Non XN
Non XN
Non XN
INTRODUCTION
2) To correct proclination
4) To intrude teeth
Wigglegram:
2) Arch expansion
3) Molar distalization
4) Derotation of posterior teeth
5) Inter-proximal reduction
3) Borderline cases
ARCH EXPANSION
TYPES OF APPLIANCE
Slow expansion
1. Jack screws
2. Coffin spring
3. Quad helix
Rapid expansion
Removable
Fixed
1. Hass type
2. hyrax type
3. Isaacson type
4. Derichsweiler type
HASS TYPE
BONDED RME
QUAD HELIX
W ARCH
PROXIMAL STRIPPING
This is usually done whenever the space required for correcting the
malalignment is minimal (3-4 mm).
Can be done in either arch
Can be done manually with abrasive strips or with an airotor
Decision to do interproximal reduction is based on the model analysis
concerning the overall size discrepancy.
It could also be added up with a Bolton analysis.
MOLAR DISTALIZATION
The upper arch is better suited for distalization than the lower; the
reason being the nature of the bone in the mandible
Effects of molar distalization:
1. Proclination of anteriors
INDICATIONS
Classification
1. Location of appliance
Extra-oral
Intra-oral
Buccal
Palatal
Bodily movement
Tipping movement
Maximum compliance
Minimum or No compliance
5. Type of appliance
Removable
Fixed
6. Arches involved
Intra-arch
Inter-arch
Very efficient
Reciprocal forces are not transmitted to other teeth
Molar movements depends on direction of force in relation to the
Centre of Res of the molar & magnitude of force
Cervical Headgear
Short face Class II maxillary protrusive cases with low MPA &
Deepbite
Extrusive & distalizing effect
Lower anterior facial height is less
Headgears
Wilson Bimetric arch design
Molar distalization with magnets
Use of Super elastic NiTi
Jones Jig
The Pendulum appliance
The K-loop appliance
The distal jet
Using Implants
DEROTATION OF POSTERIORS
The posterior teeth when rotated,occupy a larger space than when they are
normally placed.
Leeway space – 7mm in the lower and 5mm in the upper becomes
available
To capture this space – fit an lip bumper, lingual arch or an palatal
bar
Dugoni et al (AO – 1995) – has shown that stable results can be
achieved by using leeway space than by extracting premolars
Thank you