Scribd
Upload
30 views4 pages

Lampiran 6 Probit Analysis Data Information

1) Probit analysis was conducted on data from an experiment with 12 cases and 2 control groups to determine the relationship between concentration (Konsentrasi) and response. 2) The probit model found concentration to be a significant predictor of response. 3) Confidence limits and probabilities for various concentrations are provided, as well as a graph of the probit relationship between concentration and response.

Uploaded by

Bimby Nasya
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
30 views4 pages

Lampiran 6 Probit Analysis Data Information

1) Probit analysis was conducted on data from an experiment with 12 cases and 2 control groups to determine the relationship between concentration (Konsentrasi) and response. 2) The probit model found concentration to be a significant predictor of response. 3) Confidence limits and probabilities for various concentrations are provided, as well as a graph of the probit relationship between concentration and response.

Uploaded by

Bimby Nasya
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

43

Lampiran 6

Probit Analysis

Data Information
N of Cases
Valid 12
Rejected Missing 0
Number of Responses > 0
Number of Subjects
Control Group 2

Convergence Information
Number of Optimal
Iterations Solution Found
PROBIT 13 Yes

Parameter Estimates
Parameter 95% Confidence
Interval
Estimat Std. Lower Upper
e Error Z Sig. Bound Bound
PROBITa Konsentrasi 2,169 ,261 8,325 ,000 1,659 2,680
Intercept -1,407 ,167 - ,000 -1,573 -1,240
8,437
a. PROBIT model: PROBIT(p) = Intercept + BX
44

Chi-Square Tests
Chi-Square dfa Sig.
PROBIT Pearson Goodness-of-Fit 8,450 10 ,585b
Test
a. Statistics based on individual cases differ from statistics based on
aggregated cases.
b. Since the significance level is greater than ,150, no heterogeneity factor is
used in the calculation of confidence limits.

Cell Counts and Residuals


Nu
mb Number of Observed Expected
er Konsentrasi Subjects Responses Responses Residual Probability
PROBIT 1 1.000 25 17 19.428 -2.428 .777
2 .800 25 15 15.720 -.720 .629
3 .600 25 12 11.453 .547 .458
4 .400 25 9 7.373 1.627 .295
5 .200 25 5 4.133 .867 .165
6 .000 25 0 1.994 -1.994 .080
7 1.000 25 19 19.428 -.428 .777
8 .800 25 17 15.720 1.280 .629
9 .600 25 12 11.453 .547 .458
10 .400 25 9 7.373 1.627 .295
11 .200 25 6 4.133 1.867 .165
12 .000 25 0 1.994 -1.994 .080
45

Confidence Limits
Probability 95% Confidence Limits for
Konsentrasi
Lower Upper
Estimate Bound Bound
PROBIT ,010 -,424 -,738 -,225
,020 -,298 -,575 -,122
,030 -,219 -,472 -,056
,040 -,159 -,395 -,007
,050 -,110 -,332 ,034
,060 -,068 -,279 ,068
,070 -,032 -,232 ,099
,080 ,001 -,190 ,126
,090 ,030 -,153 ,151
,100 ,058 -,118 ,174
,150 ,171 ,025 ,270
,200 ,260 ,137 ,349
,250 ,338 ,231 ,418
,300 ,407 ,314 ,482
,350 ,471 ,388 ,544
di ,400 ,532 ,455 ,605
me ,450 ,591 ,517 ,668
nsi ,500 ,648 ,576 ,732
on ,550 ,706 ,632 ,798
1 ,600 ,765 ,687 ,868
,650 ,826 ,742 ,942
,700 ,890 ,798 1,021
,750 ,959 ,858 1,107
,800 1,036 ,924 1,205
,850 1,126 1,000 1,319
,900 1,239 1,094 1,464
,910 1,267 1,117 1,499
,920 1,296 1,141 1,537
,930 1,329 1,168 1,580
,940 1,365 1,198 1,627
,950 1,407 1,233 1,680
,960 1,456 1,273 1,743
,970 1,516 1,322 1,821
,980 1,595 1,387 1,925
,990 1,721 1,490 2,088
46

Grafik Probit
1
Probit

0.5

0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2
Konsentrasi

You might also like