C4: Operations Management: Course Manual
C4: Operations Management: Course Manual
All rights reserved. No part of this course may be reproduced in any form by any means
without prior permission in writing from:
Commonwealth of Learning
1055 West Hastings Street
Suite 1200
Vancouver, BC V6E 2E9
CANADA
Email: [email protected]
Maurice Fletcher
University College of the Caribbean, Jamaica
Araba Intsiful
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology,
Ghana
S. A. D. Senanayake
Open University of Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka
COL would also like to thank the many other people who have contributed to the writing of
this course.
Contents
Contents
Module 4 1
Unit 9
Inventory planning and management ................................................................................ 3
Activity 4.1 ........................................................................................................................ 9
Activity 4.2 ...................................................................................................................... 19
Activity 4.3 ...................................................................................................................... 25
Unit summary 25
References 26
Readings for further study 26
Unit 10 27
Supply chain management ............................................................................................... 27
Activity 4.4 ...................................................................................................................... 38
Unit summary 38
References 39
Readings for further study 39
Unit 11 40
Project management ........................................................................................................ 40
Activity 4.5 ...................................................................................................................... 52
Unit summary 52
References 53
Readings for further study 53
Unit 12 54
Performance measurement .............................................................................................. 54
Activity 4.6 ...................................................................................................................... 66
Unit summary 66
References 67
Readings for further study 67
Activity feedback............................................................................................................. 69
C4: Operations Management
Module 4
Introduction
This module is about inventory, supply chain management, projects
and performance measurement.
At first sight this may appear a real mix of topics, however, the
whole course has been building towards this end. We have
developed processes and improved processes so we can deliver
products and services to satisfy customer requirements.
Inventory is the output of a production system and is used as inputs
to other production systems and during service delivery. The
supply chain describes the flow of raw material inventories from
suppliers through plants that transform them into useful products
and finally to distribution centres that deliver those products to end
customers.
So that takes care of inventory and supply chain management.
In a modern business, most process improvement initiatives are
undertaken as a project. This is particularly true for six sigma
quality projects. A project is a once-only activity and can change
the way a business operates and sometimes this change is
irreversible. That makes project success so important.
Finally, performance measurement provides the means for
determining progress and measuring success (or failure). Business
organisations regularly report on their financial achievements and
not-for-profit organisations have to achieve results within limited
expense budgets that have to be contained.
Traditional performance measurement that measures profit, or
return on investment, is relatively easily understood. The approach
today requires a proliferation of measurements and these include
dimensions that are quantitative as well as qualitative.
1
Module 4
2
C4: Operations Management
Unit 9
3
Unit 9
4
C4: Operations Management
5
Unit 9
6
C4: Operations Management
stock.
Set-up costs Set-up costs are the fixed costs associated with
production that include paperwork, machine
set-up, calibration, downtime and start-up
scrap that can be associated with the
changeover from one product to the next.
7
Unit 9
8
C4: Operations Management
All of these are inventory and all have the same inventory problems
to solve. What is the order quantity? When should the order be
placed?
Inventory management is the process of planning and controlling
physical inventory.
Activity 4.1
Now that we have introduced the subject, reflect on what
inventory does for an organisation. Think of an organisation with
which you are familiar and try answering these questions:
Activity 1. How much inventory should the organisation have?
2. When should you pay for it?
3. How much should you pay for it?
4. What happens if you have too much inventory?
5. What happens if you have too little inventory?
6. Where is inventory stored?
7. How much storage space is required?
8. How is inventory transported?
9. How much inventory is transported at one time?
10. How is inventory stored?
11. What happens if the inventory is a hazardous substance (or
dangerous to handle)?
12. How do you keep track of what inventory you have?
13. What is the value of the inventory you have?
14. What can you do with the inventory you do have?
15. We could consider many more questions at this stage but the
above give some idea of where we are heading.
9
Unit 9
10
C4: Operations Management
11
Unit 9
12
C4: Operations Management
Inventory models
The demand for inventory can be either independent or dependent.
Independent items supply the demand that comes from outside the
organisation. These can be managed by fixed quantity, fixed
period, minimum-maximum, or budget allocation inventory control
systems. Dependent demand items supply requirements from inside
the organisation. They are components of other products so their
rate of use is dependent on the production schedule and the rate of
use of the parent items. Dependent demand items are managed by
material requirements planning and lean thinking approaches to
keep inventories as low as possible.
A reorder point is a predetermined inventory level where, if the
total stock on hand plus on order reaches this point or falls below it,
a replenishment action is initiated. The order point is usually
calculated as the demand during replenishment lead time plus
safety stock.
13
Unit 9
14
C4: Operations Management
15
Unit 9
16
C4: Operations Management
17
Unit 9
excess stocks, rough estimates and hoped that they had enough
materials.
Orlicky used a computer (albeit very slow by today’s standards) to
calculate the requirements of each component that made up the
finished product. Starting with a statement of the specific quantity
of each specific product for each specific required date, called the
master production schedule, he exploded the bills of material to
calculate the quantities of components. He considered the lead time
for each item and offset the release of the replenishment order to
compensate for the lead time. Progressively, this built up gross
requirements at the next level down the bill of material so he
subjected these to the same logic.
This development had profound implications for manufacturing
systems.
The driver to this method is the master production schedule, which
has to be realistic and achievable. At the finished goods level, it
reflects the quantities of finished products that must be available
for sale in each time period. If this is a true statement the
subsequent calculations may deliver meaningful results.
The bill of materials should reflect actual material requirements per
item. The bill of materials is like a recipe or a formula. In fact,
some industries, such as pharmaceuticals and food processing, refer
to their bills of materials as recipes and formulas. Some
compensation is introduced to allow for variation, scrap, wastage,
shrinkage, loss, pilferage and misplacement. The quantity for each
is the quantity of the component for one of the parent items. This
number has to be correct.
Lead times are usually entered as fixed numbers and these offset
the release of each replenishment order. So an item will be
reordered next week if it is required in four weeks and it takes three
weeks to be delivered. This allows raw material supply to be
calculated and delivered at the latest possible due date.
Inventory accuracy of quantities on hand and on order is required.
If the computer shows an item is in plentiful supply, the MRP
system will not suggest replenishment. If the storage bin is empty,
it remains empty until the item is required, at which time it is too
late to obtain replacement.
This capability reduces inventory, reduces idle time, reduces set-up
and tear-down costs, increases sales and provides better customer
service and response to market demands.
MRP systems are well developed and the logic is quite
straightforward. The theory of MRP is right, but the execution
leaves a lot to be desired. The variables are too great for many
organisations to manage.
18
C4: Operations Management
Activity 4.2
Now that we have introduced the subject of material requirements
planning, try answering this question:
What data is required to develop a very basic MRP?
Activity
Activity feedback can be found at the end of this module.
Constraint management
When a process is flowing, the inputs are processed as they arrive
and the outputs delivered to customers as they demand them. It
would be marvellous if this actually happened.
Bottleneck processes hold up production and are usually easy to
identify because a queue forms in front of the process because the
process has insufficient capacity to meet demand.
By definition, a bottleneck process is slower than other processes.
When non-bottleneck processes get behind, they have the ability to
19
Unit 9
catch up because they are not the slowest. However, the slowest
process can never catch up because other processes are faster.
Thus, the bottleneck becomes the constraint that limits system
performance and total output can never exceed the average output
from the constraint.
A non-bottleneck is a resource whose capacity is greater than the
demand placed upon it and it contains idle time. A capacity-
constrained resource is one whose utilisation is close to capacity
and could become a bottleneck if not scheduled carefully.
The theory of constraints emphasises the need to identify and
manage constraints or bottlenecks within the production system,
the organisation itself, or the network of supply and distribution
activities.
Common constraints involve machines and people. Each machine
is capable of producing a volume of output which is its capacity.
People are capable of delivering an amount of work, which is their
capacity. When these capacities are insufficient to meet demand
they become constraints or capacity-constrained resources.
Effective planning and management of capacity-constrained
resources uses realistic production goals that consider capacity
constraints. Production plans, master production schedules and all
other plans should focus on bottleneck activities since these limit
system outputs. Unrealistic demands on bottleneck resources create
unrealistic demands and expectations on the entire system.
Operations managers should adapt work flows to encourage
effective use of capacity-constrained resources.
Theory of constraints
Eliyahu Goldratt and Jeff Cox (1984) introduced the theory of
constraints in the book, The Goal: A Process of Ongoing
Improvement. The book is a novel as well as a powerful textbook.
It is about creating and accepting improvements, making
continuous progress and changing for the better.
Theory of constraints (TOC) is a philosophy of continuous
improvement based on the premise that constraints determine the
performance of any system.
The philosophy is based on three very interesting definitions:
throughput, inventory and operating expense.
Throughput is the rate at which the firm generates money
through sales.
Inventory items purchased for resale including finished
goods, work in process and raw materials. In the theory of
constraints, inventory is valued at purchase price and
20
C4: Operations Management
21
Unit 9
In the diagram above, the material is flowing from left to right and
passes through six process steps. Process step four is by far the
longest and takes twice as long as step three. Assuming all process
steps keep working, it will not take long for a queue to form in
front of process step four. Process step four is the bottleneck. It
does not matter how fast or how long the other process steps
operate because the output of the total process is determined by the
performance at process step four.
22
C4: Operations Management
23
Unit 9
24
C4: Operations Management
Activity 4.3
Work through the following questions. You may need to go back
and reread the unit to help you.
1. Explain why the economic order quantity model is not
Activity appropriate for modern business.
2. Explain the difference between MRP and MRP II.
3. Explain the sales and operations planning process.
4. Explain why sales and operations planning is performed at the
aggregate level.
5. Explain the theory of constraints.
6. Explain how the drum-buffer-rope works.
7. Explain the difference between a capacity-constrained resource
and a bottleneck.
8. Explain why an organisation might carry safety stock.
Unit summary
In this unit you learned about the reason for having inventory and
why the economic order quantity is not appropriate for modern
business. We described a fixed-order quantity model and a periodic
Summary review model and how lead times and safety stock affect inventory
management.
The process for sales and operations planning, material
requirements planning and manufacturing resource planning were
discussed.
Under the general topic of theory of constraints, we explained a
bottleneck process, discussed the logical thinking process and
discussed the drum-buffer-rope method for production scheduling.
We described the operations scheduling process and differentiated
between backward and forward scheduling.
25
References
References
Franklin, B. (1758, June). The complete poor Richard’s almanacks.
Gardiner, D. (2010). Operations management for business
excellence (2nd ed.). Auckland, New Zealand: Pearson
Education.
Goldratt, E. M. & Cox, J. (1984). The goal: A process of ongoing
improvement. Croton-on-Hudson, NY: North River Press.
Orlicky, J. (1975). Material requirements planning: The new way of
life in production and inventory management. New York,
NY: McGraw-Hill.
26
C4: Operations Management
Unit 10
27
Unit 10
28
C4: Operations Management
29
Unit 10
30
C4: Operations Management
31
Unit 10
32
C4: Operations Management
33
Unit 10
have every firm base their demand forecast on just those parts of
the supply chain that they can see, it would benefit all participants
if the demand data occurring downstream is made available
upstream. In this way both firms use the same demand data.
Order batching can be minimised by encouraging firms to order
regular smaller batches. In a traditional supplier–customer
relationship, pricing may depend upon purchase order volumes. If
the quantity discount was available over an extended period, the
size of each order would not matter.
Forward buying and diversions can be avoided with stable prices.
Two terms now being used are everyday low prices (EDLP) and
everyday low costs (EDLC).
Eliminate the gaming activities that exist at times of shortage.
Firms should allocate orders on the basis of past orders. Regular
customers can continue to receive regular deliveries.
34
C4: Operations Management
35
Unit 10
36
C4: Operations Management
Supplier selection
In a collaborative supply chain the choice of supplier assumes an
extremely important position. It is unfortunate that the majority of
small and medium firms still pick suppliers based on price. One of
the first questions asked in negotiation is “What is your price?”
With the modern approach to collaboration each supplier should be
evaluated on the following criteria:
Potential to develop a close long-term relationship.
Financial strength and capability.
Quality performance, including process capability and ability to
conform to agreed specification.
Research, technical ability and new product development
strategy.
Ability to deliver frequently, quickly and reliably.
Management structures and attitudes to collaboration.
Pricing structures and dependencies.
Trustworthiness and ability to have timely communications on
any problems.
37
Unit summary
Activity 4.4
Work through the following questions. You may need to go back
and reread the unit to help you.
1. Explain the bullwhip effect. In particular, explain how it
Activity happens and what can be done to minimise adverse effects.
2. Describe the Triple-A supply chain approach.
3. Explain vertical integration as a means to secure more linkages
in the supply chain.
4. Evaluate the criteria for selecting a supplier.
Unit summary
This unit started by defining supply chain management from a
strategic view. This led directly to the bullwhip effect or demand
amplification. The concept of collaborative supply chains was
Summary introduced and one method for approaching collaboration, the
Triple-A approach, was introduced. The unit concluded by
discussing the strategic role of inventory in supply chains and the
criteria for supplier selection.
38
C4: Operations Management
References
Cox, A. (1999). Power, value and supply chain management.
Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 4 (4)
(pp. 167-175).
Gardiner, D. (2010). Operations Management for Business
Excellence (2nd ed.). North Shore, New Zealand: Pearson
Education.
Lee H. L. (2004, October). The Triple-A supply chain. Harvard
Business Review, 82 (10), October 2004 (pp 102–112).
Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, V. & Whang, S. (1997, Spring). The
bullwhip effect in supply chains. Sloan Management
Review, 38 (3) (pp. 93-102).
Narayanan, V. G. &. Raman, A. (2004, November). Aligning
incentives in supply chains. Harvard Business Review, 82
(11) (pp. 94-102).
39
Unit 11
Unit 11
Project management
Introduction
This unit will consider the challenges facing operations managers
in order to help them understand the difficulties and complexities
of managing projects.
This unit will treat projects as a derivative of a fixed-position
process structure and provide an operations manager with some
fundamental tools for communicating with project management.
Many process improvement tools discussed in this course will
require a project management approach for implementation. Thus
the operations manager needs an appreciation and understanding of
the requirements and issues faced by a project manager.
This unit begins by investigating the strategic nature of projects,
the project life cycle and project organisation structures. This is
followed by a description of the project manager. Project
management structures are developed. Then the concepts of the
critical chain, as proposed by Goldratt, are presented. Finally, we
examine why projects fail and what makes projects successful.
40
C4: Operations Management
Project life cycle Project life cycle is the stages on the path from
start to completion of a project.
41
Unit 11
Managing projects
The Project Management Institute (2008) defines a project as a
temporary endeavour undertaken to create a unique product or
result. There are two key words in that definition: temporary and
unique. Temporary means the project has a definite beginning and
ending. Unique means the product or service is different in some
way from all other products and services.
Construction industries, consulting services, infrastructure
development and major events management are all examples of
projects.
New product and service development is usually undertaken by a
project team. The people involved with new product and service
development would more than likely be developing on a
continuous basis, but for the duration of one particular product, it is
deemed to be one project.
Finding, or building, a new facility and equipping it with process
technology would typically be managed as a project. Software
development and a major upgrade in computing and information
technology software and hardware would typically be managed as a
project.
A project is developed using progressive elaboration, or an iterative
approach. It needs a purpose, is temporary in nature, requires
resources, needs a primary sponsor and has uncertainty (which
implies risk).
42
C4: Operations Management
43
Unit 11
44
C4: Operations Management
Functional organisation
A functional organisation uses people on a part-time basis from
within the same organisation to manage the project, which is
clearly the responsibility of one department. An existing manager
from within the department acts as the project manager and project
team members are usually not dedicated to the project. The
functional manager controls the budget and allocation of resources.
The project manager is assigned part time and has little or no
authority.
The advantages of using a functional organisation structure are:
Team members are familiar with each other and individual
skill levels are known.
Each team member can work on more than one project.
Staff members can be assigned as needed and then returned
to their normal roles within the organisation.
The lines of authority and communication are clearly
understood and conflicts are minimised.
The disadvantages of using a functional organisational structure
are:
The project often lacks focus.
Motivation is often weak.
Bureaucratic procedures may slow process and decision-
making as there may be more levels of approval than
needed.
The needs and priorities of the department are often placed
before the needs of the customer.
Matrix organisation
A matrix organisation attempts to blend the properties of functional
and projectised project structures. The project manager decides
what tasks take place and when, but functional managers control
how the tasks take place and who performs each task.
The matrix organisation can be weak, balanced or strong, with the
main differences being the role the project manager assumes. With
the weak matrix structure, the project manager is assigned part time
and has little or no authority while the functional manager controls
the budget and allocates resources. With the strong matrix, the
project manager is assigned full time, has a moderate to high level
of authority and manages the budget. The balanced matrix
organisation structure is somewhere in between.
The advantages of using a matrix organisational structure are:
Communication is enhanced.
It provides an efficient use of resources.
45
Unit 11
46
C4: Operations Management
47
Unit 11
48
C4: Operations Management
Critical chain
The concept of the critical chain was introduced by Eliyahu
Goldratt (1997) in his book, Critical Chain, because of inherent
problems with project management. He identified typical problems
and behaviours, such as:
Activity durations are inflated to make sure they can be
completed on schedule.
Project team members procrastinate because they know
activity durations have built-in slack time.
Safety time is wasted at the beginning of each activity
instead of completing the activity and preparing for the next
one.
49
Unit 11
50
C4: Operations Management
51
Unit summary
Activity 4.5
Work through the following questions. You may need to go back
and reread the unit to help you.
1. What is a project?
Activity 2. What makes a project different from other business activities?
3. What is project “creep” and what should be done to prevent it?
4. Explain the critical chain method.
5. What makes a project successful?
6. As a project manager, how would you ensure that your project
is successful?
Unit summary
This unit began by investigating the strategic nature of projects, the
project life cycle and organisation structures. This was followed by
a description of the project manager and the role expected of a
Summary project manager. Project management structures were developed.
Then the concept of the critical chain was presented. Finally, we
examined why projects fail and what makes projects successful.
52
C4: Operations Management
References
Gardiner, D. (2010). Operations management for business
excellence (2nd ed.). Auckland, New Zealand: Pearson
Education.
Goldratt, E. M. (1997). Critical chain. Great Barrington, MA:
North River Press.
Project Management Institute. (2008). A guide to the project
management body of knowledge (4th ed.). Newton Square,
PA: Project Management Institute.
53
Unit 12
Unit 12
Performance measurement
Introduction
In public sector service organisations, stakeholders and the press
demand information to enable them to construct rankings.
Hospitals, schools, local councils and charities are among the
organisations now scrutinised on an annual basis against a set of
performance measures. With this comes the problem of
misunderstanding or misinterpretation.
With traditional accounting measures, profit, or return on
investment, is relatively easily understood. It represents one
approach to performance measurement that is based on a few
quantifiable financial measurements. The approach today requires a
proliferation of measurements and these measurements include
dimensions that are quantitative as well as qualitative.
This unit begins by investigating the need to have a balanced view
on performance measurement. The Hoshin process is described for
setting the goals and using measurement systems. The balanced
scorecard approach to performance measurement is presented. The
closed-loop management system involving developing the strategy,
translating the strategy, planning the operations, monitoring and
learning, and testing and adapting the strategy is presented.
The driving forces of performance and benchmarking are
discussed.
54
C4: Operations Management
55
Unit 12
56
C4: Operations Management
Capacity management
Capacity management can be measured at the aggregate level to
improve performance.
Capacity performance measurement is usually linked with demand
performance measurement since both are calculated at the
aggregate level.
Process design
The real measures on process design relate to how well the process
can cope with the variability of customer demand. This translates
into shorter lead times and increased flexibility.
Process improvement
Process thinking is not about overhead allocation and cost
accounting, not about confusion and delay; it is a discipline that
designs outstanding performance rather than relying on luck.
Traditional company measurement systems look at history and tell
(approximately) what has happened. The missing link is telling you
what to do to make things better. That is where process thinking
develops a structure to improve performance across the whole
organisation.
Lean thinking
Often the metrics for lean thinking are aimed at technical issues or
process issues that are of little or no value to the customer. The real
metric for lean thinking should be a measure of the value being
added and that value is determined by the customer. Is the customer
willing to pay? Is the customer willing to pay a premium?
The next metric should be related to the waste inherent in the
process. Few customers are happy paying for waste and lean
thinking is all about eliminating waste.
Product design
The performance wants and excitement characteristics of new
products and services provide an excellent opportunity for an
organisation to gain competitive advantage. Knowledge about each
market segment and the changing customer requirements helps to
hit customer targets. Quality function deployment is epistemic and
allows invisible customer requirements to be visible.
Quality
Excellence is creating sustainable customer value and achieving
results that delight all the organisation's stakeholders. It requires
visionary and inspirational leadership, coupled with constancy of
purpose. The organisation is managed by processes and facts and
57
Unit 12
Hoshin planning
Any organisation wanting to exceed their customers’ expectations
and to stay competitive needs a long-range strategic plan that is
forward-looking, visionary and achievable. The best way to obtain
the desired outcome is to ensure all employees fully understand the
long-range goals and follow a co-ordinated plan to make that vision
a reality.
58
C4: Operations Management
59
Unit 12
Balanced scorecard
Balanced scorecard is a balanced set of performance measures
designed to reflect strategy and uniquely communicate a vision to
the organisation. Usually includes a customer perspective, financial
perspective, internal business processes, and innovation and
learning.
The balanced scorecard was developed by Kaplan and Norton in
1992. It was introduced when most business performance
measurements were finance-based and aimed only at controlling
the business from a financial perspective.
Traditional performance measurement was compared to a set of
predetermined actions that were expected to be followed. This may
be, for example, to achieve a given sales target or keep within a
given cost budget. It was assumed the organisation was successful
when these targets were achieved. By relying on traditional
financial measures, management does not receive the necessary
feedback to stimulate continuous improvement and innovation.
The balanced scorecard approach aims at cross-functional
integration, customer-supplier partnerships, global scale,
continuous achievement, and team rather than individual
accountability. This provides a balanced view of both financial and
operational performance measures.
60
C4: Operations Management
61
Unit 12
see external quality. They value the product on their own hands and
measure aspects such as delivery in full on time and in
specification (DIFOTIS).
Delivery measurements often measure the time and date products
leave the supplier’s premises and the actual delivery performance is
up to the customer to negotiate. Customers do not see it this way.
They want products delivered to their premises when and how they
want them.
Flexibility is often demonstrated by organisations after they have
stated the rules of engagement. Flexibility is often at the supplier’s
convenience, not when it suits the customer. Delivery is often made
at a supplier-determined schedule. Passenger and freight transport
is arranged at the transport operator’s advertised schedule.
Internal perspective
The customer perspective looks at the organisation from the outside
while the internal perspective looks at the organisation from the
inside and asks, “at what aspects of business should we excel?”.
Process design and process improvement all occur internally and
the results of these initiatives affect customers.
Processes measured as part of the balanced scorecard have the most
impact on customer satisfaction. Clearly these affect lead time,
throughput time, employee skills and attitudes, flexibility,
availability, responsiveness and information systems.
Organisations decide on competitive capability as a part of strategy
and develop core competence to deliver that capability. Processes
are designed and improved to enhance core competence from a
customer perspective. These are all internal processes and can be
measured from an internal perspective.
Information and communication technology play an important part
in the internal perspective. When problems are identified by the
balanced scorecard, analysis of the relevant data is often a
responsibility of information systems. As an example, if delivery
performance is highlighted as a customer issue, the delivery data
can be analysed to determine the delivery status and possibly
identify root cause.
Innovation and learning perspective
Innovation and learning perspective asks, “can we continue to
improve and create value?”. Competitive activities are constantly
challenging every organisation’s position. All other organisations
challenge the organisation at the top of the league. Even
organisations positioned somewhere in the middle have to face
constant challenges for their position. Customer expectations are
constantly changing and these force organisations to be totally
aware of the range and scope of those changes.
62
C4: Operations Management
63
Unit 12
should try using strategy maps. They maintained that the balanced
scorecard could be implemented better by using strategy maps
(Kaplan & Norton, 2000).
While the balanced scorecard is a tool for the implementation of
strategy, it does not, in itself, ensure best strategy is implemented.
Successfully implementing a money-losing or disastrous strategy
will result in successfully losing money or disaster. The tool is not
to blame.
64
C4: Operations Management
Benchmarking
Benchmarking is the process of measuring a company’s products,
services, costs and practices and comparing that measurement with
the best in the industry, the best-of-class or world-class. The aim is
to use that measurement as a means to improve performance.
Best practice is the measurement or performance standard by which
similar items are evaluated. Approaches that produce exceptional
results are usually innovative in terms of the use of technology or
human resources, and are recognised by customers or industry
experts.
A benchmark is a standard or point of reference by which
something can be measured or judged and competitive
benchmarking involves analysing the performance and practices of
best-of-class companies. The best practice is demonstrated by the
best-of-class and their performance becomes a benchmark to which
a firm can compare its own performance. Once a comparison has
been made, the firm can improve its processes.
65
Unit summary
Activity 4.6
Work through the following questions. You may need to go back
and reread the unit to help you.
1. Describe the balanced scorecard approach.
Activity 2. Evaluate Hoshin planning as a strategic planning system.
3. Evaluate Hoshin planning as a performance measuring system.
4. What are some financial measurements for an organisation?
5. What are some operational measurements for an organisation?
6. How can innovation and learning be measured?
7. What is an appropriate measurement for internal processes?
8. What performance measurements are suitable for a call centre?
9. How does benchmarking benefit an organisation?
Unit summary
In this unit you learned descriptive measurements for business
excellence. You learned about the Hoshin process for setting the
goals and using measurement systems. The balanced scorecard
Summary approach to performance measurement was introduced and
discussed. The closed-loop management system linking strategy
and operations was described and finally, benchmarking was
discussed.
66
C4: Operations Management
References
Gardiner, D. (2010). Operations management for business
excellence (2nd ed.). Auckland, New Zealand: Pearson
Education.
Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (1992, January–February). The
balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance.
Harvard Business Review, 72.
Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (2000, September–October). Having
trouble with your strategy? Then map it. Harvard Business
Review, 167–176.
Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (2004). Strategy maps: Converting
intangible assets into tangible outcomes. Boston, MA:
Harvard Business School Press.
Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (2008, January–February). Mastering
the management system. Harvard Business Review, 68.
67
Readings for further study
68
C4: Operations Management
Activity feedback
Activity 4.1
Inventory costs money so when an organisation obtains more
inventory it costs it more money. If it obtains a lot more inventory
it costs it a lot more money. That money is now tied up with the
inventory investment and cannot be used for any other purpose.
While inventory is being held it may appreciate in value but, more
than likely, it will depreciate in value. Appreciation arises in times
of rising prices and currency fluctuations. Depreciation is more
common as customers are not prepared to pay full price for
something that is not brand new or fresh.
Inventory hides problems and compensates for poor delivery
performance, high levels of scrap and rework, poorly maintained
equipment, incorrect quantities used and supplied, and poor buying
decisions. Inventory, in this sense, encourages ineffective
behaviour and poor performance.
Inventory requires storage places. Warehouses, storage sheds, retail
shelves, containers and transport systems are built to hold and
manage inventory. This is a real concern when the items held are
large, bulky and carry little value. Foam used in packaging and
upholstery is an example of a product made almost entirely of air
that is relatively cheap to make but expensive to store.
Inventory slows the speed of production as batches of product
move through production systems. When more inventories are
used, transport systems are bigger, slower, clumsier and less able to
cope with changing customer demands.
Inventory encourages obsolescence or may even become obsolete.
The use-by date on supermarket items encourages households to
buy in smaller quantities and hold smaller quantities in their homes
to prevent the goods expiring.
Inventory requires special handling conditions and may be
hazardous to store. Dangerous chemicals and inflammable liquids
need specially constructed storage areas and staff need specialist
training when handling and using these items.
Inventory is counted, administered, managed and may also be
insured against loss. These actions take up time and money for the
people involved.
69
Activity feedback
Activity 4.2
Material requirements planning (MRP) is a set of techniques that
uses the master production schedule, bills of material and inventory
data to calculate the requirements of component materials.
MRP uses the master production schedule which is the list of
products, quantities and dates for the next few months. It starts with
each specific item and quantity listed, and calculates the quantities
of all components and materials required to make those items and
the date those items must be available for use.
To calculate the quantities of all components and materials
required, it uses the bill of materials indicating the quantities of
components to be used to make each product. Bills of materials are
also called formulas, recipes, formulations or ingredient lists.
MRP explodes the bill of material, adjusts for inventory quantities
on hand or already on order, and calculates net requirements that
are offset by the lead time.
The inventory data needed for a basic MRP system includes lead
time required to obtain or manufacture all products and materials,
the quantity to order or the batch size and the quantity on-hand or
the current inventory balance.
The master production schedule entries are translated into gross
requirements for all materials by time period.
The gross requirement is the total requirement of an item generated
from the master production schedule and subsequent levels in the
bill of material. The gross requirement is balanced with inventory
on hand, scheduled receipts and safety stock to calculate net
requirements.
The net requirement is the result of applying a gross requirement
against inventory on hand, allocations, scheduled receipts and
safety stock. The net requirement is then lot-sized and offset for
lead time and becomes a planned order.
MRP calculates the net requirements by subtracting current stocks
and current on order quantities from the overall gross requirement.
The explosion process is controlled by the bills of material. If net
requirements are greater than zero, order receipts must be planned.
The order release is offset from the required order receipt date by
the lead time.
MRP outputs include planned orders, order release notices, changes
in open orders due to rescheduling, and inventory status data. The
resulting planned order releases which become the detailed
production schedules are examined for availability of resources for
each time period. If the capacity is inadequate to meet the schedule,
the MPS is modified and the MRP programme run again. The
70
C4: Operations Management
Activities 4.3–4.6
All answers are in the learning material.
71