Davilla-Bond and The Latin American Sweater Market PDF

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 12

Analysis of Davilla-Bond and the

Latin American sweater market

Herma Alberta Kroon, 28071921


Nameer Rather, 27144658
Saleema Aftab, 27162826
Tutorial day and time: Wednesday, 4pm-5pm
Tutor’s name: Janie Chin Hsien Yeen
Questions in the case
Q1. Would increased sales to Mexico help alleviate some of the uncertainty that D & Bond was experiencing?

Q2. Were there underlying issues related to Ecuador’s adoption of the U.S. Dollar that might dampen the
potential in the Mexican market?

Q3. Would finding stronger distribution partners there (in Mexico) be essential?

Q4. What were the benefits and drawbacks of possibly getting involved in manufacturing in Mexico, perhaps
through one of the Mexican maquila’s?

Q5. Did it make sense to outsource some part of his production to Mexico?

Q6. And if so, could the D & Bond quality reputation be maintained?
History
1974: Fernando Davila & Rosalind Bond -> Hilacril

1980: Company began to export to Colombia

1990: Finished products under the brand name D & Bond

2003: Exporting to Colombia, Mexico, Brazil, Bolivia and Chile


Q1. Would increased sales to Mexico help alleviate some of the uncertainty that D &
Bond was experiencing?

Yes, increased sales to Mexico would alleviate some of the uncertainty as the company is relying too heavily on the
Ecuadorian market, with over half of the company’s sales coming from Ecuador.

1. Ecuador faces Chronic economic,corruption and political problems.


2. Sales in Ecuador are subject to a dynamic and unstable environment
3. Increase in labour cost had resulted in a loss of D & Bs competitive advantage of producing in Ecuador
Sales in other international markets has also deteriorated, with

1. ·The importer in Chile had lost interest in D and Bond, there were reducing sales in Chile,
2. Sales declining in Chile due to stiff competition from other international comanies, the importer had a lot of
different companies to import from other than D & bond
3. Economic crisis in Argentina had trickled down to Brazil, devaluation of Brazilian real had made
continuation of sales to Brazil unprofitable
Q2. Were there underlying issues related to Ecuador’s adoption of the U.S. Dollar that might dampen the
potential in the Mexican market?

A weak domestic currency stimulates exports, and a strong domestic currency makes the country’s exports less
competitive in the international market compared to goods from other countries. (Wang, 2016)

Firstly, the Dollarization will affect the tax structure in Ecuador. Taxes are frequent to change and the min taxes in
Ecuador are progressive income tax (up to 25%) and Value-added tax (12%)

Progressive income tax would affect the profit D & B earns as the tax is now paid in dollars as compared to the Sucre
(old currency) which had a lot less value compared to the dollar (25000 to 1$ in 1999). This could hinder the potential
of expanding in Mexico as D & B has less profit compared to before Dollarization.

Value-added tax also effects D & B in terms of manufacturing. D & Bs factory of acrylic yarn produces the raw
materials for its weaving department to make finished products for its consumers.
Q3. Would finding stronger distribution partners there (in Mexico) be essential?

2004: D & Bond was developing its distributors


1. Sell under the original name D & Bond + private label like Liverpool, Wal-Mart
2. Tackle the lower markets all over Mexico -> great boost on sales
Q4. What were the benefits and drawbacks of possibly getting involved in
manufacturing in Mexico, perhaps through one of the Mexican maquila’s?

Benefits:

1. Mexico: largest trading nation in Latin America and the eighth largest of the world.
2. GDP growth had been strong since 1996. More growth in the future was almost a certainty.
3. With a market of 101 million people and a GDP of $9,100 per capita, an increase in sales in Mexico was
promising
4. Ecuadorian’s labour costs are rising, Mexico will become a cheaper option in the future.

Drawbacks:

1. Mexico’s labor laws are difficult to handle


2. Mexico had a significant problem with clothing industries and counterfeit/contraband difficulties with other
consumer goods
3. D & Bond has not enough money to start a factory
Q5. Did it make sense to outsource some part of his production to Mexico?

- Outsourcing - making a contract with an outside supplier to produce for you


- D & Bond is dependent on Ecuadorian
- Machines are working on their optimum level
- Outsourcing to Mexico seems promising
- Six fold increase in sales in Mexico makes it a vital market
- Expand D & Bond's market and reduce the cost of exporting and transportation to Mexico
- Labor cost would shift from Ecuador to Mexico making it a competitive advantage.
- Labor laws in Mexico being difficult makes outsourcing ideal.
Q6. And if so, could the D & Bond quality reputation be
maintained?
- D & Bond’s products were made from advanced technology
- Expensive machinery imported from Germany and its raw synthetic imported from Germany and Peru made
the brand image creating high quality products.
- D & Bond’s each final product goes through 7 point quality check before sold
- Establishing D & Bond's quality expectations upfront would reduce any chance of errors
- Few investment and capital restrictions in Mexico would mean easy access to the German machinery being
imported.
- Improved working conditions with high payments, being paid $250 while minimum wage $150, would mean
less or non existent labour turnover.

You might also like