asis
Palakuzhyill (H) , Cheenikuzhy
Ajitha Jayaprakash
Puthanpurackal (H) , Cheenikuzhy