Course MulticultureI
Course MulticultureI
Course MulticultureI
Course I
There are various examples and interesting experiments in social psychology, ethnic
stereotypes about nature and how to reduce them. One of the interesting experiments
measuring psychological stereotypes was conducted in 1933 in USA by Katz and Bradly
(cf.Bourchis and Leyens, 1997, pp 99-102). Students at Princeton have been asked to
present the most characteristic features of the Americans, blacks, Chinese, Japanese,
Irish, Italians, Jews and Turks Japanese. Based on the responses was made a list of 84
personality traits. They then asked other students to choose from the list of the five most
representative of each category. Besides various characteristics it found that each
category corresponds to certain characteristics that are actually stable result of the process
of stereotyping. Some of the attributes associated with the various call t: American
(white) workers, intelligent, materialistic / American (black) superstiţio and lazy i,
musical sense / German: scientific workers, impassive / Japanese: intelligent, workers,
etc. perfidious
Stereotypes arise due to the way information processing, namely what is defined as
cognitive psychology phenomenon of increased contrast. Thus, what is unusual or
different from us or else we would expect to be, it is always subject to the phenomenon of
emphasizing the contrast. Thus, we remember better, or we transmit to others the
message that I received. An experience of a certain kind can distort reality, we continue
to judge similar situations as the one that marked us respectable judgment at the time. A
social psychology experiment conducted also in the United States in interpreting a scene
specially directed. So a group of students watched a film about a fight in a subway
between a well-dressed black and white which was holding a knife. Their task was to
watch the film (short) scene and then tell another person who has not seen the film, sour
turn the story a third party. After several repetitions of this kind, it was revealed that the
story was different (obviously the reproduced via mobile wireless) - namely, the scene of
a subway referred to the aggressive behavior of a black against a white well-dressed. Of
course such stereotypes appear in contexts educaţioanle not often we tend to have certain
prejudices about students lazy, undisciplined, etc.
Examine the situation only once you know all the details,
Judge a person after he is said and done (not after someone sent you or after you wait)
1. facial expressions 13. conduct self
2. religious beliefs 14. Gast r onoma
3. religious rituals 15. The eating habits
4. The concept of personal 16. tradition holidays
space
5. paintings 17. Designed for friendship
6. The system of values 18. The work ethic
7. Literature 19. The concept of beauty
8. Parenting strategies 20. Music
9. social organization 21. importance of time
10. Differentiation of social 22. The concept of justice
classes
11. physical gestures 23. Intergenerational
relations
12. Altruism (helping others) 24. Family Relations
3. Cultural relativism
To emphasize that there is no culture "better" or "less good", we consider the theoretical
principle of cultural relativism, which has a powerful and practical dimension aiming
interpretation of world cultures and mutual relations between them. Thus, it is
particularly relevant in the context of judging values and functionality immanent, and not
by criteria other cultures. When referring to customs, traditions of peoples, we agree that
there are various contradictions and bizarre elements that could be considered oddities for
those from other cultures. The boundary between "good - evil", "civilized - back" or
"traditional - modern" is dependent on how each and every individual Culture, and relate
to universal standards, partially shared in common. It is to accept the criterion of
relativity based on openness, perhaps even curiosity, but more tolerance to allow
intercultural communication.
The society in which we live helps us have a behavior desirable or rather intolerant ?
Looking at the issue from the perspective of social, we believe that any person is, in a
greater or lesser exposed to conjecture social him / her determined to have prejudices, to
form stereotypes to label certain individuals, cultures, ethnicities and act accordingly,
thereby maintaining or transmitting others such behavior. How aware these things, trying
to control them both at a personal and social future of our society depends. Therefore,
trainers are extremely important educational influences that they convey and how they
influence the educational field.
Exercise witnessed a quarrel in the school yard where a group of children laughing at
another mulatto child who called him "chocolate". 1) What
2) If you should choose a percentage of teachers (100%) of school for each response that
would be it for each behavior below? How will you react?
a) you find funny and you think you are children, just tease
b) find a concrete way to intervene on time explaining to students that it's not what I'm
doing
c) the next time you cry as the student mulatto but find something for others to know
what it's like
d) the next time with those students will try to attack the problem explaining it's not what
I'm doing
e) the next hour with other students try to do some exercises to eliminate "labeling"
f) will not care what happens in school, the matter must be traveled, nothing else is
important
g) discuss with the director trying to propose a draft with few cultural education classes
To become a teacher practicing intercultural education is essential participation in a
training of trainers to prepare them to become "true cultural mediators and agents of
change" (Cucos 2000, 204) and which includes:
- Knowledge of social and human sciences: stereotypes, prejudices minorities
- teaching strategies differentiated according to pupils' cultural capital
- cultural identity and intergroup attitudes
- knowledge and strategies for inter-knowledge
- communication and positive conflict resolution
A teacher who wishes to be a promoter of intercultural education must, as the JA Banks
(1988 in Cucos, 2000, p. 205) be willing to:
1. accept and change their attitudes, concepts, attitudes, and beliefs
2. experience new emotional experiences
3. to revalue rules, models of moral, political and scientific
4. to redirect their value judgments and judgments
5. to learn new behaviors and interpersonal styles of interaction
6. learn new strategies for self-knowledge and knowing
7. wish to convey these dimensions pupils and others.
1