Saimaa University of Applied Sciences

Technology, Lappeenranta
Double Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering

Arina Belovolova

Design of dynamically loaded foundations for

pumps and compressors

Bachelor’s Thesis 2019

Abstract
Arina Belovolova
Design of dynamically loaded foundations for pumps and compressors
38 pages, 1 appendix
Saimaa University of Applied Sciences
Technology, Lappeenranta
Double Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering
Bachelor´s Thesis 2019
Instructors: Kostiantyn Khrameshkin, Lead Design Engineer, Neste Engineering
Solutions, Petri Himmi, Lecturer, Saimaa University of Applied Sciences
The work was commissioned by Neste Engineering Solutions. The purpose of the
work was to study the design process of dynamically loaded foundations. The
process of calculating foundations for vibrating machines is long and complex, it
includes many factors that should be taken into account. That is why the task was
to create a manual and the Excel file for fast calculation.

Data for this study were collected by the mentor, it included compressor drawings
and dynamic parameters of the machine. The information for the design was
gathered from literature and articles taken from the Internet.

The final result of this thesis was an Excel file for calculating two different types
of vibrating machines: Rotary and Reciprocating. This file allows to check the
designed foundation for compliance with the main criteria required for the
dynamically loaded foundations.

Keywords: foundation, dynamic loads, resonance, amplitude, vibrations,

frequency, damping

2
 CONTENTS

SYMBOLS .......................................................................................................... 4
1. INTRODUCTION....................................................................................... 6
1.1 Types of machines ................................................................................ 6
1.2 Types of foundations ............................................................................. 7
2. CRITERIA FOR DESIGN ........................................................................ 7
2.1 Design Approach for machine foundation ............................................. 9
3. GENERAL THEORY ............................................................................... 10
4. DESIGN PARAMETERS......................................................................... 15
4.1 Dynamic soil properties ....................................................................... 15
4.2 Machine parameters ........................................................................... 16
5. THE PRELIMINARY DESIGN ................................................................. 17
6. ALGORITHM OF CALCULATION ........................................................... 18
6.1 Rotary machines ................................................................................. 18
6.2 Reciprocating machines ...................................................................... 23
7. ANALYSIS .............................................................................................. 27
8. MATERIAL RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................ 28
8.1 Concrete ............................................................................................. 28
8.2 Reinforcement ..................................................................................... 28
8.3 Grout ................................................................................................... 28
9. PILE FOUNDATIONS ............................................................................. 29
10. CONCLUSION ....................................................................................... 33
LIST OF REFERENCES ...................................................................................... 34
APPENDICES ...................................................................................................... 35

3
Symbols

A – cross-section as area of pile

B - Width of rectangular foundation block, m
Bz, Bx, Bψ, Bϴ - Mass ratio; vertical, horizontal, rocking, pitching modes
E- modulus of elasticity of pile
F- Excitation force, kN
fres – Resonant frequency, Hz
G – Shear modulus of soil, kN/m2
g – Acceleration of gravity= 9,81 m/sec2
h - Effective foundation embedment depth, m
I – moment of inertia of pile about axis to resist displacement
Iψ, Iϴ - Mass moment of inertia in the rocking and pitching directions, kN*m*sec2
J- torsion moment of inertia of pile
kz, kx, kψ, kϴ - Spring constant; vertical, horizontal, rocking, pitching modes,
kN/m
L – length of rectangular foundation block, m
Lp – length of pile, m
M – Dynamic magnification factor
m – Mass, kN*sec2/m
nψ, nϴ - Rocking and pitching mass ratio factors for geometric damping
PH – Force transmitted in the horizontal direction, kN
Pv – Force transmitted in the vertical direction, kN
PTψ – Transmitted rocking moment, kN*m
PTϴ – Transmitted pitching moment, kN*m
pdyn – Bearing pressure due to transmitted dynamic force, kN/m 2
r – Ratio of operating frequency to natural frequency
r0 – Equivalent radius for rectangular footing, m
Rhx – Horizontal distance from center to edge of footing in the x-direction, m
Rhy – Horizontal distance from center to edge of footing in the y-direction, m
Rv – Vertical distance from base to horizontal machine load, m
Sall – Allowable soil pressure, kN/m2
T1 – Transmissibility factor for primary operating frequency
T2 – Transmissibility factor for secondary operating frequency

4
Vp, Vs – Shear wave velocities in pile and soil respectively
W – Total weight of machine plus foundation, kN
X – Displacement response in the horizontal x-direction, mm
Xt – Total displacement response in the horizontal x-direction, mm
Z – Displacement response in the vertical z-direction, mm
Zt – Total displacement response in the vertical z-direction, mm
αz, αx, αψ, αϴ - Damping ratio embedment factor; vertical, horizontal, rocking,
pitching modes
μ – Poisson’s ratio of soil
𝜌, ϒs – density of soil, kN/m3
ξz, ξx, ξψ, ξϴ (or cz, cx, cψ, cϴ)– Geometric damping ratios; vertical, horizontal,
rocking, pitching modes
ω – Operating speed of machine, rpm

5
1 Introduction
While designing foundations for machines, there is usually a question about
taking into account dynamic loads, which directly affect the calculation and
design. It also raises the question of choosing the right constructive solution to
the foundation in which his work under the influence of a dynamic load will not
have undesirable phenomena associated with his vibrations. When designing a
foundation for machinery, the designation of its dimensions, the choice of
concrete and reinforcement require careful attention. The engineer must always
solve his problem in a complex. He acts not only as a calculator who, on the
basis of a dynamic calculation, should give a correct forecast of the expected
level of fluctuations of the foundation. He needs to ensure that oscillations are
permissible, do not exceed certain limits. The amplitude of vibration of a
machine at its operating frequency is the most important parameter to be
determined in designing a machine foundation, in addition to the natural
frequency of a machine foundation soil system. [3] Guidelines for the designing
of foundations will be presented.

1.1 Types of machines

When designing foundations for machinery and equipment, the primary issue is
the need to take into account the calculations of dynamic loads. All machines,
without exception, transmit vibrations of varying intensity to the bases, however,
when some machines operate, considerable inertia forces arise, while the
operation of other machines is characterized by a very small level of dynamic
effects. In this connection, dynamic calculations of bases and foundations will
have to be made for machines of rotary (high-speed machines like
turbogenerators or rotary compressors), reciprocating (the machines that
produce periodic unbalanced forces, such as steam engines), and impact
(these machines produce impact loads, for instance, forging hammers) effects.

6
1.2 Types of foundations

By design, the foundations for machines can be block, wall and box type. Block
foundations are made in the form of blocks and slabs. The box foundations
consist of rigid walls connecting the upper and lower plates. Wall foundations
are formed by columns embedded in the lower slab, with the upper parts of the
columns being joined by beams or slabs. From the point of view of the work of
structures, block and box foundations are the foundations of a rigid type, and
the wall foundations are of an elastic type. Examples of constructive solutions
for block, wall and box foundations are shown in Figure 1. [3]

Figure 1. Foundation types (a) block type foundation, (b) box or caisson type
foundation, (c) wall type foundation [3]

2 Criteria for design

The basic requirements that must be met in the foundations for dynamic
machines:
Static loads
1. It should be safe against shear failure
2. Basement settlement within normal limits

7
These requirements are like for usual foundation under static load.
Dynamic loads
1) There should be no resonance; that is, the natural frequency of the machine
foundation-soil system should not coincide with the operating frequency of the
machine. In fact, a zone of resonance is generally defined and the natural
frequency of the system must lie outside this zone. The foundation is high tuned
when its fundamental frequency is greater than the operating speed or low
tuned when its fundamental frequency is lower than the operating speed. This
concept of a high or low tuned foundation is illustrated in Figure 2.

Figure 2. Concept of high of low tuned foundations [3]

2) The amplitudes of motion at operating frequencies should not exceed the

limiting amplitudes, which are generally specified by machine manufacturers. If
the computed amplitude is within tolerable limits, but the computed natural
frequency is close to the operating frequency, it is important that this situation
be avoided.
3) The natural frequency of the foundation –soil system should not be whole
number multiple of the operating frequency of the machine to avoid resonance
with the higher harmonics.

8
4) The settlement should be within permissible limits.
5) The combined centre of gravity of machine and foundation should be, to the
extent possible, in the same vertical line as the centre of gravity of the base line.
6) All rotating and reciprocating parts of the machine should be so balanced that
the unbalanced forces and moments are minimised. (This is the responsibility of
the mechanical engineers).
7) The foundation should be so planned as to permit subsequent alteration of
natural frequency by changing the base area or mass of the foundation, if found
necessary subsequently. From the practical point of view, the following
additional requirements should also be
fulfilled:
1) The ground water table should be below the base plane by at least one-
fourth of the width of the foundation. Since ground-water is a good conductor of
waves, this limits the propagation of vibration.
2) Machine foundations should be separated from adjacent building
components by means of expansion joints.
3) Any pipes carrying hot fluids, if embedded in the foundation, must be properly
isolated.
4) The foundation should be protected from machine oil by means of suitable
chemical treatment, which is acid-resistant.
5) Machine foundations should be taken to a level lower than the level of
foundations of adjoining structures. [3]

2.1 Design Approach for Machine Foundation

The task for designing of foundations for machines with dynamic loads in
addition to the general data on the equipment should contain:
1) the technical characteristics of machines (name, type, number of rotations
per minute, power, total weight, etc.)
2) information about the magnitudes, places of application and directions of
action of static loads, as well as about amplitudes and frequencies, places of
application and direction of dynamic loads.
3) data on the maximum permissible deformations of the foundations and their
basement.
4) requirements for placement of machine on the foundations.

9
5) drawings of the dimensions of the foundation within the location of the
machine, fasteners, as well as auxiliary equipment, communications and hole
sizes.
6) drawings of all communications adjacent to the foundation.
7) data on the geological conditions of the construction site and soil properties.
8) information about the location of the designed foundation relative to the
nearest structures.
9) requirements for the protection of the foundation from groundwater, as well
as other external factors characteristic of the design environment.

3 General theory

The analysis of machine foundation is usually performed by idealizing it as a

simple system as explained here. Figure 5 shows a schematic sketch of a rigid
concrete block resting on the ground surface and supporting a machine. Let us
assume that the operation of the machine produces a vertical unbalanced force
which passes through the combined centre of gravity of the machine-foundation
system. Under this condition, the foundation will vibrate only in the vertical
direction about its mean position of static equilibrium. The vibration of the
foundation results in transmission of waves through the soil. These waves carry
energy with them. This loss of energy is termed „geometrical damping‟. The soil
below the footing experiences cyclic deformations and absorbs some energy
which is termed „material damping‟. The material damping is generally small
compared to the geometrical damping and may be neglected in most cases.
However, material damping may also become important in some cases of
machine foundation vibrations. The problem of a rigid block foundation resting
on the ground surface, (Figure 3a) may therefore be represented in a
reasonable manner by a spring-mass-dashpot system shown in Figure 3b. The
spring in this figure is the equivalent soil spring which represents the elastic
resistance of the soil below the base of the foundation. The dashpot represents
the energy loss or the damping effect. The mass in Figure 3b is the mass of the
foundation block and the machine. If damping is neglected, a spring-mass
system shown in Figure 3c may be used to represent the problem defined in
Figure 3a. Single degree of freedom models shown in Figure 3b and c may in
fact be used to represent the problem of machine foundation vibration in any

10
mode of vibration if appropriate values of equivalent soil spring and damping
constants are used. [3]

Figure 3. Vertical vibrations of a machine foundation (a) Actual case, (b)

Equivalent model with damping, (c) Model without damping [3]

All foundations in practice are placed at a certain depth below the ground
surface. As a result of this embedment, the soil resistance to vibration develops
not only below the base of the foundation but also along the embedded portion
of the sides of the foundation. Similarly the energy loss due to radiation
damping will occur not only below the foundation base but also along the sides
of the foundation. The type of models shown in Figure 3 b and c may be used to
calculate the response of embedded foundations if the equivalent soil spring
and damping values are suitably modified by taking into account the behavior of
the soil below the base and on the sides of the foundation.
A typical concrete block is regarded as rigid as compared to the soil over which
it rests. Therefore, it may be assumed that it undergoes only rigid-body
displacements and rotations. Under the action of unbalanced forces, the rigid
block may thus undergo displacements and oscillations as follow (Figure 4) [3]

11
The cyclic displacement of a foundation can have six possible modes:
1. Translation in the vertical direction
2. Translation in the longitudinal direction
3. Translation in the lateral direction
4. Rotation about the vertical axis (yawing)
5. Rotation about the longitudinal axis (rocking)
6. Rotation about the lateral axis (pitching)

Figure 4. Possible modes for cyclic displacement of foundation [10]

Vertical vibrations:
Figure 3 shows a foundation resting on a soil that can be approximated to be an
equivalent spring and dashpot. This foundation is being subjected to a
sinusoidally varying force P = P₀sin ωt. The differential equation of motion for
this system can be given by

Inertial damping spring exciting

force force force force

where ω = circular frequency of vibration (rpm).

can be solved to obtain the amplitude (i.e., maximum displacement) of vibration
Z of the foundation as

12
 𝑃𝑍
𝐴𝑍 =
2
𝜔2 𝜔 2
𝑘𝑧 √[1 − ( 2 )] + (2𝜉𝑧 𝜔 )
𝜔𝑛𝑧 𝑛𝑧

𝑘
Where 𝜔𝑛 = √𝑚 is the undamped natural frequency and ξ is the damping ratio.

Torsional vibrations
A block foundation undergoing torsional vibrations is shown in Figure 5. Non-
uniform shearing resistance is mobilized during such vibrations.

Figure 5. Torsional vibrations of a machine foundation (a) Actual case, (b)

Equivalent model [3]
The equation of motion is

Damped amplitude of rocking vibrations AΩ is given by

𝑀𝑍
𝐴𝛺 =
2
𝜔2 𝜔 2
𝑘𝛺 √[1 − ( 2 )] + (2𝜉𝛺 𝜔 )
𝜔𝑛𝛺 𝑛𝛺

𝑘
Where 𝜔𝑛 = √𝑚 is the undamped natural frequency and ξ is the damping ratio.

13
Rocking Vibrations:
A rigid block foundation undergoing rocking vibrations due to an exciting
moment Mysinωt is shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6. Rocking vibrations of a rigid block under excitation due to an applied

moment [3]
The differential equation of motion for this system can be given by

Damped amplitude of rocking vibrations Aϴ is given by

𝑘
Where 𝜔𝑛 = √𝑚 is the undamped natural frequency and ξ is the damping ratio

14
Horizontal translation:

Figure 7. Sliding vibrations of a machine foundation (a) Actual case, (b)

Equivalent model [3]
The equation of the analog for sliding is

The damped amplitude in sliding is obtained as:

𝑘
Where 𝜔𝑛 = √𝑚 is the undamped natural frequency and ξ is the damping ratio.

4 Design parameters

4.1 Dynamic soil properties

Soil dynamics deals with engineering properties and behavior of soil under
dynamic stress. For the dynamic analysis of machine foundations, soil
properties, such as Poisson’s ratio, dynamic shear modulus, soil density and
damping of soil, are generally required. Satisfactory design of a machine
foundation needs information on soil profile, depth of different layers, physical
properties of soil and ground water level. This information can be obtained by
usual sub-surface exploration techniques. In addition, one must determine
dynamic shear modulus, material damping, poisons ratio and mass density of
soil for dynamic analysis of the machine foundation. Dynamic shear modulus of

15
a soil is generally determined from laboratory or field tests. Material damping
can be determined from vibration tests on soil columns in the laboratory. The
values of dynamic shear modulus and damping may be estimated from
empirical estimations for preliminary design purposes. [4]
The soil characteristics needed in analysis of foundation are:

1. Shear modulus G, (kN/m2)

2. Poisson’s ratio μ

Typical values for Poisson’s ratio:

▪ Soft clay: 0.3-0.4
▪ Medium dens sand/gravel: 0.3-0.4
▪ Dense sand or gravel: 0.4-0.5
▪ Partially saturated clay: 0.35-0.45
▪ Saturated clay: 0.4-0.5
3. Damping of soil ξ

4.Soil density 𝜌 (kg/m3)

Typical values for soil mass density:

▪ Concrete or solid rock clay: 2400 kg/m3
▪ Clay: 1000-1100 kg/m3
▪ Packed sand or gravel: 11600- 1900kg/m3
5. Allowable soil pressure Sall, (kN/m2)

4.2 Machine parameters

The machine parameters needed in analysis of foundation are:
- Static weight of machine and accessories.

- Characteristics of dynamic loads imposed by the machine operation

and their point of application.

-Rotation speed of machine.

Generally, the weight of the machine, center of gravity, surface areas, and
operating speeds are readily available from the manufacturer of the machine.

16
5 The preliminary design

• For preliminary design of concrete block foundations, the length and width
shall be 300- 600 mm longer and wider, respectively, than the equipment (if
block mounted) or the skid (if skid mounted).
• Block foundations shall have a minimum of 50% of the block thickness
embedded in the soil, unless otherwise specified by the equipment user.
• Depth shall be a minimum as follows:

1.2-1.5 m for drivers less than 1840 kW;

1.8 m for drivers in the range of 1840-3680 kW

1.8-2.5 m for drivers greater than 3680 kW

• The width of the foundation shall be at least 1.5 times the vertical distance
from the base to the machine center line, see Figure 8, unless analysis
demonstrated that a lesser value will perform adequately.

• The ratio of the height of the machine crankshaft above the base to the width
of the foundation block (or the pile group in the plan, if applicable) shall not be
more than 0.65.
• The top of the finished foundation shall be minimum 100 mm above the
finished elevation of the floor slab or grade to prevent damage to the machinery
from runoff or wash-down water

Figure 8. [6]

17
• To minimize torsional effects, a vertical line drawn through the centroid of the
machine or resultant of several machines shall pass within a distance of 5% of
the plan dimensions of the base from the centroid of the contact area (or pile
group), see Figure 9. [6]

Figure 9. [6]

6 Algorithm of calculations

6.1 Rotary machines

The dynamic forces acting at the axis of the shaft of rotary machine will excite
the structure in three different modes: vertical, horizontal and rocking.
As an example of calculations would be the rectangular foundation for
Compressor TYPE 4HF/3 (Figure 10). It is a rotary type machine. All
calculations are presented in Excel file.

18
Figure 10. Acting axis for Compressor TYPE 4HF/3

Design data:

Static weight of machinery: 196,13 kN (20 tons)

Rotation speed of machinery: 327rpm

Vibrating forces from machine parameters: Vertical Fz0=2,793 kN, Horizontal

Fx0=62,488 kN
Density of concrete: 24,516 kN/m3 (2500 kg/m3)

Soil density 𝜌: 18 kN/m3

Shear Modulus G: 21000 kN/m2

Poisson’s ratio 𝜇: 0,45

Soil damping: 0,05

Calculations:

Weight of foundation W f,(kN)

Wf = Vf*density of concrete (kN/m3)

W = weight of machine+ weight of footing

1. Mass m, (kN∙c2/m)

For vertical and horizontal translation:

𝑊
𝑚= , where g=9,81 m/c2
𝑔

19
Mass moment of Inertia for footing and machine

Rocking: 𝐼𝜓 According to Appendix 1 (footing)

Iψ= m(machine)*ki2 (machine)

ki – distance from center of mass to base of footing

1) Equivalent radius r0, (m)

Table 1. Determination of equivalent radius
Mode of vibration Equivalent radius
𝐵𝐿
Vertical 𝑟0 = √
𝜋

𝐵𝐿
Horizontal 𝑟0 = √
𝜋

Rocking/Pitching 4 𝐵𝐿3
𝑟𝛳,𝜓 = √
3𝜋
4 𝐵𝐿(𝐵2 + 𝐿2 )
Twisting 𝑟𝛺 = √
6𝜋

2) Mass ratio Bz , Bx , Bϴ, Bψ

Table 2. Determination of mass ratio

Mode of vibration Mass ratio
(1 − μ) 𝑊
Vertical 𝐵𝑧 =
4 𝜌𝑟03
7 − 8μ 𝑊
Horizontal 𝐵𝑥 =
32(1 − μ) 𝜌𝑟03
3(1 − μ) 𝐼𝛳
Rocking/Pitching 𝐵𝛳,𝜓 = 5
8 𝜌𝑟𝛳,𝜓
𝐼𝛺
Twisting 𝐵𝛺 = 5
𝜌𝑟0

20
Spring constant calculation:

3) Spring constant coeffitient αz , αx , αϴ ,αψ from Figure 7 depending on

L/B

Figure 11. Spring constant coeffitient determination [1]

4) Spring constant kz , kx , kϴ , kψ

Table 3. Determination of spring constant

Mode of vibration Spring constant
𝐺
Vertical 𝑘𝑧 =
1−μ 𝑧
𝛼 √𝐵𝐿

Horizontal 𝑘𝑥 = 2(1 + μ)G𝛼𝑥 √𝐵𝐿

𝐺
𝑘𝛳,𝜓 = 𝛼 𝐵𝐿2
Rocking/Pitching 1 − μ 𝛳,𝜓

Twisting -

Damping calculation:
5) Damping ξ z , ξ x , ξ ϴ , ξ ψ
Table 4. Determination of damping
Mode of vibration Damping
0,425
Vertical ξ𝑧 =
√𝐵𝑧
0,288
Horizontal ξ𝑥 =
√𝐵𝑥
0,15
Rocking/Pitching ξ𝛳,𝜓 =
(1 + 𝐵𝛳,𝜓 )√𝐵𝛳,𝜓

21
 0,5
Twisting ξ𝛺 =
1 + 2𝐵𝛺

6) Total damping
ξ ψ + ξ(from soil data)
7) Natural frequency f0, (Hz)

1 𝑘
𝑓0 = √
2𝜋 𝑚

Where k- Spring constant,(Kn/m) m- mass, (kN∙c2/m)

8) Resonance Frequency fres, (Hz)

For vertical translation check:

2 ξ 2>1 means that resonance not possible

2 ξ 2 <1 a resonance occurs, increase trial dimensions of foundation or choose a

rotation speed of machine so that there will be no resonance

For rocking and horizontal:

𝑓0
𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑠 =
√1 − 2ξ2

9) Vibrating forces from machine parameters:

Vertical Fz0=2,793 kN
Horizontal Fx0=62,488 kN
Rocking Fψ0= Fx0*Rv
Rv- Vertical distance from base to horizontal machine load, m
10) Magnification factor
1
M= ;
√(1−r2 )+(2ξr)2

ω k
Where r = ω ; ωn = √m
n
k- Spring constant,(Kn/m); m- mass, (kN∙c2/m); ωn -undamped natural circular
frequency.

22
11) Vibration Amplitude, (m or mm, rad)

∑𝑀𝑧 𝐹𝑧𝑜
𝒁=
𝑘𝑧

∑𝑀𝑥 𝐹𝑥𝑜
𝑿=
𝑘𝑥

∑𝑀𝜓 𝐹𝜓𝑜
𝝍=
𝑘𝜓
12) Component of rocking oscillation

At edge of footing= ψ*Rh

At center of bearing= ψ*Rv
Rh- Horizontal distance from center to edge of footing in the x-direction, m
Rv- Vertical distance from base to horizontal machine load, m
13) Resultant vibration amplitude
Zt = Z+ (At edge of footing= ψ*Rh)
Xt = X+ (At center of bearing= ψ*Rv)
14) Transmissibility Factor

√1 + (2ξ𝑟)2
𝑻𝑧,𝑥,𝜓 =
√(1 − 𝑟 2 )2 + (2ξ𝑟)2

15) Transmitted force

𝑃𝑉 = ∑𝑇𝐹𝑧𝑜 , 𝑘𝑁
𝑃𝐻 = ∑𝑇𝐹𝑥𝑜 , 𝑘𝑁
𝑃𝑇 = ∑𝑇𝐹𝜓0 , 𝑘𝑁 ∗ 𝑚
Check for:
1) Static conditions
✓ Static beating capacity. Proportion of footing area for 50% of Sall
Pstat<0,5*Sall
Where Pstat= W(footing+machine)/(L*B)
✓ Static settlement must be uniform; C.G. of footing and machine should
be within 5% of each linear dimension.
✓ Bearing capacity: static plus dynamic loads. The Magnification factor
should preferably be less than 1,5. The sum of static and dynamic loads should

23
be within of the footing C.G. For 75% of the Sall given for the static load
𝑃
𝑉 𝑃𝑇 ∗0,15
condition= 𝑃𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡 + 𝐿∗𝐵 ± <0,75*Sall
𝐿∗𝐵2

✓ Wfooting/Wmachine should be ≥ 3
𝑃𝑉 𝑃𝑇 ∗0,15
✓ 𝑃𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡 − 𝐿∗𝐵 − > 0, means that there should be no uplift.
𝐿∗𝐵2

2) Limiting dynamic conditions

✓ Resonance. The acting frequencies of the machine should have at least
difference of ±20% with the resonance frequency. 0,8𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑠 ≥ 𝑓 ≥ 1,2𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑠 [1]

6.2 Reciprocating machines

Forces generated by the reciprocating compressor will result in vertical, lateral,

rocking and pitching oscillation of the footing, while the forces generated by the
motor only will tend to oscillate the footing in the vertical, longitudinal, torsional
and pitching modes. However, the magnitude of the forces generated by the
motor are small and, consequently, the resulting vibration response is
negligible. Therefore, a dynamic analysis is only performed for the compressor
forces. [1]
In this paragraph only differences between calculation algoritm of Reciprocating
and Rotory machines will be described. All other calculations are the same as
described above.

Spring constant calculation

1) Embedment coefficients for spring constants ηZ, ηX , ηϴ, ηψ

Table 5. Determination of embedment coefficients for spring constants

Mode of vibration Embedment coefficients
Vertical 𝜂𝑧 =1+0,6(1-μ)(h/r0)
Horizontal 𝜂𝑥 =1+0,55(2-μ)(h/r0)
Rocking/Pitching 𝜂𝛳,𝜓 =1+1,2(1-μ)(h/rϴ,ψ)+0,2(2-μ)(h/rϴ,ψ2)
Twisting -

24
2) Spring constant kz , kx , kϴ , kψ

Table 6. Determination of spring constant

Mode of vibration Spring constant
𝐺
Vertical 𝑘𝑧 = 𝛼 √𝐵𝐿𝜂𝑧
1−μ 𝑧
Horizontal 𝑘𝑥 = 2(1 + μ)G𝛼𝑥 √𝐵𝐿𝜂𝑥
𝐺
𝑘𝛳 = 𝛼 𝐵𝐿2 𝜂𝛳,𝜓
Rocking/Pitching 1 − μ 𝛳,𝜓

Twisting -

Damping calculation
3) Damping ratio embedment factor αz , αx , αϴ

Table 7. Determination of embedment factor

Mode of vibration Damping ratio embedment factor
h
1 + 1,9(1 − μ)( )
Vertical 𝑟0
𝛼𝑧 =
√𝜂𝑧
h
1 + 1,9(2 − μ)( )
Horizontal 𝑟0
𝛼𝑥 =
√𝜂𝑥
𝛼𝛳,𝜓
h h
Rocking/Pitching 1 + 0,7(1 − μ) ( ) + 0,6(2 − μ)( )3
𝑟0 𝑟0
=
√𝜂𝛳,𝜓

4) Effective damping coefficients nψ,ϴ

Depending on Mass ratio B

Figure 12. [1]

5) Damping ξ z , ξ x , ξ ϴ , ξ ψ
Table 8. Determination of damping
Mode of vibration Damping
0,425
Vertical ξ𝑧 = 𝛼𝑧
√𝐵𝑧
0,288
Horizontal ξ𝑥 = 𝛼𝑥
√𝐵𝑥

25
 0,15𝛼𝛳
Rocking/Pitching ξ𝛳,𝜓 =
(1 + 𝑛𝛳,𝜓 𝐵𝛳,𝜓 )√𝑛𝛳,𝜓 𝐵𝛳,𝜓
0,5
Twisting ξ𝛺 =
1 + 2𝐵𝛺

6) Resonance Frequency fres, (Hz)

For vertical ang horizontal translation check:

2 ξ 2>1 If yes, resonance not possible

2 ξ 2 <1 a resonance occurs, increase trial dimensions of foundation or choose a

rotation speed of machine so that there will be no resonance

For rocking and pitching:

𝑓0
𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑠 =
√1 − 2ξ2

7) Displacement Response, (m or mm, rad)

∑𝑀𝑧 𝐹𝑧𝑜
𝒁=
𝑘𝑧

∑𝑀𝑥 𝐹𝑥𝑜
𝑿=
𝑘𝑥

∑𝑀𝛳 𝐹𝛳𝑜
𝜭=
𝑘𝛳

∑𝑀𝜓 𝐹𝜓𝑜
𝝍=
𝑘𝜓

8) Total displacement, (m or mm)

𝒁t = Z + ϴ ∙ 𝑅ℎ𝑥 + 𝛳 ∙ 𝑅ℎ𝑦
𝑿t = X + ψ ∙ 𝑅𝑣
𝒀t = ϴ ∙ 𝑅𝑣

Rhy- Horizontal distance from center to edge of footing in the y-direction, m

Rhx- Horizontal distance from center to edge of footing in the x-direction, m

26
Rv- Vertical distance from base to horizontal machine load, m
9) Transmissibility Factor

√1 + (2ξ𝑟)2
𝑻𝑧,𝑥,𝛳,𝜓 =
√(1 − 𝑟 2 )2 + (2ξ𝑟)2

10) Transmitted force

𝑃𝑉 = ∑𝑇𝐹𝑧𝑜 , 𝑘𝑁
𝑃𝑅 = ∑𝑇𝐹𝑥𝑜 , 𝑘𝑁
𝑃𝑇𝜓 = ∑𝑇𝐹𝑧𝜓 , 𝑘𝑁 ∗ 𝑚
𝑃𝑇𝛳 = ∑𝑇𝐹𝑧𝛳 , 𝑘𝑁 ∗ 𝑚
Check for:
1) Static conditions
✓ Static beating capacity. Proportion of footing area for 50% of Sall
Pstat<0,5*Sall
Where Pstat= W(footing+machine)/(L*B)
✓ Static settlement must be uniform; C.G. of footing and machine should
be within 5% of each linear dimension
✓ Bearing capacity: static plus dynamic loads. The Magnification factor
should preferably be less than 1,5. The sum of static and dynamic loads should
not create bearing pressure greater than 75% of the Sall.
Transmitted Dynamic Vertical force Pv
Transmitted moments PTψ2 = PTψ + PR* Rv + Pv*(dimension from CG of
compressor to combination CG of compressor and motor)
𝑃𝑉 𝑃𝑇𝛳 ∗ 0,15 𝑃𝑇𝜓2 ∗ 0,15
𝑃𝑑𝑦𝑛 = ± ±
𝐿∗𝐵 𝐿 ∗ 𝐵2 𝐿2 ∗ 𝐵
Total static plus dynamic bearing pressure= Pdyn1+Pstat should be <0,75*Sall
✓ Total upward pressure= Pdyn2+Pstat should be >0, means that there is no
uplift
✓ Wfooting/Wmachine should be ≥ 3
2) Limiting dynamic conditions
✓ Resonance. The acting frequencies of the machine should have at least
difference of ±20% with the resonance frequency. 0,8𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑠 ≥ 𝑓 ≥ 1,2𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑠 [1]

27
7 Analysis
Design of dynamically loaded foundations is a complex and volume process; all
factors bear their meanings. How do machine or soil data affect the calculation
and what would it be to change only one of them? Let us take a few
characteristics and find out the relations. As it was mentioned above amplitudes
and frequencies are one of the most important and decisive parameters.

Graph 1. Influence of machine weight on resonant frequency.

18,00 16,33
15,82 15,35
16,00 14,91 14,52
14,15 13,81 13,49
13,2 12,92
14,00 12,66
RESONANSE FREQUENCY, HZ

11,56
12,00 10,7
9,45
10,00 8,55
7,870
7,330 6,89
8,00 6,52
6,00
4,00
2,00
0,00
100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 250 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
STATIC WEIGHT OF MACHINREY, KN

With all constant parameters of foundation and soil, check how does the static
weight of machine affect the foundation-machine-soil system resonance check.
The rotation speed of the machine is 327 rpm or f=5,45 Hz. Increasing the
weight of the machine decreases the resonance frequency so that the
frequency of the foundation is close to the frequency of the machine. To avoid
resonance, the difference between these two frequencies should be 20% less
or more: 0,8𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑠 ≥ 𝑓 ≥ 1,2𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑠 . So that when the value of the machine weight is
900kN, the resonant frequency is fres=6,52Hz. And the resonant check is: 6,52 ∙
0,8 = 5,216 < 5,45; resonance is possible. However, this situation is unlikely,
because the ratio of the weight of the foundation to the weight of the machine
must be greater than 3. This condition provides a well-balanced system. In this
case, the weight of the machine is too big. The diagram shows a large margin

28
relative to the weight of the machine: the weight of the machine must be too
large not to pass the resonance check.

8 Material recommendations

8.2 Concrete
It is recommended to use concrete C30/37. The design rules are presented in
Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures SFS-EN1992-1-1

8.3 Reinforcement
It is recommended to use bars a500hw.
8.4 Grout
Grouting is used to completely fill the gap between a non-precise top elevation
of a concrete foundation block and the machined bottom of the equipment base.
Grouting materials (either cement or epoxy based) have to withstand vertical
load, while horizontal movement of a machine is restrained by the clamping
force of the properly torqued anchoring system against the machinery grout.
Grouting material must be able to withstand prolonged compressive loads, at
equipment-operating temperatures, without creeping or allowing the base to
deflect, as this will disturb the alignment of the moving parts of the machine.
Grouting also provides an inert, impervious barrier between machine fluids and
concrete block.
It is recommended to use MasterFlow648. MasterFlow 648 is an epoxy resin-
based precision grout used to secure critical equipment for proper alignment
and transmission of static and dynamic loads. With carefully balanced physical
properties and excellent resistance to chemical attack, elevated service
temperatures, vibration and torque, MasterFlow 648 is formulated for easy
installation, with good flow characteristics suitable for pouring or pumping, low
dust generation and soap and water cleanup. [8]

9 Pile foundations
Pile foundations (Figure 13)
Any of the foundation types mentioned above can be supported directly on the g
round or on piles. It is advisable to build a pile foundation in cases where an

29
incompressible soil layer is so deep that it is impossible to build other types of
foundations, namely in the case of building a foundation on weak soils (for
example, on peat soils or in swampy areas). Piles transfer stresses to the base
soils through the side surface (by friction) and through the lower end. Various
types of piles are used including drilled piers, auger cast piles, and driven piles.
Pilings are required when the soil is:
• too soft to support the combined deadweight of machinery and foundation so
that the soil bearing capacity or the limits for settlement are exceeded;
• the soil is not stiff enough to resist vibration forces and deflections;
• water table is too high or variable to assure consistent soil properties over
time.

The introduction of piles in a soil stratum makes the soilsystem stiffer. Due to
this both natural frequency and amplitude of vibration are affected. In all
vibration related problems, resonance needs to be avoided. Therefore, the
natural frequency of the soil-pile-foundation system has to be evaluated in
analysis and design. Dynamic analysis of a soil-pile-foundation system requires
an evaluation of the natural frequency and displacement amplitudes of the
system for a particular loading sequence. [9]

Figure 13. Pile foundation [4]

30
Example of calculation spring and damping constants for the pile-supported block of
Figure 14.
Given data:
Piles: precast concrete 300x300 mm square
Lp=9,1 m
Ep=27800 MPa ϒp=23,6 kN/m3 μp=0,15
Soil: G’=17700 kPa μs=0,33 ϒs=16,5 Kn/m3
Other: ω=179,2 rad/sec
Solution:

𝐴𝑝 0,3 ∗ 0,3
𝑟0 = √ = √ = 0,169𝑚
𝜋 𝜋
𝐿𝑝 9,1
= = 54 > 30 (𝑂𝐾 𝑡𝑜 𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝐹𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑒 15)
𝑟0 0,169

𝐺′ 17700 ∗ 9,81
𝑉𝑠 = √ = √ = 103 𝑚/𝑠𝑒𝑐
ϒ𝑠 16,5

Figure 14. [5]

𝐸𝑝 27,8𝐸 + 6 ∗ 9,81
𝑉𝑝 = √ = √ = 3400 𝑚/𝑠𝑒𝑐
ϒ𝑝 23,6

𝑉𝑠 103
= = 0,0303 (𝑢𝑠𝑒 0,030 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝐹𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑒 15)
𝑉𝑝 3400
ϒs 16,5
= = 0,70
ϒp 23,6
𝑏ℎ3 0,34
𝐼𝑝 = = = 0,6750𝐸 − 3 𝑚4
12 12
For torsion constant J use an equivalent round pile based on r0, or
𝜋𝑟04 𝜋 ∗ 0,1694
𝐽= = = 0,1281𝐸 − 2 𝑚4
2 2
The dimensionless frequency factor a0 is computed as
𝜔𝑟0 179,2 ∗ 0,169
𝑎0 = = = 0,29
𝑉𝑠 103
With this several data computed, we can compute the several spring and
damping constants using equations given in Figure 15 with fi,i values from
Figure 16 (E,A,I,J are pile values):

31
Vertical:
𝐸𝐴 27800 ∗ 0,32
𝐾𝑧 = 𝑓18,1 = ∗ 0,037 = 547,8 𝑀𝑁/𝑚
𝑟0 0,169
𝐸𝐴 27800 ∗ 0,09
𝑐𝑧 = 𝑓18,2 = ∗ 0,016 = 0,389 𝑀𝑁 ∗ 𝑠/𝑚
𝑉𝑠 103
Horizontal:
𝐸𝐼 17800 ∗ 0,6750𝐸 − 3
𝐾ℎ = 3 𝑓11,1 = ∗ 0,018 = 44,8 𝑀𝑁/𝑚
𝑟0 0,1693
𝐸𝐼 12,015
𝑐ℎ = 2 𝑓11,2 = 0,1692 ∗ 103 ∗ 0,043 = 0,1756 𝑀𝑁 ∗ 𝑠/𝑚
𝑟0 𝑉𝑠

Rocking:
𝐸𝐼 12,015
𝐾𝛳 = 𝑓7,1 = ∗ 0,345 = 24,53 𝑀𝑁 ∗ 𝑚
𝑟0 0,169
𝐸𝐼 12,015
𝑐𝛳 = 𝑓7,2 = ∗ 0,245 = 0,02858 𝑀𝑁 ∗ 𝑠 ∗ 𝑚
𝑉𝑠 103
Torsion:
𝐸𝑝 27800
𝐺′𝑝 = = = 12000 𝑀𝑃𝑎
2(1 + μ𝑝 ) 2 ∗ 1,15
𝐺′𝑝 𝐽 12000 ∗ 0,1281𝐸 − 2
𝐾𝛺 = 𝑓12,1 = ∗ 0,105 = 9,55 𝑀𝑁 ∗ 𝑚
𝑟0 0,169
𝐺′𝑝 𝐽 15,372
𝑐𝛺 = 𝑓12,2 = ∗ 0,011 = 0,00164 𝑀𝑁 ∗ 𝑠 ∗ 𝑚
𝑉𝑠 103
With these data and the large s/D ratio = 1,8/0,3=6, the vertical spring and
damping constants will be summed to obtain a global value for the nine piles as
Kz=9*547,8=4930,2 MN/m
cz=9*0,389=3,501 MN*s/m
We can compute the block mass from the weight of block and machinery shown
in Figure 16.
m=4,12/9,81=0,4201 MN*s2/m
and, using formula

0,296
𝑧=
√[4930,2 − (0,4201 ∗ 179,2)2 ]2 + (3,501 ∗ 179,2)2
= 0,3058𝐸 − 3𝑚 𝑜𝑟 0,306𝑚𝑚

32
Figure 15. Pile spring and damping constants [9]

Figure 16. fi,i values [9]

10 Conclusion
The foundations of machines with dynamic loads are sources of waves
propagating in the soil, which have a detrimental effect on the nearby structures
of buildings and structures, objects with equipment and equipment that is
sensitive to vibrations, as well as residential buildings.
Vibrations spreading from machine foundations can cause uneven precipitation
of foundations and additional stresses in nearby buildings and structures, which
cause cracks in them and even their destruction, affecting the operation of

33
some machines (for example, precise machines), measuring equipment and
etc.

To reduce the level of propagating vibrations, various measures are used:

choose the most rational dimensions and configurations of the foundation,
change the rigidity of the base, connect several foundations with a common
slab, apply active and passive vibration isolation, dynamic oscillation dampers
and attached plates that balance counterweights, adjust the rotational speed of
the machines, etc.

The work presents various design criteria and methods and procedures of
analysis, design, and construction currently applied to dynamic equipment
foundations by industry practitioners. This document provides general
guidelines with reference materials, rather than specifying requirements for
adequate design. [4]

34
List of references

1. Design of Structures and Foundations for Vibrating Machines. Suresh

Arya, Michael O’Neill, George Pincus
2. Geotechnical Engineering Handbook. Braja M.Das
3. Foundations for vibrating machines. Shamsher Prakash, Vijay K.Puri
4. Foundations for Dynamic Equipment. James P.Lee, Yelena S.Golod
5. Foundation analysis and Design. Fifth edition. Joseph E.Bowles, P.E.,
S.E.
6. European Forum Reciprocating Compressors Report. First edition, 6
November 2016
7. Vibrations of machine foundations and surrounding soil. P.C.J.
Hoogenboom, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
8. https://assets.master-builders-
solutions.basf.com/shared%20documents/eb%20construction%20chemcials%2
0-%20us/construction%20systems/data%20guides/masterflow/basf-masterflow-
648-tds.pdf
9. Parametric analysis of pile foundations under dynamic loads. Hasan
Rangwala, S. Mukerjee, Swami Saran
10. Advanced Foundation Engineering. T.G. Sitharam

35
Appendices
Appendix 1 Mass moment of Inertia of common geometric shapes

36
 Excel file for calculation dynamically loaded foundations

Author Date
Arina Belovolova 30.01.2019 CG distances
1 4,00 Ftom the top of foundation to CG of compressor

CG of compressor
Z

Axis of rotation

Y
Axis of Rocking

X
C

B
L Legend
value must be entered manually

Density of concrete 24,516 kN/m³

Foundation dimentions
Static weight of machinrey Static weight of footing Depth of foundation C= 1,2 m
W= 196,13 kN W= 1470,960 kN Length of foundation L= 10 m
Mass of machinrey Mass of footing Width of foundation B= 5 m
m= 19,99 kN∙sec² m= 149,94 kN∙sec²
m m
Total weight (machinrey+footing) Rotation speed of machinrey ω
W= 1667,09 kN ω= 327 rpm 5,45 Hz

Soil parameters
Soil density ϒ= 18 kN/m³
Shear Modulus G= 21000,00 kN/m²
Poisson's Ratio µ= 0,45
Damping ξs= 0,05

№ Paramerer Formula Vertical Z-direction Horizontal X-direction Rocking ψ-direction

Iψ(machine)=
m= W m= 169,94 m= 169,94 540,61
g kN∙sec² kN∙sec² Iψ(footing)=
1 Mass m, Mass moment of Inertia I g=9,81 m/sec² m m 330,38
Mass moments of inertia are from Total=
Appendix 1 870,99
kN*m*sec²

2 Equivalent radius r₀, (m) Table 1 3,99 3,99 3,39

3 Mass ratio B Table 2 0,20 0,28 0,217

L/B= 2,00 L/B= 2,00 L/B= 0,50

4 Spring constant coefficient α Figure 11
2,15 0,95 0,47

5 Spring constant k, (kN/m) Table 3 5,80E+05 4,09E+05 4,49E+06

6 Damping ξ Table 4 0,949 0,543 0,264

7 Total damping ξ ξs+ξ 0,95 0,54 0,31

1 𝑘
8 Natural frequency f₀, (Hz) f₀= 9,31 7,81 11,43
2𝜋 𝑚

𝑓₀ 2ξ² > 1
9 Resonanse frequency fres, (Hz) fres= fres= 12,19 fres= 12,76
1−2ξ² resonanse not possible

Compressor unbalanced inertia forces(kN)

10 Machine parameter V₀ = 2,793 H₀ = 62,488 T₀ = 324,938
and moments(kN*m)
r₁= 0,59 r₁= 0,70 r₁= 0,48
1 ω
11
M= ; r=
Magnification factor 1−𝑟 2 ²+(2ξ𝑟)² 𝑘
𝑚 M₁= 0,774 M₁= 1,093 M₁= 1,21

0,000004 m 0,0001670 m
∑𝑀(𝑧,𝑥,ψ)𝐹(𝑧,𝑥,ψ)
12 Vibration amplitude 𝑍, 𝑋, ψ= or or 0,00008740 rad
𝑘(𝑧,𝑥,ψ)
0,003726 mm 0,166965 mm

13 Component of rocking oscillation,m 0,0002185012 0,0004544826

14 Resultant vibration amplitude, mm (12)+(13) Zt= 0,2222268 Xt= 0,6214472

1 + (2ξ𝑟)²
15 Transmissibility factor T 𝑇= T₁= 1,158 T₁= 1,371 T₁= 1,260
1 − 𝑟2 2 + (2ξ𝑟)²

16 Transmitted force P 𝑃 = ∑𝑇 ∗ 𝐹 3,23 kN 85,68 kN 409,35 kN*m

Dynamic analyses

Actual soil pressure Pstat= 33,34 kN/m²

Must be < than 0,5 Static Allowable Bearing Capacity Sall= 145 kN/m² OK

Dead load 1667,09 kN P= 33,66 kN/m² Must be < than 0,75 Static Allowable Bearing Capacity OK
P= 33,16 kN/m² Must be < than 0,75 Static Allowable Bearing Capacity OK
kN
P= 33,03 kN/m² Must be >0 NO UPLIFT

Resonant frequency f ˂ 0,8 fres or > 1,2 fres

Rocking operating speed 5,45 less than 10,21 or more than 15,31 OK

Wfooting = 7,50 Should be > or = 3,0 for well-balanced centrifugal machines. OK

Wmachine
 Excel file for calculation dynamically loaded foundations

Author Date
Arina Belovolova 30.01.2019
CG of compressor Z CG distances
and motor Axis of Torsional rotation 1 1,76 Ftom the top of foundation to CG of compressor
2 1,62 Ftom the top of foundation to CG of motor
CG of motor
3 1,67 Ftom the top of foundation to combination CG of compressor and motor
CG of compressor 4 4 1,83 Ftom CG of compressor to combination CG of compressor and motor

3 2
1
X
Axis of Pitching

Earth level

Y
Axis of Rocking
C h
Legend
value must be entered manually
B

Density of concrete 24,516 kN/m³

Foundation dimentions
Static weight of machinrey Static weight of footing Depth of foundation C= 3,5 m
W= 82,87 kN W= 3432,24 kN Length of foundation L= 8 m
Mass of machinrey Mass of footing Width of foundation B= 5 m
m= 8,45 kN∙sec² m= 349,87 kN∙sec² Depth of foundation embedment below grade h= 2 m
m m
Total weight (machinrey+footing) Rotation speed of machinrey ω
W= 3515,11 kN Primary 1000 rpm 16,67 Hz
Secondary 900 rpm 15,00 Hz
Soil parameters
Soil density ϒ= 17,59 kN/m³
Shear Modulus G= 103421,00 kN/m²
Poisson's Ratio µ= 0,35
Damping ξs= 0,05

№ Paramerer Formula Vertical Z-direction Horizontal X-direction Rocking ψ-direction Pitching ϴ-direction

Iψ(machine)= Iϴ(machine)=
m= W m= 358,32 m= 358,32 225,79 225,79
g kN∙sec² kN∙sec² Iψ(footing)= Iϴ(footing)=
Mass m,
1 g=9,81 m/sec² m m 2223,14 1086,06
Mass moment of Inertia I
Mass moments of inertia are from Total= Total=
Appendix 1 2448,93 1311,85
kN*m*sec² kN*m*sec²
Spring constant calculation

2 Equivalent radius r₀, (m) Table 1 3,57 3,57 4,06 3,21

Embedment coefficients for spring

3 Table 5 1,22 1,51 1,42 1,55
constants η

L/B= 1,60 L/B= 1,60 L/B= 1,60 L/B= 0,63

4 Spring constant coefficient α Figure 11
2,15 0,95 0,58 0,45

5 Spring constant k, (kN/m) Table 6 2,64E+06 2,53E+06 4,21E+07 2,22E+07

Damping calculation

6 Damping ratio embedment factor α Table 7 1,533 2,244 1,125 1,223

7 Mass ratio B Table 2 0,71 0,89 0,302 0,52

8 Effective damping coefficient Figure 12 - - 1,600 1,630

9 Damping ξ Table 8 0,771 0,686 0,16 0,11

10 Total damping ξ ξs+ξ 0,82 0,74 0,21 0,16

1 𝑘
11 Natural frequency f₀, (Hz) f₀= 13,66 13,38 20,87 20,71
2𝜋 𝑚

𝑓₀ 2ξ² > 1 2ξ² > 1

12 Resonanse frequency fres, (Hz) fres= fres= 21,89 fres= 21,24
1−2ξ² resonanse not possible resonanse not possible

Compressor unbalanced inertia F₁ = 0,000 F₁ = 1,970 M₁ = 20,280 M₁ = 24,400

13 Machine parameter
forces(kN) and moments(kN*m)
F₂ = 0,000 F₂ = 0,947 M₂ = 0,1166 M₂ = 0,000
r₁= 1,22 r₁= 1,25 r₁= 0,80 r₁= 0,80
1 ω
M= ; r= r₂= 1,10 r₂= 0,72 r₂= 0,72
14 Magnification factor 1−𝑟 2 ²+(2ξ𝑟)² 𝑘
𝑚 M₁= 0,48 M₁= 0,52 M₁= 2,01 M₁= 2,30
M₂= 0,55 M₂= 1,75 M₂= 1,90
0,0000000 m 0,0000004 m
∑𝑀(𝑧,𝑥,ψ,ϴ)𝐹(𝑧,𝑥,ψ,ϴ)
15 Displacement Response 𝑍, 𝑋, ψ, ϴ= or or 0,0000010 rad 0,0000025 rad
𝑘(𝑧,𝑥,ψ,ϴ)
0,000000 mm 0,000407 mm

𝑍𝑡 = 𝑍 + ψ ∙ Rhx + ϴ ∙ 𝑅ℎ𝑦 X= 0,005439853

16 Total displsement,mm 𝑋𝑡 = 𝑋 + ψ ∙ 𝑅𝑉 Z= 0,010228
𝑌𝑡 = ϴ ∙ 𝑅𝑉 Y= 0,01309733

1 + (2ξ𝑟)² T₁= 1,086 T₁= 2,123 T₁= 2,377

17 Transmissibility factor T 𝑇= T₂= 1,136 T₁= 1,091 T₂= 1,827 T₂= 1,945
1 − 𝑟2 2 + (2ξ𝑟)²

18 Transmitted force P 𝑃 = ∑𝑇 ∗ 𝐹 0,00 kN 2,15 kN 43,27 kN*m 58,00 kN*m

Dynamic analyses

Transmitted Dynamic vertical force Pv= 0,00 kN

Transmitted Moments Pr= 54,57 Kn*m

Pdyn= 0,07 kN/m²

Dead load 3515,11 kN -0,07 kN/m²

kN Pstat= 87,88 kN/m²

Total Downward pressure 87,95 kN/m²

Must be < than 0,75 Static Allowable Bearing Capacity 145 OK
Total Upward pressure 87,81 kN/m²
Must be > 0 NO UPLIFT

Resonant frequency f ˂ 0,8 fres or > 1,2 fres

Rocking operating speed 16,67 less than 17,51 or more than 26,27 OK
Pitching operating speed 15,00 less than 17,00 or more than 25,49 OK