How International Trade Works

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

How International Trade Works

International trade gives rise to a world economy, in which supply and


demand, and therefore prices, both affect and are affected by global events.
Political change in Asia, for example, could result in an increase in the cost of
labor, thereby increasing the manufacturing costs for an American sneaker
company based in Malaysia, which would then result in an increase in the
price charged at your local mall. A decrease in the cost of labor, on the other
hand, would likely result in you having to pay less for your new shoes.

A product that is sold to the global market is called an export, and a product
that is bought from the global market is an import. Imports and exports are
accounted for in a country's current account in the balance of payments.

Comparative Advantage: Increased Efficiency of Trading


Globally
Global trade allows wealthy countries to use their resources—whether labor,
technology or capital—more efficiently. Because countries are endowed with
different assets and natural resources (land, labor, capital, and technology),
some countries may produce the same good more efficiently and therefore
sell it more cheaply than other countries. If a country cannot efficiently
produce an item, it can obtain the it by trading with another country that can.
This is known as specialization in international trade.

Let's take a simple example. Country A and Country B both produce cotton
sweaters and wine. Country A produces ten sweaters and six bottles of wine a
year while Country B produces six sweaters and ten bottles of wine a year.
Both can produce a total of 16 units. Country A, however, takes three hours to
produce the ten sweaters and two hours to produce the six bottles of wine
(total of five hours). Country B, on the other hand, takes one hour to produce
ten sweaters and three hours to produce six bottles of wine (a total of four
hours).

But these two countries realize that they could produce more by focusing on
those products with which they have a comparative advantage. Country A
then begins to produce only wine, and Country B produces only cotton
sweaters. Each country can now create a specialized output of 20 units per
year and trade equal proportions of both products. As such, each country now
has access to 20 units of both products.

We can see then that for both countries, the opportunity cost of producing
both products is greater than the cost of specializing. More specifically, for
each country, the opportunity cost of producing 16 units of both sweaters and
wine is 20 units of both products (after trading). Specialization reduces their
opportunity cost and therefore maximizes their efficiency in acquiring the
goods they need. With the greater supply, the price of each product would
decrease, thus giving an advantage to the end consumer as well.

Note that, in the example above, Country B could produce both wine and
cotton more efficiently than Country A (less time). This is called an absolute
advantage, and Country B may have it because of a higher level of
technology.

 
According to the international trade theory, even if a country has an absolute
advantage over another, it can still benefit from specialization.
Origins of Comparative Advantage
The law of comparative advantage is popularly attributed to English political
economist David Ricardo. It's discussed in his book “On the Principles of
Political Economy and Taxation” published in 1817, although it has been
suggested that Ricardo's mentor, James Mill, likely originated the analysis.

David Ricardo famously showed how England and Portugal both benefit by
specializing and trading according to their comparative advantages. In this
case, Portugal was able to make wine at a low cost, while England was able
to cheaply manufacture cloth. Ricardo predicted that each country would
eventually recognize these facts and stop attempting to make the product that
was more costly to generate.

Indeed, as time went on, England stopped producing wine, and Portugal
stopped manufacturing cloth. Both countries saw that it was to their advantage
to stop their efforts at producing these items at home and, instead, to trade
with each other.

Some scholars have recently argued that Ricardo did not actually come up
with comparative advantage. Instead, the idea may have been inserted by his
editor, the political economist and moral philosopher James Mill.
A contemporary example is China’s comparative advantage with the United
States in the form of cheap labor. Chinese workers produce simple consumer
goods at a much lower opportunity cost. The United States’ comparative
advantage is in specialized, capital-intensive labor. American workers produce
sophisticated goods or investment opportunities at lower opportunity costs.
Specializing and trading along these lines benefits each.

The theory of comparative advantage helps to explain why protectionism has


been traditionally unsuccessful. If a country removes itself from an
international trade agreement, or if a government imposes tariffs, it may
produce an immediate local benefit in the form of new jobs and industry.
However, this is often not a long-term solution to a trade problem. Eventually,
that country will grow to be at a disadvantage relative to its neighbors:
countries that were already better able to produce these items at a lower
opportunity cost.

Criticisms of Comparative Advantage


Why doesn't the world have open trading between countries? When there is
free trade, why do some countries remain poor at the expense of others?
There are many reasons, but the most influential is something that economists
call rent-seeking. Rent-seeking occurs when one group organizes
and lobbies the government to protect its interests.

Say, for example, the producers of American shoes understand and agree
with the free-trade argument—but they also know that their narrow interests
would be negatively impacted by cheaper foreign shoes. Even if laborers
would be most productive by switching from making shoes to making
computers, nobody in the shoe industry wants to lose his or her job or
see profits decrease in the short run.

This desire could lead the shoemakers to lobby for special tax breaks for their
products and/or extra duties (or even outright bans) on foreign footwear.
Appeals to save American jobs and preserve a time-honored American craft
abound—even though, in the long run, American laborers would be made
relatively less productive and American consumers relatively poorer by such
protectionist tactics.

Other Possible Benefits of Trading Globally 


International trade not only results in increased efficiency but also allows
countries to participate in a global economy, encouraging the opportunity
for foreign direct investment (FDI), which is the amount of money that
individuals invest into foreign companies and assets. In theory, economies
can therefore grow more efficiently and can more easily become competitive
economic participants.

For the receiving government, FDI is a means by which foreign currency and


expertise can enter the country. It raises employment levels, and theoretically,
leads to a growth in gross domestic product. For the investor, FDI offers
company expansion and growth, which means higher revenues.

Free Trade Vs. Protectionism


As with all theories, there are opposing views. International trade has two
contrasting views regarding the level of control placed on trade: free trade and
protectionism. Free trade is the simpler of the two theories: a laissez-faire
approach, with no restrictions on trade. The main idea is that supply and
demand factors, operating on a global scale, will ensure that production
happens efficiently. Therefore, nothing needs to be done to protect or promote
trade and growth, because market forces will do so automatically.
In contrast, protectionism holds that regulation of international trade is
important to ensure that markets function properly. Advocates of this theory
believe that market inefficiencies may hamper the benefits of international
trade, and they aim to guide the market accordingly. Protectionism exists in
many different forms, but the most common are tariffs, subsidies, and quotas.
These strategies attempt to correct any inefficiency in the international market.

As it opens up the opportunity for specialization, and therefore more efficient


use of resources, international trade has the potential to maximize a country's
capacity to produce and acquire goods. Opponents of global free trade have
argued, however, that international trade still allows for inefficiencies that
leave developing nations compromised. What is certain is that the global
economy is in a state of continual change, and, as it develops, so too must its
participants.

You might also like