Inter-Religious Relations in Nigeria

AFRREV IJAH, Vol.
3 (2) April, 2014
AFRREV IJAH
An International Journal of Arts and Humanities
Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
Vol. 3 (2), S/No 10, April, 2014:46-62
ISSN: 2225-8590 (Print) ISSN 2227-5452 (Online)
Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ijah.v3i2.4
Christian – Muslim Relations in Nigeria: The

Problems and Prospects
Ottuh, Peter O. O.
Dept. of Philosophy and Religious Studies
Samuel Adegboyega University
P.M.B. 0001, Ogwa, Edo State, Nigeria
E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
+2348067627992
Ottuh, John A., Ph.D.

Winners Baptist Church,
P. O. Box 1214, Effurun,
Delta State, Nigeria.
Email:[email protected]; [email protected]
+2348073780529;
&
Aitufe, V. O.
Dept. of Religious Management and Cultural Studies
Ambrose Alli University
P.M.B. 14, Ekpoma, Edo State, Nigeria
E-mail: [email protected]
+2348084269908
Copyright © IAARR 2014: www.afrrevjo.net/ijah 46

Indexed and Listed in AJOL, ARRONET
AFRREV IJAH, Vol.3 (2) April, 2014
Abstract
Inter-religious relations imply possible and practicable cordial
relationship that exists between religions in a society. Its instrument is
interfaith dialogue aimed at cordiality, togetherness, tolerance and
acceptance that will be the true sign of a new era in the religious
history of humanity. On both international and national levels,
attempts have been and are still being made to establish dialogue or
good relations between Muslims and Christians with a view to
avoiding the mistakes of the past, and creating a better world, and a
better Nigeria for the present and future generations. The paper
explores the remote and possible causes of the present widespread
problems in Christians and Muslims relations in Nigeria; and to
reflect on the possible impact on the Nigerian nationhood. Basic
findings of this study show that Nigeria‟s stability, democracy, and
national cohesion are threatened by extremism and conflict arising
from Islamic and Christian fundamentalism is believed to be
predicated on the Nigerian political and economic malaise and social
dislocation of recent decades. The paper recommends and concludes
that all religious adherents must embrace Inter-religious dialogue
which demands religions nurture, faith, trust, dialogue,
communication, reconciliation, and mutual understanding of one
another thus guaranteeing communal good for Nigerians.
Key Words: Inter-religious; Nigeria Christian; Muslim
Introduction
Inter-religious relations may be considered a challenge to one's faith
but one cannot run away from such a challenge. Through this
challenge, we may find that our faith can grow. Most adherents may
force this challenge upon themselves considering it to be a very
rational observation, that is, one which may turn them around from
believing that their religion is the only right one and been unable to
acknowledge that there is truth in all other religions. On the contrary,
they should be able to contemplate that if these other religions have
survived for thousands of years and are followed by hundreds of

Christian-Muslim AFRREV
RelationsIJAH, Vol.3 the
in Nigeria: (2) problems
April, 2014
and Prospects
millions, even a billion people, there must be some truth in them or if

not, they would not have spread and lasted to date. Man owes it to
himself to search everywhere for this „Universal Truth‟. This Truth is
a message about God in the world that goes beyond the specific
language of any particular theology or religious tradition. Thus every
religion of humanity is the inheritance of every individual human
being. It is generally remarked by some observers that Nigeria, like
some African nations is presently feeling the biting effects of the
global recession in all spheres of human life.
Importance and Problems of Inter-Religious Relations
It is a truism that learning about other people's religions can lead to a
greater understanding of Religious Truth. For one thing, the process of
explaining our own faith to people of other faiths may help us grasp it
better. When people share their faith with others, one may be
surprised by the similarities that become evident and serve to point out
the Universal and more basic Truths that we may not be able to
disagree on because we have all been affected by them (Osasona,
2002). An understanding of other beliefs can help strengthen our own
faith when we realize how strongly we disagree with the other beliefs.
In the least, an understanding of other people's faiths can aid in our
relations with people who differ from us in their understanding of life,
the world, God and the nature of humanity (Ugwoji, 2008).
The perception of the Supernatural by different religions can be
described with the following analogy: for instance, imagine God at the
center of a circle with people of different religions standing around the
circumference. We are all looking at the same object but each of us
will only see one side of it. There is another Indian story that also
speaks to this notion. According to this story (Onimhawo and Ottuh,
2009), six blind men went to see an elephant. One touched the leg of
the elephant, and said, “The elephant is like a tree.” The second
touched the trunk, and said, “The elephant is like a snake.” The third
touched the elephant's side, and said, “The elephant is like a wall.”
The fourth touched the ears, and said, “The elephant is like a fan.” The
fifth touched the tusk, and said, “The elephant is like a spear.” The

sixth touched the tail, and said, "The elephant is like a rope.” Thus
they began to dispute amongst themselves as to the figure of the
elephant. A passerby seeing them quarreling, asked what the dispute
was all about. They told him everything, and asked him to arbitrate.
That man said, “None of you has seen the elephant. The elephant is
not like a tree; its legs are like trees. It is not like a wall; its side is like
a wall. It is not like a fan; its ears are like fans. It is not like a snake,
but its nose is like that. It is not like a spear; its tusks are like spears. It
is not like a rope; its tail is like a rope. The elephant is the
combination of all these.” When we share our various views of God
with each other we can gain a more complete picture.
The many differences in religions are more often than not, things that
do not matter so much. Some people are more comfortable with
certain rituals and others are not. Some mentalities are better suited to
one philosophy while others find a clearer understanding through
another. There have always been different religions and it is folly for
us to imagine that it will ever be any other way. Everyone feels that
their own beliefs are truer than everyone else's. Everyone's beliefs
work for them hence they would hold to it, but the same belief does
not work for everyone. Religions are like languages that we use to
speak to each other about God and to express one‟s religious
sentiments.
Religions in Nigeria: History and Problems
The existence of religion can be traced back to human civilization
(Jones, 2005). Some religions have died out but others have grown up
to take their place. New prophets and new religions are bound to
continue to spring up in the future. As earlier stated, three major
religions exist in Nigeria: Islam, Christianity and African Traditional
Religion. All religions have a history of radical revivalism. The three
religions do not consider each other as friends but rivals. Although the
Muslims acknowledge Christ as a prophet, they hold strongly to the
teachings of the Qur‟an which they believe comes directly from God.
They live strictly according to the Qur‟an and they find it necessary to
conquer and bring all the infidels into the true faith, which is Islam.

Christian-Muslim Relations
AFRREV in Vol.3
IJAH, Nigeria:
(2) the problems
April, 2014 and Prospects
Some Christians on the other hand feel offended by the teachings of

Islam and hold strongly to the position that, outside Christ, there is no
salvation; all Muslims and traditional religionists will go to hell unless
they receive Christ as their personal Lord and Saviour. Related to this
is a battle of supremacy between the Muslims and Christians in the
political and economical spheres.
Several religions in Nigeria co-exist, thus helping to accentuate
regional and ethnic distinctions. However, Islam dominated the north
and held strong numbers in the South Western, Yoruba part of the
country. Islam is an important religion in West Africa. Nigeria is one
of the largest Muslim populated nations in West Africa (Jones, 2005).
Islam was introduced to northern Nigeria as early as the eleventh
century and was well established in the major capitals of the region by
the sixteenth century, spreading into the countryside and toward the
middle belt uplands. Shehu Usman dan Fodio established a
government in Northern Nigeria based on Islam before the advent of
Colonialism. Islam also came to South Western Yoruba-speaking
areas during the time of Mansa Musa in Mali Empire. The Yoruba
colloquially referred to Islam as "Esin-Mali" or some will say "Esin-
Mole", which means religion from Mali. Muslims in Nigeria practice
the Maliki School of jurisprudence and are mostly Sunni Muslims;
The Shia Muslims of Nigeria are primarily located in the Sokoto State
(Francis, 2005).
Christianity is the second largest religion in Nigeria, according to the
most recent survey (CIA World Fact Book, 2010). Protestantism and
local syncretic Christianity are evident in Yoruba areas, while
Catholicism dominated the Igbo and closely related areas. Both
Protestantism and Catholicism dominated in the Ibibio, Annang, and
the Efik kiosa lands. The 1963 census indicated that 47 percent of
Nigerians were Muslim, 35 percent Christian, and 18 percent
members of local indigenous congregations (Berret, 1983). If
accurate, this indicated a sharp increase since 1953 in the number of
Christians (up to 13 percent); a slight decline among those professing
indigenous beliefs, compared with 20 percent; and only a modest (4

percent) rise of Muslims (Ottuh and Onimhawo, 2003). There has

been growth in the Christ Apostolic Church (the first Aladura
Movement in Nigeria) and the Aladura Church, an indigenous
Christian sect that was especially strong in the Yoruba areas and of
evangelical churches in general, spilling over into adjacent and
southern areas of the middle belt. In general, however, the country
should be seen as having a predominantly Muslim north, a mixed
Christian and Muslim Southwest and Middle belt, a non-Muslim,
primarily Christian South East and South-South, with each as a
minority faith in the other's region.
The problems which have often resulted into frictions and tensions in
Nigeria include the evils of fanaticism and bigotism, intolerance,
exclusivism, ignorance, etc (Ottuh and Onimhawo, 2003). These
among others, are what constitute the impediments to genuine
dialogue and co-operation (The Daily Times of Wednesday January
15, 1985). From the brief history we have given above, it can be seen
that the misuse of and ignorance of historical facts have often led to
frictions. The Muslims and Christians who know the historical facts
do not want to forget the ugly incidences recorded in these histories.
The Vatican council was aware of this when it urges both Muslims
and Christians to forget the past. But it is also pertinent to ask both
Muslims to remember the past history and try to ruminate on the
positive side of it. They should remember how Muhammad and the
early Christian leaders lived cordially. They lived the way they did
because they did not forget the basic tenets of these religions. So, the
first cause of tension we identify is ignorance of history, and where it
is known it is used negatively. Thus, ignorance of and negative use of
history led to tension and friction between Muslim and Christians
(Ottuh and Onimhawo, 2003).
To be a religious fanatic is to be wild and excessive about matters that
pertain to one‟s religion. And to be a religious bigot means, one who
is blindly and obstinately devoted to be particular creed (Ottuh and
Onimhawo, 2003). Thus it follows that all acts, words portraying these
attitudes are tantamount to religious fanaticism and bigotism. To be a

AFRREV
Christian-Muslim IJAH,
Relations in Vol.3 (2) the
Nigeria: April, 2014 and Prospects
problems
fanatic or a bigot is to be an extremist. This attitude which has often

times been displayed by both Muslims and Christians have not helped
dialogue and co-action. For example, the sharia issue raised by the
Muslims during the time of constitution drafting process was as result
of fanaticism. The Muslims from all indications wanted Nigeria to be
declared an Islamic state. The report about Nigeria‟s membership of
O.I.C. an Islamic body is a proof of fanaticism (The Daily Times of
Sunday Dec. 8th, 1985).
Muslim – Christian Relations in the Past and Present
History revealed that although Muhammad did not know much about
Christianity, he showed much respect for Christianity. He admired the
constant prayers of Christian monks. It was revealed that there was a
time a group of Christians came from Najran in Southern Arabia to
see Muhammad and allowed them to celebrate their Christian liturgy
in his mosque in Medina (Mala, 1985). It is interesting to discover
from history that there was a cordial relationship between the Muslims
and the “people of the book” as the Koran refers to the Christians at
the time of the Prophet:
Dispute not with the people of the book save in the
fairer manner, except for those of them that do
wrong; and say, we believe in what has been sent
down to us, and what has been sent down to you; our
God and your God is one, and to him we have
surrendered {Qur‟an 29:46}.
A deep spirit of mutual respect and co-operation between Muslims
and Christians was obvious in the letter of Pope Gregory which he
sent to An-Nasir, the king of Bujaya in Algeria, in 1706 (Nwanaju,
2005). In that letter Pope Gregory acknowledged the message of An-
Nasir who requested that the priest servantus be consecrated as
bishops. An-Nasir also sent some gifts to the Pope and released some
Christians who were held captive. Pope Gregory prayed for the king
of Bujaya, and assured him of his love for him. The very fact that
there were already some Christians held captives showed that at some

point in history, the Muslim-Christian relations suffered some ruptures

after the death of Prophet Muhammad.
On the Christian side it is on record that “when the first Muslims were
being persecuted in Mecca, a group of 83 Muslim men and women
took refuge in Ethiopia. Because of the Ethiopian Emperor‟s
kindness to these Muslims Muhammad offered special prayers when
he heard of the Emperor‟s death. From this, one can deduce that
Muslim-Christian relations began to suffer friction and tensions after
the death of Muhammad and the early Popes and Kings. This rupture
in Muslim-Christian relations happened when the Arabs started their
conquests in the Middle East and North Africa. At the time in
question, Christians were still living among Muslims in the
predominantly Muslim countries like Syria and Egypt. In the land
conquered by the Arabs Muslims did not force Christians to change
their faith. The saying, “Muhammad with the sword in one hand and
the Koran in the other”, was not true in this situation. The true
position was that Christians were allowed to continue as such but were
not full citizens of the Islamic empire (Nwanaju, 2005).
The Christian community was extinguished in the 12th century by the
extremist Muwahhid movement that came to power. This was in sharp
reaction to the crusade movements in Europe. The crusade movement
which was meant to stop further Muslim expansion, to recapture
land taken from them by the Arabs and to open up the way for the
pilgrims who complained that their access route to Jerusalem was
being blocked, was violent men who manhandled not only the Muslim
but also Christians in the Middle East. The Muslim-Christian
relations at this point became so ruptured that all attempts made by
the Franciscans and the Dominicans positive preachers to rectify the
relationship ended in fiasco. Since then, the Muslims and Christians
kept their distance until the 19th century and the era of colonialism.
According to Mala (1985), there is a prelude to understanding the
Nigerian situation. Firstly, Christians and Muslims have co-existed
since the late 19th century, although it was in the late 20th century
that most people in the eastern parts of the country first encountered

AFRREV
problems
the Muslims. Secondly, the two communities are the group that
dominated the decision-making bodies in the country. Thirdly, the
major ethnic groups are always identified by the religion to which
most of their members belong, for instance, the Hausa-Fulani and Ibo
people are identified as, and are in fact predominantly Muslims and
Christians respectively. Lastly, the political, economic, social and
resinous structures in Nigeria as in most part of Africa are such that
Muslims and Christians have no alternative but to co-operate, and are
co-operating together, in order to build a peaceful, strong and united
country. In this brief survey, the scope shall not be limited to Nigeria
since we are fully aware that Islam and Christianity came to Nigeria
from outside (Kenny, 1982).
There was stiff resistance to the missionaries who attempted to
Christianize the Muslims. As a result of these, there is great
educational imbalance between Muslims and non-Muslims in the
country today. But in Yoruba land, Muslims had a few scruples
attending Christian schools. Christianity was closely associated with
modernization and Islam with traditional society. So the people opted
for these religions on these grounds. As a result, it was not surprising
that many Muslim students became Christians. But the Ausar-ud-deen
and the Ahmadiyya did not stay arms folded; they opened Muslim
schools combining Islamic and western education.
The frictions in Muslim-Christian relations became very obvious
during the preparations for independence. While in the south,
movements were formed for independence, in the North, the Emirs
and politicians were not yet ready for independence. The response to
the demand of the West African Students Union in 1942 for co-
operation in gaining self-government was: “Holding this country
together is not possible except by means of the religion of the prophet.
If they want political unity let them follow our religion” (Kenny,
1982). In the North, non-Muslims refused to join the Northern
People‟s Congress (N.P.C.), the ruling party, because the leaders
openly identified the party with Islam. Even the first Northern
Nigerian government in 1951, dominated by N.P.C. did not appoint

Christians as ministers and even took steps to curtail missionary

activities in the educational and medical fields (Churkwulozie, 1983).
Although, all were concerned about consolidating the independence
status of Nigeria as at that time, there were still traces of tensions
between Muslims and Christians.
With the tremendous success achieved by the churches especially the
Catholic, the Sudan Interior Mission, the Sudan United Mission and
the Anglican, among the non-Muslim areas of the North, the Muslim
rulers became afraid, and therefore began to harass, and curtail the
work of these churches in these areas. It is on record how Ahmadu
Bello, the Sarduana of Sokoto and Premier of the North, also Vice-
President of the World Muslim League conducted conversion-oriented
rallies and building mosques and Quranic schools with grants from
Arab States (Shulman, 2009). For instance, the 1966 coup which
brought an Igbo, J.T.U. Aguiyi Ironsi to power was interpreted as a
kind of war between the Christian South and the Muslim North where
the assassinated Sarduana hailed from. This situation which had
become intricate and complex was having at its base, the tension that
had always been between Muslims and Christians. In September 1966,
the Igbo massacre in the North which sent the Igbos home to the East
was the last straw that broke the camel‟s back. There was a big gulf,
religious or otherwise, between a part of the South, and the North
(Nwanaju, 2005).
A second coup of 1966 brought Yakubu Gowon, a Northern Christian,
from the Middle Belt, to power. Gowon divided the country into 12
states and Chukwuemeka Ojukwu, Governor of the then Eastern State,
who did not buy the idea, seceded. In the “task-to keep-Nigeria-one”,
that ensured, Ojukwu, to gain outside support construed the war as a
“Jihad of Muslim hordes. “ According to Kenny (1982), the religious
overtones of the conflict had foundation in that the rioters in the North
directed their fury particularly against Christian churches, and no
compensation was ever made or action taken against organizers of the
riots. Moreover during the massacre any Igbo who declared himself a
Muslim had his life spared. During the war, the tension was at its low

AFRREV
problems
ebb since all were now very anxious to restore national unity and
solidarity. The post-war period experienced some changes for the
better for both Muslims and Christians.
With the introduction of the Universal Primary Education Scheme, the
teaching of religious education was made a compulsory subject in
schools with paid Muslim and Christian teachers. Another major
development that happened was that in Yoruba land, the government
took over all schools with the former religious proprietors still
retaining the schools “administration”. During these years, the post-
war spirit of apparent unity and peace was soon to open up new areas
of tensions in Muslim-Christian relations. An example of such was the
protest mounted by the Muslim Students Association against what
they called discriminatory government policies which favoured only
the Christians. These students complained that Christian religious
instruction was being forced on the Muslim students, that public
holidays declared for Muslim feasts were not being observed by the
Christian schools. With the coming to power of Murtala Muhammad
in 1973, Muslim-Christian relations took a new turn. Murtala, though
a Muslim, established diplomatic relations with the Vatican. Despite
his good intentions he did not live to see the Nigeria of his dreams. He
was assassinated in an abortive bloody coup. After the assassination of
Murtala, in February 1976, Olusegun Obasanjo, a Baptist, took over.
Certain events started happening at this time which made the
Christians suspect that all was yet to be well. For instance, the mass
condemnation of Gowon a Christian even without trial, the erection of
a Mosque and Qur‟anic school in Kano in memory of the deceased
Head of state, were cases in point (Nwanaju, 2005).
Another major tension came when the issue of Sharia was raised at
the time when the country was drafting a new constitution in
preparations for a return to civil rule. A majority of the Muslims
argued that the Sharia courts be provided for in the new constitution.
In the national seminar on Islam and the draft constitution in August
1977, the official position of the Muslims on this issue was laid
opened. The Muslims wanted Sharia in toto. This is because according

to them, the Muslim is subject to no other law than the Sharia.

Christians who sensed danger in this move provided counter
arguments (Ottuh, 2005).
Muslim-Christian Relations in Nigeria: Towards A Lasting
Solution
Both Muslims and Christians have made attempts at dialogue in the
past. These attempts were being made on different fronts unilaterally
either by Christians on the one hand or by the Muslims on the other
hand. Such efforts were made by the Anglican and Methodists
churches as far back 1952 when they sponsored a survey of Islam in
West Africa carried out by J.S. Trim Ingham (cited in Ottuh, 2005).
The result of this project was the birth of the Islam in Africa Project
(I. A. P.) with the aim to assist the churches to understand Islam. It all
started when delegates from many African churches met in Ibadan,
Nigeria in 1958. One of their requests was for “more intensive, study
and action in respect to the presentation of the Gospel to Muslims in
Africa”. In response to this request in 1959, the Islam in Africa
Project was founded. It was built on two principles: to encourage and
educate Christians of Africa to fulfil their responsibility towards the
Muslims and to liaise with all the churches to ensure unity in approach
to Islam. On the Muslim front, attempts have also been made,
although unlike the Christians, these moves were not official. Worthy
of mention are the then Sultan of Sokoto, Abubakar III who had
always been genuine in relating to Christians and his son,
Muhammadu Maciddo who had always co-operated with Christians,
despite the sharia issue.
On personal levels, efforts have been made by both Muslims and
Christians to relate by dialogue. But these moves as we have noted
were not official as such. The first official dialogue meeting that took
place between the Muslims and Christians was held on the 28th
November 1974 at the Pastoral Institute in Ibadan under the joint
chairmanship of F. A. Job and Lateef Adegbite, the then Western
State Attorney-General and commissioner of Justice. Although the
meeting was charged initially with a mood of tension and

Christian-Muslim Relations
AFRREV in Vol.3
IJAH, Nigeria:
(2) the problems
April, 2014 and Prospects
defensiveness on either side, several papers were given on the dignity

of man and role of religion in society. In this meeting, a committee of
five was set up and a journal, Nigerian dialogue, was launched to
publicize the content of the meetings. Another official attempt was
made in December 1978 when at Jos, under the auspices of the
National Catholic Bishops‟ Conference Chukwulozie organized a
dialogue meeting at a national level. In the meeting, it was advocated
that Christian-Muslim committees in every state in the country should
be set up. Such committees were never created, and even where they
had existed, like the Jos, as at that time of this dialogue meeting, the
committees were dormant (Churkwulozie, 1983). Just as dialogue
between Muslims and Christians has been going on both on official
and un-official levels, and in different areas, so also there had been
several levels at which common actions by Muslims and Christians
had been happening. On the local level, Muslim-Christian relation had
been necessitated by the mutual desire to solve the burning issues of
life. This could be noticed in community projects social activities,
initiations, marriages, burials; these had always been avenues for
common actions by Muslim and Christians. Moreover, there are social
ties that exist between Muslims and Christians. Family ties,
friendship, political affiliations have created such situations as to
make an alternative to co-operation between Muslim and Christians
incomprehensible and un-imaginable.
When God wanted to create man as recorded in the Christian Bible,
He said, ”let us make man in our own to image, after our likeness”
(Gen. 26). A critical examination of the Trinitarian formula would
reveal that God had long sanctioned dialogue. God started dialogue
and wanted it to continue in love. In Qur‟an 29:46, it is said, “Our
God and your God is one, and to Him we have surrendered‟‟, so what
is the basis for the tension between Muslims and Christians? The
Christians are admonished in 1cor. 16:14: “let all that you do be done
in love”. Christ told the Christians in the Bible; “Judge not, that you
be not judge. For with the judgment you pronounce you will be
judged, and the measure you give will be the measure you get” (Matt.
7:1-2). Hence there is no reason for judging our brother and sister of

other faiths. The Quran is very clear in the following and other
passages on relations between people in the world; “O mankind;
surely we have created you from a male and female, and made you
tribes and families that you may known each other, surely the noblest
of you with God is the most dutiful of you. God is All-knowing, All-
aware” (Qur‟an.49:13).
Like the past military regimes have done, the government, especially
the federal government should always try to steer the middle course.
The federal government should never give the impression by actions
or words, that one religion supersedes the other. The admission of
Nigeria into the Organization of Islamic Conference shows that the
federal government was not cautious enough on this issue. Nigeria is
not an Islamic state and one wonders the rationale that motivated an
official government delegation to attend and seek admission into the
Islamic Conference Organization. The federal government, as much as
possible should avoid such actions that would create the impression
that Nigeria is an Islamic state. The federal and state government
should always create conducive atmosphere for all religions to operate
hitch free in the country. It is true, however, that on such major feast
days, as Christmas, Easter, Id-al-Alha, Id-al fitri, Mewled al-Nabiyy,
Independence Day, the President or Head of State had always stressed
religious tolerance. The government at all levels should now stress
good relations which is more meaningful in the Nigerian context.
Moreover, polemics often adopted by religious leaders to cast
aspersions on some doctrines of other religious should be abhorred.
This is why education is needed even at the local level because if the
apparent exegetical differences in these doctrinal trends are well
elucidated, then there will hardly be any room for misunderstanding.
One has to understand one‟s faith first, in order to be able to
appreciate the differences in these faiths. Similarities should be
stressed rather than the differences. With such understanding archived
with good education, the Muslims and the Christians will be better
placed to enter into dialogue. It is a fact that the formal dialogue
meetings that have been had between Muslims and Christians have

AFRREV
Relations Vol.3 (2)
in Nigeria: theApril, 2014and Prospects
problems
not achieved much success because the educational groundwork was

lacking.
Africans naturally exist according to the principle of communalism
which can never be alien to them. An African would always return to
his roots. In an authentic, undiluted and unadulterated African, there is
always that accommodating spirit. Notwithstanding, the historical
cause of intertribal wars and other dissensions leading to bloodshed,
the philosophy of individualism ought to have no place among
Nigerians. By accidents of birth, Nigerians have found themselves in
the different religions; some professes Islam, others Christianity,
others the African Religion, some others still in other religions. Thus
the Muslims and Christians are Africans, and if they understand who
they are as Africans, then we shall have few problems in Muslim-
Christian relations.
Conclusion
Spiritual and religious traditions are sources of values that can defend
dignified life for all; these traditions need to be explored. Nigerians
need new ways to understand particularity, universality and
plurality; one must learn to live his faith with integrity while
respecting and accepting each other as they are. Cordial Muslim-
Christian relations in Nigerian can be a reality. In the beginning, there
was peace. At a point, there was a rupture which has been affecting
Muslim-Christian relations till date. Records of such histories are
preserved so that they serve as reference codes for the present and
future generations. But some Nigerian Muslim and Christians are
learning but not learning fast; others are not ready to learn. This issue
therefore can only be hypothetical: if the Muslims and the Christians
are ready to learn from the positive part of history and adopt the
recommended attitude towards Muslim-Christian relations, then
Muslim-Christian relations can be a reality.

References
Berret, D.B. (1983). World Christian Encyclopaedia. Nairobi: OUP
CIA World Fact Book (2012). Accessed on February 03, 2013 from
at.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ni.html
Churkwulozie, V.C. (1983). “Christians - Muslims Dialogue and
Philosophy in the African Context”, Nigerian Dialogue, 4(4),
134
Francis, D. (2005). Civil militia: Africa's intractable security menace?
London: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
Kenny, J. (1982). “Christians and Muslims in Nigeria: A Case of
Competitive Sharing”, Nigerian Dialogue, 4(4), 33
Jones, C. (2005). The View from Mars Hill: Christianity in the
Landscape of World Religions. Cambridge: Cowley
Publications.
Mala, S.B. (1985). “Common Actions among Christians and Muslims:
The Nigerian Experience.” In: Dobers, H., et al (eds),
Development and Solidarity. Mainze: Hase and Koehier
Verlag, Ch. 6, p.131
Mala, S.B. (1985). Principles of Dialogue: Texts and Notations and
Inter-religious Relations. Ibadan: Mimeographs
Macdonald, A.N. (ed.) (1912). Chambers Twentieth Century
Dictionary. Edinburgh: Chambers Ltd.
Nwanaju, I. (2005). Christian-Muslim Relations in Nigeria, Lagos:
Free-Enterprises Publication.
Onimhawo, J. A. & Ottuh, P.O.O. (2009). Some Thoughts in
Sociology of Religion. Benin City: Ever-blessed Publication
Onimhawo, J.O. & Ottuh, P.O.O. (2003). “The Role of Religion
Towards Peaceful Co-Existence in Nigeria,” Epha: Ekpoma
Journal of Religious Studies, 5(1 & 2), 67-82

AFRREV
problems
Osasona, J.O. (June, 2002). “Muslim-Christian Relations in the Days

of Islam,” Epha: Ekpoma Journal of Religious Studies,
4(1&2), 119
Ottuh, P.O.O. (2005) “Sharia Law and Human Values in Nigeria: A
Critical Appraisal”, M.A. Dissertation (Unpublished),
Ekpoma: Ambrose Alli University.
Shulman, L.E. (2009). “Why Inter-faith Dialogue?” at
http://www.interfaith-metrodc.org/ifc.htm (assessed 2/3/2014)
Rousseau, R.W. (ed.) (1985). Christianity and Islam: The Strangling
Dialogue. London: Ridge Row Press
Ugwoji, M.C. (2008). "Interreligious Relations And Solidarity:
Contextualizing the Vision of Francis Cardinal Arinze for
religious education in Nigeria" at
www.fordham.bepress.com/dissertations/AAI3342755
(accessed 2/2/2010)


Inter-Religious Relations in Nigeria

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Inter-Religious Relations in Nigeria

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Inter-Religious Relations in Nigeria

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

AFRREV IJAH, Vol.

3 (2) April, 2014

Christian – Muslim Relations in Nigeria: The

Ottuh, John A., Ph.D.

Copyright © IAARR 2014: www.afrrevjo.net/ijah 46

Copyright © IAARR 2014: www.afrrevjo.net/ijah 47

millions, even a billion people, there must be some truth in them or if

Copyright © IAARR 2014: www.afrrevjo.net/ijah 48

Copyright © IAARR 2014: www.afrrevjo.net/ijah 49

Some Christians on the other hand feel offended by the teachings of

Copyright © IAARR 2014: www.afrrevjo.net/ijah 50

percent) rise of Muslims (Ottuh and Onimhawo, 2003). There has

Copyright © IAARR 2014: www.afrrevjo.net/ijah 51

fanatic or a bigot is to be an extremist. This attitude which has often

Copyright © IAARR 2014: www.afrrevjo.net/ijah 52

point in history, the Muslim-Christian relations suffered some ruptures

Copyright © IAARR 2014: www.afrrevjo.net/ijah 53

Copyright © IAARR 2014: www.afrrevjo.net/ijah 54

Christians as ministers and even took steps to curtail missionary

Copyright © IAARR 2014: www.afrrevjo.net/ijah 55

Copyright © IAARR 2014: www.afrrevjo.net/ijah 56

to them, the Muslim is subject to no other law than the Sharia.

Copyright © IAARR 2014: www.afrrevjo.net/ijah 57

defensiveness on either side, several papers were given on the dignity

Copyright © IAARR 2014: www.afrrevjo.net/ijah 58

Copyright © IAARR 2014: www.afrrevjo.net/ijah 59

not achieved much success because the educational groundwork was

Copyright © IAARR 2014: www.afrrevjo.net/ijah 60

Copyright © IAARR 2014: www.afrrevjo.net/ijah 61

Osasona, J.O. (June, 2002). “Muslim-Christian Relations in the Days

Copyright © IAARR 2014: www.afrrevjo.net/ijah 62

You might also like