Exercise During Pregnancy Protects Against Hypertension and Macrosomia: Randomized Clinical Trial

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

Original Research ajog.

org

OBSTETRICS
Exercise during pregnancy protects against hypertension
and macrosomia: randomized clinical trial
Ruben Barakat, PhD; Mireia Pelaez, PhD; Yaiza Cordero, PhD; Maria Perales, PhD; Carmina Lopez, MSc;
Javier Coteron, PhD; Michelle F. Mottola, PhD, FACSM

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of all pregnancies with some STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial was used. Women were
form of hypertension can be up to 10%, with the rates of diagnosis randomized into an exercise group (N ¼ 382) or a control group (N ¼ 383)
varying according to the country and population studied and the receiving standard care. The exercise group trained 3 d/wk (50-55 min/
criteria used to establish the diagnosis. Prepregnancy obesity and session) from gestational weeks 9-11 until weeks 38-39. The 85 training
excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) of all body mass index (BMI) sessions involved aerobic exercise, muscular strength, and flexibility.
categories have been associated with maternal hypertensive disor- RESULTS: High attendance to the exercise program regardless of BMI
ders and linked to macrosomia (>4000 g) and low birthweight showed that pregnant women who did not exercise are 3 times more likely
(<2500 g). No large randomized controlled trial with high adherence to develop hypertension (odds ratio [OR], 2.96; 95% confidence interval
to an exercise program has examined pregnancy-induced hyper- [CI], 1.29e6.81, P ¼ .01) and are 1.5 times more likely to gain excessive
tension and these associated issues. We investigated whether weight if they do not exercise (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.06e2.03, P ¼ .02).
women adherent (!80% attendance) to an exercise program initi- Pregnant women who do not exercise are also 2.5 times more likely to give
ated early showed a reduction in pregnancy-induced hypertension birth to a macrosomic infant (OR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.03e6.20, P ¼ .04).
and excessive GWG in all prepregnancy BMI categories, and CONCLUSION: Maternal exercise may be a preventative tool for hy-
determined if maternal exercise protected against macrosomia and pertension and excessive GWG, and may control offspring size at birth
low birthweight. while reducing comorbidities related to chronic disease risk.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the impact of a program of su-
pervised exercise throughout pregnancy on the incidence of pregnancy- Key words: exercise, gestational weight gain, hypertension, interven-
induced hypertension. tion, outcome, pregnancy

Introduction pregnancy in a normotensive woman, and cardiovascular disease risk in the


The prevalence of all pregnancies with and most frequently including protein- offspring.10 It has been suggested that
some form of hypertension can be uria.2 Preeclampsia may or may not interventions focus on reducing modi-
up to 10%,1 with the rates of diagnosis progress to eclampsia with the occur- fiable risk factors (one of the most
varying according to the country and rence of seizures and extreme maternal prominent being excessive GWG)
population studied and the criteria used and fetal complications.5 Severity of should be incorporated into prenatal
to establish the diagnosis.2 Although symptoms can accelerate rapidly, leading care to improve the health of the mother
these clinical issues may range in severity to immediate delivery regardless of and reduce perinatal complications11
from trivial to life threatening,1 elevated gestational age.5 Although the origin of and cardiovascular risk.
blood pressure (BP) remains the leading pregnancy hypertension is unknown,6 Epidemiological evidence suggests
cause of maternal, fetal, and neonatal many theories exist suggesting that the that women who participate in regular
morbidity and mortality.2,3 Gestational pathophysiological processes that lead to physical activity have a reduced risk of
hypertension has been defined as preeclampsia begin in early pregnancy, developing pregnancy-induced hyper-
elevated BP4 that develops >20 weeks of even though maternal symptoms do not tension12 and preeclampsia.13-15 These
gestation in a previously normotensive appear until mid to late gestation.7 studies are based on retrospective ques-
woman, without proteinuria.1 These Although the causal link to tionnaires in case-control cohorts and,
women are at high risk (15-45%) for pregnancy-induced hypertension is un- as recent reviews concluded, there is a
developing preeclampsia1 with high BP,5 known, there are maternal factors, such critical need for well-designed random-
typically appearing >20 weeks of as excessive gestational weight gain ized controlled trials (RCT).16-18 The
(GWG) regardless of prepregnancy aim of the present study was to examine
body mass index (BMI), and maternal the impact of a program of supervised
Cite this article as: Barakat R, Pelaez M, Cordero Y, et al. obesity8 that increase the risk for exercise throughout pregnancy on the
Exercise during pregnancy protects against hypertension hypertensive disorders.9 In addition, incidence of pregnancy-induced hyper-
and macrosomia: randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet there are downstream consequences of tension. We hypothesized that adherent
Gynecol 2016;214:649.e1-8.
pregnancy-induced hypertension that women (!80% attendance) to an exer-
0002-9378/$36.00 have been linked to neonatal birthweight cise program initiated early in pregnancy
ª 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.11.039 (macrosomia >4000 g; low birthweight (9-11 weeks’ gestation) will have a
<2500 g),10 leading to childhood obesity decreased incidence of pregnancy-

MAY 2016 American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 649.e1


Original Research OBSTETRICS ajog.org

planning to give birth in the same ob-


FIGURE
stetric hospital and not under medical
Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 flow diagram
follow-up throughout pregnancy were
of study participants
not included in the study, neither were
women having any serious medical
conditions (contraindications) that pre-
vented them from exercising safely.19
After women provided written
informed consent, 840 healthy gravidae
were randomized (ratio 1:1) to either an
exercise intervention (n ¼ 420) or usual
care (n ¼ 420) group. The participant
randomization assignment followed an
allocation concealment process using a
random numbers table. Assessment staff
members were blinded to assignment.
The randomization process (sequence
generation, allocation concealment, and
implementation) was conducted by 3
different individuals. To reduce partici-
pant drop out and to maintain adher-
ence to the training program, all sessions
were accompanied with music, and were
performed in an air-conditioned well-lit
exercise room at the hospital. A qualified
fitness specialist carefully supervised
every training session with the assistance
of an obstetrician.

Exercise intervention
The randomization was performed in
waves so that each wave had between
10-12 participants in the exercise group,
and 10-12 women in the control group.
The exercise group trained 3 d/wk
(50-55 min/session), from weeks 9-11 of
pregnancy, to the end of the third
Barakat et al. Early maternal exercise prevents hypertension. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016. trimester (weeks 38-39). An average of
85 training sessions was originally plan-
ned for each participant in the event of
induced hypertension and that exercise in 2000. The research protocol was no preterm delivery. The intervention
will protect against the initiation of this reviewed and approved by the ethics re- involved aerobic exercise, aerobic dance,
disease in women of all prepregnancy view board of Hospital Severo Ochoa muscular strength, and flexibility, and
BMI categories, while also protecting (Madrid, Spain). The onset of patient met the standards of the American
against excessive GWG. In addition, we enrollment was November 2012. Congress of Obstetricians and Gyne-
hypothesized that exercise protects cologists.19 Women used a heart rate
against macrosomia (>4000 g) and low Participants and randomization monitor (Accurex Plus; Kempel,
birthweight (<2500 g) and other preg- A total of 1100 Spanish-speaking Finland) during the training sessions
nancy complications. (Caucasian) pregnant women from pri- (heart rate was consistently <70% of
mary care medical centers (Figure) were age-predicted maximum) and the rating
Materials and Methods assessed for eligibility. Women with of perceived exertion scale ranged from
The present RCT (identifier: singleton and uncomplicated pregnan- 12-14 (somewhat hard).20
NCT01723098) was conducted from cies (no type 1, type 2, or gestational Each exercise session was preceded
December 2011 through January 2015 diabetes mellitus [GDM] at baseline) and followed by a gradual warm-up and
following the ethical guidelines of the with no history or risk of preterm cool-down period (both 10-12 minutes’
Declaration of Helsinki, last modified delivery were included. Women not duration) and consisted of walking and

649.e2 American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MAY 2016


ajog.org OBSTETRICS Original Research

light static stretching of most muscle occupational activity, previous physical fetal outcomes from the medical
groups. The cool-down period included activity habits, smoking status, previous records.
relaxation and pelvic floor exercises. preterm birth, and previous miscarriage
The main exercise session (25-30 mi- were obtained at the first prenatal Statistical analysis
nutes) included moderate resistance ex- visit either by reviewing the medical Power calculations for the primary
ercise performed through the full range records or by questionnaire. Inclusion/ outcome (diagnosis of hyperten-
of motion and engaged major muscle exclusion criteria were determined at this sion)23,24 used a prevalence of w4% in
groups (pectoral, back, shoulder, upper initial visit by the attending obstetrician. the intervention group and 10% in the
and lower limb muscles). One set (10-12 usual care group. Under these as-
repetitions) was conducted using bar- Outcomes sumptions, a 2-sample comparison (c2)
bells (2 kg/exercise) or low-to-medium Primary outcome with a 5% level of significance and a
resistance (elastic) bands (Therabands, Diastolic and systolic arterial BP were statistical power of 0.90 gave a study
Hygenic Corp., Catalonia, Spain). Exer- measured at every visit to the obstetri- population of 378 patients in each
cises in the supine position were not cian as part of standard care (once each group. Assuming a maximum lost to
performed for >2 minutes. trimester) and were obtained from follow-up of 10%, approximately 416
medical records. Criteria for measuring women were needed for each group at
Usual care (control) group BP3 were as follows: baseline.
Women randomly assigned to the con- For treatment group comparisons, we
trol group received general advice from 1) Measured in the sitting position with analyzed continuous and nominal data
their health care provider about the the arm at the level of the heart using with a Student t test for unpaired data
positive effects of physical activity. Par- an appropriately sized cuff; and c2 tests, respectively. We used
ticipants in the control group had their 2) Korotkoff phase V was used to logistic regression analysis to examine
usual visits with health care providers designate diastolic BP; the interaction between study group
during pregnancy, which were equal to 3) Diagnosis of hypertension was (training and control) on the likelihood
the exercise group. Women were not defined as a diastolic BP of !90 mm of developing hypertension (primary
discouraged from exercising on their Hg and a systolic BP !140 mm Hg,4 outcome), gaining excessive gestational
own. However, women in the control based on the average of at least 2 weight (secondary outcome), developing
group were asked by telephone about measurements, using the same arm GDM (secondary outcome), delivering a
their exercise once each trimester using a and recorded in the medical file. preterm infant (secondary outcome),
decision algorithm. and modifying other pregnancy out-
Question 1: Since the beginning of The primary outcome was the num- comes (length of newborn, Apgar scores
pregnancy, have you exercised in your ber (percentage/incidence) of women at 1 and 5 minutes after delivery, and
leisure time, in a supervised program, or who developed hypertension during cord blood pH; secondary outcomes) as
on your own? pregnancy. separate endpoints after controlling for
a. Answer: No. maternal age, parity, smoking status,
b. Answer: Yes. Secondary outcomes occupational activity during pregnancy,
Question 2 (if the previous response Total GWG was calculated on the basis of prepregnancy exercise habits, and
was “b”): Given 7 days a week, how many the weight at the last clinic visit before prepregnancy BMI. We also used logistic
days per week did you exercise? delivery minus the pregravid weight regression analysis to examine the
(from hospital records) and stratified by interaction between study group
a. Answer: <3 days.
prepregnancy BMI categories based on (training and control) and birthweight
b. Answer: !3 days.
the Institute of Medicine (IOM) guide- categories as separate endpoints on the
Question 3 (if the previous response lines.21 Excessive body weight gain was probability of having a newborn with
was “b”): Taking into account the total determined by IOM guidelines21 for macrosomia (>4000 g) and on the like-
duration of physical exercise continuously, prepregnancy BMI categories for each lihood of having a low-birthweight
how long did you exercise every day? woman: >18 kg for underweight; >16 (<2500 g) infant (secondary outcomes)
a. Answer: <20 minutes each day. kg for normal weight; >11.5 kg for after the same adjustment. We
b. Answer: !20 minutes each day. overweight; and >9 kg for obese. Diag- conducted statistical analyses using
Interpretation of the decision algo- nosis of GDM was also included from software (SPSS, Version 18.0; IBM Corp,
rithm: Pregnant women in the control medical records. Armonk, NY, and SAS, Version 9.3; SAS
group who reached level “b” of these 3 Birthweight was recorded from hos- Institute, Cary, NC). The level of signif-
questions were excluded from the study. pital perinatal records. Newborns were icance was set to #.05.
classified as having macrosomia when
Participant demographics birthweight was >4000 g and low Results
Demographic and other information birthweight was defined as <2500 g.22 A total of 840 pregnant women met the
(pregravid weight and height), parity, We obtained other maternal and criteria. After randomization, 38 women

MAY 2016 American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 649.e3


Original Research OBSTETRICS ajog.org

statistical differences were found be-


TABLE 1
tween groups.
Characteristics of exercise and control (usual care) groups at study entry
Control (n ¼ 383) Exercise (n ¼ 382) Hypertension and other pregnancy
Maternal characteristics outcomes
In the exercise vs control groups, exercise
Maternal age, y 31.8 $ 4.5 31.6 $ 4.2 reduced the incidence of hypertension
BMI, kg/m2 23.4 $ 4.2 23.6 $ 3.8 (2.1% vs 5.7%, P ¼ .009), preeclampsia
Blood pressure, mm Hg (0.5% vs 2.3%, P ¼ .03), and GDM
(2.4% vs 5.5%, P ¼ .03), respectively, in
Systolic 113.9 $ 13.8 113.5 $ 11.8
all women (Table 2). Exercise also pre-
Diastolic 67.5 $ 10.2 68.0 $ 8.4 vented excessive maternal weight gain
BMI categories, n/% (26.4% vs 34.2%, P ¼ .03, respectively)
Underweight 20/5.2 10/2.6 based on prepregnancy BMI21 compared
to the control women. Overall, the
Normal weight 259/67.6 258/67.5
exercising women gained less weight
Overweight 75/19.6 89/23.3 than the control women (12.1 $ 3.7 vs
Obese 29/7.6 25/6.5 12.9 $ 4.5 kg, P ¼ .01, respectively).
Occupational activity, n/% There were no differences between the
groups with regards to gestational age,
Sedentary job 148/38.6 171/44.8
type of delivery, birthweight, length,
Homemaker 93/24.3 72/18.9 head circumference, Apgar scores (1 and
Active job 142/37.1 139/36.4 5 minutes, expressed as the number of
Previous physical activity habits, n/% babies with !7), or umbilical cord blood
pH, P > .05. When birthweight was
Active 70/18.3 61/16.0
stratified by birthweight categories, ex-
Sedentary 313/81.7 321/84.0 ercise decreased the number of macro-
Parity, n/% somic babies (P ¼ .03) while increasing
None 229/59.8 259/67.8 the number of adequate-weight babies
(P ¼.01) compared to the control group.
1 127/33.2 100/26.2
There was no change in the number of
!2 27/7.1 23/6.0 babies born small (P ¼ .15). When
Smoking during pregnancy, n/% stratified by prepregnancy BMI category
Yes 54/14.1 40/10.5 (Table 3) exercise reduced the incidence
of hypertension (P ¼.02), and prevented
No 329/85.9 342/89.5
excessive GWG (P ¼ .01) and GDM
Previous miscarriage, n/% (P ¼ .03) compared to control women.
None 279/72.9 301/78.8 Exercise did not change preterm delivery
1 90/23.5 70/18.3 when stratified by BMI categories. When
newborn birthweight categories were
!2 14/3.7 11/2.9
stratified by maternal prepregnancy BMI
There are no statistical differences between groups at baseline (P > .05). Data are expressed as mean SD, unless categories, the incidence of macrosomia
otherwise indicated.
was reduced (P ¼ .03) (Table 3). The
BMI, body mass index.
Barakat et al. Early maternal exercise prevents hypertension. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016. incidence of low-birthweight babies did
not change in any of the maternal BMI
categories as a result of exercise. Inter-
in the exercise group were lost to follow- premature delivery (n ¼ 8), and personal estingly, when we stratified by parity
up because of discontinued intervention reasons (N ¼ 23). A final total of 765 categories (none, 1, or !2) (Table 4),
(N ¼ 17), ruptured membranes (N ¼ 3), pregnant women were analyzed with 382 being nulliparous was a determining
diagnosed incompetent cervix, obstetric in the exercise group and 383 in the factor for the presence of hypertension
risk of premature delivery (n ¼ 6), and control group (Figure). (odds ratio [OR], 0.32; 95% confidence
personal reasons (N ¼ 12). In all, 37 interval [CI], 0.11e0.93, P ¼ .02) and
participants in the control group were Maternal characteristics preterm delivery (OR, 0.51; 95% CI,
excluded from the study because of Personal data were collected from all 0.26e0.98, P ¼ .04) in women who did
persistent bleeding (n ¼ 6), diagnosed participants at the beginning of the not exercise. Furthermore, women who
incompetent cervix, obstetric risk of study as is shown in Table 1. No had !2 pregnancies and did not exercise

649.e4 American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MAY 2016


ajog.org OBSTETRICS Original Research

0.78e2.19, P ¼ .34). Other variables


TABLE 2
investigated that were not different
Effect of exercise on hypertension and other pregnancy outcomes
between groups included length of
in all participants
newborn, Apgar scores at 1 and 5 mi-
All (n ¼ 765) nutes after delivery, and cord blood pH.
Control (n ¼ 383) Exercise (n ¼ 382) P
However, pregnant women were 2.5
times more likely to give birth to a
Maternal hypertension, n/% 22/5.7 8/2.1 .009 macrosomic infant (OR, 2.53; 95% CI,
Preeclampsia, n/% 9/2.3 2/0.5 .03 1.03e6.20, P ¼ .04) if they did not
Maternal weight gain, kg 12.9 $ 4.5 12.1 $ 3.7 .01 exercise during pregnancy, and although
not significant, these women were also
Excessive maternal weight gain, n/% 131/34.2 101/26.4 .03
1.6 times more likely to deliver a low-
Gestational diabetes, n/% 21/5.5 9/2.4 .03 birthweight baby (OR, 1.6; 95% CI,
Gestational age, d 276.0 $ 13.0 277.3 $ 12.2 .11 0.83e3.09, P ¼ .15).
Preterm delivery, <37 wk, n/% 37/9.7 29/7.6 .31
Comment
Type of delivery, n/%
We examined the effects of physical
Normal 236/61.6 260/68.1 .06 training during pregnancy on the inci-
Instrumental 64/16.7 49/12.8 .13 dence of pregnancy-induced hyperten-
Cesarean 83/21.7 73/19.1 .38 sion regardless of prepregnancy BMI.
This novel approach used an integration
Newborn
of light resistance, toning, aerobic dance,
Birthweight, g 3218 $ 453 3252 $ 438 .29 and pelvic floor exercises in the training
Birthweight categories, g, n/% program, easily incorporated into a
Adequate 2500e4000 340/88.8 359/94 .01 structured exercise regime. It appears
that this program was equally liked by all
Low <2500 25/6.5 16/4.2 .15
BMI categories as indicated by the high
Macrosomia >4000 18/4.7 7/1.8 .03 adherence rate.
Birth length, cm 49.8 $ 2.1 50.0 $ 2.2 .11 Interventions focusing on reducing
Head circumference, cm 34.5 $ 1.5 34.4 $ 1.3 .47
modifiable risk factors (one of the most
prominent being excessive GWG)
Apgar score 1 min should be incorporated into prenatal
!7, n/% 359/93.7 366/95.8 .19 care to improve the health of the mother
Apgar score 5 min and reduce perinatal complications and
cardiovascular risk.11 Our exercise
!7, n/% 380/99.2 381/99.7 .31
intervention reduced the incidence of
pH of umbilical cord blood 7.28 $ 0.07 7.28 $ 0.07 .46 hypertension (3 times more likely) and
Data are expressed as mean $ SD, unless otherwise indicated. We analyzed continuous and nominal data with Student t test for prevented excessive GWG (1.5 times
unpaired data and c2 analyses, respectively.
Barakat et al. Early maternal exercise prevents hypertension. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016.
more likely), without changing gesta-
tional age, the incidence of preterm de-
livery, and method of delivery compared
to standard-care women after control-
may gain excessively (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, gain excessive weight if they did not ex- ling for confounding factors. Regardless
0.09e1.04, P ¼ .053). ercise (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.06e2.03, of prepregnancy BMI, exercise also
P ¼ .02). With GDM as the endpoint, reduced the incidence of macrosomia
Logistic regression analysis women were 2 times more likely to (by 2.5 times) and protected against low-
With the endpoint as hypertension, after develop GDM if they did not exercise birthweight infants.
controlling for maternal age, parity, during pregnancy, but this was not sig- Pregnancy-induced hypertension has
smoking status, occupation, activity nificant (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 0.91e4.6, no known cause but it is thought to
prepregnancy, and prepregnancy BMI, P ¼ .08). After screening for preterm develop early in gestation with symp-
pregnant women who did not exercise delivery risk factors (exclusion criteria toms occurring in mid to late preg-
were 3 times more likely to develop hy- before randomization), preterm delivery nancy,7 and may be a precursor to the
pertension during pregnancy (OR, 2.96; incidence was not different between development of preeclampsia.7,9
95% CI, 1.29e6.81, P ¼ .01). With the groups, however, women were 1.3 times Although preeclampsia was not our
endpoint as excessive GWG, pregnant more likely to deliver a preterm infant if primary outcome, the number of
women were 1.5 times more likely to they did not exercise (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, women who developed this disease was

MAY 2016 American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 649.e5


Original Research OBSTETRICS ajog.org

TABLE 3
Effect of exercise on hypertension and other pregnancy outcomes by prepregnancy body mass index categories
Body mass index categories
Underweight Normal weight Overweight Obese
Control Exercise Control Exercise Control Exercise Control Exercise
Variable (n ¼ 20) (n ¼ 10) (n ¼ 256) (n ¼ 257) (n ¼ 78) (n ¼ 90) (n ¼ 29) (n ¼ 25) P
Maternal hypertension 0 0 15/5.9 2/0.8 6/7.7 4/4.4 1/3.5 2/8.0 .02
Excessive maternal weight gain 4/20.0 1/10.0 71/27.7 39/15.2 41/52.6 50/55.6 15/51.7 11/44.0 .01
Gestational diabetes 3/15.0 0 13/5.1 6/2.3 4/5.1 2/2.2 1/3.5 1/4.0 .03
Preterm delivery, <37 wk 1/5.0 0 21/8.2 19/7.4 13/16.7 7/7.8 2/6.9 3/12.0 .31
Newborn birthweight categories
Adequate 2500e4000 g 18/90.0 8/80.0 232/90.6 240/93.4 63/80.8 88/97.8 27/93.1 23/92.0 .01
Low <2500 g 2/10.0 1/10.0 14/5.5 12/4.7 7/9.0 2/2.2 2/6.9 1/4.0 .15
Macrosomia >4000 g 0 1/10.0 10/3.9 5/1.9 8/10.3 0 0 1/4.0 .03
2
Data are expressed as n/%, unless otherwise indicated. P values are based on c analyses.
Barakat et al. Early maternal exercise prevents hypertension. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016.

lowered by the exercise intervention. If an pregnant women. Exercise may also pro- the ability to identify those women in the
exercise program started early in gestation tect against preeclampsia by reducing control group who did not remain
in asymptomatic low-risk women pre- maternal byproducts of oxidative stress, sedentary built into the study design.
vented hypertension (and potentially preventing endothelial dysfunction, and Interestingly, none of the control women
preeclampsia), which may be linked to stimulating vascularity and placental were excluded. It may be that without an
excessive GWG, then a healthy lifestyle growth.27 Furthermore, exercise has been exercise intervention and weekly
initiated preconception and in early shown to reduce excessive GWG in accountability, few pregnant women will
gestation may perhaps be the key issues to normal-weight,28,29 overweight, and continue exercising on their own. One
preventing chronic disease risk in both obese women,30 and to improve maternal limitation of our study is that we did not
mother and baby. Epidemiological studies health perception31 and mood.32,33 assess nutrition or energy intake, how-
suggest that women who are physically Women with !2 pregnancies may also ever, all women had standard care and
active are less likely to develop gestational benefit from maternal exercise because information regarding a healthy lifestyle
hypertension, based on retrospective our results would suggest that these during pregnancy, as the only difference
questionnaires, and none examined the women may be more susceptible to between the 2 groups was the initiation
interaction of exercise and prevention of excessive GWG than women with fewer of the exercise program. In addition, we
excessive GWG.12-15 We believe we are the pregnancies. In addition, exercise has did not assess occupational job stress in
first to link an early exercise intervention been linked to beneficial fetal and preg- our participants, which may also be
with high adherence and prevention of nancy outcomes.34-36 Our large RCT linked to baby size at birth42 although we
excessive weight gain to reducing the confirms that a healthy lifestyle inter- did control for occupation.
incidence of maternal chronic disease risk vention with high adherence that pre- A potential weakness may be the
(hypertension and GDM). In any RCT vents excessive GWG may indeed provide utility and applicability of our findings to
examining the effects of an exercise pro- a healthy environment to prevent future other clinical settings. However, it was
gram, high adherence and early preven- chronic disease risk in both mother and our intent to offer this exercise program
tion of excessive GWG may be the key offspring. Excessive GWG, macrosomia, within a hospital setting, with “buy-in”
issues to the efficacy of the trial. and low-birthweight babies have been from the hospitals involved. Many
Maternal exercise has many benefits linked with childhood obesity37-40 and pregnant women do not engage in
and has been associated with lowering of other offspring chronic disease risks, physical activity unless advised by their
BP25 and an increase in aerobic and car- including cardiovascular disease.41 physician/obstetrician to do so and with
diovascular conditioning.26 Engaging in an intervention placed within the hos-
exercise may be particularly important Strengths and weaknesses pital setting, our intervention women
for nulliparous women, as we found the The major strengths of our study are the were motivated to attend at least 80% of
incidence of hypertension and preterm large RCT with high adherence (!80% the offered sessions. Because of the suc-
delivery was reduced in our first-time attendance) in our exercise group and cess of our program, perhaps more

649.e6 American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MAY 2016


ajog.org OBSTETRICS Original Research

3. Cortés Pérez S, Pérez Milán F, Gobernado


TABLE 4 Tejedor JA, Mora Cepeda P. Epidemiología de
Effect of exercise on hypertension and other pregnancy outcomes los estados hipertensivos del embarazo. Clin
stratified by parity categories (none, 1, ‡2) Invest Ginecol Obstet 2009;36:132-9.
4. Task Force on the Management of Cardio-
All (n ¼ 765) vascular Diseases during Pregnancy of the Eu-
ropean Society of Cardiology (ESC). ESC
n/% Control (n ¼ 383) Exercise (n ¼ 382) P guidelines on the management of cardiovascular
Maternal hypertension diseases during pregnancy. Eur Heart J
2011;32:3147-97.
None 13/5.7 5/1.9 .03a 5. Abbas AE, Lester SJ, Connolly H. Pregnancy
1 5/3.9 2/2.0 .40 and the cardiovascular system. Int J Cardiol
2005;98:179-89.
!2 4/14.8 1/4.3 .22 6. Brown CM, Garovic VD. Mechanisms and
Excessive maternal weight gain management of hypertension in pregnant
women. Curr Hypertens Rep 2011;13:338-46.
None 72/31.4 71/27.4 .33 7. Roberts JM, Lain KY. Recent insights into the
1 46/36.2 25/25.0 .07 pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia. Placenta
2002;23:359-72.
!2 13/48.1 5/21.7 .053b 8. Chandrasekaran S, Levine L, Durnwald C,
Gestational diabetes Elovitz MA, Srinivas SK. Excessive weight gain
and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in the
None 10/4.4 5/1.9 .12 obese patient. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med
1 8/6.3 3/3.0 .25 2015;28:964-8.
9. O’Brien TE, Ray J, Chan WS. Maternal body
!2 3/11.1 1/4.3 .38 mass index and the risk of preeclampsia: a sys-
Preterm delivery, <37 wk tematic overview. Epidemiology 2003;14:368-74.
10. He Y, Wen S, Tan H, et al. Study on the in-
None 26/11.4 16/6.2 .04c fluence of pregnancy-induced hypertension on
1 6/4.7 10/10.0 .12 neonatal birth weight and its interaction with
other factors. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi
!2 5/18.5 3/13.0 .60 2014;35:397-400.
a
Odds ratio, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.12e0.93; b Odds ratio, 0.30, 95% confidence interval, 0.09e1.04; c Odds 11. Alves E, Azevedo A, Rodrigues T,
ratio, 0.51, 95% confidence interval, 0.27e0.99. Santos AC, Barros H. Impact of risk factors on
Barakat et al. Early maternal exercise prevents hypertension. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016. hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, in primip-
arae and multiparae. Ann Hum Biol 2013;40:
377-84.
clinics and hospital settings should adopt control group, examination of the pri- 12. Martin CL, Huber L. Physical activity and
hypertensive complications during pregnancy:
this type of exercise presentation to make mary outcome provides little relevant findings from 2004 to 2006 North Carolina
a difference in the health and potential information to clinical practice. Further Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring Sys-
disease risk of their pregnant patients. research is required to determine if add- tem. Birth 2010;37:202-10.
Our large RCT with high adherence ing controlled nutrition in combination 13. Sorensen TK, Williams MA, Lee IM,
for all prepregnancy BMI categories with an exercise program initiated early Dashow EE, Thompson ML, Luthy DA. Recre-
ational physical activity during pregnancy and
strongly advocates the role of maternal in pregnancy will be efficacious in risk of preeclampsia. Hypertension 2003;41:
exercise started early in pregnancy in routine clinical practice to reduce the 1273-80.
reducing the risk of pregnancy-induced incidence of hypertension, its comor- 14. Saftlas AF, Logsden-Sackett N, Wang W,
hypertension, excessive GWG, and bidities including future cardiovascular Woolson R, Bracken MB. Work, leisure-time
macrosomic infants while protecting disease, and obesity risks in pregnant physical activity, and risk of preeclampsia and
gestational hypertension. Am J Epidemiol
against having a low-birthweight baby. women and the next generation. n 2004;160:758-65.
Put another way, without exercise during 15. Rudra CB, Sorensen TK, Luthy DA,
pregnancy, women are 3 times more Acknowledgment Williams MA. A prospective analysis of recrea-
likely to develop hypertension, 1.5 times The authors would like to acknowledge the tional physical activity and preeclampsia risk.
more likely to gain excessive weight, and technical assistance of the Gynecology and Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008;40:1581-8.
Obstetrics Departments of Hospital Severo 16. Genest DS, Falcao S, Gutkowska J,
2.5 times more likely to give birth to a Lavoie JL. Impact of exercise training on pre-
Ochoa, Hospital de Fuenlabrada, and Hospital
macrosomic infant. Assessment of the Puerta de Hierro of Madrid. eclampsia: potential preventive mechanisms.
exercise activity of the control group and Hypertension 2012;60:1104-9.
evaluation of adherence (attendance) to References 17. Kasawara KT, Nascimento S, Costa ML,
a prenatal exercise program must be 1. Mustafa R, Ahmed S, Gupta A, Venuto RC. Surita F, Silva L. Exercise and physical activity in
A comprehensive review of hypertension in the prevention of pre-eclampsia: systematic re-
considered when examining the effects view. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2012;91:
pregnancy. J Pregnancy 2012;2012:105918.
of RCTs because without high adherence 2. American College Obstetricians Gynecolo- 1147-57.
to the program being assessed, and gists. Hypertension in pregnancy. Obstet 18. Meher S, Duley L. Exercise or other physical
exclusion of highly active women in the Gynecol 2013;122:1122-31. activity for preventing preeclampsia and its

MAY 2016 American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 649.e7


Original Research OBSTETRICS ajog.org

complications (review). Cochrane Database gain in normal weight pregnant women. Med Sci 38. Seiga-Riz AM, Evenson KR, Dole N. Preg-
Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19;(2):CD005942. Review. Sports Exerc 2012;44:1419-26. nancy-related weight gainea link to obesity?
PMID: 16625645. 29. Ruiz JR, Perales M, Pelaez M, Lopez C, Nutr Rev 2004;62:S105-11.
19. American College Obstetricians Gynecolo- Lucia A, Barakat R. Supervised exercise-based 39. Schack-Neilsen L, Michaelsen KF,
gists. Exercise during pregnancy and the post- intervention to prevent excessive gestational Gamborg M, Mortensen EL, Sørensen TI. Gesta-
partum period. ACOG Committee opinion no. weight gain: a randomized controlled trial. Mayo tional weight gain in relation to offspring body
267, January 2002 (reaffirmed 2009). Obstet Clin Proc 2013;88:1388-97. mass index and obesity from infancy through
Gynecol 2002;99:171-3. 30. Mottola MF, Giroux I, Gratton R, et al. adulthood. Int J Obes (Lond) 2010;34:67-74.
20. O’Neill ME, Cooper KA, Mills CM, Boyce ES, Nutrition and exercise prevents excess weight 40. Ruchat SM, Mottola MF. Preventing long-
Hunyor SN. Accuracy of Borg’s ratings of gain in pregnant overweight women. Med Sci term risk of obesity for two generations: prena-
perceived exertion in the prediction of heart rates Sports Exerc 2010;42:265-72. tal physical activity is part of the puzzle.
during pregnancy. Br J Sports Med 1992;26: 31. Barakat R, Pelaez M, Lopez C, Montejo R, J Pregnancy 2012;2012:470247.
121-4. Coteron J. Exercise during pregnancy 41. Benyshek DC. The developmental origins of
21. Institute of Medicine. Weight gain during reduces the rate of cesarean and instrumental obesity and related health disorderseprenatal and
pregnancy: reexamining the guidelines. Wash- deliveries: results of a randomized controlled perinatal factors. Coll Antropol 2007;31:11-7.
ington (DC): National Academies Press; 2009: trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25: 42. Lee BE, Ha M, Park H, et al. Psychosocial
324. 2372-6. work stress during pregnancy and birthweight.
22. Stetzer BP, Thomas A, Amini SB, 32. Polman R, Kaiseler M, Borkoles E. Effect of a Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2011;25:246-54.
Catalano PM. Neonatal anthropometric mea- single bout of exercise on the mood of pregnant
surements to predict birth weight by ultrasound. women. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2007;47:
J Perinatol 2002;22:397-402. 103-11.
Author and article information
23. Moher D, Dulberg CS, Wells GA. Statistical 33. Poudevigne MS, O’Connor PJ. Physical From the Physical Activity and Sports in Specific Pop-
power, sample size, and their reporting in ran- activity and mood during pregnancy. Med Sci ulations (AFIPE) Research Group, Faculty of Physical
domized controlled trials. JAMA 1994;272: Sports Exerc 2005;37:1374-80. Activity and Sports Sciences-Facultad de Ciencias de la
122-4. 34. Ferraro ZM, Gaudet L, Adamo KB. The po- Actividad Fı́sica y el Deporte, Technical University of
24. Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Sample size calcu- tential impact of physical activity during preg- Madrid, Madrid, Spain (Drs Barakat, Pelaez, Perales,
lations in randomized trials: mandatory and nancy on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Lopez, and Coteron); Catholic University of Murcia,
mystical. Lancet 2005;365:1348-53. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2012;67:99-110. Murcia, Spain (Dr Cordero); and R. Samuel McLaughlin
25. Yeo S. Prenatal stretching exercise and 35. Barakat R, Pelaez M, Montejo R, Luaces M, Foundation-Exercise and Pregnancy Laboratory, School
autonomic responses: preliminary data and a Zakynthinaki M. Exercise during pregnancy im- of Kinesiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of
model for reducing preeclampsia. J Nurs proves maternal health perception: a random- Anatomy and Cell Biology, Schulich School of Medicine
Scholarsh 2010;42:113-21. ized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol and Dentistry, Children’s Health Research Institute, Uni-
26. Ruchat SM, Davenport MH, Giroux I, et al. 2011;204:402.e1-7. versity of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
Walking program of low or vigorous intensity 36. May LE, Suminski RR, Langaker MD, (Dr Mottola).
during pregnancy confers an aerobic benefit. Int Yeh HW, Gustafson KM. Regular maternal ex- Received Oct. 8, 2015; revised Nov. 23, 2015;
J Sports Med 2012;33:661-6. ercise dose and fetal heart outcome. Med Sci accepted Nov. 30, 2015.
27. Falcao S, Bisotto S, Michel C, et al. Exercise Sports Exerc 2012;44:1252-8. The authors report no conflict of interest.
training can attenuate preeclampsia-like fea- 37. Oken E, Kleinman KP, Belfort MB, This work was partially supported by the program
tures in an animal model. J Hypertension Hammitt JK, Gillman MW. Associations of AL14-PID-39, AL15-PID-06, Technical University of
2010;28:2446-53. gestational weight gain with short- and longer- Madrid, Spain.
28. Ruchat SM, Davenport MH, Giroux I, et al. term maternal and child health outcomes. Am Corresponding author: Michelle F. Mottola, PhD,
Nutrition and exercise reduce excessive weight J Epidemiol 2009;170:173-80. FACSM. [email protected]

649.e8 American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MAY 2016

You might also like