0% found this document useful (0 votes)
28 views20 pages

T Qe (Exp) Qe (Cal) r2 °C (MG/G) (MG/G) (%)

Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 20

T= 30 273.

15
R= 8.314
Ce mg/L qe mg/g
0 0 T qe (exp) qe (cal) r2
20 35 °C (mg/g) (mg/g) (%)
40 47 20 40.23 42.51 99.79
50 49 25 47 49.92 99.91
80 52 30 53.54 57.77 99.85
100 53 40 64.69 68.15 99.82
150 54

VALIDANDO MODELOS:

I. MODELOS LANGMUIR I

Y = A + B*X
X Y B A
1/Ceq 1/qe 0.23532175 0.01627571 qmax =
0.05 0.0285714 0.01944461 0.000491
0.025 0.0212766 R2 0.97341526 0.00068916 KL =
0.02 0.0204082 146.462248 4
0.0125 0.0192308 6.95601E-05 1.89974E-06
0.01 0.0188679
0.0066667 0.0185185

II. MODELO LANGMUIR II

Y = A + B*X
Y X B A
Ceq/qe Ceq 0.01714485 0.18369972 q max=
0.5714286 20 0.00028761 0.02446054
0.8510638 40 R2 0.99887566 0.03034656 KL=
1.0204082 50 3553.64186 4
1.5384615 80 3.27259748 0.00368365
1.8867925 100
2.7777778 150

III. MOLDELO DE FREUNDLICH

X Y Y = A + B*X
ln Ceq ln qe B A
2.9957323 3.5553481 0.20613939 3.02299122 n=
3.6888795 3.8501476 0.04472483 0.18566855
3.912023 3.8918203 R2 0.84154291 0.07194653 KF =
4.3820266 3.9512437 21.2434267 4
4.6051702 3.9702919 0.10996242 0.02070521
5.0106353 3.988984

3)A simple vista podemos observar que el modelo mas aceptablñe es Lagumir II
KL KF n r2
(l/mg) (mg/l.g) (%)
0.1474 18.7 5.98 73.3
0.125 21.4 5.92 82.45
0.0986 20.78 4.92 82.99
0.0686 31.32 6.33 74.05

qe(exp) vs. qe(cal.)


recta a 45°

qe(
Ceq qe (exp) qe( cal.)
60
0 0
61.441238 20 35 35.661047 50
40 47 45.128884 40

qe (cal.)
0.0691637 50 49 47.659561 30
80 52 52.036621
20
100 53 53.679945
150 54 56.039596 10
0
0 10 20
qe (

CALCULO DE VARIABLES TERMODIMANICAS

Ceq qe (exp) qe( cal.) ln K = A' + B'(1/T)


0 0
58.326553 20 35 37.979727 ln K 1/T
40 47 46.003782 -1.9146053 0.0034112
0.0933308 50 49 48.033406 -2.0794415 0.003354
80 52 51.437428 -2.316684 0.0032987 r2
100 53 52.681912 -2.6794627 0.0031934
150 54 54.438019
∆H = -29682.971
CAL ∆S = -117.06509
∆G = 5805.3102

EXP ∆G = 5977.3665

Ceq qe (exp) qe( cal.)


0 0
4.8510865 20 35 38.112017 qe(
40 47 43.96591 70
20.552677 50 49 46.035519 60
80 52 50.718945
50
100 53 53.106439
40

qe (cal.)
150 54 57.735978
30
20
10
0
0 10 20
qe
qe(exp) vs. qe(cal.)
60
50
40
qe (cal.)

qe(exp) vs. qe(cal.)


30
recta a 45°
20
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
qe (exp.)

ES TERMODIMANICAS
qe(exp) vs. qe(cal.)
60

B' A' 50
3570.239424964 -14.080477 40
qe (cal.)

142.1262977376 0.47119104 qe(exp) vs. qe(cal.)


30
0.996840561541 0.0228474 recta a 45°
631.0238826437 2 20
0.329396751285 0.00104401 10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
qe (exp.)
qe(exp) vs. qe(cal.)

qe (cal
30
recta a 45°
20
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
qe (exp.)

qe(exp) vs. qe(cal.)


70
60
50
40
qe (cal.)

qe(exp) vs. qe(cal.)


30 recta a 45°
20
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
qe (exp.)
e(exp) vs. qe(cal.)
ecta a 45°
e(exp) vs. qe(cal.)
ecta a 45°
Ce(mg/L) qe (mg/g) 1/Ce 1/qe Ce/qe ln(Ce) ln(qe )
0.2350 0.9530 4.2553 1.0493 0.2466 -1.4482 -0.0481
0.4620 1.3076 2.1645 0.7648 0.3533 -0.7722 0.2682
1.0000 1.8000 1.0000 0.5556 0.5556 0 0.5878
1.5360 2.0928 0.6510 0.4778 0.7339 0.4292 0.7385
2.5800 2.4840 0.3876 0.4026 1.0386 0.9478 0.9099
4.1800 3.1640 0.2392 0.3161 1.3211 1.4303 1.1518
6.0000 3.8000 0.1667 0.2632 1.5789 1.7918 1.3350

Langmuir1
1.2

1 f(x) = 0.182475163129663 x + 0.3159609145


R² = 0.958745831264493
0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5

3.16455696
5.47945205
Langmuir1 Langmuir2
1.8
1.6 f(x) = 0.230152654350889 x + 0.306755015767033
475163129663 x + 0.315960914541569 R² = 0.962589942397524
45831264493 1.4
1.2
Langmuir1
Linear (Langmuir1) 1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

f(x)
R² =

-2 -1.5
Langmuir 1 Langmuir 2 Freundlich
-2 -1.5

=3.1645*1.7 =4.344*0.75
Ce(mg/L) qe (mg/g) 31*Ce/(1+1. 03*Ce/(1+0.
=1.7605*(Ce
^(1/2.4177))
731*Ce) 7503*Ce)
0 0 0 0 0
0.2350 0.9530 0.91504468 0.65112888 0.96716257
0.4620 1.3076 1.40617288 1.11819019 1.27916481
1.0000 1.8000 2.00576694 1.86213975 1.7605
1.5360 2.0928 2.29960272 2.32584478 2.10247318
2.5800 2.4840 2.58555533 2.86432207 2.6054853
4.1800 3.1640 2.78025262 3.29377436 3.18100705
6.0000 3.8000 2.88657096 3.55444022 3.69395864
Langmuir2

x + 0.306755015767033

Langmuir2
Linear (Langmuir2)

4 5 6 7

Freundlich
1.6

1.4
f(x) = 0.413639660789958
1.2 x + 0.565590542807369
R² = 0.996936174114079
1
Freundlech
0.8 Linear (Freundlech)
0.6

0.4

0.2

0
-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
-0.2
0
-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
-0.2

q de los modelos vs q dato


4

3.5
q
3
d
e
2.5 Datos
l Linear (Datos)
o Langmuir 1
s 2
Langmuir 2
m Freundlich
o 1.5
d
e
l 1
o
s
0.5

0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
q datos
t min %α α
0 0 0
10 22 0.22
20 39 0.39
30 53 0.53
40 61 0.61
50 68 0.68
60 72 0.72
70 78 0.78
80 84 0.84
90 84 0.84
100 84 0.84

 0.9251

I. MODELO DE REACCION TOPOQUIMICA

1  (1   ) 1 / 3
x y Y = A*X
α
t A
0 0 0 0.00542844 0
10 0.22 0.0794836 0.00022973 #N/A
20 0.39 0.1519074 r2 0.98240566 0.04507611
30 0.53 0.222502 558.364696 10
40 0.61 0.2693856 1.13451636 0.02031855
50 0.68 0.3160096
60 0.72 0.3457867 K= 0.00542844
70 0.78 0.3963189
80 0.84 0.4571165
90 0.84 0.4571165
100 0.84 0.4571165

II. MODELO DE DIFUSION CONTROLADA

2
1   (1   ) 2 / 3
3

x y Y = A*X
t α A
0 0 0 0.00158175 0
10 0.22 0.0059829 4.60179E-05 #N/A
20 0.39 0.0207389 r2 0.99160693 0.00902937
30 0.53 0.0421635 1181.45978 10
40 0.61 0.059536 0.09632389 0.0008153
50 0.68 0.0788238
60 0.72 0.092005 K= 0.00158175
70 0.78 0.1155692
80 0.84 0.1452775
90 0.84 0.1452775
100 0.84 0.1452775

II. MODELO MOLINA


 ln( 1  )  kt 
  ln( 1  )

x y Y = A*X
t α A
0 0 0 0.02631111 0
10 0.22 0.2715622 0.00062384 #N/A
20 0.39 0.5474482 r2 0.99440978 0.12240559
30 0.53 0.8507629 1778.83851 10
40 0.61 1.0770118 26.6525656 0.14983128
50 0.68 1.3282355
60 0.72 1.5064042 K= 0.02631111
70 0.78 1.8524787
80 0.84 2.3860748
90 0.84 2.3860748
100 0.84 2.3860748

3)
α(exp) α(cal.) α(exp.) vs. α(calc.)
0 0 1
0.22 0.1541728 0.9
0.8
0.39 0.2916246 0.7
0.53 0.4133151 0.6
α(calc.)

0.61 0.5202043 0.5


0.4
0.68 0.6132519 0.3
0.72 0.6934176 0.2
0.1
0.78 0.7616614 0
0.84 0.8189428 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
0.84 0.8662219 α(exp.)
0.84 0.9044582
α(exp) vs. α(cal.) recta a 45°

α(exp) vs. α(cal.)


recta a 45°

kt α(exp) α(cal.) α(exp.) vs. α(calc.)


0 0 0
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
alc.)

0.5
α(exp.) vs. α(calc.)
1
0.01581746 0.22 0.3453 0.9
0.03163491 0.39 0.46924 0.8
0.04745237 0.53 0.556561 0.7
0.6

α(calc.)
0.06326982 0.61 0.624828 0.5
0.07908728 0.68 0.680847 0.4
0.09490474 0.72 0.728107 0.3
0.2
0.11072219 0.78 0.768679 0.1
0.12653965 0.84 0.803908 0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
0.1423571 0.84 0.834728
α(exp.)
0.15817456 0.84 0.861812

α(exp) vs. α(cal.) recta a 45°

α(exp) α(cal.) α(exp.) vs. α(calc.)


0 0 1
0.22 0.2140159 0.9
0.8
0.39 0.3785206 0.7
0.53 0.5049682 0.6
α(calc.)

0.61 0.6021629 0.5


0.4
0.68 0.6768723 0.3
0.72 0.7342982 0.2
0.1
0.78 0.7784389 0
0.84 0.812368 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
0.84 0.8384478 α(exp.)
0.84 0.8584942
α(exp) vs. α(cal.) recta a 45°
. α(calc.)

0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9


exp.)

recta a 45°

. α(calc.)
. α(calc.)

4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9


exp.)

) recta a 45°

. α(calc.)

4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9


exp.)

) recta a 45°

You might also like