Summary and Conclusions: - . - The Diagnosis and Understanding of Schizophrenia
Summary and Conclusions: - . - The Diagnosis and Understanding of Schizophrenia
In this series of reports, we have described an their severity, their rank order, or their mere presence.
approach to understanding the relationship between the At present, none of the alternative methods is clearly
symptoms and concept of schizophrenia. Symptoms are superior to the others. Each has very different clinical
used as major criteria by investigators to arrive at a and statistical implications and affects the way data are
diagnosis of schizophrenia. A t the same time, variability translated into conclusions. The choice among the
regarding which symptoms a're considered as diagnostic methods will have to be made on the basis of the ability
criteria has, in the past, made comparisons of patients of their results to relate to the basic clinical factors:
difficult. Using data collected by psychiatrists from nine etiology, response to treatment, and prognosis.
nations in the International Pilot Study of Schizo- The symptoms of schizophrenia also serve to provide
phrenia, it is possible to go beyond previous symptom clues regarding the nature of the underlying pathological
lists of diagnostic criteria from particular centers and, processes involved. A review of findings suggests that the
based on the way the concept of schizophrenia is used, processes underlying these symptoms are less discrete
to describe 12 discriminating symptoms as diagnostic from other disorders and from normal function than was
criteria that apply in many different cultural settings. originally assumed. This review also suggests that the
These symptoms can be readily used by clinicians and manifestations of schizophrenia can usefully be
researchers to define patients who will be widely categorized into the following three groups: positive
considered schizophrenic. symptoms, a group of symptoms including delusions and
Proceeding beyond diagnostic criteria that are based hallucinations that appear to have relatively little
on key symptoms, it is important to describe a broader specific relationship to antecedents or prognosis; nega-
range of the characteristics of patients who have these tive symptoms, including blunted affect, apathy and
symptoms. In the second part of this series, we kinds of formal thought disorder, such as blocking,
presented several alternative methods for describing and which are related in a manner to be determined with
comparing patients with symptoms of schizophrenia and chronicity; and disorder of personal relationships, which
for determining subgroups. These methods differ regard- appears to be a relatively independent continuing
ing three basic principles for determining profiles and process that also has prognostic implications for the
defining diagnostic groups: 1) whether the data them- outcome of positive and negative symptoms. It is
selves will contribute to determining which patients are important to clarify the relationships among these three
considered similar or whether diagnostic groups and types of manifestations and to determine further their
subgroups will be determined primarily from a priori etiologies and responses to treatment.
concepts; 2) whether all symptoms are considered From this series of reports, the relationship between
equally important for diagnosis or whether some are symptoms and schizophrenia emerges as follows: 1)
counted as more important than others; and 3) which Discriminating symptoms for diagnostic purposes can be
aspect of the patient's characteristics is considered described and can form a valuable foundation for
diagnostically most crucial, the pattern of symptoms, research and clinical comparison. 2) Broader profiles,
ISSUE NO. 11, WINTER 1974 71
extending beyond the 12 discriminating symptoms, Babigian, H. M.; Gardner, E. H.; Miles, H. C ; and
provide a more complete picture and a means for Romano, J. Diagnostic consistency and change in a
comparison of the people being studied. Alternative follow-up study of 1215 patients. American Journal of
methods for describing and comparing these profiles Psychiatry, 121:895-901, 1965.
have important relationships to clinical assumptions and Bartko, J. J.; Strauss, J. S.; and Carpenter, W. T. An
the interpretation of findings. 3) The processes under- evaluation of taxonometric techniques for psychiatric
lying schizophrenic symptoms appear to reflect extremes data. The Classification Society Bulletin, 2(3):1-29,
Carpenter, W. T., Jr., and Strauss, J. S. Cross-cultural Fish, F. J. Schizophrenia. Bristol: John Wright and
evaluation of Schneider's first-rank symptoms of schizo- Sons, Ltd., 1962.
phrenia: A report from the International Pilot Study of Fleiss, J. E., and Zubin, J. On the methods and
Schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, theory of clustering. Multivariate Behavioral Research,
131(6):682-687, 1974. 4:235-250,1969.
Carpenter, W. T., Jr.; Strauss, J. S.; and Bartko, J. J. Freeman, T. Symptomatology, diagnosis and course.
Flexible system for the diagnosis of schizophrenia: In: Bellak, L., and Loeb, L., eds. The Schizophrenic
Jansson, B. The prognostic significance of various Lane, E. A., and Albee, G. W. Intellectual antecedents
types of hallucinations in young people. Acta of schizophrenia. In: Roff, M., and Ricks, D. F., eds.
Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 44:401-409, 1968. Life History Research in Psychopathology. Vol. I.
Jaspers, K. General Psychopathology. Translated by Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press, 1970.
J. Hoenig and M. W. Hamilton. Chicago: The University pp. 189-207.
of Chicago Press, 1963. Langfeldt, G. The Prognosis in Schizophrenia and the
Kasanin, J. S. Developmental roots of schizophrenia. Factors Influencing the Course of the Disease. Copen-
Life History Research in Psychopathology, New York, diagnosis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 125:12-21,
N.Y., 1972. 1969.
Sacks, M.; Carpenter, W. T., Jr.; and Strauss, J. Stierlin, H. Individual therapy of schizophrenic
Recovery from delusions: Three phases documented by patients and hospital structure. In: Burton, A., ed.
patients' interpretation of research procedures. Archives Psychotherapy of the Psychoses. New York: Basic
of General Psychiatry, 30:117-120, 1974. Books, Inc., Publishers, 1961. pp. 329-348.
Salzman, L. F.; Goldstein, R. H.; Atkins, R.; and Stierlin, H. Conflict and Reconciliation. New York:
adults. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, forms of thinking. Archives of General Psychiatry,
155(1 ):42-54, 1972. 9:199-206,1963.
Wing, J. K. Institutionalism in mental hospitals.
British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology,
1:38-51,1962. Acknowledgment
Wing, J. K.> and Brown, G. W. Institutionalism and
Schizophrenia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, This three-part report is based partly on the data and
An international workshop will be held September 24-27, 1975, at Capri, Italy, to assess the impact of recent
research advances on the problem of schizophrenia. Held under the auspices of the University of Naples, the workshop
will deal with such topics as: definition, classification, and nomenclature; epidemiology and sociology; genetics and
biochemistry; pharmacology of hallucinogens and drug-induced psychoses; and pharmacological and psychological
approaches. Scheduled speakers include: S. Arieti (New York), A. Carlsson (Goteborg), C. L. Cazzullo (Milan), S. S.
Ke'ty (Boston), T. Lambo (Geneva), I. Matte Blanco (Rome),M. Munkvad (Roskilde), A. Pletscher (Basel), D. Rochter
(London), H. A. Rosenfeld (London), N. Sartorius (Geneva), M. Shepherd (London), J. Shields (London), and R.
Tissot (Geneva). For further information, write: Dr. D. Kemali, Cattedra di Psichiatria, I Facolta di Medicina e
Chirurgia, Universita di Napoli, Piazza Miraglia, 2, 80138 Napoli, Italy.
76 SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN
Scoring:
0 None or no abnormal explanation (specify which)
1 Uncertain, but suspects some abnormal mechanism
2 Firm delusional belief
Mean for total items .76
Persecutory ideas Have you been particularly singled out for persecution? .88
Do you think people want to harm you? .91
Do you think that somebody is following you around, or spying on you? .82
Do you think that some force is trying to harm you? .77
Is there any particular person trying to harm you? .78
Have you recently been suspicious about people's intentions toward you? .89
Poor rapport Did the interviewer find it possible to establish good rapport with the
patient during the interview? .86
Other difficulties in rapport .75
ISSUE NO. 11, WINTER 1974 77
Appendix I—Continued
Preoccupied with delusions How much of the time is the patient preoccupied with delusions? .88
Thoughts aloud Do you feel your thoughts are being broadcast, transmitted, so that
Waking early (-) Have you been waking earlier in the morning and remained awake? .83
Thought alienation Do you feel as if your thoughts were being taken away, so that your mind is
a complete .blank? .91
Are thoughts put into your mind that you know are not your own? .89
Apophany Have you felt that people change their appearance in some puzzling way? .82
Have people seemed to be acting a part, as though they were in a play? .89
Do you see people around whom you recognize from earlier in your life, but
who say they could not have seen you before? .90
Do you feel you're being tested in some way? .90
Are there people around who are not what they seem to be, who are perhaps
in disguise? .92
Delusional mood .59
Unreliable information Was the information obtained in this interview credible or not? .73
Appendix I—Continued
Vagueness Patient talks so vaguely that information given is of little or no value .58
Patient fails to generalize and describes only constituent details and
Lack of affective reaction How do you feel about these experiences? .84
to disordered thoughts
(Rate the patient's affective reaction to abnormal experiences)
Scoring:
0 Strong affective reaction present
1 Mild affective reaction only
2 No affective reaction whatever (indifferent)
N A No subjective experience of disordered thought
Voices arguing Do you ever hear several voices speaking about you among themselves with-
out talking directly to you? .76
Appendix I—Continued
Thought intrusion Are thoughts put into your mind that you know are not your own? .89
Can you tell the difference between your own thoughts and the other
Audible thoughts Do they sometimes repeat the same sentence many times? .84
Do they repeat something that you have just thought?- .,.•• .89
Do you ever seem to hear your, thoughts spokenaloud (almost-as if someone
standing nearby could hear them)? ' .74
Stereo typic Frequent repetition of one or more stereotyped phrases; e.g., "I'm not
coming the old Isaacs" or " I t doesn't prove power to any patients."
(Do not include frequent reversion to certain themes or topics) .71
Made feelings Do you feel that you are made to want things that you would not want
yourself? .76
Incoherent speech
Rate free and spontaneous flow in incoherent speech .74
Neologisms
Patient makes up words that have no generally accepted meaning (Do not
include ordinary words used with an idiosyncratic meaning) .66
Thought withdrawal Do you feel as if your thoughts were being taken away, so that your mind
is a complete blank? .91
Hallucinated voices speak What sort of things do they say? Single syllables or words or sentences? .79
sentences
Hallucinated voices sound Can you tell the voices from normal voices? .75
human
Nonverbal auditory Do you ever hear other noises for which you cannot account? .87
hallucinations Do you ever hear music when none is being played? .76