Classical Vs Operant
Classical Vs Operant
11/16/14
modification, however there are several important differences. Classical conditioning occurs as a
result of a series of experiences. The organism is initially exposed to the unconditioned stimuli.
& Woolf, 2014). An example would be a painful stimulus causing a person to grimace. The
organism does not need to be taught to grimace, this will occur the very first time it experiences
pain. This is why pain would be considered an unconditioned stimuli.To condition the organism,
a neutral stimuli is added simultaneously. For example, if you present an infant with a
hypodermic needle this will not produce a response. The hypodermic needle is a neutral
stimulus. During vaccination the needle enters the skin and causes pain which causes the child to
grimace and/or cry. After a series of vaccinations the child will undoubtedly grimace and/or cry
at the sight of a hypodermic needle. The hypodermic needle has become the conditioned stimuli
essentially because the child has learned to associate the hypodermic needle with pain. With this
analogy, higher order conditioning can also be seen. As the child learns to associate doctors with
needles and needles with pain the child will grimace and become fearful at the suggestion of
going to the doctor. Eventually these two stimuli will become so closely related in the childs
mind that simply mentioning a doctors visit seems to elicit pain in the child. In contrast, operant
treat every time he sits. As a result, he will learn to sit when commanded so he can have a treat.
chores as a result of receiving good grades. On the other hand, punishment, which can also be
negative or positive, is an action that decreases behavior(Lilienfeld, Lynn, Namy, & Woolf,
children want attention and will quickly discontinue any behavior that is ignored while
increasing any behavior that produces a response. On the contrary, an example of positive
punishment would be taking a habitually truant teenager and giving them a dollar for every day
they attend all of their classes. This student will probably stop missing class altogether. So,
receiving the money decreases the amount of class days missed. In conclusion, both styles of
conditioning help an organism learn but the major difference between classical conditioning and
There are numerous examples of how classical conditioning can modify behavior, of
those, behavior modification that can be seen most clearly occurs with animal training and Post
Traumatic Stress Disorder. The example of Pavlov’s Dog in the text clearly demonstrates how
classical conditioning works. The dog is presented with meat powder, this causes him to salivate.
The dog is presented with a noise and meat powder simultaneously. Eventually, the meat powder
is removed but the dog still salivates at the sound of the bell because he has learned to associate
the two events(Lilienfeld, Lynn, Namy, & Woolf, 2014). This works with all types of animal
conditioning. One invention that utilizes classical conditioning is the bark collar. Every time the
dog barks he receives an electric shock. Eventually he believes barking causes the shock and he
stops barking; this is a prime example of classical conditioning and an appropriate segue into
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. According to an article titled Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
written by the Anxiety and Depression Association of America, “Posttraumatic stress disorder, or
PTSD, is a serious potentially debilitating condition that can occur in people who have
experienced or witnessed a natural disaster, serious accident, terrorist incident, sudden death of a
loved one, war, violent personal assault such as rape, or other life-threatening events.” Post
aforementioned example involving the hypodermic needle describes how a previously neutral
stimuli (a hypodermic needle) can create an intense fear response in a person. In the case of post
traumatic stress disorder a person is presented with an unconditioned stimulus that creates
intense distress. Examples include rape, war, bombings, torture, natural disasters ect. In an effort
to survive the brain associates seeming all other stimulus that are present with the event. Like
taste aversion, PTSD usually only requires one or two exposures before the organism avoids all
associated stimuli. “Psychological symptoms after trauma may include hyper vigilance and poor
concentration. Flashbacks can occur consisting of images, sounds, smells, and feelings, causing
the sufferer to lose touch with reality and repeatedly re-experience the traumatic incident. These
often are triggered by ordinary occurrences such as a door slamming or the backfiring of a car.
Furthermore, other symptoms such as insomnia, and an exaggerated startle response are
common(Bowirrat et al., 2006).” In the example of Pavlov’s dog, the dog began to salivate at
the sound of the bell because the dog believed he would receive food next (Lilienfeld, Lynn,
Namy, & Woolf, 2014). In the same way, when a person with PTSD encounters a conditioned
stimulus such as a nose or a smell that was present at the time of the trauma they will elicit the
same response they had during the trauma (fighting,hiding, elevated heart rate, sweating,
hyperventilation). Also, when someone experiences a second traumatic event they are at higher
risk for developing PTSD("Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) | Anxiety and Depression
Association of America, ADAA," n.d.). This demonstrates how repeatedly conditioning the
organism strengthens the response. PTSD is difficult the resolve because classical conditioning
effects involuntary behavior. As a result, the person can not control their reaction to the
conditioned stimulus but as time passes and the conditioned stimuli is present repeatedly without
the unconditioned stimuli the symptoms begin to fade and extinction occurs(Lilienfeld, Lynn,
Namy, & Woolf, 2014). Overall, classical conditioning is an effective way to modify involuntary
behavior.
behavior. When working with a client to stop biting her fingernails operant condition would
suggest the use of either a negative or positive punishment. When considering the diversity of
humanity it is easy to conclude “one size does not fit all…” As a result, to treat someone with an
anxiety related condition such as nail biting each method should be attempted until one works.
Some respond better to negative punishment. The patient could wear a rubberband around their
wrist and snap it every time they realize they are biting their nails(Chang, 2012). If this is
ineffective the patient could try positive reinforcement like going to yoga or doing something fun
when they are feeling stressed instead of sitting around biting their nails and worrying about the
problem(Chang, 2012). For a client that would like to adapt a workout regimen positive or
negative reinforcement would be more beneficial than punishment. An example of positive
reinforcement would include the client making a delicious protein shake after working out. This
will cause the client to look forward to the experience because it ends with a delicious protein
shake and makes her feel great. If this does not work the client can try negative reinforcement.
On the days she is supposed to workout, she will have to refrain from eating any food with
carbohydrates until the workout is complete. This will make her want to workout just so she can
eat that subway sandwich or shrimp alfredo that was planned for lunch. Overall, operant
understanding behavior and behavior modification. Classical conditioning can help elicit
involuntary responses in an organism which will change their behavior in both positive and
negative ways. Operant conditioning can modify behavior by motivating an organism to change
in order to receive desired results. Both are very important and can be used in schools, jails,
organizations and anywhere behavior modification is desired. The only downfall of behavior
modification is the fact that consistency is necessary of continued success otherwise extinction
can occur.
References
http://www.adaa.org/understanding-anxiety/posttraumatic-stress-disorder-ptsd
Bowirrat, A., Chen, T. J., Blum, K., Madigan, M., Bailey, J. A., Chen, A. L., . . . Gold, M. (2006,
Chang, L., MD. (2012, November 02). Stop Nail Biting: Treatments and Causes of Biting
http://www.webmd.com/beauty/nails/stop-nail-biting-tips
Lilienfeld, S. O., Lynn, S. J., Namy, L. L., & Woolf, N. J. (2014). Psychology and scientific
thinking. In Psychology from inquiry to understanding (4th ed., pp. 2-41). Upper Saddle